Abstract
A strategy is described for the synthesis of β-(1,3)-GlcA-GlcNAc dimeric and tetrameric glycoclusters through the conjugation of disaccharide groups onto a diaminodiamide aromatic scaffold by reductive amination.
Keywords: disaccharides, hyaluronan, glycomimetic, multivalent
Hyaluronan (HA, 1) is a linear non-sulfated high molecular weight glycosoaminoglycan (GAG) composed of repeating disaccharide units of β-D-glucuronic acid (GlcA) and N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc) linked by alternating β-(1,3) and β-(1,4) glycosidic linkages (Figure 1). HA is found in the extracellular matrix, at the cell surface, inside cells, and has been implicated in a variety biological processes, including inflammation, tumorogenesis, and wound repair.1 Specifically, the unique biophysical and biological properties of HA appear to have a profound influence on the structural integrity, as well as the biomechanical, and physiological properties of the extracellular and pericellular matrix. In the process, HA serves as a template for the assembly of other macromolecules and interacts directly with cell surface receptors (CD44, RHAMM) that influence a number of physiological events, including cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation.2–4 Given the potential significance of therapies based on controlling GAG-protein interactions, the chemical preparation of HA and related analogues remains an area of active investigation. In this regard, it is noteworthy that potent modulators of inflammation,5 chemokine gene expression,6 angiogenesis,7 and tumor growth8 have been derived from low molecular mass HA fragments (3 to 10 disaccharides).
Figure 1.
(A) Polyvalent glycoconjugate-receptor molecular recognition. (B) Structure of the hyaluronan repeat unit (1).
Carbohydrate-protein recognition events, such as those mediated by HA, are often driven by interactions that generate glycoligand-receptor complexes via a glycoside cluster effect (Figure 1).9 As such, the synthesis of multi-antennary saccharide derivatives based upon a variety of multivalent scaffolds including, glycoproteins,10 calixarenes,11 cyclodextrins,12 as well as linear, branched, and dendrimeric polymers,13,14 have been reported.
In continuing our effort in the rational design of multivalent glycoforms,15 we present a convergent strategy for the synthesis of clustered, multivalent HA-mimetics. Our synthetic approach involves three steps: i) the synthesis of an HA-like β-(1,3)-linked disaccharide with a n-pentenyl spacer arm; ii) the generation of conformationally rigid aromatic diamidodiamine scaffold; and iii) the chemical conjugation of the disaccharide to the diamide template via reductive amination.
While, carbohydrate-protein interactions are primarily dominated by hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions, the stacking of aromatic side chains and hydrophobic domains on pyranosyl rings have been reported to play a critical role in enhancing the specificity and stability (enthalpic and entropic contribution) in such interactions.16 For instance, aromatic glycosides bind to concavalin A more strongly than aliphatic ones, indicating the presence of a hydrophobic region in proximity of the carbohydrate-binding site.17 All told, designing an appropriate polyvalent ligand for optimized binding activity is influenced by the nature of the scaffold and the length of the tether between the scaffold and the carbohydrate, as well as by the aglycon itself (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
A biantennary HA-glycoconjugate attached to a conformationally rigid scaffold.
To this end, the rationale for selecting an aromatic diamide scaffold for the assembly of head-to-head HA-derived oligomers was two fold. First, we postulated that glycoligand-protein binding affinity would be further augmented by the potential for secondary hydrophobic and hydrogen-bonding interactions provided, respectively, by the aromatic and amide/amine groups in the short peptide skeleton. In addition, by incorporating different R substituents in the scaffold backbone, the spatial presentation and conformational mobility of the pendant saccharides could be altered as additional structural variables for optimized binding. Second, we envisioned that the incorporation of HA disaccharide epitopes onto a restricted scaffold via a flexible aliphatic linker would minimize direct steric interactions between carbohydrate residues and the diamide scaffold. Since ligand affinity and specificity is often dependant upon the proper spacing and orientation of the carbohydrate residues, we anticipate that such compounds would be able to preorganize and fold into a conformation suitable for facilitating clustering, while concomitantly promoting protein-protein interactions to a greater degree than monovalent counterparts. Structure-based design of such clustered analogues with distinct pharmacophoric sugar recognition domains can easily be screened and could provide a mechanism to facilitate receptor recognition resulting in the identification of binding agonists or inhibitors (Figure 2).
Based on our initial assessment,15a the general methodology for the synthesis of n-pentenyl terminated glycoside acceptor 8 is summarized in Scheme 1. Initially, the azido group was incorporated at the 2-position of D-glucosamine hydrochloride using triflic azide (TfN3) followed by acetylation affording the 2-azido-2-deoxy-3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-glucopyranosyl acetate 4.18 Selective hydrolysis of the anomeric acetate to the hydroxyl group 5 was performed using hydrazine acetate, which was then converted to the activated imidate derivative 6 in 74% yield. The installation of the n-pentenyl group as a spacer at the C-1 anomeric position was accomplished using catalytic amount of TMSOTf as a promoter at 0°C. Deacetylation of the mixture using NaOMe subsequently realized the triol 7 in 80% yield. Benzylidenation of 7 with benzaldehyde dimethylacetal in the presence of a catalytic amount of camphorsulfonic acid yielded the corresponding n-pentenyl glycoside acceptor 8 (α:β = 70:30 mixture), which served as the key building block for generating β-(1,3) linked HA disaccharide-like glycoclusters. The α- and β-isomers were separated using column chromatography and the β-isomer (8b) was further elaborated. The glucuronic acid imidate donor served as the other glycosylating coupling partner and was synthesized in 50% yield in two steps from commercially available acetobromo-α-D-glucuronic acid methyl ester 9 (Scheme 2).15a Specifically, 9 was converted to its corresponding free hemiacetal 10 using CdCO3/H2O, which was subsequently converted to the active α-imidate derivative 11 using trichloroacetonitrile and the initiator 1,8-diazabicyclo [5,4,0] undec-7-ene, as a base. Glycosylation of the n-pentenyl glycoside acceptor 8b with the trichloroacetimidate donor 11 in the presence of a Lewis catalyst TMSOTf afforded the stereospecific β-(1,3) linked disaccharide 12 in 78% yield (Scheme 3).
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of n-pentenyl glycoside acceptor 8b.
Reagents and conditions: (a) i) TfN3, MeOH, DMAP, 25°C, 18 h, ii) Ac2O, pyridine, 0 °C, 10 h, Yield = 75%; (b) H2NNH2.AcOH, DMF, 0°C to 25 °C, 45 min, Yield = 70%; (c) anhydrous K2CO3, CCl3CN, dry CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 48 h, Yield = 74%; (d) i) 4 Å Molecular sieves, TMSOTf, 4-pentene-1-ol, dry CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1 h, ii) MeONa, MeOH, 0 °C to 25 °C, 6 h, Yield = 80% over two steps; (e) camphorsulfonic acid, dry THF, C6H5CH(OMe)2, reflux, 6 h, Yield = 75%.
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of imidate donor 11.
Reaction conditions: (a) CdCO3, H2O (2 eq.), CH3CN, 75 °C, 4 h, Yield = 75%; (b) CCl3CN, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,8-DBU, −10 to 0 °C, 1 h, Yield = 60%.
Scheme 3.
Stereospecic synthesis of HA-mimetic β-(1,3)-linked disaccharide.
Reaction conditions: (a) TMSOTf, CH2Cl2, 0 to 25 °C, 3.5 h, Yield = 78%; (b) CH3COSH, 25 °C, 24 h, Yield = 70%; (c) 3 mL of TFA:H2O (2:1), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1 h, Yield = 86%; (d) 3M NaOH, 9:1 MeOH/H2O, 25 °C, 2 h, Yield = 86%; (e) O3 (−78 °C), then add Me2S, −78 °C to 25 °C, 24 h, Yield = 85%.
Characterization of compound 12 by NMR and FAB-MS spectrum was in agreement with the expected structure. The resonances for the anomeric proton were doublets and had coupling constants consistent with assignment of the β-configuration. For example, 1H NMR of 12 displayed the anomeric protons (H-1 and H-1/) as a doublet at δ 4.78 (J = 8.0 Hz) characteristic of the 1,2-trans system. Reduction of the azido functionality to the acetamido (NHAc) group was performed using thioacetic acid,19 which furnished 13 in appreciable yield (70%).
The 1H NMR spectrum of 13 showed a variable doublet between δ 5.8–6.3 (J = 6.8–9.2 Hz) ppm attributed to the -NH proton of the acetamido group in addition to the -NHCOCH3 peak at 1.94 ppm. Selective removal of the benzylidene protecting group using aqueous TFA gave 14, which was subsequently deesterified and deacetylated using 3M NaOH in MeOH/water (9:1) mixture to yield the completely deprotected disaccharide 15 in 86% yield. The crude product was purified using Sephadex LH-20 with MeOH as the eluant. The synthesized disaccharide fragment obtained is similar to the native β-(1,3) linked region of hyaluronan (1) with a pendant n-pentenyl functionality as a spacer arm at the anomeric position of the GlcNAc moiety (Figure 3). The presence of characteristic signals in the 13C NMR spectrum at δ 173.0 (-COOH), 171.0 (-NHCO) along with resonance signals at δ 138.2 (=CH), 114.1 (=CH2), 103.8 and 101.1 (C-1 and C-1/), 22.0 (-COCH3) ppm further corroborated the formation of compound 15 (FAB-MS [M++2Li–H] = 478.2068).
Figure 3.
1H NMR of a stereospecific HA-mimetic β-(1,3)-linked disaccharide.
The presence of an n-pentenyl group in compound 15 potentially serves as a versatile handle by transformation of the terminal olefin to either an aldehyde, carboxylic acid, ester, thioether, thioester or hydroxyl group.11 To this end, the n-pentenyl disaccharide 15 was subjected to reductive ozonolysis, which afforded a terminal aldehyde glycoside intermediate 16 in 85% yield (Scheme 3). The appearance of the aldehyde signal at δ 9.63 and 201.2 ppm in the 1H and 13C NMR spectrum, respectively, along with the disappearance of the olefinic double bond peaks at δ 5.81 (δc 138.2) and 5.1–4.9 (δc 114.1) from the parent compound confirmed the formation of 16 (FAB-MS [M++Li] = 474.2550).
A diamino diamide scaffold was synthesized for the covalent attachment of the carbohydrate epitopes (Scheme 4). N-Boc-protected phenylalanine amino acid, which was prepared by standard protection methods20 was coupled with o-phenylenediamine in a 2:1 ratio using dicyclohexyl carbodiimide (DCC) as a condensating agent at room temperature to yield the corresponding diamide adduct 19. Subsequently, the carbamate function in 19 was cleaved with a 50% solution of CF3COOH (TFA) in CH2Cl2 to afford the diamino diamide scaffold 20.
Scheme 4.
Synthesis of a diamido diamine scaffold.
Further extension of the four carbon aliphatic glycosyl aldehyde by reductive amination of 16 with 20 not only resulted in the formation of symmetrically branched β-(1,3)-linked HA dimer 21 (28%) as the major product, but also furnished the tetrameric derivative 22 (15%), albeit in low yield.21 Repeated purification of the crude to separate the individual components using Sephadex G-25 was unsuccessful. The complex crude mixture was subsequently purified using C18 reverse phase chromatography using a CH3CN:H2O gradient system in 0.1% TFA (see Supplementary Information). The collected fractions were screened for homogeneity by analytical HPLC (C-18 silica column, 120A μBore) and MALDI-TOF (Figure 4), which confirmed the formation of dimer 21 (M+ 1304.407) and tetramer 22 (M+ 2206.521). Furthermore, the number of sugars grafted onto the scaffold could also be calculated by comparing the resonance signals of the aromatic peaks from the diamino diamide unit with that of the acetamido (NHAc), methylene (CH2), and anomeric peaks of the sugar residues (see Figure 4). For example, the ratio of the relative intensities of ArH:anomeric H:NHAc:CH2 yield a signal ratio of 3.52:1.0:1.48:1.96, indicating the formation of the dimeric ligand 21. As the number of carbohydrates grafted on the scaffold increased, as in the case of tetramer 22, the resonance signals in the proton NMR appeared to broaden with an observed signal ratio of 1.78:1.0:1.52:2.07.
Figure 4.
1H NMR of the dimeric HA-mimetic 21 and MALDI-TOF of the dimeric (21) and tetrameric (22) glycoclusters.
In summary, we have designed and synthesized dimeric and tetrameric HA-mimetic glycoclusters by grafting β-(1,3) GlcA-GlcNAc disaccharides onto an aromatic scaffold. The biological evaluation of these compounds and their potential as novel glycotherapeutics is ongoing.
Supplementary Material
Scheme 5.
Synthesis of HA multidentate glycoclusters.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. J. Pohl, M. Slamova, and P. Svobada (Microchemical Facility, Emory University) for assistance in conducting HPLC.
Footnotes
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE
Experimental procedures and spectral data are provided for compounds 8b, 12–16, and 18–22.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.(a) Lapcik L, Jr, Lapcik L, Smedt S, Demeester J, Chabrecek P. Chem Rev. 1998;98:663–2684. doi: 10.1021/cr941199z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Underhill CB. C Foundation. John Wiley; Chichester, UK: 1989. The Biology of Hyaluronan; pp. 87–106. [Google Scholar]; (c) Laurent TC. The Chemistry Biology and Medical Applications of Hyaluronan and its Derivatives; Portland, London: 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Toole BP. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:335–336. doi: 10.1172/JCI10706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Entwistle J, Hall CI, Turley EA. J Cell Biochem. 1996;61:569–577. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(19960616)61:4<569::aid-jcb10>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Evanko SP, Wight TN. J Histochem Cytochem. 1999;47:1331–1342. doi: 10.1177/002215549904701013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Travis JA, Hughes MG, Wong JM, Wagner WD, Geary RL. Circ Res. 2001;88:77–83. doi: 10.1161/01.res.88.1.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) McKee C, Penno M, Cowman M, Burdick M, Strieter R, Bao C, Noble P. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:2403–2413. doi: 10.1172/JCI119054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) McKee C, Lowenstein C, Horton M, Wu J, Bao C, Chin B, Choi A, Noble P. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:8013–8018. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.12.8013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hodge-Dufour J, Noble P, Horton MR, Bao C, Wysoka M, Burdick MD, Strieter RM, Trinchieri G, Puré E. J Immunol. 1997;15:2492–2500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McKee CM, Penno MB, Cowman M, Burdick MD, Strieter RM, Bao C, Noble PW. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:2403–2413. doi: 10.1172/JCI119054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Lees VC, Fan TP, West DC. Lab Invest. 1995;73:259–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) West D, Hampson I, Arnold F, Kumar S. Science. 1985;228:1324–1326. doi: 10.1126/science.2408340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zeng C, Toole BP, Kinney SD, Kuo JW, Stamenkovic I. Int J Cancer. 1996;77:396–401. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980729)77:3<396::aid-ijc15>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Lundquist JJ, Toone E. J Chem Rev. 2002;102:555–578. doi: 10.1021/cr000418f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mammen M, Choi S, Whitesides GM. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1998;37:2754–2794. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2754::AID-ANIE2754>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Baigude H, Katsuraya K, Okuyama K, Tokunaga S, Uryu T. Macromolecules. 2003;36:7100–7106. [Google Scholar]; (b) Veprek P, Jezek J. J Pept Sci. 1999;5:5–23. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1387(199905)5:5<203::AID-PSC181>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hayashida O, Mizuki K, Akagi K, Matsuo A, Kanamori T, Nakai T, Sando S, Aoyama Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:594–601. doi: 10.1021/ja0275663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Benito JM, Gomez-Garcia M, Mellet C, Baussanne I, Defaye J, Fernandez JM. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;66:7786–7795. [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Kobayashi K, Tsuchida A, Usui T, Akaike T. Macromolecules. 1997;30:2016–2020. [Google Scholar]; (b) Choi SK, Mammen N, Whitesides GM. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:4103–4111. [Google Scholar]; (c) Zanini D, Roy R. J Org Chem. 1998;63:3486–3491. [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Ashton PR, Boyd SE, Brown CL, Jayaraman N, Nepogodiev SA, Stoddart JF. Chem-Eur J. 1996;2:1115–1128. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kensinger R, Yowler B, Benesi A, Schengrund CL. Bioconjugate Chem. 2004;15:349–358. doi: 10.1021/bc034156a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) Iyer SS, Rele SM, Baskaran S, Chaikof EL. Tetrahedron. 2003;59:631–638. [Google Scholar]; (b) Rele SM, Iyer SS, Baskaran S, Chaikof EL. J Org Chem. 2004;69:9159–70. doi: 10.1021/jo049092r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Rele SM, Cui W, Hou S, Barr-Zarse G, Tatton D, Gnanou Y, Esko J, Chaikof EL. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:10132–10133. doi: 10.1021/ja0511974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Iyer SS, Rele SM, Nolan S, Grasa G, Chaikof EL. Chem Comm. 2003:1518–1519. doi: 10.1039/b301734f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Rele SM, Iyer SS, Chaikof EL. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:89–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.05.097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Quiocho FA. Ann Rev Biochem. 1986;55:287–315. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Weis WI, Drickamer K. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:441–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.002301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Miyauchi H, Yuri M, Tanaka M, Kawamura N, Hayashi M. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1997;7:989. [Google Scholar]; (d) Davis BG. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1. 1999:3215–3237. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Poretz RD, Goldstein I. J Biochem Pharmacol. 1971;20:2727. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(71)90182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vasella A, Witzig C, Chiara JL, Martin-Lomas M. Helv Chim Acta. 1991;74:20732077. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jacquinet JC. Carbohydrate Res. 1990;199:153–181. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(90)84259-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Greene TW, Wuts PG. Protecting Groups in Organic Synthesis. 3. Chapter 7. Wiley; New York: 1999. p. 494. [Google Scholar]
- 21.A small percentage (< 5%) of mono and tri functionalized glycoligands could also be observed in the MALDI-TOF spectrum of the crude mixture, however no attempts were made to purify the compounds.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.