Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2009 Jun 1;23(9):1047–1057. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832a1806

Table 2. In vivo frequencies of mutations selected in vitro.

HIV Subtype

Residue Region A B C D

316Ta V3 0.25 (13/53)c 0.05 (27/528) 0.68 (318/469) 0.11 (7/61)
316Ab V3 0.68 (36/53) 0.84 (443/528) 0.25 (119/469) 0.77 (47/61)

302Ka V3 0 (0/53) 0.02 (9/528) 0.004 (2/469) 0.08 (5/61)
302Nb V3 0.98 (52/53) 0.98 (521/528) 0.98 (461/469) 0.80 (49/61)

146Ia,d V1 0.02 (1/53) 0.05 (28/528) 0.01 (4/469) 0.07 (4/61)
146T/Sb,d V1 0.30 (16/53) 0.18 (94/528) 0.14 (66/469) 0.28 (17/61)

V1-Δ5a V1-V2 -e - + -
V1-no del V1-V2 +e + - +

Mutant (a) and wild type (b) residues. (c) Frequency of mutant and wild type amino acid residues in HIV subtype-A (A1), -B, -C and −D sequences from the Los Alamos database; number of sequences over number examined in brackets. (d) As V1 is very difficult to align, numbers are approximations. (e) V1-V2 length comparison: regions with long loops were common (+) in subtypes −A, B, D, and rare (-) in subtype-C. In contrast, regions with shorter loops were common (+) in subtype-C and rare (-) in the other subtypes (the consensus subtype-C V1-V2 loop was 13 amino acid shorter than that of any other subtype)(www.hiv.lanl.gov).