Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2009 Oct 19;106(44):18447–18451. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907541106

Nitrogen management is essential to prevent tropical oil palm plantations from causing ground-level ozone pollution

C N Hewitt a,1, A R MacKenzie a, P Di Carlo b, C F Di Marco c, J R Dorsey d, M Evans e, D Fowler c, M W Gallagher d, J R Hopkins f, C E Jones f, B Langford a, J D Lee f, A C Lewis f, S F Lim g,2, J McQuaid e, P Misztal c, S J Moller f, P S Monks h, E Nemitz c, D E Oram i, S M Owen c, G J Phillips c, T A M Pugh a, J A Pyle j, C E Reeves i, J Ryder c, J Siong c, U Skiba c, D J Stewart i,3
PMCID: PMC2763883  PMID: 19841269

Abstract

More than half the world's rainforest has been lost to agriculture since the Industrial Revolution. Among the most widespread tropical crops is oil palm (Elaeis guineensis): global production now exceeds 35 million tonnes per year. In Malaysia, for example, 13% of land area is now oil palm plantation, compared with 1% in 1974. There are enormous pressures to increase palm oil production for food, domestic products, and, especially, biofuels. Greater use of palm oil for biofuel production is predicated on the assumption that palm oil is an “environmentally friendly” fuel feedstock. Here we show, using measurements and models, that oil palm plantations in Malaysia directly emit more oxides of nitrogen and volatile organic compounds than rainforest. These compounds lead to the production of ground-level ozone (O3), an air pollutant that damages human health, plants, and materials, reduces crop productivity, and has effects on the Earth's climate. Our measurements show that, at present, O3 concentrations do not differ significantly over rainforest and adjacent oil palm plantation landscapes. However, our model calculations predict that if concentrations of oxides of nitrogen in Borneo are allowed to reach those currently seen over rural North America and Europe, ground-level O3 concentrations will reach 100 parts per billion (109) volume (ppbv) and exceed levels known to be harmful to human health. Our study provides an early warning of the urgent need to develop policies that manage nitrogen emissions if the detrimental effects of palm oil production on air quality and climate are to be avoided.

Keywords: air quality, land use change, sustainable development, biofuel


Ground-level ozone (O3) is a priority air pollutant that damages human health, plants, and materials, reduces crop productivity, and has direct and indirect effects on the Earth's climate system (1). It is formed in the atmosphere by reactions involving oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the presence of sunlight. The terrestrial biosphere is a major source of both these families of trace gases; in fact, the great majority of reactive VOCs globally are of biogenic origin (2). Here we show, using integrated and fully comprehensive measurements of biosphere-to-atmosphere trace gas fluxes and atmospheric composition, together with atmospheric chemistry modeling, that conversion of tropical rainforest to oil palm plantations results in much greater emissions of these reactive trace gases that lead to O3 formation. Increased NOx emissions will cause severe ground-level O3 pollution (> 100 ppbv), but this pollution could be prevented by strict control of emissions of reactive nitrogen species to the atmosphere. Our study shows the importance of quantifying the current and future effects of land use change on air quality when assessing the “environmental friendliness” of palm oil and other biofuel crops. Of course, air quality is only a single consideration; in assessing the consequences of biofuel production, effects on greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, deforestation, biodiversity, water pollution and freshwater availability, and food prices and food security are all important (3); these factors are not considered here. Specifically, our study provides an early warning of the urgent need to develop policies that manage nitrogen emissions to the atmosphere from the tropics if the detrimental effects of palm oil production on air quality and climate are to be avoided.

Results

Our study comprises a truly integrated and fully comprehensive set of biosphere-to-atmosphere flux measurements, atmospheric composition measurements, and atmospheric chemistry modeling in the tropics for 2 distinct but contiguous land use types. The project was based in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, during April through July 2008. Our measurements (Table 1) show that emissions of VOCs from the rainforest and oil palm plantation landscapes are dominated by emissions of isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene). On a land area basis, isoprene emissions from the plantation (27 tonnes of isoprene per km2 per year) are 5 times greater than from the rainforest. Isoprene and other VOC emission rates depend, in part, on leaf temperature (4). Temperatures were higher at the oil palm site than at the rainforest site (campaign averages 27.9 °C and 25.7 °C, respectively), but this difference in temperature explains only 7% of the observed difference in isoprene emission rates; the remainder is the result of the higher biogenic VOC emission rates from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) trees (5) compared with rainforest tree species. Isoprene has a 5 times greater potential for photochemical ozone creation than the weighted average of VOC compounds emitted by urban anthropogenic activity (6). After normalizing for this difference in VOC reactivity, the effective emissions of VOCs from the oil palm canopy per unit land area exceed those of a typical European city, such as London (7).

Table 1.

Fluxes of isoprene, monoterpenes, reactive oxides of nitrogen, and nitrous oxide

Site Isoprene: flux at the canopy scale (10.00–16.00 h) (mg/m2/h) Monoterpenes: flux at the canopy scale (10.00–16.00 h) (mg/m2/h) Reactive oxides of nitrogen: flux from soils (00.00–24.00 h) (mg N/m2/h) Reactive oxides of nitrogen: flux at the landscape scale, inferred from model (00.00–24.00 h) (mg N/m2/h) Nitrous oxide: flux from soils (00.00–24.00 h) (mg N2-O–N/m2/h)
Rainforest Mean 1.55 ± 0.39 0.38 ± 0.20 0.14 ± 0.115 0.009 0.036 ± 0.041
Variability 1.22 0.34 0.035 N/A
n 619 619 5509 89
Oil palm plantation Mean 7.77 ± 1.94 0.09 ± 0.20 N/A 0.019 0.051 ± 0.040
Variability 7.68 0.35 N/A
n 164 37 101

Fluxes of isoprene, monoterpenes, reactive oxides of nitrogen, and nitrous oxide from the Bukit Atur rainforest site and the Sabahmas oil palm plantation site, with an estimate of their uncertainty, their temporal variability (calculated as the standard deviation of the 30-min or hourly measurements) and the number of observations (n) on which they are based.

Our observations show that the plantation landscape and associated agro-industrial activities give rise to NOx emissions several (≈2.5) times greater than from the rainforest on a land area basis (Table 1). The 3 major NOx sources responsible for this increase are all linked to agro-industrial activity—vehicle exhaust, combustion at the palm oil processing plant, and substantial soil nitrogen fertilization in the plantations (≈0.5 tonnes of nitrogen per hectare per year). Aircraft measurements of acetylene, a well-established combustion tracer (8), show no significant enhancement in the boundary layer over the plantation landscape compared with the rainforest landscape. This finding is a strong indication that non-combustion sources make the major contribution to the elevated NOx concentrations observed over the plantation landscape. Further corroboration of enhanced denitrification of oil palm plantation soils is given by the N2O emissions from these soils, which are ≈50% larger than those from the rainforest soils (Table 1).

As well as dominating VOC emission flux rates, isoprene is the dominant (> 80%) reactive VOC by atmospheric mixing ratio in both landscapes. The concentrations of isoprene were 2 to 5 times higher over the plantation landscape than over the rainforest (Fig. 1), consistent with the observations of fluxes. The C10 monoterpenes are the second most important group of biogenic VOCs. At both the rainforest and the plantation sites, γ-terpinene, α-pinene, and limonene dominate the emissions and concentrations of the C10 compounds, giving an approximately equal split between more and less reactive monoterpenes (9).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The aircraft flight tracks in the boundary layer for the data averaged in Fig. 2, colored by isoprene concentrations (ppbv). The markers are at 10-s intervals with the 15-s isoprene data merged onto this time stamp. Each marker represents a single measurement, and there are only a small number of instances, mostly around 5.05° North, 117.8° East, where several points overlay each other.

Fig. 2 shows that the differences in emission rates in NOx and isoprene between the rainforest and the oil palm plantations give rise to differences in concentrations throughout the boundary layer and into the free troposphere. Over the rainforest, median boundary layer mixing ratios of NO, NO2, and isoprene were 35, 161, and 767 parts per trillion (1012) by volume (pptv), respectively, and over the plantation the median mixing ratios were 67, 288, and 3870 pptv, respectively. Surprisingly, ozone concentrations were similar over both landscapes in the boundary layer (rainforest: 11 ppbv; oil palm plantation: 12 ppbv). The ozone measurements at the Bukit Atur Global Atmosphere Watch station confirm that our measurement period is typical of the long-term record at this site. However, the concentrations of peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) increased from 6 pptv in the boundary layer over the rainforest to 12 pptv over the plantation landscape, demonstrating enhanced photochemical processing of the increased NOx and VOC emissions and concentrations over the plantations.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Isoprene, ozone, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, peroxyacetyl nitrate, and acetylene measured between 10.00 and 16.00 hours local time at ground sites (2 left columns), from the aircraft flying within the boundary layer (500–800 m above ground level) (2 middle columns), and from the aircraft flying in the free troposphere (3,000–6,000 m above ground level) (2 right columns). The green symbols show data from the rainforest landscape, and the red symbols show data from the oil palm plantation landscape. Symbol boxes show median and quartile values, with the whiskers showing 95th and 5th percentiles. Measurements of NO, NO2, PAN, and acetylene were not made on the ground at the Sabahmas oil palm plantation and therefore do not appear in the figure. Information on sampling frequency and averaging is given in the SI.

To understand current and future ozone levels over these 2 landscapes, we have used the CiTTyCAT box model of atmospheric photochemistry (1012). These computations explore the sensitivity of atmospheric composition in the boundary layer to VOC and NOx emission rates for the calm, nonprecipitating, atmosphere, consistent with conditions during the measurement period.

Fig. 3 shows the model-calculated average boundary-layer ozone concentrations between 10:00 and 16:00 hours as a function of isoprene, monoterpene, and NOx emission rates. The model has been enhanced by the inclusion of monoterpene oxidation to capture the rainforest chemistry. Monoterpenes are not yet generally included in atmospheric chemistry models such as those used in the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (13).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Sensitivity of mean mixed boundary layer ozone concentrations (from 10.00–16.00 hours) to fluxes of isoprene, monoterpenes, and NO, as computed by CiTTyCAT. VOC fluxes are the mean over 10.00–16.00 hours; NO fluxes are the mean over a 24-hour period. The black lines show the rainforest and plantation VOC emission scenarios. The current rainforest and plantation positions are determined by observed VOC emission rates and ozone concentrations.

Although the 2 landscapes currently have different NOx and VOC concentrations, the model predicts similar ozone concentrations, as confirmed by our measurements. The ozone concentrations are similar because ozone production, although driven by increased NO and VOC emissions and oxidation, is moderated here by the rapid sequestering of reactive nitrogen to form organic nitrates that deposit to the surface and by ozone destruction resulting from its direct reaction with monoterpenes.

Fig. 3 also suggests that ozone concentrations at the 2 locations respond quite differently to increasing NOx emissions and concentrations. In both landscapes, NOx concentrations will increase with increasing fossil fuel consumption, associated with industrialization, across the region. Additionally, NOx concentrations will increase in the plantation landscape with increased mechanization, fossil fuel use, and fertilizer application. Total VOC emissions in these landscapes will not be so sensitive to industrialization because of the current large biogenic VOC emission rates (Table 1).

Fig. 4 shows the sensitivity of ozone to NOx concentrations for the VOC emission rates specific to the 2 locations. The nonlinearity in the chemistry becomes more apparent when the model results are presented this way. Our model predicts that ozone concentrations in the rainforest most probably will not exceed 50 ppbv (except by advection of ozone and its precursors from outside the rainforest landscape), irrespective of NOx concentration, whereas in the oil palm landscape ozone concentrations will exceed 100 ppbv when NOx concentrations reach 3–5 ppbv. Such NOx concentrations are currently widely observed in rural areas of Western Europe (14), North America, and Asia (15). Ozone at 100 ppbv has significant detrimental effects on human health and crop yields and enhances global warming through its strong radiative forcing (1).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Sensitivity of daytime (10.00–16.00 hours) average ozone concentration to concentrations of NOx in the boundary layer, for the isoprene and monoterpene emission rates measured at the rainforest and oil palm landscapes, as computed by CiTTyCAT. Each model run has a similar shape but with a different point of inflection, so the solid lines are not always in the centre of the shaded region. Current measured concentrations of NOx and O3 in the rainforest and plantation are marked.

Discussion

Our measurements show that the conversion of rainforest to oil palm plantation substantially increases VOC and NOx emissions and concentrations. The increase in VOC emission rates comes directly from the oil palm plants. The increase in NOx emission rates comes from agro-industrialization, especially from fertilized soils. These differences in emission rate have increased the concentrations of some photochemical pollutants, notably PAN. Fortunately, they have not, to date, increased the ground-level concentrations of the most hazardous photochemical air pollutant, ozone. However, ozone will increase substantially in this region as NOx emissions rise with industrialization and economic development.

The degree to which oil palm production will contribute to poor air quality in the future will depend almost entirely on the emission rates of nitrogen oxides. Although ozone concentrations in the rainforest are predicted to remain below 50 ppbv, regardless of the development path taken with respect to emissions of NOx, there is the potential for ozone concentrations in the plantation landscape to greatly exceed the current World Health Organization 8-hour mean air quality threshold of 50 ppbv. Only stringent controls on emissions to maintain NOx concentrations below those currently observed in rural parts of Western Europe and North America will prevent this increase from occurring. Controlling nitrogen emissions at both the local (plantation) and regional scales is necessary to prevent large-scale palm oil production from having very serious effects on regional air quality. Genetic modification of the oil palm cultivar to extinguish isoprene emissions (as already demonstrated for poplar [ref. 16]) would also avoid ozone air quality exceedances at any NOx concentration (see Fig. 3). Without NOx emissions controls or genetic modification, palm oil production for biofuel and other uses will incur significant future costs in terms of human health effects and crop yield reductions that have yet to be included in sustainability criteria for the industry. The utility of palm oil as an environmentally friendly crop may be therefore severely time-limited.

Methods

The project was based in Sabah, Malaysia, April through July, 2008. Ground-based measurements were performed at the 100-m-high Global Atmosphere Watch tower at Bukit Atur (4° 58′ 49.33″ North, 117° 50′ 39.05″ East, 426 m above sea level) and at the Sabahmas oil palm plantation (5.2° North, 118.45° East), 70 km east-northeast of Bukit Atur. Airborne measurements were made from the Natural Environment Research Council/U.K. Meteorological Office's BAe 146–301 large atmospheric research aircraft, which was based at Kota Kinabalu International Airport. Kota Kinabalu (population 580,000) is the largest city in Sabah and is 250 km northwest of Bukit Atur. Sandakan (population 430,000) and Tawau (population 370,000) are about 100 km north and south of Bukit Atur, respectively. The southern part of Sabah and the adjoining region of Indonesia are largely pristine, and selectively logged, rainforest and local anthropogenic emissions are insignificant. The lowland parts of northern and coastal Sabah are largely oil palm plantations. These plantations are serviced by processing mills, mainly powered by biomass (oil palm husks). No attempt was made to avoid or preferentially to sample the visible mill plumes from the aircraft. The boundary layer was sampled from the aircraft using low-level runs following the terrain, originating above the plantations and terminating above the pristine rain forest. Flying time totaled 68 hours. Measurements included trace gas concentrations and fluxes. Modeling was carried out using the CiTTyCAT box model of atmospheric chemistry. Full details of the measurement and modeling methods used are given in the supporting information (SI).

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments.

We dedicate this paper to the memory of Kate Furneaux, a core member of the OP3 project team, who was killed in a traffic accident while cycling in Leeds on 28 July 2009. We thank the Malaysian and Sabah Governments for their permission to conduct research in Malaysia; the Malaysian Meteorological Department for access to the Bukit Atur Global Atmosphere Watch station and its long-term ozone record; Wilmar International Ltd for access to and logistical support at their PPB Oil Palms Bhd Sabahmas Estate; Waidi Sinun of Yayasan Sabah and his staff, Glen Reynolds of the Royal Society's South East Asian Rainforest Research Programme and his staff, and Nick Chappell and Brian Davison of Lancaster University for logistical support at the Danum Valley Field Centre; the ground staff, engineers, scientists, and pilots of the Natural Environment Research Council/U.K. Meteorological Office's BAe 146–301 large atmospheric research aircraft; Nick Chappell, Gemma Davies, Virginia Nicolas-Perea, and M.H. Phua for drawing and validating Fig. 1; and all the members of the OP3 project team for their support and individual and collective efforts. The work was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council Grants NE/D002117/1 and NE/E011179/1.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0907541106/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.The Royal Society, London. London: The Royal Society; 2008. Science Policy Report 15/08. Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: Future trends, impacts and policy implications. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guenther AB, et al. A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 1995;100:8873–8892. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Howarth RW, Bringezu S. Biofuels: Environmental Consequences and Interactions with Changing Land Use; Proceedings of the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) International Biofuels Project Rapid Assessment; September 22–25 2008; Gummersbach, Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell U Press; 2008. [Accessed 07/01/09]. Available at http://cip.cornell.edu/biofuels/ [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Laothawornkitkul J, Taylor JE, Paul ND, Hewitt CN. Biogenic volatile organic compounds in the Earth system: A Tansley review. New Phytol. 2009;183:27–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02859.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wilkinson MJ, et al. Circadian control of isoprene emissions from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) Plant J. 2006;47:960–968. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Derwent RG, Jenkin ME, Passant NR, Pilling MJ. Photochemical ozone creation potentials (POCPs) for different emission sources of organic compounds under European conditions estimated with a Master Chemical Mechanism. Atmospheric Environment. 2007;41:2570–2579. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Emissions of air pollutants in the UK, National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory. 2009. [Accessed 04/01/09]. Available at http://www.naei.org.uk/
  • 8.Whitby RA, Altwicker ER. Acetylene in the atmosphere: Sources, representative ambient concentrations and ratios to other hydrocarbons. Atmospheric Environment. 1978;12:1289–1296. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Atkinson R, Arey J. Gas-phase tropospheric chemistry of biogenic volatile organic compounds: A review. Atmospheric Environment. 2003;37(S2):197–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wild O, et al. Photochemical trajectory modeling studies of the North Atlantic region during August 1993. J Geophys Res. 1996;10(1):29269–29288. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Evans MJ, et al. Evaluation of a Lagrangian box model using field measurements from EASE (Eastern Atlantic Summer Experiment) 1996. Atmospheric Environment. 2000;34:3843–3863. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Donovan RG, Hope ES, Owen SM, Mackenzie AR, Hewitt CN. Development and application of an urban tree air quality score for photochemical pollution episodes using the Birmingham, United Kingdom, area as a case study. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:6730–6738. doi: 10.1021/es050581y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Denman KL, et al. Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Solomon S, et al., editors. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 2007. pp. 500–587. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tarrason L, Nyiri A, editors. Transboundary Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground Level Ozone in Europe in 2006. Oslo: European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme Status Report 1; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Collins WJ, Stevenson DS, Johnson CE, Derwent RG. Tropospheric ozone in a global-scale 3-dimensional Lagrangian model and its response to NOX emission controls. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry. 1997;26:223–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Behkne K, et al. Transgenic, non-isoprene emitting poplars don't like it hot. Plant J. 2007;51:485–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES