The substrate oxygenation reactions mediated by cytochrome P450 proteins comprise many key transformations in steroid biosynthesis and drug metabolism. Significant advances in heme-protein enzymology,1 the characterization of synthetic model compounds2 and computational approaches3 have pointed to a reactive oxoiron(IV)porphyrin π-radical-cation in the consensus mechanism. Compound I model compounds, such as the thoroughly characterized [OFeIVTMP+],4,5 have exhibited a full range of oxygen transfer reactions.6 However, the low kinetic reactivity of [OFeIVTMP+] has left unanswered just how the protein manages to generate a sufficiently reactive intermediate and what that reactive species is.7–10 We have shown that cationic oxomanganese(V) porphyrin complexes such as OMnV-4-TMPyP display very fast rates for oxygen transfer reactions in aqueous solution.11,12 Here we report the detection and kinetic characterization of [OFeIV-4-TMPyP+], which shows extraordinary rates for C-H hydroxylations.
The reaction of FeIII-4-TMPyP with mCPBA was analyzed by stopped-flow spectrophotometry, as we have previously described.11,13 As can be seen in the UV-Vis spectral time course (Figure 1), the starting iron(III) porphyrin spectrum (λmax 421 nm) was completely transformed within 20 ms into that of a new intermediate, 1, displaying a weak, blue-shifted Soret band at 402 nm and an absorbance at 673 nm, typical of a porphyrin π-radical-cation.4,14 Accordingly, we assign the [OFeIV-4-TMPyP+] formulation to 1. Global analysis afforded a second-order rate constant k1 = 1.59(±0.06)×107 M−1s−1 for the appearance of 1. In a slower, subsequent phase of the reaction (Scheme 1), 1 transformed into the well-characterized OFeIV-4-TMPyP (λmax 427 nm; k2=8.8(±0.1) s−1).15–17 Isosbestic points for the conversion of 1 to OFeIV-4-TMPyP were apparent at 413 and 570 nm. This transformation was more rapid at higher pH, in contrast to the behavior of the corresponding OMnV-4-TMPyP complex.11,18
Figure 1.

A. UV-vis transients observed upon mixing of 10 μM FeIII-4-TMPyP with 3 equiv mCPBA at pH 4.7, 10.0 °C. B. Data obtained at (a) 402 nm and (b) 427 nm and the superimposed global fit.
Scheme 1.
Kinetic partitioning of [OFeIV-4-TMPyP+] (1) between spontaneous decay to OFeIV-4-TMPyP (k2) and substrate hydroxylation (k3) resulting in the formation of FeIII-4-TMPyP.
Intermediate 1 was found to be very highly reactive toward C-H bond hydroxylations. Slow addition of mCPBA to a solution of 5 mM xanthene and 50 μM FeIII-4-TMPyP was monitored by 1H- and 13C-NMR. The major product, 9-xanthydrol (H-9, δ 5.75; C-9, 62 ppm), was formed in 90% yield, based on added oxidant (Figure S1). A small amount of xanthone was also formed. The FeIII catalyst was recovered with negligible decomposition. Significantly, when the oxidation was carried out in 47.5% 18OH2, ESI mass spectrometry of the product 9-xanthydrol indicated 21% 18O-incorporation (m/e 199/197 = 0.27). This partial exchange is consistent with an oxygen rebound reaction scenario with ~50% dilution of the 16O-peroxyacid-derived oxygen with 18Owater occupying the second axial ligation site.19,20 Xanthene:xanthene-d2 (1:1) revealed a modest kinetic isotope effect, kH/kD = 2.1 (m/e 197/198).
Since the oxidation of FeIII-4-TMPyP by mCPBA was so fast, we could conveniently monitor the kinetics of the reaction of 1 with xanthene using a single-mixing stopped-flow experiment (Figure 2A). Global analysis of the spectral data produced a rate constant k3 = 3.6(±0.3)×106 M−1s−1. A similar value was obtained by monitoring 673 nm (Figure 2A). Control experiments showed that OFeIV-4-TMPyP had negligible reactivity toward xanthene over this time course.
Figure 2.
A. Observed rate, kobs at 673 nm, vs. [xanthene] for its oxidation by 1 at pH 4.7, 14.5 °C; k3 = 2.8 (±.3)×106 M−1s−1. B. Correlation of k3 vs. C-H bond dissociation energy.
Reactions of fluorene-4-carboxylic acid, 4-isopropyl-, and 4-ethylbenzoic acid with 1 also gave very high rates for C-H hydroxylation with second-order rate constants of 1.80(±.06)×105 M−1s−1, 9.0(±.2)×103 M−1s−1 and 7.5(±.1)×103 M−1s−1, respectively. The corresponding alcohol products were formed in each case. These reaction rates are remarkably fast and, as can be seen in Figure 2B, the rates correlated well with the scissile C-H bond energy, indicating a homolytic hydrogen abstraction transition state.21 Reaction of 1 with bromide ion afforded hypobromite with k3=3.14 (±.04) × 105 M−1s−1.13
The results show that [OFeIV-4-TMPyP+] (1), which is accessed chemically from a peroxide precursor, is orders of magnitude more reactive than the well-studied tetramesityl analogs.4,6,7,9 By mapping the rate constants observed here for C-H bond cleavage by 1 onto the Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relationship21,22 for similar substrates (TOC graphic), the BDE of H-OFeIV-4-TMPyP can be estimated to be ~100 kcal/mol, much stronger than the values estimated for H-OFeIVTMP (92 kcal/mol)7 and H-OFeIIITPFPP (~86 kcal/mol).23 Indeed, 1 showed a rate constant for ethylbenzoic acid hydroxylation similar to that reported recently by Newcomb, et al. for ethyl benzene with CYP119 and chloroperoxidase compound I.24
The interesting question is why should synthetic OFeIV-porphyrin π-radical-cations have such high variability in their intrinsic reactivities. We have shown that electron-withdrawing meso-substituents dramatically decrease the reactivity of oxoMnV porphyrins.11 The effects have been traced to stabilization of the singlet d2 ground state with respect to the triplet and quintet manifolds, stabilization of the porphyrin HOMO and the unique centrosymmetric trans-dioxo ligand arrangement.25 Clearly, the situation for iron described here is markedly different. A relatively high redox potential for porphyrin ring oxidation is expected for FeIII-4-TMPyP. Further, efficient transmission of the electron deficit to the metal core is assured by the large orbital coefficients on the meso carbon and the pyrrole nitrogens in the a2u porphyrin HOMO. Indeed, the pKa of the axial water in diaquaFeIII-4-TMPyP is only 5.5 while the corresponding acidity of diaquaFeIIITMPS is 7.5.26 DFT calculations have shown that reaction barriers in oxo-transfer reactions may be lowered by decreasing the energy gaps to higher spin configurations for both manganese25,27 and iron.22,28 A decrease in the σ-donor properties of the coordinating pyrrole nitrogens due to the meso-substituent would be expected to decrease the energy level of the iron d(x2−y2) orbital. The high-spin state of an unsubstituted oxoFeIV porphyrin radical-cation, with the iron d(x2−y2) orbital singly occupied, has been calculated to be only 14 kcal/mol above the nearly degenerate doublet and quartet ground state structures.29 We suggest that the high kinetic reactivity observed here experimentally for [OFeIV-4-TMPyP+] (1) may result from both a low-lying a2u porphyrin HOMO and facilitated spin state crossing phenomena in the course of reaction. More generally, the results suggest that even subtle charge modulation at the heme active site of P450 to accomplish a similar tuning of state crossing energies or lower stability of the porphyrin π-radical-cation could result in high reactivity of a cytochrome P450 compound I.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Support of this research by the National Institutes of Health (R37-GM36298) and the National Science Foundation (CHE 0316301) is gratefully acknowledged.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and NMR data (S1). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org
References
- 1.Ortiz de Montellano PR, De Voss JJ. In: Cytochrome P450 Structure, Mechanism and Biochemistry. 3. Ortiz de Montellano PR, editor. Klewer Academic/Plenum; New York: 2005. pp. 183–245. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Groves JT. In: Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry. 3. Ortiz de Montellano PR, editor. Klewer Academic/Plenum; New York: 2005. pp. 1–44. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shaik S, Hirao H, Kumar D. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:532–542. doi: 10.1021/ar600042c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Groves JT, Haushalter RC, Nakamura M, Nemo TE, Evans BJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103:2884–2886. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abbreviations: TMP: 5,10,15,20-tetramesitylporphyrin; 4-TMPyP: 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methyl-4-pyridinium)porphyrin; mCPBA: metachloroperoxybenzoic acid; TMPS: 5,10,15,20-tetramesityl-octasulfonate.
- 6.Groves JT, Watanabe Y. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:8443–8452. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pan ZZ, Zhang R, Fung LWM, Newcomb M. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:1517–1519. doi: 10.1021/ic061972w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pan ZZ, Wang Q, Sheng X, Horner JH, Newcomb M. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2621–2628. doi: 10.1021/ja807847q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Franke A, Fertinger C, van Eldik R. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:5238–5242. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takahashi A, Kurahashi T, Fujii H. Inorg Chem. 2009;48:2614–2625. doi: 10.1021/ic802123m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jin N, Groves JT. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:2923–2924. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Groves JT, Lee JB, Marla SS. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:6269–6273. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lahaye D, Groves JT. J Inorg Biochem. 2007;101:1786–1797. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mandon D, Weiss R, Jayaraj K, Gold A, Terner J, Bill E, Trautwein AX. Inorg Chem. 1992;31:4404–4409. doi: 10.1021/ic951058v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee JB, Hunt JA, Groves JT. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:7493–7501. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bell SEJ, Cooke PR, Inchley P, Leanord DR, Smith JRL, Robbins A. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans. 2;1991:549–559. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen SM, Su YO. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1990:491–493. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jin N, Bourassa JL, Tizio SC, Groves JT. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2000;39:3849–3851. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20001103)39:21<3849::AID-ANIE3849>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bernadou J, Fabiano AS, Robert A, Meunier B. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:9375–9376. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jin N, Ibrahim M, Spiro TG, Groves JT. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:12416–12417. doi: 10.1021/ja0761737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mayer JM. Acc Chem Res. 1998;31:441–450. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shaik S, Kumar D, de Visser SP. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:10128–10140. doi: 10.1021/ja8019615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jeong YJ, Kang Y, Han AR, Lee YM, Kotani H, Fukuzumi S, Nam W. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:7321–7324. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sheng X, Horner JH, Newcomb M. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:13310–13320. doi: 10.1021/ja802652b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.De Angelis F, Jin N, Car R, Groves JT. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:4268–4276. doi: 10.1021/ic060306s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shimanovich R, Groves JT. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2001;387:307–317. doi: 10.1006/abbi.2000.2247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Balcells D, Raynaud C, Crabtree RH, Eisenstein O. Inorg Chem. 2008;47:10090–10099. doi: 10.1021/ic8013706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Altun A, Shaik S, Thiel W. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:8978–8987. doi: 10.1021/ja066847y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ogliaro F, de Visser SP, Groves JT, Shaik S. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:2874–2878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


