Skip to main content
AAPS PharmSci logoLink to AAPS PharmSci
. 2000 Jul 27;2(3):38–44. doi: 10.1208/ps020323

Recovery of human skin impedance in vivo after lontophoresis: Effect of metal ions

Catherine Curdy 1,2,3, Yogeshvar N Kalia 1,2,3, Richard H Guy 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC2761134  PMID: 11741239

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the counter-ion (cation) on the recovery of human skin impedance after iontophoresis in vivo. A series of metal chloride aqueous solutions (NaCl, KCl, CaCl2, and MgCl2) was investigated: first at the same concentration (133 mmol/L) and then at the same ionic strength as a NaCl solution at 133 mmol/L. The influence of hydration alone was also examined as a control. The recovery of human skin impedance was followed in the frequency range 1–1,000 Hz, over a 30-minute period after iontophoresis during which 3 impedance spectra were recorded. The results revealed that at t=30 minutes post-iontophoresis, skin impedance was approximately 3 times greater than the value immediately after the cessation of current passage. However, the results showed that the nature of the cation had no effect on recovery, regardless of whether the ions were at the same concentration or at an equivalent ionic strength. A simple parallel RC-equivalent circuit model for skin was used to determine the resistive (R) and capacitive (C) contributions to skin impedance. An analysis of variance on the calculated R and C values did not show any differences between the electrolytes used at the 2 different ionic strengths.

Footnotes

published July 27, 2000

Contributor Information

Catherine Curdy, Email: curdy@pharmal.cur-archamps.fr.

Yogeshvar N. Kalia, Email: kalia@pharmal.curarchamps.fr

Richard H. Guy, Phone: 33-0-3-50.31.50.21, FAX: 33-0-4-50.95.28.32, Email: rhg@pharma1.cur-archamps.fr

References

  • 1.Elias PM. Epidermal barrier function: intercellular lamellar lipid structures, origin, composition and metabolism. J Control Release. 1991;5:199–208. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(91)90111-P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lévêque JL, Ribaud CH, Grason JC. Caractérisation biophysique du stratum corneum. Relation entre sa structure et ses propriétés. Pathologie-Biologie. 1992;40:95–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burnette RR. Iontophoresis. In: Hadgraft J, Guy RH, editors. Transdermal Drug Delivery. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1989. pp. 247–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Green PG, Flanagan M, Shroot B, Guy RH. Iontophoretic drug delivery. In: Walters KA, Hadgraft J, editors. Pharmaceutieal Skin Penetration Enhancement. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1993. pp. 311–333. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Geest R, Elshove DAR, Danhof M, Lavrijsen APM, Boddé HE. Non-invasive assessment of skin barrier integrity and skin irritation following iontophoretic current application in humans. J Control Release. 1996;41:205–213. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(96)01329-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kalia YN, Merino V, Guy RH. Transdermal drug delivery. Clinical aspects. Dermatologic clinics. 1998;16:289–299. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8635(05)70011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burnette RR, Nuzzio JD. Impedance spectroscopy: applications to human skin. In: Potts RO, Guy RH, editors. Mechanism of Transdermal Drug Delivery. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker; 1997. pp. 215–230. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yamamoto T, Yamamoto Y. Electrical properties of the epidermal stratum corneum. Med Biol Eng. 1976;151–158. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Tregear RT. Physical Functions of the Skin. London and New York: Academic Press; 1966. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oh SY, Guy RH. Effect of iontophoresis on the electrical properties of human skin in vivo. Int J Pharm. 1995;124:137–142. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)00180-Q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kalia YN, Guy RH. The electrical characteristics of human skin in vivo. Pharm Res. 1995;12:1605–1613. doi: 10.1023/A:1016228730522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kalia YN, Nonato LB, Guy RH. The effects of iontophoresis on skin barrier integrity: non-invasive evaluation by impedance spectroscopy and transepidermal water loss. Pharm Res. 1996;13:957–960. doi: 10.1023/A:1016081902162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Turner NG, Kalia YN, Guy RH. The effect of current on skin barrier function in vivo recovery kinetics postiontophoresis. Pharm Res. 1997;14:1252–1257. doi: 10.1023/A:1012175428181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee SH, Elias PM, Feingold KR, Mauro T. A role for ions in barrier recovery after acute perturbation. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;102:976–979. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12384225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Burnette RR, Ongpipattanakul B. Characterization of the permselective properties of excised human skin during iontophoresis. J Pharm Sci. 1987;76:765–773. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600761003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.DeNuzzio JD, Berner B. Electrochemical and iontophoretic studies of human skin. J Control Release. 1990;11:105–112. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(90)90124-C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Burnette RR, Bagniefski TM. Influence of constant current iontophoresis on the impedance and passive Na+ permeabiility of excised nude mouse skin. J Pharm Sci. 1988;77:492–497. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600770606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oh SY, Leung L, Bommannan D, Guy RH, Potts RO. Effect of current, ionic strength and temperature on the electrical properties of the skin. J Control Release. 1993;27:115–125. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(93)90215-Q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AAPS PharmSci are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

RESOURCES