Abstract
The syncytial divisions of the Drosophila melanogaster embryo lack some of the well established cell-cycle checkpoints. It has been suggested that without these checkpoints the divisions would display a reduced fidelity. To test this idea, we examined division error frequencies in individuals bearing an abnormally long and rearranged second chromosome, designated C(2)EN. Relative to a normal chromosome, this chromosome imposes additional structural demands on the mitotic apparatus in both the early syncytial embryonic divisions and the later somatic divisions. We demonstrate that the C(2)EN chromosome does not increase the error frequency of the late larva neuroblast divisions. However, in the syncytial embryonic nuclear divisions, the C(2)EN chromosome produces a 10-fold increase in division errors relative to embryos with a normal karyotype. During late anaphase of the neuroblast divisions, the sister C(2)EN chromosomes cleanly separate from one another. In contrast, during late anaphase of the syncytial divisions in C(2)EN-bearing nuclei, large amounts of chromatin often lag on the metaphase plate. Live analysis of C(2)EN-bearing embryos demonstrates that individual nuclei in the syncytial population of dividing nuclei often delay in their initiation of anaphase. These delays frequently lead to division errors. Eventually the products of the nuclei delayed in anaphase sink inward and are removed from the dividing population of syncytial nuclei. These results suggest that the Drosophila embryo may be equipped with mechanisms that monitor the fidelity of the syncytial nuclear divisions. Unlike checkpoints that rely on cell cycle delays to identify and correct division errors, these embryonic mechanisms rely on cell cycle delays to identify and discard the products of division errors.
Full text
PDF











Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson K. V., Lengyel J. A. Changing rates of DNA and RNA synthesis in Drosophila embryos. Dev Biol. 1981 Feb;82(1):127–138. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90434-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar B. A., Schubiger G. Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development. Cell. 1986 Mar 28;44(6):871–877. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90009-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foe V. E., Alberts B. M. Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. J Cell Sci. 1983 May;61:31–70. doi: 10.1242/jcs.61.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman M., Glover D. M. The gnu mutation of Drosophila causes inappropriate DNA synthesis in unfertilized and fertilized eggs. Genes Dev. 1987 Nov;1(9):924–930. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.9.924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman M., Nüsslein-Volhard C., Glover D. M. The dissociation of nuclear and centrosomal division in gnu, a mutation causing giant nuclei in Drosophila. Cell. 1986 Aug 1;46(3):457–468. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90666-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gatti M., Baker B. S. Genes controlling essential cell-cycle functions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1989 Apr;3(4):438–453. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.4.438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gatti M., Goldberg M. L. Mutations affecting cell division in Drosophila. Methods Cell Biol. 1991;35:543–586. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60587-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gatti M., Tanzarella C., Olivieri G. Analysis of the chromosome aberrations induced by x-rays in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Aug;77(4):701–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.4.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gaul U., Seifert E., Schuh R., Jäckle H. Analysis of Krüppel protein distribution during early Drosophila development reveals posttranscriptional regulation. Cell. 1987 Aug 14;50(4):639–647. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartwell L. H. Cell division from a genetic perspective. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jun;77(3):627–637. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.3.627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartwell L. H., Weinert T. A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. doi: 10.1126/science.2683079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoyt M. A., Totis L., Roberts B. T. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):507–517. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karr T. L., Alberts B. M. Organization of the cytoskeleton in early Drosophila embryos. J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1494–1509. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellogg D. R., Mitchison T. J., Alberts B. M. Behaviour of microtubules and actin filaments in living Drosophila embryos. Development. 1988 Aug;103(4):675–686. doi: 10.1242/dev.103.4.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehner C. F., O'Farrell P. H. Expression and function of Drosophila cyclin A during embryonic cell cycle progression. Cell. 1989 Mar 24;56(6):957–968. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90629-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehner C. F., O'Farrell P. H. The roles of Drosophila cyclins A and B in mitotic control. Cell. 1990 May 4;61(3):535–547. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90535-m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li R., Murray A. W. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):519–531. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKnight S. L., Miller O. L., Jr Ultrastructural patterns of RNA synthesis during early embryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1976 Jun;8(2):305–319. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merrill P. T., Sweeton D., Wieschaus E. Requirements for autosomal gene activity during precellular stages of Drosophila melanogaster. Development. 1988 Nov;104(3):495–509. doi: 10.1242/dev.104.3.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minden J. S., Agard D. A., Sedat J. W., Alberts B. M. Direct cell lineage analysis in Drosophila melanogaster by time-lapse, three-dimensional optical microscopy of living embryos. J Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;109(2):505–516. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.2.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchison T. J., Sedat J. Localization of antigenic determinants in whole Drosophila embryos. Dev Biol. 1983 Sep;99(1):261–264. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90275-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray A. W. Creative blocks: cell-cycle checkpoints and feedback controls. Nature. 1992 Oct 15;359(6396):599–604. doi: 10.1038/359599a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray A. W., Solomon M. J., Kirschner M. W. The role of cyclin synthesis and degradation in the control of maturation promoting factor activity. Nature. 1989 May 25;339(6222):280–286. doi: 10.1038/339280a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novitski E., Grace D., Strommen C. The entire compound autosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1981 Jun;98(2):257–273. doi: 10.1093/genetics/98.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pines J. Cell proliferation and control. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;4(2):144–148. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(92)90024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raff J. W., Glover D. M. Nuclear and cytoplasmic mitotic cycles continue in Drosophila embryos in which DNA synthesis is inhibited with aphidicolin. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 1):2009–2019. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rao P. N., Johnson R. T. Mammalian cell fusion: studies on the regulation of DNA synthesis and mitosis. Nature. 1970 Jan 10;225(5228):159–164. doi: 10.1038/225159a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ripoll P., Pimpinelli S., Valdivia M. M., Avila J. A cell division mutant of Drosophila with a functionally abnormal spindle. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):907–912. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80071-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan W., Minden J. S., Alberts B. M. daughterless-abo-like, a Drosophila maternal-effect mutation that exhibits abnormal centrosome separation during the late blastoderm divisions. Development. 1990 Oct;110(2):311–323. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.2.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Theurkauf W. E. Behavior of structurally divergent alpha-tubulin isotypes during Drosophila embryogenesis: evidence for post-translational regulation of isotype abundance. Dev Biol. 1992 Nov;154(1):205–217. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90060-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tobey R. A. Different drugs arrest cells at a number of distinct stages in G2. Nature. 1975 Mar 20;254(5497):245–247. doi: 10.1038/254245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner F. R., Mahowald A. P. Scanning electron microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis. 1. The structure of the egg envelopes and the formation of the cellular blastoderm. Dev Biol. 1976 May;50(1):95–108. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90070-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wieschaus E., Sweeton D. Requirements for X-linked zygotic gene activity during cellularization of early Drosophila embryos. Development. 1988 Nov;104(3):483–493. doi: 10.1242/dev.104.3.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zalokar M. Autoradiographic study of protein and RNA formation during early development of Drosophila eggs. Dev Biol. 1976 Apr;49(2):425–437. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90185-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







