Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1482–1493. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.05.015

Trabecular Bone Structure Analysis in the Limited Spatial Resolution Regime of In Vivo MRI

Jeremy F Magland 1, Felix W Wehrli 1
PMCID: PMC2772147  NIHMSID: NIHMS80131  PMID: 19000865

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

To develop a method for processing and visualization of trabecular bone networks on the basis of MR images acquired in the limited spatial resolution regime of in vivo imaging at which trabecular thickness is comparable to voxel size.

Materials and Methods

A sequence of processing steps for analyzing the topological structure of trabecular bone networks is presented and evaluated using three types of data sets: images of synthetic structures with various levels of superimposed Gaussian noise, micro-CT images of human trabecular bone downsampled to in-vivo resolution, and in vivo micro-MR images from a prior longitudinal study investigating the structural implications of testosterone treatment of hypogonadal men. The simulated images were analyzed at a voxel size of (150 µm)3, the clinical MRI data had been acquired with 137×137×410 µm3 voxel size. The technique is a modification to the virtual bone biopsy processing chain that involves a sinc convolution step immediately preceding binarization, and employs the Manzanera-Bernard thinning algorithm for obtaining the 3D skeleton prior to topological classification. The detectability of plate and rod bone elements was also analyzed theoretically.

Results

As compared with previously published techniques, the approach produced a more accurate bone skeleton in the micro-CT and simulation experiments, with clear improvement in preservation of rod and plate elements. Simulations suggest that rods are detectable down to a diameter of approximately 50% of the MRI voxel length, whereas plates can be detected at thicknesses of 20% or more of voxel length. For in vivo studies, it was shown that the method could recover the treatment response in terms of the ensuing topological changes in patients undergoing antiresorptive treatment.

Conclusion

The algorithm for processing of in vivo micro-MR images of trabecular bone is superior to prior approaches in preserving the topology of the network in the presence of noise.

Keywords: Trabecular bone, Virtual bone biopsy, 3D skeletonization, micro-MRI

INTRODUCTION

The recognition of the role of architecture as a determinant of bone strength second in importance to density (13) has given substantial impetus toward the development of image-based methods for quantification of the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone. Since trabecular bone remodels several times faster than cortical bone, it also responds faster to hormonal changes, such as loss of estrogen following menopause (4), or intervention with pharmacologic agents (5), cyclical loading (6), etc. Trabecular bone architecture is also altered in a characteristic manner in osteoarthritis (7). A number of programs, including the proclamation of the National Bone and Joint Decade by the US Government have fostered the development of capabilities for in vivo assessment of trabecular bone architecture in recent years.

Both micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) and micro-magnetic resonance (µ-MRI) have demonstrated their potential as modalities to provide quantitative information on the bone’s microarchitecture in specimen studies at a resolution of tens of micrometers or better (8, 9). In recent years, both modalities have evolved to the stage allowing in vivo imaging of the trabecular microarchitecture at peripheral skeletal locations such as the distal radius, tibia or calcaneus at voxel sizes on the order of 80-200 µm (1015).

Bone marrow in the distal extremities is all fatty and appears bright in MR images, whereas bone appears with background intensity. In principle, this is therefore a comparatively simple system to analyze. However, the currently achievable resolution (limited by detection sensitivity in MRI and radiation dose in CT) is not sufficient to fully resolve the trabeculae. Besides partial volume blurring, the intensity histogram is broadened by noise which prevents straightforward segmentation. Other difficulties result from subtle subject movement during the scan causing blurring and artifacts, which can be corrected in part by prospective motion correction techniques involving navigators (14), or retrospectively with methods such as autofocusing (16). Several approaches have been described for processing images as a means to compute bone volume fraction (BVF) and structural describing parameters of scale such as trabecular thickness (17) or topology from images acquired in the limited spatial resolution regime of in vivo µ-MRI (18, 19). Another parameter of relevance to the bone’s mechanical behavior is structural anisotropy, which is a consequence of Wolff’s law that states that bone remodels in response to the stresses to which it is subjected (20). Of particular interest, however, is the topology of the network, for example, the knowledge of whether the bone is plate- or rod-like. A number of algorithms for quantifying such structure have been published, yielding parameters such as the structure model index (21) and digital topological parameters, include surface-to-curve ratio and erosion index (18).

In prior work from this laboratory in vivo images acquired in clinical studies have been processed by subjecting the data to a sequence of processing steps that comprise the virtual bone biopsy. These steps include motion correction (14, 16), automatic region of interest segmentation (22, 23), automatic 3D registration (24, 25) (for longitudinal studies), correction for intensity inhomogeneity and bone volume fraction map (26, 27), fuzzy distance transform (17) (for computing trabecular thickness), subvoxel processing (28), thresholding, and finally digital topological analysis in which each voxel in the bone network is classified as belonging to a surface, curve, or their intersections (18). While the method has been successful in distinguishing subjects with fractures from those without fractures (29) and quantifying the response to treatment (30), we encountered some difficulties and limitations of the current algorithms. Specifically, the thresholding step (i.e. converting from grayscale to binary data) is problematic, leading to artifactual branches in the 3D skeleton, and ultimately to errors in the measured topological parameters.

In this paper we introduce a new substantially improved processing cascade for the virtual bone biopsy, where the steps surrounding binarization are replaced by a more robust chain of operations. Subvoxel processing is replaced by simple 3D sinc interpolation, and we demonstrate how this approach results in a cleaner (and readily analyzable) binary volume input to skeletonization. Furthermore, we precede the digital topological analysis step by the Manzanera-Bernard skeletonization procedure (31), a robust thinning algorithm that has been shown to preserve topology as well as geometric features of the binary volume.

We show, by direct comparison with the original method, the qualitative improvement on the basis of simulated MR images obtained from synthetic plate and rod structures as well as high resolution µ-CT images of trabecular bone specimens. Furthermore, we derive a method for determining sensitivity of the technique, in terms of the size of the smallest detectable trabecular plates, rods, and perforations in plates. We apply the new processing to in vivo MR images and provide evidence that the virtual bone biopsy can accurately and reproducibly distinguish the 3D trabecular architecture in clinical situations. Finally we show, by reprocessing data from a previously published clinical study, that the new processing system is sensitive enough to detect small changes in trabecular architecture in response to drug intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All processing algorithms and simulations were implemented in C++ and executed using ChainLink (http://chainlink.sourceforge.net), a user interface for calling C++ code from Matlab-style scripts, developed by one of the authors (JFM).

A. Partial Volume Effects and Sinc Interpolation

Partial volume blurring occurs when the voxel size is on the same scale (or larger than) the underlying structure. In the case of trabecular bone MRI, it means that voxels cannot be strictly classified as containing either pure bone or pure marrow. Instead, most voxels have a grayscale value roughly representing the fraction of the voxel occupied by bone (unlike in CT, higher MRI signal indicates more marrow, and hence less bone). As mentioned in the introduction, existing algorithms for skeletonization and topological classification of trabecular bone networks require binary input data. It is therefore necessary for the grayscale MRI data to be converted into a 3D binary volume (i.e. consisting of zeros and ones). The simplest procedure to achieve this is by thresholding, so that voxels with signal intensity below a user-determined value are classified as bone. Due to artifactual intensity variations across the volume of interest (such as resulting from the inhomogeneous reception profile of surface coils), the threshold level should have a spatial dependence. Various local threshold methods exist to effectively deal with this problem (see, for example (26)).

Even in the ideal case (of no intensity variations or measurement noise), simple thresholding is not adequate for generating a binary volume because it results in loss of information and topological misclassification. The fallacy of arbitrarily setting an intensity threshold for binarization is illustrated in Fig. 1 with a simulated MR image of a synthetic structure consisting of two plates and three rods. While the resolution (150 µm isotropic) is sufficient to resolve the individual elements, the thresholding step results in a very crude 3D representation of the object, notably a disconnection of two of the rods and breaking the object into two parts, thus altering the structure’s topology.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Synthetic structure mimicking trabecular bone. Two parallel plates (spacing of 880 µm) interconnected by three rods with thicknesses 150 µm (top and bottom) and 85 µm (middle); (b) Simulated (noiseless) image of a section parallel to the plates bisecting the object at a resolution 150×150×150 µm3. The slice is parallel to (and in between) the two plates. (c) 3D volume obtained by thresholding the simulated 3D MRI dataset at 80% of the marrow level, demonstrating that simple thresholding is not adequate for analyzing topological structure; (d), (f), and (h) are subvoxel processed image sections (parallel to and in between the two plates), and (e), (g), and (i) are the corresponding volumes obtained by thresholding at 80%; (j) Section of the data set sinc interpolated by 6×6×6 and apodized using a 3D Fermi filter with 20% transition width; (k) 3D volume obtained from (j) using a threshold at 80%.

An alternative to a simple threshold is the subvoxel processing technique (28). This procedure involves subdividing each image voxel into a number of smaller pieces, called subvoxels. The cumulative bone volume fraction (as given by the grayscale intensity) is preserved within each original voxel and is distributed among the subvoxels in a manner depending on the surrounding grayscale values. In this way the compactness of the bone is used to effectively boost resolution. While subvoxel processing has been successfully applied to in-vivo MRI data in the authors’ laboratory (see, for example (32) for a recent review), the technique has two major limitations. One is that it involves two rather arbitrary thresholding steps before subdivision to separate out the pure marrow voxels, and then again after subdivision to generate the binary volume. The second difficulty is that the theory of subvoxel processing relies on the assumption that the grayscale intensity is proportional to the amount of marrow in a voxel. Even in the noiseless situation this is not the case since the signal intensity in MRI is the result of a sinc convolution of the spin-density function.

Another method for dealing with the partial volume effect is sinc interpolation, also known as voxel shifting or zero padding in Fourier space (33). This technique has been used extensively to improve the appearance of MR images, particularly in the context of magnetic resonance angiography (34, 35), where the blood vessels are sparse and typically thinner than voxel diameter. Vessels located at the center of a voxel are more detectable than those located toward the edge of a voxel. Because the reconstruction lattice is arbitrary, vessel detection can be enhanced by shifting the voxels, or by increasing the density of the reconstruction grid, typically by a factor of 2 in each direction. Practically, this is achieved by zero padding in Fourier space before reconstruction using the inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT). Apodization is generally used to reduce Gibbs ringing. In this study, a Fermi filter was used with 20% transition region in all three directions.

In the present context of structural analysis of trabecular bone, sinc interpolation has other advantages besides improved appearance of small trabecular elements. Indeed, whereas using sinc interpolation factors greater than 2 do not yield much additional improvement in terms of image appearance, the use of a higher interpolation factor (e.g. 3–6 in each direction) is expected to substantially improve the quality of 3D skeleton since skeletonization algorithms perform best with a very densely sampled binary volume as input. Furthermore, as the interpolation factor increases, we approach the continuum case, where we can think of the reconstructed image as a 3D continuous function. The advantage is that we then interpret the reconstructed image as a convolution of the underlying 3D spin-density function (i.e. the complement of the trabecular bone volume) with the point-spread function (or apodized sinc kernel). We note that in practice, sinc interpolation is actually only needed up to a factor of 2 or 3 in each direction, and then further interpolation can be achieved using simple linear interpolation without incurring significant error. We also note that other interpolation schemes may also produce visually good results, but the authors prefer to use apodized sinc interpolation so that the resulting image can be readily analyzed in terms of the detectibility of ideal plates and rods, as described in Section C below.

B. VBB Processing Chain

The input to the new Virtual Bone Biopsy (VBB) data processing algorithm is a 3D grayscale image sampled at µ-MRI voxel size (150×150×150 µm3 for simulations and 137×137×410 µm3 for in vivo examples). The first step is to correct intensity inhomogeneity as it occurs, for example, when surface coils are used for detection, so that each voxel contains a fractional grayscale value where 1=100% represents the intensity of pure marrow. This is achieved using a local threshold algorithm (26). In the second step, the image is interpolated using a 3D sinc function, usually by a factor of 3×3×3 (although larger interpolation factors can be used, albeit at the expense of computation time and memory). Recall that this type of interpolation is natural for MRI, and we think of the resulting image as representing the original spin-density function convolved with an apodized 3D sinc kernel. The third step of thresholding yields a 3D binary volume that is the input to fourth step of 3D skeletonization. For this purpose we have selected an algorithm recently described by Manzanera et al (31) (henceforth referred to as the Manzanera-Bernard algorithm). This robust thinning procedure has certain desirable properties, including the preservation of connectivity and symmetric thinning (in a sense described in (31)). For binarization, we have chosen threshold level at 80% of the marrow intensity because we have found empirically that this provides accurate skeletons. However, other values can be used, and, beyond the scope of this paper, the effect of varying the threshold can be analyzed using the method described in section C. Finally, digital topological analysis (DTA) is performed on the resulting skeleton to yield topological parameters such as surface-to-curve ratio and erosion index (18). Note that because DTA requires a skeleton of single-voxel thickness (and since the Manzanera-Bernard algorithm produces a skeleton having a thickness of up to two voxels) a further DTA skeletonization is required as part of the DTA classification. Skeletonization converts trabecular plates to surfaces and rods to curves under preservation of topology. Based on the inspection of a bone voxel’s 3×3×3 neighborhood most topological classes can be uniquely determined for each bone voxel as described in detail by Saha et al (18).

C. Synthetic Plate and Rod Simulations

We now return to the previously introduced synthetic structure consisting of two plates interconnected by three rods, mimicking a small portion of trabecular bone (see Fig. 1). It was created as a binary 3D array sampled at 20×20×20 µm3 resolution. Since in MRI marrow is the signal-producing entity, voxels inside the object were set to zero, those outside to one. Although not entirely realistic, plates (typically on the order of 100–150 µm thickness) were represented as thin (150 µm) parallelepipeds, the three rods as cylinders of diameter 150 µm, 85 µm, and 150 µm. Spacing between the plates was 880 µm. To simulate the MRI acquisition process, a 3D DFT was applied to obtain k-space samples. Then a central region of k-space was extracted, and inverse DFT applied to obtain a downsampled image at 150×150×150 µm3. To reduce Gibbs ringing, the k-space data were apodized using a 3D Fermi filter with a 20% transition region. Finally, the resulting images were subjected to various versions of VBB processing, including subvoxel processing and the new processing method.

To determine the sensitivity and accuracy of the interpolation and thresholding steps of the VBB procedure, a number of additional rod and plate structures were simulated. First, a rod was modeled as an infinite cylinder, and the diameter was varied between 0 and 450 µm. For each diameter, a MRI simulation was performed as above, and the resulting image was sinc interpolated and thresholded at 80% (as in the new VBB algorithm). For each cylinder size, the apparent diameter (after thresholding) was compared against the actual diameter. A similar procedure was performed for a plate, modeled as an infinite 2D sheet with thickness ranging between 0 and 450 µm. Finally, the simulation was performed on a plate of thickness 150 µm with a circular hole of diameter ranging from 0 and 450 µm. For each size, the apparent hole diameter (after thresholding) was compared to the actual diameter.

D. MRI Simulations Based on High-Resolution μ-CT Data

Beginning with a 3D µ-CT scan acquired from a specimen of human trabecular bone core (9 mm diameter and length of the distal radial metaphysic), a simulated µ-MRI data set was created. The downsampling (from approx. 22 µm to 150 µm isotropic) was performed using the technique described in the previous section, i.e. by cropping in spatial frequency space. The data was then processed using the procedure from section B, and the resulting 3D skeleton was compared qualitatively with the original high-resolution data set to determine to what extent the trabecular topology had been preserved. To evaluate the robustness of the algorithm with respect to measurement noise, the same experiment was repeated with Gaussian noise added to the simulated k-space data prior to image reconstruction. The noise level was chosen so that the image had a realistic signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 13:1 (somewhat higher than what is typically achieved in current clinical protocols). We note that despite the fact that the simulated data was derived from an underlying µ-CT data set, the sinc kernel remains the natural choice for interpolation in the data processing chain, since downsampling was performed by cropping in Fourier space, thus mimicking acquisition in MRI.

E. In Vivo Analysis

Lastly, the performance of the new VBB processing procedure was tested by re-examining the data of a recently published clinical study (30). In brief, the original study was designed to evaluate structural implications on the trabecular bone in men with testosterone deficiency (also referred to as hypogonadism) as a result of pituitary disease and other conditions and whether the method had the sensitivity to quantify changes in architecture in response to testosterone supplementation. Ten subjects were studied at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment and the results were compared with 10 age and body-mass index matched eugonadal men (i.e. men with normal testosterone levels). The data indicated the hypogonadal men to have significantly impaired trabecular structure compared to their eugonadal peers (36) and further that treatment significantly improved the structural integrity of the trabecular network (30). The data consisted of high-resolution 3D spin-echo images of the distal tibia (3D FLASE (37)) at a voxel size of 137×137×410 µm3 in a scan time of approximately 15 minutes. The purpose of the re-examination of this data was to evaluate the sensitivity of the new processing procedure to quantify the effect of intervention in the hypogonadal group and compare the results with those obtained previously.

RESULTS

The data processing steps of the algorithm are illustrated in Fig. 2 for a typical in vivo dataset obtained from the distal tibial metaphysis at 1.5 T with a modified 3D FLASE pulse sequence (38). The entire processing cascade requires virtually no user intervention. The key step prior to intensity normalization, sinc interpolation, thresholding and skeletonization that could possibly require some user interaction is the disconnection of the trabecular region from the cortex. But even this step has recently been automated (23).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) In vivo µ-MRI of the distal tibia; (b) region of interest isolated using an automatic segmentation algorithm (23); (c) intensity normalized to remove coil shading using local threshold algorithm (26); (d) sinc interpolated by factor of 3×3×3; (e) thresholded at 80% of marrow intensity; (f) skeleton map obtained with Manzanera-Bernard algorithm (31); (g) 3D core of skeleton; (h) DTA classification showing surfaces (resulting from skeletonization of plates) in red, and curves (resulting from skeletonization of rods) in blue.

Fig. 1(d–i) shows the results of applying subvoxel processing to the simulated data from Fig. 1 using interpolation factors 2, 4, and 6. Even at the highest factor (6×6×6), the resulting volume does not satisfactorily represent the original structure. This is in part due to the pre-thresholding step that is a necessary component of the subvoxel processing algorithm. In contrast, the method of sinc interpolation (Fig. 1(j–k)) largely preserves the circular shape of the thicker rods as well as the overall structure of the model, although the thin rod (85 µm diameter) was lost. As discussed above, the resulting structure in this case is obtained from the original model via convolution by a 3D sinc kernel, and is therefore predictable. For example, it is noted that the thinnest (middle) rod is not detectable with the method, as predicted below.

The results of the simulations on individual rods, plates, and perforations are shown in Figs. 3 and 4. We note that for plates and rods with thickness on the order of the voxel dimension (i.e. 150 µm in our discussion), the apparent thickness exceeds actual thickness by approximately 75%. According to Fig. 4, rods become undetectable (i.e. are above the threshold) when the diameter falls below around half of the voxel size, whereas plates can be detected down to a thickness of 20% of voxel size.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Simulated signal profiles for rods and plates of varying thicknesses using sinc interpolation. Dotted lines show the apparent thickness after thresholding at 80% of the marrow level; (a), (b), (c), and (d) show profiles for rods (cylinders of infinite length), and (e), (f), (g), and (h) show profiles for plates (2D-infinite sheets).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Simulated apparent thickness vs. actual thickness for rods, plates, and perforations in plates when thresholded at 80% of the marrow intensity. Note that rods become undectectable when the diameter falls below around half of the voxel size, whereas plates can be detected down to a thickness of 20% of voxel size, and perforations can be detected for diameters exceeding 120% of the voxel size. As noted in the text, these numbers depend on the chosen threshold.

Simulations based on downsampling μ-CT images are shown in Fig. 5. The data indicate that much of the trabecular structure can be recovered by VBB processing, even after adding noise and downsampling to 150 µm isotropic voxels. The interpolation step, preparatory to thresholding and skeletonization, is crucial for capturing the grayscale information contained in the simulated MR image. Fig. 6 demonstrates the improvement afforded by the new processing algorithm in terms of reduction of artifactual branches in the skeleton caused by digitization and thresholding.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

VBB processing steps, with the starting point being a 3D micro-CT image dataset of trabecular bone in a tibia specimen (left), downsampled to µ-MRI resolution (150 µ m isotropic), sinc interpolated, binarized, and skeletonized as described in the text (upper double row of images). Subsequently, gaussian noise was added to the simulated MRI data, to achieve SNR of approximately 13:1 (lower double row of images). Color coding of DTA classified images: surfaces (resulting from skeletonization of plates) are red, curves (resulting from skeletonization of rods) are blue. It is visually apparent that the topology of the structure is largely preserved after downsampling to in vivo MRI resolution and addition of noise.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Skeletonized data set using (left) sub-voxel processing and DTA classification and (right) sinc interpolation and Manzanera-Bernard followed by DTA skeletonization.

The ability of the virtual bone biopsy to reproducibly track the 3D structure of bone over time is illustrated in Fig. 7 with images from a 42 year-old female subject comparing baseline to six-month follow-up. The 3D structure at each site matches in the two scans, and the VBB parameters listed in Table 1 can distinguish between the two sites.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

In vivo baseline (a) and six month follow-up (b) scans of the distal tibia of a 42 year-old woman. The 3D skeletons obtained at two different locations using the new VBB processing procedure. The trabecular bone at site #1 is considerably sparser. Note the visually apparent agreement between baseline and follow-up images.

Table 1.

Topologic Classification Parameters for Cores Shown in Fig 7 Demonstrating Reproducibility from Baseline to Follow-up

Site #1 Baseline Follow-up Site #2 Baseline Follow-up
Skeleton density 1.71% 1.74% 2.99% 3.14%
Plate density 1.48% 1.52% 2.62% 2.79%
Rod density 0.19% 0.18% 0.28% 0.26%
Junction density 0.04% 0.04% 0.09% 0.09%

The results, in terms of two composite structural parameters (surface-to-curve ratio and erosion index), of applying the new processing algorithm to the previously published testosterone replacement study are shown in Fig. 8. The magnitude of the treatment effect increased as expected from 6 to 24 months, with statistically significant changes at the latest two time points. The p-values for 12 and 24 month changes are lower than those reported in (30) (p=0.02 at 12 months and p=0.004 at 24 months for both parameters), suggesting stronger associations than achievable with the prior processing method. The data for the (untreated) eugonadal group in whom previously no longitudinal changes were detected (30), has not been included in the present analysis.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Percent change in two composite VBB parameters for a group of ten hypogonadal men treated with testosterone over a period of two years. Both indicate an increase in surface/curve ratio as well as decrease in erosion index commensurate with an improvement in the trabecular network over time. The statistical significance for the new processing results is generally greater than that found for the previously published data (30) using the original processing algorithms.

DISCUSSION

There is compelling evidence that, compared to the reduction in bone mass and density, age and osteoporosis-related changes in the network’s topology are disproportionately large (29, 39), leading to perforations of plates and disconnections of rod-like trabeculae. Such an etiology is commensurate with the notion that plate-like bone is gradually being converted to rod-like bone, as shown in µ-CT images from iliac crest bone biopsies (10, 40). Further, in vivo image data suggest that a more plate-like architecture is biomechanically more competent than one characterized by a rod-like architecture when comparing patients with vertebral fractures with their unfractured peers (29, 41, 42). However, topological classification (e.g. the determination of whether a structure element pertains to a rod or plate) is sensitive to resolution. A narrow, ribbon-like plate may, after skeletonization be converted to either a surface or, at lower resolution, a curve. In the limit, as shown in this work, it may not be detected at all.

The robustness of the new algorithm is evident in the comparison of the downsampled and noise-corrupted images derived from a high-resolution µ-CT image of a specimen in Fig. 5, generated to mimic in vivo µ-MRI conditions. The data show that the VBB is able to recover the essential structural features. Moreover, the artifactual branches in the skeleton network (appearing in Fig. 6), which we ascribe to subvoxel processing, are not present with sinc interpolation performed in conjunction with the Manzanera-Bernard skeletonization algorithm. We expect the improved processing strategy to lead to greater accuracy in the topological counts, since such branches do not reflect true structural features.

The thinnest trabeculae typically encountered in diseased human trabecular bone may be less than 100 µm thick (43). Based on our theoretical analysis (which predicts that rods are detectable down to 50% of the voxel length), we project that an isotropic resolution on the order of 160 µm should be adequate to accurately recover the trabecular network. Of course these numbers are dependent on the chosen threshold, and the sensitivity to rods and plates could be enhanced by modifying this threshold. While Fig. 4c suggests that perforations (a common manifestation of high turn-over disease with excessive osteoclastic resorption (40)) are only detectable when their diameter exceeds 120% of the voxel length (assuming a plate thickness of 1 voxel), we expect to be able to detect a change in the VBB parameters resulting from only minor (i.e. sub-voxel) pitting throughout the volume of analysis. This is because the parameters represent a statistical average, and are therefore affected by slight variations in bone thickness. In other words, in light of noise and other factors, we must consider the conditional probability that we observe a perforation given that one exists of a particular diameter.

Although the above analysis could be used to develop a method for measuring trabecular thickness, an average thickness can be directly quantified based on the grayscale bone-volume-fraction maps, as shown previously by resorting to the fuzzy distance transform algorithm (17). However, we are primarily interested in analyzing topology, rather than structural thickness, which is known to change little in postmenopausal osteoporosis (44).

The data in Fig. 7 and Table 1 lend further credence to the power of the algorithm, showing good agreement between baseline and six-month follow-up for some of the topological parameters at two randomly selected sites, both visually and numerically. Lastly, the data of Fig. 8 show that the method is able to detect the previously observed temporal changes with high statistical significance (considering the small number of subjects studied). While the absolute values differ somewhat from those reported in (30) they are in overall agreement with each other while the quality of the images is substantially improved over that achieved with the previous processing strategy.

Clearly, more work will be required to demonstrate the improved performance, in particular the algorithm’s ability to detect small effects in response to intervention. To this end, further validation work is required to assess reproducibility and to further examine the sensitivity of the method to noise, particularly systematic or colored noise.

Currently, most imaging protocols for trabecular bone structure analysis performed in the various laboratories are based on anisotropic 3D imaging, typically performed such that the resolution along the axial direction is lower than in the transverse direction (see (32) for a review) even though isotropic resolution would be preferable. Unfortunately, the practically achievable SNR imposes limits on the voxel volumes that yield images of adequate quality in realistic scan times. Since trabeculae run preferentially along the axial (i.e. primary loading) direction, based on the present results, the algorithm is likely to accurately capture the longitudinal trabeculae, but the transverse structural elements are expected to be more prone to error. These transverse trabeculae play a crucial role in preventing fractures by acting as cross-ties between the plates, therefore their detection is important. Enhanced SNR as a result of improved coil technology and operation at higher field will likely make acquisition of images possible at isotropic resolution with a target voxel size on the order of 150µm, thus improving the detection of these transverse trabeculae.

Lastly, the algorithm is, of course, not limited to processing of MR images, although it should be noted that use of sinc interpolation is most natural in the context of MRI, and other interpolation strategies may be preferable for other modalities. The emergence of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (45) as well as multi-detector CT for structural imaging of vertebral trabecular bone (41), has substantially enlarged the field of in vivo bone structure analysis. Whereas in MR the practically achievable resolution is limited by scan time, the ultimate resolution in CT is primarily dictated by radiation dose considerations. Therefore, for both technologies there is a compelling need for improved methods to recover structural information in the regime of limited spatial resolution and SNR.

CONCLUSION

A data processing technique for analyzing 3D topology of trabecular bone images in the limited spatial resolution regime of in vivo MRI has been described. Using sinc convolution as a preparatory step to skeletonization, the method produces a well-defined and analyzable relationship between the original bone structure and the resulting 3D skeleton. The algorithm has been shown to qualitatively preserve topology in synthetic, specimen, and in vivo situations, and to preserve statistical significance in a previously analyzed clinical study.

Future work will focus on quantitative validation, exploring how sensitive the technique is to small changes in bone, and determining an optimum threshold level for various types of analyses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors are indebted to Dr. Branimir Vasilic for helpful discussions and the National Institute of Health for supporting this research (RO1 AR41443 and RO1 AR53156).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Legrand E, Chappard D, Pascaretti C, et al. Trabecular bone microarchitecture, bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in male osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2000;15:13–19. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kleerekoper M, Villanueva AR, Stanciu J, Sudhaker Rao D, Parfitt AM. The Role of Three-Dimensional Trabecular Microstructure in the Pathogenesis of Vertebral Compression Fractures. Calcified Tissue International. 1985;37:594–597. doi: 10.1007/BF02554913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Recker RR. Architecture and vertebral fracture. Calcified Tissue International. 1993;53 Suppl 1:S139–S142. doi: 10.1007/BF01673423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Genant HK, Cann CE, Ettinger B, Gordan GS. Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: a sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1982;97:699–705. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-5-699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Black DM, Greenspan SL, Ensrud KE, et al. The effects of parathyroid hormone and alendronate alone or in combination in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1207–1215. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rubin C, Turner AS, Muller R, et al. Quantity and quality of trabecular bone in the femur are enhanced by a strongly anabolic, noninvasive mechanical intervention. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:349–357. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Martel-Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, Reboul P, Pelletier JP. The role of subchondral bone in osteoarthritis. In: Sharma L, Beenbaum F, editors. Osteoarthritis: A Companion to Rheumatology. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2007. pp. 15–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wehrli FW, Ford JC, Chung HW, et al. Potential role of nuclear magnetic resonance for the evaluation of trabecular bone quality. Calcified Tissue International. 1993;53 Suppl 1:S162–S169. doi: 10.1007/BF01673429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rüegsegger P, Koller B, Muller R. A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcified Tissue International. 1996;58:24–29. doi: 10.1007/BF02509542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hildebrand T, Laib A, Muller R, Dequeker J, Ruegsegger P. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1167–1174. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gordon CL, Webber CE, Adachi JD, Christoforou N. In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure at the distal radius from high-resolution computed tomography images. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1996;41:495–508. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/3/011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gordon CL, Webber CE, Christoforou N, Nahmias C. In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure at the distal radius from high-resolution magnetic resonance images. Medical Physics. 1997;24:585–593. doi: 10.1118/1.597987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Majumdar S, Genant HK, Grampp S, et al. Correlation of trabecular bone structure with age, bone, mineral density, and osteoporotic status: in vivo studies in the distal radius using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1997;12:111–118. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Song HK, Wehrli FW. In vivo micro-imaging using alternating navigator echoes with applications to cancellous bone structural analysis. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1999;41:947–953. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199905)41:5<947::aid-mrm14>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wehrli FW, Saha PK, Gomberg BR, Song HK. Noninvasive assessment of bone architecture by magnetic resonance micro-imaging-based virtual bone biopsy. Proc IEEE. 2003;91:1520–1542. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lin W, Ladinsky GA, Wehrli F, Song HK. Image metric-based correction (autofocusing) of motion artifacts in high-resolution trabecular bone imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:191–197. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saha P, Wehrli F. Measurement of trabecular bone thickness in the limited resolution regime of in vivo MRI by fuzzy distance transform. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2004;23:53–62. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2003.819925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saha PK, Gomberg BR, Wehrli FW. Three-dimensional digital topological characterization of cancellous bone architecture. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology. 2000;11:81–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pothuaud L, Porion P, Lespessailles E, Benhamou CL, Levitz P. A new method for three-dimensional skeleton graph analysis of porous media: application to trabecular bone microarchitecture. J Microsc. 2000;199:149–161. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00725.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cowin SC. Wolff's Law of Trabecular Architecture at Remodeling Equilibrium. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 1986;108:83–88. doi: 10.1115/1.3138584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P. Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. 1997;1:15–23. doi: 10.1080/01495739708936692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vasilic B, Wehrli FW. Semi-automated algorithm for segmentation of the trabecular-bone region in micro-MR images of the distal radius and tibia; Proc. ISMRM 13th Annual Meeting; Miami, Florida: ISMRM; 2005. p. 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Magland JF, Vasilic B, Wehrli FW. Fully Automated Region of Interest Segmentation in the Virtual Bone Biopsy; ISMRM 15th Annual Meeting; Berlin, Germany: ISMRM; 2007. p. 2629. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vasilic B, Popescu AM, Bunker B, Wehrli FW. Semi-automatic method for 3D registration of trabecular bone images in serial studies; ISMRM, 12th Scientific Meeting; Kyoto, Japan: ISMRM; 2004. p. 2209. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Magland J, Vasilic B, Lin W, Wehrli FW. Automatic 3D registration of tabecular bone images using a collection of regional 2D registrations; ISMRM 14th Scientific Meeting; Seattle, WA: ISMRM; 2006. p. 219. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vasilic B, Wehrli FW. A novel local thresholding algorithm for trabecular bone volume fraction mapping in the limited spatial resolution regime of in-vivo MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005;24:1574–1585. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2005.859192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hwang SN, Wehrli FW. Estimating voxel volume fractions of trabecular bone on the basis of magnetic resonance images acquired in vivo. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology. 1999;10:186–198. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hwang SN, Wehrli FW. Subvoxel Processing: A Method for reducing partial volume blurring with application to in vivo MR images of trabecular bone. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2002;47:948–957. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wehrli FW, Gomberg BR, Saha PK, Song HK, Hwang SN, Snyder PJ. Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:1520–1531. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.8.1520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Benito M, Vasilic B, Wehrli FW, et al. Effect of testosterone replacement on bone architecture in hypogonadal men. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1785–1791. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Manzanera A, Bernard TM, Preteux P, Longuet B. N-dimensional skeletonization: a unified mathematical framework. Journal of Electronic Imaging. 2002;11:25–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wehrli FW. Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007:390–409. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kramer D, Li A, Simovsky I, Hawryszko C, Hale J, Kaufman L. Applications of voxel shifting in magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 1990;25:1305–1310. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199012000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Du YP, Parker DL, Davis WL, Cao G. Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero-filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994;4:733–741. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880040517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hylton NM, Simovsky I, Li AJ, Hale JD. Impact of section doubling on MR angiography. Radiology. 1992;185:899–902. doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.3.1438782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Benito M, Gomberg B, Wehrli FW, et al. Deterioration of trabecular architecture in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:1497–1502. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ma J, Wehrli FW, Song HK. Fast 3D large-angle spin-echo imaging (3D FLASE) Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1996;35:903–910. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910350619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Magland J, Jones C, Wald M, Wehrli FW. Spin-Echo Micro-MRI of Trabecular Bone Using an Improved 3D FLASE Sequence; Proc ISMRM, 15th Annual Meeting; Berlin, Germany: ISMRM; 2007. p. 382. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wehrli FW, Ladinsky GA, Jones C, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance detects rapid remodeling changes in the topology of the trabecular bone network after menopause and the protective effect of estradiol. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:730–740. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.080108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Borah B, Dufresne TE, Chmielewski PA, Johnson TD, Chines A, Manhart MD. Risedronate preserves bone architecture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis as measured by three-dimensional microcomputed tomography. Bone. 2004;34:736–746. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ito M, Ikeda K, Nishiguchi M, et al. Multi-Detector Row CT Imaging of Vertebral Microstructure for Evaluation of Fracture Risk. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1828–1836. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ladinsky GA, Vasilic B, Popescu AM, et al. Trabecular Structure Quantified With the MRI-Based Virtual Bone Biopsy in Postmenopausal Women Contributes to Vertebral Deformity Burden Independent of Areal Vertebral BMD. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 doi: 10.1359/JBMR.070815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aaron JE, Johnson DR, Paxton S, Kanis JA. Secondary Osteoporosis and the Microanatomy of Trabecular Bone. Clinical Rheumatology. 1989;8:84–88. doi: 10.1007/BF02207240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Parfitt AM, Mathews CHE, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1983;72:1396–1409. doi: 10.1172/JCI111096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Boutroy S, Bouxsein ML, Munoz F, Delmas PD. In Vivo Assessment of Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture by High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:6805–6815. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES