Abstract
Peroxynitrite (PN)-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in the secondary injury process after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). This study investigated the detrimental effects of the PN donor SIN-1 (3-morpholinosydnonimine) on isolated healthy spinal cord mitochondria and the protective effects of tempol, a catalytic scavenger of PN-derived radicals. A 5 min exposure of the mitochondria to SIN-1 caused a dose-dependent decrease in the respiratory control ratio (RCR) that was accompanied by significant increases in complex I-driven states II and IV respiration rates and decreases in states III and V. These impairments occurred together with an increase in mitochondrial protein 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT), but not in lipid peroxidation (LP)-related 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE). Tempol significantly antagonized the respiratory effects of SIN-1 in parallel with an attenuation of 3-NT levels. These results show that the exogenous PN donor, SIN-1, rapidly causes mitochondrial oxidative damage and complex I dysfunction identical to traumatic spinal cord mitochondrial impairment and that this is mainly due to tyrosine nitration. Consistent with that, the protection of mitochondrial respiratory function by tempol is associated with a decrease in 3-NT levels in mitochondrial proteins also similar to the previously reported antioxidant actions of tempol in traumatically-injured spinal cord mitochondria.
Keywords: Tempol, spinal cord, mitochondria, nitrotyrosine, lipid peroxidation, oxidative damage
Introduction
Over the past few years, there has been increasing appreciation of the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in the secondary injury cascade following central nervous system (CNS) trauma [1–4]. Among these reactive species, an important player is peroxynitrite (PN) formed by the diffusion-controlled combination of nitric oxide (•NO) and superoxide () [5,6]. Peroxynitrite, commonly referred to as a reactive nitrogen species (RNS), exerts its cytotoxic effects through its derived free radicals (•OH, •NO2, CO3•–), which lead to oxidative damage by nitrating and oxidizing proteins, lipids (lipid peroxidation, LP) and nucleic acids [7–10]. In particular, PN is a central contributor to protein nitration and its major product 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) is widely used as the footprint for PN formation [11]. Previous in vitro studies have demonstrated that PN impairs mitochondrial respiration through oxidative damage to multiple targets including: (a) cytochrome c, an important component of electron transport chain (ETC) [12]; (b) NADH: ubiquinone reductase (ETC Complex I) [13] and (3) mitochondrial anti-oxidant defense systems (i.e. manganese superoxide dismutase, glutathione) [14]. In agreement, in vivo studies using multiple brain injury models have supported a pivotal role of PN in mediating the progress of secondary injury cascades [15,16]. Additionally, spinal cord injury (SCI)-induced mitochondrial dysfunction is correlated with an increase in oxidative damage including 3-NT in mitochondrial proteins [4,17], strongly suggesting the direct linkage of PN and post-traumatic mitochondrial oxidative damage.
There were two purposes for the current study. First of all, we wanted to determine whether exogenous application of PN to normal spinal cord mitochondria could duplicate the characteristics of post-traumatic spinal cord mitochondrial dysfunction documented previously [17,18]. To test this, we applied the PN donor SIN-1 (3-morpholinosydnonimine) directly to healthy spinal cord mitochondria harvested from non-injured rats to evaluate PN's toxic effects on mitochondrial respiration. SIN-1 is capable of simultaneously generating the PN precursors, •NO and , which form PN at an ultra-rapid diffusion-limited rate [5,6] and it is therefore used as a PN donor for in vitro studies [19,20]. In previous work, we have shown that SIN-1 application to normal rat cerebral cortical mitochondria from uninjured brains is able to replicate mitochondrial dysfunction seen after traumatic brain injury (TBI) together with an increase in mitochondrial 3-NT levels [1,3]. However, in regards to the current work, we postulated that spinal cord mitochondria might be more sensitive to PN based upon the knowledge that rat spinal cord mitochondria have a higher baseline level of oxidative stress compared to brain mitochondria [21]. In addition, we wanted to more conclusively define the relative importance of protein nitration, assessed via 3-NT levels, vs LP-related modification of mitochondrial proteins, as measured by the content of the polyunsaturated fatty acid-derived aldehyde 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE). Our prior work with isolated brain mitochondria exposed to SIN-1 showed a significant increase in 3-NT, but only a non-significant trend towards an increase in 4-HNE [20], suggesting that protein nitration might be the more critical oxidative damage mechanism in this context.
A second purpose of this investigation was to examine the protective effects of tempol (4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl), a prototypical nitroxide antioxidant [22] which has been shown to possess neuroprotective effects in TBI [23,24] and SCI [18,25] models. It has been proposed that tempol's neuroprotective efficacy is largely due to it's ability to catalytically scavenge PN-derived free radicals [22]. Considering this, we hypothesized that tempol should be able to protect mitochondria from PN-induced oxidative damage. Although we have previously reported that tempol can protect rat brain mitochondria from in vitro SIN-1 damage [20], the current study with spinal cord mitochondria included a more complete tempol dose–response analysis in regards to mitochondrial respiratory protection and a more definitive assessment of it's relationship to attenuation of protein tyrosine nitration (3-NT) vs LP-mediated (4-HNE) protein modification.
The results described in this paper demonstrate that SIN-1 delivered PN is able to produce complex I-selective mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction essentially identical to that produced by SCI [18]. This dysfunction is associated with an increased modification of mitochondrial proteins by tyrosine nitration, but not by the LP-related 4-HNE. Furthermore, tempol is able to antagonize SIN-1-induced spinal cord mitochondrial functional impairment together with a complete suppression of the SIN-1 induced 3-NT levels in the mitochondrial proteins. These findings strongly support the hypothesis that PN contributes to post-traumatic mitochondrial failure in the injured spinal cord [4,17,18] and that the ability of tempol to attenuate mitochondrial dysfunction is largely due to protection against PN-mediated nitrative damage to mitochondrial proteins.
Materials and methods
Animals
Experiments were performed with isolated mitochondria from young adult female Sprague–Dawley rats (Charles River, Portage, MI) (200–225 g) that were fed and watered ad libitum. The animals were randomly cycling and were not tested for stage of the estrus cycle. The protocols for spinal cord removal and mitochondrial harvesting were approved by the University of Kentucky Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and are consistent with the NIH Guidelines for the Care and Use of Animals.
Chemicals
Chemicals and mitochondrial respiration substrates including SIN-1 (3-morpholinosydnonimine), tempol (4-hydroxy-TEMPO, free radical), mannitol, sucrose, bovine serum albumin (BSA), ethylene glycol tetra-acetate (EGTA), N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N’-2-ethanesulphonic acid (HEPES) potassium salt, potassium phosphate monobasic anhydrous (KH2PO4), magnesium chloride (MgCl2), malate, pyruvate, adenosine 5’-diphosphate (ADP), oligomycin A, carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone (FCCP), rotenone and succinate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). BCA protein assay kit was obtained from Pierce (Rockford, IL).
Isolation of Ficoll-purified spinal cord mitochondria
Spinal cord mitochondria were extracted as described previously with some modifications [3,4,20,24,25]. Briefly, the rats were decapitated and the spinal cords were quickly squirted out by a 60 ml syringe filled with saline. By using the lumbar enlargement as a landmark, a 2 cm segment of spinal cord containing mid-thoracic region was dissected on a ice-cold glass plate and then homogenized in a Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer containing 2 ml isolation buffer with 1 mmol/L EGTA (215 mmol/L mannitol, 75 mmol/L sucrose, 0.1% BSA, 20 mmol/L HEPES and 1 mmol/L EGTA at PH 7.2). The homogenate was first centrifuged twice at 1300 × g for 3 min to remove cellular debris and nuclei. Then the supernatant was collected and further centrifuged at 13 000 × g for 10 min. The resulting crude mitochondrial pellet was then subjected to nitrogen decompression to release synaptic mitochondria [4,26]. After nitrogen disruption, the mitochondria were placed on top of a discontinuous Ficoll gradient (7.5%, 10%) and centrifuged at 100 000 × g for 30 min. The mitochondrial pellets were then transferred and centrifuged again to yield a tighter pellet. Mitochondrial proteins were suspended with isolation buffer without EGTA and the concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit with a BioTek Synergy HT plate reader (Winooski, VT).
Mitochondrial respiration studies
Figure 1 shows an illustration of mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) and oxidative phosphorylation. The upper panel (Figure 1A) displays a typical respiratory trace of spinal cord mitochondrial respiration. The lower panel (Figure 1B) shows simplified pathways of electron transport through ETC. Briefly, electrons are fed into Complex I (NADH dehydrogenase) by pyruvate and malate or into Complex II (succinate dehydrogenase) by succinate, transported through Complex III (cytochrome reductase), cytochrome c and finally reach Complex IV (cytochrome oxidase). Each electron is accepted by O2 reducing the latter to H2O. As the electron flows, protons (H+) are pumped from the matrix into the mitochondrial intermembrane (IMM) space, thus forming a proton gradient across the IMM. When H+ flows back into the matrix through ATP synthase (Complex V), ADP is phosphorylated to ATP. Knowledge of this oxidative phosphorylation process is crucial to an understanding of the subsequent mitochondrial respiration studies we employed (Figure 1B).
Figure 1.
(A) A representative trace demonstrates the typical respiratory responses of healthy spinal cord mitochondria to a series of substrates. Addition of pyruvate and malate fuel Complex I and initiates respiratory state II; then 2 boli of ADP activate ATP synthase and initiate State III. Next, oligomycin, which is an inhibitor of ATP synthase, largely inhibits respiration so little ADP or O2 is consumed; this is called state IV. FCCP, which is a mitochondrial uncoupler, dissipates the proton gradient and electron transport then works at its maximal extent to make up the loss of the gradient, therefore initiating complex I-driven State V. Finally, rotenone is used to shut down Complex I-driven respiration. Subsequent addition of succinate fuels Complex II to initiate Complex II-driven State V. (B) Simplified illustration of the flow of electron through electron transport chain (ETC) and oxidative phosphorylation. See text for the detailed explanations for the interaction of the substrates with mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and the concepts of respiratory states I–V.
Mitochondrial respiratory rates were measured using a Clark-type electrode as described previously [4,17,20,24,25]. Briefly, 30–35 μg of mitochondrial protein was loaded into a constantly stirred, thermostatically controlled (37°C) chamber (Oxytherm System, Hansatech Instruments Ltd) containing 250 μL of KCl-based respiration buffer (125 mmol/L KCl, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 2.5 mmol/L KH2PO4, 0.1% BSA and 20 mmol/L HEPES at pH 7.2) and the mitochondria allowed to equilibrate for 2 min. This was followed by the sequential additions of: (1) complex I substrates (5 mmol/L pyruvate and 2.5 mmol/L malate) to initiate the state II respiratory state; (2) two boli of 150 μmol/L ADP to initiate the state III respiratory rate for 2 min; (3) 2 μmol/L oligomycin to monitor the state IV respiration rate for an additional 2 min; (4) 2 μmol/L FCCP to measure the uncoupled respiratory rate (state V) for another 2 min; (5) rotenone (1 μM) to completely block complex I-driven respiration; and (6) 10 mmol/L succinate to activate complex II-driven respiration. The respiratory control ratio (RCR) was calculated by dividing state III oxygen consumption (the respiratory rate in the presence of ADP, second bolus addition) by state IV oxygen consumption (the respiratory rate in the presence of oligomycin). Mitochondria were prepared freshly and used immediately for each experiment.
Slot-blotting measurement of oxidative damage markers in isolated mitochondria
Mitochondrial protein from different treated groups (control, SIN-1 (5 μM) alone and SIN-1 (5 μM)+ Tempol (5 μM)) was used for quantitative measurement of mitochondrial oxidative damage. 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) and 4-HNE were applied as markers for protein nitration and lipid peroxidation by using the slot-blot apparatus as previously described [3,4,16–18,25]. In all, ~2 μg of mitochondrial protein was transferred to a 0.2 μm nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) by slot-blot apparatus (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). The slot was loaded with 2 μg of mitochondrial protein and 300 μL TBS and the mitochondrial proteins were then filtered through the membrane by gravity. For detection of protein tyrosine nitration, a rabbit polyclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Milford, MA) was used (1:2000) for 2 h at room temperature. For detection of 4-HNE, a rabbit polyclonal anti-HNE antibody (Alpha Diagnostics International) was used (1:5000). IR-Dye 800CW goat anti-rabbit antibody was applied as the secondary antibody (1:5000; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) in the dark for 1 h. The intensity of the bands was then detected and quantified by using the Li-Cor Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska). On all blots, a blank slot without any mitochondrial protein was employed to correct for non-specific binding. The value of the blank was background-subtracted from the values for all the other samples.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the STATVIEW package (JMP software, Cary, NC). All results are expressed as means ± SEMs. Data were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) first, if the ANOVA revealed a significant effect, post-hoc analysis was carried out by using the Student-Neuman-Keuls (SNK) test. A difference was considered significant at p < 0.05.
Results
Peroxynitrite donor SIN-1 impairs spinal cord mitochondrial complex I—driven respiration
We first investigated the ability and potency of exogenous PN (SIN-1) to cause mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction in isolated healthy spinal cord (SC) mitochondria. Ficoll-purified SC mitochondria (30–35 μg) were suspended in respiration buffer and pre-treated with different concentrations (1, 2.5, 5 and 10 μM) of PN donor SIN-1. The representative respiratory traces in Figure 2A demonstrate the dose-dependent alterations of SC mitochondrial respiratory rates after exposure to different concentrations of SIN-1. With the increase of SIN-1 dosage, SC mitochondrial respiration was compromised and the oxygen consumption was decreased progressively. At a dosage of 10 μM SIN-1, mitochondrial function was severely impaired with little response to substrates as shown in the representative respiratory traces. Figure 2B displays the dose response analysis of SIN-1-induced mitochondrial dysfunction by the quantification of the RCR, which is the ratio of state III to state IV oxygen consumption rates and is considered as a sensitive measure of how well the electron transport is coupled with ADP phosphorylation. One-way ANOVA showed treatments produced a significant effect in terms of the RCR across all groups [F(4,16) = 24.026; p < 0.0001]. Mitochondria isolated from the SC tissue of healthy animals were found to be metabolically intact and well coupled (RCR > 6.0). Pre-treatment of mitochondria with PN donor SIN-1 for 5 min resulted in a progressive decrease in RCR compared with that in the untreated mitochondria (control group). Data are presented as means ± SEMs; *p < 0.0001 compared with control as determined by one-way ANOVA and the Student-Neuman-Keuls post-hoc test.
Figure 2.
(A) The representative oxymetric traces show the progressive deterioration in SC mitochondrial bioenergetics following exposure to different dosages of SIN-1 (1–10 μM). (B) Compared to the control group, all SIN-1 treated groups result in significant decreases of RCR and SIN-1 induced mitochondrial dysfunction is dose-dependent (*p <0.0001 vs control by SNK).
Quantification of mitochondrial bioenergetics (Figure 3) showed significant, but not dose-related, increases in state II respiration after SIN-1 exposure at all tested concentrations (*p < 0.001 vs control). State III (RCR numerator, the rate in the presence of ADP) and complex I driven-state V (uncoupled in the presence of FCCP) showed significant dose-related decreases with increasing SIN-1 concentration. In contrast, state IV respiration (RCR denominator, the rate in the presence of the ATP synthase inhibitor oligomycin) was increased by SIN-1 (*p < 0.001 vs control), suggesting the compromised coupling of ETC and ATP production. Therefore, the dose-dependent decrease of RCR shown in Figure 2B was attributable to the simultaneous decrease of State III and increase of State IV following SIN-1 exposure.
Figure 3.
Quantification of all respiratory states of SIN-1 induced mitochondrial dysfunction. SIN-1 resulted in significant increases of State II and IV respiration and decreases of State III and Complex I-driven State V respiration, suggesting the occurrences of mitochondrial uncoupling and dysfunction after SIN-1 exposure (*p < 0.0001 vs control by SNK).
Tempol partially protects spinal cord mitochondria from PN-induced respiratory dysfunction
We then carried out a dose–response analysis of the ability of tempol pre-treatment to antagonize SIN-1(PN)-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. The concentration of SIN-1 we applied was 5 μM since at this level the impaired RCR is closest to the mitochondrial RCR 24 h following SCI [4,18,27]. In attempting to titrate the optimal dosage of tempol, five concentrations (1.25, 2.5, 3.75, 5, 10 μM) were employed for an analysis of its protective effects against SIN-1. As demonstrated in Figure 4, one-way ANOVA shows that tempol treatment produced a significant effect across all groups [F(6,18) = 30.043, p < 0.0001]. Post-hoc analysis then revealed that pre-treatment with tempol at concentrations of 2.5, 3.75, 5 and 10 μM significantly increased the RCR compared to the SIN-1 (5 μM) alone group (#p < 0.001, n = 5), showing a partial preservation of mitochondrial respiration. However, the mean RCR was lower at 10 μM than it was at 5 μM, indicative of a U-shaped dose–response curve. Additionally, in all tempol-treated groups, the RCR remained significantly suppressed when compared to the control untreated mitochondria (*p < 0.001). We also tested whether the addition of tempol alone to the isolated SC mitochondria causes any alterations in mitochondrial respiratory states. Pre-incubation of isolated SC mitochondria with 0.5, 1.0, 5 or 10 μM concentrations of tempol did not cause any changes in mitochondrial respiratory rates (data not shown).
Figure 4.
Tempol pre-treatments, starting from 2.5 μM to 10 μM, effectively antagonized SIN-1 induced (5 μM) mitochondrial dysfunction in terms of RCR. This protective effect is partial and shows a U-shaped dose–response (*p <0.0001 vs control; #p <0.001 vs SIN-1 alone treated group by SNK).
As indicated in Figure 5, quantification of all the respiratory states showed that 5 μM tempol, but not lower or higher concentrations, significantly improved state III (RCR numerator) (#p < 0.001, n = 5). In all tempol-treated groups, there was a downward trend in the SIN-1 increased state IV respiration (RCR denominator) compared to SIN-1 alone, but no significant differences were detected. However, the state IV rate was not significantly higher than control after tempol concentrations at or above 2.5 μM. As for the SIN-1 attenuation of the State V respiratory rate, 3.75 μM tempol treatment produced a significant increase compared to the SIN-1 alone group (#p < 0.001). However, in regards to the tempol effects on States III and V, an inverted U-shaped dose–response curve was seen, although not observed for States II and IV.
Figure 5.
Quantification of the respiratory states showed that 5 μM tempol significantly improved state III respiration and 3.75 μM tempol significantly increased Complex I-driven State V respiration (*p <0.0001 vs control; #p <0.001 vs SIN-1 alone treated group by SNK).
Tempol protects spinal cord mitochondria against PN-induced 3-NT formation
In a separate set of experiments, we determined the oxidative damaging effects of the previously demonstrated mitotoxic concentration of SIN-1 (5 μM) in spinal cord mitochondria. As shown in Figure 6A, 5 min of exposure of the mitochondria to 5 μM SIN-1 produced a significant increase in 3-NT formation, as measured by immunoblotting. The representative slot blots (Figure 6A) show that SIN-1 pre-treatment dramatically increased 3-NT immunoreactivity in SC mitochondrial protein and tempol (5 μM)-pre-treatment almost completely blocked the SIN-1-induced formation of 3-NT. Densitometric quantification of the blots (Figure 6B) showed that the PN donor SIN-1 significantly increased 3-NT level in SC mitochondria, with a 6-fold increase compared to the control group (*p < 0.0001 vs control, n = 6). Tempol pre-treatment effectively prevented SIN-1-induced 3-NT formation in SC mitochondria, by significantly decreasing the level when compared to the SIN-1 alone group (#p < 0.0001 vs SIN-1 alone group, n = 6). This effect is considered complete since there is no significant difference between the control and tempol treated mitochondria.
Figure 6.
(A) Immuno-blotting results showed tempol effectively opposed SIN-1 induced 3-NT formation, suggesting its PN-scavenging properties (*p <0.0001 vs control by SNK). (B) No statistical differences were detected among all treated group in terms of 4-HNE production.
Although 5 min incubation of SIN-1 induced 3-NT formation in mitochondrial protein, it had no effects on the LP marker 4-HNE. The representative blots demonstrated (Figure 6B) that the 4-HNE levels in mitochondrial proteins were similar among all groups. A basal level of 4-HNE formation could be detected in control untreated mitochondrial protein, indicating the existence of LP-modifications in healthy spinal cord mitochondria. No evidence of elevated 4-HNE was observed in mitochondrial treated with SIN-1 alone or after SIN-1 plus tempol treated groups.
Discussion
In the current study, application of SIN-1 to isolated healthy rat spinal cord mitochondria produced rapid impairment of mitochondrial respiratory function. Specifically, there was a dose-dependent decrease of the RCR that was attributable to the simultaneous decrease of State III and increase of State IV respiratory rates following SIN-1 exposure. In a similar fashion, others have reported that there is a significant elevation in state IV respiration after three sequential additions of 200 μM peroxynitrite to isolated mitochondria [28]. Therefore complex I-driven mitochondrial respiration was sensitively affected by SIN-1 exposure, supporting the notion that the complex I component of the ETC is a selective target for PN-mediated oxidative damage as previously documented [12,13,20,28,29]. The effects of tempol were associated with an increase in 3-NT levels in the mitochondrial proteins, but not in the levels of the LP byproduct 4-HNE.
The detrimental effects of SIN-1 on the RCR, the complex I-driven States II, III, IV and V were only partially inhibited by tempol pre-treatment, while at the same time tempol completely blunted the increase in 3-NT. More specifically, for State III, the protective effect of tempol was dose-related up to 5 μM and for State V it was dose-related up to 3.75 μM. Above these concentrations, the efficacy decreased. While the current results do not definitively explain the partial protection of respiratory function in contrast to the complete attenuation of the increased 3-NT or the inverted U-shaped dose response, the explanation may be based upon tempol's demonstrated ability to divert nitration toward another potentially damaging oxidative damage mechanism, nitrosation [22]. Thus, while tempol can prevent PN-induced nitration, it may be countered somewhat by a simultaneous increase in nitrosation which becomes more pronounced at higher tempol concentrations resulting in an inverted U-shaped dose–response curve at the higher tempol concentrations in regards to States III and V.
It has been well established that mitochondrial dysfunction and free radical damage are important pathological events following acute CNS injury [1–4,17,30–35]. Recent studies from our laboratories strongly suggest that the principal ROS involved in the secondary damage after CNS injury is PN [16,17,24,25,35,36]. The mitochondrion is both a major source of post-traumatic PN formation and a vulnerable target of its free radical-mediated damaging effects [3,4,10–12,28,29,37]. PN-associated reactions modulate mitochondrial function in various pathways including, but not limited to, inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport [37], inactivation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex [38] and inhibition of mitochondrial NADH:ubiquinone reductase activity [13]. Inactivation of mitochondrial electron-transport enzymes also increases the leakage of and hydrogen peroxide generated by the mitochondria, which may further contribute to cellular injury, in an additive or synergistic fashion [39].
Peroxynitrite anion (ONOO–) is formed by the diffusion-limited combination of •NO and with a rate constant on the order of 109 or 1010 mol/s [6,39]. The PN anion is largely protonated at physiological pH to form peroxynitrous acid (ONOOH), which undergoes homolytic decomposition and generation of the highly reactive nitrogen dioxide radical (•NO2) and hydroxyl radical (•OH) [40]. In a more physiologically relevant condition, PN will react with carbon dioxide (CO2) to form nitrosoperoxocarbonate () which homolytically decomposes to generate •NO2 and carbonate radical (•CO3) [41,42]. It is widely accepted that the potent oxidizing ability of PN is actually due to its decomposition free radicals. The PN-derived •OH, •NO2, and can initiate LP cellular damage by attacking polyunsaturated fatty acids or cause protein carbonylation by reacting with susceptible amino acids [42]. Additionally, •NO2 can nitrate the 3-position of tyrosine residues in proteins and thereby inactivate important components of mitochondrial electron transport chain and disrupt tyrosine signalling pathways [13,28,43].
The understanding of the importance of PN in post-traumatic mitochondrial dysfunction provides a promising therapeutic target for acute treatment after CNS injury. Increasing evidence has shown that compounds which interfere with PN-mediated reactions such as uric acid [44], FeTSPP [45] and tempol [18,25,27] can protect spinal cord tissue from secondary injury after SCI. In the present study, we provided direct evidence that tempol, which has also been shown to have protective effects in traumatic [23,24,46] and ischemic [15] brain injury models, is probably exerting its beneficial effects through scavenging of PN-derived radicals [31]. Although tempol is a well-documented neuroprotective nitroxide, its neuroprotective effects have been previously attributed to its superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimicry [20,46]. However, other studies have shown that tempol can catalytically decompose the PN-derived free radicals •NO2 and [22]. This latter property is probably reflected in the decrease in 3-NT, a specific marker for PN formation, in tempol-treated spinal cord mitochondria, suggesting a linkage between tempol's mitochondrial protection and scavenging of PN-derived free radicals.
Although this mechanistic relationship has been partially confirmed by investigating PN-mediated oxidative damage and the protective effects of tempol in brain mitochondria [20], the current study has more completely examined the responses of spinal cord mitochondria to exogenous PN. Comparing our current results with spinal cord mitochondria to previous studies with brain mitochondria [20], it appears that spinal cord mitochondria are as much as five times more sensitive to PN delivered via SIN-1. In the case of spinal cord mitochondria, a 1 μM concentration is sufficient to attenuate the RCR while, in brain mitochondria, a 5 μM concentration was required [20]. Likewise, twice as much tempol (5 μM) was required to maximally protect against SIN-1 damage to spinal mitochondria compared to brain mitochondria in which 2.5 μM was the optimal protective concentration. These differences are consistent with reports of physiological differences in the mitochondria isolated from different organs or sub-regions [47–49]. More to the point, there are intrinsic differences between brain and spinal cord mitochondria, with the latter producing significantly more oxygen radicals during respiration [21]. Thus, spinal cord mitochondria may be more sensitive to PN due to the fact that they are chronically exposed to a greater degree of background oxidative stress.
It was surprising to us that exposure of isolated normal, healthy spinal cord mitochondria to PN delivered via SIN-1 caused rapid protein nitration-related, but not LP-derived, 4-HNE-mediated protein modification. In in vivo neurotrauma models, LP has been conclusively demonstrated to be a significant oxidative damage mechanism [30–34]. However, in the present experiments, the brief 5 min exposure of SC mitochondria to PN was probably too short to allow LP to progress sufficiently to generate enough 4-HNE to measurably increase the protein-bound levels assessed by immunoblot. In isolated brain mitochondria, we [20] similarly observed only a non-significant increase in 4-HNE in contrast to a statistically significant increase in 3-NT formation after 5 min exposure to SIN-1. Thus, for both brain and SC mitochondria, it appears that the initial PN-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction is mainly attributable to PN-mediated nitration. Indeed, PN-induced nitration has been extensively studied as a crucial mechanism underlying the PN's toxicity [42,50,51]. For example, it is known that nitration is involved in the PN-induced inactivation of Mn superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), therefore amplifying mitochondrial injury by depleting this important anti-oxidant defense mechanism [50]. Furthermore, recent data has revealed that another important mitochondrial target for PN is cytochrome c. Nitration of cytochrome c results in a marked increase in its peroxidase activity, which may exacerbate the oxidative damage to mitochondrial proteins and membranes after PN exposure [43,51].
In summary, the protective effects of tempol on mitochondrial respiration were accompanied by a decrease in 3-NT, strongly suggesting that the beneficial effects of tempol we observed in vivo, including attenuation of oxidative damage, mitochondrial dysfunction and cytoskeletal degradation [27], resulted from direct scavenging of PN-derived free radicals.
Acknowledgements
Support for this study was provided by a grant from the Kentucky Spinal Cord & Head Injury Research Trust (KSCHIRT #6-5) and 5P30 NS051220.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
References
- 1.Xiong Y, Peterson PL, Verweij BH, Vinas FC, Muizelaar JP, Lee CP. Mitochondrial dysfunction after experimental traumatic brain injury: combined efficacy of SNX-111 and U-101033E. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:531–544. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lifshitz J, Sullivan PG, Hovda DA, Wieloch T, McIntosh TK. Mitochondrial damage and dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. Mitochondrion. 2004;4:705–713. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2004.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Singh IN, Sullivan PG, Deng Y, Mbye LH, Hall ED. Time course of post-traumatic mitochondrial oxidative damage and dysfunction in a mouse model of focal traumatic brain injury: implications for neuroprotective therapy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:1407–1418. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sullivan PG, Krishnamurthy S, Patel SP, Pandya JD, Rabchevsky AG. Temporal characterization of mitochondrial bioenergetics after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:991–999. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Beckman JS, Beckman TW, Chen J, Marshall PA, Freeman BA. Apparent hydroxyl radical production by peroxynitrite: implications for endothelial injury from nitric oxide and superoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:1620–1624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.4.1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huie RE, Padmaja S. The reaction of no with superoxide. Free Radic Res Commun. 1993;18:195–199. doi: 10.3109/10715769309145868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Salgo MG, Bermudez E, Squadrito GL, Pryor WA. Peroxynitrite causes DNA damage and oxidation of thiols in rat thymocytes [corrected]. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;322:500–505. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1995.1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Salgo MG, Stone K, Squadrito GL, Battista JR, Pryor WA. Peroxynitrite causes DNA nicks in plasmid pBR322. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;210:1025–1030. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Szabo C. DNA strand breakage and activation of poly-ADP ribosyltransferase: a cytotoxic pathway triggered by peroxynitrite. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;21:855–869. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(96)00170-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Szabo C, Ischiropoulos H, Radi R. Peroxynitrite: biochemistry, pathophysiology and development of therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:662–680. doi: 10.1038/nrd2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Radi R, Peluffo G, Alvarez MN, Naviliat M, Cayota A. Unraveling peroxynitrite formation in biological systems. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001;30:463–488. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(00)00373-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cassina A, Radi R. Differential inhibitory action of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite on mitochondrial electron transport. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996;328:309–316. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.0178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Riobo NA, Clementi E, Melani M, Boveris A, Cadenas E, Moncada S, Poderoso JJ. Nitric oxide inhibits mitochondrial NADH:ubiquinone reductase activity through peroxynitrite formation. Biochem J. 2001;359:139–145. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3590139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Radi R, Cassina A, Hodara R. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite interactions with mitochondria. Biol Chem. 2002;383:401–409. doi: 10.1515/BC.2002.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cuzzocrea S, McDonald MC, Mazzon E, Siriwardena D, Costantino G, Fulia F, Cucinotta G, Gitto E, Cordaro S, Barberi I, De Sarro A, Caputi AP, Thiemermann C. Effects of tempol, a membrane-permeable radical scavenger, in a gerbil model of brain injury. Brain Res. 2000;875:96–106. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02582-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deng Y, Thompson BM, Gao X, Hall ED. Temporal relationship of peroxynitrite-induced oxidative damage, calpain-mediated cytoskeletal degradation and neurodegeneration after traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2007;205:154–165. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.01.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xiong Y, Rabchevsky AG, Hall ED. Role of peroxynitrite in secondary oxidative damage after spinal cord injury. J Neurochem. 2007;100:639–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04312.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Patel SP, Sullivan PG, Pandya JD, Rabchevsky AG. Differential effects of the mitochondrial uncoupling agent, 2,4-dinitrophenol of the nitroxide antioxidant, tempol, on synaptic or nonsynaptic mitochondria after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res. 2009;87:130–140. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hogg N, Darley-Usmar VM, Wilson MT, Moncada S. Production of hydroxyl radicals from the simultaneous generation of superoxide and nitric oxide. Biochem J. 1992;281:419–424. doi: 10.1042/bj2810419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Singh IN, Sullivan PG, Hall ED. Peroxynitrite-mediated oxidative damage to brain mitochondria: protective effects of peroxynitrite scavengers. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85:2216–2223. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sullivan PG, Rabchevsky AG, Keller JN, Lovell M, Sodhi A, Hart RP, Scheff SW. Intrinsic differences in brain and spinal cord mitochondria: Implication for therapeutic interventions. J Comp Neurol. 2004;474:524–534. doi: 10.1002/cne.20130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carroll RT, Galatsis P, Borosky S, Kopec KK, Kumar V, Althaus JS, Hall ED. 4-Hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (Tempol) inhibits peroxynitrite-mediated phenol nitration. Chem Res Toxicol. 2000;13:294–300. doi: 10.1021/tx990159t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hillard VH, Peng H, Zhang Y, Das K, Murali R, Etlinger JD, Zeman RJ. Tempol, a nitroxide antioxidant, improves locomotor and histological outcomes after spinal cord contusion in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1405–1414. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Deng-Bryant Y, Singh IN, Carrico KM, Hall ED. Neuroprotective effects of tempol, a catalytic scavenger of peroxynitrite-derived free radicals, in a mouse traumatic brain injury model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:1114–1126. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xiong Y, Hall ED. Pharmacological evidence for a role of peroxynitrite in the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2009;216:105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.11.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brown MR, Sullivan PG, Dorenbos KA, Modafferi EA, Geddes JW, Steward O. Nitrogen disruption of synaptoneurosomes: an alternative method to isolate brain mitochondria. J Neurosci Meth. 2004;137:299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xiong Y, Hall ED. Pharmacological evidence for a role of peroxynitrite in the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2009;216:105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.11.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brookes PS, Land JM, Clark JB, Heales SJR. Peroxynitrite and brain mitochondria: evidence for increased proton leak. J Neurochem. 1998;70:2195–2202. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70052195.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Murray J, Taylor SW, Zhang B, Ghosh SS, Capaldi RA. Oxidative damage to mitochondrial complex I due to peroxynitrite: identification of reactive tyrosines by mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:37223–37230. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305694200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Braughler JM, Hall ED. Central nervous system trauma and stroke. I. Biochemical considerations for oxygen radical formation and lipid peroxidation. Free Radic Biol Med. 1989;6:289–301. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(89)90056-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kontos HA. Oxygen radicals in CNS damage. Chem Biol Interact. 1989;72:229–255. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(89)90001-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hall ED, Andrus PK, Yonkers PA. Brain hydroxyl radical generation in acute experimental head injury. J Neurochem. 1993;60:588–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb03189.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lifshitz J, Friberg H, Neumar RW, Raghupathi R, Welsh FA, Janmey P, Saatman KE, Wieloch T, Grady MS, McIntosh TK. Structural and functional damage sustained by mitochondria after traumatic brain injury in the rat: evidence for differentially sensitive populations in the cortex and hippocampus. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:219–231. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000040581.43808.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hall E, Springer JE. Neuroprotection and acute spinal cord injury: a reappraisal. NeuroRx: J Am Soc Exp NeuroTher. 2004;1:80–100. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.1.1.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hall ED, Detloff MR, Johnson K, Kupina NC. Peroxynitrite-mediated protein nitration and lipid peroxidation in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:9–20. doi: 10.1089/089771504772695904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hall ED, Kupina NC, Althaus JS. Peroxynitrite scavengers for the acute treatment of traumatic brain injury. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999;890:462–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08025.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Radi R, Rodriguez M, Castro L, Telleri R. Inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport by peroxynitrite. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994;308:89–95. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1994.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Martin E, Rosenthal RE, Fiskum G. Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex: metabolic link to ischemic brain injury and target of oxidative stress. J Neurosci Res. 2005;79:240–247. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Free radicals in biology and medicine. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; Oxford, United Kingdom: 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Radi R, Beckman JS, Bush KM, Freeman BA. Peroxynitrite-induced membrane lipid peroxidation: the cytotoxic potential of superoxide and nitric oxide. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991;288:481–487. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90224-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Denicola A, Freeman BA, Trujillo M, Radi R. Peroxynitrite reaction with carbon dioxide/bicarbonate: kinetics and influence on peroxynitrite-mediated oxidations. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996;333:49–58. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.0363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Radi R. Nitric oxide, oxidants, and protein tyrosine nitration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:4003–4008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307446101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cassina AM, Hodara R, Souza JM, Thomson L, Castro L, Ischiropoulos H, Freeman BA, Radi R. Cytochrome c nitration by peroxynitrite. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:21409–21415. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M909978199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Scott GS, Cuzzocrea S, Genovese T, Koprowski H, Hooper DC. Uric acid protects against secondary damage after spinal cord injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:3483–3488. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500307102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Genovese T, Mazzon E, Esposito E, Muia C, Di Paola R, Bramanti P, Cuzzocrea S. Beneficial effects of FeTSPP, a peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst, in a mouse model of spinal cord injury. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;43:763–780. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Beit-Yannai E, Zhang R, Trembovler V, Samuni A, Shohami E. Cerebroprotective effect of stable nitroxide radicals in closed head injury in the rat. Brain Res. 1996;717:22–28. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01492-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Andreyev AY, Fahy B, Fiskum G. Cytochrome c release from brain mitochondria is independent of the mitochondrial permeability transition. FEBS Lett. 1998;439:373–376. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01394-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Andreyev A, Fiskum G. Calcium induced release of mitochondrial cytochrome c by different mechanisms selective for brain versus liver. Cell Death Differ. 1999;6:825–832. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Friberg H, Connern C, Halestrap AP, Wieloch T. Differences in the activation of the mitochondrial permeability transition among brain regions in the rat correlate with selective vulnerability. J Neurochem. 1999;72:2488–2497. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0722488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.MacMillan-Crow LA, Crow JP, Kerby JD, Beckman JS, Thompson JA. Nitration and inactivation of manganese superoxide dismutase in chronic rejection of human renal allografts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:11853–11858. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Batthyany C, Souza JM, Duran R, Cassina A, Cervenansky C, Radi R. Time course and site(s) of cytochrome c tyrosine nitration by peroxynitrite. Biochemistry. 2005;44:8038–8046. doi: 10.1021/bi0474620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






