Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior logoLink to The Analysis of Verbal Behavior
. 2000;17:105–128. doi: 10.1007/BF03392959

Selection-based versus topography-based responding: An important distinction for stimulus equivalence?

David A D Polson, Joseph A Parsons
PMCID: PMC2755447  PMID: 22477217

Abstract

English-speaking subjects were taught 16 English-French word pairs. Within any given trial, one word from each pair was presented; for eight items, subjects were to select its counterpart from an array of words in the other language (selection-based training), and for the other eight items there was no array and subjects were to type its counterpart (topography-based training). In Experiment 1, all items were trained from French to English, and later, interspersed no-feedback probe trials tested for the emergence of the reversed relations. Half of the eight selection-trained items were tested in the selection-based mode and half were tested in the topography-based mode; similarly, half of the eight topography-trained items were tested in the selection-based mode and half were tested in the topography-based mode. On the first reversal test trial, all 7 subjects scored 100% correct for the selection-tested items; in contrast, 5 of the 7 subjects scored 0% or near 0% correct for the topography-tested items, which improved to varying degrees with repeated testing. The training response mode affected neither acquisition rate nor reversal test trial performance. In Experiment 2, all items were tested in the topography-based mode only, and subjects were exposed to nine consecutive reversal test trials prior to interspersed probe testing. Improved accuracy across reversal test trials was not observed until the conditions of probe testing were instated, an indication that reexposure to the trained relations was a crucial component of delayed emergence. In Experiment 3, all items were trained from English to French, resulting in subjects typing a familiar rather than an unfamiliar word on reversal test trials. Accuracy on reversal test trials was considerably better than in the previous two experiments. We discuss the implications of our findings for stimulus equivalence research.

Full text

PDF
105

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLOUGH D. S. Delayed matching in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Apr;2:151–160. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bush K. M., Sidman M., de Rose T. Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):29–45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cuvo A. J., Riva M. T. Generalization and transfer between comprehension and production: a comparison of retarded and nonretarded persons. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Summer;13(2):315–331. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Devany J. M., Hayes S. C., Nelson R. O. Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):243–257. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dougher M. J., Augustson E., Markham M. R., Greenway D. E., Wulfert E. The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):331–351. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FELDMAN S. M., UNDERWOOD B. J. Stimulus recall following paired-associate learning. J Exp Psychol. 1957 Jan;53(1):11–15. doi: 10.1037/h0048386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gatch M. B., Osborne J. G. Transfer of contextual stimulus function via equivalence class development. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):369–378. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horne P. J., Lowe C. F. On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185–241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. JANTZ E. M., UNDERWOOD B. J. R-S learning as a function of meaningfulness and degree of S-R learning. J Exp Psychol. 1958 Aug;56(2):174–179. doi: 10.1037/h0047139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lane S. D., Critchfield T. S. Verbal self-reports of emergent relations in a stimulus equivalence procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):355–374. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lazar R. M., Davis-Lang D., Sanchez L. The formation of visual stimulus equivalences in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 May;41(3):251–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee V. L., Pegler A. M. Effects on spelling of training children to read. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Mar;37(2):311–322. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee V. L. Prepositional phrases spoken and heard. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):227–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lipkens R., Hayes S. C., Hayes L. J. Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Oct;56(2):201–239. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lowe C. F., Horne P. J. Reflections on naming and other symbolic behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):315–353. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lynch D. C., Cuvo A. J. Stimulus equivalence instruction of fraction-decimal relations. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):115–126. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Markham M. R., Dougher M. J. Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):529–542. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moerk E. L. Three-term contingency patterns in mother-child verbal interactions during first-language acquisition. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):293–305. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Polson D. A., Parsons J. A. Precurrent contingencies: Behavior reinforced by altering reinforcement probability for other behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):427–439. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Saunders R. R., Green G. Naming is not (necessary for) stimulus equivalence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):312–314. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sidman M., Cresson O., Jr Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. Am J Ment Defic. 1973 Mar;77(5):515–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sidman M., Cresson O., Jr, Willson-Morris M. Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):261–273. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sidman M., Kirk B., Willson-Morris M. Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):21–42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sidman M. Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5–13. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1401.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wulfert E., Hayes S. C. Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):125–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Analysis of Verbal Behavior are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES