Skip to main content
The Milbank Quarterly logoLink to The Milbank Quarterly
. 1999 Mar;77(1):111–172. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00126

Innovation and Public Accountability in Clinical Research

Evan M Melhado 1
PMCID: PMC2751113  PMID: 10197029

Abstract

For more than 20 years, clinical researchers have expressed alarm about the decline of their field, but they have failed to achieve a consensus on policies to revitalize and sustain it. Although they have traced the plight of clinical research to profound changes in science, medicine, and public expectations, their conservative vision and preference for short-term measures inhibit effective policy formulation. These trends are the outcome of historical developments, and they seem to mandate a new approach to public policy. A potential source for more viable and socially accountable policies lies in practitioners' notion that clinical research bridges basic and applied science (by translating scientific innovations into practical measures). Exploiting that idea, however, would require a major reorientation of the field toward health services research and the institutions that are struggling to support it.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (298.5 KB).


Articles from The Milbank Quarterly are provided here courtesy of Milbank Memorial Fund

RESOURCES