Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2009 Mar 5;11(5):1115–1118. doi: 10.1021/ol802656n

An Emissive C Analog Distinguishes between G, 8-oxoG and T

Nicholas J Greco 1, Renatus W Sinkeldam 1, Yitzhak Tor 1,
PMCID: PMC2765557  NIHMSID: NIHMS93592  PMID: 19196162

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms93592u1.jpg

A minimally disruptive fluorescent dC analog provides a rapid and non-destructive method for in vitro detection of G, 8-oxoG and T, the downstream transverse mutation product.


One of the most thoroughly examined DNA base modifications is 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), a mutagenic product of oxidative damage by reactive oxygen species.1 The presence of 8-oxoG is frequently viewed as a marker for cellular oxidative stress, a condition that has been linked to carcinogenesis.2 The significance of this seemingly minor base damage results from 8-oxoG’s ability to deceive DNA polymerases and form a stable (syn)8-oxoG•A base pair by presenting its Hoogsteen face thereby mimicking T (Figure 1).3 Unless repaired, this might cause G to T transversion mutations during DNA synthesis (Figure 1).4 Not surprisingly, base-excision repair mechanisms have evolved to correct such deleterious base modification products, and the bacterial and human enzymes have been thoroughly studied.5

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Base pairing along the DNA damage pathway from G•C to T•A, (its transverse mutation product) via 8-oxoG.

A non-destructive and real-time fluorescence-based detection of 8-oxoG, its repair and induced mutation processes in oligonucleotides, could significantly advance the in vitro biochemical evaluation of this important DNA lesion.6 It would complement existing methods that rely on chromatographic, electrophoretic and immunological methods.7,8 Toward this end, we hypothesized that one could take advantage of the distinct redox properties of 8-oxoG.9 Electrochemical measurements show that 8-oxoG is more easily oxidized compared to G (E1/2 ≈ 0.75 and 1.3 vs. NHE, respectively).9a,10 Consequently, chemical approaches relying on 8-oxoG’s susceptibility to oxidation and covalent trapping of the oxidized products in duplex DNA have been reported.11 Since fluorescence quenching frequently occurs via photoinduced electron transfer (PET) mechanisms,12 we suspected that 8-oxoG is likely to be a more effective quencher of certain fluorophores compared to G, its precursor.13 Here we describe the design, synthesis, photophysical evaluation, incorporation and implementation of a simple isomorphic fluorescent dC analog 5 that, upon incorporation into an oligonucleotide, photophysically distinguishes between 8-oxoG and G on the complementary strand. Not only is the damaged 8-oxoG-containing duplex highly quenched and the “repaired” G-containing duplex more emissive, the transverse mutated duplex containing T instead of G displays the most intense emission. This furan-containing emissive nucleobase therefore provides signature emission profiles for all key nucleobases involved in this DNA damage pathway (Figure 1).14

We have been developing simple and minimally perturbing emissive nucleobases for the detection of nucleic acids lesions.15,16 The primary design principle dictates maintaining the highest possible structural similarity to the natural nucleobases, while significantly improving their photophysical properties. Specifically, an isolated absorption band for selective excitation, enhanced quantum yield over the native nucleobases and sensitivity to changes in the microenvironment are desired. Useful uridine-based nucleosides, fulfilling these criteria, were obtained by conjugating five-membered aromatic heterocycles such as furan at the 5 position (e.g., 2).15,16,17,18 Among the various heterocycles conjugated to dU (i.e., furan, thiophene, oxazole, thiazole) the furan moiety was found to yield the most favorable photophysical characteristics.15,17a We therefore anticipated the analogous furan modified cytosine nucleobase to be emissive and responsive.

The 5-modified nucleosides are easily obtained using a coupling reaction between the 5-iodo substituted dU (1) and the corresponding stannylated heterocycles (Scheme 1). Conversion of the acetate protected furan-modified dU analog 3 to the desired dC analog 5 is accomplished by activation of the 4 position as an aryl sulfonate ester followed by a displacement reaction with ammonia,19 providing the fully deprotected furan-modified dC analog 5 (Scheme 1).17a,20 Silyl protection of the furan-modified dU 4 facilitated the conversion to the dC analog 6 with retention of hydroxyl protection thus allowing for standard benzamide protection of the exocyclic amine to give 7. Desilylation and protection of the 5′-hydroxyl as the 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl derivative (9) followed by phosphitylation of the unprotected 3′-hydroxyl afforded 10, the building block necessary for automated DNA synthesis (Scheme 1).20

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of furan dC analog 5 and its corresponding amidite.

The absorption spectrum of an aqueous solution of 5 shows, in addition to the typical high energy band seen in the parent nucleoside, a clear shoulder at ~310 nm (Figure 2). Excitation at this wavelength yields an emission profile with a maximum at 443 nm, which tails deeply into the visible range, with a relative quantum yield of 0.02 (Table 1).20,21 Lowering solvent polarity results in a better defined long wavelength absorption band (λmax = 309 nm) and a hypsochromic shift in emission maxima (λem = 421 nm), which is associated with a hypochromic effect (IWater/Dioxane = 3) (Figure 2, Table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Absorption (dashed) and emission (solid) spectra of 5 in water (blue), methanol (green), dichloromethane (orange) and dioxane (red) at 2.4 × 10−5 M.

Table 1.

Photophysical properties of nucleoside 5 in various solvents.20

Solvent λabs (nm) λem (nm) Φ I normalized
Water 310 443 0.020 1.00
Methanol 305 439 0.011 0.70
Dichloromethane 309 439 0.009 0.54
Dioxane 309 421 0.006 0.33

Emission spectra of 5 in dioxane-water mixtures provide a more detailed view of the hypsochromic shift that arises upon decreasing the polarity of the chromophore’s microenvironment (Figure S2.1).20 Plotting the corrected emission energy maximum of 5 vs. the microenvironment polarity described by ET(30) values,22 results in a linear correlation (Figure 3).23 Stern-Volmer titrations were conducted to determine the differences between G and 8-oxoG’s quenching abilities (Figure 4). Rewardingly, while G minimally impacted the emission of 5 (Ksv = 0.004 mM−1), 8-oxoG was found to be a very effective quencher, even at low concentrations (Ksv = 16.5 mM−1).20

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Correlating emission wavelengths with microscopic polarity ET(30)22 for nucleoside 5 (filled circles and green line)20 and interpolation of corrected emission maxima23 of duplexes containing 5 (arrows).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Steady-state Stern-Volmer plot for the titration of 5 with 8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (stars, black dashed line), dGMP (X) and TMP (open circles). Error bars (dGMP and TMP) and data (dAMP and dCMP) have been omitted for clarity (Figure S3.1, Table S3.1).20

To investigate the potential of the emissive nucleoside to photophysically discriminate between G, 8-oxoG and T, an oligonucleotide that contains 5 at a central position was synthesized using 10 and standard solid-phase synthesis protocols (Figure 5).20 All modified oligonucleotides were characterized using MALDI TOF MS.20 Since modified C residues can, in principle, deaminate to yield the corresponding U derivatives, special care was taken to unequivocally verify the presence of 5 and absence of 2 in the modified oligonucleotide 11. Enzymatic digestion reactions, followed by HPLC analysis against all authentic nucleosides verified the presence of intact 5 and absence of 2 in the modified oligonucleotide 11 (Figure S6.1, Table S6.1).20

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Oligonucleotide sequences where Y = 8-oxoG.

Oligonucleotide 11, containing the furan functionalized dC 5 was hybridized to three complementary oligonucleotides that contain either G (oligo 12), 8-oxoG (oligo 13) or T (oligo 14) opposite the emissive nucleotide (Figure 5). Thermal denaturation (Table 2) and CD studies show no appreciable difference between the modified (1112, 1113 and 1114) and unmodified duplexes (1512, 1513 and 1514, respectively) suggesting the small furan modification does not disrupt duplex formation, stability or structure (Figure S8.1 and S9.1).20

Table 2.

Thermal denaturation of control and modified oligonucleotides.

Duplexa TmTmb) (°C) 100 mM NaCl TmTmb) (°C) 500 mM NaCl
1512 51.8 59.2
1513 47.7 55.2
1514 34.5 41.2
1112 51.5 (−0.3) 59.0 (−0.2)
1113 47.1 (−0.6) 54.5 (−0.7)
1114 34.7 (+0.2) 42.0 (+0.8)
a

1.0 × 10−6 M duplex DNA aqueous buffer pH = 7.0.

b

ΔTm = modified = unmodified.

The emission spectra of the furan dC containing duplexes, in both low (100 mM) and elevated (500 mM) ionic strength are shown in Figure 6.23 While the perfect duplex 1112, where G is placed opposite 5, is significantly emissive, placing 5 opposite 8-oxoG (1113) leads to considerable emission quenching (ca. two-fold), as hypothesized. Nucleoside 5 therefore clearly distinguishes between G and 8-oxoG, its oxidized product. In contrast, duplex 1114, where 5 is placed opposite T, a substantial emission enhancement (ca. four-fold compared to 1113) is observed (Figure 6, Table 3). Nucleoside 5 thus reports the presence of T, the ultimate transversion mutation product resulting from G oxidation to 8-oxoG, via enhanced emission. These observations, illustrating signature emission profiles for duplexes containing G, 8-oxoG and T, suggest that the furan-modified dC nucleoside 5 could be utilized to follow, in vitro, DNA damage and its repair via this pathway using such emissive oligonucleotides.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Steady state emission spectra of oligonucleotides 1112 (5•G - blue), 1113 (5•8-oxoG - red) and 1114 (5•T - orange) at 5.0 × 10−6 M in 1.0 × 10−2 M phosphate aqueous buffer pH = 7.0 containing 1.0 × 10−1 M NaCl (solid) and at 4.6 × 10−6 M in 1.0 × 10−2 M phosphate aqueous buffer pH = 7.0 containing 5.0 × 10−1 M NaCl (dashed).20

Table 3.

Emission maxima of modified duplexes in phosphate buffers at different NaCl concentrations.

Duplex λem/nm (cm−1) 100 mM NaCl Intensity at λem/au λem/nm (cm−1) 500 mM NaCl Intensity at λem/au
1112 439 (22,779) 1.00 440 (22,727) 1.00
1113 435 (22,989) 0.52 437 (22,883) 0.55
1114 446 (22,422) 2.05 447 (22,371) 2.15

The observed fluorescence quenching of 5 by 8-oxoG can be understood by the lower redox potential of 8-oxoG and concomitant higher potency as an excited state quencher compared to G (Figure 4). Several observations collectively suggest that the substantial fluorescence enhancement observed for the 5•T mismatch in 1114 is due to exposure of the emissive nucleoside to a more polar environment, likely extrahelical. Thermal denaturation data illustrates that the dC/T containing duplex 1514 (as well as the analogous modified duplex 1114) are the least stable (Table 2). This is consistent with previous observations illustrating this particular dual pyrimidine mismatch to be rather unfavorable,24 therefore suggesting a local structural perturbation. Fluorescence experiments carried out at elevated ionic strengths (500 mM) for all duplexes resulted in similar observations (Figure 6), rendering the potential higher abundance of the more emissive single strand due to poor hybridization unlikely.20

Further support for the proposed extrahelical residency of the fluorescent nucleobase is obtained by interpolating the emission energy of modified duplexes containing 5 and environmental polarity using the linear correlation shown above (Figure 3, Table 3). The emission spectra of the furanyl modified duplexes 1112 and 1113, where furanyl dC 5 can pair in a Watson–Crick fashion, display emission maximum that correlate to relatively apolar environments (Figures 3 and 6, Table 3), while duplex 1114, where furanyl dC 5 is unable to pair in a W-C fashion with T, shows a red shifted emission maximum that correlates to a polar environment, in agreement with an extrahelical disposition.

In summary, we have shown that an isomorphic fluorescent nucleoside 5, which upon incorporation results in no observable perturbation of the duplex shape and stability, is a valuable probe for the detection of G, 8-oxoG and its transverse mutation product T by eliciting markedly different emission intensities in conjunction with changes in emission maxima. The effective synthesis and incorporation of 5 could facilitate rapid and non-destructive real-time fluorescence-based methods for the in vitro monitoring of this DNA damage pathway.25

Supplementary Material

1_si_001. Supporting Information Available.

Experimental procedures, spectra, oligonucleotide digestion, thermal denaturation and CD studies.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Institutes of Health (GM069773) for support.

References

  • 1.(a) Beckman KB, Ames BN. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:19633–19636. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.32.19633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Burrows CM, Muller J. Chem Rev. 1998;98:1109–1152. doi: 10.1021/cr960421s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bjelland S, Seeberg EM. Mutat Res. 2003;531:37–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Cadet J, Douki T, Gasparutto D, Ravanat JL. Mut Res. 2003;531:5–23. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Greenberg MM. Biochem Soc Trans. 2004;32:46–50. doi: 10.1042/bst0320046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Neeley WL, Essigmann JM. Chem Res Toxicol. 2006;19:491–505. doi: 10.1021/tx0600043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Cooke MS, Evans MD. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13535–13536. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706878104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Ames BN, Shigenaga MK, Hagen TM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:7915–7922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.7915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Loft S, Poulsen HE. J Molec Medicine. 1996;74:297–312. doi: 10.1007/BF00207507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wiseman H, Halliwell B. Biochem J. 1996;313:17–29. doi: 10.1042/bj3130017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Klaunig JE, Kamendulis LM. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004;44:239–267. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Hirano T. J Radiat Res. 2008;49:329–340. doi: 10.1269/jrr.08049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leonard GA, Guy A, Brown T, Teoule R, Hunter WN. Biochemistry. 1992;31:8415–8420. doi: 10.1021/bi00151a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wood ML, Dizdaroglu M, Gajewski E, Essigmann JM. Biochemistry. 1990;29:7024–7032. doi: 10.1021/bi00482a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.For recent reviews, see: Fromme JC, Verdine GL. Adv Protein Chem. 2004;69:1–41. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3233(04)69001-2.David SS, O’Shea VL, Kundu S. Nature. 2007;447:941–950. doi: 10.1038/nature05978.
  • 6.8-oxoG’s low cellular abundance, complex localization and chemical degradation pathways make the development of small probes for its intracellular detection a formidable task.
  • 7.(a) Shigenaga MK, Ames BA. Free Radic Biol Med. 1991;10:211–216. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(91)90078-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Muller JG, Duarte V, Hickerson RP, Burrows CJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:2247–2249. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.9.2247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ropp PA, Thorp HH. Chem Biol. 1999;6:599–605. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(99)80111-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Pouget JP, Douki T, Richard MJ, Cadet J. Chem Res Toxicol. 2000;13:541–549. doi: 10.1021/tx000020e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Soultanakis RP, Melamede RJ, Bespalov IA, Wallace SS, Beckman KB, Ames BN, Taatjes DJ, Janssen-Heininger YM. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;28:987–998. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(00)00185-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Persinger RL, Melamede R, Bespalov I, Wallace S, Taatjes DJ, Janssen-Heininger Y. Exp Gerontology. 2001;36:1483–1494. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(01)00134-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Gielazyn ML, Ringwoodb AH, Piegorschc WW, Stancyka SE. Mutat Res. 2003;542:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Gore MR, Szalai VA, Ropp PA, Yang IV, Silverman JS, Thorp HH. Anal Chem. 2003;75:6586–6592. doi: 10.1021/ac034918v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Dennany L, Forster RJ, White B, Smyth M, Rusling JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:8835–8841. doi: 10.1021/ja048615+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fluorescence-based kinetic analysis of 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase using tryptophan and 2-aminopurine as fluorophores has been reported; see: Kuznetsov NA, Koval VV, Nevinsky GA, Douglas KT, Zharkov DO, Fedorova OS. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:1029–1038. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605788200.
  • 9.(a) Oliveira Brett AM, Piedade JAP, Serrano SHP. Electroanal. 2000;12:969–973. [Google Scholar]; (b) Diculescu VC, Chiorcea Paquim A-M, Oliveira Brett A-M. Sensors. 2005;5:377–393. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Berger M, Anselmino C, Mouret JF, Cadet J. J Liq Chromatogr. 1990;13:929–940. [Google Scholar]; (b) Goyal RN, Dryhurst G. J Electroanal Chem. 1992;135:75–91. [Google Scholar]; (c) Yanagawa H, Ogawa Y, Ueno M. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:13320–13326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Xue L, Greenberg MM. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:7010–7011. doi: 10.1021/ja072174n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xue L, Greenberg MM. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:561–564. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Torimura M, Kurata S, Yamada K, Yokomaku T, Kamagata Y, Kanagawa T, Kurane R. Anal Sci. 2001;17:155–160. doi: 10.2116/analsci.17.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.A modified G-clamp has indeed been reported to be quenched by 8-oxoG. Its ability to detect the damaged base was limited to chloroform and micellar solutions, and no utility has been demonstrated in oligonucleotides. See: Nakagawa O, Ono S, Li Z, Tsujimoto A, Sasaki S. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:4500–4503. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700671.
  • 14.For other emissive C analogs, see: Godde F, Toulme JJ, Moreau S. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:2977–2985. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.15.2977.Wilhelmsson LM, Holmén A, Lincoln P, Nielsen PE, Nordén B. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:2434–2435. doi: 10.1021/ja0025797.Liu CH, Martin CT. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:2725–2731. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108856200.Okamoto A, Tainaka K, Saito I. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:4972–4973. doi: 10.1021/ja034090u.Berry DA, Jung KY, Wise DS, Sercel AD, Pearson WH, Mackie H, Randolph JB, Somers RL. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:2457–2461.Dash C, Rausch JW, Le Grice SFJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1539–1547. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh307.Engman KC, Sandin P, Osborne S, Brown T, Billeter M, Lincoln P, Nordén B, Albinsson B, Wilhelmsson LM. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:5087–5095. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh844.Tinsley RA, Walter NG. RNA. 2006;12:522–529. doi: 10.1261/rna.2165806.Marti AA, Jockusch S, Li ZM, Ju JY, Turro NJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:e50. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl134.Wojciechowski F, Hudson RHE. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12574–12575. doi: 10.1021/ja804233g.
  • 15.Conjugating furan to a dU core has generated an emissive analog that positively responds to the presence of abasic sites in DNA; see: Greco NJ, Tor Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:10784–10785. doi: 10.1021/ja052000a.Greco NJ, Tor Y. Nature Protocols. 2007;2:305–316. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.464.
  • 16.Srivatsan SG, Greco NJ, Tor Y. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:6661–6665. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.(a) Greco NJ, Tor Y. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:3515–3527. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.01.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tor Y, Del Valle S, Jaramillo D, Srivatsan SG, Rios A, Weizman H. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:3608–3614. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.(a) Tor YSG. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:2044–2053. doi: 10.1021/ja066455r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Srivatsan SG, Tor Y. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:3601–3607. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.01.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Srivatsan SG, Tor Y. Nature Protocols. 2007;2:1547–1555. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li SN, Piccirilli JA. J Org Chem. 2004;69:4751–4759. doi: 10.1021/jo0495337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.See Supporting Information for experimental details.
  • 21.Note that, although relatively low, this is easily detected by standard benchtop fluorimeters with excellent signal to noise.
  • 22.Reichardt C. Chem Rev. 1994;94:2319–2358. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fluorescence spectra were corrected according to: I(ν) = λ2I(λ). See Lakowicz, J. R. Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, 2nd ed., Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, 1999.
  • 24.(a) Aboulela F, Koh D, Tinoco I., Jr Nucleic Acids Res. 1985;13:4811–4824. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.13.4811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Allawi HT, SantaLucia J., Jr Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:2694–2701. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.11.2694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hobza P, Sponer J. Chem Rev. 1999;99:3247–3276. doi: 10.1021/cr9800255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.While individual steps (e.g., G to 8oxoG, or 8OxoG to T) can be monitored using appropriate calibration, to globally follow this pathway, an independent method, estimating the relative damaged/mutant population, might be needed.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001. Supporting Information Available.

Experimental procedures, spectra, oligonucleotide digestion, thermal denaturation and CD studies.

RESOURCES