Skip to main content
NCBI home page
AAPS PharmSci logoLink to AAPS PharmSci
. 2003 Apr 16;5(2):48–60. doi: 10.1208/ps050213

Wet granulation fine particle ethylcellulose tablets: Effect of production variables and mathematical modeling of drug release

Anjali M Agrawal 1, Steven H Neau 1,✉, Peter L Bonate 2
PMCID: PMC2751521  PMID: 12866940

Abstract

In the present study, the applicability of fine particle ethylcellulose (FPEC) to produce matrix tablets by a wet granulation technique was evaluated. The effect of various formulation and process variables, such as FPEC content, hardness of the tablet, and solubility of the drug, on the release of drug from these tablets was examined. Tablets were prepared by wet granulation of drug and FPEC in an appropriate mass ratio. Theophylline, caffeine, and dyphylline were selected as nonionizable model drugs with solubilities from 8.3 to 330 mg/mL at 25°C. Ibuprofen, phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride, and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride were selected as ionizable drugs with solubilities from 0.1 to 2000 mg/mL at 25°C. Drug release studies were conducted in 37°C water with UV detection. As the FPEC content and the hardness of the tablets increased, the release rate of the drug decreased. The drug release rate increased with an increase in the solubility of the drug. Model equations, intended to elucidate the drug release mechanism, were fitted to the release data. Parameters were generated and data presented by SAS software. The Akaike Information Criterion was also considered to ascertain the best-fit equation. Fickian diffusion and polymer relaxation were the release mechanisms for nonionizable and ionizable drugs.

Key words: fine particle ethylcellulose, wet granulation, ionizable drugs, nonionizable drugs, Fickian diffusion, polymer relaxation

References

  • 1.Donbrow M, Friedman M. Permeability of films of ethylcellulose and PEG to caffeine. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1974;26:148–150. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1974.tb09246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chowhan ZT. Role of binders in moisture-induced hardness increase in compressed tablets and its effect on in vitro disintegration and dissolution. J Pharm Sci. 1980;69:1–4. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600690102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jalsenjak I, Nicolaidon CF, Nixon JR. In vitro dissolution of phenobarbitone sodium from ethylcellulose microcapsules. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976;28:912–914. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1976.tb04090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bodmeier R, Chen H. Preparation and characterization of microspheres containing the anti-inflammatory agents, indomethacin, ihuprofen, and ketoprofen. J Control Release. 1989;10:167–175. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(89)90059-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shaikh NA, Abidi SE, Block LH. Evaluation of ethylcellulose matrix for prolonged release formulations. I. Water soluble drugs: acetaminophen and theophylline. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1987;13:1345–1369. doi: 10.3109/03639048709068380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shaikh NA, Abidi SE, Block LH. Evaluation of ethylcellulose as a matrix for prolonged release formulations II. Sparingly water-soluble drugs: ibuprofen and indomethacin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1987;13:2495–2518. doi: 10.3109/03639048709020600. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Porter SC. Controlled-release film coatings based on ethylcellulose. Drug Dev Ind. Pharm. 1989;15:1495–1521. doi: 10.3109/03639048909052501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Upadrashta SM, Katikaneni PR, Hileman GA, Keshary PR. Direct compression controlled release tablets using ethylcellulose matrices. Drug Dev Int Pharm. 1993;19:449–460. doi: 10.3109/03639049309063202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Katikaneni PR, Upadrashta SM, Neau SH, Mitra AK. Ethylcellulose matrix controlled release tablets of a water-soluble drug. Int J Pharm. 1995;123:119–125. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)00060-V. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Katikaneni PR, Upadrashta SM, Rowlings CE, Neau SH, Hileman GA. Consolidation of ethylcellulose: effect of particle size, press speed and lubricants. Int J Pharm. 1995;117:13–21. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(94)00288-G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pather SI, Russell I, Syce JA, Neau SH. Sustained release theophylline tablets by direct compression. Part I: formulation and in vitro testing. Int J Pharm. 1998;164:1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(97)00348-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pollock DK, Sheskey PJ. Micronized ethylcellulose: opportunities in direct-compression controlled-release tablets. Pharm Technol. 1996;20:120–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Neau SH, Howard MA, Claudius JS, Howard DR. The effect of the aqueous solubility of xanthine derivatives on the release mechanism from ethylcellulose matrix tablets. Int J Pharm. 1999;179:97–105. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00391-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Banker GS, Anderson NR. Tablets. In: Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL, editors. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1987. pp. 293–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bolhuis GK, Chowhan ZT. Material properties of importance for powder volume reduction and compact strength. In: Alderborn G, Nystrom C, editors. Pharmacentical Powder Compaction Technology. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1996. pp. 580–591. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gennaro AR, editor. Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy. 20th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang LL, Schwartz JB. Studies on drug release from a carbomer tablet matrix. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1995;21:1487–1501. doi: 10.3109/03639049509069240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ritger PL, Peppas NA. A sumple equation for description of solute release. I. Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J Control Rel. 1987;5:23–36. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yamoaka K, Nakagawa T, Uno T. Application of Akaike s Information Criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetics equations. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1978;6:165–175. doi: 10.1007/BF01117450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained-action medication: theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci. 1963;52:1145–1148. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600521210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;48:139–157. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Peppas NA, Sahlin JJ. A simple equation for the description of solute release. III. Coupling of diffusion and relaxation. Int J Pharm. 1989;57:169–172. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(89)90306-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harland RS, Gazzaniga A, Sangalli ME, Colombo P, Peppas NA. Drug/polymer matrix swelling and dissolution. Pharm Res. 1988;5:488–494. doi: 10.1023/A:1015913207052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AAPS PharmSci are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

RESOURCES