Abstract
Routine anaerobic subcultures of macroscopically negative blood culture bottles, performed within 1 day of receipt of the culture and after 5 days of incubation, were evaluated. Anaerobes were recovered from 207 (12.3%) of the total 1,688 positive cultures and, of these, 154 were only detected macroscopically, 11 only by subculture, and 42 by both procedures. In no instance was the anaerobe detected earlier with the subculture, and the time required for a definitive identification was reduced for only 10 isolates. Since the subcultures did not significantly improve the detection or early identification of anaerobes, routine anaerobic subcultures are not recommended.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25443/254437b3d77327835453c9e25b04247270da6af0" alt="427"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fa5f/8fa5fcb5aa61c7813996e2a9a69b561896631ca5" alt="428"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd6a7/fd6a7c4ebcb379ce7644c551c84a676256e7ff48" alt="429"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7e14/e7e14121b3e791a983bf203c9b5e67076a3da793" alt="430"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Blazevic D. J., Stemper J. E., Matsen J. M. Comparison of macroscopic examination, routine gram stains, and routine subcultures in the initial detection of positive blood cultures. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Mar;27(3):537–539. doi: 10.1128/am.27.3.537-539.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall M., Warren E., Washington J. A., 2nd Detection of bacteremia with liquid media containing sodium polyanetholsulfonate. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Jan;27(1):187–191. doi: 10.1128/am.27.1.187-191.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harkness J. L., Hall M., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd Effects of atmosphere of incubation and of routine subcultures on detection of bacteremia in vacuum blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Oct;2(4):296–299. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.4.296-299.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stargel D., Thompson F. S., Phillips S. E., Lombard G. L., Dowell V. R., Jr Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Mar;3(3):291–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.3.291-301.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Todd J. K., Roe M. H. Rapid detection of bacteremia by an early subculture technic. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Nov;64(5):694–699. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/64.5.694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Washington J. A., 2nd, Martin W. J. Comparison of three blood culture media for recovery of anaerobic bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Jan;25(1):70–71. doi: 10.1128/am.25.1.70-71.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson W. R., Martin W. J., Wilkowske C. J., Washington J. A., 2nd Anaerobic bacteremia. Mayo Clin Proc. 1972 Sep;47(9):639–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wüst J. Presumptive diagnosis of anaerobic bacteremia by gas-liquid chromatography of blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Dec;6(6):586–590. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.6.586-590.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young L. S., Martin W. J., Meyer R. D., Weinstein R. J., Anderson E. T. Gram-negative rod bacteremia: microbiologic, immunologic, and therapeutic considerations. Ann Intern Med. 1977 Apr;86(4):456–471. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-86-4-456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]