Skip to main content
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
. 2008 Mar;2(2):284–287. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200219

Blood Glucose Meters That Are Accessible to Blind and Visually Impaired Persons

Mark M Uslan 1, Darren M Burton 1, Charles W Clements 1
PMCID: PMC2771496  PMID: 19885356

Abstract

Blood glucose meters (BGMs) that can be used nonvisually or with a visual limitation were introduced in the mid-1990s, but it was not until 2006 and 2007 that a new set of meters with accessibility features were introduced: Prodigy, Prodigy Autocode, and Prodigy Voice (Diagnostic Devices, Charlotte, NC), and Advocate and Advocate Redi-Code (TaiDoc, Taiwan). Accessibility attributes of the newly introduced BGMs were tabulated, and product design features were examined and documented. The Prodigy Voice was found to be the only one of these new BGMs that is fully usable by blind and visually impaired persons.

Keywords: accessibility, blindness, blood glucose meters, diabetes, visual impairment

Introduction

Blood glucose meters (BGMs) that are accessible to blind and visually impaired persons are important because a significant segment of the population of persons with diabetes are visually impaired, that is, they report problems seeing. In 2005, fully 3.2 million adults with diabetes (aged 18 or older) reported trouble seeing even while wearing glasses or contact lenses.1 The number of visually impaired adults with diabetes has risen from 2.7 million in 1997 and has increased annually since 1999.1

Simply stated, a BGM is accessible to a blind or visually impaired person if it is designed so that the person can operate it independently. Accessibility is relative in that product a may be more accessible than product b. Product design criteria for blood glucose monitoring to be accessible to blind and visually impaired persons are of two types. First and foremost are criteria that are related to using the device nonvisually or with a visual limitation:

  1. Spoken display data.

  2. A high-contrast, large-font display.

  3. Control buttons that are both tactually identifiable and distinctive in color contrast.

  4. Test strip calibration that is accessible (e.g., automatic).

  5. An accessible operating manual [i.e., large print and in an electronic format that can be read by personal computer (PC) screen-reading/magnifying software].

  6. Accessible PC software (i.e., the format of downloading data can be read by PC screen-reading/magnifying software).

Second are design criteria related to overall convenience and ease of use. To the extent that these criteria are compromised, for instance, using an obsolete BGM platform, accessibility results in a product that is inferior in usability, even if a blind or visually impaired person can operate it independently. Examples of convenience and ease of use design criteria include the following:

  1. Highly portable.

  2. Small blood sample and no cleaning required.

  3. Easy-to-use test strips.

  4. Fast processing of results.

Older BGMs with Accessibility Features

Blood glucose meters that have met many of the design criteria related to using the device nonvisually or with a visual limitation were first introduced in the 1990s. In a 2003 analysis of BGMs on the market at the time, Uslan and colleagues2 identified three LifeScan (Milpitas, CA) BGMs that could be used with a separate speech unit, the Mini-Digi voice module. They were the One Touch SureStep, the One Touch Basic, and the One Touch Profile. Additionally, in the late 1990s, Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN) introduced the Accu-Chek Voicemate, a speech module into which the Accu-Chek Advantage BGM was docked (Figure 1). Because of the addition of the speech module, these four accessible BGM systems are bulkier, more complex, less user-friendly, and more expensive than the other contemporary but inaccessible BGMs on the market.2

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

In 2003, accessibility to BGM technology was provided by the Mini-Digi voice module (top, with the LifeScan SureStep) and the Accu-Chek Voicemate (bottom, with the Accu-Chek Advantage).

New BGMs with Accessibility Features

Although the older meters are no longer being manufactured, they were still on the market in 2007. It was not until 2006 that new products with accessibility attributes were launched. Introduced during the period between 2006 and 2007 were five Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved meters with integrated speech output. Three were manufactured by Diagnostic Devices (Charlotte, NC)—Prodigy, Prodigy Autocode, and Prodigy Voice—and two were manufactured by TaiDoc (Taiwan)—Advocate and Advocate Redi-Code (see Figure 2). There are a number of distributors of these products in the United States, including Diagnostic Devices Inc., Diabetic Supply of Suncoast, Inc., and Pharma Supply, Inc.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

BGMs with integrated speech introduced in 2006–2007: (A) Prodigy, (B) Prodigy Autocode, (C) Advocate, (D) Advocate Redi-Code, and (E) Prodigy Voice.

Table 1 presents the physical attributes of the five BGMs launched in 2006–2007 compared to the BGMs introduced in the 1990s. As might be expected, the five BGMs launched in 2006–2007 showed considerable improvement over those of the 1990s in terms of size, weight, blood sample size, and speed. The display font has remained large but contrast has not improved, a serious limitation that has been observed in all BGMs, as well as other health self-management products, such as blood pressure monitors.3

Table 1.

Physical Attributes of BGMs Introduced in 2006–2007 vs the 1990s

Prodigy Voice (Diagnostic Devices) Prodigy and Prodigy Autocode (Diagnostic Devices) Advocate and Advocate Redi-Code (TaiDoc) SureStep (LifeScan) with voice module Accu-Chek Voicemate (Roche Diagnostics)
Test strip calibration Automatic Manual for Prodigy, automatic for Prodigy Autocode Manual for Advocate, automatic for Advocate Redi-Code Manual Code key
Blood sample size (μl) 0.6 0.6 0.7 10.0 4.0
Strips with capillary action Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Alternative testing sites Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Cleaning required No No No Yes No
Response time (seconds) 6 6 7 15 26
Approximate meter size (inches: L × W × H) 3.74 × 2.17 × 0.71 3.75 × 1.8 × 1 3.5 × 1.75 × 0.75 4.5 × 2.6 × 1.8 6.5 × 3 × 2.5
Display font height (inch) 0.56 0.63 0.59 0.59 0.50
Weight (ounces) 2.7 2.8 2.5 9.8 12.5

In regard to the speech attributes of the BGMs, only the Prodigy Voice speaks all the information that the display outputs (see Table 2). While it stands out as the most accessible BGM of them all, the Prodigy Voice does not yet have a manual compatible with screen-reading software.

Table 2.

Speech Attributes of BGMs Introduced in 2006–2007 vs the 1990s

Prodigy Voice (Diagnostic Devices) Prodigy and Prodigy Autocode (Diagnostic Devices) Advocate and Advocate Redi-Code (TaiDoc) SureStep (LifeScan) with voice module Accu-Chek Voicemate (Roche Diagnostics)
Manual compatible with screen-reading software No No No No No
Spoken glucose level Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Speech support for adjusting settings, i.e., time, date, units of measurement Yes No No Yes Yes
Spoken memory data Yes No No Yes Yes
Error notifications Yes No No No No
Low battery warning Yes No No No Yes
Overall speech quality High-quality recorded human voice High-quality recorded human voice High-quality recorded human voice Lower quality synthetic speech High-quality recorded human voice

Products in the Pipeline

The SensoCard Plus, manufactured for BBI Healthcare (United Kingdom) by Electronica 77 (Hungary), is currently under review by the FDA. While it uses integrated speech and is approximately 50% smaller than the Prodigy Voice, it lacks the autocoding, adjustable volume, and headphone jack features of the Prodigy Voice. Under development by Bay Area Digital (San Francisco, CA) is a speech module designed to be compatible with the FreeStyle Freedom BGM from Abbott Laboratories (Alameda, CA).

Conclusion

Since 2006 there has been considerable improvement in the portability of accessible meters brought about by the introduction of BGM technology with integrated speech. These BGMs have also shown improvement in other design criteria related to convenience and ease of use, such as smaller blood samples and faster processing of results. The Prodigy Autocode and the Prodigy Voice also introduced automatic test strip calibration. The Prodigy Voice is the most accessible of the newly introduced BGMs, comparing favorably to the BGMs first introduced in the 1990s. While that fact is a positive development in the evolution of accessible BGMs, the Prodigy Voice is now the only accessible and up-to-date BGM usable by blind and visually impaired persons on the market. There are a few products in the pipeline. Until they become available, the Prodigy Voice is the one contemporary product that is comparable to the many off-the-shelf BGMs available to sighted persons today.

Abbreviations

BGMs

blood glucose meters

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

PC

personal computer

References

  • 1.Crude and age-adjusted prevalence of visual impairment per 100 adults with diabetes. CDC. 2007. [updated 2007 Mar 26]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/visual/fig2.htm.
  • 2.Uslan MM, Eghtesadi K, Burton D. Accessibility of blood glucose monitoring systems for blind and visually impaired people. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5(3):439–448. doi: 10.1089/152091503765691947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Uslan MM, Burton DM, Wilson TE, Taylor S, Chertow BS, Terry JE. Accessibility of home blood pressure moniters for blind and visually impaired people. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1(2):218–227. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Diabetes Technology Society

RESOURCES