Skip to main content
AAPS PharmSci logoLink to AAPS PharmSci
. 2000 Apr 24;2(2):16–26. doi: 10.1208/ps020212

Light-scattering investigations on dilute nonionic oil-in-water microemulsions

Warangkana Warisnoicharoen 1,, Alison B Lansley 1, M Jayne Lawrence 1,
PMCID: PMC2751026  PMID: 11741228

Abstract

Dilute 3-component nonionic oil-in-water microemulsions formulated with either a polyoxyethylene surfactant (C18∶1E10 or C12E10) or the alkylamine-N-oxide surfactant, DDAO (C12AO), and containing either a triglyceride or an ethyl ester oil have been examined using dynamic and static light-scattering techniques. Analysis of the results showed distinct differences in the tested oils mode of incorporation into the microemulsion droplets, with both the molecular volume of the oil and the hydrophobic chain length of the surfactant being important. For example, microemulsions formulated by C18∶1E10 and containing one of the larger molecular volume oils (that is, either a triglyceride, Miglyol 812, or soybean oil) or the ethyl ester of fatty acid oil, ethyl oleate, exhibited first a decrease and then an increase in hydrodynamic size and surfactant aggregation number, suggesting that the asymmetric C18∶1E10 micelles became spherical upon the addition of a small amount of oil and grew thereafter because of further oil being incorporated into the core of the spherical microemulsion droplet. A similar conclusion of sphericity could not be drawn for microemulsions stabilized by C18∶1E10 and containing one of the oils smaller in molecular volume (namely tributyrin, ethyl butyrate, or ethyl caprylate) where neither the aggregation number nor the hydrodynamic radius changed much upon the addition of oil. This result suggested that these oils were preferentially located in the interfacial surfactant monolayer, behaving in much the same way as a cosurfactant. A different trend of results, however, was seen for microemulsions prepared using C12E10 and C12AO, most likely because these surfactants produced approximately spherical micelles. In this case, the microemulsions containing the oils larger in molecular volume tended to exhibit an increase in surfactant aggregation number and hydrodynamic size, suggesting the growth of spherical micelles, while the smaller oils (in particular ethyl butyrate) caused a significant decrease in surfactant aggregation number incompatible with their being incorporated into the centre of the droplet, suggesting that the oils were being located in the interfacial surfactant monolayer. These results suggest that the various oils are incorporated into the microemulsions in very different ways.

Footnotes

published April 24, 2000

References

  • 1.Malcolmson C, Satra C, Kantaria S, Sidhu A, Lawrence MJ. Effect of the nature of the oil on the incorporation of testosterone propionate into nonionic oil-in-water microemulsions. J Pharm Sci. 1998;87:109–116. doi: 10.1021/js9700863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Warisnoicharoen W, Lansely AB, Lawrence MJ. Nonionic oil-in-water microemulsions: The effect of oil type on phase behaviour. Int J Pharm. 2000;198:7–27. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00406-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Malcolmson C, Lawrence MJ. A comparison of the incorporation of model steroids into non-ionic micellar and microemulsion systems. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1993;45:141–143. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1993.tb03700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hoffmann H, Oetter G, Schwandner B. The aggregation behavior of tetradecyldimethylaminoxide. Progr Colloid Polym Sci. 1987;73:95–106. doi: 10.1007/3-798-50724-4_68. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schatzel K. Light scattering-; diagnostic methods for colloidal dispersions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 1993;46:309–332. doi: 10.1016/0001-8686(93)80046-E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lawrence MJ, Lawrence SM, Barlow DJ. Aggregation and surface properties of synthetic double chain nonionic surfactants in aqueous solution. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1997;49:594–600. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1997.tb06851.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abe M, Uchiyama H, Yamaguchi T, Suzuki T, Ogino K, Scamehorn JF, Christian SD. Micelle formation by pure nonionic surfactants and their mixtures. Langmuir. 1992;8:2147–2151. doi: 10.1021/la00045a014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koppel DE. Analysis of macromolecular polydispersity in intensity correlation spectroscopy. The methods of cumulants. J Phys Chem. 1972;57:4814–4820. doi: 10.1063/1.1678153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malcolmson C, Lawrence MJ. Three-component nomonie oil-in-water microemulsions using polyoxyethylene ether surfactants. Colloids & Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 1995;4:97–109. doi: 10.1016/0927-7765(94)01160-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Conroy JP, Hall C, Leng CA, Rendall K, Tiddy GJT, Walsh J, Londblom G. Nonionic surfactant phase behavior. The effect of CH3 capping of the terminal OH. Accurate measurements of cloud curves. Progr Colloid Polym Sci. 1990;82:253–262. doi: 10.1007/BFb0118266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oetter G, Hoffmann H. Ringing gels and their fascinating properties. Colloids Surf. 1989;38:225–250. doi: 10.1016/0166-6622(89)80155-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Timmins PA, Hauk J, Wacker T, Welte W. The influence of heptane-1,2,3-triol on the size and shape of LDAO micelles. FEBS Lett. 1991;280:115–120. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80217-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AAPS PharmSci are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

RESOURCES