IMAGING NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORS WITH PET IN HUMAN SUBJECTS
There have been a number of attempts to study the nicotinic cholinergic system in the human brain and the only successful approaches have been for the α4β2 subtype of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), the main cerebral nAChR subtype. The first and perhaps the most straightforward approach was to study the active and less active isomers of [11C]nicotine [(−)-enantiomers (Fig. 1) and (+)-enantiomers, respectively].1 These were among the earliest PET tracers to be used in human beings because of the known toxicology of nicotine and their ease of radiolabeling. Several efforts have been made to quantify [11C](−)-nicotine and use the less active [11C](+)-nicotine to assist in measuring nonspecific binding. Measures of perfusion with [15O]water have also been used to aid in the quantification of nAChR binding.2 However, a number of investigators2–4 have concluded that, although specific binding could be measured, there were large changes in specific binding reflected by small changes in distribution volume and that neither the (−)- nor the (+)-[11C]nicotine were very suitable radiotracers.
Fig. 1.
The currently available nAChR PET radioligands for human studies.
In subsequent years, fluorinated derivatives of A-85380 labeled in both the 2 and the 6 position of the pyridine ring have been considered as promising radiotracers for imaging α4β2-nAChRs (see Fig. 1).
One of the most popular, 2-[18F]FA (see Figs 1 and 2, Table 1), has been shown to have a radiation effective dose of 39.6 mSv/MBq and radiation dose-equivalent value for the critical organ urinary bladder of 461 μSv/MBq.19 This allows at least two or more injections using typical state-of-the-art PET cameras and setting five Rem as the effective dose for an annual occupational limit. Toxicology studies with 2-FA typically show safety margins in excess of 1,000-fold with no change in blood pressure or heart rate.19 Unlike the very toxic epibatidine derivatives, which were initially considered for [18F] radiolabeling for human use and studied in primates,20–25 2-[18F]FA and the related derivative 6-[18F]FA have provided the field with radiopharmaceutics for multiple brain applications that have acceptable toxicity and low radiation risk.
Fig. 2.
2-[18F]FA and its new analogs with improved imaging properties. aHigh accumulation of radioactivity in striatum suggests the presence of active radiolabeled metabolites.
Table 1.
PET Imaging of nAChR in human subjects
| PET/SPECT Radiotracer | Number of Patients | Single Scan or Dynamic | Arterial Line | Bolus or Continuous Infusion | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−)- [11C] nicotine | 5 subjects | Dynamic: baseline and challenge | Yes | Bolus | 3 |
| 2- [18F]FA | 6 healthy controls | Single whole-body scan and dynamic brain scan | No | Bolus | 5 |
| 2- [18F]FA | 3 healthy controls | Single whole-body scan | No | Bolus | 6 |
| 2- [18F]FA | 7 healthy controls | Dynamic | Yes | Bolus | 7,8 |
| 2- [18F]FA | 8; 4 of which were smokers | Dynamic | Yes | Bolus plus infusion | 9 |
| 2- [18F]FA | 97 (12 healthy controls) | Single | Yes | Bolus | 10 |
| 2- [18F]FA | 15 AD patients; 14 age-matched controls | Single scan | No | Slow intravenous bolus injection | 11,12 |
| 2-FA | 10 normal volunteers | Dynamic | Yes | Bolus | 13 |
| 2- [18F]FA; [18F]FDG | 8 nonsmoking ADNFLE patients; 7 age-matched controls. 5 patients underwent additional FDG PET experiment | Dynamic | No | Bolus | 14 |
| 2- [18F]FA | 17 AD patients; 6 w/amnestic MCI; 10 normal aged healthy controls | Dynamic | Yes | Bolus | 15 |
| 2- [18F]FA | 7 smokers; 7 nonsmokers | Dynamic | Yes | Continuous infusion | 16 |
| 6- [18F]FA | 5 nonsmokers | Dynamic (2-hour scan) 4-hour study | Yes | Bolus | 17 |
| 5- [123I]IA | 6 nonsmokers, 6 light smokers | Dynamic | Yes | Bolus and continuous infusion | 18 |
Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ADNFLE, autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy; FDG, [18F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography.
2-[18F]FA is not entirely ideal because it does not reach a steady state for several hours after injection, but it can be quantified by number of procedures in the human brain. Some of these have included dynamic PET scans over 2 hours followed by repeat scans an hour later. With arterial sampling and compartmental modeling, this technique has provided quantifiable measures of distribution volume that is regionally specific and stable in the brain.7,8 Bolus injection studies have employed a scanning time of only 140 minutes and two-tissue compartmental models but do require arterial blood sampling. Other methods, such as those employed by Brody and colleagues26 and Kimes and colleagues9 have performed 2-[18F]FA studies using bolus-plus-infusion methods with a duration of 6 to 8 hours (Kbolus = 500 minutes). Similarly, both bolus and continuous infusion methods have been performed with the single-photon emission computed tomography nAChR radioligand 5-[123I]IA.18,27
A number of attempts have been made to simplify the 2-[18F]FA studies. For example, a simplified distribution volume determined by the ratio of the tissue to the metabolite corrected plasma and using a single 90- to 120-minute PET acquisition appeared to correlate reasonably well with graphical methods and two compartmental models in cortical regions. Lower correlations were found in regions with higher binding of nicotinic cholinergic receptors, such as the thalamus. This lower correlation in higher binding regions is not unexpected because the time to achieve steady-state conditions is even slower than in the lower binding regions.13
In addition to the extensive use 2-[18F]FA, there is increasing interest in derivatives such as 6-[18F]FA.28 Based on nonhuman primate studies, some centers believe that 6-[18F]FA shows more reversible kinetics and higher specific binding than 2-[18F]FA.29 The initial studies with 6-[18F]FA17 in five human subjects suggested some reversibility in various brain regions, with the radiotracer peaking at 1 to 2 hours in the thalamus. The half-life for clearance was about 4 hours. Cortical binding peaked early in less than 60 minutes, but there was lower—but persistent—uptake in white matter. Retest studies ranged from as low as 0.5% to as high as 14% in various brain regions. Relatively high toxicity of 6-FA is an obstacle for more wide use of 6-[18F]FA as a PET radioligand for human studies.30
Given the success with both 2-[18F]FA and 6-[18F]FA, a number of successful applications have been performed. Among the first, not surprisingly, were studies of cigarette smokers. For example, a recent study26 demonstrated that there was a dose-dependent effect of smoking from one puff, to three puffs, to a full cigarette or to satiety (around ~3 cigarettes), demonstrating a dose-dependent occupancy in nAChR-rich regions. Most importantly, it suggested that one to two puffs of the cigarette resulted in 15% occupancy for more than 3 hours after smoking. A full cigarette resulted in greater than 88% occupancy, and the investigators concluded that daily smoking results in near complete occupancy of nAChRs, suggesting that tobacco-dependent smokers maintain almost full occupancy throughout the day.
Another example of an application in patients includes 2-[18F]FA PET images of medial frontal-lobe epilepsy demonstrating a significant increase in the distribution volume in the mesencephalon, pons, and cerebellum when compared with controls. This, together with FDG measurements, suggested that the mesencephalon might be related to arousal.14
Because of the importance of nicotine and memory, and the known α4β2 abnormalities seen in postmortem studies, 2-[18F]FA studies have been explored in Alzheimer’s disease.11,12,15 One example11,12 was unable to demonstrate loss of nAChRs in vivo in early Alzheimer’s disease, in spite of the fact that these patients showed significant cognitive impairment. Although this could be related to the sensitivity of the technique, it could also illustrate the ability of the technique to separate a lack of change in spite of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease patients versus controls. This is in contrast to postmortem studies, where the decline was always demonstrated, but perhaps at a later stage in the disease. Other studies, such as those of patients with mild dementia and mild cognitive impairment, demonstrate a reduction of nAChRs in some subjects with early Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment, as expected. There was considerable overlap of the extent of binding between patients with mild cognitive impairment and controls. Some investigators have even suggested (albeit without definitive evidence) that 2- [18F]FA might have a predictive potential in patients with mild cognitive impairment at risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease. The evidence for this is not yet available, however.
Studies investigating 2-[18F]FA continue, with attempts being made to improve the measurements of metabolites. A recent study10 showed that solid-phase extraction methods are less time consuming than high-performance liquid chromatography and might be more suitable for 2-[18F]FA measurements during long PET investigations.
THE NEED FOR NEW NACHR RADIOLIGANDS FOR THALAMIC AND EXTRATHALAMIC BINDING
There are two main considerations for the need for new tracers beyond 2-[18F]FA and 6-[18F]FA. First, the widest used nicotinic cholinergic radiotracer at present, 2-[18F]FA, which has a reasonable binding potential value of approximately 2 in the thalamus, displays the highest binding region for α4β2-nAChRs, but below 1 for cortical and subcortical regions. This quantification would be further compromised in the absence of up-regulation of the nicotinic cholinergic system by smoking or a reduction in binding in a neurodegenerative disorder, such as Alzheimer’s disease.
A further problem is the kinetics of the radiotracer in cortical, subcortical (striatal), and thalamic brain areas. For example, with 2-[18F]FA the radiotracer reaches steady state either with a bolus or definitively with constant-infusion methods. However, in the thalamic areas, which are of considerable interest in some disorders, including smoking, there is a need for long infusions. Sometimes it takes up to 6 or 8 hours to reach the steady state, and bolus-injection studies—while performed for as little as 2 to 3 hours—are not ideal and undoubtedly include compromises in the mathematical modeling of the thalamic regions.
New radiotracers to study the thalamus are needed that are more reversible during reasonable PET scan times, such as 90 minutes to 2 hours. Similarly, in the cortical region, higher binding potentials are needed even if they reach a steady state during this time. Examples of some approaches include radiotracers such as [18F]NIDA522131, which was designed to image extra thalamic regions.31,32 In comparisons, this radiotracer had higher in vitro affinity and increased uptake with greater distribution volumes than 2-[18F]FA, especially in extra thalamic areas. The increase in brain binding of [18F]NIDA522131 was about four times greater than 2-[18F]FA in multiple brain regions, including the cingulate cortex, frontal cortex, thalamus, mid-brain and, to a less extent, putamen. However, [18F]NIDA522131 exhibits evidence for even less-reversible binding than that of 2-[18F]FA and requires more than 6 hours of scanning.
It has been hypothesized20 that some of the slow entry into the brain of radiotracers, such as 2-[18F]FA or 6-[18F]FA, may be related to lipophicity, affinity, and possibly a slow-off rate. It was documented that although peak activity may occur between 80 and 100 minutes in the brain with 2-[18F]FA, there was still a slow approach to steady state (tissue plasma ratios). Five hours after injection, a steady state still was not reached in the thalamus. Similarly, 6-[18F]FA required at least 4 hours of scanning time and 5-[123I]IA at least 4 hours. All suffer from failure to achieve a steady state in various brain regions of interest.
It has been proposed20 that two classes of radiotracers for nAChR are needed. These would include one group with relatively rapid brain kinetics to allow facile quantitation in the brain regions with the highest binding, such as the thalamus. A second group would require high binding in extra thalamic regions, presumably by using higher affinity radioligands. This latter group would be unlikely to reach a steady state in higher binding regions, but would be more useful in regions such as the cortex. The radiopharmaceutics in the second group would be used for studies of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, where cortical changes are most important. The radiopharmaceutics in the first group would have higher binding in the thalamus and might play an important role in nicotine addiction.
PET NACHR RADIOLIGANDS WITH OPTIMIZED BRAIN KINETICS
Development of nAChR PET radioligands has a long history and it has been reviewed in several publications.20–25,33,34 In summary, at the moment [11C]nicotine, 2-[18F]FA, and 6-[18F]FA are the only available radioligands for imaging of nAChRs in human subjects. [11C]Nicotine is not a very suitable radioligand for PET quantification of nAChRs because of its low specific and high nonspecific binding and its very rapid metabolism. The slow brain kinetics of 2-[18F]FA and 6-[18F]FA lead to lengthy and expensive imaging studies that cannot be tolerated by patients and afforded by most PET centers. In addition, 2-[18F]FA and 6-[18F]FA exhibit relatively low binding potential values in animal and human brains.
The drawbacks of existing nAChR radioligands hamper the PET imaging research of α4β2-nAChR, the major class of cerebral receptors that is directly linked to various central nervous system (CNS) disorders. On the other hand, these drawbacks are the driving force of development of better PET radioligands for imaging nAChRs. The aim of these recent studies is to synthesize radioligands with an adequately high binding-potential value (BPThalamus ≥ 2) that is normally considered a minimum requirement for quantitative PET studies. Most importantly, the expected radioligands have to rapidly reach a steady state in various brain regions and require a scanning time of less than or equal to 2 hours, which is regarded as the most practical time for human application.
The development of nAChR radioligands that are superior to 2-[18F]FA was based on the idea that the binding affinity (Ki) and lipophilicity (logD) values are the two major factors that affect the brain kinetics and binding potentials of in vivo CNS nAChR radioligands. The most interesting results in the last few years involved the radiolabeled analogs of (i) A-84,543/A-85,380, high-affinity nAChR ligands that have been synthesized by Abbott Laboratories35 and (ii) epibatidine, a very high affinity nAChR agonist that was discovered by National Institutes of Health scientists in Ecuadorian frogs (Fig. 3).36
Fig. 3.
Lead compounds for the recent development of nAChR radioligands.
Radiolabeled Analogs of A-84,543 and A-85,380
Structurally similar pyridyl ethers A-84,543 and A-85,380 were attractive leads for discovery of new nAChR radioligands because these leads exhibit high binding affinity and excellent α4β2-nAChR subtype selectivity. 2-[18F]FA and 6-[18F]FA (see Fig. 1), the only available nAChR radioligands that are approved for human studies, are derivatives of A-84,543 and A-85,380, suggesting that new analogs of these leads will be sufficiently safe for human application.
[11C]Me-PVC
(S,E)-2-chloro-5-((1-[11C]methylpyrrolidin-2-yl)methoxy)-3-(2-(pyridin-4-yl)vinyl)pyridine ([11C]Me-PVC) (see Fig. 2)37–39 was one of the first attempts to resolve the issue of the slow brain kinetics of 2-[18F]FA, which were thought to be because of its high polarity. [11C]Me-PVC exhibits substantially greater lipophilicity than 2-[18F]FA and was expected to display better blood-brain barrier permeability. Because of the high binding affinity of [11C]Me-PVC, this radioligand specifically labels nAChRs in vivo with a reasonable binding-potential value. In the Rhesus monkey, the brain kinetics of [11C]Me-PVC are optimally reversible (see Fig. 2). After a bolus injection of [11C]Me-PVC, only 90 to 120 minutes of scanning is necessary to obtain quantifiable PET data in a Rhesus monkey.39 Despite the promising results in animals, [11C]Me-PVC has never been used in human subjects because its binding potential value is slightly lower than that of 2-[18F]FA and the authors have chosen to hunt for a radioligand with equally optimal brain kinetics but greater binding potential.
[11C]JHU85208, [11C]JHU85157 and [11C]JHU85270
As an attempt to overcome the problem of the low binding-potential value of [11C]Me-PVC, three analogs of this compound ([11C]JHU85208, [11C]JHU85157, and [11C]JHU85270) (see Fig. 2) have been synthesized.40,41 All three have better binding affinity and slightly lower lipophilicity than [11C]Me-PVC. All three radioligands demonstrated excellent imaging properties in rodents with high accumulation of radioactivity in the nAChR-rich thalamus, moderate uptake in the cortex, a region with a medium density of nAChRs, and lowest uptake in the nAChR-poor cerebellum (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Small animal PET image (summed 20–90 minutes) of [11C]JHU85157 in the rat brain. Courtesy of C.J. Endres, PhD, Baltimore, MD.
Inspired by the successful rodent imaging results, the Johns Hopkins group studied these three radioligands, [11C]JHU85208, [11C]JHU85157, and [11C]JHU85270 in baboons.40 The kinetics of the radioligands in the baboon brain were reversible (see Fig. 2) and only 2 hours were required for the radioligands to reach a steady state in the baboon thalamus. Unexpectedly, the thalamic binding potentials of [11C]JHU85208, [11C]JHU85157, and [11C]JHU85270 were lower than that of 2-[18F]FA (0.7–0.8 versus 2). Metabolite analysis of [11C]JHU85208, [11C]JHU85157, and [11C]JHU85270 demonstrated that, like their analog [11C](−)nicotine that metabolizes to lipophilic [11C]cotinine, in baboon plasma all three 11C-radioligands generated oxidative lipophilic metabolites that are likely to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and increase nonspecific binding. Because the binding-potential values are relatively low there are no current plans to pursue[11C]JHU85208, [11C]JHU85157, and [11C]JHU85270 as radioligands for human imaging.
[18F]Nifene
The development of 3-((2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)methoxy)-2- [18F]fluoropyridine ([18F]nifene)42,43 was justified by the hypothesis that an analog of 2-[18F]FA with slightly reduced binding affinity might display more rapid brain kinetics. The binding affinity of [18F]nifene is lower than that of 2-[18F]FA (see Fig. 2). As was expected, the brain kinetics of [18F]nifene in the Rhesus monkey brain is highly reversible (see Fig. 2). Unfortunately, the moderate thalamus/cerebellum ratio value of 2.2 of [18F]nifene in monkey is the price paid for the rapid brain kinetics of this radioligand with relatively low binding affinity. The authors are not aware of any further in vivo studies with [18F]nifene in animals or human subjects.
[18F]- and [11CH3]-(S)-3-(6-fluorohex-1-ynyl)-5-((1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl)methoxy) pyridines
The title isotopomer-radioligands (see Fig. 2) was a part of a medicinal chemistry project directed toward the synthesis of ligands with high β2/β4-nAChR subtype selectivity (Kiα4β2 = 0.95 nM, Kiα3β4 = 88,000 nM).44 In baboon PET imaging studies, the radioligands45 specifically labeled nAChRs in the nAChR-rich thalamus with optimally reversible brain kinetics (see Fig. 2). The thalamus/cerebellum ratio reached a value of 2.5 at 1 hour after injection. It is unlikely that [18F]- or [11CH3]-(S)-3-(6-fluorohex-1-ynyl)-5-((1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl)methoxy)pyridines will be useful for α4β2-subtype nAChR imaging because both radioligands manifested high uptake of radioactivity in the nAChR-poor striatum. After injection of the radioligands into baboons, the uptake of the radioactivity in the striatum was not diminished by injection of nicotine. This observation suggests that striatum binding is not mediated by nAChRs and can be explained by the appearance of radiolabeled metabolites that are ligands of another CNS receptor.
Radiolabeled Analogs of Epibatidine
Epibatidine is a very high affinity agonist of nAChRs that exhibits little nAChR-subtype selectivity and is notorious for its acute toxicity. In the past, many PET-labeled epibatidine analogs have been developed (see for review20). Several of these compounds exhibited excellent imaging properties but they were too toxic for human application. The recent success in the development of radiolabeled analogs of epibatidine for PET imaging of nAChRs is largely indebted to the discovery of derivatives of epibatidine analogs with properties of antagonists of nAChR.46,47 This discovery initiated a series of research studies by several groups that are described below.
(±)- [11C]NMI-EPB
The synthesis of 7-methyl-2-exo-(3′-iodo-5′-pyridinyl)-7-azabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane ((±)-NMI-EPB) was first published by Carroll and colleagues.47 Unlike many other epibatidine analogs that are highly toxic nAChR agonists, (±)-NMI-EPB with a bulky substituent in position 5 of the pyridine ring is a nAChR antagonist with high binding affinity47 (Fig. 5). Being a nAChR antagonist, (±)-NMI-EPB should not be as toxic as epibatidine. It was expected that (±)-NMI-EPB would be sufficiently safe for in vivo experiments. Thus, in the functional in vivo studies47 up to 0.8 mg/kg (1,250 nmol/kg –2500 nmol/kg) of (±)-NMI-EPB was injected into mice. In further experiments the same group radiolabeled (±)-NMI-EPB with 11C and [11C](±)-NMI-EPB has been studied by PET in baboon.48 The radioligand specifically labeled nAChRs in the baboon brain with a very good ratio of specific/nonspecific binding (see Fig. 5). Because the time-uptake curves in the baboon brain regions exhibit a 5-minute peak, it was reasonable to hypothesize that [11C](±)-NMI-EPB might manifest rapid brain equilibrium and that the radioligand would potentially be more advantageous than 2-[18F]FA and 6-[18F]FA.
Fig. 5.
PET imaging properties of new radiolabeled analogs of epibatidine. aBaboon; bPiglets; cLipophilicity value (logarithm of partition coefficient between n-octanol and water at pH 7.4); dInhibition binding affinity. Cx = cortex, Th = thalamus.
The binding affinity of enantiomers of N-methylepibatidine manifests little enantioselectivity,49 but the analogs of N-methylepibatidine with large substituents in the pyridine ring are highly enantioselective.50 Therefore, one could anticipate that (−)- and (+)-enantiomers of (±)-NMI-EPB should be enantioselective and a more potent enantiomer of 11C-NMI-EPB might exhibit better PET imaging properties than those of [11C](±)-NMI-EPB. Preparation of (+)-NMI-EPB and (−)-NMI-EPB was reported and the binding affinity of (−)-NMI-EPB was 30 times greater than that of (+)-NMI-EPB.51 A rodent study with [11C](−)-NMI-EPB has confirmed that the radioligand labels cerebral nAChRs with a high level of specificity.51 Unfortunately, the baseline baboon PET imaging showed that [11C](−)-NMI-EPB does not reach a steady state in the thalamus within 90 minutes after administration and its kinetics are too slow for a 11C-radioligand with a 20-minute half-life. The previously described rapid brain kinetics of [11C](±)-NMI-EPB are likely to correspond to the superimposition of the slow kinetics of [11C](−)-NMI-EPB and very fast nonspecific uptake of less active [11C](+)-NMI-EPB. Therefore, the authors of the article suggested that neither [11C](−)-NMI-EPB nor [11C](±)-NMI-EPB are suitable for quantitative human PET imaging.51
[18F]FPhEP and [18F]F2PhEP
Two more α4β2-nAChR selective52 epibatidine analogs from Carroll and colleagues,53 2-(6-fluoro-5-phenylpyridin-3-yl)-7-aza-bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, FPhEP (Ki = 240 PM) and 2-(6-fluoro-5-(4-fluoro-phenyl)pyridin-3-yl)-7-aza-bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, F2PhEP (Ki = 29 PM) (see Fig. 5) were of interest for PET.52,54,55 The researchers from Orsay radiolabeled both compounds with 18F and studied [18F]FPhEP and [18F]F2PhEP in baboons.54,55 Both radioligands readily penetrated the blood-brain barrier, showing more rapid brain kinetics than those of 2-[18F]FA. As evidence of the specific in vivo binding of [18F]FPhEP in the baboon brain, its uptake was blocked by injection of nicotinic ligands. Unfortunately, the binding-potential value of [18F]FPhEP (see Fig. 5) was too low for further investment in this radioligand.
The binding affinity of F2PhEP is one order of magnitude greater than that of FPhEP, but [18F]F2PhEP has thalamic uptake that is lower than of [18F]FPhEP.54,55 In contrast, the shape of the time-activity curves in different brain regions reflected the affinity of the ligands. [18F]FPhEP displayed similar time-activity curves in all regions of interest (except white matter), whether or not the region is receptor rich or poor, whereas for [18F]F2PhEP uptake was substantially greater in the thalamus than in the cerebellum. Surprisingly, the uptake of [18F]F2PhEP in the cortex, the region with substantial density of nAChRs, was lower than uptake in the nAChR-poor cerebellum. The radioligand [18F]F2PhEP also presented another surprise in the blocking studies when it did not show a significant reduction of radioactivity accumulation after injection of nicotine. The authors of the article54 concluded that the radiotracers did not fulfill the widely adopted criteria for a quality PET radioligand. It is likely that both radioligands are too lipophilic (see Fig. 5) and their nonspecific binding is too high for a successful radioligand.
[18F](−)NCFHEB
Enantiomers of the radiofluorinated homolog of epibatidine, 6-(6- [18F]fluoropyridin-3-yl)-8-aza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane, (see Fig. 5), (−)- [18F]NCFHEB, and (+)-NCFHEB were reported in several recent publications.56–58 Both compounds display high α4β2-nAChR and low α3β4-nAChR in vitro binding affinity and excellent specific radiolabeling of nAChRs in mice.56 The same group performed a substantial number of PET studies and compared the porcine brain kinetics of (−)-[18F]NCFHEB and (+)-NCFHEB with 2-[18F]FA to evaluate the potential of the new radioligands for human neuroimaging. Several animals received an additional intravenous injection of the nAChR agonist A81418 to confirm the specific binding of the radioligands. Both enantiomers of [18F]NCFHEB showed a higher brain uptake and better binding-potential values than 2-[18F]FA (see Fig. 5). In the piglet thalamus (+)-[18F]NCFHEB, (−)-[18F]NCFHEB and 2-[18F]FA manifest a peak uptake at 142 minutes, 80 minutes, and 68 minutes, correspondingly, suggesting relatively slow brain kinetics of the new radioligands. Interestingly, the thalamus/olfactory bulb ratio had reached its peak for (−)-[18F]NCFHEB earlier than for 2-[18F]FA. This observation led the investigators to the opinion that the equilibrium of specific binding of (−)-[18F]NCFHEB was reached earlier than that of 2-[18F]FA and, therefore, PET imaging properties of (−)-[18F]NCFHEB may be potentially superior to 2-[18F]FA. The authors look forward to further development of (−)-[18F]NCFHEB for PET imaging of nAChRs in nonhuman primates and, perhaps, in human subjects.
Development of [18F]AZAN ([18F]JHU87522)
High demand for a better radioligand for imagingα4β2-nAChRs inspired the authors group to exert a major synthetic effort to develop a nicotinic-receptor ligand with optimized imaging properties. As the result of these studies, an 18F-labeled nAChR antagonist (−)-2-(6- [18F]fluoro-2,3′-bipyridin-5′-yl)-7-methyl-7-aza-bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane ([18F]JHU87522 or [18F]AZAN) was obtained that showed evidence of better PET imaging properties than 2-[18F]FA. These properties include brain kinetics that require only 1.5 hours of data acquisition after bolus administration, good binding-potential values (2.5–4), very high total brain uptake, absence of lipophilic metabolites, a good safety profile, and simple radiosynthesis, with more details shown below.
The preliminary studies50 suggested that 18F-radiolabeled derivatives of dipyridyl analogs of epibatidine show excellent potential for PET. The structure-activity relationship studies demonstrated that the high binding-affinity value of dipyridyl analogs of epibatidine can be optimized within the subnanomolar range by modification of substituents in the external pyridine ring, and by the change of the connecting position of the ring. Because of this, the authors had a large degree of freedom in optimization of binding affinity and lipophilicity. The authors were convinced that the best preliminary radioligand, [18F](−)-JHU86358, which displayed very high binding affinity and binding potential but relatively slow brain kinetics, could be optimized toward a compound with faster brain kinetics and a sufficient binding potential value if the binding affinity was slightly reduced. Three additional isomers of [18F](−)-JHU86358, namely [18F](−)-JHU86430, [18F](−)-JHU86428, and [18F](−)-JHU87522 with similar physical-chemical properties but reduced binding affinities (see Fig. 5) have been synthesized. [18F](−)-JHU86430 exhibited almost the same Ki value as that of [18F](−)-JHU86358 and both radioligands showed comparable PET imaging properties.
The next isomer, [18F](−)-JHU86428 ((−)-2-(2′-[18F]fluoro-3,3′-bipyridin-5-yl)-7-methyl-7-aza-bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, [18F]XTRA) with slightly reduced binding affinity (see Fig. 5), peaked in the baboon thalamus at 75 minutes after injection. This compound had excellent binding-potential values and required about 2.5 hours scanning in thalamus and 1.5 hours scanning in the cortex after bolus injection.59 [18F]XTRA holds promise for imaging extrathalamic nAChRs in human beings.
The isomer [18F](−)-JHU8752259 ((−)-2-(6-[18F]fluoro-2,3′-bipyridin-5′-yl)-7-methyl-7-aza-bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, [18F]AZAN) had the lowest binding affinity within the series (see Fig. 5) and gave the most interesting results in baseline and blockade baboon PET studies. The radioligand requires only 90 minutes of scanning to reach a steady state. In addition to the rapid brain kinetics, [18F]AZAN displays a higher binding-potential value than 2-FA. [18F]AZAN also exhibits a 200% greater total brain uptake than 2-[18F]FA and an absence of lipophilic metabolites. The radiosynthesis of [18F]AZAN is a one-step radiolabeling that is simpler than the two-step radiosynthesis of 2-[18F]FA.
The inhibition binding assay studies with various nAChR subtypes demonstrated that AZAN is a highly selective α4β2-nAChR ligand, whereas a functional assay in vitro showed that AZAN exhibits properties of a potent antagonist of the α4β2-nAChR subtype. Preliminary behavioral toxicologic studies in mice demonstrated that AZAN exhibits acute toxicity comparable to that of 2-FA.59 Radiation dosimetry and toxicology studies with AZAN will establish whether or not [18F]AZAN is safe for PET imaging in human beings.
SUMMARY
PET imaging of α4β2-nAChRs in human subjects is a vibrant field of contemporary neuroscience and nuclear medicine. Nicotinic imaging studies in smoking, epilepsy, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, schizophrenia, cognition, behavior, memory, and in research of aging, cognitive impairments, and dementia attract the attention of many researchers. The nAChR radioligands that are currently available for PET manifest slow brain kinetics and low binding potentials that prevent widespread use of PET imaging research of nAChR in human beings.
To address the problems with existing PET radioligands for imaging of nAChRs, especially the most common one 2-[18F]FA, several research groups have worked to develop novel compounds with improved brain kinetics. One new compound is (−)-[18F]NCFHEB, which demonstrated PET imaging properties that are superior to 2- [18F]FA in pigs. Further experiments with this radioligand that include PET imaging in nonhuman primates and safety studies are needed to qualify (−)-[18F]NCFHEB as a potential candidate for human imaging.
The most recent candidate, radioligand [18F](−)-JHU87522 ([18F]AZAN), exhibited all the necessary properties that are required for a successful PET radiotracer for imaging of nAChRs.59 [18F]AZAN specifically labels cerebral nAChRs with high binding potential and its brain uptake is substantially greater than that of 2-[18F]FA. Most importantly, [18F]AZAN requires only 90 to 100 minutes of PET scanning to obtain quantifiable receptor data. In addition, [18F]AZAN is a β2-subtype selective nAChR antagonist with low acute side effects in animals. The radiosynthesis of [18F]AZAN is simpler than that of 2-[18F]FA. All of these properties suggest that [18F]AZAN is a substantially better radioligand than 2-[18F]FA, the most popular radioligand for PET imaging of nAChRs in the human brain. The safety studies currently being performed with [18F]AZAN will determine whether [18F]AZAN can replace 2-[18F]FA in the PET clinic.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants MH079017 and DA020777 and by the Division of Nuclear Medicine of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
We thank Mrs. Judy Buchanan for editorial help.
References
- 1.Nordberg A, Hartvig P, Lundqvist H, et al. Uptake and regional distribution of (+)-(R)- and (−)-(S)-N-[methyl-11C]-nicotine in the brains of rhesus monkey. An attempt to study nicotinic receptors in vivo. J Neural Transm Park Dis Dement Sect. 1989;1(3):195–205. doi: 10.1007/BF02248669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lundqvist H, Nordberg A, Hartvig P, et al. (S)-(−)-[11C]nicotine binding assessed by PET: a dual tracer model evaluated in the rhesus monkey brain. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1998;12(3):238–46. doi: 10.1097/00002093-199809000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Muzic RF, Jr, Berridge MS, Friedland RP, et al. PET quantification of specific binding of carbon-11-nicotine in human brain. J Nucl Med. 1998;39(12):2048–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Grunwald F, Biersack HJ, Kuschinsky W. Nicotine receptor mapping. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23(8):1012–4. doi: 10.1007/BF01084381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kimes AS, Horti AG, London ED, et al. 2-[18F]F-A85380: PET imaging of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and whole body distribution in humans. FASEB J. 2003;17(10):1331–3. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0492fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bottlaender M, Valette H, Roumenov D, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 18F-fluoro-A-85380 in healthy volunteers. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(4):596–601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gallezot JD, Bottlaender MA, Delforge J, et al. Quantification of cerebral nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by PET using 2-[(18)F]fluoro-A-85380 and the multiinjection approach. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;28:172–89. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gallezot JD, Bottlaender M, Gregoire MC, et al. In vivo imaging of human cerebral nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with 2-18F-fluoro-A-85380 and PET. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(2):240–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kimes AS, Chefer SI, Matochik JA, et al. Quantification of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the human brain with PET: bolus plus infusion administration of 2-[18F]F-A85380. Neuroimage. 2008;39(2):717–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sorger D, Becker GA, Patt M, et al. Measurement of the alpha4beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligand 2-[(18)F]Fluoro-A-85380 and its metabolites in human blood during PET investigation: a methodological study. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34(3):331–42. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ellis JR, Nathan PJ, Villemagne VL, et al. Galant-amine-induced improvements in cognitive function are not related to alterations in alpha(4)beta(2) nicotinic receptors in early Alzheimer’s disease as measured in vivo by 2-[(18)F]Fluoro-A-85380 PET. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2009 Jan;202(1–3):79–91. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1347-9. Epub 2008 Oct 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ellis JR, Villemagne VL, Nathan PJ, et al. Relationship between nicotinic receptors and cognitive function in early Alzheimer’s disease: a 2-[18F]fluoro-A-85380 PET study. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008;90(2):404–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mitkovski S, Villemagne VL, Novakovic KE, et al. Simplified quantification of nicotinic receptors with 2[18F]F-A-85380 PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32(6):585–91. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Picard F, Bruel D, Servent D, et al. Alteration of the in vivo nicotinic receptor density in ADNFLE patients: a PET study. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 8):2047–60. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sabri O, Kendziorra K, Wolf H, et al. Acetylcholine receptors in dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35(Suppl 1):S30–45. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0701-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wullner U, Gundisch D, Herzog H, et al. Smoking upregulates alpha4beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the human brain. Neurosci Lett. 2008;430(1):34–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ding YS, Fowler JS, Logan J, et al. 6-[18F]Fluoro-A-85380, a new PET tracer for the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: studies in the human brain and in vivo demonstration of specific binding in white matter. Synapse. 2004;53(3):184–9. doi: 10.1002/syn.20051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brasic JR, Zhou Y, Musachio JL, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography experience with (S)-5-[(123)I]iodo-3-(2-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine in the living human brain of smokers and nonsmokers. Synapse. 2009;63(4):339–58. doi: 10.1002/syn.20611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vaupel DB, Tella SR, Huso DL, et al. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of 2-fluoro-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine (2-F-A-85380), a ligand for imaging cerebral nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with positron emission tomography. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;312(1):355–65. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.073999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Horti AG, Villemagne VL. The quest for Eldorado: development of radioligands for in vivo imaging of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human brain. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12(30):3877–900. doi: 10.2174/138161206778559605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gundisch D. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and imaging. Curr Pharm Des. 2000;6(11):1143–57. doi: 10.2174/1381612003399879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sihver W, Langstrom B, Nordberg A. Ligands for in vivo imaging of nicotinic receptor subtypes in Alzheimer brain. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2000;176:27–33. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2000.00304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sihver W, Nordberg A, Langstrom B, et al. Development of ligands for in vivo imaging of cerebral nicotinic receptors. Behav Brain Res. 2000;113(1–2):143–57. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00209-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Volkow ND, Ding YS, Fowler JS, et al. Imaging brain cholinergic activity with positron emission tomography: its role in the evaluation of cholinergic treatments in Alzheimer’s dementia. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;49(3):211–20. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ding YS, Fowler J. New-generation radiotracers for nAChR and NET. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32(7):707–18. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, et al. Cigarette smoking saturates brain alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(8):907–15. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fujita M, Al-Tikriti MS, Tamagnan G, et al. Influence of acetylcholine levels on the binding of a SPECT nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligand [123I]5-I-A-85380. Synapse. 2003;48(3):116–22. doi: 10.1002/syn.10194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Horti AG, Chefer SI, Mukhin AG, et al. 6-[18F]fluoro-A-85380, a novel radioligand for in vivo imaging of central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Life Sci. 2000;67(4):463–9. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(00)00635-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ding YS, Liu N, Wang T, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 6-[18F]fluoro-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine as a PET tracer for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nucl Med Biol. 2000;27(4):381–9. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(00)00094-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Scheffel U, Horti AG, Koren AO, et al. 6-[18F]Fluoro-A-85380: an in vivo tracer for the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Nucl Med Biol. 2000;27(1):51–6. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(99)00082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chefer SI, Pavlova OA, Zhang Y, et al. NIDA522131, a new radioligand for imaging extrathalamic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Neurochem. 2008;104:306–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang Y, Pavlova OA, Chefer SI, et al. 5-substituted derivatives of 6-halogeno-3-((2-(S)-azetidinyl)methoxy)pyridine and 6-halogeno-3-((2-(S)-pyrrolidinyl)methoxy)pyridine with low picomolar affinity for alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and wide range of lipophilicity: potential probes for imaging with positron emission tomography. J Med Chem. 2004;47(10):2453–65. doi: 10.1021/jm030432v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Paterson D, Nordberg A. Neuronal nicotinic receptors in the human brain. Prog Neurobiol. 2000;61(1):75–111. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(99)00045-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Villemagne VL, Musachio JL, Scheffel U. Nicotine and related compounds as PET and SPECT ligands. In: Arneric SP, Brioni JD, editors. Neuronal nicotinic receptors, pharmacology and therapeutic opportunities. New York: Johns Wiley & Sons; 1999. pp. 235–50. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abreo MA, Lin NH, Garvey DS, et al. Novel 3-pyridyl ethers with subnanomolar affinity for central neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Med Chem. 1996;39(4):817–25. doi: 10.1021/jm9506884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Spande TF, Garraffo HM, Edwards MW, et al. Epibatidine: a novel (chloropyridyl)azabicycloheptane with potent analgesic activity from an Ecuadoran poison frog. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114(9):3475–8. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Brown LL, Pavlova O, Mukhin A, et al. Radiosynthesis of 5-[2-(4-pyridinyl)vinyl]-6-chloro-3-[(1-[11C]methyl-2-(S)-pyrrolidinyl)methoxy]pyridine, a high affinity ligand for studying nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by positron emission tomography. Bioorg Med Chem. 2001;9(11):3055–8. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(01)00224-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brown LL, Kulkarni S, Pavlova OA, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of a novel series of 2-chloro-5-(1-methyl-2-(S)-pyrrolidinyl)methoxy)-3-(2-(4-pyridinyl)vinyl) pyridine analogues as potential positron emission tomography imaging agents for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Med Chem. 2002;45(13):2841–9. doi: 10.1021/jm010550n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brown L, Chefer S, Pavlova O, et al. Evaluation of 5-(2-(4-pyridinyl)vinyl)-6-chloro-3-(1-methyl-2-(S)-pyrrolidinylmethoxy)pyridine and its analogues as PET radioligands for imaging nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neurochem. 2004;91(3):600–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gao Y, Ravert HT, Kuwabara H, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel carbon-11 labeled pyridyl ethers: candidate ligands for in vivo imaging of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) with positron emission tomography. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009 Jul 1;17(13):4367–77. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 May 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gao Y, Ravert HT, Holt D, et al. 6-Chloro-3-(((1-[11C]methyl)-2-(S)-pyrrolidinyl)methoxy)-5-(2-fluoropyridi n-4-yl)pyridine ([11C]JHU85270), a potent ligand for nicotinic acetylcholine receptor imaging by positron emission tomography. Appl Radiat Isot. 2007;65(8):947–51. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Easwaramoorthy B, Pichika R, Collins D, et al. Effect of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on the binding of nicotinic alpha4beta2 receptor PET radiotracer, (18)F-nifene: a measure of acetylcholine competition. Synapse. 2007;61(1):29–36. doi: 10.1002/syn.20338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pichika R, Easwaramoorthy B, Collins D, et al. Nicotinic alpha4beta2 receptor imaging agents: part II. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-[18F]fluoro-3-[2-((S)-3-pyrrolinyl)methoxy]pyridine (18F-nifene) in rodents and imaging by PET in nonhuman primate. Nucl Med Biol. 2006;33(3):295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wei ZL, Xiao Y, Yuan H, et al. Novel pyridyl ring C5 substituted analogues of epibatidine and 3-(1-methyl-2(S)-pyrrolidinylmethoxy)pyridine (A-84543) as highly selective agents for neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing beta2 subunits. J Med Chem. 2005;48(6):1721–4. doi: 10.1021/jm0492406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kozikowski AP, Chellappan SK, Henderson D, et al. Acetylenic pyridines for use in PET imaging of nicotinic receptors. Chem Med Chem. 2006;2(1):54–7. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200600220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Spang JE, Bertrand S, Westera G, et al. Chemical modification of epibatidine causes a switch from agonist to antagonist and modifies its selectivity for neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Chem Biol. 2000;7(7):545–55. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(00)00138-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Carroll FI, Ma W, Yokota Y, et al. Synthesis, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor binding, and antinociceptive properties of 3′-substituted deschloroepibatidine analogues. Novel nicotinic antagonists. J Med Chem. 2005;48(4):1221–8. doi: 10.1021/jm040160b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ding YS, Kil KE, Lin KS, et al. A novel nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist radioligand for PET studies. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006;16(4):1049–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.10.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Badio B, Shi D, Garraffo HM, et al. Antinociceptive effects of the alkaloid epibatidine—further-studies on involvement of nicotinic receptors. Drug Dev Res. 1995;36(1):46–59. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gao Y, Horti AG, Kuwabara H, et al. Derivatives of (−)-7-methyl-2-(5-(pyridinyl)pyridin-3-yl)-7-azabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane are potential ligands for positron emission tomography imaging of extrathalamic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Med Chem. 2007;50(16):3814–24. doi: 10.1021/jm070224t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gao Y, Horti AG, Kuwabara H, et al. New synthesis and evaluation of enantiomers of 7-methyl-2-exo-(3′-iodo-5′-pyridinyl)-7-azabicyclo[2.2. 1]heptane as stereoselective ligands for PET imaging of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18(23):6168–70. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huang Y, Zhu Z, Xiao Y, et al. Epibatidine analogues as selective ligands for the alpha(x)beta2-containing subtypes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15(19):4385–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Carroll FI, Ware R, Brieaddy LE, et al. Synthesis, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor binding, and antinociceptive properties of 2′-fluoro-3′-(substituted phenyl)deschloroepibatidine analogues. Novel nicotinic antagonist. J Med Chem. 2004;47(18):4588–94. doi: 10.1021/jm040078g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Valette H, Dolle F, Saba W, et al. [18F]FPhEP and [18F]F2PhEP, two new epibatidine-based radioligands: evaluation for imaging nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in baboon brain. Synapse. 2007;61(9):764–70. doi: 10.1002/syn.20426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Roger G, Saba W, Valette H, et al. Synthesis and radiosynthesis of [(18)F]FPhEP, a novel alpha(4)-beta(2)-selective, epibatidine-based antagonist for PET imaging of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006;14(11):3848–58. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Deuther-Conrad W, Patt JT, Lockman PR, et al. Norchloro-fluoro-homoepibatidine (NCFHEB) - a promising radioligand for neuroimaging nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with PET. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008;18(3):222–9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2007.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Brust P, Patt JT, Deuther-Conrad W, et al. In vivo measurement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with [18F]norchloro-fluoro-homoepibatidine. Synapse. 2008;62(3):205–18. doi: 10.1002/syn.20480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Deuther-Conrad W, Patt JT, Feuerbach D, et al. Norchloro-fluoro-homoepibatidine: specificity to neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in vitro. Farmaco. 2004;59(10):785–92. doi: 10.1016/j.farmac.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gao Y, Kuwabara H, Spivak CE, et al. Discovery of (−)-7-methyl-2-exo-[3′-(6-[18F]fluoropyridin-2-yl)-5′-pyridinyl]-7-azabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, a radiolabeled antagonist for cerebral nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (alpha4beta2-nAChR) with optimal positron emission tomography imaging properties. J Med Chem. 2008;51(15):4751–64. doi: 10.1021/jm800323d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





