Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med. 2009 Aug 13;122(10):947–954. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.016

INFLAMMATION AND THROMBOSIS BIOMARKERS AND INCIDENT FRAILTY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN

Alexander P Reiner 1,2, Aaron K Aragaki 3, Shelly L Gray 4, Jean Wactawski-Wende 5, Jane A Cauley 6, Barbara B Cochrane 7,8, Charles L Kooperberg 9,10, Nancy F Woods 11, Andrea Z LaCroix 12,13
PMCID: PMC2754604  NIHMSID: NIHMS128062  PMID: 19682668

Abstract

Background

The immune and blood coagulation systems have been implicated in the pathophysiology of the geriatric syndrome of frailty, but limited prospective data examining the relationship of clotting/inflammation biomarkers to risk of incident frailty exists.

Methods

This prospective analysis was derived from a nested case-control study within the Women's Health Initiative. Among women 65-79 years free of frailty at enrollment, we randomly selected 900 incident cases from those developing frailty within 3 years; 900 non-frail controls were individually matched on age, ethnicity, and blood collection date. Biomarkers assessed for risk of incident frailty included fibrinogen, factor VIII, D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA).

Results

When examined by quartiles in multivariable adjusted models, higher D-dimer and t-PA levels were each associated with increased risk of frailty (p trend=0.04). Relative to the lowest quartile, the odds ratios for frailty compared to the upper quartile were 1.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-2.22] for t-PA and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.11-2.22) for D-dimer. For women having high t-PA and high D-dimer compared to women having lower levels of both biomarkers, the odds of frailty was 2.20 (1.29-3.75). There was little evidence for association between coagulation factor VIII, fibrinogen, CRP, or IL-6 levels and incident frailty.

Conclusions

This prospective analysis supports the role of markers of fibrin turnover and fibrinolysis as independent predictors of incident frailty in post-menopausal women.

Keywords: frailty, D-dimer, tissue plasminogen activator, Women's Health Initiative

INTRODUCTION

Frailty in older adults is defined as a syndrome consisting of involuntary weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slowness, and weakness. The syndrome of frailty is associated with increased vulnerability to aging-related diseases and mortality [1,2]. The pathophysiology of frailty is not well understood, but multiple physiological systems appear to be involved, including activation of immune/inflammation and blood coagulation systems [3].

In cross-sectional analyses, frailty and functional decline have been associated with increased markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis, and inflammation such as factor VIII, fibrinogen, and D-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin complex, factor XI α1-antitrypsin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), total white blood count, and circulating T-lymphocytes expressing C-C chemokine receptor-5 [4-10]. In an experimental mouse model of pro-inflammatory pathway activation due to deficiency of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10, muscle weakness and higher IL-6 levels developed more rapidly with increasing age compared to control mice [11]. The connection between blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, and frailty is further supported by the recent report that community-dwelling older adults with frailty are at moderately increased risk of developing idiopathic venous thrombo-embolic disease [12].

While most existing reports support a cross-sectional relationship between hemostasis and inflammation markers and frailty, few prospective studies have examined the ability of biomarkers measured at baseline to predict incident frailty events during follow-up. In a recent prospective analysis of the Cardiovascular Health Study, baseline CRP level, and to a lesser extent white blood count and factor VIII levels, were associated with an increased risk of incident frailty during follow-up [13]. Here, we examined the association of coagulation and fibrinolysis biomarkers measured at baseline enrollment and risk of incident frailty in postmenopausal women from Women's Health Initiative-Observational Study (WHI-OS). In addition to CRP, IL-6, and factor VIII, our analysis included fibrinogen, D-dimer, and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), which have not previously assessed prospectively with respect to incident frailty.

METHODS

Study Sample

The WHI-OS is a prospective study of 93,676 women ages 50-79 recruited from 1993 through 1998 from 40 clinical centers in the United States. Study details have been described previously [14,15]. Women were eligible for WHI-OS if they were postmenopausal, unlikely to relocate or die within 3 years, and not enrolled in any of the WHI clinical trials. The study was reviewed and approved by human subjects review committees at each participating institution. All women provided written informed consent.

The participants for the current analysis were derived from a nested case-control study of incident frailty nested within the WHI-OS. Women were considered eligible if they were at least 65 years old and not frail at study enrollment (see below for definition of frailty in WHI-OS), and did not report at baseline a diagnosis or disease that can manifest as frailty (Parkinson disease, severe autoimmune disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, or use of antidepressant medications). Cases and controls were additionally excluded if they developed cardiovascular disease or cancer events during follow-up within four years of enrollment. A total of 25,378 WHI-OS women were eligible. Cases of frailty (n=900) were randomly selected from the 3,453 WHI-OS participants who developed incident frailty by year 3 follow-up contact. Controls (n=900) were selected from 15,198 participants with a WHI-OS frailty score of 0 (zero) at year 3 of follow-up, and were matched to cases on age (+/- 1 year), ethnicity, and date of blood collection, using a 1:1 matching ratio.

Definition of Frailty in WHI-OS

The frailty phenotype developed in the WHI cohort was based on the criteria used by Fried and colleagues [1] and has been found to be strongly associated with future mortality, disability, hospitalization and hip fracture among older women in the WHI-OS [2]. Definition of the frailty phenotype in WHI was based on 5 component criteria (weakness, slowness, exhaustion, low physical activity and unintended weight loss). Since physical performance measures were not available in WHI-OS, the CHS definition was modified to include the Rand-36 physical function scale [16], which was used as a self-report indicator of muscle weakness and slow walking speed. The Rand-36 Vitality Scale (range 0-100) was used to measure exhaustion using four items pertaining to the past 4 weeks: “Did you feel …. worn out?; tired?; full of pep?; have a lot of energy?”. Low physical activity was classified using a questionnaire that assessed weekly frequency and duration of four speeds of walking and activities. Kilocalories of energy expended in a week on leisure time activity was calculated (MET score = kcal/wk * kg). A dichotomous variable was created indicating unintentional weight loss of >5% of body weight in the past 2 years, based on measured weight at the baseline and 3-year clinic visits in combination with a self-reported item on whether recent weight loss was intentional at the 3-year follow-up. For each measure described above, a frailty component was classified as present if the participant had a score in the lowest quartile of the distribution for that component or unintentional weight loss. To align the scoring with the frailty measure developed in CHS, poor physical function was scored as two points because both the muscle strength and walking ability components were measured by this scale. We then summed the number of frailty components that were present, yielding a range of 0-5, and used a threshold score of ≥3 to create a dichotomous outcome of incident frailty.

Potential Confounders

Data on demographic (race/ethnicity, age, education), medical history, and health behavior characteristics were obtained by self-report in the WHI-OS at baseline. Smoking status was classified as current, past, or never. Medical conditions at baseline included self-reported physician diagnosis of arthritis, treated diabetes, hypertension (on medication and/or blood pressure >140/90 mmHg), cancer, Parkinson disease, autoimmune disease, multiple sclerosis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Body mass index (BMI) was defined using measured height and weight at baseline as weight (kg) divided by height (m2). Depressive symptoms were assessed by an eight-item short form [17] of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [18]. Postmenopausal hormone therapy use was ascertained by interview and categorized as current, past, or never use of any estrogen with or without progestin. Other medication use was assessed by having participants bring all current medications taken on a regular basis to their first screening interview. Clinic interviewers entered each medication name and strength directly from the containers into a database that assigned drug codes using Medi-Span software (First DataBank, Inc., San Bruno, CA). During follow-up, incident cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, definite or possible coronary death, angina, revascularization, carotid artery disease, congestive heart failure, and stroke) were ascertained, initially by annual self-report and confirmed through medical record review and adjudication by local clinic physicians and finally by a panel of central adjudicators.

Laboratory assays

Plasma biomarker assays were performed at the University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine on aliquots of citrated plasma (fibrinogen, factor VIII, D-dimer) or EDTA plasma (CRP, IL-6, t-PA) that had been collected at a single time point during the baseline WHI examination, processed under standard protocols, and stored at -80°C. High-sensitivity CRP was measured by immunonephelometry (BNII, Dade-Behring). Plasma fibrinogen and factor VIII activity were measured on an automated hemostasis analyzer (STA Compact; Diagnostica Stago, Parsippany, NJ) using the modified thrombin time method (Clauss assay) and 1-stage clotting time assay, respectively. For the factor VIII assay, values are reported as a percentage of normal plasma pool. Quantitative D-dimer and t-PA levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Asserachrom D-Di, Diagnostica Stago). IL-6 was measured using a commercial BioSource high-sensitivity ELISA kit (InVitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to manufacture's instructions; the limit of detection for the IL-6 assay was 0.02 pg/mL.

Among the 1,800 study participants, the number of participants with missing biomarkers values were 7 (0.4%) for fibrinogen, 7 (0.4%) for factor VIII, 7 (0.4%) for D-dimer, 8 (0.4%) for t-PA, 38 (2.1%) for IL-6, and 41 (2.3%) for CRP. A large number (847 or 47%) of participants had values below the detectable limit of the IL-6 immunoassay. One participant had a t-PA value of 153 mg/mL (over 6 times higher than the next highest), and was excluded from the t-PA analyses. Eight participants (0.4%) had fibrinogen <100 mg/dL and 42 (2.3%) of participants had factor VIII <30%. To account for the possibility that some of these fibrinogen or factor VIII levels were spuriously low due to clot formation or sample degradation, we performed sensitivity analyses excluding these 50 subjects.

Statistical Analysis

Baseline demographic, medical, and health behavior characteristics were compared for women according to quartile of biomarker levels and by case-control status. Corresponding p values were based on chi-squared tests of association. Mean biomarker levels were compared between incident frailty cases and controls using paired t-tests. We also visually assessed the relationship between biomarkers and risk of incident frailty by fitting generalized additive models with biomarker levels as a continuous variable (log10 scale) using splines and after adjusting for age, ethnicity, hypertension, hormone use, BMI, education, alcohol consumption, arthritis and smoking.

To formally test the relationship between biomarkers and risk of incident frailty, conditional logistic regression, matching on case control pairs, was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. This analytic approach, in the context of a matched case-control design, can be considered an adaptation of the Cox proportional hazards failure time model. Assessment of linear trend was approached by dividing the population into quartiles according to cut-points determined using the control distribution for each biomarker and calculating odds ratios for each quartile relative to the lowest quartile. Because of the large number of participants with undetectable IL-6 levels (<0.02 pg/mL), we performed a categorical analysis using tertiles, comparing individuals with values ≥1.0 pg/mL and those with values between 0.02 and 1.0 pg/mL to the baseline category of <0.02 pg/mL. For each biomarker, we fit two covariate-adjusted regression models. Model 1 adjusted for hypertension, hormone use, BMI, and matched on case-control pair (minimally-adjusted model). Model 2 adjusted for these covariates as well as education, alcohol consumption, arthritis, smoking and matched on case-control pair (fully-adjusted model). For any statistically significant results, a sensitivity analysis was performed by stratifying the risk of frailty according to baseline use of medications with anti-inflammatory and/or anti-coagulant properties [angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, statins, nonstatin anti-hyperlipidemics, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and warfarin]. In additional sensitivity analyses, we adjusted our regression models for baseline use of any sedating medication (benzodiazepines, hypnotics, opioids, anti-psychotics, or neuroleptics), and all of our results were essentially unchanged.

In post-hoc analyses, for each biomarker found to be individually associated with frailty (t-PA and D-dimer), we assessed whether the risk of incident frailty associated with the combination of the two biomarkers was greater than the risk associated with each biomarker individually. We divided participants into 4 categories: those being in the upper quartile distribution for both biomarkers, those being in the upper quartile for one biomarker but not the other, and the baseline category of being in the upper quartile for neither biomarker. A 3 degree of freedom chi-squared test was performed to test risk differences across the 4 categories.

RESULTS

Of the baseline characteristics examined (Table 1), lower education, obesity, current smoking, infrequent alcohol consumption, worse health status, more depressive symptoms, diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, NSAID and statin use were more common among frailty cases than controls (p≤0.01). Cross-sectional univariate analyses of baseline characteristics in the 900 non-frail control women according to quartile of plasma biomarker levels showed significant associations (p≤0.01) of: (1) age with higher D-dimer, factor VIII, and t-PA; (2) BMI with higher CRP and t-PA; (3) HT use with higher CRP, fibrinogen and t-PA; (4) hypertension with higher CRP and t-PA; and (5) alcohol consumption with higher fibrinogen.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristic of WHI Observational Study participants vs. Incident Frailty

Frail cases Non-frail controls
N % N % P-Value
Age group at screening, years 60-69 485 53.9 485 53.9 1.00
70-79 415 46.1 415 46.1 .
Education 0-8 years 12 1.3 6 0.7 <0.001
Some high school 34 3.8 17 1.9 .
High school diploma/GED 192 21.5 135 15.1
School after high school 341 38.2 342 38.2 .
College degree or higher 314 35.2 395 44.1 .
Ethnicity White 865 96.1 865 96.1 1.00
Black 16 1.8 16 1.8 .
Hispanic 2 0.2 2 0.2 .
Asian/Pacific Islander 15 1.7 15 1.7 .
Unknown 2 0.2 2 0.2 .
Body mass index (BMI), kg/m2 (full categories) Underweight (< 18.5) 4 0.4 14 1.6 <0.001
Normal (18.5 - 24.9) 271 30.2 461 51.5 .
Overweight (25.0 - 29.9) 352 39.3 320 35.8 .
Obesity I (30.0 - 34.9) 188 21.0 86 9.6 .
Obesity II (35.0 - 39.9) 55 6.1 10 1.1 .
Extreme Obesity III (>= 40) 26 2.9 4 0.4 .
Smoking Never 472 52.9 478 53.7 0.005
Past 360 40.4 382 42.9 .
Current 60 6.7 30 3.4 .
Alcohol Non/past drinker 272 30.3 200 22.3 <0.001
<1 drink/week 314 35.0 251 28.0 .
1-14 drinks/week 271 30.2 404 45.1 .
> 14 drinks/week 41 4.6 40 4.5 .
HT Usage Status Never used 378 42.0 400 44.5 0.48
Past user 129 14.3 131 14.6 .
Current user 393 43.7 368 40.9 .
Depressive Mood 0 167 18.7 325 36.6 <0.001
1-2 367 41.2 356 40.1 .
3-4 215 24.1 150 16.9 .
5+ 142 15.9 57 6.4 .
Activity of daily living disability No 869 98.5 878 99.1 0.27
Yes 13 1.5 8 0.9 .
Treated diabetes (pills or shots) No 862 95.8 888 98.8 <0.001
Yes 38 4.2 11 1.2 .
Hypertensive No 448 49.9 564 62.7 <0.001
Yes 450 50.1 336 37.3 .
History of arthritis No 330 36.7 529 58.8 <0.001
Yes 570 63.3 371 41.2 .
History of hip fracture at age 55 or older No 805 98.9 825 99.8 0.03
Yes 9 1.1 2 0.2 .
Number of falls in last 12 months None 605 67.3 643 71.6 0.02
1 time 170 18.9 171 19.0 .
2 times 81 9.0 61 6.8 .
3 or more times 43 4.8 23 2.6 .
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Use No 816 90.7 844 93.8 0.01
Yes 84 9.3 56 6.2 .
Non-statin Antihyperlipidemic Medication Use No 882 98.0 888 98.7 0.27
Yes 18 2.0 12 1.3 .
Statin Use No 798 88.7 835 92.8 0.003
Yes 102 11.3 65 7.2 .
NSAID use No 521 57.9 588 65.3 0.001
Yes 379 42.1 312 34.7 .
Coumarin Anticoagulant Use No 889 98.8 898 99.8 0.01
Yes 11 1.2 2 0.2 .

In both minimally-adjusted and fully-adjusted regression models, women with t-PA or D-dimer levels in the upper quartile were at increased risk of incident frailty relative to women in the lowest respective quartiles; women in the second and third quartiles were at intermediate risk (Table 2). The trend p-values associated with D-dimer and t-PA were each p=0.04 for the fully adjusted models. Women with IL-6 levels ≥1 pg/mL and those with detectable IL-6 levels less than 1 pg/mL had a higher risk of frailty than women with undetectable IL-6 levels in the minimally-adjusted model (p=0.03), but the frailty-IL-6 association became non-significant upon further covariate adjustment (p=0.27). Baseline levels of CRP, fibrinogen and factor VIII were not significantly associated with incident frailty in either minimally- or fully-adjusted models. Restricting the analysis to subjects with factor VIII levels >30% and fibrinogen levels >100 did not appreciably alter these results.

Table 2.

Risk of frailty by quartile of inflammation and coagulation biomarkers

Biomarker Quartile Model 1 Odds Ratio (95% CI) Model 2 Odds Ratio (95% CI)

C-reactive protein Q1 [< 1.1 mg/L] 1 1

C-reactive protein Q2 [1.1, 2.3 mg/L] 1.12 (0.80 - 1.56) 1.24 (0.84 - 1.81)

C-reactive protein Q3 [2.3, 4.8 mg/L] 1.13 (0.81 - 1.58) 1.14 (0.78 - 1.65)

C-reactive protein Q4 [>= 4.8 mg/L] 1.15 (0.82 - 1.62) 1.05 (0.72 - 1.54)

P for trend 0.43 0.95

D-dimer Q1 [< 0.24 ug/mL] 1 1

D-dimer Q2 [0.24, 0.36 ug/mL] 1.14 (0.84 - 1.56) 1.27 (0.90 - 1.79)

D-dimer Q3 [0.36, 0.61 ug/mL] 1.10 (0.81 - 1.49) 1.05 (0.75 - 1.48)

D-dimer Q4 [>= 0.61 ug/mL] 1.37 (1.00 - 1.88) 1.57 (1.11 - 2.22)

P for trend 0.07 0.04

Factor VIII Q1 [<64%] 1 1

Factor VIII Q2 [64, 90%] 1.22 (0.90 - 1.64) 1.17 (0.84 - 1.64)

Factor VIII Q3 [90, 116%] 1.05 (0.76 - 1.44) 1.05 (0.74 - 1.48)

Factor VIII Q4 [>=116%] 1.02 (0.73 - 1.42) 1.10 (0.76 - 1.59)

P for trend 0.72 0.84

Fibrinogen Q1 [<261 mg/dL] 1 1

Fibrinogen Q2 [261, 305 mg/dL] 0.71 (0.52 - 0.97) 0.70 (0.49 - 1.00)

Fibrinogen Q3 [305, 352 mg/dL] 0.91 (0.66 - 1.25) 0.96 (0.67 - 1.36)

Fibrinogen Q4 [>= 352 mg/dL] 0.95 (0.69 - 1.31) 0.93 (0.64 - 1.34)

P for trend 0.79 0.80

tissue plasminogen activator Q1 [< 6 mg/mL] 1 1

tissue plasminogen activator Q2 [6, 8 mg/mL] 1.14 (0.83 - 1.57) 1.23 (0.87 - 1.75)

tissue plasminogen activator Q3 [8, 10.3 mg/mL] 1.10 (0.80 - 1.51) 1.20 (0.84 - 1.72)

tissue plasminogen activator Q4 [>= 10.3 mg/mL] 1.48 (1.05 - 2.07) 1.52 (1.05 - 2.22)
P for trend 0.03 0.04

INTERLEUKIN-6 (0 pg/mL) 1 1

INTERLEUKIN-6 (0 < 1 pg/mL) 1.07 (0.74, 1.54) 0.97 (0.64, 1.45)

INTERLEUKIN-6 ( ≥1 pg/mL) 1.41 (1.00, 1.98) 1.20 (0.82, 1.76)

P for trend 0.03 0.27

Model 1 adjusted for hypertension, hormone use, and body mass index.

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 covariates + education, alcohol consumption, hypertension, arthritis, and smoking.

Additional sensitivity analyses were performed by stratifying the fully-adjusted frailty-biomarker models for D-dimer and t-PA according to baseline use of any anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant medication, including ACE inhibitors, statins, non-statin anti-hyperlipidemics, NSAIDs, and/or warfarin. The frailty odds ratios by quartile of biomarker level were similar to those described above. For example, among the 936 (52%) participants not using anti-inflammatory or anti-coagulant medications, the frailty odds ratio for the highest quartile of D-dimer was 1.81 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12 - 2.91] compared to women in the lowest quartile of D-dimer. Similarly, among non-medication users, the frailty odd ratio associated with the highest quartile of tPA was 1.52 (95% CI, 0.93 - 2.50) compared to women in the lowest quartile of t-PA. There was no significant interaction between either D-dimer or t-PA and anti-inflammatory/anti-coagulant medication use on risk of frailty (p-values for interaction = 0.47 and 0.42, respectively).

Since D-dimer and t-PA measure different aspects of the blood coagulation and fibrinolysis pathways, and circulating levels were uncorrelated with one another among non-frail WHI-OS controls (Spearman's ρ = -0.04), we additionally explored whether the combination of high D-dimer and high t-PA levels was associated with a greater risk of frailty compared to each biomarker individually (Table 3). In the fully adjusted regression model, women in the upper quartile for t-PA only had a 1.3-fold increased risk of frailty and women in the upper quartile for D-dimer only had a 1.4-fold increased risk of frailty, compared to women with low levels of both markers. For women in the upper quartile of both t-PA and D-dimer, the risk of incident frailty was even larger (odds ratio, 2.2). While there was some overlap in the confidence intervals for these risk estimates, the combined effect of t-PA and D-dimer levels on risk frailty was significantly greater than the effect of each biomarker individually (p=0.02).

Table 3.

Risk of frailty comparing levels of D-dimer and/or tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) in the upper range of the distribution

Biomarker Quartile Model 1 Odds Ratio (95% CI) Model 2 Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Neither D-dimer nor t-PA in the upper quartile 1 1
Only t-PA in the upper quartile 1.38 (1.05, 1.82) 1.29 (0.94, 1.76)
Only D-dimer in the upper quartile 1.30 (0.97, 1.74) 1.38 (0.99, 1.91)
Both D-dimer and t-PA in the upper quartile 1.90 (1.17, 3.08) 2.20 (1.29, 3.75)
Overall P-value(3-df of freedom test) 0.02 0.02

Model 1 adjusted for hypertension, hormone use, and body mass index.

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 covariates + education, alcohol consumption, hypertension, arthritis, and smoking.

COMMENT

In a nested case-control of study of incident frailty in post-menopausal women, higher levels of the coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers D-dimer and t-PA were each associated with increased risk of frailty at 3-year follow-up. The associations between frailty and D-dimer or t-PA were independent of the potential confounding effects of co-morbid conditions and lifestyle factors that are also associated with increased coagulation and inflammation biomarkers levels and frailty. To our knowledge, a prospective association between D-dimer and t-PA and incident frailty have not been previously reported. Moreover, the combined effects of high D-dimer and high t-PA on risk of incident frailty were greater than the risk associated with either biomarker alone. The risks of frailty associated with D-dimer and t-PA were not modified by baseline use of medications with anticoagulant or anti-inflammatory properties. Finally, we observed little evidence for association between coagulation factor VIII, fibrinogen, CRP, or IL-6 levels and development of frailty.

Studies of older adults consistently support associations between markers of thrombosis and inflammation and measures of disability, physical performance, or frailty [4-12]. However, most previous studies assessing the outcome of frailty were cross-sectional analyses, in which the temporal relationships underlying the observed associations are more difficult to tease apart. To our knowledge, there has been one other prospective analysis examining the relationship of biomarkers measured at baseline to development of incident frailty during follow-up in CHS [13]. In the report by Barzilay et al, CRP and insulin resistance were associated with increased risk of incident frailty in CHS independently of potential confounders, while coagulation factor VIII levels had a borderline significant association [13]. The lack of association between CRP and incident frailty in the WHI-OS may reflect differences in gender, and/or other study population characteristics between women from WHI compared to men and women from CHS. D-dimer and t-PA were not evaluated in the analysis of incident frailty by Barzilay et al [13], though higher D-dimer levels were previously reported to be increased with baseline frailty in a cross-sectional analysis from CHS [5]. Therefore, additional prospective studies of older adults are required to confirm the role of D-dimer and t-PA as independent risk factors for incident frailty.

D-dimer results from fibrin formation and degradation, and is a marker of activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems. Fibrinolytic activity is largely regulated by tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) released from endothelial cells and by a circulating inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-I). t-PA antigen measures free, active t-PA and t-PA complexed to PAI-1. Therefore, t-PA and D-dimer each summarize different components of the coagulation/fibrinolytic systems. Both t-PA antigen and D-dimer levels increase with age [19, 20] and have been reported to predict future venous thromboembolic [21] and arterial thrombotic events [22,23] independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Together with a recent report that frailty predicts increased risk of idiopathic venous thrombotic events [12], the current WHI findings support a possible pathophysiologic connection between aging, activation of the blood coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, and occurrence of frailty. The association between D-dimer and t-PA and development of frailty in post-menopausal women from WHI was present in women without clinical cardiovascular disease, as women with overt cardiovascular disease were excluded from our analyses. Since frailty has been correlated with extent of underlying atherosclerotic disease [24], studies that include subclinical non-invasive measures of vascular disease are needed to more accurately assess the inter-relationships among coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers, vascular disease, and frailty.

Frailty has been conceptualized as a pathophysiologic state of global functional decline characterized by increased vulnerability to acute and chronic physical and psychosocial stressors due to impaired homeostatic mechanisms. Acute or chronic stress contributes to activation of the coagulation system and impaired fibrinolysis including increases in circulating levels of D-dimer and t-PA [25-28]. Therefore D-dimer and t-PA might hasten the clinical transition to frailty or other aging-related disorders in susceptible older individuals who experience sustained or repeated physical or psychosocial trauma, stress or injury or “allostatic load” [29].

Strengths of the current study include the use of a prospective study design in which we assessed incident cases of frailty that occurred subsequent to measurement of the biomarkers. While we excluded women with chronic diseases that manifest as frailty and also performed sensitivity analyses according to use of medications with anti-inflammatory and/or anti-coagulant properties, we cannot fully exclude the possibility that residual confounding due to unmeasured factors, such as subclinical atherosclerosis [24], may account for the observed frailty-biomarker associations. Since our study population comprised post-menopausal women of predominantly white race, whether the associations with t-PA and D-dimer with incident frailty are generalizable to men and other ethnic groups also requires additional study.

Other study limitations include the relatively short follow-up duration and lack of objective physical performance measurements of muscle weakness and walking speed, which may be prone to error. Nonetheless, our `modified definition' of frailty has been validated previously through strong association with future mortality, disability, hospitalization, and hip fracture events among older women in the WHI-OS [2]. Due to assay and/or plasma specimen issues that we were not able to fully resolve, a sizeable proportion of our study participants had undetectable IL-6 levels; thus, our ability to assess the risk of frailty with IL-6 was limited, and longitudinal assessment of IL-6 in other frail populations is warranted.

In summary, plasma levels of D-dimer and t-PA, two markers of fibrin turnover and fibrinolysis, were associated prospectively with risk of incident frailty in post-menopausal women. These findings support the role of activation of coagulation and fibrinolytic systems in the pathophysiology and occurrence of frailty in older adults. If these results are confirmed in other study populations, screening of D-dimer and t-PA may be useful for identifying otherwise healthy older individuals at risk for developing frailty or other functional consequence of aging.

Acknowledgments

The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. A full listing of WHI investigators can be found at http://www.whiscience.org/publications/WHI_investigators_shortlist.pdf. This article was supported by grant #R01 AG025441 to Dr. LaCroix from the National Institute of Aging.

Funding Source: Supported by R01 grant AG025441 from the National Institute of Aging (to Dr. LaCroix).

Clinical Significance

  • In post-menopausal women, higher levels of the coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers D-dimer and t-PA were associated with increased risk of incident frailty.

  • The combined effects of high D-dimer and high t-PA on risk of incident frailty were greater than the risk associated with either biomarker alone.

  • Markers of fibrin turnover and fibrinolysis may serve as independent predictors of incident frailty in post-menopausal women.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2001;56A:M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Woods NF, LaCroix AZ, Gray SL, et al. Frailty: emergence and consequences in women ages 65 and older in The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(8):1321–1330. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferrucci L, et al. Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(6):991–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00745.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cohen HJ, Harris T, Pieper CF. Coagulation and activation of inflammatory pathways in the development of functional decline and mortality in the elderly. Am J Med. 2003;114(3):180–7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01484-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Walston J, McBurnie MA, Newman A, Tracy RP, Kop WJ, Hirsch CH, Gottdiener J, Fried LP. Cardiovascular Health Study. Frailty and activation of the inflammation and coagulation systems with and without clinical comorbidities: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 11;162(20):2333–41. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.20.2333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ferrucci L, Harris TB, Guralnik JM, et al. Serum IL-6 and the development of disability in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(6):639–646. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ferrucci L, Penninx BW, Volpato S, et al. Change in muscle strength explains accelerated decline of physical function in older women with high interleukin-6 serum levels. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(12):1947–1954. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Penninx BW, Kritchevsky SB, Newman AB, et al. Inflammatory markers and incident mobility limitation in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(7):1105–1113. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52308.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leng SX, Xue QL, Tian J, Walston JD, Fried LP. Inflammation and frailty in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(6):864–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.De Fanis U, Wang GC, Fedarko NS, Walston JD, Casolaro V, Leng SX. T-lymphocytes expressing CC chemokine receptor-5 are increased in frail older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(5):904–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01673.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Walston J, Fedarko N, Yang H, Leng S, Beamer B, Espinoza S, Lipton A, Zheng H, Becker K. The physical and biological characterization of a frail mouse model. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(4):391–8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.4.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Folsom AR, Boland LL, Cushman M, Heckbert SR, Rosamond WD, Walston JD. Frailty and risk of venous thromboembolism in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(1):79–82. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.1.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barzilay JI, Blaum C, Moore T, Xue QL, Hirsch CH, Walston JD, Fried LP. Insulin resistance and inflammation as precursors of frailty: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(7):635–41. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.7.635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Langer RD, White E, Lewis CE, Kotchen JM, Hendrix SL, Trevisan M. The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(9 suppl):S107–S121. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(03)00047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Women's Health Initiative Study Group Design of the Women's Health Initiative Clinical Trial and Observational Study. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:61–109. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00078-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 Health Econ. 1993;2(3):217–227. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tuunainen A, Langer RD, Klauber MR, Kripke DF. Short version of the CES-D (Burnam screen) for depression in reference to the structured psychiatric interview. Psychiatry Res. 2001;103(23):261–270. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00278-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mari D, Coppola R, Provenzano R. Hemostasis factors and aging. Exp Gerontol. 2008 Feb;43(2):66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2007.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rumley A, Emberson JR, Wannamethee SG, Lennon L, Whincup PH, Lowe GD. Effects of older age on fibrin D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and other hemostatic and inflammatory variables in men aged 60-79 years. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(5):982–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cushman M, Folsom AR, Wang L, Aleksic N, Rosamond WD, Tracy RP, Heckbert SR. Fibrin fragment D-dimer and the risk of future venous thrombosis. Blood. 2003;101(4):1243–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-05-1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lowe GD, Danesh J, Lewington S, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Rumley A, Whincup PH. Tissue plasminogen activator antigen and coronary heart disease. Prospective study and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(3):252–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Appleby P, Rumley A, Lowe GD. Fibrin D-dimer and coronary heart disease: prospective study and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2001;103(19):2323–7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.19.2323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Newman AB, Gottdiener JS, Mcburnie MA, Hirsch CH, Kop WJ, Tracy R, Walston JD, Fried LP. Cardiovascular Health Study Research Group. Associations of subclinical cardiovascular disease with frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M158–66. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thrall G, Lane D, Carroll D, Lip GY. A systematic review of the effects of acute psychological stress and physical activity on haemorheology, coagulation, fibrinolysis and platelet reactivity: Implications for the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes. Thromb Res. 2007;120(6):819–47. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.von Känel R, Dimsdale JE, Mills PJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Patterson TL, Mausbach BT, Grant I. Effect of Alzheimer caregiving stress and age on frailty markers interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(9):963–9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.9.963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mausbach BT, von Känel R, Aschbacher K, Roepke SK, Dimsdale JE, Ziegler MG, Mills PJ, Patterson TL, Ancoli-Israel S, Grant I. Spousal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease show longitudinal increases in plasma level of tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen. Psychosom Med. 2007;69(8):816–22. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318157d461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Matys T, Pawlak R, Matys E, Pavlides C, McEwen BS, Strickland S. Tissue plasminogen activator promotes the effects of corticotropin-releasing factor on the amygdala and anxiety-like behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(46):16345–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407355101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McEwen BS. Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: Understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008 Apr 7;583(23):174–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES