Abstract
Major breakthroughs have recently been reported that can help overcome two inherent drawbacks of NMR: the lack of sensitivity and the limited memory of longitudinal magnetization. Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) couples nuclear spins to the large reservoir of electrons, thus making it possible to detect dilute endogenous substances in magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We have designed a method to preserve enhanced (“hyperpolarized”) magnetization by conversion into long-lived states (LLS). It is shown that these enhanced long-lived states can be generated for proton spins, which afford sensitive detection. Even in complex molecules such as peptides, long-lived proton states can be sustained effectively over time intervals on the order of tens of seconds, thus allowing hyperpolarized substrates to reach target areas and affording access to slow metabolic pathways. The natural abundance carbon-13 polarization has been enhanced ex situ by almost four orders of magnitude in the dipeptide Ala-Gly. The sample was transferred by the dissolution process to a high-resolution magnet where the carbon-13 polarization was converted into a long-lived state associated with a pair of protons. In Ala-Gly, the lifetime TLLS associated with the two nonequivalent Hα glycine protons, sustained by suitable radio-frequency irradiation, was found to be seven times longer than their spin-lattice relaxation time constant (TLLS/T1 = 7). At desired intervals, small fractions of the populations of long-lived states were converted into observable magnetization. This opens the way to observing slow chemical reactions and slow transport phenomena such as diffusion by enhanced magnetic resonance.
Keywords: dynamic nuclear polarization, dissolution process, nuclear magnetic resonance, magnetic resonance imaging, metabolic pathways
One of the many advantages of magnetic resonance (MR) compared with computed tomography (CT) and imaging methods based on radioactive tracers, such as positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), lies in the ability of MR to determine both the spatial distribution of the substrates and their transformation through metabolic processes. Unfortunately, most applications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are limited to the detection of water, because other substances are not sufficiently abundant. Even with infusion of labeled substrates, chemical shift imaging (CSI) suffers from poor sensitivity. Thus, the potential to differentiate between molecules is often left unused. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and imaging (MRI) may be considerably improved by coupling the nuclear spins to electron spins via dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) (1). By enhancing the nuclear polarization of selected endogenous substances, one cannot only image their spatial distribution without background signals, but also visualize their metabolic reaction products (2). The use of hyperpolarized substrates to follow metabolic pathways should become widespread, provided nuclear magnetization can be sustained for sufficiently long times. The short T1 lifetimes of longitudinal proton magnetization constitute a serious obstacle in the way of applications of hyperpolarization to protons, so that DNP tends to be confined to the realm of nuclei with low gyromagnetic ratios. We demonstrate that significant gains in lifetimes may be obtained for protons. Increasing the lifetimes of polarized molecules leads to better spatial and temporal resolution in MRI (3).
A first type of experiments that can enhance nuclear polarization, known as in situ DNP, relies on irradiation of electron spin ESR transitions in the same magnet where NMR signal detection is performed. These experiments yield polarization enhancements via DNP using gyrotrons (4) or via the Overhauser effect (5–7). An important characteristic of these experiments is that they can be repeated within short time intervals, allowing one to improve the signal-to-noise ratio by signal averaging or to record multidimensional spectra. Another class of experiments, which have come to be known as dissolution DNP (8), relies on ex situ irradiation of the ESR transitions at a temperature of ≈1.2 K to enhance the nuclear polarization. The sample is then heated up rapidly, before its transfer from the polarizing magnet to a high-resolution magnet for NMR detection. This approach can yield enhancements of more than four orders of magnitude, but the number of observations (“scans”) is limited, and it takes several hours to build up the enhanced nuclear polarization, so that one can typically perform only one or two experiments per day. The intrinsically short lifetimes of the hyperpolarized magnetization, limited by the longitudinal relaxation time constant T1 at the temperature of the NMR detection, compel one to make use of this slowly built polarization within a time interval t < 5T1. The short lifetime of the polarization of sensitive spins is the most serious constraint on dissolution DNP experiments to this date, according to the inventors of the method (3). In this work, we show that enhanced proton polarization may be stored in so-called long-lived states (LLS) (9, 10), with lifetimes TLLS that are much longer than the proton T1, so as to relax the constraints on the interval between low-temperature prepolarization and room-temperature NMR detection.
Potential applications of dissolution DNP using long lifetimes of magnetization include mapping the slow spread of endogenous substances through organisms by angiography (3), real-time metabolic imaging (11), monitoring the flux of substrates through enzymatic processes on long time scales (12), and following slow diffusion in porous materials (13). For imaging of metabolic processes, the excitation of spin states with long lifetimes in hyperpolarized substances leads to a better contrast against the background (14). The lifetimes TLLS are more sensitive to the environment than the T1 and T2 relaxation time constants, and may thus constitute a probe for localized variations of the environment.
In this work, LLS are sustained by radio-frequency irradiation in high static magnetic fields, but a similar effect can be achieved in a vanishing magnetic field. This has potential applications for prepolarized MRI (15).
In the dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) experiment introduced by Ardenkjaer-Larsen et al. (8), which has come to be known as ex situ or dissolution DNP, the polarization from the unpaired electrons of admixed free radicals like TEMPO or trityl is transferred to nuclear spins such as those of carbon-13, yielding nuclear polarization on the order of P = (Pα − Pβ)/(Pα + Pβ) ∼ 20%. This corresponds to sensitivity enhancements of >10,000 compared with the signal obtained at room temperature in a static field B0 = 7 T. This dramatic increase in polarization makes dissolution-DNP attractive for pharmaceutical and functional studies in liquids (16). However, the time required to build up the enhanced nuclear polarization at low temperatures can be as long as several hours, and the liquid helium required to cool the samples makes the technique expensive. It is noteworthy that the enhanced nuclear spin polarization may be used for several consecutive observations, provided small flip-angle pulses (typically β = 10°) are used to convert only small fractions of the longitudinal magnetization into detectable transverse magnetization. However, the enhanced polarization must be used before it is destroyed by spin-lattice relaxation. This limits applications to studies of dynamic phenomena such as slow diffusion, flow and metabolic conversion. The remarkable sensitivity afforded by DNP may be combined with so-called “ultrafast” or “single-shot” two-dimensional spectra (17–19), and with high-resolution spectroscopy in inhomogeneous magnetic fields (20).
Long-lived states, introduced by M. H. Levitt and collaborators (9, 21), are nuclear spin configurations delocalized on two or more coupled spins that have unusually long relaxation times TLLS, which can be up to 36 times longer (22) than the spin-lattice relaxation time constant T1 of the same nuclei. The relaxation properties of LLS are favorable because these states are not affected by dipolar interactions between the spins involved. In some systems, the LLS can be boosted by magnetization transferred from para-hydrogen (23, 24). In selected molecules featuring chemically equivalent nuclei, spin states with relatively long lifetimes are believed to exist that may be converted into detectable magnetization through a hydration reaction (25).
We demonstrate here that in systems with J-coupled spins the enhanced polarization generated via dissolution DNP can be converted into LLS for safekeeping during time intervals 5TLLS of significant length, before their conversion into detectable magnetization. So far, most dissolution DNP experiments have been performed for unprotonated (e.g., carboxyl) carbon-13 nuclei in fairly small molecules. The technique is bound to evolve toward the use of molecules of increasing mass and complexity including peptides, which regulate many physiological processes, and act as endo- and paracrine signals, neurotransmitters and growth factors (26). So far, only secondary hyperpolarization (27) of peptides was achieved. It is shown here that the polarization of natural-abundance carbon-13 spins in a dipeptide can be enhanced directly by a factor close to 10,000, using dissolution DNP, and converted into long-lived states associated with protons, yielding a lifetime TLLS that is seven times longer than the longitudinal relaxation time constant T1 of the same protons. These long-lived states may be sustained using moderate radio-frequency (rf) irradiation or by removing the sample from the magnetic field, as demonstrated by the Levitt group (28), who determined lifetimes of several minutes for LLS involving a pair of nitrogen-15 nuclei in 15N2O. The ability to extract controlled amounts of the magnetization stored in long-lived states after arbitrarily chosen time intervals makes this an attractive tool to study slow metabolic reactions.
Results and Discussion
The new experiment comprises five steps (Fig. 1): (i) hyperpolarization, consisting of the creation of enhanced carbon-13 magnetization in an intermediate magnetic field (in our case, B0 = 3.35 T and T = 1.2 K) followed by rapid heating, dissolution and transfer of the polarized sample in a high-resolution magnet (in our case, B0 = 7.05 T and T = 300 K); (ii) transfer of the enhanced magnetization from carbon-13 to protons to improve the sensitivity of the subsequent detection; (iii) transformation of the enhanced proton polarization into long-lived states; (iv) sustaining these LLS; and (v) “reading out” by (partial) conversion into observable proton magnetization. The transfer of the sample between the two magnets typically lasts a few seconds, so it is advantageous to keep the magnetization on slowly relaxing “transporter spins” with low gyromagnetic ratios (such as 13C). Because of the large enhancements, isotopic enrichment is not necessary and isotopes such as nitrogen-15 or carbon-13 may be used in natural abundance, as in the present study.
The dipeptide Ala-Gly was chosen to demonstrate the experiment described above. Natural-abundance 13C nuclei (Fig. 1) were hyperpolarized as described in ref. 29 (see Methods). The long spin-lattice relaxation time constant of 13CO carbons in Gly, T1(13C) = 25.9 ± 0.2 s at 7 T and 300 K, made it possible to heat the sample from 1.2 K to ≈300 K and to transfer it from the polarizing to the high-resolution magnet in 6 s without significant loss of polarization. We estimate the signal enhancement of the polarized sample with respect to the room-temperature equilibrium signal measured in the high-resolution magnet to be at least 7,600, corresponding to a polarization P = (Pα − Pβ)/(Pα + Pβ) = 4.6% or better. (This lower-limit estimate is rough due to the poor signal-to-noise of the room-temperature reference spectrum.) The enhanced 13CO polarization is converted by a reverse INEPT (30) experiment into proton magnetization, and then into an LLS involving the two nonequivalent protons Hα1 and Hα2 of the Gly residue, sustained over a period that can be as long as T = 5TLLS, and finally transformed into detectable proton magnetization (10, 22). The two Hα protons of glycine in Ala-Gly have a difference in chemical shifts ΔνIS = 0.15 ppm = 45 Hz at 7.05 T. Only two doublets are detected, centered at the chemical shifts of the Hα1 and Hα2 protons, with a coupling constant J(Hα1, Hα2) = −17.3 Hz (Fig. 1). The lifetime of this LLS in Ala-Gly in degassed water (without radicals) is TLLS = 42.2 ± 0.1 s at 298 K and 11.4 T, i.e., much longer than the spin-lattice relaxation time T1 of the same protons. In samples stemming from the dissolution-DNP procedure this lifetime is shortened by dipolar interactions with radicals and paramagnetic oxygen. In our experiments (see Methods), we have measured TLLS(1H) = 16 ± 0.6 s and T1(1H) = 2.3 ± 0.2 s at 298 K and 7.05 T. Degassing has little effect, because the contribution of oxygen to R1 is <0.5 s−1.
Depending on the system, the T1 of the “transporter nucleus” may be either shorter or longer than the lifetime of the proton LLS. In the present case, the ratios are TLLS(1H)/T1(13C) = 0.63 and TLLS(1H)/T1(1H) = 7. Transferring the magnetization to protons obviously results in more sensitive detection. The method described in Fig. 2 allows one to convert only a fraction of proton LLS to transverse proton magnetization for detection, whereas the remaining LLS can be sustained for later observation. This would be difficult to achieve had magnetization been stored on the transporter nuclei. In molecules such as amino acids containing at least three aliphatic protons, the proton with the longest T1 may be used as transporter before creating an LLS involving all three spins. In these molecules, the T1 of the transporter is shorter than the LLS lifetime by a factor of ∼2 (31).
The pulse sequence used to transfer polarization from carbon-13 to proton spins, excite and sustain LLS is shown in Fig. 2. Once magnetization is stored as LLS, it is possible either to convert it entirely into detectable single-quantum terms (Fig. 2A) or to transfer only a fraction for detection, after which the remaining part is again sustained, to be detected at a later stage (Fig. 2 B–E). The first proton pulses in Fig. 2A saturate the “native” proton magnetization, notably in molecules that do not contain any carbon-13 isotopes. These pulses may be removed for routine applications, although they improve the accuracy of the exponential fits of TLLS decays. The refocused inverse-INEPT sequence is followed by a spin-echo τ3 − π − τ3 to continue the evolution under J(Hα1, Hα2), which started during the previous τ2 − π − τ2 interval, to generate LLS (32, 33), which are then sustained by a suitable rf irradiation (see Methods), before their conversion into detectable in-phase terms. The enhanced polarization can be converted in part from LLS to detectable terms using the sequence in Fig. 2B. The idea is to interrupt the rf irradiation during a delay pτ4 that must be a multiple of the precession period of the zero-quantum coherences, pτ4 = n/ΔνIS. After this delay, the LLS, which is comprised of a sum of zero-quantum terms (which have undergone n complete rotations), and longitudinal two-spin order terms (which do not precess) is restored, ready to be sustained again by rf irradiation. The part that has been converted into single-quantum terms cannot be recovered, and relaxation of zero-quantum coherences and two-spin order will take their toll during the delay pτ4. The interval during which detection is performed has a lower limit τmin = 1/J, imposed by the minimum resolution required. The “partial extraction” method may be carried out in at least three ways. A first method (Fig. 2C) relies on the insertion of a small flip angle β pulse during the precession interval, at the point where the conversion from ZQx to ZQy coherence is complete (32, 34). In Fig. 2D, however, depending on the delay τ0, only a fraction of ZQx is transformed into ZQy, which is then entirely converted into observable terms. The choice of τ0 = arcsin(π/18)/(2πΔνIS) leads to Mextracted/Mtotal = sin(π/18) with the method in Fig. 2D. This is the same fraction as obtained with β = π/18 = 10° in Fig. 2C. Finally (Fig. 2E), it is possible to apply a selective pulse to one of the four proton transitions to transform a fraction of the LLS into detectable terms, as shown in ref. 22. An error of ± 10% in the estimated value of either JIS or ΔνIS leads to a 1.5% loss in sensitivity.
Beyond our earlier work on the excitation of LLS (10, 32, 33, 35), the idea of converting small fractions of LLS into observable magnetization should open new possibilities for the study of slow diffusion and slow exchange by NMR spectroscopy. The present experiments are also designed to cope with heteronuclear J-couplings between the protons involved in the LLS and transporter nuclei such as carbon-13 or nitrogen-15.
No special hardware or software is required to implement these experiments, so that routine NMR equipment suffices. For in vivo studies, the preparation step (1–3) can be performed in the separator/infusion pump described in ref. 29, which can host an NMR coil, whereas the sustain (4) and detection (5) steps have to be performed using the imaging coil.
Each dissolution DNP experiment yielded 2 to 5 mL of hyperpolarized solution. Rather than using the entire amount for one NMR experiment, several experiments requiring only 1 mL each were carried out, whereas the remainder of the hyperpolarized solution was stored in a container located immediately above the high-resolution NMR probe. In each experiment, a different τm interval (Fig. 2) was used. Because the polarization level is not identical from one experiment to the next, inter alea because of the dilution of the freshly injected solution in the sample that was already present in the tube, the final proton signal intensities were normalized dividing them by the intensity of the enhanced 13C signal, measured by direct 13C detection after a 10° pulse. The ratio between proton signals derived from LLS and the 13C signal obtained in this manner was fitted to an exponential decay with three parameters (Fig. 3). The resulting lifetime was in agreement with the TLLS measured for a similar sample without DNP enhancement and without degassing, but with the same radical concentration. Once the proton LLS is generated, it can be sampled at any desired point. The sustaining sequence may be composed of a series of shaped rf pulses (32) interleaved with delays. Some sustaining sequences can keep the dissipated power to a minimum, in view of possible in vivo applications. We have also used the sequence in Fig. 2B to convert small fractions of LLS into detectable magnetization with n = 5 successive time intervals, each with τm = 4 s, and observed the signals during 5 acquisition intervals of ≈50 ms each. These intervals do not lead to any significant signal losses, because they are much shorter than the long periods (up to 25 s) where the LLS is sustained.
Concerning the size-limit for DNP-LLS targets, we know that LLS can be excited and sustained in molecules containing more than two spins (31, 36, 37), such as taurine and amino acids like Gly, Asp, Asn, and Cys, and in mobile parts of proteins. Thus, a significant ratio TLLS(1H)/T1(1H) = 6 has been observed for glycine residues in the C-terminus of Ubiquitin (38). However, no hyperpolarization using dissolution DNP has been reported so far for molecules larger than ≈600 Da (39).
In conclusion, we present a method to alleviate one of the main drawbacks of the dissolution-DNP experiment, i.e., the need to use the enhanced nuclear polarization within a short time interval on the order of 5T1. The new DNP-LLS experiment may find applications for the study of (bio)chemical reactions both in MRI and high-resolution NMR. We demonstrated that dissolution DNP can achieve direct “hyperpolarization” in peptides. Our experiments create long-lived magnetization that should be useful for obtaining maps of the biodistribution of complex tracers and their metabolites (3, 11). The metabolic rates may be followed using detection of controlled amounts of magnetization at desired time intervals.
Methods
The experiments were performed using 0.6 M l-Ala-Gly mixed with 50 mM tetramethylpiperidine-oxyl (TEMPO) and dissolved in 35%/65% vol/vol glycerol-d8/D2O. The frozen beads were placed in a home-built prepolarizer (29), and irradiated at 94 GHz with 30 mW microwave power for 5 h at 1.2 K and 3.35 T. The sample was quickly dissolved in 5 mL of D2O (preheated to 190 °C at 12 bar) to a final concentration of 40 mM. The hyperpolarized solution was transferred to 10-mm tubes maintained at a temperature of 25 °C in an inverse broadband probe in a high-resolution B0 = 7.05 T magnet (Bruker 300 WB). The transfer time was 6 s. The room-temperature experiments using nuclear polarization at Boltzmann equilibrium were carried out at 300 MHz and 298 K using ≈20 mM Ala-Gly solutions in deuterated water. Eight transients were acquired for the reference LLS experiments using a delay of 30 s between consecutive experiments. Experimental relaxation time constants T1 and TLLS were determined by fitting normalized spectral intensities to mono-exponentially decaying functions, and the reported standard deviations are derived from 50 fits of the data, with random noise added to the experimental signal intensities based on the observed noise in the spectra. A WALTZ (40) sequence with an rf amplitude ν1 = 1.5 kHz was used to sustain the LLS.
Acknowledgments.
We thank Martial Rey for technical assistance. P.R.V. thanks C. Luca and C. Palivan for useful discussions. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation “Ambizione” Grant PZOOP2_121928 (to P.R.V.), grants 200020_124694 (to G.B. and P.R.V.) and 20020-124901 (to A.C.), the Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation Grant 9991.1 PFIW-IW (to P. Dyson, G.B., J.P.A., and P.R.V.), the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, and the Faculty of Basic Sciences of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (to P.R.V.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
References
- 1.Abragam A, Goldman M. Principles of dynamic nuclear polarization. Rep Prog Phys. 1978;41:395–467. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Day SE, et al. Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized C-13 magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Nat Med. 2007;13:1382–1387. doi: 10.1038/nm1650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Golman K, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Petersson JS, Mansson S, Leunbach I. Molecular imaging with endogenous substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10435–10439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733836100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Becerra LR, Gerfen GJ, Temkin RJ, Singel DJ, Griffin RG. Dynamic nuclear-polarization with a cyclotron-resonance maser at 5-T. Phys Rev Lett. 1993;71:3561–3564. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prandolini MJ, Denysenkov VP, Gafurov M, Endeward B, Prisner TF. High-field dynamic nuclear polarization in aqueous solutions. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:6090–6092. doi: 10.1021/ja901496g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Overhauser AW. Polarization of nuclei in metals. Phys Rev. 1953;91:476. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carver TR, Slichter CP. Experimental verification of the Overhauser nuclear polarization effect. Phys Rev. 1956;102:975–980. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of >10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10158–10163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Carravetta M, Johannessen OG, Levitt MH. Beyond the T1 limit: Singlet nuclear spin states in low magnetic fields. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;92:153003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.153003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ahuja P, Sarkar R, Vasos PR, Bodenhausen G. Molecular properties determined from the relaxation of long-lived spin states. J Chem Phys. 2007;127:134112. doi: 10.1063/1.2778429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Golman K, in't Zandt R, Thaning M. Real-time metabolic imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:11270–11275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601319103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Merritt ME, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C allows a direct measure of flux through a single enzyme-catalyzed step by NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:19773–19777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706235104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Callaghan PT, Coy A, MacGowan D, Packer KJ, Zelaya FO. Diffraction-like effects in NMR diffusion studies of fluids in porous solids. Nature. 1991;351:467–469. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Golman K, Zandt RI, Lerche M, Pehrson R, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH. Metabolic imaging by hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging for in vivo tumor diagnosis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:10855–10860. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Blamire AM. The technology of MRI—the next 10 years? Br J Radiol. 2008;81:601–617. doi: 10.1259/bjr/96872829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gallagher FA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized C-13-labelled bicarbonate. Nature. 2008;453:940–U973. doi: 10.1038/nature07017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Frydman L, Blazina D. Ultrafast two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of hyperpolarized solutions. Nat Phys. 2007;3:415–419. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mishkovsky M, Frydman L. Progress in hyperpolarized ultrafast 2D NMR spectroscopy. ChemPhysChem. 2008;9:2340–2348. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200800461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pelupessy P. Adiabatic single scan two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:12345–12350. doi: 10.1021/ja034958g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pelupessy P, Rennella E, Bodenhausen G. High-resolution NMR with unknown spatiotemporal variations of magnetic fields. Science. 2009;324:1693–1697. doi: 10.1126/science.1175102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Carravetta M, Levitt MH. Long-lived nuclear spin states in high-field solution NMR. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:6228–6229. doi: 10.1021/ja0490931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sarkar R, Vasos PR, Bodenhausen G. Singlet-state Exchange NMR spectroscopy for the study of very slow dynamic processes. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:328–334. doi: 10.1021/ja0647396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Canet D, Bouguet-Bonnet S, Aroulanda C, Reineri F. About long-lived nuclear spin states involved in para-hydrogenated molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:1445–1449. doi: 10.1021/ja066313x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vinogradov E, Grant AK. Hyperpolarized long-lived states in solution NMR: Three-spin case study in low field. J Magn Reson. 2008;194:46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Warren WS, Jenista E, Branca RT, Chen X. Increasing hyperpolarized spin lifetimes through true singlet eigenstates. Science. 2009;323:1711–1714. doi: 10.1126/science.1167693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Edwards CMB, Cohen MA, Bloom SR. Peptides as drugs. Q J Med. 1999;92:1–4. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/92.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wilson DM, et al. Generation of hyperpolarized substrates by secondary labeling with [1,1–13C] acetic anhydride. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:5503–5507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810190106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pileio G, Carravetta M, Hughes E, Levitt MH. The long-lived nuclear singlet state of N-15-nitrous oxide in solution. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12582–12583. doi: 10.1021/ja803601d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Comment A, et al. Design and performance of a DNP prepolarizer coupled to a rodent MRI scanner. Concepts Magn Reson B. 2007;31B:255–269. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Morris GA, Freeman R. Enhancement of nuclear magnetic-resonance signals by polarization transfer. J Am Chem Soc. 1979;101:760–762. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ahuja P, Sarkar R, Vasos PR, Bodenhausen G. Long lived states in multiple-spin systems. ChemPhysChem. 2009 doi: 10.1002/cphc.200900335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sarkar R, Ahuja P, Moskau D, Vasos PR, Bodenhausen G. Extending the scope singlet-state spectroscopy. ChemPhysChem. 2007;8:2652–2656. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200700545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sarkar R, Ahuja P, Vasos PR, Bodenhausen G. Measurement of slow diffusion coefficients of molecules with arbitrary scalar couplings via long-lived spin states. ChemPhysChem. 2008;9:2414–2419. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200800476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sarkar R, Moskau D, Ferrage F, Vasos PR, Bodenhausen G. Single or triple gradients? J Magn Reson. 2008;193:110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cavadini S, Vasos PR. Singlet states open the way to longer time-scales in the measurement of diffusion by NMR spectroscopy. Concepts Magn Reson. 2008;32A:68–78. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pileio G, Concistré M, Carravetta M, Levitt MH. Long-lived nuclear spin states in the solution NMR of four-spin systems. J Magn Reson. 2006;182:353–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vinogradov E, Grant AK. Long-lived states in solution NMR: Selection rules for intramolecular dipolar relaxation in low magnetic fields. J Magn Reson. 2007;188:176–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ahuja P, Sarkar R, Vasos PR, Bodenhausen G. Diffusion coefficients of biomolecules using long-lived spin states. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:7498–7499. doi: 10.1021/ja902030k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Merritt ME, et al. Hyperpolarized (89)Y offers the potential of direct imaging of metal ions in biological systems by magnetic resonance. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:12942–12943. doi: 10.1021/ja075768z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shaka AJ, Keeler J, Frenkiel T, Freeman R. An improved sequence for broad-band decoupling—WALTZ-16. J Magn Reson. 1983;52:335–338. [Google Scholar]