Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2009 Jun 8;18(2):69–83. doi: 10.1002/mpr.279

Design and field procedures in the US National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement (NCS‐A)

Ronald C Kessler 1,✉, Shelli Avenevoli 2, E Jane Costello 3, Jennifer Greif Green 1, Michael J Gruber 1, Steven Heeringa 4, Kathleen R Merikangas 5, Beth‐Ellen Pennell 4, Nancy A Sampson 1, Alan M Zaslavsky 1
PMCID: PMC2774712  NIHMSID: NIHMS95708  PMID: 19507169

Abstract

An overview is presented of the design and field procedures of the US National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement (NCS‐A), a US face‐to‐face household survey of the prevalence and correlates of DSM‐IV mental disorders. The survey was based on a dual‐frame design that included 904 adolescent residents of the households that participated in the US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (85.9% response rate) and 9244 adolescent students selected from a nationally representative sample of 320 schools (74.7% response rate). After expositing the logic of dual‐frame designs, comparisons are presented of sample and population distributions on Census socio‐demographic variables and, in the school sample, school characteristics. These document only minor differences between the samples and the population. The results of statistical analysis of the bias‐efficiency trade‐off in weight trimming are then presented. These show that modest trimming meaningfully reduces mean squared error. Analysis of comparative sample efficiency shows that the household sample is more efficient than the school sample, leading to the household sample getting a higher weight relative to its size in the consolidated sample relative to the school sample. Taken together, these results show that the NCS‐A is an efficient sample of the target population with good representativeness on a range of socio‐demographic and geographic variables. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: psychiatric epidemiology, child‐adolescent mental disorder, National Comorbidity Survey (NCS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (240.2 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. Deville J.C., Sarndal C.E., Sautory O. (1993) Generalized raking procedures in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar]
  2. DuMouchel W.H., Duncan G.J. (1983) Using sample survey weights in multiple regression analyses of stratified samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 535–543. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gelman A. (2007) Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling. Statistical Science, 22, 153–164, DOI: 10.1214/088342306000000691 [Google Scholar]
  4. Groves R.M. (1989) Survey Errors and Survey Costs, John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  5. Groves R.M., Lepkowski J.M. (1985) Dual frame, mixed mode survey designs. Journal of Official Statistics, 1, 263–286. [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnston L.D., O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G., Schulenberg J.E. (2007) Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2006, NIH Publication No. 07‐6202, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  7. Kessler R.C., Merikangas K.R. (2004) The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R): background and aims. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13: 60–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kessler R.C., Avenevoli S., Costello E.J., Green J.G., Gruber M.J., Heeringa S., Merikangas K.R., Pennell B., Sampson N.A., Zaslavsky A.M. (2009a) The National Comorbidity Survey Adolescent Supplement (NCS‐A): II. Overview and design. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(4), 380–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kessler R.C., Avenevoli S., Greif Green J., Gruber M.J., Heeringa S., Guyer M., He Y., Jin R., Kaufman J., Merikangas K.R., Sampson N.A., Zaslavsky A.M. (2009b) The National Comorbidity Survey Adolescent Supplement (NCS‐A): III. Concordance of DSM‐IV/CIDI diagnoses with clinical reassessments. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(4), 386–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kessler R.C., Berglund P., Chiu W.T., Demler O., Heeringa S., Hiripi E., Jin R., Pennell B.E., Walters E.E., Zaslavsky A., Zheng H. (2004) The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R): Design and field procedures. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13, 69–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kish L. (1965) Survey Sampling, John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kish L. (1987) Statistical Design for Research, John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kish L., Frankel M.R. (1974) Inferences from complex samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lahey B.B., Flagg E.W., Bird H.R., Schwab‐Stone M.E., Canino G., Dulcan M.K., Leaf P.J., Davies M., Brogan D., Bourdon K., Horwitz S.M., Rubio‐Stipec M., Freeman D.H., Lichtman J.H., Shaffer D., Goodman S.H., Narrow W.E., Weissman M.M., Kandel D.B., Jensen P.S., Richters J.E., Regier D.A. (1996) The NIMH Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) study: Background and methodology. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 855–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lepkowski J.M., Groves R.M. (1986) A mean square error model for dual frame, mixed mode survey design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 930–937. [Google Scholar]
  16. Merikangas K.R., Avenevoli S., Costello E.J., Koretz D., Kessler R.C. (2009) The National Comorbidity Survey Adolescent Supplement (NCS‐A): I. Background and measures. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(4), 367–369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tourangeau R., Smith T.W. (1998) Collecting sensitive information with different modes of data collection In: Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection (eds Couper M, Baker R, Bethlehem J, Clark C, Martin J, Nicholls W, O'Reilly J.), pp. 431–454, John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  18. Turner C.F., Ku L., Rogers S.M., Lindberg L.D., Pleck J.H., Sonenstein F.L. (1998) Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867–873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Turner C.F., Lessler J.T., Devore J.W. (1992) Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use In Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies (eds Turner CF, Lessler JT, Gfroerer JC.), DHHS Publication No. ADM 92‐1929, pp. 177–220, National Institute on Drug Abuse. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wolter K.M. (1985) Introduction to Variance Estimation, Springer‐Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zaslavsky A.M., Schenker N., Belin T.R. (2001) Downweighting influential clusters in surveys: Application to the 1990 Post‐Enumeration Survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 858–869. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES