Skip to main content
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 2004 Fall;27(2):133–151. doi: 10.1007/BF03393175

Individual behavior, culture, and social change

Sigrid S Glenn
PMCID: PMC2755396  PMID: 22478424

Abstract

The principle of operant selection is examined as a prototype of cultural selection, and the role of the social environment is suggested as the critical element in the emergence of cultural phenomena. Operant contingencies are compared to cultural selection contingencies, designated as metacontingencies. Both of these types of contingency relations result in evolving lineages of recurrences that can become increasingly complex in the number and organization of their elements. In addition to its role in the recurring interlocking behavioral contingencies that constitute cultural organization, operant behavior plays another role in cultures. Although the operants of individuals are functionally independent of one another, the behavior of each person may contribute to a cumulative effect that is relevant to the well-being of many people. Similarly, the outcomes of metacontingencies may also contribute to a cumulative effect. The relation between independently evolving operant lineages, or between independently evolving cultural lineages, and their cumulative effect is identified as a macrocontingency. Macrocontingencies do not involve cultural-level selection per se. Effective cultural engineering requires identifying the macrocontingencies that produce less than desirable effects and altering the relevant operant contingencies or metacontingencies to produce change in the cumulative effects.

Keywords: operant contingencies, macrocontingencies, metacontingencies, cultural selection, operant selection

Full text

PDF
133

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Friman Patrick C. Up with this I shall not put: 10 reasons why I disagree with Branch and Vollmer on behavior used as a count noun. Behav Anal. 2004 Spring;27(1):99–106. doi: 10.1007/BF03392095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Glenn S. S. Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. Behav Anal. 1988 Fall;11(2):161–179. doi: 10.1007/BF03392470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1243–1248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hull D. L., Langman R. E., Glenn S. S. A general account of selection: biology, immunology, and behavior. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Jun;24(3):511–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Layng T. V., Andronis P. T. Toward a functional analysis of delusional speech and hallucinatory behavior. Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;7(2):139–156. doi: 10.1007/BF03391897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Skinner B. F. The evolution of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):217–221. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES