Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1967 Mar;93(3):1137–1142. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.3.1137-1142.1967

Large Bodies of Mycoplasma and L-Form Organisms1

K S Kang a,2, L E Casida Jr a
PMCID: PMC276563  PMID: 6025418

Abstract

The large bodies of various Mycoplasma and L-form organisms were studied by ultraviolet fluorescence microscopy of preparations stained with various fluorochromes. Primuline and Thioflavine S specifically stained the outer portion or rim of the large bodies, and the fluorescence characteristics of the stained bodies differed from those for other microorganisms and for spheroplasts and protoplasts. Small granular structures similar in size and morphology to minimal reproductive units were observed within some of the large bodies by phase microscopy and by fluorescence microscopy with acridine orange or Coriphosphine O. Micromanipulation probing of the large bodies revealed their elastic nature; many of the large bodies could be subdivided into two or more smaller circular bodies, each retaining the fluorescence staining properties of the parent body. Under these conditions, however, a few of the large bodies were ruptured, leaving the stainable outer boundary area as a stable residual structure. The large bodies were somewhat resistant to various rigorous treatments normally employed to eliminate viability of Mycoplasma and L-form cultures. Structures similr to large bodies were observed in various natural tissues, and structures resembling large bodies in size, morphology, fluorescence staining characteristics, and reaction to micromanipulation probing were reconstructed from an acetone extract of egg yolk. Overall, the large bodies of Mycoplasma and L-form organisms appeared to be structures resulting from accumulations of metabolic by-products and medium components within or on which minimal reproductive units had become entrapped, although it could not be ruled out that they might be defined structures specifically formed during culture as protective lipoidal sacs for the minimal reproductive units.

Full text

PDF
1137

Images in this article

1138Image
on p.1138
1139Image
on p.1139

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALTENBERN R. A., LANDMAN O. E. Growth of L-forms of Proteus mirabilis in liquid media. J Bacteriol. 1960 Apr;79:510–518. doi: 10.1128/jb.79.4.510-518.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ALTENBERN R. A. Reversion of L forms and spheroplasts of Proteus mirabilis. J Bacteriol. 1963 Feb;85:269–272. doi: 10.1128/jb.85.2.269-272.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson D. R., Barile M. F. Ultrastructure of Mycoplasma hominis. J Bacteriol. 1965 Jul;90(1):180–192. doi: 10.1128/jb.90.1.180-192.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BANDUR B. M., DIENES L. L FORMS ISOLATED FROM A STRAIN OF SERRATIA. J Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86:829–836. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.829-836.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CASIDA L. E., Jr ABUNDANT MICROORGANISM IN SOIL. Appl Microbiol. 1965 May;13:327–334. doi: 10.1128/am.13.3.327-334.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CASIDA L. E., Jr On the isolation and growth of individual microbial cells from soil. Can J Microbiol. 1962 Feb;8:115–119. doi: 10.1139/m62-015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DIENES L. Controversial aspects of the morphology of PPLO. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960 Jan 15;79:356–368. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb42696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FRASER D., MAHLER H. R. The effects of nucleases on the reproduction of T3 bacteriophage in protoplasts of Escherichia coli. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1957 Jul;69:166–177. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(57)90483-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FREUNDT E. A. Morphology and classification of the PPLO. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960 Jan 15;79:312–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb42693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FREUNDT E. A. The nature of the large bodies in the peripneumonia organism (Micromyces peripneumoniae bovis). Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1952;31(4):560–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HIJMANS W., KASTELEIN M. J. The production of L forms of enterococci. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960 Jan 15;79:371–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb42698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LIEBERMEISTER K. Morphology of the PPLO and L forms of Proteus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960 Jan 15;79:326–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb42694.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MADOFF S. Isolation and identification of PPLO. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960 Jan 15;79:383–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb42702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. RAZIN S. FACTORS INFLUENCING OSMOTIC FRAGILITY OF MYCOPLASMA. J Gen Microbiol. 1964 Sep;36:451–459. doi: 10.1099/00221287-36-3-451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Razin S., Cosenza B. J., Tourtellotte M. E. Variations in Mycoplasma morphology induced by long-chain fatty acids. J Gen Microbiol. 1966 Jan;42(1):139–145. doi: 10.1099/00221287-42-1-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Razin S., Tourtellotte M. E., McElhaney R. N., Pollack J. D. Influence of lipid components of Mycoplasma laidlawii membranes on osmotic fragility of cells. J Bacteriol. 1966 Feb;91(2):609–616. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.2.609-616.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stolp H., Starr M. P. Bacteriolysis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1965;19:79–104. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.19.100165.000455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES