Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Gut. 2008 Jan 25;57(5):634–641. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.137802

Genetically designing a more potent anti-pancreatic cancer agent by simultaneously cotargeting human IL-13 and EGF receptors in a mouse xenograft model

Daniel A Vallera 1, Brad J Stish 1, Yanqun Shu 1, Hua Chen 1, Ashok Saluja 2, Donald J Buchsbaum 3, Selwyn M Vickers 2
PMCID: PMC2756191  NIHMSID: NIHMS110307  PMID: 18222985

Abstract

Objective

Investigators are currently interested in the EGFR and IL-13R as potential targets in the development of new biologicals for pancreatic cancer. Attempts to develop successful agents have met with difficulty. Our novel approach was to simultaneously target these receptors with EGF and IL-13 cloned on the same bispecific single chain molecule with truncated diphtheria toxin (DT390) to determine if co-targeting with DTEGF13 had any advantages.

Design

Proliferation experiments were performed to measure the potency and selectivity of bispecific DTEGF13 and its monospecific counterparts against pancreatic cancer cell lines Panc-1 and MiaPaCa-2 in vitro. DTEGF13 was then administered intratumorally to nude mice with MiaPaCa-2 flank tumors to measure efficacy and toxicity (weight loss).

Results

In vitro, bispecific DTEGF13 was 2,800-fold more toxic than monospecific DTEGF or DTIL13 against Panc-1. A similar enhancement was observed in vitro when MiaPaCa-2 pancreatic cancer cells or H2981-T3 lung adenocarcinoma cells were studied. DTEGF13 activity was blockable with recombinant EGF13. DTEGF13 was potent (IC50 = 0.00017 nM) against MiaPaCa-2, receptor specific, and significantly inhibited MiaPaCa-2 tumor in nude mice (p<0.008).

Conclusions

In vitro studies show that the presence of both ligands on the same bispecific molecule is responsible for the superior activity of DTEGF13. Intratumoral administration showed that DTEGF13 was highly effective in checking aggressive tumor progression in mice. Lack of weight loss in these mice indicated that the drug was tolerated and a therapeutic index exists in an “on target” model in which DTEGF13 is cross-reactive with native mouse receptors.

Keywords: carcinoma, cytotoxin, diphtheria toxin, EGF, IL-13

Introduction

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most lethal cancers. Only 10–15% of patient’s tumors are resectable at diagnosis because of aggressive growth (1). More than 32,000 patients each year die of this cancer in the US alone mostly due to its highly aggressive and rapid metastasis (2). Pancreatic cancer is most commonly treated with the nucleoside analog Gemcitabine, but the median survival time is less than 6 months (3,4)[sbl1]. Studies have shown that pancreatic tumors overexpress EGFR (5) and others have shown that fusion toxins targeting the EGFR show promise for pancreatic cancer therapy (69). Also, IL-13R is expressed on pancreatic tumors. For example, investigators showed that 6 of 6 pancreatic cancer cell lines examined expressed IL-13R alpha 1 and IL-4R alpha, one cell line expressed IL-13R alpha 2, and 5 pancreatic cancer cell lines expressed gamma c (10). IL-13R-directed fusion toxins also have successfully been shown to kill pancreatic tumor cells (10,11).

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is the main ligand of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a transmembrane signaling protein from the erbB family (12). Studies have revealed a link between EGFR signaling pathways and malignancy (13). Interleukin-13 (IL-13) (14,15) secreted by activated Type-2 T cells and mast cells (16), is a pleiotropic lymphokine regulating inflammatory and immune responses. It modulates human monocyte and B cell functions but not those of T cells (17). Interleukin-13 receptors (IL-13R) are found to be overexpressed on solid tumor cells including glioblastoma (1821), renal cell carcinoma (22), AIDS Kaposi’s sarcoma (23), and cancers of prostate (24), ovary (25), and head and neck (26). IL-13 has proven a useful ligand for therapy because along with IL-13R being overexperessed on tumors, its expression on normal cells is limited to B cells and monocytes. It appears that IL-13R may function as a tumor-specific, high affinity target and incorporating IL-13 into a cytotoxin (CT) may be a beneficial strategy.

In this study, we created a novel single-chain recombinant bispecific cytotoxin (CT) by linking a fragment of diphtheria toxin (DT) to human EGF and IL-13 forming the fusion protein DTEGF13. Diphtheria toxin is used for cytotoxin construction because a single molecule delivered to the cytosol is sufficient to bring about cell killing (27). The truncated form of DT used in this study (DT390) was selected due to previous research describing a series of internal frame deletion mutations that established amino acid 389 as the best location for genetic fusion of DT to targeting ligands (28). DT390 contains the A fragment of native DT that catalyzes ADP ribosylation of elongation factor 2 (EF-2) leading to irreversible inhibition of protein synthesis and cell death (29,30).

This study set out to address the hypothesis that including two well-established targeting ligands on the same single chain molecule would have distinct targeting advantages over the same monospecific targeting agents. Thus, a new bispecific CT, DTEGF13, was bioengineered and compared to the monospecific cytotoxins DTEGF and DTIL13. Agents were tested against several aggressive human pancreatic tumor cell lines in vitro and against MiaPaCa-2 in vivo which are readily xenografted into athymic nude mice.

Materials and Methods

DTEGF13 Construction

DNA shuffling and PCR assembly techniques were used to assemble the genes encoding the single chain bispecific CT DTEGF13. From the 5’ end to 3’ end, the assembled gene consisted of an Nco1 restriction site, an ATG initiation codon, the first 389 amino acids of the DT molecule (DT390), the 7 amino acid EASGGPE linker, the genes for human EGF and IL-13 linked by a 20 amino acid segment of human muscle aldolase (hma), and a XhoI restriction site (Figure 1A). The primers used for the final assembly of DTEGF13 are shown in Table 1. The final 1755bp NcoI/XhoI target gene was spliced into the pET21d expression vector under control of an isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) inducible T7 promoter. The gene was correct in sequence and was been cloned (Biomedical Genomics Center, University of Minnesota). The monospecific agents, DTEGF and DTIL13 were created using the same techniques.

Figure 1. Construction and purification of DTEGF13.

Figure 1

A) The gene fragment encoding the single-chain bispecific immunotoxin DTEGF13 was created using overlap extension PCR. This construct consisted of: (from 5’ to 3’) a truncated diphtheria toxin molecule (DT390), a seven amino acid (EASPPGE) linker, human epidermal growth factor (EGF), a flexible 20 amino acid segment of human muscle aldolase (hma), and interleukin-13 (IL-13). Using the NcoI/XhoI restriction sites the sequence for DTEGF13 was cloned in the pET21d bacterial expression vector. B) SDS-PAGE analysis was used to analyze the expression and purification of DTEGF13. Lane 1-Inclusion bodies isolated from E. coli following IPTG-induction of DTEGF13 expression. Lane 2-Molecular weight standards. Lane 3-DTEGF13 (63.6 kDa) protein following in vitro refolding and purification.

Table 1.

Sequence of oligonucleotides used to assemble DTEGF13.

Primer Characteristics Sequence
A the sense primer introduced an NcoI restriction site 5’CAGccATGGGCGCTGAT
(underlined) with an initiation codon ATG and the first 7   GATGTTGTTGAT 3’
codons of DT
B the antisense primer introduced the codons 383 to 389 of DT 5’ ctcgggacctccggaagcttcAAATG
and codons of the linker EASGGPE   GTTGCGTTTTATGCCC 3’
C the sense primer introduced the codons of EASGGPE linker 5’ GAAGCTTCCGGAGGTCCC
and codons 1 to 7 of human EGF   GAGaacagcgacagcgaatgtccg 3’
D the antisense primer introduced last 7 codons of human EGF 5’ TTCgctAGCAGCAGCACC
and the codons of Part of the HMA linker with NheI restriction   AGCCTGACCAGACGGgcgc
site (underlined)   agttcccaccatttcag 3’
E the sense primer introduced part of the HMA linker with NheI 5’ GCTGCTagcGAATCTCTGT
restriction site (underlined) and codons 1 to 7 of  TCGTTTCTAACCACG3’
human IL13   CTTACggccctgtgcctccctctaca3’
F the antisense primer introduced the last 7 codons of human IL13 5’ cagCTCGAGCTAgttgaaccgt
and XhoI restriction site (underlined) with stop codon in front.   ccctcgcgaaa 3’

A pair of bivalent immunotoxins targeting hematological malignancies were produced and used as specificity controls in this study. DT2222, a bivalent fusion toxin control containing the same DT390 cassette, was produced by joining two repeating scFvs specific for human CD22 to DT390. CD22 is human B lymphocyte-specific glycoprotein that is expressed in the majority of B-cell leukemias and lymphomas (31). Bic3 is a T-cell specific immunotoxin consisting of two consecutive scFvs recognizing the human CD3ε?linked to DT390 (32).

Isolation of inclusion bodies, refolding and purification

These procedures were previously described (32). Plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) (Novagen, Madison WI). Following overnight culture, bacteria were grown in Luria broth. Gene expression was induced with the addition of IPTG (FischerBiotech, Fair Lawn, NJ). Two hours after induction, bacteria were harvested by centrifugation. Cell pellets were suspended and homogenized. Following sonication and centrifugation, the pellets were extracted and washed. Inclusion bodies were dissolved and protein refolded. Refolded proteins were purified by fast protein liquid chromatography ion exchange chromatography (Q sepharose Fast Flow, Sigma) using a continuous gradient.

Tissue Culture

The human pancreatic cell lines MiaPaCa-2 and PANC-1, and the Burkitt’s Lymphoma cell line Daudi (33) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville MD). The H2981-T3 human lung adenocarcinoma line has been described previously (34). Cells were maintained in DMEM (MiaPaCa-2 and PANC-1) or RPMI-1640 (H2981-T3 and Daudi) media (Cambrex, East Rutherford NJ) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. All carcinoma cells were grown as monolayers and Daudi cells in suspension using culture flasks. Cell cultures were incubated in a humidified 37°C atmosphere containing 5% CO2. When adherent cells were 80–90% confluent they were passaged using trypsin-EDTA for detachment. Only cells with viability >95%, as determined by trypan blue exclusion, were used for experiments.

Measuring cell kill by proliferation inhibition

To determine the effect of DTEGF13 on pancreatic cancer cells, proliferation assays measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation were performed (32). Cells (104/well) were plated out in a 96-well flat-bottomed plate and incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2 to allow cells to adhere. Cytotoxins in varying concentrations were added to wells in triplicate. Incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2 continued for 72 hours. [Methyl-3H]-thymidine (GE Healthcare, UK) was added (1 µCi per well) for the final 8 hours of incubation. Plates were frozen to detach cells and cells were then harvested onto a glass fiber filter, washed, dried, and counted using standard scintillation methods. Data from proliferation assays are reported as percentage of control counts. For blocking studies, increasing concentrations of EGF13 were mixed with 1 nM DTEGF13 and subsequent mixtures were added to wells containing MiaPaCa-2 cells. All other aspects of blocking assays were identical to the procedure listed above for proliferation assays.

In vivo efficacy studies

Male nu/nu mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Animal Production Area and housed in an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-accredited specific pathogen-free facility under the care of the Department of Research Animal Resources, University of Minnesota. Animal research protocols were approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All animals were housed in microisolator cages to minimize the potential of contaminating virus transmission. Three different flank tumor studies were performed for this study. In each of the experiments tumor volume was determined as a product of W × L × H[sbl2] as measured by calipers. Animal weights were also monitored as an indication of treatment-related toxicity. Mice with flank tumors >2.0 cm3 were euthanized in accordance with University of Minnesota Research Animal Resources guidelines.

Experiment 1

Flank tumors were initiated by injecting 1×107 MiaPaCa-2 cells in DMEM into the left flank of nude mice (n=20). On day 22, mice with tumors exceeding 50 mm3 in volume were randomized into DTEGF13 treatment or no treatment groups. groups. Treatment mice received 2.5 µg DTEGF13 in 100 µl PBS injected intratumorally. A total of 10 injections were given on days 22, 24, 27, 29, 31, 36, 38, 42, 45, and 48 (Figure 5B).

Figure 5. Effect of intratumoral injection of DTEGF13 on MiaPaCa-2 flank tumors-Experiment 1.

Figure 5

MiaPaCa-2 flank tumors were established by injecting 1×107 cells into the left flank of male nude mice. Once palpable tumors were established (day 22) mice were divided into two groups, A) No treatment or B) DTEGF13 treatment. Mice in the DTEGF13 group received 2.5 µg DTEGF13 injected intratumorally as often as indicated by arrows on graph.

Experiment 2

One day prior to cell injection, male nude mice were irradiated with 3 Gy using an X-ray irradiator. Flank tumors were established by injecting 1×107 MiaPaCa-2 cells in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM and Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose CA). When tumors reached approximately 50 mm3 (day 18), mice were divided into groups (n=5/group) and treatment was initiated. Four injections of 2.5 µg DTEGF13, DTEGF, or DTIL13 were given intratumorally QOD on days 18, 20, 22, and 24. Mice in the control group received intratumoral injections of 100 µl PBS.

Experiment 3

For the final flank tumor study, nude mice were injected with 1×107 MiaPaCa-2 cells in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM and Matrigel. On day 15 when flank tumors were approximately 75 mm3, mice were divided into treatment groups (n=6/group). Treatment mice received a total of 6 intratumoral injections of 2.5 µg of either DTEGF13 or the B-cell targeting immunotoxin DT2222. Injections were given on days 15, 17, 19, 23, 25, and 28.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analysis was performed using Prism 4 (Graphpad Software, Sand Diego CA). Groupwise comparisons of single data points were made by Student's t-test. Probability (p) values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Purification of DTEGF13

Following refolding and purification, batches of DTEGF13 were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1B) and size exclusion chromatography. Both analyses revealed that DTEGF13 was the expected molecular weight (63.6 kDa) and purity was ≥95%. Final yields of purified protein were 5–10 mg/L of culture.

The ability of DTEGF13 to inhibit proliferation of pancreatic tumor cells

To determine the ability of DTEGF13 to kill EGFR-expressing and IL-13R-expressing pancreatic cancer cells, it was tested against the EGFR+ and IL-13R+ PANC-1 tumor cell line (Figure 2). Bispecific DTEGF13 showed an IC50 (concentration that inhibits 50% of cell proliferation) of 0.035 nM indicating that it was at least 2,800-fold more toxic than either DTEGF or DTIL13 which did not reach an IC50. Bic3, a T-cell targeting IT containing the DT390 molecule was included as a specificity control. DTEGF13 also showed potent cytotoxicity against the SW-1990 and ASPC-1 pancreatic cancer cell lines with an IC50 of 0.00013 and 0.052 nM respectively (not shown). Killing in proliferation assays was verified by trypan blue staining (not shown).

Figure 2. Potent cytotoxicty of bispecific cytotoxin DTEGF13.

Figure 2

The in vitro activity of bispecific DTEGF13 and monospecific DTEGF and DTIL13 was determined by measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation into PANC-1 cells following 72 hour incubation with varying concentrations of CT. BIC3, a T-cell targeting immunotoxin containing DT390 was included as a negative control. Data is expressed as percentage of 3H-thymidine relative to control cells incubated in media alone (Control counts=30290±5091). Points represent mean of triplicate measures±SD. IC50 indicates the concentration of CT that inhibits 50% of cell proliferation relative to untreated cells.

Increased activity of DTEGF13 is due the presence of EGF and IL-13 ligands on a single molecule

Proliferation assays were conducted in order to determine if the increased activity of DTEGF13 was a result of the increased number of binding molecules present on a bispecific CT. Figure 3 shows the data comparing the activity DTEGF13 to the monospecific DTEGF and DTIL13, as well as a combination of both monospecific CT against MiaPaCa-2 pancreatic (Fig 3A) and H2981-T3 lung (Fig 3B) cancer cells. A mixture of DTEGF and DTIL13 results in an identical number of ligands as are present in the same concentration of DTEGF13. Against MiaPaCa-2 cells the monospecific DTEGF was able to kill with an IC50 of 0.007 nM. Monospecific DTIL13 was less effective with an IC50 of 30 nM. However, DTEGF13 showed an IC50 of 0.00017 nM, representing a 41-fold increase in activity as compared to DTEGF and a 176,000-fold increase in activity as compared to DTIL13. Interestingly, a mixture of DTEGF and DTIL13 showed no increased in activity over DTEGF alone. DTEGF13 also demonstrated broad reactivity with a number of EGFR+ and IL-13R+ carcinoma cell lines, including the human lung cancer cell line H2981-T3 (Figure 3B). As in the case of MiaPaCa-2, DTEGF13 was the most effective with an IC50 of 0.002 nM. DTEGF showed an IC50 of 0.25 nM and DTIL13 showed an IC50 of 100 nM, an increase of 125-fold and 50,000, respectively. Once again, a combination of DTEGF and DTIL13 showed no advantage in cytotoxicity over either monospecific CT. These data demonstrate the superior activity of DTEGF13 is due to the presence of both ligands on a single-chain molecule.

Figure 3. Enhanced cytotoxicity of bispecific DTEGF13 is dependant on linking both EGF and IL-13 on a single-chain molecule.

Figure 3

The anti-proliferative effect of DTEGF13, DTEGF, DTIL13, and a mixture of DTEGF/DTIL13 on A) MiaPaCa-2 (pancreatic) and B) H2981-T3 (lung) cancer cells was tested by measuring 3H-thymidine uptake 72 hours following CT exposure. Points on each graph represent mean of triplicate samples ± SD. Control counts= A) 72048±9826, B) 64876±11866.

Specificity of DTEGF13 cytotoxicity

In order to test the specificity of DTEGF13 activity, two different assays were conducted. Figure 4A shows that neither DTEGF13, nor the monospecific DTIL13 or DTEGF CT had any effect on the proliferation of EGFR and IL-13R Daudi lymphoma cells. In Figure 4B we demonstrate that the activity of 1 nM DTEGF13 can be blocked by adding saturating concentrations of EGF13 to cultures of MiaPaCa-2 cells. EGF13 is a recombinant molecule identical to DTEGF13 except that it lacks the DT390 fragment. A 10-fold excess of EGF13 was able to inhibit more than 80% of DTEGF13-mediated cell killing. Higher concentrations of EGF13 fully abrogated CT activity. The specificity of blocking was confirmed by the fact that even a 1000-fold excess of 2219EA, a B-cell targeting bispecific protein, was unable to affect the activity of DTEGF13. These data demonstrate the highly specific nature of DTEGF13 cytotoxicity.

Figure 4. Specificity of DTEGF13.

Figure 4

A) EGFR and IL-13R Daudi cells were incubated with DTEGF13, DTEGF, and DTIL13. B) DTEGF13 mediated cytotoxicity was inhibited by adding increasing concentrations of bispecific EGF13, which lacks a DT390 moiety, to cultures of MiaPaCa-2 cells incubated with 1 nM DTEGF13. 2219EA, a bispecific B-cell targeting molecule was used as an irrelevant negative control. In both experiments cell proliferation was determined by measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation following 72 hours incubation time. Data is expressed as percentage of cell-associated 3H-thymidine at each concentration relative to control cells. Points represent means±SD.

Efficacy of intratumoral DTEGF13 in a MiaPaCa-2 nude mouse flank tumor model

To test the ability of DTEGF13 to inhibit pancreatic tumor growth in vivo, human MiaPaCa-2 cells were xenografted into the flank of nude mice. Once the tumors were established and palpable, mice were treated with multiple intratumoral injections. For Experiment 1 shown in Figure 5, 1×107 tumor cells suspended in DMEM were injected into mice that had not been subjected to total body irradiation (TBI). This method yielded a poor tumor establishment rate (<40% of injected animals). Three of the animals that did form tumors were given an aggressive course of 10 injections of DTEGF13 over the course of three weeks, as established from earlier pilot experiments. In this experiment, control tumor growth was slower than desired in most animals (Figure 5A). However, Figure 5B shows that the course of DTEGF13 treatment appeared to keep tumor growth in check over the duration of the short study.

In Experiment 2 (Figure 6), animals were given 3 Gy TBI one day prior to the injection of 1×107 MiaPaCa-2 cells. Cells were injected in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM and Matrigel in order to promote better tumor growth. The combination of TBI and Matrigel increased the tumor take rate to >95%. When treatment was initiated (day 18), mice in the treatment groups received 4 intratumoral injections of 2.5 µg of either DTEGF13, DTEGF, or DTIL13 given every other day. Control mice received intratumoral injections of PBS on the same schedule. Figure 6A shows that the highest degree of anti-tumor efficacy was achieved with DTEGF13 administration. Figure 6B shows the tumor volumes of the individual animals in the DTEGF13 treatment group. Each of the animals showed a noticeable decrease in tumor volume with one tumor completely regressing. However, Figure 6C shows that treatment-related toxicity was heightened by the total body irradiation given to the animals in this experiment. Weight loss and mortality (3/5 animals) occurred despite following a previously well-tolerated treatment regimen. Others have reported that immunotoxin toxicity can exacerbated by irradiation (33).

Figure 6. Effect of intratumoral injection of DTEGF13 on MiaPaCa-2 flank tumors-Experiment 2.

Figure 6

Prior to injection of tumor cells, male nude mice were irradiated with 3 Gy using an x-ray irradiator. Flank tumors were then established by injecting 1×107 MiaPaCa-2 cells in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM:Matrigel. When tumors reached approximately 50 mm3, mice were divided into groups and treated with intratumoral injections of 2.5 µg DTEGF13, DTIL13, DTEGF, or PBS. Four injections were given QOD as indicated by arrows on graph. A) Average tumor volume of animals in each treatment group. B) Individual tumor volumes and C) Animal weights of individual mice in the DTEGF13 treatment group.

For Experiment 3 (Figure 7), unirradiated mice were injected subcutaneously in the left flank with 1×107 MiaPaCa-2 cells suspended in 100 µl of a 1:1 mixture of DMEM and Matrigel. This method facilitated 100% tumor establishment without introducing the unwanted side effects related to TBI. Figure 7A shows significant anti-tumor effect of DTEGF13 compared to the tumor progression observed in groups of mice that were untreated or were treated with the negative control DT2222. Tumor growth was contained, but relapses did occur following cessation of DTEGF13 treatment. A course of 6 intratumoral injections of 2.5 µg DTEGF13 was tolerated with no significant toxicity as evidenced by animal weight (Figure 7B).

Figure 7. Effect of intratumoral administration of DTEGF13 on MiaPaCa-2 flank tumors-Experiment 3.

Figure 7

A) A final xenograft model of pancreatic cancer was established by injecting male nude mice (no prior irradiation) with 1×107 MiaPaCa-2 cells in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM:Matrigel. Mice were randomized into three groups (n=6/group) on day 15 when the average tumor volume was approximately 75 mm3. Treated animals were injected intratumorally with 2.5 µg of either DTEGF13 or the B-cell lymphoma targeting DT2222. A total of 6 injections were given over the course of two weeks as indicated by arrows on graph. B) Weights of animals in the DTEGF13 treatment group.

Together, these studies show that in a model in which the human EGF and IL-13 of DTEGF13 is cross-reactive with mouse EGFR and IL-13R, DTEGF13 is a highly effective anti-tumor agent. The agent is highly selective in its action against pancreatic cancer and both EGF and IL-13 moieties positioned on the same molecule are necessary for its superior anti-tumor effect.

Discussion

The original contribution of this study is that IL-13 and EGF were cloned into the same single chain molecule with truncated diphtheria toxin. The new recombinant hybrid anti-pancreatic cancer agent had far greater activity than CT made with either cytokine alone. This new DTEGF13 was potent and highly effective against MiaPaCa-2 tumor cells in vitro displaying an IC50 of 0.00017 nM, representing a 41-fold increase in activity over DTEGF and a 176,000-fold increase in activity over DTIL-13. Studies with mixtures of monomeric CT showed that the enhanced activity of DTEGF13 was dependent on having both ligands on the same single chain molecule. Additionally, DTEGF13 had striking effects against pancreatic tumors in vivo. Despite the aggressive nature of the Mia-PaCa-2 flank tumor in xenografted nude mice, all of the tumors responded including one tumor that did not reoccur after treatment. Another important aspect of this study is that EGF and IL-13 are cross-reactive with mouse EGFR and IL-13R in this mouse model (constituting an “on target” model). Multiple injections of DTEGF13 were tolerated. Thus, a therapeutic index clearly exists.

Others have investigated the potential of using IL-13R and EGFR-targeted toxins for therapy of this aggressive pancreatic cancer. For example, investigators have enhanced IL-13Ralpha2 gene expression in pancreatic cancer cells and showed that these IL-13R expressed tumors had susceptibility to IL13 CT (11). Interestingly, these investigators reported a dominant infiltration of cells including macrophages and natural killer cells in the regressing tumors. Since macrophages were found to produce nitric oxide, IL-13Ralpha2-targeted cancer therapy involved not only a direct tumor cell killing by IL-13 cytotoxin but also activation of innate immune response at the tumor site. It will be important to determine whether DTEGF13 is activating the immune response. This study also points out that IL-13 CT are not effective against all pancreatic tumors, probably because they differ in the amount of surface IL-13R expressed. Since DTEGF13 appears to require limited IL-13R expression to enhance tumor kill, it is a very attractive anti-pancreatic cancer agent.

For EGF, studies show a recombinant immunotoxin made by genetically fusing the anti-EGFR single chain variable fragment to truncated pseudomonas aeroginosa exotoxin A showed specific binding to and toxicity against the EGFR-positive, metastatic pancreatic carcinoma cell line L3.6pl, but not to control cell systems (6,7). Both single and multiple injection treatment protocols resulted in a significant reduction in the average number of lung metastases in tumor bearing animals indicating that targeting the EGFR with CT is an effective strategy against disseminated human pancreatic carcinoma cells. Together, these studies suggest that targeting EGFR and IL13R simultaneously may have clear advantages.

In the in vivo experiments performed in this paper, experiment 1 showed that DTEGF13 was effective, but control tumor growth was slow. In experiment 2, DTEGF13 was effective again, but toxicity was enhanced because total body irradiation was given to enhance tumor growth. Others have shown in human lymphoma models that irradiation can enhance immunotoxin related side effects (36, 37). This appears to be also true of DTEGF13. Others are exploring the efficacy of targeting EGFR with radiolabeled antibodies (38, 39). Combining this form of therapy with our DTEGF13 CT therapy would be unadvisable without thorough investigation. However, other forms of combined therapy may be very effective. For example, phase 1 studies are currently examining combining anti-EGFR antibody therapy with gemcitabine chemotherapy (40). Gemcitabine is the most successful form of chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Because CT have a mechanism of killing that is entirely different from the mechanism of kill of chemotherapy, many studies have shown that chemotherapy can be successfully combined with immunotoxin or cytotoxin therapy (4143). Thus, the probability is high the effectiveness of DTEGF13 therapy can be heightened by combining it with chemotherapy. In fact, investigators have combined IL-4 CT with gemcitabine heightening anti-pancreatic cancer efficacy (44). In fact, our preliminary studies with MiaPaca-2 show that adding 50 nM gemcitabine reduces the IC50 of DTEGF13 over 3 logs in vitro. In experiment 3, we successfully enhanced tumor growth by injecting cells in Matrigel and DTEGF13 was highly effective at inhibiting flank tumor growth.

The combined effect of the monomeric DTEGF and DTIL13 CT was not greater than the individual effects of the monomeric CT, but when IL-13R and EGFR were targeted simultaneously by linking both cytokines on the same molecule, the anti-cancer effect was enhanced. The reason could potentially relate to enhanced receptor numbers, enhanced internalization, or differences in intracellular, subcellular compartmentalization. Studies with prostate cancer cells show that enhanced activity of DTEGF13 may not be solely attributed to binding (45). Past studies show that immunotoxin activity relates to compartmentalization within the cell. Studies of the interrelationships of the IL-13R and EGFR pathways in a primary normal human bronchial epithelial cell culture system via microarray analysis indicate that the two pathways have independent effects (39). The enhanced activity of DTEGF13 could relate to improved internalization whereby the toxin is delivered more efficiently to the cytosol, the main target organelle of catalytic toxins. The ligands themselves are not contributing to the cytotoxicity, since we synthesized EGF13 devoid of toxin and this molecule did not inhibit proliferation of cells that were killed by DTEGF13.

As discussed, toxicity issues will need to be addressed more thoroughly. Mice tolerated DTEGF13 very well at the dose of 2.5 ug/injection (100 ug/kg). However, tolerability was dependent on spacing the doses. Intratumoral injection is not an effective means of delivery since areas of the tumor are often not injected and relapses occur in these neglected tumor areas. Moreover, injection precipitously spikes the dosage creating steep peaks and rapid troughs. Studies by others indicate that pump delivery may be superior providing constant dose delivery over a far longer period of time.

Other bispecific fusion toxins have been reported. In some reports, inclusion of a second ligand enhances activity (35, 46), but not in others (47). Currently, no method exists which predicts whether a given bispecific will be successful.

In conclusion, DTEGF13 represents a powerful new anti-pancreatic cancer agent. Its construction is based on molecules that react with well-studied and established cancer targets, IL13R and EGFR. In vitro studies show conclusive proof that the presence of both ligands on the same molecule is responsible for its superior activity. Animal studies in a model in which human DTEGF13 is cross-reactive with the native mouse receptors indicate that it is highly effective in checking aggressive tumor progression and reasonably tolerated. DTEGF13 may be a useful alternative therapy for pancreatic cancer and perhaps other carcinomas.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the US Public Health Service Grants RO1-CA36725, RO1-CA082154, and P20 CA101955 awarded by the NCI and the NIAID, DHHS.

Abbreviations

CT

cytotoxin

DT

diphtheria toxin

EGF

Epidermal growth factor

EGFR

Epidermal growth factor receptor

IC50

Inhibition concentration 50%

IL-13

Interleukin 13

IL13R

Interleukin 13 receptor

IL4R

Interleukin 4 receptor

Footnotes

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to disclose in the submission and publication of this work.

“The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, an exclusive licence (or non exclusive for government employees) on a worldwide basis to the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and its licencees, to permit this article (if accepted) to be published in Gut and any other BMJ Group products and to exploit all subsidiary rights, as set out in our licence (http://gut.bmjjournals.com//ifora/licence.pdf)”

References

  • 1.Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00075-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56(2):106–130. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.2.106. [sbl3] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V, Hainsworth J, Hochster H, Lenzi R, et al. Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(18):3402–3408. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tzeng CW, Frolov A, Frolova N, Jhala NC, Howard JH, Buchsbaum DJ, Vickers SM, Heslin MJ, Arnoletti JP. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is highly conserved in pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2007;141(4):464–469. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bruell D, Bruns CJ, Yezhelyev M, Huhn M, Muller J, Ischenko I, et al. Recombinant anti-EGFR immunotoxin 425(scFv)-ETA' demonstrates anti-tumor activity against disseminated human pancreatic cancer in nude mice. Int J Mol Med. 2005;15(2):305–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bruell D, Stocker M, Huhn M, Redding N, Kupper M, Schumacher P, et al. The recombinant anti-EGF receptor immunotoxin 425(scFv)-ETA' suppresses growth of a highly metastatic pancreatic carcinoma cell line. Int J Oncol. 2003;23(4):1179–1186. doi: 10.3892/ijo.23.4.1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Psarras K, Ueda M, Yamamura T, Ozawa S, Kitajima M, Aiso S, et al. Human pancreatic RNase1-human epidermal growth factor fusion: an entirely human 'immunotoxin analog' with cytotoxic properties against squamous cell carcinomas. Protein Eng. 1998;11(12):1285–1292. doi: 10.1093/protein/11.12.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jinno H, Ueda M, Ozawa S, Kikuchi K, Ikeda T, Enomoto K, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent cytotoxic effect by an EGF-ribonuclease conjugate on human cancer cell lines--a trial for less immunogenic chimeric toxin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1996;38(4):303–308. doi: 10.1007/s002800050487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kornmann M, Kleeff J, Debinski W, Korc M. Pancreatic cancer cells express interleukin-13 and -4 receptors, and their growth is inhibited by Pseudomonas exotoxin coupled to interleukin-13 and -4. Anticancer Res. 1999;19(1A):125–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kawakami K, Kawakami M, Husain SR, Puri RK. Potent antitumor activity of IL-13 cytotoxin in human pancreatic tumors engineered to express IL-13 receptor alpha2 chain in vivo. Gene Ther. 2003;10(13):1116–1128. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lin CR, Chen WS, Kruiger W, Stolarsky LS, Weber W, Evans RM, et al. Expression cloning of human EGF receptor complementary DNA: gene amplification and three related messenger RNA products in A431 cells. Science. 1984;224(4651):843–848. doi: 10.1126/science.6326261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lo HW, Hung MC. Nuclear EGFR signalling network in cancers: linking EGFR pathway to cell cycle progression, nitric oxide pathway and patient survival. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(2):184–188. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602941. Review. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Minty A, Chalon P, Derocq JM, Dumont X, Guillemot JC, Kaghad M, et al. Interleukin-13 is a new human lymphokine regulating inflammatory and immune responses. Nature. 1993;362(6417):248–250. doi: 10.1038/362248a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McKenzie AN, Culpepper JA, de Waal Malefyt R, Briere F, Punnonen J, et al. Interleukin 13, a T-cell-derived cytokine that regulates human monocyte and B-cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(8):3735–3739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brown KD, Zurawski SM, Mosmann TR, Zurawski G. A family of small inducible proteins secreted by leukocytes are members of a new superfamily that includes leukocyte and fibroblast-derived inflammatory agents, growth factors, and indicators of various activation processes. J Immunol. 1989;142(2):679–687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zurawski G, de Vries JE. Interleukin 13, an interleukin 4-like cytokine that acts on monocytes and B cells, but not on T cells. Immunol Today. 1994;15(1):19–26. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(94)90021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Debinski W, Obiri NI, Powers SK, Pastan I, Puri RK. Human glioma cells overexpress receptors for interleukin 13 and are extremely sensitive to a novel chimeric protein composed of interleukin 13 and pseudomonas exotoxin. Clin Cancer Res. 1995;1(11):1253–1258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Debinski W, Gibo DM, Hulet SW, Connor JR, Gillespie GY. Receptor for interleukin 13 is a marker and therapeutic target for human high-grade gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5(5):985–990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Debinski W, Slagle B, Gibo DM, Powers SK, Gillespie GY. Expression of a restrictive receptor for interleukin 13 is associated with glial transformation. J Neurooncol. 2000;48(2):103–111. doi: 10.1023/a:1006446426611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Husain SR, Joshi BH, Puri RK. Interleukin-13 receptor as a unique target for anti-glioblastoma therapy. Int J Cancer. 2001;92(2):168–175. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(200102)9999:9999<::aid-ijc1182>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Obiri NI, Debinski W, Leonard WJ, Puri RK. Receptor for interleukin 13. Interaction with interleukin 4 by a mechanism that does not involve the common gamma chain shared by receptors for interleukins 2, 4, 7, 9, and 15. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(15):8797–8804. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.15.8797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Husain SR, Obiri NI, Gill P, Zheng T, Pastan I, Debinski W, et al. Receptor for interleukin 13 on AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma cells serves as a new target for a potent Pseudomonas exotoxin-based chimeric toxin protein. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3(2):151–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Maini A, Hillman G, Haas GP, Wang CY, Montecillo E, Hamzavi F, et al. Interleukin-13 receptors on human prostate carcinoma cell lines represent a novel target for a chimeric protein composed of IL-13 and a mutated form of Pseudomonas exotoxin. J Urol. 1997;158(3 Pt 1):948–953. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199709000-00077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murata T, Obiri NI, Puri RK. Human ovarian-carcinoma cell lines express IL-4 and IL-13 receptors: comparison between IL-4- and IL-13-induced signal transduction. Int J Cancer. 1997;70(2):230–240. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970117)70:2<230::aid-ijc15>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Joshi BH, Kawakami K, Leland P, Puri RK. Heterogeneity in interleukin-13 receptor expression and subunit structure in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: differential sensitivity to chimeric fusion proteins comprised of interleukin-13 and a mutated form of Pseudomonas exotoxin. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(6):1948–1956. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yamaizumi M, Mekada E, Uchida T, Okada Y. One molecule of diphtheria toxin fragment A introduced into a cell can kill the cell. Cell. 1978;15(1):245–250. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Williams DP, Snider CE, Strom TB, Murphy JR. Structure/function analysis of interleukin-2-toxin (DAB486-IL-2) Fragment B sequences required for the delivery of fragment A to the cytosol of target cells. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:11885–11889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Collier RJ. Diphtheria toxin: mode of action and structure. Bacteriol Rev. 1975;39(1):54–85. doi: 10.1128/br.39.1.54-85.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oppenheimer NJ, Bodley JW. Diphtheria toxin. Site and configuration of ADP-ribosylation of diphthamide in elongation factor 2. J Biol Chem. 1981;256(16):8579–8581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pezzutto A, Rabinovitch PS, Dorken B, Moldenhauer G, Clark EA. Role of CD22 human B cell antigen in B cell triggering by anti-immunoglobulin. J. Immunol. 1988;140:1791–1795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vallera DA, Todhunter D, Kuroki DW, Shu Y, Sicheneder A, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, et al. Molecular modification of a recombinant, bivalent anti-human CD3 immunotoxin (Bic3) results in reduced in vivo toxicity in mice. Leuk Res. 2005;29:331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2004.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Klein E, Klein G, Nadkarni JS, Nadkarni JJ, Wigzell H, Clifford P. Surface IgM-kappa specificity on a Burkitt lymphoma cell in vivo and in derived culture lines. Cancer Res. 1968;28:1300–1310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schmidberger H, King L, Lasky LC, Vallera DA. Antitumor activity of L6-Ricin immunotoxin against the H2981-T3 lung adenocarcinoma line in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 1990;50:3249–3256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vallera DA, Todhunter DA, Kuroki DW, Shu Y, Sicheneder A, Chen H. A bispecific recombinant immunotoxin, DT2219, targeting human CD19 and CD22 receptors in a mouse xenograft model of B-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 11:3879–3888. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2290. 200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wei BR, Ghetie MA, Vitetta ES. The combined use of an immunotoxin and a radioimmunoconjugate to treat disseminated human B-cell lymphoma in immunodeficient mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6(2):631–642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schindler J, Sausville E, Messmann R, Uhr JW, Vitetta ES. The toxicity of deglycosylated ricin A chain-containing immunotoxins in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is exacerbated by prior radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis of patients in five clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(2):255–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wygoda Z, Kula D, Bierzynska-Macyszyn G, Larysz D, Jarzab M, Wlaszczuk P, et al. Use of monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody in the radioimmunotherapy of malignant gliomas in the context of EGFR expression in grade III and IV tumors. Hybridoma (Larchmt) 2006;25(3):125–132. doi: 10.1089/hyb.2006.25.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pnwar P, Iznaga-Escobar N, Mishra P, Srivastava V, Sharma RK, Chandra R, et al. Radiolabeling and biological evaluation of DOTA-Ph-Al derivative conjugated to anti-EGFR antibody ior egf/r3 for targeted tumor imaging and therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4(8):854–860. doi: 10.4161/cbt.4.8.1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Graeven U, Kremer B, Sudhoff T, Killing B, Rojo F, Weber D, et al. Phase I study of the humanised anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody matuzumab (EMD 72000) combined with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(9):1293–1299. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Weil-Hillman G, Uckun FM, Manske JM, Vallera DA. Combined immunochemotherapy of human solid tumors in nude mice. Cancer Res. 1987;47(2):579–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Uckun FM, Chelstrom LM, Finnegan D, Tuel-Ahlgren L, Manivel C, Irvin JD, et al. Effective immunochemotherapy of CALLA+C mu+ human pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency using B43 (anti-CD19) pokeweed antiviral protein immunotoxin plus cyclophosphamide. Blood. 1992;79(12):3116–3129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ghetie MA, Tucker K, Richardson J, Uhr JW, Vitetta ES. Eradication of minimal disease in severe combined immunodeficient mice with disseminated Daudi lymphoma using chemotherapy and an immunotoxin cocktail. Blood. 1994;84(3):702–707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shimamura T, Royal RE, Kioi M, Nakajima A, Husain SR, Puri RK. Interleukin-4 cytotoxin therapy synergizes with gemcitabine in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2007;67(20):9903–9912. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stish BJ, Chen H, Shu Y, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Vallera DA. A bispecific recombinant cytotoxin (DTEGF13) targeting human interleukin-13 and epidermal growth factor receptors in a mouse xenograft model of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(21):6486–6493. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stish BJ, Chen H, Shu Y, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Vallera DA. Increasing anti-carcinoma activity of an anti-erbB2 recombinant immunotoxin by the addition of an anti-EpCAM sFv. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3058–3067. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rustamzadeh E, Vallera DA, Todhunter DA, Low WC, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Hall WA. Immunotoxin pharmacokinetics: a comparison of the anti-glioblastoma bi-specific fusion protein (DTAT13) to DTAT and DTIL13. J Neurooncol. 2006;77(3):257–266. doi: 10.1007/s11060-005-9051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES