Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Mar 4;131(8):2786–2787. doi: 10.1021/ja809176m

Enantioselective Intramolecular Openings of Oxetanes Catalyzed by (salen)Co(III) Complexes: Access to Enantioenriched Tetrahydrofurans

Rebecca N Loy 1, Eric N Jacobsen 1,*
PMCID: PMC2765541  NIHMSID: NIHMS93594  PMID: 19199427

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms93594u1.jpg

The catalytic enantioselective intramolecular ring-opening of oxetanes with alcohols is catalyzed by (salen)Co(III) complexes. Either a monomeric or oligomeric catalyst can be used successfully in this transformation, providing 3-substituted tetrahydrofurans in both high yield and enantioselectivity. This methodology extends the range of electrophiles that can be activated toward highly enantioselective addition reactions by (salen)metal catalysts to an important new class.


Oxetanes are receiving increased attention as intermediates in organic synthesis and drug discovery, thanks in part to the development of new methods for their preparation.1,2 At this stage, few enantioselective reactions of oxetanes have been realized; these include ring expansions catalyzed by chiral copper complexes3 and ring openings with organolithium reagents promoted by a chiral boron reagent.4 We became intrigued by the possibility of activating oxetanes with (salen)Co(III) complexes for enantioselective ring opening (e.g., eq 1), given the successful application of these catalysts in the asymmetric ring-opening of epoxides.5,6 Herein, we describe intramolecular openings of oxetanes catalyzed by (salen)Co(III) complexes 1 and 2 to afford functionalized tetrahydrofurans in high yields and enantioselectivities.

graphic file with name nihms93594e1.jpg (1)

graphic file with name nihms93594u2.jpg

Lewis acid catalysis represents a viable approach to enantioselective ring opening of oxetanes, given that oxetanes possess lower ring strain7 but superior Lewis basicity8 relative to epoxides. Mechanistic studies of (salen)Co(III)-catalyzed reactions have established that epoxide ring-openings occur through cooperative bimetallic mechanisms involving simultaneous activation of nucleophile and Lewis acid activation of epoxide.9 By enforcing cooperative interactions between (salen)Co units, oligomeric catalysts such as 2 have been shown to provide greatly enhanced reactivity compared with monomeric catalysts.10

We chose to examine achiral 3-substituted oxetanes as potential reacting partners, as these substrates are readily accessed from malonate esters or 3-oxetanone,11 and are susceptible, in principle, to enantioselective ring-opening with nucleophiles other than water. Intermolecular additions to 3-butyloxetane were studied using nucleophiles proven effective in (salen)Co(III)-catalyzed epoxide ring-opening reactions, such methanol,10c,e 4-methoxyphenol10c,e,12 and tert-butyl carbamate.13,10e However, no desired ring-opened product was obtained in any case using either 10 mol% monomeric (salen)Co(III) complex 1 or 2 mol% of the oligomeric complex 2.

Encouraged by the excellent reactivity and enantioselectivity obtained in intramolecular epoxide openings with alcohols using monomeric (salen)Co(III),14 we examined intramolecular opening of oxetanes as a potential route to pharmacologically active and synthetically useful 3-substituted heterocycles (Table 1).1517 A variety of oxetane-containing tethered nucleophiles were prepared and treated with catalytic levels of (salen)Co(III) complexes 1 and 2. Cyclization to provide tetrahydrofuran 4a proceeded in excellent enantioselectivity and yield using either the monomeric or oligomeric catalyst. Cyclization of 5 to tetrahydropyran 6 proceeded substantially more slowly, yet with high enantioselectivity and yield using oligomeric catalyst 2, whereas cyclizations to provide seven-membered ring oxepanes were unsuccessful. Oxetane 7 bearing carbamate nucleophilic component underwent ring-opening with diminished yield and enantioselectivity.

Table 1.

Representative Intramolecular Oxetane Ring-Openings

graphic file with name nihms93594f1.jpg
entry substrate product catalyst (mol%) time (h) yielda (%) eeb (%)
1 graphic file with name nihms93594t1.jpg
3a
graphic file with name nihms93594t2.jpg
4a
1 (1) 1 92d 98
2 2 (0.01) 2 93e 96
3 graphic file with name nihms93594t3.jpg
5
graphic file with name nihms93594t4.jpg
6
1 (10) 96 38d 7
4 2 (0.1) 96 89e 96
7 graphic file with name nihms93594t5.jpg
7
graphic file with name nihms93594t6.jpg
8
1 (10) 72 72f 50c
8 2 (10) 72 70e 10c
a

Isolated yield after flash chromatography on SiO2.

b

Determined by chiral HPLC analysis of the benzoylated product unless noted otherwise.

c

Determined by chiral GC analysis of the trifluoroacetylated product.

d

Reaction carried out in the absence of solvent.

e

Reaction carried out in MeCN (6 M).

f

Reaction carried out in TBME (6 M).

The scope of the intramolecular opening of oxetanes with O-centered nucleophiles was examined with a variety of achiral oxetane substrates bearing nucleophilic appendages (Table 2). A series of substituted ethanol derivatives underwent ring opening with high enantioselectivity and yield (entries 3–10). Alkyl (3b–c, 3i) and phenyl (3d) substitution at the 3-position of the oxetane was tolerated, affording products bearing quaternary stereocenters.18 Incorporation of a fluorine substituent in the substrate provided tetrahydrofuran 4e, which contains an interesting fluorine-bearing stereocenter. Ring-opening of phenolic substrates (3f–h) provided enantioenriched dihyrobenzofurans; however, higher catalyst loadings were required to attain high levels of enantioselectivity.

Table 2.

Enantioselective Tetrahydrofuran and Benzodihydrofuran Synthesis

graphic file with name nihms93594f2.jpg
entry substrate product catalyst (mol%) time (h) yielda (%) eeb (%)
1 graphic file with name nihms93594t7.jpg
3a
graphic file with name nihms93594t8.jpg
4a
1 (1.0) 1 92c 98h
2 2 (0.01) 2 93d 96h
3 graphic file with name nihms93594t9.jpg
3b
graphic file with name nihms93594t10.jpg
4b
1 (1.0) 6 87c 99
4 2 (0.01) 6 88d 96
5 graphic file with name nihms93594t11.jpg
3c
graphic file with name nihms93594t12.jpg
4c
1 (1.0) 24 96e 98
6 2 (0.01) 24 98d 99
7 graphic file with name nihms93594t13.jpg
3d
graphic file with name nihms93594t14.jpg
4d
1 (1.0) 2 93c 99
8 2 (0.01) 12 97d 99
9 graphic file with name nihms93594t15.jpg
3e
graphic file with name nihms93594t16.jpg
4e
1 (1.0) 7 87c 97h
10 2 (0.01) 7 76d 98h
11 graphic file with name nihms93594t17.jpg
3f
graphic file with name nihms93594t18.jpg
4f
1 (5) 8 94e 93
12 2 (0.01) 6 89d 98
13 graphic file with name nihms93594t19.jpg
3g
graphic file with name nihms93594t20.jpg
4a
1 (10) 8 77e 96
14 2 (1) 8 95d 98
15 graphic file with name nihms93594t21.jpg
3h
graphic file with name nihms93594t22.jpg
4h
1 (10) 96 79f 84
16 2 (1) 6 94g 88
17 graphic file with name nihms93594t23.jpg
3i
graphic file with name nihms93594t24.jpg
4i
1 (1) 5 88c 97
18 2 (0.01) 5 98d 99
a

Isolated yield, after flash chromatography on SiO2.

b

Determined by chiral HPLC analysis of the benzoylated product unless noted otherwise.

c

Reaction carried out in the absence of solvent.

d

Reaction carried out in MeCN (6 M).

e

Reaction carried out in TBME (6 M).

f

TBME (1 M).

g

MeCN (1 M).

h

Determined by chiral GC analysis of the trifluoroacetylated product.

Both monomeric and oligomeric complexes proved to be efficient catalysts for the enantioselective ring-opening of oxetanes, providing access to a wide variety of tetrahydrofurans in high enantioselectivity and yield. Monomeric catalyst 1 is easily accessed from the commercially available (salen)Co(II) complex by treatment with TfOH.19 Reactions using this catalyst can be carried out either solvent-free or with small amounts of TBME, and catalyst loadings as low as 1 mol%. Oligomeric catalyst 2 displays enhanced efficiency, and can be used in loadings as low as 0.01 mol%, often with improved enantioselectivity. We are now pursuing synthetic applications and mechanistic studies of the oxetane ring-opening reaction.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001. Supporting Information.

Representative experimental procedures, characterization data, and chiral chromatographic analyses of racemic and enantiomerically enriched products. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NIH (GM 43214).

References

  • 1.Hickford PJ, Baker JR, Bruce I, Booker-Milburn KI. Org Lett. 2007;9:4681–4684. doi: 10.1021/ol701625q. and references therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Methods of oxetane construction: Wuitschik G, Rogers-Evans M, Müller K, Fischer H, Wagner B, Schuler F, Polonchuk L, Carreira EM. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:7736–7739. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602343.Wuitschik G, Rogers-Evans M, Buckl A, Bernasconi M, Märki M, Godel T, Fischer H, Wagner B, Parrilla I, Schuler F, Schneider J, Alker A, Schweizer WB, Müller K, Carreira EM. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4450–4515. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800450. Stereoselective formation of oxetanes: Horspool W, Lens F, editors. CRC Handbook of Photochemistry and Photobiology. CRC Press LLC; Boca Raton, FL: 2004. pp. 59-1–59-19.Sone T, Ly G, Matsunaga S, Shibasaki M. Angew Chem Int Ed. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805473. [Online early access] Published Online: January 22, 2009.
  • 3.(a) Nozaki H, Moriuti S, Takaya H, Noyori R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966:5239–5244. [Google Scholar]; (b) Nozaki H, Takaya H, Moriuti S, Noyori R. Tetrahedron. 1968;24:3655–3669. [Google Scholar]; (c) Ito K, Katsuki T. Chem Lett. 1994:1857–1860. [Google Scholar]; (d) Lo MM, Fu GC. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:2621–2634. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Mizuno M, Kanai M, Iida A, Tomioka K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1996;7:2483–2484. [Google Scholar]; (b) Mizuno M, Kanai M, Iida A, Tomioka K. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:10699–10708. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.For reviews, see: Larrow JF, Jacobsen EN. Topics Organomet Chem. 2004;6:123–152.Jacobsen EN. Acc Chem Res. 2000;33:421–431. doi: 10.1021/ar960061v.
  • 6.Metal salen complexes of chromium and aluminum have shown to catalyze the polymerization of trimethylene oxide and CO2. Darensbourg DJ, Ganguly P, Choi W. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:3831–3833. doi: 10.1021/ic052109j.Darensbourg DJ, Moncada AI, Choi W, Reibenspies JH. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:6523–6533. doi: 10.1021/ja800302c.
  • 7.Dudev T, Lim CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:4450–4458. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berthelot M, Besseau F, Laurence C. Eur J Org Chem. 1998:925–931. doi: 10.1021/jo050535g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nielsen LPC, Stevenson CP, Blackmond DG, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:1360–1362. doi: 10.1021/ja038590z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Konsler RG, Karl J, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:10780–10781. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ready JM, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:2687–2688. doi: 10.1021/ja005867b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ready JM, Jacobsen EN. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:1374–1377. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020415)41:8<1374::aid-anie1374>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) White DE, Jacobsen EN. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2003;14:3633–3538. [Google Scholar]; (e) White DE. PhD Thesis. Harvard University; Cambridge, Massachusetts: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.For details of substrate synthesis, see Supporting Information.
  • 12.Ready JM, Jacobsen EN. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:6086–6087. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bartoli G, Bosco M, Carlone A, Locatelli M, Melchiorre P, Sambri L. Org Lett. 2004;6:3973–3975. doi: 10.1021/ol048322l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu MH, Hansen KB, Jacobsen EN. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1999;38:2012–2014. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990712)38:13/14<2012::AID-ANIE2012>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Some examples of pharmacologically active 3-substituted hetereocycles: Lyles-Eggleston M, Altundas R, Xia J, Sikazwe DMN, Fan P, Yang Q, Li S, Zhang W, Zhu X, Schmidt AW, Vanase-Frawley M, Shrihkande A, Villalobos A, Borne RF, Ablordeppey SY. J Med Chem. 2004;47:497–508. doi: 10.1021/jm0301033.Kuo EA, Hambleton PT, Kay DP, Evans PL, Matharu SS, Little E, McDowall N, Jones CB, Hedgecock CJR, Yea CM, Chan AWE, Hairsine PW, Ager IR, Tully WR, Williamson RA, Westwood R. J Med Chem. 1996;39:4608–4621. doi: 10.1021/jm9604437.Lavrador K, Guillerm D, Guillerm G. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1998;8:1629–1634. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(98)00267-4.Walsh DA, Franzyshen SK, Yanni JM. J Med Chem. 1989;32:105–118. doi: 10.1021/jm00121a022.
  • 16.For an example of disatereoselective intramolecular opening of oxetanes, see: Bach T, Kather K, Krämer O. J Org Chem. 1998;63:1910–1918.
  • 17.For reviews on the synthesis of enantioenriched 3-substituted heterocycles see: Brown HC, Gupta AK, Rangaishenvi MV, Vara Prasad JVN. Heterocycles. 1989;28:283–294.Horiuchi T, Ohta T, Shirakawa E, Nozaki K, Takaya H. J Org Chem. 1997;62:4285–4292. doi: 10.1021/jo9624051.
  • 18.Ring-opening reactions affording tetrahydropyrans bearing quaternary centers proceeded in low yield and enantioselectivity.graphic file with name nihms93594u3.jpg
  • 19.For details of catalyst synthesis, see Supporting Information. For a similar procedure to make the (salen)CoOTs analog of 1, see: Stevenson CP, Nielsen LPC, Jacobsen EN. Org Syn. 2006;83:162–169.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001. Supporting Information.

Representative experimental procedures, characterization data, and chiral chromatographic analyses of racemic and enantiomerically enriched products. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org

RESOURCES