Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1966 Sep;92(3):769–779. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.3.769-779.1966

Hyper-reactivity of Rabbits Sensitized with Bartonella bacilliformis

Paul D Mitchell 1, John M Slack 1
PMCID: PMC276321  PMID: 4958777

Abstract

Mitchell, Paul D. (West Virginia University Medical Center, Morgantown), and John M. Slack. Hyper-reactivity of rabbits sensitized with Bartonella bacilliformis. J. Bacteriol. 92:769–779. 1966.—Sensitization with viable cells of Bartonella bacilliformis increased the susceptibility of rabbits to the lethality of subsequently administered Bartonella metabolites. In animals sensitized with 3 weekly doses of the organism, this susceptible state of hyper-reactivity was maximal between 4 and 14 days postsensitization (primary hyper-reactive state) and persisted for at least 4 weeks, after which the animals were nonreactive (tolerant state). However, on the 84th day, the susceptible state could once again be demonstrated (secondary hyper-reactive state). Animals sensitized with only 1 or 2 weekly doses of the organism were rendered nearly as susceptible, but the time interval between the primary and secondary states of hyper-reactivity was much shorter, indicating that the hyper-reactive states were dependent upon the degree of sensitization. Symptoms displayed by such animals demonstrated an association with endotoxic shock and an anaphylactic or immediate hypersensitive response, the reaction frequently being severe enough to lead to the death of the animal within 24 hr. The histological findings were those of the generalized Shwartzman phenomenon with indications of shock. Such hyper-reactive animals produced an early-occurring, precipitating antibody specific for the somatic, endotoxic component of various gram-positive microorganisms. Injection of sera from the hyper-reactive animals into normal, nonsensitized animals resulted in a passive, hyper-reactive state in the latter animals. A distinct relationship between the levels of specific antibody and the degree of demonstrable hyper-reactivity was observed. This relationship is discussed relative to the histological findings of the hyper-reactive animals.

Full text

PDF
769

Images in this article

775Image
on p.775
775Image
on p.775
776Image
on p.776
776Image
on p.776
777Image
on p.777
777Image
on p.777

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABERNATHY R. S., BRADLEY G. M., SPINK W. W. Increased susceptibility of mice with brucellosis to bacterial endotoxins. J Immunol. 1958 Oct;81(4):271–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ABERNATHY R. S., SPINK W. W. Studies on the role of histamine in the increased susceptibility to bacterial endotoxins induced by pertussis vaccine. J Immunol. 1956 Dec;77(6):418–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRUNSON J. G., THOMAS L., GAMBLE C. N. Morphologic changes in rabbits following the intravenous administration of meningococcal toxin. II. Two appropriately spaced injections; the rôle of fibrinoid in the generalized Shwartzman reaction. Am J Pathol. 1955 Jul-Aug;31(4):655–667. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DUBOS R. J., SCHAEDLER R. W., BOHME D. Effects of bacterial endotoxins on susceptibility to infection with gram-positive and acid-fast bacteria. Fed Proc. 1957 Sep;16(3):856–857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DUBOS R. J., SCHAEDLER R. W. The effect of the intestinal flora on the growth rate of mice, and on their susceptibility to experimental infections. J Exp Med. 1960 Mar 1;111:407–417. doi: 10.1084/jem.111.3.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MITCHELL P. D., BURRELL R. G. SEROLOGY OF THE MIMA-HERELLEA GROUP AND THE GENUS MORAXELLA. J Bacteriol. 1964 Apr;87:900–909. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.4.900-909.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. OSBORN M. J., ROSEN S. M., ROTHFIELD L., HORECKER B. L. Biosynthesis of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. I. Enzymatic incorporation of galactose in a mutant strain of Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Oct 15;48:1831–1838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.10.1831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PIRSCH J. B., MIKA L. A., VAN DER MAATEN M. J. Hyperreactivity of Coxiella burnetii infected guinea pigs to subsequent injections of bacterial endotoxins. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1957 Nov;96(2):376–380. doi: 10.3181/00379727-96-23482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. RIBI E., MILNER K. C., PERRINE T. D. Endotoxic and antigenic fractions from the cell wall of Salmonella enteritidis; methods for separation and some biologic activities. J Immunol. 1959 Jan;82(1):75–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ROBBINS J., STETSON C. A., Jr An effect of antigen-antibody interaction on blood coagulation. J Exp Med. 1959 Jan 1;109(1):1–8. doi: 10.1084/jem.109.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. STETSON C. A., Jr Similarities in the mechanisms determining the Arthus and Shwartzman phenomena. J Exp Med. 1951 Oct;94(4):347–358. doi: 10.1084/jem.94.4.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. STETSON C. A., Jr Studies on the mechanism of the Shwartzman phenomenon; similarities between reactions to endotoxins and certain reactions of bacterial allergy. J Exp Med. 1955 Apr 1;101(4):421–436. doi: 10.1084/jem.101.4.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. STETSON C. A., Jr Symposium on bacterial endotoxins. IV. Immunological aspects of the host reaction to endotoxins. Bacteriol Rev. 1961 Dec;25:457–458. doi: 10.1128/br.25.4.457-458.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. STORCK H. Uber hämorrhagische Phänomene in der Dermatologie. Dermatologica. 1951;102(4-6):197–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SUTER E. HYPERREACTIVITY TO ENDOTOXIN AFTER INFECTION WITH BCG. J Immunol. 1964 Jan;92:49–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SUTER E. Hyperreactivity to endotoxin in mice infected with BCG. Studies on the role of concomitant infection. J Immunol. 1962 Sep;89:377–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SUTER E., MUNOZ J. J. EFFECT OF BCG INFECTION ON SENSITIVITY OF MICE TO HISTAMINE, SEROTONIN AND PASSIVELY INDUCED ANAPHYLAXIS. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1963 Oct;114:211–213. doi: 10.3181/00379727-114-28628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SUTER E., ULLMAN G. E., HOFFMAN R. G. Sensitivity of mice to endotoxin after vaccination with BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1958 Oct;99(1):167–169. doi: 10.3181/00379727-99-24282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. THOMAS L., DENNY F. W., Jr, FLOYD J. Studies on the generalized Shwartzman reaction. III. Lesions of the myocardium and coronary arteries accompanying the reaction in rabbits prepared by infection with group A streptococci. J Exp Med. 1953 May;97(5):751–766. doi: 10.1084/jem.97.5.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. THOMAS L., GOOD R. A. Studies on the generalized Shwartzman reaction: I. General observations concerning the phenomenon. J Exp Med. 1952 Dec;96(6):605–624. doi: 10.1084/jem.96.6.605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WEIL M. H., SPINK W. W. A comparison of shock due to endotoxin with anaphylactic shock. J Lab Clin Med. 1957 Oct;50(4):501–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES