Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1964 May;87(5):1192–1197. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.5.1192-1197.1964

FACTORS AFFECTING GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS L FORMS ON SEMIDEFINED MEDIUM

Robert R Banville a,1
PMCID: PMC277166  PMID: 5874541

Abstract

Banville, Robert R. (The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C.). Factors affecting growth of Staphylococcus aureus L forms on semidefined medium. J. Bacteriol. 87:1192–1197. 1964.—A semidefined agar medium was found suitable for production and cultivation of the L form of Staphylococcus aureus. In semidefined liquid medium, growth of the L form took place in the form of a sediment containing large masses of cells, but heavy and diffuse growth occurred in the same medium with 0.05% agar. The optimal pH for L-colony formation on solid medium was 6.5. More L colonies developed on 0.75% agar than at higher agar concentrations. L colonies developed in greater numbers on pour plates than on streak plates, and in some cases more L colonies appeared under anaerobic incubation. L-colony formation appeared to be inhibited by sodium citrate. The vitamin requirements of the L forms studied were similar to those of the classical form.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALTENBERN R. A., LANDMAN O. E. Growth of L-forms of Proteus mirabilis in liquid media. J Bacteriol. 1960 Apr;79:510–518. doi: 10.1128/jb.79.4.510-518.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BANDUR B. M., DIENES L. L FORMS ISOLATED FROM A STRAIN OF SERRATIA. J Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86:829–836. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.829-836.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DIENES L., SHARP J. T. The role of high electrolyte concentration in the production and growth of L forms of bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1956 Feb;71(2):208–213. doi: 10.1128/jb.71.2.208-213.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GRETLER A. C., MUCCIOLO P., EVANS J. B., NIVEN C. F., Jr Vitamin nutrition of the staphylococci with special reference to their biotin requirements. J Bacteriol. 1955 Jul;70(1):44–49. doi: 10.1128/jb.70.1.44-49.1955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KAGAN B. M., MOLANDER C. W., WEINBERGER H. J. Induction and cultivation of staphylococcal L forms in the presence of methicillin. J Bacteriol. 1962 May;83:1162–1163. doi: 10.1128/jb.83.5.1162-1163.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Knight B. C., McIlwain H. The specificity of aneurin and nicotinamide in the growth of Staph. aureus. Biochem J. 1938 Jul;32(7):1241–1251. doi: 10.1042/bj0321241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LANDMAN O. E., ALTENBERN R. A., GINOZA H. S. Quantitative conversion of cells and protoplasts of Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli to the L-form. J Bacteriol. 1958 May;75(5):567–576. doi: 10.1128/jb.75.5.567-576.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LEDERBERG J., ST CLAIR J. Protoplasts and L-type growth of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1958 Feb;75(2):143–160. doi: 10.1128/jb.75.2.143-160.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LORKIEWICZ Z., MARCINIAK B., ZELAZNA I. Wpływ niektórych czynników na powstawanie form L. Acta Microbiol Pol. 1956;5(1-2):27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MARSTON J. Cultivation of staphylococcal L forms in a liquid medium. J Bacteriol. 1961 May;81:832–833. doi: 10.1128/jb.81.5.832-833.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MARSTON J. Observations on L forms of staphylococci. J Infect Dis. 1961 Jan-Feb;108:75–84. doi: 10.1093/infdis/108.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MATTMAN L. H., TUNSTALL L. H., ROSSMOORE H. W. Induction and characteristics of staphylococcal L forms. Can J Microbiol. 1961 Oct;7:705–713. doi: 10.1139/m61-084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MEDILL M. A., O'KANE D. J. A synthetic medium for the L type colonies of Proteus. J Bacteriol. 1954 Nov;68(5):530–533. doi: 10.1128/jb.68.5.530-533.1954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Richardson G. M. The nutrition of Staphylococcus aureus. Necessity for uracil in anaerobic growth. Biochem J. 1936 Dec;30(12):2184–2190. doi: 10.1042/bj0302184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SCHOENFELD J. K. 'L' forms of Staphylococci; their reversibility; changes in the sensitivity pattern after several intermediatry passages in the "L" phase. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1959;25:325–331. doi: 10.1007/BF02542857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES