Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2009 Mar 24;48(11):2310–2320. doi: 10.1021/bi900044e

Biomimetic Chemistry of Iron, Nickel, Molybdenum, and Tungsten in Sulfur-Ligated Protein Sites

Stanislav Groysman 1, R H Holm 1,*
PMCID: PMC2765533  NIHMSID: NIHMS94512  PMID: 19206188

Abstract

Biomimetic inorganic chemistry has as its primary goal the synthesis of molecules that approach or achieve the structures, oxidation states, and electronic and reactivity features of native metal-containing sites of variant nuclearity. Comparison of properties of accurate analogues and these sites ideally provides insight into the influence of protein structure and environment on intrinsic properties as represented by the analogue. For polynuclear sites in particular, the goal provides a formidable challenge for, with the exception of iron-sulfur clusters, all such site structures have never been achieved and few even closely approximated by chemical synthesis. This account describes the current status of the synthetic analogue approach as applied to the mononuclear sites in certain molybdoenzymes and the polynuclear sites in hydrogenases, nitrogenase, and carbon monoxide dehydrogenases.

Synthetic Analogues

A strategy of demonstrated value in the study of protein-bound metal sites is the synthetic analogue or biomimetic approach defined by the protocol of Figure 1 (1). As developed and implemented in this laboratory, this approach has as its objective the preparation and detailed characterization of relatively small molecules that simulate or achieve the coordination sphere, composition, stereochemistry, and oxidation states of the native metal mononuclear or polynuclear site. A structural analogue allows deduction of site characteristics common to the site and itself by property comparisons. A functional analogue supports substrate transformations to products as do enzymes, although not necessarily at the same rate or with the same stereochemistry. A functional analogue is not inevitably a structural analogue, but a high-fidelity structural analogue should be a functional analogue provided a protein environment is not obligatory to reactivity. The approach is iterative in order to improve as necessary the accuracy of a site analogue. Here we describe the current status of selected biomimetic chemistry of four metals (Fe, Ni, Mo, W) in relation to proteins that are the objects of widespread contemporary interest: molybdenum and tungsten oxotransferases and hydroxylases, iron and nickel-iron hydrogenases, iron-sulfur proteins, molybdenum-copper and nickel-iron-sulfur carbon monoxide dehydrogenases, and nitrogenase. The sites in these proteins exhibit a range of metal nuclearities and have the common features of variable oxidation states and sulfur-rich coordination environments. Space limitations do not allow detailed accounts of enzyme reactions and mechanisms, protein structure, and inclusion of all meritorious results in site modeling. The emphasis is on the native sites themselves and recent synthetic inorganic chemistry directed toward meaningful analogues of those sites. More extensive accounts of the biomimetic chemistry of protein sites are available (2,3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the synthetic analogue approach to metallobiomolecule active sites. The arrow on the left signifies repetition of the process leading to an improved analogue.

Molybdenum/Tungsten Oxotransferases and Hydroxylases

These enzymes catalyze overall reaction [1] in which generalized substrate X/XO is converted to product XO/X by addition or removal of one oxygen atom whose ultimate source is water (4-7). Current interpretation of function derives substantially from more than thirty crystal

X+H2OXO+2H++2e [1]

structures of enzymes that catalyze over a dozen different reactions. Molybdoenzymes are effectively organized under the Hille classification, which is partly based on the structures of oxidized (MoVI) active sites and includes the DMSOR,1 SO, and XOR families (4). Active site structures in the DMSOR family (Figure 2) contain two pyranopterindithiolate(2-) cofactor ligands as in distorted trigonal prismatic {MoVIO(L)(S2pd)2} with L = OSer (1, DMSOR) (8), SCys (2, dissimilatory NiR) (9), and SeCys (3, FDH) (10,11). Although FDH catalyzes the process HCO2 ↔ CO2 + H+ + 2e- and not reaction [1], it is placed in the DMSOR family because of site structural similarity. Also shown are the tungstoenzyme sites {WIV(OH2)(SCys)(S2pd)2} of acetylene hydratase (4) (12) and {WVI(SH)(SeCys)(S2pd)2} of FDH (5) (13). Sites in the SO and XOR families contain one cofactor ligand (Figure 3) and include the oxidized sites {MoO2(SCys)(S2pd)} of chicken liver and plant SO (6) (14,15), {MoO2S(S2pd)} of quinoline 2-oxidoreductase (7) (16), and a substrate complex of the milk XOR site (8) (17). The wealth of structural information from crystallography and X-ray absorption spectroscopy is the single most important factor leading to the development of active site analogues. The cofactor ligand functions in the ene-1,2-dithiolate form (Figure 2), the terminal reduced member of the dithiolene class of prototypical non-innocent ligands that encompasses the oxidation states (R2C2S2)2-,1-,0 (18). Biomimetic research focuses on the chemistry of mononuclear complexes in the physiological oxidation states MIV,V,VI.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Oxidized active site structures in the molybdoenzyme DMSOR family: 1, DMSO reductase (R. sphaeroides, 1.3 Å resolution, PDB code 1EU1, one conformation) (8); 2, dissimilatory nitrate reductase (D. desulfuricans, 1.9 Å resolution, PDB code 2NAP) (9); 3, formate dehydrogenase N (E. coli, 1.6 Å resolution, PDB code 1KQF) (10). Tungsten enzymes: 4, acetylene hydratase (P. acetylenicus, 1.26 Å resolution, PDB code 2E7Z) (12); 5: formate dehydrogenase (D. gigas, 1.8 Å resolution, PDB code 1H0H) (13). The pyranopterindithiolate cofactor ligand is depicted in the box (R = nucleotide).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Oxidized active site structures in the molybdoenzyme SO and XOR families: 6, sulfite oxidase (chicken liver, 1.9 Å, PDB code 1SOX) (14); 7, quinoline-2-oxidoreductase (P. putida, 1.8 Å resolution, PDB code 1T3Q) (16); 8, reaction intermediate of xanthine oxidoreductase and 2-hydroxy-6-methylpurine, 2.3 Å, PDB code 3B9J) (17)

Of the many non-dithiolene ligand platforms employed, several have proven especially useful (Figure 4). Complexes of tridentate hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate 9 with variable substituents R have been valuable in disclosing fundamental properties of molybdenum and tungsten in physiological oxidation states (19,20), albeit not in coordination environments closely similar to enzyme sites. As examples, species such as 10 execute the minimal oxygen atom transfer reaction [2] with disclosure of mechanistic details (21), and support proton-coupled electron transfer reactions and a catalytic cycle (22) that parallels the enzymatic cycle; another variant sustains the uncommon cis-MoVIOS fragment (23) found in the XOR family. Bidentate ligand 11 illustrates the concept of steric suppression of nonphysiological reaction [3], allowing reaction 2 with components 12 and 13 and

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ligands and complexes in biomimetic molybdenum/tungsten chemistry: tridentate hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate(1-) 9 and an MoVIO2 complex 10 (L variable), bidentate 2-pyridyldiphenylmethanethiolate(1-) (11) and its sterically encumbered MoVIO2 (12) and MoIVO (13) complexes, and dithiolate ligands 14.

MoIVO+XOMoVIO2+X [2]
MoIVO+MoVIO2OMoVOMoVO [3]

a wide variety of substrates to proceed without complication (24). Dithiolate ligands 14 closely simulate the structural and electronic features imposed by the cofactor ligand. Three common and useful types are shown, of which 14a is most like the natural ligand. Substituent variation alters electron density at the sulfur atoms and modulates redox potentials.

Structural Analogues

Efficient syntheses afford analogues of reduced (desoxo MoIV) and oxidized (monooxo MoVI) sites in the DMSOR family (Figure 5) (20,25-28). The mdt ligand has not been isolated as a stable salt but is accessible by the indicated ligand transfer reaction to form the M = Mo/W dicarbonyl complexes 15. The labile carbonyl groups are displaced to yield the terminal oxo/sulfido complexes 16, the η2-carboxylates 17, and square pyramidal species 18, which are also obtainable from 17 with silylthio or silylseleno reagants. To assure stable mononuclear structures, complexes 18 are prepared with sterically bulky R-substituents. The scheme is completed by oxo transfer reactions with XO = Me3NO or Ph3AsO to give monooxo complexes 19 and by a sulfur atom transfer reaction to afford 20. These complexes can be isolated only with tungsten. As is the case here, MoVI complexes are often unstable to autoreduction in anionic sulfur ligand environments. Because isoligated complexes of MoVI/WVI are always isostructural and practically isometric, the approach has afforded structural analogues 19 of three oxidized sites in the DMSOR family and one analogue 20 of a tungstoenzyme site (compare Figure 2). Further, complexes 18 are analogues of reduced sites, 17 (M = Mo) is a representative of the site of a membrane-bound NiR of E. coli (29), and Mo=S complex 16 models the formate-reduced site in a reinterpretation of the mechanism of E. coli FDHH (30). Analogue complexes are unprotonated versions with M=Q rather than the M-QH groups often found in enzyme sites.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Synthesis of unprotonated analogues of reduced (17, 18) and oxidized (19) active sites of three members of the DMSOR family (M = Mo; Q = O, S, Se). Complex 20 is an analogue of the oxidized site in W-FDH. Reduced analogues have square pyramidal structures and oxidized analogues and 17 adopt six-coordinate structures distorted toward trigonal prismatic geometry.

Structural analogues of oxidized sites of the SO and XOR families have been synthesized utilizing dithiolate 14c (Figure 6). A sequence of substitution reactions yields 21, an analogue of the SO site in which an hindered thiolate simulates conserved cysteinate in site 6 (31). In seeking XOR site analogues, WVI complexes have again been used because of the redox instability of MoVI. Removal of oxo ligands as siloxane from tungstate precursors leads to 22, an analogue of an oxidized inactive site, and 23, an analogue of the site in oxidized active enzymes (32). Native sites are often protonated, a condition simulated for structural purposes by silylation to give 24 and 25. Protonated species have not yet been isolated. Complex 23 is a long-sought structural analogue with a single basal sulfido ligand, as in native site 7, a position maintained upon reduction by substrate to the (probable) MoIV state in 8.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Synthetic schemes leading to structural analogues of the active sites of members of the SO (21) and XOR (23) families. Complex 22 represents an inactive site and 24 and 25 monoprotonated inactive and active sites, respectively, in the XOR family.

Accurate analogues present structures unmodified by a protein environment. Superposition of analogue (19, 21-25) and oxidized protein site structures reveal near-congruency in most cases, with weighted rms deviations in atom positions of ≤0.30 Å (31-33). Protein interactions evidently do not cause major perturbations of intrinsic structures as represented by analogue complexes in their crystal lattices.

Functional Analogues

Certain of the preceding complexes manifest reductase activity with biological substrates (Figure 7). Complexes 18 cleanly reduce substrate in atom transfer reactions analogous to those of DMSOR and trimethylamine N-oxide, nitrate, and selenate reductases (20,27,28), albeit at much slower rates. The MoVIO analogues of 19 were generated as reaction products but not isolated. Reactions are second order with associative transition states; activation parameters for the reduction of (CH2)4SO by [Mo(OPh)(mdt)2]1- in acetonitrile (k2298 = 1.5 × 104 M-1s-1) are typical: ΔH = 10 kcal/mol, ΔS = -39 eu. These reactions exhibit a small kinetic metal effect, k2W/k2Mo ≈ 6-30, in the reduction of constant substrate. A related effect observed with molybdenum and tungsten isoenzymes is intrinsic to the metals, and is associated with the periodic behavior of isostructural and isoelectronic couples of the two metals. These reactions simulate the oxo atom transfer step in a single turnover of an enzyme. In a functional NiR analogue system, oxo transfer reaction [5] is coupled to equilibrium reaction [4] in dichloromethane with the result that Michaelis-Menton saturation kinetics are followed (34).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Schematic representation of functional reductase analogue reaction systems for S-oxides, N-oxides, nitrate, and selenate.

[MoIV(SR)(PPh3)(mnt)2]1[MoIV(SR)(mnt)2]1+PPh3 [4]
[MoIV(SR)(mnt)2]1+NO3[MoVIO(SR)(mnt)2]1+NO2 [5]

Molybdenum and tungsten dithiolene complexes form the basis for systems in which both accurate structural and suitably functional analogues have been realized, an ultimate but infrequently achieved goal in synthetic analogue chemistry. Functional analogues refer to oxotransferases that are reductases. However, the picture will remain incomplete pending the development of oxidase analogue systems. One such system has been briefly described in relation to arsenite oxidase (35). As yet there are no effective systems for substrates of the XOR family. These enzymes are hydroxylases that utilize MoVI-OH units as base-activated nucleophiles in the reaction pathway rather than metal sites as oxygen atom donors or acceptors (6).

Hydrogenases

Hydrogenases occur in bacteria, archaea, and eukarya and catalyze bidirectional reaction [6]. They consist of two main classes, the [NiFe] (36,37) and [FeFe] (37-39) hydrogenases, so designated because of their active site metal content. A subgroup of the first class is the [NiFeSe] hydrogenases which contain a selenocysteinate in place of a cysteinate ligand. A third class, [Fe] hydrogenases,

H22H++2e [6]

contain mononuclear sites (40) and is not considered here. Synthetic approaches to [NiFe] and [FeFe] enzyme sites require construction of binuclear species and in the latter case, attachment to an Fe4S4 cubane-type cluster. The binuclear site and site fragment structures project an apparent attainability, which together with the importance of the problem, has resulted in extensive activity in site modeling, many aspects of which have been summarized (41-45). We truncate the subject to a small set of attractive developments.

[NiFe] Hydrogenases

A combination of X-ray crystallographic and FTIR studies has led to the formulations 26a for the oxidized site and 27a for the reduced site (Figure 8) (36,37,46,47). For each, a specific structure 26b (48) or 27b (49) is provided. In the oxidized site, X is a generalized bridging ligand, thought to be an oxygenic species as indicated by O in 26b, while in the reduced site the bridging position is vacant or perhaps occupied by hydride. Appropriate initial analogues are heterometal binuclear species containing the (RS)2NiII2-SR)2FeII fragment with Ni-Fe separations of 2.5-2.9 Å and distorted octahedral low-spin FeII coordinated to one carbonyl and two cyanide ligands. A significant portion of synthetic research has focused on mononuclear iron or nickel sites (Figure 9). Among sulfur-ligated species, 28 reproduces Fe(CN)2(CO) coordination at the low-spin FeII site (50), 29 evolves dihydrogen from HCl nearly quantitatively in the overall reaction NiI + H+ → NiII + ½ H2 (51), and 30 catalyzes D2/H+ exchange consistent with enzymatic heterolytic cleavage of D2 or H2 (52). A variety of dinuclear Ni-Fe complexes are accessible by reactions of suitable mononuclear components, as in the formation of 31 (53). This molecule illustrates the feasibility of the NiII2-SR)2FeII bridge fragment, low-spin FeII in the unit Fe(SR)2(CN)2(CO)2, and a NiFe separation near the upper end found in enzyme sites. Complex 32 reveals stabilization of low-spin FeII in a site containing three strong field ligands, and contains a similar bridge fragment with exclusive sulfur coordination at NiII but a considerably longer NiFe distance (3.29 Å) (54). No functional dinuclear NiFe analogues have yet been devised. However, in a variation on a native metal, the FeII(CN)2(CO) unit was replaced by isoelectronic (C6Me6)RuII to give a complex with the bridge NiII2-SR)2RuII incorporating a metal that forms stable dihydrogen complexes. The complex reacts with dihydrogen in water, affording a structurally related dinuclear product augmented with the hydride bridge NiII2-H)RuII and protons released in solution (55). A plausible intermediate in the enzymatic uptake of H2 is site 27a with hydride occupying the vacant bridge position.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Representative hydrogenase active site structures: oxidized [NiFe] (26a) and a specific example (26b, D. vulgaris, 1.4 Å resolution, PDB code 1WUJ) (48); reduced [NiFe] (27a) and a specific example of reduced [NiFeSe] (27b, D. maculatum, 2.15 Å resolution, PDB code 1CC1) (49)

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Mononuclear complexes 28-30 and NiFe complex 32, and preparation of NiFe complex 31.

[FeFe] Hydrogenases

The active sites of these enzymes are termed H-clusters and exist in three oxidation levels, air-oxidized inactive (FeIIFeII), oxidized-active (FeIIFeI), and reduced-active (FeIFeI) with proposed oxidation states indicated. The structure of an oxidized-active site 33 (Figure 10) (56) reveals a dinuclear Fe22-CO)(μ2-SR)2(CO)2(CN) fragment containing the dithiolate SCH2XCH2S (in which atom/group X = CH2, NH, or O is not definitely identified) linked by an Fe(μ2-SCys)Fe bridge to an Fe4S4 cluster. The iron sites are six-coordinate and that distal to the cysteinate bridge contains an aquo ligand. The problem reduces to synthesis of a suitable dinuclear fragment and attachment through an unsupported bridge to the Fe4S4 cluster.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Structure of the H-cluster of an [FeFe] hydrogenase in the oxidized active form (33, C. pasteurianum, 1.4 Å resolution, PDB code 3C8Y) (56). In the dinuclear fragment, the carbonyl bridge is slightly asymmetric (Fe-C 1.91, 1.96 Å) and the Fe-Fe distance (2.55 Å) is consistent with direct metal-metal interaction.

Approaches to the dinuclear fragment often begin with the Seyferth anion [FeI2S2(CO)6]2-, which is readily dialkylated to [Fe2(SR)2(CO)6] (57), thereby generating a core structure closely related to that in 33. Structures with variable X and substitution of cyanide or tertiary phosphine for carbonyl have been achieved in extensive modeling studies (41,43). Carbon monoxide, cyanide, and phosphine have the common properties of π-acid behavior and stabilization of low oxidation states. In one example of structural modeling (Figure 11), dithiolate cluster 34 undergoes CO substitution to place the phosphines in 35 at the positions of cyanide in 33, followed by oxidation to yield the FeIIFeI product 36 with an asymmetric carbonyl bridge (58). An approach to the entire H-cluster framework is represented by the reaction of 1:3 subsite-differentiated cluster 37 (59) with functionalized 38 to afford a product whose physicochemical properties have been interpreted in terms of the assembly 39 in which cluster and dinuclear unit are linked by an unsupported Fe(μ2-SR)Fe bridge (60). The viability of the structure is supported by DFT calculations which indicate the FeIFeI and [Fe4S4]2+ oxidation levels. The H-cluster model and certain dinuclear species are catalysts for electrochemical dihydrogen evolution at strongly reducing potentials (61) while another FeIFeI complex activates dihydrogen photochemically in the form of an FeIIFeII dihydride (62).

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Reactions leading to a models of the dinuclear fragment (36) and the entire framework (39) of the H-cluster.

Iron-Sulfur Proteins

These proteins are of widespread occurrence at all levels of life and are implicated in electron transfer and other multifarious functions (63,64). Clusters with rhomboidal Fe2S2 (40,41) (65,66), cuboidal Fe3S4 (42) (67), and cubane-type Fe4S4 (43) (68) cores (Figure 12) are ubiquitous and exist in at least two oxidation states necessary for redox behavior. Analogues of the 40, 43, and the {Fe(SCys)4} site in rubredoxins (not shown) were prepared at the very beginning of biomimetic inorganic chemistry, and were followed later by an analogue of 42. Different core oxidation states are achieved by appropriate choice of FeII,III reactants in synthesis or by redox reactions of isolated clusters. The development and accomplishments of iron-sulfur analogue chemistry and a summary of synthetic methods affording iron-sulfur clusters are available (69,70). In analogue clusters, terminal cysteinate ligation is a simulated by organic thiolates. Despite the advanced state of iron-sulfur analogue chemistry, several problems, including the complicated clusters of nitrogenase and carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (vide infra) remain, while progress has been made on two others, the Rieske cluster and the fully reduced Fe4S4 cluster of the Fe protein of nitrogenase.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Structures of the clusters {Fe2S2(SCys)4} (40, Anabaena, 1.2-1.3 Å resolution, PDB code 1CZP) (65), {Fe2S2(SCys)2(NHis)2} (41, S. acidocaldarius, 1.1 Å resolution, PDB code 1JM1) (66), {Fe3S4(SCys)3} (42, P. furious, 1.5 Å resolution, PDB code 1SJ1) (67), and {Fe4S4(SCys)4} (43, B. thermoproteolyticus, 0.9-1.0 Å resolution, PDB code 1IQZ) (68).

Rieske proteins function in electron transport and contain cluster 41, differentiated from the more common Fe2S2 cluster 40 by the presence of two ImHis ligands (71). Reaction of [Fe2S2Cl4]2-with o-xylyldithiolate and the dilithium salt of 2,2′-bis(methylindolyl)phenylmethane affords the FeIIIFeIII complex 44 (Figure 13), having the same ligation pattern as 41 (72). It undergoes a reversible one-electron reduction at a potential ca. 150 mV less negative than [Fe2S2(S2-o-xyl)2]2-, an accurate analogue of 40, and exhibits a rhombic EPR spectrum similar to that of a reduced (FeIIIFeII) Rieske center. Potentials of proteins with cluster 40 are more negative than those of Rieske proteins, which encompass the range -150 to +400 mV vs. SHE, a variability largely due to electrostatic effects (73). Reduction of 44 apparently occurs at the FeN2S2 site, as for Rieske centers. Although this cluster is not an exact analogue of a Rieske cluster owing to binding of two anionic nitrogen ligands rather than neutral imidazoles, it is the closest approach yet to the native cluster itself.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

The oxidized Rieske cluster analogue 44 and the preparation of all-ferrous analogue 45 of the fully reduced cluster in the Fe protein of nitrogenase.

Cubane-type clusters 43 are the most widely dispersed of all iron-sulfur species and are well known in proteins and analogue molecules in the electronically delocalized core oxidation states 3+, 2+, and 1+ of redox series [7] in which adjacent members are interconverted by one-electron transfer. The proposal that the Fe protein of nitrogenase might utilize the [Fe4S4]2+/1+;1+/0 couples in delivering electrons to the catalytic site of nitrogenase was followed by definite proof of the existence of the [Fe4S4]0 oxidation state in the fully reduced Fe protein (74,75). These results render an isolable

[Fe4S4]0[Fe4S4]1+[Fe4S4]2+[Fe4S4]3+4Fe2+3Fe2++Fe3+2Fe2++2Fe3+Fe2++3Fe3+ [7]

all-ferrous analogue a significant objective. The first such species was isolated from the substitution reaction of [Fe4S4(PPri3)4]1+ with cyanide in the presence of the strong reductant [Ph2CO]• - (76). However, [Fe4S4(CN)4]4-, while in the desired oxidation state, was intensely unstable to oxidation and difficult to manipulate. Use of a N-heterocyclic carbene as a strong σ-donor terminal ligand in a cluster assembly system with an FeII reactant and a soluble sulfide source leads to cluster 45 (Figure 13) (77), which is amenable to study. Its 57Fe isomer shift and comparative structural parameters are fully consistent with an all-ferrous formulation. Further, the magnetic Mössbauer and integer spin EPR spectra of 45 disclose the unusual spin ground state S = 4 (78), also found for the fully reduced native Fe protein (74) where it is unique in biology. The synthetic cluster is a meaningful analogue of the protein-bound [Fe4S4]0 cluster, providing further evidence that magnetic properties arise from interactions within the core and are not strongly influenced by terminal ligation (here SCys vs. C). The two all-ferrous clusters complete the synthesis of isolable analogues of all known biological oxidation states of Fe4S4 clusters.

Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenases

These enzymes occur in aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and archaea and catalyze the reversible interconversion of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in reaction [8] at two very different types of catalytic sites. Cu-Mo CODH occurs in aerobic organisms (79) while Ni-Fe CODHs are found in anaerobic organisms (80-82). The enzymes are highly significant agents in global carbon cycling. Synthetic analogue chemistry of their catalytic sites is at an early stage.

CO+H2OCO2+2H++2e [8]

Mo-Cu CODH

The oxidized site 46 (MoVI/CuI, Figure 14) (83) resembles site 7 in the XOR family (Figure 3) with the inclusion of a CuI-SCys fragment bound to the basal sulfido ligand. Two synthetic approaches to the site have emerged (Figure 15). Reaction of a CuI triazamacrocyclic complex with a six-coordinate MoVOS complex 47 results in displacement of acetonitrile and formation of assembly 48 (84). This species establishes the synthetic viability of an unsupported MoV-S-CuI bridge based on an initially terminal sulfido ligand; metric features (Mo-S 2.284 Å, Cu-S 2.135 Å, Mo-S-Cu 118.9 °, MoCu 3.74 Å) resemble those of site 46. Further, EPR spectra and DFT calculations establish that unpaired electron density extends to the CuI site. While this complex lacks dithiolate binding simulating the cofactor ligand, it provides another example of the utility of the hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate ligand platform in stabilizing a structural element of a molybdoenzyme site. A second relevant reaction affords the square pyramidal MoVI complex 49 that incorporates the enzyme site features of an apical oxo atom, basal dithiolate coordination, and basal sulfido coordination to CuI (85). However, it departs from 46 with two sulfido ligands which form mutually supported bridges to CuI. Complexes 23 and 25 (Figure 6) offer the possibility of a single basal sulfido bridge in square pyramidal coordination as in 46 but with a non-native metal. The reactivity of these species with CuI is currently under investigation in this laboratory.

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Oxidized active site structure of Cu-Mo CODH (46, O. carboxidovorans, 1.1 Å resolution, PDB code 1N5W) (83); CuMo 3.74 Å, Mo-S 2.27 Å, Cu-S 2.21 Å, Cu-SCys 2.22 Å, Mo-S-Cu 113°, S-Cu-S 156°. The reduced site (MoIV/CuI) has the same structure with small differences in parameters except for the Mo-S-Cu angle and the MoCu distance which increase by about 10° and 0.5 Å, respectively.

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Synthetic routes to bridged complexes 48 and 49 having certain structural elements in common with Mo-Cu CODH site 46.

Ni-Fe CODH

Structures of the catalytic sites, termed C-clusters and depicted generally by 50 which subsumes actual structures 51 and 52 (Figure 16), have the common features of a cubanoid NiFe3S4 core with an approximately planar nickel site and a tetrahedral FeII site bridged to the core by atom/group X and a μ3-S atom. Construction of a site analogue can be proposed in two steps: synthesis of the NiFe3S4 core containing planar NiII, followed by binding of FeII to the cluster through the μ2-S atom axial to NiII and a Ni-X-Fe bridge. The conversion of previously prepared cubane-type cluster 53 (86) to 54 and 55 by substitution with strong-field in-plane ligands involves spin-pairing with a concomitant tetrahedral (S = 1) → planar (S = 0) NiII structural change and creation of a μ2-S atom axial to the nickel site (Figure 17) (86, 87). This accomplishes the first step. The structure of the C-cluster of CODH from C. hydrogenoformans (1.1 Å resolution) was interpreted in terms of an X = S bridge (89), prompting the introduction of a dithiolate ligand in 55 which might sustain a sulfur bridge to external FeII. More recently, the crystal structure of recombinant CODH maintained at fixed redox potentials revealed C-clusters of the same overall structure but with X = OH/OH2 in 51 and X = CO2 in 52 (Figure 16) after treatment with NaHCO3 at a lower potential (90). This and other evidence indicates that the bridge in the active enzyme does not contain sulfide. The central feature of a structure-based mechanism involves nucleophilic attack by an FeII-OH group on the carbon atom in NiII-CO. The bridge unit NiII-OH/OH2-FeII is unknown in any synthetic species. Consequently, the second step in creating a C-cluster remains a formidable challenge.

Figure 16.

Figure 16

Generalized structure 50 of the Ni-Fe CODH sites 51 and 52 (C. hydrogenoformans, 1.4-1.5 Å resolution, PDB code 3B52) (90).

Figure 17.

Figure 17

Synthesis of cubanoid clusters 54 and 55 by ligand substitution of 53. The 3 LS notation refers to the tridentate thiolate ligand in cluster 37 (Figure 11).

Nitrogenase

The nitrogenase complex catalyzes the six-electron reduction reaction [9] with simultaneous dihydrogen evolution, and consists of an α2-Fe protein with an Fe4S4 cluster bound between subunits and an α2β2-MoFe protein containing two clusters in each αβ subunit (91,92). The P-cluster is

N2+6H++6e2NH3 [9]

located at the αβ interface and the cofactor cluster FeMoco is placed within the α subunit. The path of electron flow is most likely Fe4S4 → P-cluster → FeMoco; the substrate is bound and reduced at the cofactor cluster by a pathway yet to be defined. Synthetic attempts directed at the P-cluster (56) and FeMoco (57) (Figure 18) (93-95), the two most complicated and synthetically formidable metalloclusters in biology, commenced well before 1992 when the first crystallographic results at atomic resolution became available. The topological relationship between the two clusters is evident from comparison 58. The P-cluster contains a μ6-S interior atom within a Fe62-SCys)2 cavity and FeMoco an interstitial μ6-X atom (X = C, N, O) (95) within a Fe62-S)3 cage. We describe here certain encouraging developments. More extensive accounts of work in this laboratory are available (96,97).

Figure 18.

Figure 18

Structures of the P-cluster 56 and FeMoco 57 (A. vinelandii MoFe protein; 2.0 and 1.2 Å resolution; PDB codes 2MIN, 1M1N) of nitrogenase (93, 95) and a comparison 58 of cluster topologies.

Biomimetic cluster synthesis is based on three conceptual strategies (96,97): (i) self-assembly--self-organizing synthesis of clusters from simple mononuclear metal precursors and ligand reagents (the cornerstone approach for cluster synthesis); (ii) fragment condensation--coupling of pre-existing di- or polynuclear clusters or a cluster with a mononuclear reactant to give higher-nuclearity clusters of (in theory) predictable structures; (iii) core conversion--reorganization of a pre-existing cluster to a different core geometry by means of redox reactions, changes in ligand set, or reaction with an external reagent, usually a ligand nucleophile. All have proven useful in biomimetic research; (i) and (iii) are illustrated below.

Heterometal cubane-type clusters with [MFe3S4]z cores, including those with M = Mo and V, have been prepared by procedures (i) and (ii) (97). A sequence of reactions has been devised based on these single cubane clusters leading to the all-ferrous edge-bridged double cubanes 59 (98). The clusters, which are attractive precursors because of their high nuclearity, undergo core conversion upon reaction with hydrosulfide in acetonitrile to afford the clusters 60 (99,100). These clusters feature a prominent μ6-S interior atom, an overall connectivity pattern identical to 56, and map closely upon the native P-cluster with rms deviations in atom positions of 0.33-0.38 Å (97). The clusters 60 are first topological analogues of the P-cluster. They are not chemical models because of the presence of heterometals and μ2-S rather than thiolate bridges. Earlier, the same topology had been achieved in larger and less tractable clusters in which P-type units were connected by sulfide bridges (101,102).

An exceptional result has been obtained by cluster self-assembly in a system containing an FeII precursor with strongly basic ligands, two thiols which when deprotonated function as exceptionally capacious ligands, and elemental sulfur in toluene (Figure 19) (103). Product cluster 61 (28% yield) was isolated; it was also obtained in an assembly system not requiring prior isolation of the dinuclear intermediate. A second cluster with (Me3Si)2N in a doubly bridging position was formed in slight amount. The toluene solvent promotes the formation of a neutral cluster in a redox-buffered reaction system containing oxidant (sulfur) and reductants (FeII, thiolate) which generates a product with 5FeII + 3FeIII. Remarkably, 61 manifests the FeMoco topology but with μ2-SR/R* bridges rather than sulfide and sulfide rather than X as the interstitial atom. In addition to achieving the desired topology, the results demonstrate for the first time the formation of an iron-sulfur cluster with an atom interstitial to a trigonal prismatic Fe6 cage. Taken together, clusters 60 and 61 and the methods affording them presage continued progress toward the goal of accurate synthetic analogues of the P-cluster and FeMoco.

Figure 19.

Figure 19

Synthetic reactions affording topological analogues of the P-cluster (60) and cofactor cluster (61) of nitrogenase.

Prospects

A perspective on biomimetic research of metallosites as presented here is offered by an earlier commentary from this laboratory (96). “Traditionally, synthetic inorganic chemistry has provided the molecular intuition needed to interpret metal behavior in biological systems. Today, in a reversal of circumstance, metallobiomolecules are posing fundamental inorganic questions whose answers lie outside our existing knowledge. It is a fitting symmetry that the relationship between inorganic chemistry and biology has come full circle. Equally important, these [synthetic] efforts have also contributed broadly to basic areas of inorganic chemistry that would probably not have been examined otherwise; the intrinsic value of such exploration should not be underestimated.” Given the progress thus far and the growing sophistication of biomimetic methodologies, it may be anticipated that the unachieved structural analogues of the polynuclear sites set out here will be realized. The value of analogues as structural guides or determinants (Figure 1) is diminishing as the power and productivity of crystallography and spectroscopic methods flourish.

Two additional aspects of research in this field continue apace. One is the daunting challenge of analogue systems capable of enzymatic transformations using chemical apparatus as faithful to native catalysts as possible. While an operative pathway can be won only from an enzyme itself, interrogation of analogue systems can show what is possible, among which may be the actual mechanism. It remains to be learned whether diverse functional analogues operative outside of a protein and suitable for disclosure of mechanistic information can be created. Another aspect is synthesis. While experimental protocol may not be the same, the intent differs not at all from the total synthesis of organic natural products and its contribution to biosynthetic pathways. Such work is intended not only to reach targets but also may contribute to the broad and developing area of biosynthesis of metallocenters (104) by showing what synthetic routes are feasible in the absence, and possibly in the presence, of proteins. Problems in metallocenter assembly, whether in vivo or by chemical synthesis, are at the forefront of contemporary metallobiochemistry. One need look no further than the current state of understanding of the biosynthetic pathway of FeMoco (105,106) for an inspiring example.

Abbreviations (see also Figure 3)

CODH

carbon monoxide dehydrogenase

DMSOR

dimethylsulfoxide reductase

FDH

formate dehydrogenase

FeMoco

iron-molybdenum cofactor

FTIR

Fourier transform infrared

Im

imidazole

L

ligand (generalized)

M

metal (generalized)

Me3tacn

N,N′,N′″-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane

NiR

nitrate reductase

Q

oxygen, sulfur, selenium

S2-o-xyl

o-xylyl-α,α'-dithiolate(2-)

S2pd

pyranopterindithiolate(2-)

SO

sulfite oxidase

XOR

xanthine oxidoreductase

Footnotes

Research in this laboratory is supported by NIH Grant GM 28856 and NSF Grant CHE 00547734.

References

  • 1.Holm RH, Solomon EI. Preface: Biomimetic Inorganic Chemistry. Chem Rev. 2004;104:347–348. doi: 10.1021/cr0206364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Holm RH, Solomon EI, editors. Biomimetic Inorganic Chemistry. Chem Rev. 2004;104(no 2) doi: 10.1021/cr0206364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kraatz HB, Metzler-Nolte N, editors. Concepts and Models in Bioinorganic Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; New York: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hille R. The Mononuclear Molybdenum Enzymes. Chem Rev. 1996;96:2757–2816. doi: 10.1021/cr950061t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schindelin H, Kisker C, Rajagopalan KV. Molybdopterin from Molybdenum and Tungsten Enzymes. Adv Protein Chem. 2001;58:47–94. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(01)58002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hille R. Structure and Function of Xanthine Oxidoreductase. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2006:1913–1926. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schwarz G, Mendel RR. Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis and Molybdenum Enzymes. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:623–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li HK, Temple C, Rajagopalan KV, Schindelin H. The 1.3 Å Crystal Structure of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Dimethylsulfoxide Reductase Reveals Two Distinct Molybdenum Coordination Environments. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:7673–7680. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dias JM, Than ME, Humm A, Huber R, Bourenkov GP, Bartunik HD, Bursakov S, Calvete J, Caldeira J, Carneiro C, Moura JJG, Moura I, Romão MJ. Crystal Structure of the First Dissimilatory Nitrate Reductase at 1.9 Å Solved by MAD Methods. Structure. 1999;7:65–79. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jormakka M, Törnroth S, Byrne B, Iwata S. Molecular Basis of Proton Motive Force Generation: Structure of Formate Dehydrogenase-N. Science. 2002;295:1863–1868. doi: 10.1126/science.1068186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boyington JC, Gladyshev VN, Khangulov SV, Stadtman TC, Sun PD. Crystal Structure of Formate Dehydrogenase H: Catalysis Involving Mo, Molybdopterin, Selenocysteine, and an Fe4S4 Cluster. Science. 1997;275:1305–1308. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5304.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seiffert G, Ullman GM, Messerschmidt A, Schinck B, Kroneck PHM, Einsle O. Structure of the Non-redox-active Tungsten/[4Fe:4S] Enzyme Acetylene Hydratase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:3073–3077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610407104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Raaijmakers H, Macieira S, Dias JM, Texeira S, Bursakov S, Huber R, Moura JJG, Moura I, Romão MJ. Gene Sequence and the 1.8 Å Crystal Structure of the Tungsten-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase from Desulfovibrio gigas. Structure. 2002;10:1261–1272. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00826-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kisker C, Schindelin H, Pacheco A, Wehbi WA, Garrett RM, Rajagopalan KV, Enemark JH, Rees DC. Molecular Basis of Sulfite Oxidase Deficiency from the Structure of Sulfite Oxidase. Cell. 1997;91:973–983. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80488-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schrader N, Fischer K, Theis K, Mendel RR, Schwarz G, Kisker C. The Crystal Structure of Plant Sulfite Oxidase Provides Insights into Sulfite Oxidation in Plants and Animals. Structure. 2003;11:1251–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2003.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bonin I, Martins BM, Purvanov V, Fetzner S, Huber R, Dobbek H. Active Site Geometry and Substrate Recognition of the Molybdenum Hydroxylase Quinoline 2-Oxidoreductase. Structure. 2004;12:1425–1435. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pauff JM, Zhang J, Bell CE, Hille R. Crystal Structure of Enzyme in Reaction with 2-Hydroxy-6-methylpurine. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:4818–4824. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707918200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kirk ML, McNaughton RL, Helton ME. The Electronic Structure and Spectroscopy of Metallo-Dithiolene Complexes. Prog Inorg Chem. 2004;52:111–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Young CG. In: Biomimetic Oxidations Catalyzed by Transition Metal Complexes. Meunier B, editor. World Scientific Publishing Co.; Singapore: 2000. pp. 415–459. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Enemark JH, Cooney JJA, Wang JJ, Holm RH. Synthetic Analogues and Reaction Systems Relevant to the Molybdenum and Tungsten Oxotransferases. Chem Rev. 2004;104:1175–1200. doi: 10.1021/cr020609d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kail BW, Pérez LM, Zaric SD, Millar AJ, Young CG, Hall MB, Basu P. Mechanistic Investigation of the Oxygen-Atom-Transfer Reactivity of Dioxo-molybdenum(VI) Complexes. Chem Eur J. 2006;12:7501–7509. doi: 10.1002/chem.200600269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xiao Z, Bruck MA, Enemark JH, Young CG, Wedd AG. A Catalytic Cycle Related to Molybdenum Enzymes Containing [MoVIO2]2+ Oxidized Active Sites. Inorg Chem. 1996;35:7508–7515. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Doonan CJ, Rubie ND, Peariso K, Harris HH, Knottenbelt SZ, George GN, Young CG, Kirk ML. Electronic Description of the cis-MoOS Unit in Models for Molybdenum Hydroxylases. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:55–65. doi: 10.1021/ja068512m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schultz BE, Gheller SF, Muetterties MC, Scott MJ, Holm RH. Molybdenum-Mediated Oxygen Atom Transfer: An Improved Analogue Reaction System of the Molybdenum Oxotransferases. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:2714–2722. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jiang J, Holm RH. An Expanded Set of Functional Groups in Bis(dithiolene)tungsten(IV,VI) Complexes Related to the Active Sites of Tungstoenzymes, Including WIV-SR and WVI-O(SR) Inorg Chem. 2004;43:1302–1310. doi: 10.1021/ic030301k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang JJ, Kryatova O, Rybak-Akimova EV, Holm RH. Comparative Kinetics and Mechanism of Oxygen and Sulfur Atom Transfer Reactions Mediated by Bis(dithiolene) Complexes of Molybdenum and Tungsten. Inorg Chem. 2004;43:8092–8101. doi: 10.1021/ic040087f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jiang J, Holm RH. Reaction Systems Related to Dissimilatory Nitrate Reductase: Nitrate Reduction Mediated by Bis(dithiolene)tungsten Complexes. Inorg Chem. 2005;44:1068–1072. doi: 10.1021/ic040109y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang JJ, Tessier C, Holm RH. Analogue Reaction Systems of Selenate Reductase. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:2979–2988. doi: 10.1021/ic0521630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bertero MG, Rothery RA, Palak M, Hou C, Lim D, Blasco F, Weiner JH, Strynadka NCJ. Insights into the Respiratory Electron Transfer Pathway from the Structure of Nitrate Reductase A. Nature Struct Biol. 2003;10:681–687. doi: 10.1038/nsb969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Raaijmakers HCA, Romão MJ. Formate-reduced E. coli Formate Dehydrogenase H: the Reinterpretation of the Crystal Structure Suggests a New Reaction Mechanism. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2006;11:849–854. doi: 10.1007/s00775-006-0129-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lim BS, Willer MW, Miao M, Holm RH. Monodithiolene Molybdenum(V,VI) Complexes: A Structural Analogue of the Oxidized Active Site of the Sulfite Oxidase Enzyme Family. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:8343–8349. doi: 10.1021/ja010786g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Groysman S, Wang JJ, Tagore R, Lee SC, Holm RH. A Biomimetic Approach to Oxidized Sites in the Xanthine Oxidoreductase Family: Synthesis and Stereochemistry of Tungsten(VI) Analogue Complexes. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12794–12807. doi: 10.1021/ja804000k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sung KM, Holm RH. Oxo Transfer Reactions Mediated by Bis(dithiolene)tungsten Analogues of the Active Sites of Molybdoenzymes in the DMSO Reductase Family: Comparative Reactivity of Tungsten and Molybdenum. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:1931–1943. doi: 10.1021/ja0036559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Majumdar A, Pal K, Sarkar S. Selectivity of Thiolate Ligand and Preference of Substrate in Model Reactions of Dissimilatory Nitrate Reductase. Inorg Chem. 2008;47:3393–3401. doi: 10.1021/ic7024268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sugimoto H, Tarumizu M, Miyake H, Tsukube H. Bis(dithiolene) Molybdenum Complex that Promotes Combined Coupled Electron-Proton Transfer and Oxygen Atom Transfer Reactions: A Water-Active Model of the Arsenite Oxidase Molybdenum Center. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2008:4494–4497. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lubitz W, van Gastel M, Gaertner W. Nickel Iron Hydrogenases. Met Ions Life Sci. 2007;2:279–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fontecilla-Camps JC, Volbeda A, Cavazza C, Nicolet Y. Structure-Function Relationships of the [NiFe]- and [FeFe]-Hydrogenase. Chem Rev. 2007;107:4273–4303. doi: 10.1021/cr050195z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lemon BJ, Peters JW. Handbook of Metalloproteins. Wiley & Sons Ltd.; Chichester, U.K.: 2001. pp. 738–751. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nicolet Y, Cavazza C, Fontecilla-Camps JC. Fe-only Hydrogenases: Structure, Function, and Evolution. J Inorg Biochem. 2002;91:1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0162-0134(02)00392-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shima S, Pilak O, Vogt S, Schick M, Stagni MS, Meyer-Klaucke W, Warkentin E, Thauer RK, Ermler U. The Crystal Structure of [Fe]-Hydrogenase Reveals the Geometry of the Active Site. Science. 2008;321:572–575. doi: 10.1126/science.1158978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Georgakaki IP, Darensbourg MY. In: Bio-coordination Chemistry. Que L Jr, Tolman WA, editors. Elsevier; Oxford: 2004. pp. 549–568. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bouwman E, Reedijk J. Structural and Functional Models Related to the Nickel Hydrogenases. Coord Chem Rev. 2005;249:1555–1581. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu X, Ibrahim SK, Tard C, Pickett CJ. Iron-only Hydrogenase: Synthetic, Structural, and Reactivity Studies of Model Compounds. Coord Chem Rev. 2005;249:1641–1652. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.van der Vlugt JI, Meyer F. Synthetic Models for the Active Sites of Nickel-Containing Enzymes. Met Ions Life Sci. 2007;2:181–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Canaguier S, Artero V, Fontecave M. Modelling NiFe Hydrogenases: Nickel-Based Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Production. Dalton Trans. 2008:315–325. doi: 10.1039/b713567j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Volbeda A, Fontecilla-Camps JC. Structural Bases for the Catalytic Mechanism of Ni-containing Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenases. J, Chem Soc, Dalton Trans. 2005:3443–3450. doi: 10.1039/b508403b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Volbeda A, Martin L, Cavazza C, Matho M, Faber BW, Roseboom W, Albracht SPJ, Garcin E, Rousset M, Fontecilla-Camps JC. Structural Differences Between the Ready and Unready Oxidized States of [NiFe] Hydrogenases. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2005;10:239–249. doi: 10.1007/s00775-005-0632-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ogata H, Hirota S, Nakahara A, Komori H, Shibata N, Kato T, Kano K, Higuchi Y. Process of [NiFe] Hydrogenase Eludicidated by High-Resolution X-Ray Analysis: Conversion of the Ready to the Unready State. Structure. 2005;13:1635–1642. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Garcin E, Vernede X, Hatchikian EC, Volbeda A, Frey M, Fontecilla-Camps JC. The Crystal Structure of a Reduced [NiFeSe] Hydrogenase Provides an Image of the Activated Catalytic Center. Structure. 1999;7:557–566. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80072-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sellman D, Geipel F, Heinemann FW. (NEt4)[Fe(CN)2(CO)(‘S3’)]: An Iron Thiolate Complex Modeling the [Fe(CN)2(CO)(S-Cys)2] Site of the [NiFe] Hydrogenase Centers. Chem Eur J. 2002;8:958–966. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20020215)8:4<958::aid-chem958>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.James TL, Cai L, Muetterties MC, Holm RH. Dihydrogen Evolution by Protonation Reactions of Nickel(I) Inorg Chem. 1996;35:4148–4161. doi: 10.1021/ic960216v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sellman D, Geipel F, Moll M. [Ni(NHPPrn3)(‘S3’)], the First Nickel Thiolate Complex Modeling the Nickel Cysteinate Site and Reactivity of [NiFe] Hydrogenase. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2000;39:561–563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li Z, Ohki Y, Tatsumi K. Dithiolato-Bridged Dinuclear Iron-Nickel Complexes [Fe(CO)2(CN)2(μ-SCH2CH2CH2S)Ni(S2CNR2)]- Modeling the Active Site of [NiFe] Hydrogenases. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:8950–8951. doi: 10.1021/ja051590+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ohki Y, Yasamura K, Kuge K, Tanino S, Ando M, Li Z, Tatsumi K. Thiolate-bridged Dinuclear Iron(tris-carbonyl)-nickel Complexes Relevant to the Active Site of [NiFe] Hydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:7652–7657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800538105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ogo S, Kabe R, Uehara K, Kure B, Nishimura T, Menon SC, Harada R, Fukuzumi S, Higuchi Y, Ohhara T, Tamada T, Kuroki R. A Dinuclear Ni(μ-H)Ru Complex Derived from H2. Science. 2007;316:585–587. doi: 10.1126/science.1138751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pandey AS, Harris TV, Giles LJ, Peters JW, Szilagyi RK. Dithiomethylether as a Ligand in the Hydrogenase H-Cluster. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:4533–4540. doi: 10.1021/ja711187e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Seyferth D, Henderson RS, Song LC. The Dithiobis(tricarbonyliron) Dianion: Improved Preparation and New Chemistry. J Organometal Chem. 1980;192:C1–C5. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Singleton ML, Bhuvanesh N, Reibenspies JH, Darensbourg MY. Synthetic Support of De Novo Design: Sterically Bulky [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Models. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:9492–9495. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Stack TDP, Holm RH. Subsite-Differentiated Analogues of Biological [4Fe-4S]2+ Clusters: Synthesis, Solution and Solid State Structures, and Subsite-Specific Reactions. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:2484–2494. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tard C, Liu X, Ibrahim SK, Bruschi M, De Giola L, Davies SC, Yang X, Wang LS, Sawers G, Pickett CJ. Synthesis of the H-cluster Framework of Iron-only Hydrogenase. Nature. 2005;433:610–613. doi: 10.1038/nature03298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Capon JF, Gloaguen F, Schollhammer P, Talarmin J. Catalysis of Electrochemical H2 Evolution by Di-iron Subsite Models. Coord Chem Rev. 2005;249:1664–1676. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Heiden ZM, Zampella G, De Gioia L, Rauchfuss TB. [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Models and Hydrogen: Oxidative Addition of Dihydrogen and Silanes. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:9756–9759. doi: 10.1002/anie.200804400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Beinert H, Holm RH, Münck E. Iron-Sulfur Clusters: Nature's Modular, Multipurpose Structures. Science. 1997;277:653–659. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5326.653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Johnson DC, Dean DR, Smith AD, Johnson MK. Structure, Function, and Formation of Biological Iron-Sulfur Clusters. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:247–281. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Morales R, Chron MH, Hudry-Clergeon G, Pétillot Y, Norager S, Medina M, Frey M. Refined X-ray Structures of Oxidized, at 1.3 Å, and Reduced, at 1.17 Å, [2Fe-2S] Ferredoxin from the Cyanobacterium Anabaena PCC7119 Show Redox-Linked Conformational Changes. Biochemistry. 1999;38:15764–15773. doi: 10.1021/bi991578s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bönisch H, Schmidt CL, Schäfer G, Ladenstein R. The Structure of the Soluble Domain of an Archaeal Rieske Iron-Sulfur Protein at 1.1 Å Resolution. J Mol Biol. 2002;319:791–805. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00323-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nielsen MS, Harris P, Ooi BL, Christensen HEM. The 1.5 Å Resolution Crystal Structure of [Fe3S4]-Ferredoxin from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus. Biochemistry. 2004;43:5188–5194. doi: 10.1021/bi049942x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fukuyama K, Okada T, Kakuta Y, Takahashi Y. Atomic Resolution Structures of Oxidized [4Fe-4S] Ferredoxin from Bacillus thermoproteolyticus in Two Crystal Forms: Systematic Distortion of [4Fe-4S] Cluster in the Protein. J Mol Biol. 2002;315:1155–1166. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rao PV, Holm RH. Synthetic Analogues of the Active Sites of Iron-Sulfur Proteins. Chem Rev. 2004;104:527–559. doi: 10.1021/cr020615+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Holm RH. Electron Transfer: Iron-Sulfur Clusters. In: Que L Jr, Tolman WA, editors. Bio-coordination Chemistry. Elsevier; Oxford: 2004. pp. 61–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Link TA. The Structures of Rieske and Rieske-Type Proteins. Adv Inorg Chem. 1999;47:83–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ballmann J, Albers A, Demeshko S, Dechert S, Bill E, Bothe E, Ryde U, Meyer F. A Synthetic Analogue of Rieske-Type [2Fe-2S] Clusters. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:9537–9541. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Brown EN, Friemann R, Karlsson A, Parales JV, Couture MMJ, Eltis LD, Ramaswany S. Determining the Rieske Cluster Reduction Potentials. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2008;13:1301–1313. doi: 10.1007/s00775-008-0413-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yoo SJ, Angove HC, Burgess BK, Hendrich MP, Münck E. Mössbauer and Integer-Spin EPR Studies and Spin-Coupling Analysis of the [4Fe-4S]0 Cluster of the Fe Protein of Azotobacter vinelandii Nitrogenase. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:2534–2545. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Strop P, Takahara PM, Chiu HJ, Angove HC, Burgess BK, Rees DC. Crystal Structure of the All-Ferrous [4Fe-4S]0 Form of the Nitrogenase Iron Protein from Azotobacter vinelandii. Biochemistry. 2001;40:651–656. doi: 10.1021/bi0016467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Scott TA, Berlinguette CP, Holm RH, Zhou HC. Initial Synthesis and Structure of an All-Ferrous Analogue of the Fully Reduced [Fe4S4]0 Cluster of the Nitrogenase Iron Protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9741–9744. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504258102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Deng L, Holm RH. Stabilization of Fully Reduced Iron-Sulfur Clusters by Carbene Ligation: The [FenSn]0 Oxidation Levels (n = 4, 8) J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:9878–9886. doi: 10.1021/ja802111w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chakrabarti M, Deng L, Holm RH, Münck E, Bominaar EL. Mössbauer, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Theoretical Study of a Carbene-Based All-Ferrous Fe4S4 Cluster: Electronic Origin and Structural Identification of the Unique Spectroscopic Site. Inorg Chem. 2009 doi: 10.1021/ic802192w. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Dobbek H, Gremer L, Meyer O, Huber R. Crystal Structure and Mechanism of CO Dehydrogenase: aMolybdo Iron-Sulfur Flavoprotein Containing S-selanylcysteine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:8884–8889. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.8884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ragsdale SW, Kumar M. Nickel-Containing Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase/Acetyl-CoA Synthase. Chem Rev. 1996;96:2515–2539. doi: 10.1021/cr950058+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lindahl PA, Graham DE. Acetyl-coenzyme A Synthases and Nickel-Containing Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenases. Metal Ions Life Sci. 2007;2:357–415. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lindahl PA. Implications of a Carboxylate-Bound C-Cluster Structure of Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4054–4056. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dobbek H, Gremer L, Kiefersauer R, Huber R, Meyer O. Catalysis at a Dinuclear [CuSMo(=O)OH] Cluster in a CO Dehydrogenase Resolved at 1.1-Å Resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:15971–15976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212640899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gourley C, Nielsen DJ, White JM, Knottenbelt SZ, Kirk ML, Young CG. Paramagnetic Active Site Models for the Molybdenum-Copper Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:2164–2165. doi: 10.1021/ja056500f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Takuma M, Ohki Y, Tatsumi K. Sulfido-Bridged Dinuclear Molybdenum-Copper Complexes Related to the Active Site of CO Dehydrogenase: [(dithiolate)Mo(O)S2Cu(SAr)]2- (dithiolate = 1,2-S2C6H4, 1,2-S2C6H2-3,6-Cl2, 1,2-S2C2H4) Inorg Chem. 2005;44:6034–6043. doi: 10.1021/ic050294v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhou J, Raebiger JW, Crawford CA, Holm RH. Metal Ion Incorporation Reactions of the Cluster [Fe3S4(LS3)]3-, Containing the Cuboidal [Fe3S4]0 Core. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:6242–6250. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Panda R, Berlinguette CP, Zhang Y, Holm RH. Synthesis of MFe3S4 Clusters Containing a Planar MII Site (M = Ni, Pd, Pt), a Structural Element in the C-Cluster of Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:11092–11101. doi: 10.1021/ja052381s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sun J, Tessier C, Holm RH. Sulfur Ligand Substitution at the Nickel(II) Sites of Cubane-Type and Cubanoid NiFe3S4 Clusters Relevant to the C-Clusters of Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:2691–2699. doi: 10.1021/ic062362z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Dobbek H, Svetlitchnyi V, Liss J, Meyer O. Carbon Monoxide Induced Decomposition of the Active Site [Ni-4Fe-5S] Cluster of CO Dehydrogenase. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:5382–5387. doi: 10.1021/ja037776v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jeoung JH, Dobbek H. Carbon Dioxide Activation at the Ni,Fe-Cluster of Anaerobic Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase. Science. 2007;318:1461–1464. doi: 10.1126/science.1148481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Howard JB, Rees DC. Structural Basis of Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Chem Rev. 1996;96:2965–2982. doi: 10.1021/cr9500545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Howard JB, Rees DC. How Many Metals Does It Take to Fix N2? A Mechanistic Overview of Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17088–17093. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603978103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Peters JW, Stowell MHB, Soltis SM, Finnegan MG, Johnson MK, Rees DC. Redox-Dependent Structural Changes in the Nitrogenase P-Cluster. Biochemistry. 1997;36:1181–1187. doi: 10.1021/bi9626665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Mayer SM, Lawson DM, Gormal CA, Roe SM, Smith BE. New Insights into Structure-function Relationships in Nitrogenase: A 1.6 Å X-ray Crystallographic Study of Klebsiella pneumoniae MoFe-protein. J Mol Biol. 1999;292:871–891. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Einsle O, Tezcan FA, Andrade SLA, Schmid B, Yoshida M, Howard JB, Rees DC. Nitrogenase MoFe-Protein at 1.16 Å Resolution: A Central Ligand in the FeMo-Cofactor. Science. 2002;297:1696–1700. doi: 10.1126/science.1073877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lee SC, Holm RH. Speculative Synthetic Chemistry and the Nitrogenase Problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3595–3600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630028100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Lee SC, Holm RH. The Clusters of Nitrogenase: Synthetic Methodology in the Construction of Weak-Field Clusters. Chem Rev. 2004;104:1135–1157. doi: 10.1021/cr0206216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Berlinguette CP, Miyaji T, Zhang Y, Holm RH. Precursors to Clusters with the Topology of the PN Cluster of Nitrogenase: Edge-Bridged Double Cubane Clusters [(Tp)2Mo2Fe6S8L4]z -- Synthesis, Structures, and Electron Transfer Series. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:1997–2007. doi: 10.1021/ic051770k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zhang Y, Holm RH. Synthesis of a Molecular Mo2Fe6S9 Cluster with the Topology of the PN Cluster of Nitrogenase by Rearrangement of an Edge-Bridged Mo2Fe6S8 Double Cubane. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:3910–3920. doi: 10.1021/ja0214633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zuo JL, Zhou HC, Holm RH. Vanadium-Iron-Sulfur Clusters Containing the Cubane-Type [VFe3S4] Core Unit: Synthesis of a Cluster with the Topology of the PN Cluster of Nitrogenase. Inorg Chem. 2003:4624–4631. doi: 10.1021/ic0301369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Osterloh F, Sanakis Y, Staples RJ, Münck E, Holm RH. A Molybdenum-Iron-Sulfur Cluster Containing Structural Elements Relevant to the P-Cluster of Nitrogenase. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1999;38:2066–2070. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990712)38:13/14<2066::AID-ANIE2066>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Osterloh F, Achim C, Holm RH. Reduced Molybdenum-Iron-Sulfur Clusters of Nuclearities Eight and Sixteen, Including a Topological Analogue of the P-Cluster of Nitrogenase. Inorg Chem. 2001;40:224–232. doi: 10.1021/ic000617h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Ohki Y, Ikagawa Y, Tatsumi K. Synthesis of New [8Fe-7S] Clusters: A Topological Link between the Core Structures of P-Cluster, FeMo-co and FeFe-co of Nitrogenase. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:10457–10465. doi: 10.1021/ja072256b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kukchar J, Hausinger RP. Biosynthesis of Metal Sites. Chem Rev. 2004;104:509–525. doi: 10.1021/cr020613p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dos Santos PC, Dean DR, Hu Y, Ribbe MW. Formation and Insertion of the Nitrogenase Iron-Molybdenum Cofactor. Chem Rev. 2004;104:1159–1173. doi: 10.1021/cr020608l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hu Y, Fay AW, Lee CC, Yoshizawa J, Ribbe MW. Assembly of Nitrogenase MoFe protein. Biochemistry. 2008;47:3973–3981. doi: 10.1021/bi7025003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES