Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1967 Mar;93(3):1143–1159. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.3.1143-1159.1967

Chemical, Biological, and Structural Properties of Stable Proteus L Forms and Their Parent Bacteria

C Weibull a,1, W D Bickel a, W T Haskins a, K C Milner a, E Ribi a
PMCID: PMC276564  PMID: 4960919

Abstract

Proteus L forms were disrupted by osmotic shock, and the sedimentable material present in the homogenate was further fragmented in a Sorvall pressure cell. The pressure cell was also used for disrupting normal Proteus cells. The homogenates obtained were fractionated by differential centrifugation. Purified endotoxins were isolated from the major fractions by phenol extraction. Material extracted with phenol from the membrane fraction of the L forms was about as toxic and pyrogenic on a weight basis as the typical enterobacterial endotoxins isolated from cell walls of normal bacteria. The yield of extract from L forms was about one-third of that from an equal weight of normal bacteria. No differences in the gross chemical composition of the phenol extracts from the L forms and the normal cells could be ascertained. A close serological relationship existed between extracts obtained from two L forms and their respective parent bacteria, but no such relationship was found in the case of the third L form studied and its parent bacterium. Diaminopimelic acid was not detected in the membranes of the L forms, but these membranes contained most of the succinic dehydrogenase of the organisms. Only small amounts of this enzyme were present in the wall fraction of normal bacteria. The data obtained suggest that precursors of the Proteus endotoxins are formed either in the soluble protoplasm of normal cells and L forms or at sites on the membrane from which they are readily liberated into the protoplasm, whereas the final steps of the synthesis of these toxins take place at the cytoplasmic membrane. In normal cells, much endotoxin is transported to and concentrated in the walls.

Full text

PDF
1143

Images in this article

1146Image
on p.1146
1147Image
on p.1147
1153Image
on p.1153
1154Image
on p.1154
1154Image
on p.1154
1155Image
on p.1155
1155Image
on p.1155

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANACKER R. L., FINKELSTEIN R. A., HASKINS W. T., LANDY M., MILNER K. C., RIBI E., STASHAK P. W. ORIGIN AND PROPERTIES OF NATURALLY OCCURRING HAPTEN FROM ESCHERICHIA COLI. J Bacteriol. 1964 Dec;88:1705–1720. doi: 10.1128/jb.88.6.1705-1720.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anacker R. L., Bickel W. D., Haskins W. T., Milner K. C., Ribi E., Rudbach J. A. Frequency of occurrence of native hapten among enterobacterial species. J Bacteriol. 1966 Apr;91(4):1427–1433. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.4.1427-1433.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BURTON K. A study of the conditions and mechanism of the diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem J. 1956 Feb;62(2):315–323. doi: 10.1042/bj0620315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CAREY W. F., BARON L. S. Comparative immunologic studies of cell structures isolated from Salmonella typhosa. J Immunol. 1959 Nov;83:517–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DASINGER B. L., SUTER E. Endotoxic activity of L-forms derived from Salmonell paratyphi B. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1962 Nov;111:399–400. doi: 10.3181/00379727-111-27804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DEPETRIS S. ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE CELL WALL OF ESCHERICHIA COLI. J Ultrastruct Res. 1965 Apr;12:247–262. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(65)80098-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DIENA B. B., WALLACE R., GREENBERG L. IMMUNOLOGIC STUDIES OF GLYCINE-INDUCED SPHEROPLASTS OF SALMONELLA TYPHI. Can J Microbiol. 1964 Aug;10:555–560. doi: 10.1139/m64-070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DIENES L., WEINBERGER H. J., MADOFF S. Serological reactions of L type cultures isolated from proteus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1950 Nov;75(2):409–412. doi: 10.3181/00379727-75-18213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FINKELSTEIN R. A. OBSERVATIONS ON MODE OF ACTION OF ENDOTOXIN IN CHICK EMBRYOS. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1964 Mar;115:702–707. doi: 10.3181/00379727-115-29012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Frank H., Dekegel D. Zur Interpretation von Zellwandstrukturen in Dünnschnitten gram-negativer Bakterien. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1965 Dec;198(1):81–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HASKINS W. T., LANDY M., MILNER K. C., RIBI E. Biological properties of parent endotoxins and lipoid fractions, with a kinetic study of acid-hydrolyzed endotoxin. J Exp Med. 1961 Nov 1;114:665–684. doi: 10.1084/jem.114.5.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUGHES D. E. The bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. J Gen Microbiol. 1962 Sep;29:39–46. doi: 10.1099/00221287-29-1-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KELLENBERGER E., RYTER A., SECHAUD J. Electron microscope study of DNA-containing plasms. II. Vegetative and mature phage DNA as compared with normal bacterial nucleoids in different physiological states. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Nov 25;4(6):671–678. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.6.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KOTELKO K. [Essay with the production of Boivin's antigen from stable forms of Proteus mirabilis L. Report I]. Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 1960;12:159–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kotelko K., Lüderitz O., Westphal O. Vergleichende Untersuchungen an Antigenen von Proteus mirabilis und einer stabilen L-Form. Biochem Z. 1965 Dec 1;343(3):227–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MILNER K. C., ANACKER R. L., FUKUSHI K., HASKINS W. T., LANDY M., MALMGREN B., RIBI E. SYMPOSIUM ON RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE OF MICROORGANISMS TO THEIR IMMUNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES. III. STRUCTURE AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF SURFACE ANTIGENS FROM GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA. Bacteriol Rev. 1963 Dec;27:352–368. doi: 10.1128/br.27.4.352-368.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MORRISON T. H., WEIBULL C. The occurrence of cell wall constituents in stable Proteus L forms. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1962;55:475–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1962.tb04153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MURRAY R. G., STEED P., ELSON H. E. THE LOCATION OF THE MUCOPEPTIDE IN SECTIONS OF THE CELL WALL OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND OTHER GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA. Can J Microbiol. 1965 Jun;11:547–560. doi: 10.1139/m65-072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. NESBITT J. A., 3rd, LENNARZ W. J. COMPARISON OF LIPIDS AND LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE FROM THE BACILLARY AND L FORMS OF PROTEUS P18. J Bacteriol. 1965 Apr;89:1020–1025. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.4.1020-1025.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. OSBORN M. J. STUDIES ON THE GRAM-NEGATIVE CELL WALL. I. EVIDENCE FOR THE ROLE OF 2-KETO- 3-DEOXYOCTONATE IN THE LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE OF SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Sep;50:499–506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.50.3.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. PANOS C. STREPTOCOCCAL L FORMS - A BIOCHEMICAL SYNOPSIS. Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Jun;26:954–965. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1964.tb02969.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Panos C. STREPTOCOCCAL L-FORMS IV. : Comparison of the Metabolic Rates of a Streptococcus and Derived L-Form. J Bacteriol. 1962 Nov;84(5):921–928. doi: 10.1128/jb.84.5.921-928.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pollack J. D., Razin S., Pollack M. E., Cleverdon R. C. Fractionation of mycoplasma cells for enzyme localization. Life Sci. 1965 May;4(9):973–977. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(65)90200-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. RIBI E., HASKINS W. T., LANDY M., MILNER K. C. Preparation and host-reactive properties of endotoxin with low content of nitrogen and lipid. J Exp Med. 1961 Nov 1;114:647–663. doi: 10.1084/jem.114.5.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. ROBERTSON J. D. The ultrastructure of cell membranes and their derivatives. Biochem Soc Symp. 1959;16:3–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. SALTON M. R. The anatomy of the bacterial surface. Bacteriol Rev. 1961 Jun;25:77–99. doi: 10.1128/br.25.2.77-99.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. VOLKIN E., COHN W. E. Estimation of nucleic acids. Methods Biochem Anal. 1954;1:287–305. doi: 10.1002/9780470110171.ch11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. WEIBULL C., BECKMAN H., BERGSTROM L. Localization of enzymes in Bacillus megaterium, strain M. J Gen Microbiol. 1959 Jun;20(3):519–531. doi: 10.1099/00221287-20-3-519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. WEIBULL C., BECKMAN H. Growth of bacterial L forms and bacterial protoplasts. J Bacteriol. 1960 May;79:638–649. doi: 10.1128/jb.79.5.638-649.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. WEIBULL C. Chemical analyses elucidating the structure of bacterial L forms. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1958;42(4):324–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1958.tb01746.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weibull C. Structure of bacterial L forms and their parent bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1965 Nov;90(5):1467–1480. doi: 10.1128/jb.90.5.1467-1480.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES