Abstract
Patterns of susceptibility of gram-negative anaerobic bacilli to antibiotics have been found to be distinctive and of significant help in classification and identification. Five major groups of gram-negative anaerobic bacilli have been defined on the basis of morphological and biochemical criteria. Antibiotic sensitivity patterns conform to these groupings and provide additional taxonomic criteria. The Bacteroides fragilis group is resistant to penicillin G, whereas the other groups are generally sensitive. B. fragilis strains are relatively sensitive to erythromycin, whereas the Sphaerophorus necrophorus group is resistant. B. melaninogenicus strains, B. oralis, and Fusobacterium are all more sensitive to kanamycin and neomycin than the other two groups. Kanamycin is more active against Fusobacterium strains than neomycin, but less active against all other groups. Colistin or polymyxin B is useful for distinguishing between the resistant B. fragilis and the sensitive S. necrophorus. Antibiotic susceptibility determinations may be more readily performed in clinical laboratories than certain biochemical tests recommended for differentiation of the gram-negative anaerobic bacilli and may serve as helpful adjuncts to morphological and biochemical observations in classifying and characterizing these organisms. The use of standardized procedures for antibiotic susceptibility tests is essential if comparable results are to be obtained in different laboratories.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BAIRD-PARKER A. C. Isolation of Leptotrichia buccalis and Fusobacterium species from oral material. Nature. 1957 Nov 16;180(4594):1056–1057. doi: 10.1038/1801056b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BEERENS H., GUILLAUME J., PETIT H. Etude de la fermentation propionique de la L(-)thréonine par 45 souches de bactéries anaérobies non sporulées à gram négatif. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1959 Feb;96(2):211–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BERGER U. Zur Empfindlichkeit der Fusobakterien gegen einige neuere Antibiotica und Chemotherapeutica in vitro. Arch Hyg Bakteriol. 1956 Jun;140(4):288–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BURDIN J. C., DE LAVERGNE E., LE MOYNE M. T., SCHMITT J. Etude du comportement de 17 espéces anaérobies strictes vis-à-vis de 11 antibiotiques. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1956 Nov;91(5):631–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finegold S. M., Harada N. E., Miller L. G. Lincomycin: activity against anaerobes and effect on normal human fecal flora. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 1965;5:659–667. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GARROD L. P. Sensitivity of four species of bacteroides to antibiotics. Br Med J. 1955 Dec 24;2(4955):1529–1531. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4955.1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoogendijk J. L. Resistance of some strains of Bacteroides to ampicillin, methicillin and cloxacillin. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1965;31(4):383–385. doi: 10.1007/BF02045917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOESCHE W. J., SOCRANSKY S. S., GIBBONS R. J. BACTEROIDES ORALIS, PROPOSED NEW SPECIES ISOLATED FROM THE ORAL CAVITY OF MAN. J Bacteriol. 1964 Nov;88:1329–1337. doi: 10.1128/jb.88.5.1329-1337.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]