Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2007 Oct 26;115(6):927–933. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.010

Table 2.

Mixed model of predictive factors for baseline intraocular pressure (IOP)

Variables* Estimate (SE) P-Value
Age (10 year increments) −0.67 (0.20) 0.0010
Sex (female vs. male) −2.35 (0.44) <0.0001
Glaucoma diagnosis (vs. Primary open
angle glaucoma, n=550)
  Pigmentary (n=28) +0.05 (1.05) 0.9591
  Pseudoexfoliative (n=29) +5.40 (1.03) <0.0001
Pupillary response (defect vs. normal) +2.24 (0.72) 0.0018
Center (vs. overall mean effect) 0.0002
  Lower than mean IOP:
  Center B −2.07 (1.25)
  Center E −2.03 (0.69)
  Center M −2.03 (0.86)
  Center C −0.86 (1.18)
  Center J −0.73 (0.80)
  Center F −0.47 (0.68)
  Center L −0.39 (1.49)
  Higher than mean IOP:
  Center K +0.17 (0.71)
  Center N +0.90 (0.80)
  Center G +0.96 (0.68)
  Center I +1.25 (0.69)
  Center A +1.65 (0.66)
  Center D +1.77 (0.82)
  Center H +1.88 (0.73)
*

All variables listed were entered into a single, multivariable model. Day, order, and day × order interaction (P<0.002) were also included in the model. See Table 1 for day and order effects.

Significantly different from the overall mean baseline IOP