Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1967 May;93(5):1527–1533. doi: 10.1128/jb.93.5.1527-1533.1967

Response of Intracellular Proteolysis to Alteration of Bacterial Protein and the Implications in Metabolic Regulation

Martin J Pine 1
PMCID: PMC276644  PMID: 4960929

Abstract

An assessment has been made of the extent to which the breakdown of microbial cellular proteins is regulated by their metabolic state or function. For this purpose, a number of agents and conditions that alter the synthesis, structure, or utility of cellular protein were examined for the effect on their lability. In Escherichia coli, 5-fluorouracil, p-fluorophenylalanine, norleucine, canavanine, thienylalanine, and puromycin, which engender nonfunctional cellular protein en masse, and ultraviolet irradiation increase the breakdown rate of proteins synthesized in their presence as much as two- to threefold without altering the general capacity for proteolysis. The effects are complicated by, but experimentally distinguishable from, secondary changes in proteolysis that accompany growth inhibition. In contrast, no potentiation of proteolysis is elicited by the presence of suppressor genes, by the administration of heat, or by the biosynthetic alterations attending large changes in the conditions of cultivation or by those attending bacteriophage infection. Thus, although mass perturbations in protein conformation are catabolically distinguishable, the more individual and limited conformational modifications that might occur in disuse do not appear to be the primary determinants of the protein turnover rate. In Bacillus subtilis, turnover synthesis of protein during starvation is as susceptible to treatment with actinomycin D as that during growth. Treatment alters neither the rate of intracellular proteolysis nor the catabolic pattern of the modicum of proteins that are still synthesized. It is concluded that there is no correlation between metabolic stability of protein and the stability of its messenger ribonucleic acid.

Full text

PDF
1527

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. KOCH A. L. The inactivation of the transport mechanism for beta-galactosides of Escherichia coli under various physiological conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 Jan 21;102:602–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb13663.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. LEVINTHAL C., KEYNAN A., HIGA A. Messenger RNA turnover and protein synthesis in B. subtilis inhibited by actinomycin D. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Sep 15;48:1631–1638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.9.1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MANDELSTAM J. Turnover of protein in growing and non-growing populations of Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 1958 May;69(1):110–119. doi: 10.1042/bj0690110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MORGAN J. F., MORTON H. J., PARKER R. C. Nutrition of animal cells in tissue culture; initial studies on a synthetic medium. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1950 Jan;73(1):1–8. doi: 10.3181/00379727-73-17557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pine M. J. Heterogeneity of protein turnover in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Jul 8;104(2):439–456. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(65)90349-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pine M. J. Metabolic control of intracellular proteolysis in growing and resting cells of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1966 Oct;92(4):847–850. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.4.847-850.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SCHIMKE R. T., SWEENEY E. W., BERLIN C. M. THE ROLES OF SYNTHESIS AND DEGRADATION IN THE CONTROL OF RAT LIVER TRYPTOPHAN PYRROLASE. J Biol Chem. 1965 Jan;240:322–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SCHIMKE R. T. THE IMPORTANCE OF BOTH SYNTHESIS AND DEGRADATION IN THE CONTROL OF ARGINASE LEVELS IN RAT LIVER. J Biol Chem. 1964 Nov;239:3808–3817. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SLY W. S., ECHOLS H., ADLER J. CONTROL OF VIRAL MESSENGER RNA AFTER LAMBDA PHAGE INFECTION AND INDUCTION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Feb;53:378–385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.53.2.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schimke R. T., Sweeney E. W., Berlin C. M. Studies of the stability in vivo and in vitro of rat liver tryptophan pyrrolase. J Biol Chem. 1965 Dec;240(12):4609–4620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Setlow R. B., Carrier W. L. Pyrimidine dimers in ultraviolet-irradiated DNA's. J Mol Biol. 1966 May;17(1):237–254. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(66)80105-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weber M. J., DeMoss J. A. The inhibition by chloramphenicol of nascent protein formation in E. coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 May;55(5):1224–1230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.55.5.1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ZAMECNIK P. C. Unsettled questions in the field of protein synthesis. Biochem J. 1962 Nov;85:257–264. doi: 10.1042/bj0850257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES