Abstract
This study was conducted to determine genetic diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Staphylococcus aureus recovered from bovine mastitis in Zhejiang Province, China. Out of 3178 quarter milk samples from 846 lactating cows, among which 459 cows (54.3%) were found HMT positive, 890 quarters (28%) were found having subclinical mastitis. From 75 representative S. aureus isolates, 16 distinct types were identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Four major PFGE types (A, B, C, and D) accounted for 82.7% of all isolates, and type A (41.3%) was observed in multiple herds across the studied areas. Each region was found to have a predominant type: Hangzhou type A (64.1%), Ningbo type C (34.5%) and type B (23.1%), Jinhua type D (53.3%), and Taizhou type C (62.5%). Results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests showed that 90.7% of the isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial. Resistance to penicillin and ampicillin (77.3%), tetracycline (60.0%), or erythromycin (48.0%) was observed. The bacteria resistant to multiple antibiotics such as penicillin, ampicillin, tetracycline, and erythromycin were commonly found. The information obtained from this study is useful for designing specific control programs for bovine S. aureus mastitis in this region.
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, Bovine mastitis, Antimicrobial resistance, Genetic diversity, Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
INTRODUCTION
Bovine mastitis is a complex and economically important infectious disease for dairy cattle throughout the world, which can result in substantial losses due to reduced milk yield, and increase culling rates and veterinary expenses (Miles et al., 1992). Subclinical mastitis, without any signs of inflammation compared with clinical mastitis, is the main form of the disease, and accounts for the majority of bovine mastitis cases in dairy herds (Oliver et al., 2004). One of the most important causes of bovine subclinical mastitis is the intramammary infection (IMI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus, which is difficult to eradicate (Østeras et al., 2006; Ferguson et al., 2007).
Genetic characterization of mastitis-causing S. aureus isolates is vital for an effective mastitis control program, especially for developing a vaccine against S. aureus. With the development of molecular biology techniques, microbiologists have more choices for epidemiologic typing of S. aureus isolates at the present time. A discriminatory and reliable molecular typing method for the identification of bacterial isolates at strain level is the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (Tenover et al., 1995; Peacock et al., 2002), which has successfully been used by many researchers in the field of molecular subtyping of mastitis-causing S. aureus (Fueyo et al., 2005; Haveri et al., 2007; Rabello et al., 2005; Sabour et al., 2004). So far, however, there is little literature available on this field in China.
As a remedy antimicrobials are used very frequently for infectious diseases on dairy farms (Kaneene and Miller, 1992; Sandgren et al., 2008), but the therapeutic outcome of S. aureus causing disease is poor, in part due to the versatile ability of the pathogen (Archer, 1998; Owens et al., 1988; Sol et al., 2000). Therefore, selection of a more effective drug for staphylococcal mastitis therapy by the evaluation of antimicrobial resistance may become a reality to clinical veterinarians.
Dairy cattle are economically important animals in Zhejiang Province, China. There are four major dairy farming regions that constitute over 80% of the dairy cow population in this province. To our knowledge, no study has been performed to investigate genetic diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles among S. aureus isolates recovered from bovine mastitis in this area. The objectives of the present study, therefore, were to estimate the prevalence of bovine mastitis, compare genetic relatedness and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of S. aureus isolated from mastitic milk from different regions of Zhejiang Province in order to provide a useful guide for veterinary practice in the treatment of S. aureus mastitis, and design mastitis control strategies directed to specific strains.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Prevalence of subclinical mastitis and Staphylococcus aureus
The study was conducted in the period of April 2007 to June 2008 in four major dairy farming regions of Zhejiang Province, namely, Hangzhou, Jinhua, Ningbo, and Taizhou. To achieve representative distribution of parameters concerning size, location, and milking mode across the province, data were collected from 30 dairy farms. The herd structure was characterized by large-scale state-owned dairy farms and smallholder farms varied from 1200 to 20 cows per herd and the Chinese Holstein cow breed comprised the majority of cows. A total of 3178 quarter milk samples from 846 lactating cows without clinical signs of mastitis were investigated.
Analysis of milk samples
The incidence of subclinical mastitis was determined at cow and quarter levels based on indirect tests (Hangzhou mastitis test (HMT)). Mastitic paddle wells were used to collect milk from individual quarters, ensuring that the premilk was discarded. The procedures and the interpretation were performed using HMT test according to Hu et al.(1990). Samples with an HMT score of 0 or 1 were considered negative. Cows with an HMT score ≥1+ in one quarter but without clinical signs of mastitis were considered to have subclinical mastitis. Aseptic collection of quarter milk samples with HMT score of 2 or 3 were carried out for bacteriological assay.
Identification of S. aureus was done according to the standard routine (National Mastitis Council, 1999) and confirmed by the API STAPH® identification system.
After the investigation, 2~10 S. aureus strains for a herd were randomly chosen for antimicrobial susceptibility test and genotyping according to epidemiological distribution across the province, taking the size, location, and milking mode of the farms into consideration.
Antimicrobial susceptibility test
The disk diffusion method, an in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test of the S. aureus isolates, was performed according to the guideline of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS, 2002). The antimicrobial agents tested were selected based on two factors, the recommendation of NCCLS and the actual veterinary practice, and included ampicillin (10 μg/disk), cefoxitin (30 μg/disk), cefalotin (30 μg/disk), chloramphenicol (30 μg/disk), erythromycin (15 μg/disk), gentamicin (10 μg/disk), oxacillin (1 μg/disk), penicillin G (10 IU/disk), tetracycline (30 μg/disk), clindamycin (2 μg/disk), ciprofloxacin (5 μg/disk), and vancomycin (30 μg/disk). Results were recorded as sensitive and resistant. Antimicrobial disks were purchased from Tianhe (Tianhe microbial reagent Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). The strain S. aureus ATCC 25923 was used as the control strain.
Molecular typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
Molecular typing of S. aureus isolates was performed using restriction enzyme SmaI (TaKaRa Corp., Japan) and subsequent PFGE according to the method of McDougal et al.(2003). PFGE was run on the CHEF Mapper (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using 1% (w/v) SeaKem Gold agarose (Cambrex Bio Science, Rockland, ME, USA) with 0.5× Tris-borate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (1 mol/L Tris, 0.01 mol/L EDTA, and 1 mol/L boric acid) as running buffer. A Salmonella serotype Braenderup strain (H9812) digested with XbaI was used as size standards, which were run in the first, middle, and last lanes of each gel. The electrophoresis conditions were as follows: 14 °C, 120° ramp angle, 5 s to 40 s pulse time, 19 h at 6 V/cm.
Macrorestriction bands were analyzed by using visual judgment according to criteria proposed by Tenover et al.(1995) and using the BioNumerics software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) with Dice coefficients. Similarity was calculated on a dendrogram using the unweighted-pair group method with arithmetic means. Position tolerance and optimization were set at 1.2% and 1.0%, respectively. A similarity coefficient of 80% was selected to define the pulsed-field type clusters.
RESULTS
Incidence of subclinical intramammary infections and frequency of Staphylococcus aureus infection in four different regions
From a total of 846 clinically healthy lactating cows, 459 (54.3%) were found with 1 or more quarters HMT positive. Out of 3178 quarters, 890 (28.0%) were HMT positive. The highest prevalence in cow and quarter levels was found to be 69.7% and 36.4%, respectively in Ningbo. The prevalence of subclinical mastitis at cow and quarter levels in different regions is presented in detail in Table 1.
Table 1.
Region | Number of farms | Cow level |
Quarter level |
Prevalence of S. aureus (%) | ||
n | % | n | % | |||
Jinhua | 8 | 340 | 51.8 | 1235 | 24.5 | 9.7 |
Hangzhou | 5 | 168 | 54.8 | 645 | 29.3 | 27.9 |
Ningbo | 7 | 208 | 69.7 | 797 | 36.4 | 3.3 |
Taizhou | 10 | 130 | 40.8 | 501 | 21.8 | 8.4 |
Total | 30 | 846 | 54.3 | 3178 | 28.0 | 12.2 |
Rates of S. aureus detected from quarters with HMT score of 2 or 3 varied greatly in different regions (Table 1). The overall prevalence of this pathogen was 12.2% ranging from 3.3% to 27.9% in different regions. S. aureus IMIs were identified in 23 (76.7%) out of the 30 farms investigated. A total of 108 S. aureus isolates were recovered from mastitic milk. Subsequently, 75 representative S. aureus isolates were submitted to antimicrobial susceptibility test and genotyping.
Antimicrobial susceptibility
The test was performed in a satisfactory manner when the quality control strains produced values within the established ranges. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 12 antimicrobial agents against 75 representative S. aureus isolates from 4 different regions is presented in Table 2. Seven isolates (9.3% of total) were susceptible to all drugs tested. The remaining 68 isolates (90.7%) were resistant to at least 1 antimicrobial class. S. aureus isolates were observed mostly resistant to penicillin and ampicillin (77.3%), while it appeared non-resistant to cefalotin and vancomycin throughout the region. The proportion of S. aureus isolates resistant to gentamicin, chloromycetin, clindamycin, tetracycline, and erythromycin varied greatly among the four regions. Nevertheless, oxacillin and cefoxitin exhibited minimum antibacterial-resistance to all the strains tested. Resistance to multiple antibiotics such as penicillin, ampicillin, tetracycline, and erythromycin was common among the bacterial isolates. Six major resistance patterns were observed among the isolates: no resistance (pattern I: 9.3%), penicillin/ampicillin resistance (pattern II: 21.3%), penicillin/ampicillin/tetracycline/erythromycin resistance (pattern III: 27.5%), penicillin/ampicillin/erythromycin/tetracycline/gentamicin resistance (pattern IV: 15.7%), penicillin/ampicillin/erythromycin/tetracycline/chloromycetin/clindamycin resistance (pattern V: 8.3%), and tetracycline resistance (pattern VI: 6.2%). Most of the staphylococci isolates belonged to patterns II and III. In addition, 2 or 3 predominant resistance patterns were noticeable in each of the regions analyzed.
Table 2.
Antimicrobial | Percentage of resistant isolates (%) |
||||
Hangzhou (n=39) | Jinhua (n=15) | Ningbo (n=13) | Taizhou (n=8) | Total (n=75) | |
Penicillin | 78.9 | 88.9 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 77.3 |
Ampicillin | 78.9 | 88.9 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 77.3 |
Oxacillin | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
Cefalotin | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Cefoxitin | 2.6 | 5.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.7 |
Ciprofloxacin | 5.3 | 22.2 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 8.0 |
Gentamicin | 18.4 | 44.4 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 28.0 |
Chloromycetin | 13.2 | 61.1 | 20.0 | 62.5 | 29.3 |
Clindamycin | 15.8 | 72.2 | 0.0 | 62.5 | 29.3 |
Tetracycline | 68.4 | 94.4 | 20.0 | 12.5 | 60.0 |
Erythromycin | 36.8 | 88.9 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 48.0 |
Vancomycin | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Main resistance patterns | Patterns II, III, IV | Patterns II, III, V | Patterns I, II | Patterns III, IV |
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
Of the 75 representative S. aureus isolates collected from 23 herds in the 4 regions, PFGE can type all of the isolates, and 39 distinct PFGE patterns were identified (Fig.1). According to genetic relationships, the 39 PFGE patterns were assigned to 16 lineage groups, designated as pulsed-field types with a capital letter, and patterns within these lineages were represented by designations with numeric suffixes. The dendrogram in Fig.1 demonstrates the banding patterns and genetic relationships. Four major types represented 82.7% of all isolates. Being the largest group among the 75 isolates, type A accounted for 31 (41.3%) of all of the isolates, which were distributed in multiple herds across the 4 regions. Different types predominated in each region, observed as: Hangzhou type A (64.1%), Ningbo type C (34.5%) and type B (23.1%), Jinhua type D (53.3%), and Taizhou type C (62.5%).
Nearly two thirds of the herds with S. aureus infection exhibited a unique type, whereas type A was observed in multiple herds (n=9, 47.4%) for all of the area (Table 3). No farm was found to have more than three types.
Table 3.
Farms | Distribution |
|
n | % | |
One type only | 10 | 43.5 |
Two types | 7 | 30.4 |
Three types | 6 | 26.1 |
More than three types | 0 | 0 |
DISCUSSION
Subclinical mastitis is hard to detect and is the main form of mastitis (Oliver et al., 2004; Pitkala et al., 2004). In China, many researchers reported that 40%~80% of lactating dairy cows in most farms suffer from subclinical mastitis (Pan et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2005). The present study shows a high prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in Zhejiang Province identified by HMT, a qualitative measurement of the somatic cell count in milk that can be easily used at cow side. The overall prevalence of subclinical mastitis in this study was 54.3% on cow basis and 28.0% on an udder quarter basis. Among different regions, the prevalence ranged from 40.8% to 69.7% on cow basis and 21.8% to 36.4% on an udder quarter basis. The results are consistent with the previous findings of Zhang et al.(2005), who reported a prevalence of 48.1% and 22.4% in cow and quarter in Jinhua, a region of Zhejiang Province. The variation in prevalence of mastitis observed among the four regions in the present investigation may be due to differences in husbandry condition and management, as well as a lack of a mastitis-control program in certain areas.
As a major contagious pathogen associated with bovine mastitis, S. aureus frequently causes subclinical chronic infections of the mammary gland in dairy cows (Østeras et al., 2006; Wilson et al., 1997). In United Kingdom, with the implementation of the Five-Point Plan there has been a dramatic decrease in the prevalence of contagious mastitis pathogens, especially for S. aureus, from 67 quarter case/100 cows per year in 1967 to 2.2 quarter case/100 cows per year in 1998 (Bradley, 2002). In China, however, S. aureus isolates have been reported to be involved in about 10%~50% of mastitic milk samples from dairy cows (Hu et al., 1998; Liu et al., 2007). In the current study, our results demonstrate that 76.7% of the examined herds suffered from S. aureus infection, and the overall prevalence of this pathogen is 12.2% in quarter milk samples with HMT score of 2 or 3. It is worth to note, however, that the prevalence of S. aureus can vary greatly among different regions, ranging from 27.9% to 3.3% in the present investigation.
Bacterial resistance has been reported for more than 30 years and S. aureus is the most extensively studied pathogen in dairy diseases (Lowy, 2003). Many authors had reported resistant strains in S. aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in different countries (Moroni et al., 2006; Gentilini et al., 2000; de Oliveira et al., 2000). In our study, the rate of resistant strains was high (90.7%), and resistance to penicillin G and ampicillin (77.3%) was the most frequently observed. This is in a good agreement with the results reported by Wang et al.(2007) and Liu et al.(2007), regarding S. aureus isolated from mastitis infected cows in China, but much higher than those reported for S. aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitic milk in Europe and the United States (de Oliveira et al., 2000). Intensive, empirical or inappropriate use of antimicrobial drugs as a treatment for dairy diseases may be a plausible explanation for the higher antibiotics resistance in S. aureus in China. This is further confirmed by the lower levels of resistance reported in Nordic countries, such as Denmark and Norway, where strict antimicrobial management policy is existing in veterinary practices (Pitkala et al., 2004). To our knowledge, clindamycin and chloromycetin are rarely used to treat bovine mastitis in Zhejiang Province, but, surprisingly, resistance to these antimicrobial agents was observed. Perhaps, intensive use of these antimicrobial agents as a therapy for other infectious diseases in dairy farms can be attributed to this resistance; therefore, considerable attention is needed in the future.
The emergence of multi antimicrobial-resistance is usually observed among bovine isolates (Gentilini et al., 2000; Waage et al., 2002). In Shitandil and Sternesjö (2004)’s study, 34.3% and 18.0% S. aureus isolates recovered from small and large farms, respectively, developed resistance to two or more antimicrobial drugs. Resistance to penicillin and ampicillin was also common in other countries (de Oliveira et al., 2000). The present study shows that more than 80% of S. aureus strains were resistant to more than one antimicrobial agent tested, and the predominant pattern was simultaneously resistant to penicillin, ampicillin, tetracycline, and erythromycin, which is consistent with the findings of Wang et al. (2007). Those antimicrobial drugs are the largest group involving the treatment of infectious diseases in dairy farms in China. The current study shows that variation for antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of S. aureus also exists in different regions, which may be associated with complicated reasons, such as different habits of clinical veterinary in selection of therapeutic drugs. These results may provide important knowledge for the development of effective control strategies for S. aureus mastitis in Zhejiang Province.
PFGE is considered to be the ‘gold standard’ for molecular typing of pathogenic bacteria regarding its discriminatory ability, reproducibility, and typeability, which has been recommended to type S. aureus isolates (Weller, 2000). In this study, genetic diversity of 75 representative S. aureus isolates recovered from different regions in Zhejiang Province was examined by PFGE. This may be the first time that PFGE is used in this field in China. For the genetic diversity of mastitis-causing S. aureus, some investigations revealed that some predominant strains can exist in different dairy farms, even in different countries (Fox et al., 1991; Smith et al., 2005). On the contrary, Joo et al.(2001) reported that S. aureus types associated with IMI were much more likely to be unique to a herd than to be found in multiple herds. In the current study, type A was represented by 41.3% of isolates analyzed and was recovered from a number of herds, which is consistent with the findings of Smith et al. (2005). Accordingly, it can be inferred that some strains prevailing among herds, even in different regions, have some advantages of infecting due likely to special combination of virulence factors. On the other hand, nearly two thirds of herds with S. aureus infection had a unique type, which is in agreement with the results reported by Joo et al.(2001). Therefore, both situations may exist simultaneously. Geographical variation in the distribution of major prevalent types was also noted among different regions in the current investigation. So, comparison of predominant and minor strains in different regions or herds can be an important preliminary study for a successful herd autogenous S. aureus vaccination program. Further studies are needed to elucidate potential combination of virulence factors that favor the advantages within particular geographical environment.
An association between bovine mastitis-causing S. aureus PFGE type and antimicrobial susceptibility phenotypes was reported by Anderson et al.(2006). However, in our study agreement between antimicrobial resistance patterns and particular S. aureus PFGE types was not observed for most isolates, except that tetracycline resistance was not found in type C. Disparate results may be derived from a much higher degree of resistance of S. aureus isolates in our study.
In conclusion, the present study describes the S. aureus genotypes responsible for the mastitis cases in different dairy regions of Zhejiang Province, China. This information might help in formulating strategies to alleviate S. aureus mastitis. Furthermore, antimicrobial susceptibility test of S. aureus could be used as a guide to select antimicrobials for the therapy of mammary infections.
Acknowledgments
The instrument for PFGE was provided by 985 Agricultural Biotechnology and Environmental Science and Technology Innovation Platform, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. The authors also thank Prof. Chuan-xi Zhang, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, China, for his kind help in providing PFGE equipment.
Footnotes
Project (No. 2005C12015) supported by the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province, China
References
- 1.Anderson KL, Lyman RL, Bodeis-Jones SM, White DG. Genetic diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles among mastitis-causing Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine milk samples. Am J Vet Res. 2006;67(7):1185–1191. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.67.7.1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Archer GL. Staphylococcus aureus: a well-armed pathogen. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(5):1179–1181. doi: 10.1086/520289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bradley AJ. Bovine mastitis: an evolving disease. Vet J. 2002;164(2):116–128. doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2002.0724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Oliveira AP, Watts JL, Salmon SA, Aarestrup FM. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Europe and the United States. J Dairy Sci. 2000;83(4):855–862. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74949-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ferguson JD, Azzaro G, Gambina M, Licitra G. Prevalence of mastitis pathogens in Ragusa, Sicily, from 2000 to 2006. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(12):5798–5813. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fox LK, Gershman M, Hancock DD, Hutton C. Fomites and reservoirs of Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infections: the effect of milking time hygiene. Cornell Vet. 1991;81(2):183–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fueyo JM, Mendoza MC, Rodicio MR, Muñiz J, Alvarez MA, Martín MC. Cytotoxin and pyrogenic toxin superantigen gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus associated with subclinical mastitis in dairy cows and relationships with macrorestriction genomic profiles. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(3):1278–1284. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1278-1284.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gentilini E, Denamiel G, Llarente P, Godaly S, Rebuelto M, DeGregorio O. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Argentina. J Dairy Sci. 2000;83(6):1224–1227. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74988-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haveri M, Roslöf A, Rantala L, Pyörälä S. Virulence genes of bovine Staphylococcus aureus from persistent and nonpersistent intramammary infections with different clinical characteristics. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103(4):993–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hu SH, Zhu PM, Jiang CS. The relationship between reaction grades of Hangzhou mastitis test (HMT) agent and milk somatic cell counts. Chin J Vet Med. 1990;16(10):8–9. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hu SH, Du AF, Cai WM. Bacteriological analysis of bovine clinical and subclinical mastitis. Chin J Anim Poul Infect Dis. 1998;20(4):199–201. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 12.Joo YS, Fox LK, Davis WC, Bohach GA, Park YH. Staphylococcus aureus associated with mammary glands of cows: genotyping to distinguish different strains among herds. Vet Microbiol. 2001;80(2):131–138. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00381-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kaneene JB, Miller R. Description and evaluation of the influence of veterinary presence on the use of antibiotics and sulfonamides in dairy herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992;201(1):68–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu C, Wang JR, Zhang CD, Wu B, Han YP, Zhao B, Yu YJ, Wang JH, Liu YB, Cheng GB, et al. Isolation, identification and analysis of drug resistance of mastitis-causing pathogens from Hubei. China Dairy Cattle. 2007;7:35–38. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lowy FD. Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus . J Clin Invest. 2003;111(9):1265–1273. doi: 10.1172/JCI200318535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McDougal LK, Steward CD, Killgore GE, Chaitram JM, McAllister SK, Tenover FC. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(11):5113–5120. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5113-5120.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Miles H, Lesser W, Sears P. The economic implications of bioengineered mastitis control. J Dairy Sci. 1992;75(2):596–605. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77797-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moroni P, Pisoni G, Antonini M, Villa R, Boettcher P, Carli S. Antimicrobial drug susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus from subclinical bovine mastitis in Italy. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89(8):2973–2976. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72569-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals. Wayne, PA: 2002. Approved Standard. NCCLS Document M31-A2. [Google Scholar]
- 20.National Mastitis Council. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. National Mastitis Council, Inc; 1999. pp. 71–76. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Oliver SP, Gillespie BE, Headrick SJ, Moorehead A, Lunn P, Dowlen HH, Johnson DL, Lamar KC, Chester ST, Moseley WM. Efficacy of extended ceftiofur intramammary therapy for treatment of subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87(8):2393–2400. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73361-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Østeras O, Sølverød L, Reksen O. Milk culture results in a large Norwegian survey: effects of season, parity, days in milk, resistance, and clustering. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89(3):1010–1023. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72167-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Owens WE, Watts JL, Boddie RL, Nickerson SC. Antibiotic treatment of mastitis: comparison of intramammary and intramammary plus intramuscular therapies. J Dairy Sci. 1988;71(11):3143–3147. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79915-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pan H, Liu CC, Zhang LH, Zhang ZC, Yu J, Yuan YL, Li HS, Hou YZ, Yang YY, Li XP. Etiology and pathogenesis survey of bovine mastitis in some regions of China. Chin J Vet Sci Technol. 1996;26(2):16–17. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peacock SJ, de Silva GD, Justice A, Cowland A, Moore CE, Winearls CG, Day NP. Comparison of multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as tools for typing Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a microepidemiological Setting. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(10):3764–3770. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3764-3770.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pitkala A, Haveri M, Pyorala S, Myllys V, Honkanen-Buzalski T. Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001: Prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87(8):2433–2441. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73366-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rabello RF, Souza CRVM, Duarte RS, Lopes RMM, Teixeira LM, Castro ACD. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from bovine mastitis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88(9):3211–3219. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sabour PM, Gill JJ, Lepp D, Pacan JC, Ahmed R, Dingwell R, Leslie K. Molecular typing and distribution of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in eastern Canadian dairy herds. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(8):3449–3455. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3449-3455.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sandgren CH, Waller KP, Emanuelson U. Therapeutic effects of systemic or intramammary antimicrobial treatment of bovine subclinical mastitis during lactation. Vet J. 2008;175(1):108–117. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shitandil A, Sternesjö Å. Prevalence of multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus in milk from large- and small-scale producers in Kenya. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87(12):4145–4149. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73557-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Smith EM, Green LE, Medley GF, Bird HE, Fox LK, Schukken YH, Kruze JV, Bradley AJ, Zadoks RN, Dowson CG. Multilocus sequence typing of intercontinental bovine Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4737–4743. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4737-4743.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sol J, Sampimon OC, Barkema HW, Schukken YH. Factors associated with cure after therapy of clinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus . J Dairy Sci. 2000;83(2):278–284. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74875-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(9):2233–2239. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Waage S, Bjorland J, Caugant DA, Oppegaard H, Tollersrud T, Mrk T, Aarestrup FM. Spread of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to penicillin and tetracycline within and between dairy herds. Epidemiol Infect. 2002;129(1):193–202. doi: 10.1017/S095026880200715X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang B, Liu MC, Sheng JZ, Shen JZ. Resistance survey of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Hohhot. Chin J Vet Med. 2007;43(3):30–32. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 36.Weller TM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus typing methods: which should be the international standard? J Hosp Infect. 2000;44(3):160–172. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wilson DJ, Gonzalez RN, Das HH. Bovine mastitis pathogens in New York and Pennsylvania: prevalence and effects on somatic cell count and milk production. J Dairy Sci. 1997;80(10):2592–2598. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76215-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang XJ, Xu SL, Wu Y, Wu CJ. Prevalence of bovine subclinical mastitis in Jinhua. Chin J Anim Sci. 2005;41(12):37–38. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]