Abstract
Ortholithiations of a range of arenes mediated by lithium diisopropylamide (LDA) in THF at -78 °C reveal substantial accelerations by as little as 0.5 mol % LiCl (relative to LDA). Substrate dependencies suggest a specific range of reactivity within which the LiCl catalysis is optimal. Standard protocols using unpurified commercial samples of n-butyllithium to prepare LDA or commercially available LDA show marked batch-dependent rates--up to 100-fold--that could prove significant to the unwary practitioner. Other lithium salts elicit more modest accelerations. The mechanism is not discussed.
Introduction
We report herein lithium diisopropylamide (LDA)-mediated ortholithiations1 that are markedly accelerated by LiCl (eq 1). Beneficial effects of LiCl on the chemistry of LDA and other organolithium reactions have been documented.2-4 Nevertheless, the magnitudes of these accelerations of ortholithiation are striking and the implications in synthesis are potentially significant.
![]() |
(1) |
Results
We preface the results with several comments about protocol. Most investigators either purchase LDA as a THF solvate or prepare it in situ from commercially available n-BuLi.5 The implications of these procedures are discussed below. The LDA used in this study was prepared from recrystallized n-BuLi,6 further recrystallized from hexane,7 and shown to contain <0.02% LiCl by potentiometry8 and ion chromatography.9 The added LiCl was generated in situ from recrystallized Et3N·HCl.10 The Et3N by-product is a poor ligand11 that has no effect on the ortholithiations.
Ortholithiations were monitored using in situ IR spectroscopy12 following both the disappearance of the arene and the formation of the resulting aryllithium.13 19F NMR spectroscopic analysis provided comparable results in a number of instances. Trapping experiments were consistent with lithiation but are unreliable measures of the rates because they generate catalytically active lithium salts. Trimethylchlorosilane, for example, generates LiCl,3c making LiCl-sensitive arene lithiations nearly instantaneous.
Although some metalations display normal (exponential) decays, autocatalysis14 arising from the aryllithiums was evident in the form of linear and sigmoidal decays for many substrates (supporting information). Consequently, the rates of uncatalyzed ortholithiation are simply reported as half-lives (t1/2), and the LiCl-mediated accelerations as the ratios of 1/t1/2's with and without added 0.5% LiCl (kLiCl).15 The approximation is crude but adequate for our needs.
The results from LiCl-free and LiCl-catalyzed LDA-mediated metalations are illustrated in Table 1. The accelerations reflected by kLiCl values derive from adding only 0.5 mol % LiCl. Higher concentrations of LiCl produce greater accelerations (resulting in immeasurably high rates in many instances.) The substrates in Table 1 are ordered from the most reactive (small t1/2) to the least reactive (large t1/2), revealing an interesting pattern: Substrates of intermediate reactivity are most prone to catalysis. Both the fastest metalations (t1/2 < 200 s) and the slowest (t > 105 s) metalations are relatively insensitive to external LiCl.
Table I.
Rates of lithium diisopropylamide-mediated ortholithiation (eq 1) listed in order of decreasing reactivity.
| Entry | Substrate | tl/2 (in S)(-78 °C) | kLicla |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() |
80 | 2 |
| 2 | ![]() |
170 | 2 |
| 3 | ![]() |
190 | 2 |
| 4 | ![]() |
240 | 5 |
| 5 | ![]() |
450 | 9 |
| 6 | ![]() |
1950 | 11 |
| 7 | ![]() |
2800 | 10 |
| 8 | ![]() |
2900 | 2 |
| 9 | ![]() |
3600 | 45 |
| 10 | ![]() |
4300 | 60 |
| 11 | ![]() |
5600 | 55 |
| 12 | ![]() |
7900 | 55 |
| 13 | ![]() |
104 | 10 |
| 14 | ![]() |
>105 | 1 (-65 °C) |
| 15 | ![]() |
>105 | 1 (-30 °C) |
| 16 | ![]() |
>105 | 1 (0 °C) |
| 17 | ![]() |
>105 | 1 (20 °C) |
Measured at -78 °C unless otherwise noted.
We draw the readers attention to entry 8, which does not follow the pattern. Notably, increasing the LiCl concentration to 10 mol % has no effect. In short, a kLiCl of 2 appears to be within the experimental error of unity. But why is entry 8 aberrant? Curiously, the LiCl-sensitive ortholithiations involve substrates containing halogen-based directing groups (F, Cl, or CF3). Similarly, the ortholithiation in entry 3 shows only a marginal increase in kLiCl with larger aliquots of LiCl. This result may foreshadow conclusions from ongoing mechanistic studies.
It would be especially provocative if the accelerations elicited significant changes in regioselectivity. Schlosser, for example, noted advantageous regiochemical effects of a brew containing both i-Pr2NCOOLi and catalytic LiBr.4 Metalations of 1 and 2, however, reveal strong LiCl catalysis, but the regioselectivities (indicated by the arrows) remains unchanged, as expected for reversible metalations.4,16,17
Using standard protocols in which the LDA is unpurified, we observed >102-fold swings in the reaction rate depending on the commercial source of the n-BuLi or LDA. These variations were not supplier dependent per se, but rather batch dependent. A statistically marginal sampling suggests that commercially available LDA may have a lower LiCl titer and be less prone to inadvertent accelerations compared to LDA generated from commercial n-BuLi. Lloyd-Jones noted batch dependencies of aryl triflate metalations that appeared to stem from lithium halides.3d Nonetheless, the variations were enormous, inspiring us to repeat a timeless maxim: buyer beware.
Cursory investigation of the influence of other lithium salts (10 mol %) revealed the accelerations illustrated in eq 2. Clearly, LiCl is the most efficient catalyst.
![]() |
(2) |
We have explicitly deferred mechanistic speculation. The dramatic LiCl-mediated accelerations do, however, appear to correlate with arene metalations that are also prone to autocatalysis.14
Conclusions
LDA/THF/-78 °C-mediated ortholithiations are anomalous in many respects,14 including a marked penchant for LiCl catalysis. The catalysis is observed in a narrow but potentially consequential window. Unsuspecting academic chemists may have detected irregularities--batch dependencies--that proved a source of annoyance. The results suggest opportunities to optimize protocols. We believe, however, that industrial chemists should be especially wary of these results. Rate variations that go undetected on small scales could give way to unexpected and potentially costly variations on process and plant scales. Our advice to both communities is the same: try adding a few mol % Et3N·HCl to LDA at the outset.
Experimental Section
Reagents and Solvents
THF and hexane were distilled from blue or purple solutions containing sodium benzophenone ketyl. The hexane contained 1% tetraglyme to dissolve the ketyl. Both n-BuLi and LDA were recrystallized.6,7 Solutions of n-BuLi and LDA were titrated using a literature method.18 Arenes were either commercially available or prepared via literature protocols.19 Et3N·HCl was recrystallized from THF/2-propanol.
IR Spectroscopic Analyses
Spectra were recorded using an in situ IR spectrometer fitted with a 30-bounce, silicon-tipped probe. The spectra were acquired in 16 scans at a gain of 1 and a resolution of 4 cm-1. A representative reaction was carried out as follows: The IR probe was inserted through a nylon adapter and O-ring seal into an oven-dried, cylindrical flask fitted with a magnetic stir bar and a T-joint. The T-joint was capped by a septum for injections and a nitrogen line. After evacuation under full vacuum, heating, and flushing with nitrogen, the flask was charged with LDA (129 mg, 1.20 mmol) in THF and cooled in a dry ice-acetone bath prepared from fresh acetone. LiCl (0.5 mol% relative to LDA) was added as a stock solution (0.50 mL) containing Et3N·HCl (8.3 mg, 0.06 mmol) and LDA (13.5 mg, 0.12 mmol) in 5 mL THF. After recording a background spectrum, we added an arene (1.0 mmol) with stirring. IR spectra were recorded over the course of the reaction. Absorbances corresponding to the arene moieties (1350-1650 cm-1) were monitored in most cases. Spectra were recorded every 3 s.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Institutes of Health (GM39764) for direct support of this work and Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Sanofi-Aventis for indirect support.
Footnotes
Supporting Information. Spectroscopic data, rate data, a select experimental procedures including LiCl titration protocols (26 pages). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References and Footnotes
- 1.(a) Hartung CG, Snieckus V. Chapter 10. In: Astruc D, editor. Modern Arene Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2002. [Google Scholar]; (b) Snieckus V. Chem. Rev. 1990;90:879. [Google Scholar]; (c) Schlosser M, Mongin F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:1161. doi: 10.1039/b706241a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Mongin F, Quéguiner G. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:4059. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Seebach D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988;27:1624. [Google Scholar]; (b) Seebach D. Proceedings of the Robert A. Welch Foundation Conferences on Chemistry and Biochemistry. Wiley; New York: 1984. [Google Scholar]; (c) Tchoubar B, Loupy A. Salt Effects in Organic and Organometallic Chemistry. VCH Publishers; New York: 1992. Chapters 4, 5, and 7. [Google Scholar]; (d) Caubère P. Chem. Rev. 1993;93:2317. [Google Scholar]; (e) Juaristi E, Beck AK, Hansen J, Matt T, Mukhopadhyay T, Simson M, Seebach D. Synthesis. 1993:1271. [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Kummer DA, Chain WJ, Morales MR, Quiroga O, Myers AG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:13231. doi: 10.1021/ja806021y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Galiano-Roth AS, Kim Y-J, Gilchrist JH, Harrison AT, Fuller DJ, Collum DB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113:5053. [Google Scholar]; (c) Lipshutz BH, Wood MR, Lindsley CW. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:4385. [Google Scholar]; (d) Dyke AM, Gill DM, Harvey JN, Hester AJ, Lloyd-Jones GC, Munoz MP, Shepperson IR. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008;47:5067. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.For beneficial effects of other lithium salts on ortholithiation, see: Cottet F, Schlosser M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004:3793.
- 5.(a) Bakker WII, Wong PL, Snieckus V. Lithium Diisopropylamide. In: Paquette LA, editor. e-EROS. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 2001. [Google Scholar]; (b) Clayden J. In: Organolithiums: Selectivity for Synthesis. Baldwin JE, Williams RM, editors. Pergamon; New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rennels RA, Maliakal AJ, Collum DB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:421. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim Y-J, Bernstein MP, Galiano-Roth AS, Romesberg FE, Fuller DJ, Harrison AT, Collum DB, Williard PG. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56:4435. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Evans A. Potentiometry and Ion-Selective Electrodes. Wiley; New York: 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dasgupta DK. Anal. Chem. 1992;64:775A. [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Snaith and coworkers clearly articulated the merits of NH4X salts as precursors to anhydrous LiX salts: Barr D, Snaith R, Wright DS, Mulvey RE, Wade K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:7891. (b) Also, see: Hall PL, Gilchrist JH, Collum DB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113:9571.
- 11.Zhao P, Collum DB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:14411. doi: 10.1021/ja030168v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rein AJ, Donahue SM, Pavlosky MA. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2000;3:734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Weymeels E, Awad H, Bischoff L, Mongin F, Trécourt F, Quéguiner G, Marsais F. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:3245. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Singh KJ, Hoepker AC, Collum DB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:18008. doi: 10.1021/ja807331k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.We define kLiCl = t1/2(no LiCl)/t1/2(0.5% LiCl)
- 16.The regioselectivity for 2 is assigned based on a marked upfield shift of the 19F resonance in one isomer but not the other. The regioselectivity in 1 is based on a literature report: Dabrowski M, Kubicka J, Lulinski S, Serwatowski Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:4175.
- 17.Trecourt F, Mallet M, Marsais F, Queguiner G. J. Org. Chem. 1988;53:1367. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kofron WG, Baclawski LM. J. Org. Chem. 1976;41:1879. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Arene preparations: (a) Table 1, entries 2, 3, 14, 15, and compound 2: Lustig E, Benson WR, Duy N. J. Org. Chem. 1967;32:851. Yamagami C, Takao N, Nishioka T, Fujita T, Takeuchi Y. Org. Magn. Reson. 1984;22:439. (b) Table 1, entry 7: Newman MS, Kannan R. J. Org. Chem. 1979;44:3388. (c) Table 1, entry 8: Tsukazaki M, Snieckus V. Can. J. Chem. 1992;70:1486. (d) Table 1, entry 17: Harris TD, Neuschwander B, Boekelheide V. J. Org. Chem. 1978;43:727.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




















