Abstract
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has emerged as a new and important member in the group of gaseous signaling molecules. However, the molecular transport mechanism has not yet been identified. Because of structural similarities with H2O, it was hypothesized that aquaporins may facilitate H2S transport across cell membranes. We tested this hypothesis by reconstituting the archeal aquaporin AfAQP from sulfide reducing bacteria Archaeoglobus fulgidus into planar membranes and by monitoring the resulting facilitation of osmotic water flow and H2S flux. To measure H2O and H2S fluxes, respectively, sodium ion dilution and buffer acidification by proton release (H2S ⇆ H+ + HS−) were recorded in the immediate membrane vicinity. Both sodium ion concentration and pH were measured by scanning ion-selective microelectrodes. A lower limit of lipid bilayer permeability to H2S, PM,H2S ≥ 0.5 ± 0.4 cm/s was calculated by numerically solving the complete system of differential reaction diffusion equations and fitting the theoretical pH distribution to experimental pH profiles. Even though reconstitution of AfAQP significantly increased water permeability through planar lipid bilayers, PM,H2S remained unchanged. These results indicate that lipid membranes may well act as a barrier to water transport although they do not oppose a significant resistance to H2S diffusion. The fact that cholesterol and sphingomyelin reconstitution did not turn these membranes into an H2S barrier indicates that H2S transport through epithelial barriers, endothelial barriers, and membrane rafts also occurs by simple diffusion and does not require facilitation by membrane channels.
Keywords: aquaporins, gas transport, membrane permeability, unstirred layer, signaling
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has emerged as a new gaseous signaling molecule despite its reputation as a toxic gas with a repulsive odor (1). H2S is engaged in regulation and modulation of physiological functions such as vasorelaxation, vasodilatation, blood pressure modulation, and inhibition of apoptosis in a number of cell types (2–5). It is an important mediator of endotoxic shock (6) and acute inflammation, acting at the leukocyte–endothelium interface (7). Physiological concentrations of H2S selectively enhance NMDA receptor-mediated responses and may modulate synaptic activities regulated by steroid hormones and neurotransmitters, suggesting that endogenous H2S functions as a neuromodulator in the brain (8). In the brain and the vasculature, micromolar quantities of H2S are produced by enzymes of the cysteine biosynthetic pathway (9, 10). H2S is believed to act as a gaseous messenger like nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO). Unlike NO and CO, H2S is not known to form toxic metabolites (11). Although the importance of H2S in brain, vascular, and cardiac functions are known and new targets of its action are emerging, the transport physiology of H2S is not well characterized.
According to some reports, H2S is believed to be a highly lipophilic molecule and to freely penetrate cells of all types (12). According to another report, H2S is highly soluble in water. Bubbling of H2S into water yields a saturated solution of 100 mM H2S (13). To the best of our knowledge, however, neither the partition coefficient into the organic phase nor its actual membrane permeability, PM, is known. Unfortunately, in silico predictions of the octanol water partition coefficient are not very reliable for small molecules (compare Table 1). Moreover, the structural similarity between H2S and H2O suggests that caution is required when applying the solubility model to predict PM (14), meaning that even when the partition coefficient is known, the actual and predicted PM may not match each other. The similarity between H2S and H2O also suggests that H2S transport may be facilitated by water channels (15). Aquaporin-M (AqpM) an archeal water channel from Methanothermobacter marburgensis was speculated to provide a H2S permeation pathway. Its crystal structure revealed a pore geometry that would easily accommodate H2S (15). An evolutionarily close relative of AqpM, the archeal aquaporin from a sulfide-reducing bacteria Archaeoglobus fulgidus (AfAQP), shares 71% sequence identity with AqpM (compare SI Text for AfAQP sequence). In addition, the pore-forming amino acids in both of these aquaporins are identical except for replacement of cystein-79 of AqpM with alanine in AfAQP (16). The likelihood of AfAQP being an H2S pathway is high because aquaporin-mediated facilitation of water movement through the lipid matrix seems to be a superfluous luxury in hot springs. In contrast, temperature-mediated elevation of metabolic rates results in intracellular accumulation of H2S, which should be toxic to the bacteria if not immediately exported. With this point in mind, we took AfAQP as the most likely H2S channel prototype and evaluated the potential contribution of this aquaporin to H2S membrane transport. In light of the emerging importance of H2S as a third gaseous messenger molecule, the results should have implications for studying signal cascades in the cardiovascular system and the brain, where human aquaporins like aquaporin-1 and aquaporin-4 may act as H2S transporters.
Table 1.
Volatile molecule | Predicted partition coefficient | Measured partition coefficient |
---|---|---|
Oxygen (O2) | KpO2† = 0.08 | KpO2‡ = 2 (35, 36) |
Ammonia (NH3) | KpNH3† = 0.2 | KpNH3 = 0.002 (29) |
Carbon dioxide (CO2) | KpCO2† = 7.9 | KpCO2 = 1.5 (43) |
Hydrogen sulfide | KpH2S† = 3.2 | Unknown |
†Taken from the PubChem database.
‡Partition into the hydrophobic core of lipid membranes.
Aquaporins have already been reported to act as an important pathway for volatile solutes (17). Although there is little doubt that they facilitate the membrane transport of NH3 (18), the contribution of aquaporins to NO, CO2, or O2 transport is under debate (19–23). At the same time as the permeability of PM,CO2 = 3.2 cm/s allows CO2 to pass membranes freely (22), the NH3 permeability PM,NH3 = 0.016 cm/s (24) indicates that a cholesterol-containing epithelial membrane acts as a barrier and, consequently, that membrane channels (aquaporin-8) facilitate NH3 diffusion (18). The different findings for NH3 and CO2 are in agreement with Overton's rule (25, 26) which, based on the biphasic partition coefficients (Table 1) predicts the large difference in PM.
If H2S passes membranes as fast as CO2, 1O2 or O2, its transport may actually be rate-limited by diffusion across so-called unstirred layers (USL) which are always present adjacent to membranes (27, 28). As transport across these stagnant water layers strictly occurs by diffusion, the H2S concentrations in the immediate membrane vicinity and in the bulk solution differ from one another. If not taken into account, this polarization hampers proper determination of PM.
The near-membrane solute polarization can be measured via SEM (28). An ion-sensitive microelectrode is moved toward the planar bilayer while recording the tiny concentration changes that accompany molecule diffusion through both USLs and the planar membrane. In the absence of a H2S electrode, a pH-sensitive microelectrode may instead be used, because at pH 7.4 the weak acid H2S (pKa = 6.89) acidifies the receiving compartment and augments pH in the donating compartment (compare Fig. 1). The spatially resolved steady-state pH shift within the USL enables determination of PM,H2S. We used an analytical model for this analysis which takes into account all relevant proton transfer reactions, including proton uptake and release by buffer molecules and the diffusion of all reactants (see Appendix).
Results
Hydrogen sulfide flux was induced by addition of NaHS to one side of the planar membrane, which is subsequently referred to as the cis side. To permeate the membrane, HS− has to pick up a proton at the cis membrane–water interface and to release a proton at the opposite (trans) interface. The resulting acidification in the trans USL was measured by a scanning pH microelectrode. As the H2S concentration increased, the pH shift within the trans USL also increased (Fig. 2A).
To obtain PM, the set of differential equations comprising our analytical model was fitted to the first 50 μm of the experimentally obtained pH profiles. The value of 0.05 cm/s represents the smallest PM for which a satisfactory fit was obtained. Calculation for PM > 0.05 cm/s resulted in theoretical pH profiles, which were indistinguishable from those obtained for PM = 0.05 cm/s. This observation indicates (i) that the value of 0.05 cm/s represents only the lower limit of PM, and (ii) that the limiting step of H2S transport across the planar bilayer is its diffusion through the USLs. The latter conclusion is illustrated by the plot of the corresponding theoretical H2S concentration profiles (Fig. 2B). They show that more than 99% of the H2S gradient is lost within the USLs.
A more precise determination of PM requires that permeation through the membrane be the rate-limiting step. As the concentration of the neutral species is pH-dependent, the rate-limiting step is expected to be a function of bulk pH, too. In contrast to USLs, which limit transport at neutral pH, the membrane may be rate-limiting at basic pH, as has been previously proven for other weak acids (29, 30). The switch in the limiting step may occur because (i) the total flux is much smaller at pH 8.9, as 98% of the weak acid H2S is charged, and (ii) the transmembrane flux affects the H2S concentration adjacent to the membrane to a much lower extent than the extremely fast proton uptake which constantly replenishes H2S. However, PM appeared to be so large that the above-mentioned mechanisms were insufficient to transform diffusion through the membrane into the rate-limiting step. The best fit of the analytical model to near-membrane pH profiles measured at various H2S concentrations revealed PM ≥ 0.5 cm/s (Fig. 3A). Calculation of the corresponding H2S concentration profile showed that the main resistance to H2S diffusion was still generated by USLs (Fig. 3B).
Because USLs adjacent to vascular endothelia are at least an order of magnitude smaller than those adjacent to planar bilayers, we calculated the contribution a 1-μm thick USL would offer to H2S membrane resistance. By solving the differential equations (see Appendix), we found that such an extremely thin USL accounts for ≈80% of the total membrane resistance to H2S (Fig. 4). This value decreases to 50% for δ ≈ 300 nm. That is, at room temperature AfAQP may double H2S membrane permeability if present at high surface density. At 80 °C—i.e., at temperatures comparable with those at which the A. fulgidus cytoplasmic membrane is physiologically exposed—the USL contributes more than 95% to the total resistance (Fig. 4), and AfAQP cannot significantly contribute to H2S membrane permeability.
Bilayer tightening by cholesterol and sphingomyelin decreases the diffusivity of small molecules, thereby increasing membrane resistance. For example, bilayer tightening decreases membrane permeability to water by up to tenfold (31, 32) and to ammonia by threefold (24). However, cholesterol- and sphingomyelin-containing bilayers had the same H2S permeability of PM ≥ 0.5 cm/s (Fig. 5), indicating that the membrane is not the limiting factor in H2S transport regardless of membrane composition.
If the resistance of the membrane to H2S flux is negligibly small, reconstitution of H2S-conducting channels should not alter this flux. We checked this hypothesis by reconstituting purified AfAQP into planar lipid membranes. The membranes were folded from monolayers on top of a proteoliposome suspension (33, 34) prepared from a natural mixture of Escherichia coli lipids. As anticipated, near-membrane acidification generated by a transmembrane H2S gradient was insensitive to the presence of AfAQP (Fig. 5). This result further confirmed that bilayer background conductivity was larger than any incremental conductivity that AfAQP might have introduced into the membrane.
AfAQP was fully functional in our planar bilayers, as revealed by water-flux measurements (Fig. 6). Addition of 1 M urea into the cis compartment resulted in dilution of sodium ions adjacent to the membrane. Measurements gathered by scanning sodium microelectrodes demonstrated a larger sodium-concentration drop for membranes containing the water channel AfAQP as compared with bare membranes. The osmotic permeabilities in the presence and the absence of AfAQP were 41 ± 3 μm and 23 ± 2 μm/s, respectively. We have also carried out stopped-flow measurements to visualize the rate at which proteoliposomes shrink when exposed to a hyperosmotic solution (Fig. S1). From the temperature dependence, we calculated that the activation energy for water flow through AfAQP amounts to 4.5 kcal/mole (Fig. S2).
Discussion
We have shown that membrane resistance to H2S permeation is negligible. Near-membrane USLs generate the major resistance to H2S transport. As a consequence, we were only able to determine the lower boundary of H2S permeability: PM is larger than 0.5 ± 0.4 cm/s. PM is thus approximately sixfold smaller than CO2 membrane permeability (22) and from threefold to 50-fold smaller than singlet oxygen and oxygen permeabilities (23, 35, 36), but at least an order of magnitude larger than NH3 permeability (18, 24).
Because of the large H2S background membrane permeability, a physiologically important contribution of aquaporins to H2S transport is very unlikely, a point that holds true even when considering that the unique structure of archaebacterial lipids lowers H2S permeability. For example, archaebacterial lipids reduce NH3 permeability by six- to tenfold (37), i.e., to an extent similar to cholesterol and sphingomyelin (31). Our experiment reveals an unmodified H2S permeability in the presence of cholesterol and sphingomyelin (Fig. 5), indicating that facilitation of transport by membrane channels is physiologically meaningless. The failure to observe facilitation of transmembrane H2S diffusion by AfAQP (Fig. 5) is in line with this conclusion.
At physiological pH, the acid–base equilibrium of CO2 and of NH3 is very much shifted to the charged forms HCO3− and NH4+, respectively. In contrast, approximately one third of H2S exists as a neutral molecule and two thirds as the hydro sulfide anion as indicated by the pK value of 6.89. Consequently, if it exists at all, transport of HS− by Cl− channels or other anion channels is not likely to play a physiologically relevant role. The flux JC through these channels would be negligible, as can be shown by a simple analysis of the ordinary flux equation
where Ac, AL, J, and JL are the area occupied by all anion channels, the area of the lipid pathway, the total flux, and the flux through the lipid matrix, respectively. [HS−]cis and [HS−]trans denote the HS− concentrations at both sides of the membrane. For pH 7.4, we can simplify the equation to
Substituting PCAC for turnover number per channel T and number of anion channels mA−, we arrive at
where VHS− and NA are the molecular volume of HS− and Avogrado's number, respectively. Because (i) the conductivity of a Cl− channel is usually miniscule (<10 pS)—that is, because T <107 s−1—and (ii) AcmA−< 2,000 channels μm−2, and (iii) AL>AC, Eq. 1 simplifies to
In the absence of any function in H2S transport, the only major remaining function of AfAQP is water transport. However, calculations of osmotic water permeability (Pf) reveal that equilibration of osmotic pressure gradients through the membrane of A. fulgidus should be fast even in the absence of AfAQP. Assuming that the cells are perfect spheres so that their initial volume V0 and surface A0 can be calculated from the diameter (d) of 600 nm (38):
Assuming a Pf of 20 μm/s, we arrive at a time constant τ of ≈700 ms, provided that the dependence of volume on time can be described by a single exponential. Even a fivefold increase in Pf due to AfAQP functioning would result in τ ≈ 140 ms. It is questionable whether this gain in water-transport rate provides a benefit in nature's selection process. The question mark on its physiological significance becomes even larger if we take into account that Pf of the lipid matrix at ambient temperatures as found in hot springs is, most probably, much higher. If we assume that the temperature dependence measured for E. coli lipids (33) holds, Pf would be elevated to ≈200 μm/s at 50 °C. To double Pf, aquaporins exhibiting a single-channel permeability, pf, of ≈1 × 10−14 cm/s at 23 °C and having an activation energy of 4.5 kcal/mol (Fig. S2) would have to be present at a density of 7,000 channels per μm2. Such a scenario is very unlikely because even in an aquaporin-rich tissue, such as that of red cells, the density is only ≈1,500 copies/μm2.
It could be argued that Pf of the archeal lipids may be very different from the Pf of E. coli lipids used in the present study. However, with ≈20 μm/s at room temperature, planar bilayers made of diphytanoyl lipids (39) have a Pf very close to planar bilayers from E. coli lipids (33, 34). Even in the case of liposomes made of tetraether lipids (archaea), which exhibit very low water permeability, the estimated permeability at its ambient growth temperature is ≈140 μm/s (37). Moreover, the main determinant for water flow through lipid bilayers has been shown to be the area per lipid (40, 41) and this parameter is similar for archeal lipids and those used in this study.
The argument that the single-channel permeability of AfAQP is exceptionally large does not hold either. As a simple calculation reveals, pf is ≈50% of that determined for aquaporin-Z in similar experiments (33): Pf is equal to the absolute hydraulic conductivity of all channels divided by the number of channels, n; n is anticipated to be equal to the total number of lipid molecules, L, in the bilayer divided by the molar lipid-to-protein ratio, r:
L is derived from two times the membrane area, A (because the membrane has two leaflets), divided by the area per lipid molecule, b. Assuming protein incorporation of ≈50% efficiency (42), pf was calculated to be 1 × 10−14 cm3/subunit/s. Thus, expression of AfAQP is unlikely to increase water flux through the archea in a hot spring. We conclude that the actual function of AfAQP still remains to be identified. The same holds for the homologous protein, aquaporin (AQPM) from M. marburgensis.
Similar to CO2 and O2, H2S partitions so easily into the hydrophobic core of the membrane that an aqueous pathway does not lower its energy barrier for membrane transport. NH3 remains the only volatile molecule that is transported by an aquaporin (18). In contrast to CO2 and O2, NH3 has a partition coefficient strongly favoring the aqueous over the hydrophobic environment (29, 35, 43). Consequently, the energy barrier for diffusion through phosphatidylcholine membranes increases to an extent at which it roughly matches the barrier required for the passage of an aqueous channel (20). NH3 transport through aquaporins becomes favorable only if the lipid barrier is increased by adding cholesterol or cholesterol and sphingomyelin (18). In contrast, the barrier for CO2, O2, and H2S transport through the lipid core of the membrane is always lower than the barrier provided by an aqueous channel.
Appendix.
In an aqueous environment H2S is a weak acid (pK = 6.89), which dissociates according to (compare Fig. 1):
For the analytical description of the coupled reaction diffusion system, the subsequent buffer reactions (pKTris = 8.2, pKMops = 7.14):
and water hydrolysis also have to be taken into account. Similar to previously published models of weak acid transport (22, 30), a set of coupled differential equations (based on Fick′s first and second laws) was solved numerically to derive the local steady-state concentrations of all reactants within the USLs:
with Ji, Di, and ci being the flux, diffusion constant, and concentrations, respectively, of the ith species in the cis and trans USLs adjacent to the membrane. The index i is assigned to 1 = H+, 2 = OH−, 3 = B (B denotes either Tris or Mops−), 4 = BH (BH denotes either TrisH+ or MOPSH), 5 = H2S, 6 = HS−, and 7 = H2O. Ri indicates the specific local rates of expenditure of corresponding chemical reactions.
All association rates, ka, were assumed to be ≥2*1010 dm3 mol−1 s−1 (44). The dissociation rates, kd, were calculated from the respective equilibrium constants (Ki = 10−pk,i = kd/ka) (30). At the water–bilayer phase boundary, all fluxes are required to be zero except for J5, thus allowing calculation of H2S membrane permeability by
Materials and Methods
Planar Lipid Membranes.
Free-standing bilayer lipid membranes (BLM) were formed from proteoliposomes as described previously (33, 34). In brief, BLM were folded across an aperture (150–250 μm in diameter) from the monolayers, which formed spontaneously on top of the vesicle suspension (45). The septum was pretreated with 0.5% hexadecane in hexane. The electrical membrane parameters (bilayer resistance and conductivity) were continuously monitored by a picoampermeter (VA10, NPI Electronic) connected via Ag/AgCl electrodes situated in the aqueous compartments next to the membrane. The solutions contained 100 mM NaCl (Merck) and were buffered with 5 mM Mops (Fluka). For the experiments at pH 8.9, Mops was substituted for equal amounts of Tris (Sigma–Aldrich). Magnetic stirring bars agitated the bathing solutions on both sides of the lipid membrane. After a stable lipid bilayer was formed, NaHS (Sigma–Aldrich) was added to the cis side and the chamber was covered with a lid. As the seal was not perfectly tight, the actual H2S concentration in the donating compartment was determined by conductivity measurements. Therefore, time-lapse experiments were performed in which the buffer solution was replaced by 5 mM imidazole.
Microelectrode Measurements.
We monitored steady-state acidification induced by transmembrane H2S flux adjacent to the membrane, as previously described for other weak acids (30). In brief, a pH microelectrode was moved perpendicularly to the lipid membrane by a micromanipulator (Narishige). The potential-changes at the tip of the pH-sensor were recorded with a high input-resistance electrometer (model 6514, Keithley) connected to a personal computer. The microelectrodes were made of borosilicate glass capillaries (GB150F-10, Science Products) pulled to a tip diameter of 2–4 μm, silanized with Bis(dimethylamino)dimethylsilane (Fluka) and filled with a proton-sensitive mixture (Hydrogen Ionophore II mixture A, Selectophore, Fluka). All microelectrode measurements were carried out at 23 °C.
The experiments were done while continuously stirring the bulk solutions. The system would otherwise not have reached steady state within a reasonable amount of time. Because an exact analytical solution for the combined processes of convection, diffusion, and chemical reactions is not available for the geometry of the measurement chamber, we restricted the mathematical analyses to concentrations measured within the first 50 μm from the membrane. In this region, the stirring velocity is negligible small and transport is assumed to occur only by diffusion.
Protein Expression, Purification and Reconstitution.
The AfAQP gene was amplified from a plasmid containing the A. fulgidus AfAQP gene, obtained from ATCC (catalog no. 630307R) by PCR, and the A.fulgidus AQP gene was inserted into a pET28b expression vector (Novagen) with an N-terminal octahistidine (His-8)-affinity tag followed by a human rhinovirus 3C protease site. E. coli Bl21(DE3)RIL cells (Stratagene) were transformed with the plasmid containing the AfAQP gene and plated on LB agar containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 35 μg/mL chloramphenicol. All cultures were grown in autoinduction LB media containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 35 μg/mL chloramphenicol at 37 °C in Fernbach flasks shaking at 200 rpm. For expression, each liter of growth media was inoculated with 25 mL of an overnight culture started from a freshly transformed colony and allowed to grow for 16 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation for 15 min at 5,000 × g and 4 °C. The pelleted cells were resuspended in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA and 1 mM PMSF, and lysed with 3–5 passages at 15,000 psi in an EmulsiFlex-C5 high-pressure homogenizer (Avestin). The membranes were pelleted by ultracentrifugation at 160,000 × g for 1 h (at 4 °C). The membrane was immediately resuspended in solubilization buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, 10% (vol/vol) glycerol. The protein was solubilized by adding octyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (OG, Anatrace) to a final concentration of 5% to the resuspended membranes and stirred at 4 °C for 3 h. Unsolubilized material was pelleted by ultracentrifugation at 160,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant was loaded onto a column containing 3–5 mL of nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni–NTA) resin (Qiagen), washed consecutively with a wash buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 300 mM NaCl, 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, 40 mM imidazole, 1.2% OG), and then eluted with same buffer containing 300 mM imidazole. Imidazole was removed by using an Econo-Pac DG10 desalting column (Bio-Rad). The histidine affinity tag was removed by using excess 3C protease at room temperature for 12–16 h. The final protein-purification step was achieved by size-exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 200 column (GE Biosciences) in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1.2% OG and 10% (vol/vol) glycerol. The purity of the preparation was checked by Coomassie staining (Fig. S3). Protein reconstitution into proteoliposomes was generally performed as previously described (15).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank Quentina Beatty for proofreading the manuscript. This project was supported by Austrian Science Fund Grant FWF W1201-N13 (to P.P.) and National Institues of Health Grants DK43955 and DK048217 (to M.Z.L. and J.C.M.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0902952106/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Lefer DJ. A new gaseous signaling molecule emerges: Cardioprotective role of hydrogen sulfide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:17907–17908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709010104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhao W, Zhang J, Lu Y, Wang R. The vasorelaxant effect of H2S as a novel endogenous gaseous KATP channel opener. EMBO J. 2001;20:6008–6016. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.21.6008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pryor WA, et al. Free radical biology and medicine: It's a gas, man! Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;291:R491–R511. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00614.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Elrod JW, et al. Hydrogen sulfide attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by preservation of mitochondrial function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:15560–15565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705891104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yang G, et al. H2S as a physiologic vasorelaxant: Hypertension in mice with deletion of cystathionine gamma-lyase. Science. 2008;322:587–590. doi: 10.1126/science.1162667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li L, et al. Hydrogen sulfide is a novel mediator of lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in the mouse. FASEB J. 2005;19:1196–1198. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3583fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zanardo RCO, et al. Hydrogen sulfide is an endogenous modulator of leukocyte-mediated inflammation. FASEB J. 2006;20:2118–2120. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6270fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Abe K, Kimura H. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous neuromodulator. J Neurosci. 1996;16:1066–1071. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-01066.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kamoun P. Endogenous production of hydrogen sulfide in mammals. Amino Acids. 2004;26:243–254. doi: 10.1007/s00726-004-0072-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Boehning D, Snyder SH. Novel neural modulators. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:105–131. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Reiffenstein, et al. Toxicology of hydrogen sulfide. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992;32:109–134. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.32.040192.000545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li L, Moore PK. Putative biological roles of hydrogen sulfide in health and disease: a breath of not so fresh air? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Calhoun DB, Englander SW, Wright WW, Vanderkooi JM. Quenching of room temperature protein phosphorescence by added small molecules. Biochemistry. 1988;27:8466–8474. doi: 10.1021/bi00422a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Deamer DW, Bramhall J. Permeability of lipid bilayers to water and ionic solutes. Chem Phys Lipids. 1986;40:167–188. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(86)90069-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee JK, et al. Structural basis for conductance by the archaeal aquaporin AqpM at 1.68 A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:18932–18937. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509469102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kozono D, et al. Functional expression and characterization of an archaeal aquaporin. AqpM from methanothermobacter marburgensis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:10649–10656. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212418200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Boron WF. Acid-base transport by the renal proximal tubule. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2368–2382. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006060620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Saparov SM, Liu K, Agre P, Pohl P. Fast and selective ammonia transport by aquaporin-8. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5296–5301. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609343200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Herrera M, Hong NJ, Garvin JL. Aquaporin-1 transports NO across cell membranes. Hypertension. 2006;48:157–164. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000223652.29338.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hub JS, de Groot BL. Mechanism of selectivity in aquaporins and aquaglyceroporins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:1198–1203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707662104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Missner A, Pohl P. 110 years of the Meyer-Overton rule: Predicting membrane permeability of gases and other small compounds. ChemPhysChem. 2009;10:1405–1414. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200900270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Missner A, et al. Carbon dioxide transport through membranes. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:25340–25347. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800096200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sokolov VS, Pohl P. Membrane transport of singlet oxygen monitored by dipole potential measurements. Biophys J. 2009;96:77–85. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.135145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Antonenko YN, Pohl P, Denisov GA. Permeation of ammonia across bilayer lipid membranes studied by ammonium ion selective microelectrodes. Biophys J. 1997;72:2187–2195. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78862-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Al-Awqati Q. One hundred years of membrane permeability: Does Overton still rule? Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:E201–E202. doi: 10.1038/70230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Saparov SM, Antonenko YN, Pohl P. A new model of weak acid permeation through membranes revisited: Does Overton still rule? Biophys J. 2006;90:L86–L88. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.084343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barry PH, Diamond JM. Effects of unstirred layers on membrane phenomena. Physiol Rev. 1984;64:763–872. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1984.64.3.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pohl P, Saparov SM, Antonenko YN. The size of the unstirred layer as a function of the solute diffusion coefficient. Biophys J. 1998;75:1403–1409. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74058-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Walter A, Gutknecht J. Permeabilities of small neonelectrolytes through lipid bilayer membranes. J Membr Biol. 1986;90:207–217. doi: 10.1007/BF01870127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Antonenko YN, Denisov GA, Pohl P. Weak acid transport across bilayer lipid membrane in the presence of buffers—Theoretical and experimental pH profiles in the unstirred layers. Biophys J. 1993;64:1701–1710. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81542-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Krylov AV, Pohl P, Zeidel ML, Hill WG. Water permeability of asymmetric planar lipid bilayers: Leaflets of different composition offer independent and additive resistances to permeation. J Gen Physiol. 2001;118:333–340. doi: 10.1085/jgp.118.4.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lande MB, Donovan JM, Zeidel ML. The relationship between membrane fluidity and permeabilities to water, solutes, ammonia, and protons. J Gen Physiol. 1995;106:67–84. doi: 10.1085/jgp.106.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pohl P, Saparov SM, Borgnia MJ, Agre P. High selectivity of water channel activity measured by voltage clamp: Analysis of planar lipid bilayers reconstituted with purified AqpZ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:9624–9629. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161299398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Saparov SM, Kozono D, Rothe U, Agre P, Pohl P. Water and ion permeation of aquaporin-1 in planar lipid bilayers: Major differences in structural determinants and stoichiometry. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:31515–31520. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104267200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Subczynski WK, Hyde JS, Kusumi A. Oxygen permeability of phosphatidylcholine–cholesterol membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:4474–4478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.12.4474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dzikovski BG, Livshits VA, Marsh D. Oxygen permeation profile in lipid membranes: Comparison with transmembrane polarity profile. Biophys J. 2003;85:1005–1012. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74539-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mathai JC, Sprott GD, Zeidel ML. Molecular mechanisms of water and solute transport across archaebacterial lipid membranes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:27266–27271. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103265200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Illsley NP, Verkman AS. Serial permeability barriers to water transport in human placental vesicles. J Membr Biol. 1986;94:267–278. doi: 10.1007/BF01869722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pohl P, Saparov SM. Solvent drag across gramicidin channels demonstrated by microelectrodes. Biophys J. 2000;78:2426–2434. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76786-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mathai JC, Tristram-Nagle S, Nagle JF, Zeidel ML. Structural determinants of water permeability through the lipid membrane. J Gen Physiol. 2008;131:69–76. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200709848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nagle JF, Mathai JC, Zeidel ML, Tristram-Nagle S. Theory of passive permeability through lipid bilayers. J Gen Physiol. 2008;131:77–85. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200709849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ehring GR, Zampighi G, Horwitz J, Bok D, Hall JE. Properties of channels reconstituted from the major intrinsic protein of lens fiber membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1990;96:631–664. doi: 10.1085/jgp.96.3.631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Simon SA, Gutknecht J. Solubility of carbon dioxide in lipid bilayer membranes and organic solvents. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;596:352–358. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(80)90122-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gutman M, Nachliel E. Time-resolved dynamics of proton transfer in proteinous systems. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 1997;48:329–356. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schindler H. Planar lipid-protein membranes: strategies of formation and of detecting dependencies of ion transport functions on membrane conditions. Methods Enzymol. 1989;171:225–253. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(89)71014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tamimi A, Rinker EB, Sandall OC. Diffusion-coefficients for hydrogen-sulfide, carbon-dioxide, and nitrous-oxide in water over the temperature-range 293–368-K. J Chem Eng Data. 1994;39:330–332. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.