Abstract
Background:
In 2004, the Puerto Rico Department of Health implemented the Puerto Rico Quitline (PRQ), a proactive, telephone-based smoking cessation counseling program. This study examines the demographic and smoking-related characteristics of the individuals served by the PRQ.
Methods:
Analyses included PRQ participants registered from December 2004-December 2005. PRQ call rates and rate ratios (RR) were calculated overall, among smokers, and stratified by relevant covariates. Associations between sex and relevant characteristics of PRQ participants were compared using regression models.
Results:
Call rates per 100,000 smokers in PR were lower among men than women (RR=0.50, 95% CI=0.44-0.56), and higher among all age groups ≥ 25 years of age as compared to those aged 15-24 years (RRs=4.34-8.14) and among smokers living in the San Juan metropolitan area relative to smokers residing outside the metropolitan area (RR=1.45, 95% CI=1.29-1.63). Mass media was the most common way in which participants learned about the PRQ (>70%), with only 2-3% of callers reporting a physician's referral as the source of their information about the PRQ. With respect to reasons for quitting, men were less likely than women to report concern about a child's health (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.46-0.84) and cigarette odor (OR=0.64, 95% CI=0.41-0.99). Meanwhile, men were more likely (OR=1.39, 95% CI=1.01-1.91) to report the influence of other smokers as a barrier during quitting.
Conclusions:
PRQ promotion and outreach efforts should target populations underserved by the PRQ including male, young adult, and non-metropolitan area smokers. Initiatives that link the PRQ with primary care providers in promoting smoking cessation should be encouraged.
Keywords: Quitline, Tobacco cessation programs, Telephone counseling, Puerto Ricans
Smoking is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in the United States (1-2). Although the prevalence of smoking among Puerto Ricans living in Puerto Rico is lower (13.1%) than among the U.S. general population (20.6%) (3), five of the seven leading causes of death in Puerto Rico (heart disease, malignant tumors, cerebrovascular diseases, hypertensive diseases and chronic pulmonary disease) are associated with smoking (4). Moreover, 11.5% of all deaths and 10% of all health care costs in Puerto Rico are attributable to smoking (5). Therefore, reducing tobacco use is a critical public health concern. In addition, over 60% of current smokers in Puerto Rico report that they want to quit smoking (6) highlighting the importance of promoting smoking cessation among the Puerto Rican population.
A key component of national tobacco control efforts in the U.S. is the provision of smoking cessation programs to all interested smokers through the North American Quitline Consortium (7). The effectiveness of proactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation has been empirically demonstrated among both the general population and Hispanic smokers (8-9). Unfortunately, there is some evidence to suggest that the use of quitlines by Hispanic smokers may be low and that increased efforts to reach this population are necessary (9).
In 2004, the Puerto Rico Department of Health implemented the Puerto Rico Quitline (PRQ). The PRQ is a proactive telephone-based smoking cessation program funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Individuals can call the PRQ directly (phone number 1-877-335-2567) or be connected automatically when calling the national quitline number (phone number 1-800-QUIT-NOW). When a caller reaches the PRQ for the first time, he or she provides personal and demographic information and establishes a quit date within the next 30 days. Prior to the quit date, a Quit Kit containing self-help materials and other items (e.g., stress ball) is sent to participants via regular mail. Up to 8 proactive counseling calls are made to participants by PRQ's trained cessation counselors. Each of these calls involves up to 3 calling attempts in order to contact the participant. Proactive calls start the day before the established quit date and end within a year. Some promotional campaigns are launched throughout the year by the PRQ such as a Quit & Win contest and during the World No Tobacco Day activities.
The purpose of the current study is to describe the demographic and smoking-related characteristics of individuals served by the PRQ. A better understanding of the smokers accessing the PRQ is essential for program evaluation and can facilitate identification of specific subgroups of Puerto Rican smokers who may be underserved by the PRQ. Such data can facilitate the targeting of PRQ's promotional and outreach efforts.
Methods
Participants and procedures
During its first year of operation (from December 22, 2004 to December 31, 2005), 1,604 callers registered in the PRQ, and 1,323 (82.5%) of those callers completed an interview in which they provided demographic, lifestyle, and health information. Institutional Review Board approvals for secondary data analyses were provided by the University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus and The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.
Study variables
Demographic information included: sex (male/female) and age (15-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54 and 55-64, ≥65 years). In addition, callers from any of the seven municipalities that compose the San Juan metropolitan area (Carolina, Trujillo Alto, San Juan, Guaynabo, Bayamon, Toa Baja, and Catafio) were differentiated from those calling from other regions of the island using the variable metropolitan area (yes/no).
Tobacco-related data included: number of years smoking, time of first cigarette consumed daily (≤ 30 minutes/>30 minutes), desire to stop smoking in the next 30 days (yes/no), number of attempts to stop smoking in the past, reasons for wanting to stop smoking [family request (yes/no); health improvement (yes/no); cost (yes/ no); cigarette odor (yes/no); made a promise (yes/no); physician advice (yes/no); child's health (yes/no); tired of smoking (yes/no); and self-control (yes/no)]. Respondents also indicated which of the following were barriers to quitting: withdrawal symptoms (yes/no), weight gain (yes/no), influence of other smokers (yes/no), and unsuccessful attempts (yes/no). In addition, participants reported how they had learned about the PRQ [mass media (written press, TV, radio, web, and written advertisement), physician's referral, brochure, family/friend, or other]. This last question was not part of the PRQ interview until its seventh month of operation.
Statistical Analysis
The rates of smokers who registered with the PRQ (per 100,000 total population) were calculated by dividing the number of PRQ callers by the overall population according to the Census 2005 population projections of persons living in Puerto Rico (10). Rates of registered callers were also calculated for the estimated number of smokers aged 18 years old and older who were living in Puerto Rico according to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey 2005 (BRFSS) (3). The BRFSS is a population-based survey conducted annually in the United States and Puerto Rico. For both the overall population and the smoking population, rates of registered smokers were calculated specifically by sex and age group, also using Census 2005 projections and BRFSS 2005 data. Because the BRFSS does not provide prevalence estimates of current smoking in Puerto Rico by municipality, the rate of registered smokers by metropolitan area of residence (overall and among smokers) was calculated using as a reference the prevalence of smoking by municipality in Puerto Rico for the year 2003, according to the Continuous Health Survey for the Municipalities of Puerto Rico, an annual population-based household interview survey conducted in the Island (6).
The rate ratio (RR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for the registration call rates were calculated using Poisson regression models (11). Contingency tables were used to describe the frequency distributions of study variables by sex. In addition, the crude and age-adjusted associations between sex and relevant characteristics of PRQ participants were compared using logistic regression models (11) and polytomous logistic regression models (12). Likelihood ratio tests were used to evaluate the potential effect modification of age on the association between sex and outcome variables within the models (12).
Results
Registration rates
PRQ call rates per 100,000 total population and per 100,000 smokers by demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1. In general, similar rates of males and females accessed the PRQ during the study period; callers were largely middle-aged and resided in the metropolitan area of Puerto Rico. The overall rate of registered callers from December 2004-December 2005 was 34 per every 100,000 people and 373 per 100,000 smokers. Although the call rates were approximately equal for men and women in the general population, the call rate was 50% lower among the male smoking population when compared to the female smoking population (RR=0.50, 95% CI=0.44-0.56). Overall and smoking population call rates were higher in each of the age groups of 25 years and older than among those 15-24 years old, and were highest among individuals 35-44 years old. Individuals living in the metropolitan area also had higher call rates compared to those living in the non-metropolitan area (RR=1.45, 95% CI=1.29-1.63).
Table 1.
Registration call rate (per 100,000 individuals) and rate ratios (RR) by sex, age and area of residence among the overall population and among smokers (n=1323).
| n (%) | Rate Among the Overall Population (per 100,000 population) |
RR (95% CI)f | Rate Among Smokers (per 100,000 smokers) |
RR (95% CI)f | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1323 | 33.67 | -- | 372.71 | -- |
| Sexa,d | |||||
| Female | 685 (51.9) | 25.75 | 1.00 | 417.60 | 1.00 |
| Male | 634 (48.1) | 25.28 | 0.98 (0.87, 1.11) | 208.42 | 0.50 (0.44, 0.56) |
|
Age group (years)b,d |
|||||
| 15-24 | 39 (3.2) | 5.74 | 1.00 | 57.61 | 1.00 |
| 25-34 | 236 (19.1) | 39.20 | 6.83 (4.78, 9.76) | 249.78 | 4.34 (3.03, 6.20) |
| 35-44 | 320 (26.0) | 53.73 | 9.36 (6.59, 13.30) | 469.14 | 8.14 (5.73, 11.57) |
| 45-54 | 354 (28.7) | 66.16 | 11.53 (8.13, 16.34) | 401.64 | 6.97 (4.92, 9.88) |
| 55-64 | 199 (16.1) | 42.88 | 7.47 (5.20, 10.74) | 390.78 | 6.78 (4.72, 9.75) |
| ≥65 | 85 (6.9) | 15.79 | 2.75 (1.84, 4.10) | 267.54 | 4.64 (3.11.6.93) |
|
Metropolitan areac,e |
|||||
| No | 712 (60.0) | 24.99 | 1.00 | 232.93 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 474 (40.0) | 40.84 | 1.63 (1.45, 1.84) | 338.24 | 1.45 (1.29, 1.63) |
Missing values:
= 4
= 90
= 137
= Rates calculated using Census 2005 projections and BRFSS 2005 population estimates.
= Rates among smokers calculated using current smoking by municipality according to the Continuous Health Survey for the Municipalities of Puerto Rico, 2003.
= RR calculated using the Poisson Model.
Characteristics of PRQ callers
Regarding their smoking history, the majority of callers were interested in quitting within the next 30 days, smoked within the first 30 minutes of awakening (Table 2), and had tried to quit previously (median=3.0 times) (data not shown). Average duration of years smoking in this population was 23.0 ± 13.5 years, and did not differ by sex (data not shown). When asked about the reasons for wanting to quit smoking, over 90% of smokers mentioned they were tired of smoking and more than 80% reported an interest in improving their health. Only about 5% of smokers reported advice from a physician as a reason for their interest in quitting. Withdrawal symptoms were the most frequently cited difficulty encountered when trying to quit (reported by over 60% of smokers). Mass media was the most common way in which participants learned about the PRQ (reported by approximately 70% of smokers). Only 2-3% of callers reported a physician's referral as their source of information about the PRQ.
Table 2.
Crude and age-adjusted associations between sex and relevant characteristics of PRQ participants (n=1183).
| Characteristics | Sex | n (%) | OR Crude (95% CI) |
OR Age Adjusted (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Want to stop smoking in the next 30 days |
Male | 549 (96.8) | 1.45 (0.79, 2.66) | 1.48 (0.81, 2.72) |
| Female | 588 (95.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
Smoke within 30 minutes of awakening |
Male | 463 (81.7) | 0.76 (0.56, 1.04) | 0.77 (0.56, 1.05) |
| Female | 526 (85.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
Previously tried to stop smoking |
Male | 505 (89.0) | 1.29 (0.91, 1.83) | 1.27 (0.89, 1.80) |
| Female | 532 (86.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Reasons for wanting to stop smoking | ||||
| Health improvement | Male | 474 (83.6) | 1.13 (0.84, 1.53) | 1.18 (0.87, 1.60) |
| Female | 504 (91.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Child's health | Male | 102 (18.0) | 0.69 (0.52, 0.91) | 0.62 (0.46, 0.84) |
| Female | 149 (24.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Tired of smoking | Male | 526 (92.8) | 0.96 (0.62, 1.50) | 0.96 (0.61, 1.50) |
| Female | 573 (93.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Family request | Male | 76 (13.4) | 1.08 (0.77, 1.52) | 1.11 (0.79, 1.56) |
| Female | 77 (12.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Cigarette odor | Male | 35 (6.2) | 0.64 (0.42, 1.00) | 0.64 (0.41, 0.99) |
| Female | 57 (9.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Money spent | Male | 136 (24.0) | 1.12 (0.86, 1.47) | 1.08 (0.82, 1.42) |
| Female | 132 (21.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Physician advice | Male | 31 (5.5) | 1.02 (0.62, 1.69) | 0.98 (0.59, 1.64) |
| Female | 33 (5.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Have control | Male | 25 (4.4) | 0.87 (0.51, 1.49) | 0.88 (0.51, 1.52) |
| Female | 31 (5.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Made a promise | Male | 10 (1.8) | 0.99 (0.42, 2.34) | 1.00 (0.42, 2.38) |
| Female | 11 (1.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Difficulties encountered to stop smoking | ||||
| Withdrawal symptoms | Male | 341 (60.1) | 0.88 (0.70, 1.11) | 0.87 (0.69, 1.10) |
| Female | 389 (63.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Influence of other smokers | Male | 103 (18.2) | 1.43 (1.04, 1.95) | 1.39 (1.01, 1.91) |
| Female | 83 (13.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Unsuccessful attempts | Male | 61 (10.8) | 1.12 (0.77, 1.63) | 1.15 (0.79, 1.68) |
| Female | 60 (9.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Weight gaina | Male | 32 (5.6) | -- | -- |
| Female | 70 (11.4) | -- | -- | |
| How did you learn about the PRQ?b,c | ||||
| Mass media | Male | 249 (74.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Female | 261 (71.2) | |||
| Physicians referral | Male | 7 (2.0) | 0.67 (0.25, 1.75) | 0.65 (0.25, 1.71) |
| Female | 11 (3.0) | |||
| Family/friend | Male | 26 (7.7) | 1.18 (0.66, 2.13) | 1.18 (0.66, 2.13) |
| Female | 23 (6.3) | |||
| Brochure | Male | 5 (1.5) | 1.05 (0.30, 3.66) | 1.04 (0.30, 3.65) |
| Female | 5 (1.4) | |||
| Other | Male | 49 (14.6) | 0.77 (0.51, 1.15) | 0.78 (0.52, 1.17) |
| Female | 67 (18.3) |
= Significant interaction by sex.
= 703 respondents
= Estimates using polytomous logistic regression model with “Mass media″ as the reference group.
There were significant sex differences on several characteristics. Men were less likely than women to cite a child's health (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.46-0.84) and cigarette odor (OR=0.64,95% CI=0.41-0.99) as reasons for wanting to quit. Men were more likely than women to report the influence of other smokers as a barrier during smoking cessation (OR=1.39,95%CI=1.01-1.91). Meanwhile, a significant interaction between age and sex was observed for the variable weight gain, where only in the age group of 34 to 45 years men were less likely than women to report that weight gain represented a difficulty for smoking cessation (OR=0.13, 95% CI=0.04-0.39) (data not shown).
On the other hand, no differences were observed between men and women in the following reasons for wanting to stop smoking: health improvement, tired of smoking, family request, money spent, physician advice, want to have control and made a promise. In addition, no sex differences were observed regarding withdrawal symptoms and unsuccessful attempts as barriers to stop smoking; nor in the way in which men and women learned about the PRQ.
Discussion
The present study showed that although the overall reach of the PRQ is generally congruent with that of other quitlines, comparisons of the people enrolled across demographic characteristics suggest that certain groups may be underserved relative to others, and that targeted promotional and outreach strategies should be considered.
Consistent with results from other quitlines in the U.S., PRQ callers were predominantly long-term smokers with 95% planning to quit within the next 30 days, and almost 86% having tried to quit previously (13-16). Further, a very high proportion of callers smoked within 30 minutes of awakening, an indicator of tobacco dependence; and withdrawal symptoms were the most commonly reported barrier to quitting (60%). In addition, females aged 34 to 45 years were more likely than men in this age group to report that weight gain represented a difficulty for smoking cessation. Even though this association was observed only in this age group, the direction of the effect is consistent with previous studies (15-17). Finally, men were more likely than women to report the influence of other smokers as a barrier to quitting (18).
Also congruent with previous studies, health improvement was cited as one of the principal reasons for wanting to quit smoking (15). However, only 5.5% of smokers reported that a physician's advice was a reason for their interest in quitting. This finding suggests that physicians are either not advising this population to quit or that, if advice is given, it has not been effective in motivating the decision to quit. Future studies should further address this issue in Puerto Rico, as the 2000 National Health Interview Survey and other surveys performed in the U.S. have shown that Hispanics are less likely to receive smoking cessation advice from their doctor as compared to other racial/ethnic groups (19-20).
Overall, the reach of the PRQ among smokers in Puerto Rico is substantially lower than that of other quitlines around the world. The PRQ's annual call rate of 373 per 100,000 smokers is much lower than the monthly call rate reported by New Zealand's National Quitline (272 and 395 per 100,000 smokers) (21). In addition, on an annual basis, less than 1% of the population of smokers in Puerto Rico registered with the PRQ, whereas 4.2% of the population of adult smokers in England called their quitline (22). Thus, there is substantial room for improving the reach of the PRQ. Several factors that may have contributed to lower call rates than those found in New Zealand and England include the newness of the PRQ (data are from the first year of operation) and the extremely limited promotional budget of approximately $30,000 annually (A. Cases, MPA, Puerto Rico's Health Department Tobacco Control and Prevention Division, personal communication, January 17, 2007).
Variations in the rates of registered callers were observed by sex, age group, and area of residence. Specifically, the rate of registered callers per 100,000 smokers was 50% lower among men than women. This finding is consistent with numerous other quitlines (13-14,22-23), but may be of special concern in Puerto Rico because of the much higher smoking prevalence among males than females (18.0% vs. 8.7%) (3). Similarly, while telephone counseling has been shown to increase cessation rates among young smokers in the U.S. (24), the smoking population call rates were much higher among all other age groups when compared to the 15-24 year-old group (4.34≤ RR≤8.14). Young adult smokers have been well represented among quitlines' callers in Massachusetts (13), California (14), and Hong Kong (23) suggesting that current PRQ promotional and outreach efforts have not been very effective in reaching this population. Finally, smokers in non-metropolitan areas of Puerto Rico were less likely to call the PRQ than were smokers in the San Juan metro area. Overall, these results suggest that male, young adult, and non-metropolitan smokers are currently underserved by the PRQ.
With respect to their source of information about the PRQ, 73% of callers reported learning about the quitline through mass media, whereas only 2.4% of callers reported a physician's referral as their source of information, consistent with other quit lines (14). This finding might be expected given that over 80% of the PRQ promotional budget is used for mass media advertisement (A. Cases, MPA, Puerto Rico's Health Department Tobacco Control and Prevention Division, personal communication, January 17, 2007). Data suggesting that Spanish speakers heavily rely on the media as a source of information about tobacco cessation quitlines (14), and the current results support that physician advice is not a primary reason for quitline utilization.
Results from the current study largely mirror those of previous quitline studies with respect to the characteristics of callers, but not with respect to the reach of the PRQ. Reach is particularly low among male, young adults, and non-metropolitan area smokers. Therefore, promotional and outreach strategies will need to specifically target these groups as they appear underserved by the PRQ. Because the PRQ has a low promotion budget, efforts should be made to develop and maintain low budget mass media campaigns capable of attracting more smokers interested in quitting, and in utilizing other low cost strategies to increase call volume. Based on the low rate of physician referral as a source of information about the PRQ, outreach initiatives aimed at increasing the involvement of primary care physicians and other health care professionals in referring their patients to the PRQ appear warranted. This strategy also has the potential for being not only effective, but sustainable and relatively low-cost (25-26).
A major impetus to increase utilization of the PRQ will contribute to the development of a comprehensive tobacco control program for Puerto Rico. For a comprehensive control program to be successful and widely accepted, the involvement of government, academia, community-based organizations, and health care professionals is essential. Because none of the tax recovered from the sales of cigarettes in Puerto Rico and only 2% of the money assigned to the Island as part of the Master Settlement Agreement (27) is currently targeted at tobacco prevention and control efforts, a redirection of at least a portion of these funds could be used to develop and maintain a comprehensive tobacco control program in Puerto Rico. Unfortunately, as it happens in other states, tobacco control efforts remain under-funded relative to the disease burden resulting from tobacco use (28). On a positive note, the government of Puerto Rico recently passed an amendment to the Law to Regulate the Practice of Smoking in Public Places, which prohibits smoking in public and private workplaces among others in Puerto Rico (29). Similar legislation in other countries (21, 26, 30-32) has demonstrated that such laws reduce cigarette consumption and promote smoking cessation. Future research should be able to evaluate, among others, the effect of this law on quitline usage. Therefore, the PRQ will continue to play a central role in tobacco control efforts in Puerto Rico.
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the NCI Grant U54CA96297 for the Puerto Rico Cancer Center/The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Partners for Excellence in Cancer Research; R25T CA57730; and the RCMI Program Grant G12RR03051. We would like to acknowledge the following people for their contributions to this manuscript: Erick Suárez, PhD, Eduardo Hernández, MPH, and Laura Bretaña, members from the Shared Resource Core, PRCC/MDACC: Partners for Excellence in Cancer Research (Grant U54CA96297); and Gilberto Ramos, DrPH, Principal Investigator of the Continuous Health Survey for the Municipalities of Puerto Rico.
References
- 1.Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291:1238–1245. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs---United States, 1995--1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:300–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
- 4.Departamento de Salud de Puerto Rico . Reporte Anual de Estadísticas Vitales en Puerto Rico, 2004. Departamento de Salud de Puerto Rico, Secretaria Auxiliar de Planificación y Desarrollo; San Juan, PR: 2004. p. 141. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dietz VJ, Novotny TE, Rigau-Pérez JG, Schultz JM. Smoking attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and direct health care cost for Puerto Rico. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1991;25:77–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ramos G. Estudio Continue de Salud, 2003. Available from: URL: http://www.rcm.upr.edu/PublicHealth/bio-epi/Estudio_Continuo/Presentacion-Estudio-Continuo-de-Salud_2003.pdf.
- 7.North American Quitline Consortium Quitline map. Available from: URL: http://naquitline.org.
- 8.Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Cohen SJ, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: Clinical practice guideline. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; Rockville, MD: 2000. pp. 96–97. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wetter DW, Mazas C, Daza P, et al. Reaching and treating Spanish speaking smokers through the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2007;109(Suppl 2):406–413. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Junta de Planificación de Puerto Rico, Oficina del Censo Proyecciones Preparadas por la Junta de Planificación. Available from: URL: http://www.gobierno.pr/Censo/ProyeccionPoblacion/ProyeccionesJP.htm.
- 11.Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 5th edition Duxbury Thomson Learning; Pacific Grove, CA: 2000. p. 702. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. Second edition John Wiley & Sons, Inc; New York, NY: 2000. pp. 56–72. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Prout MN, Martínez O, Ballas J, et al. Who uses the Smoker's Quitline in Massachusetts? Tob Control. 2002;11(Suppl 2):74–75. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_2.ii74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhu SH, Anderson CM, Johnson CE, Tedeschi G, Roeseler A. A centralized telephone service for tobacco cessation: the California experience. Tob Control. 2000;9(Suppl II):48–55. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_2.ii48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.United States Department of Health and Human Services . A report of the Surgeon General. Public Health Service; Rockville, MD: 2001. Women and smoking; pp. 23–142. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gilbert H, Sutton S, Sutherland G. Who calls QUIT? The characteristics of smokers seeking advice via a telephone helpline compared with smokers attending a clinic and those in the general population. Public Health. 2005;119:933–939. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Perkins KA. Smoking Cessation in Women. Special Considerations. CNS Drugs. 2001;15:391–411. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200115050-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pirie PL, Murray DM, Luepker RV. Gender differences in cigarette smoking and quitting in a cohort of young adults. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:324–327. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.3.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.López-Quintero C, Crum RM, Neumark YD. Racial/ethnic disparities in report of physician-provided smoking cessation advice: Analysis of the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:2235–2239. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.071035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Winkleby MA, Schooler C, Kraemer HC, Lin J, Fortmann SP. Hispanic versus White smoking patterns by sex and level of education. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:410–418. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wilson N, Thomson G, Grigg M, Afzal R. New smoke-free environments legislation stimulates calls to a national Quitline. Tob Control. 2005;14:287–288. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.011726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Owen L. Impact of a telephone helpline for smokers who called during a mass media campaign. Tob Control. 2000;9:148–154. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Abdullah AS, Lam TH, Chan SS, Hedley AJ. Which smokers use the smoking-cessation Quitline in Hong Kong, and how effective is the quitline? Tob Control. 2004;13:415–421. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rabius V, McAlister AL, Geiger A, Huang P, Todd R. Telephone counseling increases cessation rates among young adult smokers. Health Psychol. 2004;23:539–541. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zwar NA, Richmond RL. Role of the general practitioner in smoking-cessation. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006;25:21–26. doi: 10.1080/09595230500459487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Borland R, Owen N, Hill D, Schofield P. Predicting attempts and sustained cessation of smoking after the introduction of workplace smoking bans. Health Psychol. 1991;10:336–342. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.10.5.336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Master Settlement Agreement Available at: URL: http://caag.state.ca.us/tobacco/pdi71insa.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2006.
- 28.Keller PA, Bailey LA, Koss KJ, Baker TB, Fiore MC. Organization, financing, promotion, and cost of U.S. quitlines, 2004. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.National Latino Council on Alcohol and Tobacco Prevention Congratulations from LCAT! Governor signs lawprohibiting smoking in public and private places. National Latino Council on Alcohol and Tobacco Prevention Newsletter. 2006;10:10–11. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Brownson RC, Hopkins DP, Wakefield MA. Effects of smoking restrictions in the workplace. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:333–348. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chapman S, Borland R, Scollo M, Brownson RC, Dominello A, Woodward S. The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1018–1023. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.7.1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Longo DR, Johnson JC, Kruse RL, Brownson RC, Hewett JE. A prospective investigation of the impact of smoking bans on tobacco cessation and relapse. Tob Control. 2001;10:267–272. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.3.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
