Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1978 Jul;8(1):28–35. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.1.28-35.1978

Evaluation of Port-A-Cul transport system for protection of anaerobic bacteria.

E Mena, F S Thompson, A Y Armfield, V R Dowell Jr, D J Reinhardt
PMCID: PMC275109  PMID: 353071

Abstract

The protection of anaerobes in Port-A-Cul (PAC) transport system (Bioquest, Div. of Becton, Dickinson &Co., Cockeysville, Md.) tubes and vials was studied. Ten species of obligately anaerobic bacteria commonly isolated from clinical specimens were used to prepare simulated swab and fluid specimens in high and low concentrations. Samples in PAC tubes and vials were held for 2, 24, and 48 h at ambient temperature and in a refrigerator. In addition, samples of the simulated specimens were exposed to controlled anaerobic and aerobic conditions in vented tubes and vials, with and without PAC medium, at ambient and refrigerator temperatures. Viable bacterial colony counts from specimens in PAC tubes and vials used as recommended by the manufacturer were consistently greater than those from specimens exposed to the different controlled conditions. The protection in PAC was about equal for specimens with either high or low concentrations of bacteria. Protection of the anaerobes in PAC was more obvious with swab than with fluid specimens. Quantitative recovery of anaerobes from refrigerated PAC samples, with few exceptions, was comparable to that from PAC samples held at ambient temperature.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Attebery H. R., Finegold S. M. A miniature anaerobic jar for tissue transport or for cultivation of anaerobes. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970 Mar;53(3):383–388. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/53.3.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry A. L., Fay G. D., Sauer R. L. Efficiency of a transport medium for the recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from applicator swabs. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Jul;24(1):31–33. doi: 10.1128/am.24.1.31-33.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartlett J. G., Sullivan-Sigler N., Louie T. J., Gorbach S. L. Anaerobes survive in clinical specimens despite delayed processing. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Feb;3(2):133–136. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.2.133-136.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chow A. W., Cunningham P. J., Guze L. B. Survival of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria in a nonsupportive gassed transport system. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Feb;3(2):128–132. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.2.128-132.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Christian D. L., Ederer G. M. Evaluation of bacteriological transport media. Am J Med Technol. 1973 Jan;39(1):12–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Felner J. M., Dowell V. R., Jr "Bacteroides" bacteremia. Am J Med. 1971 Jun;50(6):787–796. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(71)90187-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gästrin B., Kallings L. O., Marcetic A. The survival time for different bacteria in various transport media. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1968;74(3):371–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1968.tb03490.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hallander H. O., Flodström A., Holmberg K. Influence of the collection and transport of specimens on the recovery of bacteria from peritonsillar abscesses. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Dec;2(6):504–509. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.6.504-509.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Helstad A. G., Kimball J. L., Maki D. G. Recovery of anaerobic, facultative, and aerobic bacteria from clinical specimens in three anaerobic transport systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Jun;5(6):564–569. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.6.564-569.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hentges D. J., Maier B. R. Theoretical basis for anaerobic methodology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972 Dec;25(12):1299–1305. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Loesche W. J. Oxygen sensitivity of various anaerobic bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Nov;18(5):723–727. doi: 10.1128/am.18.5.723-727.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rein M. F., Mandell G. L. Bacterial killing by bacteriostatic saline solutions--potential for diagnostic error. N Engl J Med. 1973 Oct 11;289(15):794–795. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197310112891508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stargel D., Thompson F. S., Phillips S. E., Lombard G. L., Dowell V. R., Jr Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Mar;3(3):291–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.3.291-301.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Syed S. A., Loesche W. J. Survival of human dental plaque flora in various transport media. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Oct;24(4):638–644. doi: 10.1128/am.24.4.638-644.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tally F. P., Stewart P. R., Sutter V. L., Rosenblatt J. E. Oxygen tolerance of fresh clinical anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Feb;1(2):161–164. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.2.161-164.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilkins T. D., Jimenez-Ulate F. Anaerobic specimen transport device. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Nov;2(5):441–447. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.5.441-447.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yrios J. W., Balish E., Helstad A., Field C., Inhorn S. Survival of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria on cotton swabs in three transport systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Feb;1(2):196–200. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.2.196-200.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES