Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1975 May;1(5):465–468. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.5.465-468.1975

Use of urease test disks in the identification of mycobacteria.

D B Murphy, J E Hawkins
PMCID: PMC275145  PMID: 1176615

Abstract

Use of commercially available urea differentiation disks is a rapid and convenient means of determining the urease activity of mycobacteria. In the study performed, paper disks containing Ewing's Urea R Broth were compared with two other methods of testing for urease production. Over 1,500 tests were performed with recent patient isolates from which at least 15 different species of mycobacteria were identified. The tests were read at intervals for 72 h, and a comparison of test results as to rapidity and accuracy for each species was tabulated. The urea disks showed a faster reaction time when compared with the other two methods. They also showed a high percentage (79 to 100%) of reliability for each species on the first run, based on the expected response.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Christensen W. B. Urea Decomposition as a Means of Differentiating Proteus and Paracolon Cultures from Each Other and from Salmonella and Shigella Types. J Bacteriol. 1946 Oct;52(4):461–466. doi: 10.1128/jb.52.4.461-466.1946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kilburn J. O., Silcox V. A., Kubica G. P. Differential identification of Mycobacteria. V. The tellurite reduction test. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969 Jan;99(1):94–100. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1969.99.1.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kubica G. P. Differential identification of mycobacteria. VII. Key features for identification of clinically significant mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1973 Jan;107(1):9–21. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1973.107.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. OIZUMI K., KUDO S. Urease test for isoniazid-resistant human tubercle bacilli. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1963 Feb;87:286–288. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1963.87.2.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. TODA T., HAGIHARA Y., TAKEYA K. A simple urease test for the classification of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1961 May;83:757–761. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1961.83.5.757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. URABE K., SAITO H. THE UREASE ACTIVITY OF MYCOBACTERIA. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1964 Aug;90:266–267. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1964.90.2.266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wayne L. G., Dietz T. M., Gernez-Rieux C., Jenkins P. A., Käppler W., Kubica G. P., Kwapinski J. B., Meissner G., Pattyn S. R., Runyon E. H. A co-operative numerical anaysis of scotochromogenic slowly growing mycobacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1971 Jun;66(3):255–271. doi: 10.1099/00221287-66-3-255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wayne L. G., Doubek J. R. Diagnostic key to mycobacteria encountered in clinical laboratories. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Jun;16(6):925–931. doi: 10.1128/am.16.6.925-931.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wayne L. G. Simple pyrazinamidase and urease tests for routine identification of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974 Jan;109(1):147–151. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1974.109.1.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES