Abstract
A 71-year-old Japanese man with acute cholecystitis and an incarcerated gallbladder (GB) stone was admitted. Plain ultrasonography (US) incidentally detected a mass-like lesion in the fundus. Doppler US revealed that this elevated lesion had no blood flow. Computed tomography showed a relatively low-density mass, measuring 5 cm x 4 cm in diameter, with no positive enhancement. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a mass in the fundus with a slightly low intensity on T1-weighted images and a slightly high intensity on T2-weighted images. We were agonized in making the qualitative diagnosis of mass-like lesions of the fundus, such as a benign tumor, cancer, or debris. We performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, because the incarcerated GB stone clearly caused acute cholecystitis. Intra-operative cholangiography clearly revealed pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Amylase levels in the common bile duct and gallbladder were quite high. The elevated lesion in the fundus clearly showed severe necrosis. Although this necrotic nodule included non-viable adenocarcinoma cells, viable cancer cell nests were located in the muscularis propria and subcutaneous layer. Histopathological examination confirmed a solid adenocarcinoma. Thus, we diagnosed it as a gallbladder cancer, based on histopathological analysis of the resected specimen. We therefore undertook radical surgery, including wedge resection of the liver, radical dissection of regional lymph nodes, and resection of the extrahepatic bile duct. Histopathological findings revealed no cancer, hyperplasia or dysplasia in the additionally resected specimens. The patient was finally staged as T2, N0, H0, P0, M(-), stage II. We present the first case of spontaneous necrosis of solid gallbladder adenocarcinoma, with a review of previous studies.
Keywords: Gallbladder carcinoma, Pancreaticobiliary maljunction, Spontaneous necrosis
INTRODUCTION
Traditionally, gallbladder (GB) cancer had a poor prognosis because of the lack of recognized symptoms at early stages. Early-stage GB cancer is often detected in resected specimens after cholecystectomy for benign diseases[1,2]. Moreover, GB cancer is sometimes detected in association with pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM), which is the union of the pancreatic and biliary ducts at a site outside the duodenal wall[3].
Some previous studies have described spontaneous necrosis of parathyroid and adrenal gland tumors[4-7]. However, spontaneous necrosis of GB tumors is quite rare. Only one case of spontaneous necrosis of papillary GB adenocarcinoma has been reported[8]. We present here the first case of spontaneous necrosis of solid GB carcinoma accompanied with PBM, and the etiology of spontaneous necrosis was discussed with a review of previous studies. In the present case, histopathological findings were described, based on the general rules for surgical and pathological studies of cancer of the biliary tract of the Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery[9], according to the TNM classification[10].
CASE REPORT
Clinical course after admission
A 71-year-old Japanese man was referred to Takayama Red Cross Hospital (Gifu, Japan) due to severe right upper quadrant pain and frequent episodes of spiking fever and shivering chills. He had a history of hypertension and atherosclerosis. Ultrasonography (US) showed acute cholecystitis due to an incarcerated GB stone. He underwent drug treatment including sulbactam/cefoperazone (SBT/CPZ) in the first instance, and his symptoms were well controlled, without percutaneous transhepatic bile drainage. Although serum biochemistry showed elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase and C-reactive protein at admission, peripheral blood examination was normal after administration of SBT/CPZ. Thereafter, we performed detailed investigations.
Image studies and tumor markers
Plain US of the GB showed wall thickening of the neck and body (consistent with cholecystitis), a strong echo with acoustic shadow at the neck (consistent with GB stones), and a mass-like lesion of the fundus (Figure 1A). In addition, this mass-like lesion moved according to the patient’s position. Doppler US revealed that the elevated lesion of the fundus had no feeding arteries and drainage veins (Figure 1B). Plain computed tomography (CT) showed a relatively low-density mass in the fundus, measuring 5 cm × 4 cm in diameter (Figure 2A). Contrast-enhanced CT revealed that this mass-like lesion had no positive enhancement in the early (Figure 2B) or late (Figure 2C) phase. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a mass in the fundus with a slightly low intensity on T1-weighted images (Figure 2D) and a slightly high intensity on T2-weighted images (Figure 2E). Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) showed a round defect due to an incarcerated stone in the neck and irregular defects due to the elevated lesion in the fundus (Figure 3A). Serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level was elevated, although other tumor markers including carcinoembryonic antigen, alpha-fetoprotein, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, CA125 and CA15-3 were all normal. Upper gastrointestinal and colorectal endoscopy did not reveal any abnormal findings. Positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-labeled fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) showed no FDG uptake in the GB.
Preoperative diagnosis and surgical treatment
We were agonized in making the qualitative diagnosis of mass-like lesions of the fundus, such as benign tumor, cancer, debris or bile sludge. However, the incarcerated GB stone clearly caused acute cholecystitis. We performed elective surgery (three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy), with informed consent required for an additional surgery based on histopathological diagnosis. Intraoperative cholangiography clearly revealed PBM (Figure 3B). In addition, amylase levels in the common bile duct (CBD) (bile obtained during cannulation of the CBD) and GB (bile obtained from the resected specimen) were quite high (82 752 IU/L and 69 442 IU/L, respectively). Postoperative course was uneventful, and CA19-9 levels normalized immediately after surgery.
Histopathological diagnosis
Microscopic examination revealed chronic cholecystitis with infiltration of inflammatory cells. In addition, histopathological examinations showed no necrotic changes in walls of the GB neck and body and gangrenous cholecystitis. Moreover, the elevated lesion of the fundus obviously developed necrosis (Figure 4A). This necrotic nodule included non-viable adenocarcinoma cells and remnants of glandular structures and vessel fragments (Figure 4B). Viable cancer cell nests were located in the muscularis propria and the subcutaneous layer beneath the necrotic nodule (Figure 4C). Histopathological examination confirmed a T2 solid adenocarcinoma [solid adenocarcinoma, ss, INFα, ly0, v0, pn0, hinf0, binf0, pvx, ax, St (+)] (Figure 4D). Regional lymph nodes (LNs) of the cystic duct (LN #12c) were noted without macroscopic metastasis. Thus, we diagnosed it as a GB cancer, based on histopathological analysis of the resected specimen.
Additional radical operation with radical dissection of regional LNs
The viable cells invaded perimuscular connective tissue, but did not penetrate the serosa. We were concerned about the safety margin, regional LN metastasis, and malignant potential of the CBD due to PBM. We therefore performed radical surgery, including wedge resection of the liver, including the GB bed to achieve negative margins, and radical dissection of regional LNs, including para-aortic LNs. Intraoperative histopathological examination of the induration of the mesocolon and peritoneum revealed no cancer dissemination. Furthermore, resection of the bile duct, including intrapancreatic and hilar bile ducts, was carried out. The intrahepatic bile ducts were reconstructed using hepaticojejunostomy in an end-to-side fashion. In addition, we resected the right hepatic artery by en-bloc resection with a safety margin, because an elastic, hard induration of the Calot’s triangle involved the right hepatic artery showing back flow from the remnant liver, and we did not reconstruct the hepatic artery. Histopathological findings and imaging studies finally staged the patient as T2, N0, H0, P0, M(-), stage II. No cancer, hyperplasia or dysplasia was found in the additionally resected specimens, and no regional LNs revealed metastasis (LNs #8a, 8p, 12a, 12b, 12p, 13a, 16a2, 16b1). In addition, no cancer or any precancerous lesions were seen in the extrahepatic bile duct microscopically. Until postoperative day 18, he had a good postoperative course except for gastric ulcer and pneumonitis. However, celiac artery rupture occurred suddenly on postoperative day 19, and he finally died of disseminated intravascular coagulation on postoperative day 20, despite intensive treatments.
DISCUSSION
Occult GB cancer has been incidentally found after cholecystectomy (approximate 1%)[1,2]. However, we sometimes have difficulty in making a precise diagnosis of necrotic tumor based on imaging studies[11,12]. In this case, we did not make the qualitative diagnosis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although we did not deny the possibility of the existence of cancer. Since cholecystectomy for occult GB cancer may increase the risk of intraperitoneal dissemination and port recurrence[13,14], further precise diagnosis is required before surgery. In this case, we were in a dilemma as to whether we should perform radical surgery in a suspicious case with a risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity. Regional LNs of the cystic duct (LN #12c) are sometimes obtained from resected specimens after cholecystectomy. It was reported that LN #12c may be predictive of metastasis from occult GB cancer after cholecystectomy[15]. In the present case, LNs had no metastasis and the additional resected specimens showed no metastasis microscopically, indicating that this case supports the importance of LN #12c as an indication for additional surgery in cases of occult GB cancer after cholecystectomy. Even if radical resection for inapparent carcinoma after cholecystectomy is warranted, based on the excellent prognosis after additional radical surgery[1,2,13,15,16], it is still controversial about the optimal radical surgery for T2 GB cancer of the fundus[1,2,13-17]. Some investigators have recommended several surgical methods for T2 GB cancer, such as extended right hepatectomy, segmental resection of 4a/5 or 4b/5, and radical cholecystectomy with a 2-cm margin of liver around the GB bed[17-21]. Especially in cases of T2 carcinoma of the fundus after cholecystectomy, we still have some concerns about the determination of optimal surgical treatment. The establishment of optimal surgical treatment for occult T2 cancer after cholecystectomy is necessary.
Sakurai et al[8] reported a rare case of spontaneous necrosis of GB papillary adenocarcinoma of the fundus with PBM and suggested that the causes of spontaneous necrosis are disturbance of blood flow, gangrenous cholecystitis, necrotic debris, initial wall thickening due to cancer itself, PBM and increased intraluminal pressure in the GB. We could not clearly explain the cause of spontaneous necrosis, even after reviewing the literature. Although some of our findings are consistent with previously reported findings, such as cancer in the fundus with cholecystitis and PBM[8], some factors such as initial wall thickening due to cancer itself, intravascular thrombosis, gangrenous cholecystitis and necrotic debris were not seen in our case. We speculate that the cause of spontaneous necrosis of GB cancer is the increased intraluminal pressure in GB due to stone incarceration or the activated pancreatic enzymes consequently stimulating mutagenicity due to PBM[22,23]. In particular, our case clearly demonstrated a significantly elevated level of amylase in GB, suggesting that PBM participates in the process of necrosis. The case presented may show that overlapping of increased intraluminal pressure and activated pancreatic enzyme causes spontaneous necrosis.
Bile duct carcinoma including GB cancer is one of the malignant gastroenterological tumors which are most difficult to be cured and curative resection is essential for the long-term survival of such patients. In the surgical treatment for these cancers, systematic extended lymph node dissection is frequently required for curative resection. However, even with margin-negative resection, its prognosis after curative resection remains poor. The possible reason for the poor outcome is existence of occult lymph node metastasis that cannot be detected by conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining at surgical resection[24,25]. Recently, immunohistochemical and molecular techniques have made it possible to identify lymph node micrometastasis missed by traditional methods, and Taniguchi et al[24,25] clearly demonstrated that occult lymph node metastasis is crucial for the prognosis of bile duct carcinomas including GB cancer. At present, we are still troubled about the additional treatment for occult T2 GB carcinoma after cholecystectomy. For the time being, we will recommend the radical surgery including systematic lymph node dissection for this cancer, because of the excellent prognosis after additional radical surgery[1,2,13,15,16] and the possibility of lymph node micrometastasis[24,25].
This is the first case of spontaneous necrosis of solid GB adenocarcinoma. As GB carcinoma is rarely accompanied with spontaneous necrosis, more cases should be studied in order to analyze the mechanism of spontaneous necrosis, to make a precise preoperative diagnosis, and to perform optimal radical surgery based on the adequate indication.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Kenichi Nonaka (Department of Oncologic Surgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu Prefecture, 501-1194, Japan) for his expert assistance.
Footnotes
Peer reviewer: Fanyin Meng, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University, Room 514A Medical Research Facility, 420 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
S- Editor Xiao LL L- Editor Wang XL E- Editor Zhang WB
References
- 1.Fong Y. Aggressive therapy is warranted for gallbladder cancer. Cancer Invest. 1998;16:64–65. doi: 10.3109/07357909809039757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fong Y, Heffernan N, Blumgart LH. Gallbladder carcinoma discovered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: aggressive reresection is beneficial. Cancer. 1998;83:423–427. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980801)83:3<423::aid-cncr9>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Suda K, Miyano T, Konuma I, Matsumoto M. An abnormal pancreatico-choledocho-ductal junction in cases of biliary tract carcinoma. Cancer. 1983;52:2086–2088. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831201)52:11<2086::aid-cncr2820521120>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chan WB, Chow CC, King AD, Yeung VT, Li JK, So WY, Cockram CS. Spontaneous necrosis of parathyroid adenoma: biochemical and imaging follow-up for two years. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76:96–98. doi: 10.1136/pmj.76.892.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Le Nestour E, Abecassis JP, Bertagna X, Bonnin A, Luton JP. Silent necrosis of a pituitary corticotroph adenoma revealed by timely magnetic resonance imaging: a cause of spontaneous remission of Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 1994;130:469–471. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1300469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vasatko T, Cap J, Ryska A, Kohout A. [Spontaneous necrosis of parathyroid adenoma] Vnitr Lek. 2004;50:781–785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Howard JE, Follis RH Jr, Yendt ER, Connor TB. Hyperparathyroidism; case report illustrating spontaneous remission due to necrosis of adenoma, and a study of the incidence of necroses in parathyroid adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1953;13:997–1008. doi: 10.1210/jcem-13-8-997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sakurai Y, Shoji M, Matsubara T, Suganuma M, Hasegawa S, Imazu H, Ochiai M, Funabiki T, Urano M, Mizoguchi Y, et al. Spontaneous necrosis of gallbladder carcinoma in patient with pancreaticobiliary maljunction. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8:95–100. doi: 10.1007/s005340170057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery. General rules for surgical and pathological studies on cancer of biliary tract. 5th ed. Vol. 8. Tokyo: Kanehara Pub; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch. TNM classification of marlignant tumours. 5th ed. Vol. 8. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grazi GL, Mazziotti A, Gruttadauria S, Jovine E, Principe A, Cavallari A. Solitary necrotic nodules of the liver. Am Surg. 1998;64:764–767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zoeller G, Pekrun A, Lakomek M, Ringert RH. Staging problems in the pre-operative chemotherapy of Wilms' tumour. Br J Urol. 1995;76:501–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07757.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wakai T, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K. Radical second resection provides survival benefit for patients with T2 gallbladder carcinoma first discovered after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2002;26:867–871. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6274-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shirai Y, Ohtani T, Hatakeyama K. Tumor dissemination during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1224–1225. doi: 10.1007/s004649900576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shirai Y, Yoshida K, Tsukada K, Muto T. Inapparent carcinoma of the gallbladder. An appraisal of a radical second operation after simple cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1992;215:326–331. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199204000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wakai T, Shirai Y, Yokoyama N, Ajioka Y, Watanabe H, Hatakeyama K. Depth of subserosal invasion predicts long-term survival after resection in patients with T2 gallbladder carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:447–454. doi: 10.1245/aso.2003.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reddy SK, Marroquin CE, Kuo PC, Pappas TN, Clary BM. Extended hepatic resection for gallbladder cancer. Am J Surg. 2007;194:355–361. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ohtsuka M, Miyazaki M, Itoh H, Nakagawa K, Ambiru S, Shimizu H, Nakajima N, Akikusa B, Kondo Y. Routes of hepatic metastasis of gallbladder carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;109:62–68. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/109.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Suzuki M, Yamamoto K, Unno M, Katayose Y, Endo K, Oikawa M, Matsuno S. Detection of perfusion areas of the gallbladder vein on computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP)--the background for dual S4a.S5 hepatic subsegmentectomy in advanced gallbladder carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:631–635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, Irie H, Aibe H, Tajima T, Chijiiwa K, Shimada M, Masuda K. Liver metastasis from gallbladder carcinoma: anatomic correlation with cholecystic venous drainage demonstrated by helical computed tomography during injection of contrast medium in the cholecystic artery. Cancer. 2001;92:340–348. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010715)92:2<340::aid-cncr1328>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mekeel KL, Hemming AW. Surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma: a review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1188–1193. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0115-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Komi N, Tamura T, Miyoshi Y, Kunitomo K, Udaka H, Takehara H. Nationwide survey of cases of choledochal cyst. Analysis of coexistent anomalies, complications and surgical treatment in 645 cases. Surg Gastroenterol. 1984;3:69–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Matsubara T, Tsuji T, Miyama A, Yamaguchi H, Funabiki T. Mutagenicity of bile and pancreatic juice from patients with pancreatico-biliary maljunction. Hepatogastroenterology. 1995;42:113–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Taniguchi K, Iida T, Hori T, Yagi S, Imai H, Shiraishi T, Uemoto S. Impact of lymph node micrometastasis in hilar bile duct carcinoma patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:2549–2555. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i16.2549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Taniguchi K, Tabata M, Iida T, Hori T, Yagi S, Uemoto S. Significance of lymph node micrometastasis in pN0 hilar bile duct carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:208–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]