Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1967 Oct;94(4):1131–1135. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.4.1131-1135.1967

Comparison of the α-Amylase of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens

N E Welker a,1, L Leon Campbell a
PMCID: PMC276784  PMID: 4963775

Abstract

The α-amylase (α-1,4-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1) of Bacillus subtilis strain W23 is less negatively-charged than the α-amylase of B. amyloliquefaciens strain F, as determined by electrophoretic mobility in polyacrylamide gel at pH 8.6. The α-amylase of strain W23 is immunologically unrelated to the α-amylase of strain F, as judged by lack of cross-reaction in Ouchterlony immunodiffusion studies. The pH range of maximal activity for the enzyme of strain W23 was 5.7 to 6.7, with a maximum at 6.3. The pH range of activity for the α-amylase of strain F was 5.5 to 6.5, with a maximum at 5.9. No significant difference was found in the effect of temperature on the activity of the α-amylase of strain W23 and strain F. α-Amylase production by strain W23 occurs throughout the 7-hr growth period, whereas enzyme production by strain F does not begin until the culture enters the stationary phase of growth. The total amounts of enzyme produced by strains W23 and F after 7 hr of growth were 0.3 and 25.5 units/ml, respectively.

Full text

PDF
1131

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. COLEMAN G., ELLIOTT W. H. Studies on alpha-amylase formation by Bacillus subtilis. Biochem J. 1962 May;83:256–263. doi: 10.1042/bj0830256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coleman G., Grant M. A. Characteristics of alpha-amylase formation by Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1966 Jul 16;211(5046):306–307. doi: 10.1038/211306a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FUKUMOTO J., YAMAMOTO T., TSURU D. Effects of carbon sources and base analogues of nucleic acid on the formation of bacterial amylase. Nature. 1957 Aug 31;180(4583):438–439. doi: 10.1038/180438b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GREEN D. M., COLARUSSO L. J. THE PHYSICAL AND GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF A TRANSFORMABLE ENZYME: BACILLUS SUBTILIS ALPHA-AMYLASE. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Aug 26;89:277–290. doi: 10.1016/0926-6569(64)90216-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HUNT J. A., OTTENSEN M. A comparison of three proteinases from various strains of Bacillus subtilis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 Apr 1;48:411–412. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(61)90498-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. OTTESEN M., SPECTOR A. A comparison of two proteinases from Bacillus subtilis. C R Trav Lab Carlsberg. 1960;32:63–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. POSTGATE J. R., CAMPBELL L. L. IDENTIFICATION OF COLEMAN'S SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIUM AS A MESOPHILIC RELATIVE OF CLOSTRIDIUM NIGRIFICANS. J Bacteriol. 1963 Aug;86:274–279. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.2.274-279.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith E. L., Markland F. S., Kasper C. B., DeLange R. J., Landon M., Evans W. H. The complete amino acid sequence of two types of subtilisin, BPN' and Carlsberg. J Biol Chem. 1966 Dec 25;241(24):5974–5976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. WELKER N. E., CAMPBELL L. L. EFFECT OF CARBON SOURCES ON FORMATION OF ALPHA-AMYLASE BY BACILLUS STEAROTHERMOPHILUS. J Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86:681–686. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.681-686.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Welker N. E., Campbell L. L. Unrelatedness of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1967 Oct;94(4):1124–1130. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.4.1124-1130.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES