Skip to main content
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 2004 Spring;27(1):113–116. doi: 10.1007/BF03392097

A reply to Leigland's “Is a new version of philosophical pragmatism necessary? A reply to Barnes-Holmes”

Dermot Barnes-Holmes
PMCID: PMC2755366  PMID: 22478422

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnes-Holmes D. Behavioral pragmatism: no place for reality and truth. Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;23(2):191–202. doi: 10.1007/BF03392010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes D., Roche B. Mechanistic ontology and contextualistic epistemology: A contradiction within behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1994 Spring;17(1):165–168. doi: 10.1007/BF03392662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hayes S. C., Brownstein A. J. Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. Behav Anal. 1986 Fall;9(2):175–190. doi: 10.1007/BF03391944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Leigland Sam. Is a new version of philosophical pragmatism necessary? A reply to Barnes-Holmes. Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;26(2):297–304. doi: 10.1007/BF03392083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roche Bryan, Barnes-Holmes Dermot. Behavior analysis and social constructionism: some points of contact and departure. Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;26(2):215–231. doi: 10.1007/BF03392077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES