Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 2009 Nov 13;85(5):699–705. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.09.014

Mutations in the Beta Propeller WDR72 Cause Autosomal-Recessive Hypomaturation Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Walid El-Sayed 1,2, David A Parry 1, Roger C Shore 2, Mushtaq Ahmed 3, Hussain Jafri 4, Yasmin Rashid 5, Suhaila Al-Bahlani 6, Sharifa Al Harasi 7, Jennifer Kirkham 2, Chris F Inglehearn 1, Alan J Mighell 1,2,
PMCID: PMC2775821  PMID: 19853237

Abstract

Healthy dental enamel is the hardest and most highly mineralized human tissue. Though acellular, nonvital, and without capacity for turnover or repair, it can nevertheless last a lifetime. Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a collective term for failure of normal enamel development, covering diverse clinical phenotypes that typically show Mendelian inheritance patterns. One subset, known as hypomaturation AI, is characterised by near-normal volumes of organic enamel matrix but with weak, creamy-brown opaque enamel that fails prematurely after tooth eruption. Mutations in genes critical to enamel matrix formation have been documented, but current understanding of other key events in enamel biomineralization is limited. We investigated autosomal-recessive hypomaturation AI in a consanguineous Pakistani family. A whole-genome SNP autozygosity screen identified a locus on chromosome 15q21.3. Sequencing candidate genes revealed a point mutation in the poorly characterized WDR72 gene. Screening of WDR72 in a panel of nine additional hypomaturation AI families revealed the same mutation in a second, apparently unrelated, Pakistani family and two further nonsense mutations in Omani families. Immunohistochemistry confirmed intracellular localization in maturation-stage ameloblasts. WDR72 function is unknown, but as a putative β propeller is expected to be a scaffold for protein-protein interactions. The nearest homolog, WDR7, is involved in vesicle mobilization and Ca2+-dependent exocytosis at synapses. Vesicle trafficking is important in maturation-stage ameloblasts with respect to secretion into immature enamel and removal of cleaved enamel matrix proteins via endocytosis. This raises the intriguing possibility that WDR72 is critical to ameloblast vesicle turnover during enamel maturation.

Main Text

Mature dental enamel is acellular, nonvital, and without capacity for turnover or significant repair. When formed normally, it is the hardest mineralized human tissue and is able to last a lifetime. Amelogenesis, the process by which enamel is produced, is dependent on induction of epithelial-derived ameloblasts through epithelial and mesenchymal interactions1, 2, 3. Ameloblasts pass through a number of functional stages, including presecretion, secretion of the enamel matrix, and a brief transition stage prior to enamel maturation.4, 5, 6 Ameloblasts migrate from the dentino-enamel junction (DEJ) to the eventual tooth surface, where apoptosis occurs before tooth eruption.7 Each ameloblast gives rise to an enamel rod consisting of hydroxyapatite crystals (Ca10[PO4]6[OH]2).8 The physical arrangement of enamel rods is key to the strength of enamel in health.

Upon initiation of the secretion phase, the enamel matrix is laid down, consisting primarily of amelogenin (AMELX; Xp22.1-p22.3 [MIM 300391]) and other functionally important proteins, including enamelin (ENAM; 4q21 [MIM 606585]) and ameloblastin (AMBN; 4q21 [MIM 601259]).9, 10, 11 This matrix also includes thin hydroxyapatite crystals that probably extend across the full thickness of the enamel matrix, from the DEJ to the eventual tooth surface. During maturation, these crystals expand in width and thickness to fill the space previously occupied by the matrix proteins, which are degraded and removed, leaving mature enamel with only traces of protein on eruption.12, 13 Only two enamel-matrix-modifying enzymes have been identified. Matrix metalloproteinase 20 (MMP20; 11q22.3–q23 [MIM 604629])14, 15 has a very restricted pattern of expression and is secreted by ameloblasts into the enamel matrix at the same time as AMELX, ENAM, and AMBN. Kallikrein 4 (KLK4; 19q13.3–q13.4 [MIM 603767])16 is a widely expressed serine protease expressed by transition- and maturation-stage ameloblasts. Both MMP20 and KLK4 are critical to the ordered cleaving of enamel matrix proteins necessary for normal enamel biomineralization. Ameloblasts remove cleaved enamel matrix proteins through receptor-mediated endocytosis.17

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is the name given to a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of inherited enamel biomineralization defects characterized by failure of normal amelogenesis.18, 19 It usually involves all teeth in the primary and secondary dentitions. Subsequent early clinical tooth failure can be associated with significant patient morbidity. AI prevalence data are limited, reports of 1 in 700 and 1 in 14,000 being described in Sweden and the USA, respectively.20, 21 Mendelian patterns of inheritance are often recognized. The nosology of AI is controversial. Improved insight into the genetic causes of AI will aid future classification, which continues to be based primarily on dental phenotypes in isolation.19 Some syndromes, such as Jalili syndrome, exhibit enamel phenotypes indistinguishable from AI occurring alone and represent an opportunity to gain insight into key gene functions in different tissues, as well as to inform improved classification of enamel defects.22, 23, 24

Hypoplastic forms of AI lead to markedly diminished volumes of enamel matrix deposition. These contrast with the near-normal enamel matrix volumes, and hence near-normal tooth crown morphologies, that generally characterize hypocalcified or hypomaturation forms of AI.18, 19, 20 Mutations in AMELX25, 26, 27 (X-linked inheritance) or ENAM10, 25, 28, 29 (either autosomal-dominant or autosomal-recessive inheritance) are the recognized causes of human hypoplastic AI in isolation, but they do not account for all hypoplastic AI. Animal models indicate that other genes are also critical to enamel matrix secretion, and these remain candidate genes for human hypoplastic AI.30

Hypocalcified AI is distinguished by enamel that is so poorly mineralized that it can be scraped away easily and fails very rapidly. FAM83H mutations are the only known cause of autosomal-dominant hypocalcified AI and appear relatively common.31, 32, 33, 34 FAM83H is a cellular protein of unknown function expressed during presecretory and secretory ameloblast stages.35 Its recent discovery has confirmed that processes not taking place in the extracellular enamel matrix are also critical to amelogenesis.

Hypomaturation AI is typified by weak, opaque, and discolored enamel that lacks normal translucency and inappropriately retains enamel matrix proteins. Clinical distinction from hypocalcified AI is difficult after posteruptive changes that occur once tooth crowns are in the mouth and begin to fail. Three mutations have been described in MMP20, and one in KLK4, as causes of autosomal-recessive hypomaturation AI.14, 15, 16, 36 A single AMELX mutation (p.P41T) also causes hypomaturation AI with reduced AMELX-MMP20 interactions.37

Null mouse models for Klk4 and Mmp20 have been reported.38, 39, 40 The enamel in Klk4 null mice was of normal thickness and had decussating enamel rods as expected. However, retained enamel matrix proteins delayed but did not prevent significant levels of enamel maturation. The gross enamel failure when eating even a soft diet was primarily attributed to failure of enamel crystallites to grow together, interlock, and function as a unit. By contrast, Mmp20 null mice have enamel that is thinner and less-mineralized than normal and lacks the expected enamel rod organization.41 It, too, fails prematurely through chipping away and attrition. Although the critical nature of MMP20, KLK4, and AMELX mutations to hypomaturation AI are known, it is also recognized that other causes of hypomaturation AI remain to be discovered.42, 43

We identified and recruited ten families with autosomal-recessive hypomaturation AI and origins from either Kashmir in Pakistan (P1-P5) or Oman (O1-O5). The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the declaration of Helsinki, with informed patient consent, and with ethical approval in the UK, Pakistan, and Oman. When possible, peripheral blood samples were obtained from affected and unaffected family members and genomic DNA was prepared by a conventional salting method. Alternatively, DNA samples were prepared from Oragene (DNA Genotek) saliva collections in accordance with the manufacturers instructions. Dental examinations were undertaken.

The AI in the largest of these families, P1 (Figure 1), was generalized with involvement of the primary and secondary dentitions (Figure 2). The clinical appearances of the teeth on eruption and radiographic appearances prior to eruption were consistent with near-normal enamel matrix volume formation. However, at the time of eruption, the enamel was creamier and more opaque than that of normal teeth. Once in the mouth, the enamel soon began to undergo posteruptive changes, including variable degrees of brown discoloration and loss of enamel tissue. In some instances enamel chipped away, but attrition was also evident. Variable malocclusions were observed, and one affected individual had an anterior open bite. This malocclusion has been reported sporadically in AI of different genetic causes, and the underlying mechanisms remain unknown.44 Teeth were sensitive to thermal and physical stimuli. The clinical features were consistent with hypomaturation AI. No other health problems segregated with AI.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pedigree and Haplotypes of Family P1 Segregating Autosomal-Recessive Hypomature AI

Solid circles (female) and squares (male) distinguish affected individuals, the proband being marked with an arrow. Microsatellite marker genotypes used for defining the candidate interval are recorded, the red bars defining the marker haplotype that tracks with the affected status. Each individual included in the whole-genome screen is marked by an asterisk ().

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Clinical Appearances of Hypomaturation AI in Patients with WDR72 Mutations

(A and B) The dentitions of an 8-year-old (A; family P1) and a 7-year-old (B; family P2), illustrating opaque, creamy-brown, discolored enamel that starts to chip away (arrows) from the underlying dentine soon after eruption and leaves an irregular, stained surface. The upper permanent incisor teeth are more markedly affected than are the lower teeth. An anterior open bite, which does not segregate with the AI, is observed in (A) but not (B).

(C) The dentition of a 19-year-old member of family P1 illustrates posteruption changes, including loss of surface enamel and marked brown staining, with relative sparing of the lower incisor teeth and cervical enamel.

(D) A bitewing radiograph of the individual illustrated in (C), demonstrating gross posteruptive loss of enamel that leaves an irregular surface that is particularly evident on molar teeth (arrow). There is an obvious lack of radiodensity between enamel and dentine in comparison to the inset image of an unerupted tooth from an individual without AI, which has a typical curved crown morphology and enamel (arrow head) that is distinct from the dentine (). Note: the inset image is reproduced at approximately two-thirds the size of the affected teeth.

DNA samples from five affected individuals from family P1 were mixed in equimolar amounts and then subjected to Affymetrix 50K SNP microarray analysis (Figure 1). A large region of homozygozity on chromosome 15 was identified between SNPs rs727614 at 51,032,409 bp and rs2350482 at 87,909,765 bp (Table S1, available online). Twenty polymorphic microsatellite markers within the region were then genotyped in all family members available at that time, these being the sibships to the left of the pedigree and excluding individuals VI:5, VII:9, and VII:11 (Table S2). The resultant genotypes were analyzed with GeneMapper V4.0 software (Applied Biosystems) (Figure 1). Two-point linkage analyses performed with the MLINK program revealed LOD scores of up to 3.3 (Table S3). Multipoint linkage analysis with markers D15S1016, D15S998, and D15S964 against AI gave a maximum LOD score of 4.1 at D15S1016. Subsequently, DNA samples were obtained from the three additional family members—VI:5, VII:9, and VII:11—and these were genotyped with the same set of markers, giving further refinement. The locus spanned approximately 3 cM or 4.4 Mb between D15S1016 and D15S998 and contained 16 annotated genes (Figure 3, Table S4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

WDR72 Mutations and P2, O1, and O2 Family Pedigrees

(A) (i) Schematic representation of the annotated genes at the proximal end of the AI-linked interval on chromosome 15q21.3. (ii) Exonic structure (boxes) of WDR72 with the start (ATG) and stop codons marked and with introns represented by lines. The positions of the mutations are marked with arrows. (iii) Representation of the protein structure with approximate positions of the WD40 domains marked. Positions of the mutations in the wild-type protein are marked with arrows.

(B) Pedigrees for families P2, O1, and O2 with sequences of the mutations found in each. A diamond shape represents an individual of unknown sex.

The coding exons and intron-exon junctions of all 16 genes were amplified by PCR and sequenced by Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit on an ABI 3130XL DNA Analyzer. The only deleterious mutation identified was in WDR72 (Figure 3, Tables S4 and S5). A point mutation identified in exon 15 (c.2348C>G) is predicted to introduce a premature stop codon (p.S783X).

All coding exons of WDR72, as well as surrounding intronic sequences, were then amplified by PCR and sequenced in affected individuals from the remaining hypomaturation AI families (P2–P5 and O1–O5). Family P2, which is not known to be related to P1, shared the same p.S783X mutation and had a similar clinical phenotype (Figure 2). An additional point mutation was identified in exon 17 (c.2934G>A) in family O1 (Figure 3). This results in another premature stop codon, p.W978X. In family O2, a deletion of a single base pair in exon 16 (c.2857Adel.) leads to a terminal frame shift (p.S953VfsX20). The clinical appearances of the affected individuals in families O1 and O2 were consistent with those observed in the other two families. Each mutation cosegregated consistently with the disease phenotype. The mutation in families P1 and P2 was absent from 192 normal Pakistani individuals, and the mutations in families O1 and O2 were not identified in 192 normal individuals of differing ethnic origins. No mutations were identified in the remaining six families. This is consistent with the previous observation that hypomaturation AI is likely to be genetically heterogeneous.42, 43

For investigation of the localization of WDR72 during amelogenesis, polyclonal antisera were raised commercially in rabbits to the synthetic peptide CETGTLERHETGERA (WDR72 amino acids 587–600 with a terminal C added) (GeneScript). Immunohistochemistry was undertaken in accordance with standard methods on sections of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded demineralized mouse jaws that included erupting incisor teeth. Dewaxed and rehydrated sections were incubated with the primary polyclonal antisera for 1 hr. Immunoreactivity was visualized with horseradish peroxidase and DAB (Dako EnVision). WDR72 immunoreactivity was observed in maturation-stage ameloblasts (Figure 4), as well as in some bone and connective-tissue cells. This is consistent with database transcript records that indicate widespread expression in different tissue types.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

WDR72 Localization during Mouse Incisor Development in Secretory and Maturation Phases

WDR72 immunoreactivity is observed in the enamel organ, with more intense staining in maturation ameloblasts (double arrow in panel B) than in secretory ameloblasts (arrow in panel A). Black arrowheads and the open arrowhead mark the enamel matrix and the enamel space after demineralization, respectively. D and B denote dentine and bone, respectively. Inset in (B) shows negative control in which primary antibody has been omitted. Scale bar represents 100 μm.

The WDR72 gene consists of 19 coding exons spanning around 250 kb, encoding a protein of 1102 amino acids about which remarkably little is known (Figure 3). Predictive algorithm analyses identify seven WD40 domains within the first 600 amino acids from the N terminus. WD40 domains are characterized by minimally conserved runs of about 40 amino acids typically bracketed by glycine-histidine and tryptophan-aspartic acid (GH-WD). This domain was first identified in the β subunit of the heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein (G protein), which also has seven WD40 domains.45 However, a large and functionally diverse range of eukaryotic proteins with different numbers of WD40 domains have subsequently been described.46 WD40 domains are believed to form the blades of β propeller structures with four to eight blades, but most typically with seven blades.47 Propeller blade surfaces act as multisite docking platforms critical for transient protein-complex formation.48 Regulatory functions for WD40 domain proteins include histone and/or chromatin modification,49 ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis,50 cell signaling,51 and vesicle turnover,52 among many others.

The functions of WDR72 are unknown. Its closest human homolog and a possible paralog is WDR7, also known as Rabconnectin-3β or TGF-β resistance-associated protein (TRAG).53, 54 It exhibits 37% homology (58% similarity) to WDR72 and also contains seven WD40 domains. WDR7 (Rabconnectin-3β) and DMXL2 (Rabconnectin-3α), another WD40-domain protein, are the two subunits of Rabconnectin.55, 56 Rabconnectin contributes to activation and deactivation of RAB3A, a small GTP-binding protein that is a positive regulator of vesicle mobilization and Ca2+ dependent exocytosis of neurotransmitter release at synaptic vesicles.55, 57

Vesicle turnover is important in maturation-stage ameloblasts. They continue to have secretory functions, including the secretion of KLK4 and Amelotin (AMTN; 4q13.3 [MIM 610912]) into the enamel matrix.40, 58 The ameloblasts undergo regular cyclical morphological changes at the cell-enamel matrix interface. Cleaved enamel matrix proteins are removed by endocytosis that involves multiple cell-membrane invaginations and a “ruffle-ended” ameloblast morphology, although the mechanisms remain poorly understood.3, 17 In part, the morphological changes relate to essential cyclical pH changes.59, 60 The possibility that WDR72 has a similar role in Ca2+-dependent vesicle turnover is therefore intriguing, but there are currently no data supporting this idea that WDR72 and WDR7 function in similar ways.

The unexpected identification of WDR72 mutations as a cause of autosomal-recessive hypomaturation AI creates an opportunity for additional insight into the understanding of amelogenesis and biomineralization. Furthermore, given the localization of WDR72 in different tissue types, this discovery may also stimulate research in other fields.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the families for their participation; Sue Keat for assistance with immunohistochemistry; and Stephen Fayle and Professor Jack Toumba of the Department of Child Dental Health and Steve Ellams of the Department of Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, for information about families P1 and P2. This work was funded by the Egyptian Government (WE) and the Wellcome Trust (grant numbers 082448 and 075945).

Published online: October 22, 2009

Footnotes

Supplemental Data include five tables and can be found with this article at http://www.cell.com/AJHG/.

Web Resources

The URLs for data presented herein are as follows:

Supplemental Data

Document S1. Five Tables
mmc1.pdf (170.5KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Tompkins K. Molecular mechanisms of cytodifferentiation in mammalian tooth development. Connect. Tissue Res. 2006;47:111–118. doi: 10.1080/03008200600727756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thesleff I. Epithelial-mesenchymal signalling regulating tooth morphogenesis. Cell Science at a Glance. 2003;116:1647–1648. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hu J.C., Chun Y.H., Al Hazzazzi T., Simmer J.P. Enamel formation and amelogenesis imperfecta. Cells Tissues Organs. 2007;186:78–85. doi: 10.1159/000102683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nanci A., Smith C.E. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 1992. Development and calcification of enamel. Development and calcification of enamel; in: Mineralization in Biological Systems. pp. 313–343. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smith C.E., Chen W.Y., Issid M., Fazel A. Enamel matrix protein turnover during amelogenesis: basic biochemical properties of short-lived sulfated enamel proteins. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1995;57:133–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00298434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Warshawsky H., Smith C.E. Morphological classification of rat incisor ameloblasts. Anat. Rec. 1974;179:423–446. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091790403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsuchiya M., Sharma R., Tye C.E., Sugiyama T., Bartlett J.D. Transforming growth factor-beta1 expression is up-regulated in maturation-stage enamel organ and may induce ameloblast apoptosis. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2009;117:105–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00612.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cuisinier F.J., Steuer P., Senger B., Voegel J.C., Frank R.M. Human amelogenesis. I: High resolution electron microscopy study of ribbon-like crystals. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1992;51:259–268. doi: 10.1007/BF00334485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bailleul-Forestier I., Molla M., Verloes A., Berdal A. The genetic basis of inherited anomalies of the teeth. Part 1: clinical and molecular aspects of non-syndromic dental disorders. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2008;51:273–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2008.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kang H.Y., Seymen F., Lee S.K., Yildirim M., Tuna E.B., Patir A., Lee K.E., Kim J.W. Candidate gene strategy reveals ENAM mutations. J. Dent. Res. 2009;88:266–269. doi: 10.1177/0022034509333180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wazen R.M., Moffatt P., Zalzal S.F., Yamada Y., Nanci A. A mouse model expressing a truncated form of ameloblastin exhibits dental and junctional epithelium defects. Matrix Biol. 2009;28:292–303. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Smith C.E. Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 1998;9:128–161. doi: 10.1177/10454411980090020101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Porto I.M., Merzel J., de Sousa F.B., Bachmann L., Cury J.A., Line S.R., Gerlach R.F. Enamel mineralization in the absence of maturation stage ameloblasts. Arch. Oral Biol. 2009;54:313–321. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ozdemir D., Hart P.S., Ryu O.H., Choi S.J., Ozdemir-Karatas M., Firatli E., Piesco N., Hart T.C. MMP20 active-site mutation in hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. J. Dent. Res. 2005;84:1031–1035. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim J.W., Simmer J.P., Hart T.C., Hart P.S., Ramaswami M.D., Bartlett J.D., Hu J.C. MMP-20 mutation in autosomal recessive pigmented hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. J. Med. Genet. 2005;42:271–275. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hart P.S., Hart T.C., Michalec M.D., Ryu O.H., Simmons D., Hong S., Wright J.T. Mutation in kallikrein 4 causes autosomal recessive hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. J. Med. Genet. 2004;41:545–549. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.017657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zou Y., Wang H., Shapiro J.L., Okamoto C.T., Brookes S.J., Lyngstadaas S.P., Snead M.L., Paine M.L. Determination of protein regions responsible for interactions of amelogenin with CD63 and LAMP1. Biochem. J. 2007;408:347–354. doi: 10.1042/BJ20070881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Witkop C.J., Jr. Amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia revisited: problems in classification. J. Oral Pathol. 1988;17:547–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1988.tb01332.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aldred M.J., Savarirayan R., Crawford P.J. Amelogenesis imperfecta: a classification and catalogue for the 21st century. Oral Dis. 2003;9:19–23. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.00843.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sundell S., Valentin J. Hereditary aspects and classification of hereditary amelogenesis imperfecta. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 1986;14:211–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1986.tb01537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nusier M., Yassin O., Hart T.C., Samimi A., Wright J.T. Phenotypic diversity and revision of the nomenclature for autosomal recessive amelogenesis imperfecta. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2004;97:220–230. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wright J.T., Hong S.P., Simmons D., Daly B., Uebelhart D., Luder H.U. DLX3 c.561_562delCT mutation causes attenuated phenotype of tricho-dento-osseous syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2008;146:343–349. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parry D.A., Mighell A.J., El-Sayed W., Shore R.C., Jalili I.K., Dollfus H., Bloch-Zupan A., Carlos R., Carr I.M., Downey L.M. Mutations in CNNM4 cause Jalili syndrome, consisting of autosomal-recessive cone-rod dystrophy and amelogenesis imperfecta. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009;84:266–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Asaka T., Akiyama M., Domon T., Nishie W., Natsuga K., Fujita Y., Abe R., Kitagawa Y., Shimizu H. Type XVII collagen is a key player in tooth enamel formation. Am. J. Pathol. 2009;174:91–100. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stephanopoulos G., Garefalaki M.E., Lyroudia K. Genes and related proteins involved in amelogenesis imperfecta. J. Dent. Res. 2005;84:1117–1126. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hobson G.M., Gibson C.W., Aragon M., Yuan Z.A., Davis-Williams A., Banser L., Kirkham J., Brook A.H. A large X-chromosomal deletion is associated with microphthalmia with linear skin defects (MLS) and amelogenesis imperfecta (XAI) Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2009;149A:1698–1705. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bailleul-Forestier I., Berdal A., Vinckier F., de Ravel T., Fryns J.P., Verloes A. The genetic basis of inherited anomalies of the teeth. Part 2: syndromes with significant dental involvement. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2008;51:383–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2008.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim J.W., Seymen F., Lin B.P., Kiziltan B., Gencay K., Simmer J.P., Hu J.C. ENAM mutations in autosomal-dominant amelogenesis imperfecta. J. Dent. Res. 2005;84:278–282. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gutierrez S.J., Chaves M., Torres D.M., Briceno I. Identification of a novel mutation in the enamalin gene in a family with autosomal-dominant amelogenesis imperfecta. Arch. Oral Biol. 2007;52:503–506. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bei M. Molecular genetics of ameloblast cell lineage. J. Exp. Zoolog. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2009;312B:437–444. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.El Sayed W., Shore R.C., Parry D.A., Inglehearn C.F., Mighell A.J. Ultrastructural Analyses of deciduous teeth affected by hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta from a family with a novel Y458X FAM83H nonsense mutation. Cells Tissues Organs. 2009 doi: 10.1159/000252801. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hart P.S., Becerik S., Cogulu D., Emingil G., Ozdemir-Ozenen D., Han S.T., Sulima P.P., Firatli E., Hart T.C. Novel FAM83H mutations in Turkish families with autosomal dominant hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta. Clin. Genet. 2009;75:401–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01112.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim J.W., Lee S.K., Lee Z.H., Park J.C., Lee K.E., Lee M.H., Park J.T., Seo B.M., Hu J.C., Simmer J.P. FAM83H mutations in families with autosomal-dominant hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008;82:489–494. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee S.K., Hu J.C., Bartlett J.D., Lee K.E., Lin B.P., Simmer J.P., Kim J.W. Mutational spectrum of FAM83H: the C-terminal portion is required for tooth enamel calcification. Hum. Mutat. 2008;29:E95–E99. doi: 10.1002/humu.20789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lee M.J., Lee S.K., Lee K.E., Kang H.Y., Jung H.S., Kim J.W. Expression patterns of the Fam83h gene during murine tooth development. Arch. Oral Biol. 2009;54:846–850. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Papagerakis P., Lin H.K., Lee K.Y., Hu Y., Simmer J.P., Bartlett J.D., Hu J.C. Premature stop codon in MMP20 causing amelogenesis imperfecta. J. Dent. Res. 2008;87:56–59. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tanimoto K., Le T., Zhu L., Witkowska H.E., Robinson S., Hall S., Hwang P., Denbesten P., Li W. Reduced amelogenin-MMP20 interactions in amelogenesis imperfecta. J. Dent. Res. 2008;87:451–455. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bartlett J.D., Beniash E., Lee D.H., Smith C.E. Decreased mineral content in MMP-20 null mouse enamel is prominent during the maturation stage. J. Dent. Res. 2004;83:909–913. doi: 10.1177/154405910408301204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Caterina J.J., Skobe Z., Shi J., Ding Y., Simmer J.P., Birkedal-Hansen H., Bartlett J.D. Enamelysin (matrix metalloproteinase 20)-deficient mice display an amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:49598–49604. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209100200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Simmer J.P., Hu Y., Lertlam R., Yamakoshi Y., Hu J.C. Hypomaturation Enamel Defects in Klk4 Knockout/LacZ Knockin Mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:19110–19121. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.013623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wright J.T., Hart T.C., Hart P.S., Simmons D., Suggs C., Daley B., Simmer J., Hu J., Bartlett J.D., Li Y. Human and mouse enamel phenotypes resulting from mutation or altered expression of AMEL, ENAM, MMP20 and KLK4. Cells Tissues Organs. 2009;189:224–229. doi: 10.1159/000151378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Becerik S., Cogulu D., Emingil G., Han T., Hart P.S., Hart T.C. Exclusion of candidate genes in seven Turkish families with autosomal recessive amelogenesis imperfecta. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2009;149A:1392–1398. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim J.W., Simmer J.P., Lin B.P., Seymen F., Bartlett J.D., Hu J.C. Mutational analysis of candidate genes in 24 amelogenesis imperfecta families. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2006;114 Suppl 1:3–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00278.x. discussion 39–41, 379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ravassipour D.B., Powell C.M., Phillips C.L., Hart P.S., Hart T.C., Boyd C., Wright J.T. Variation in dental and skeletal open bite malocclusion in humans with amelogenesis imperfecta. Arch. Oral Biol. 2005;50:611–623. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fong H.K., Hurley J.B., Hopkins R.S., Miake-Lye R., Johnson M.S., Doolittle R.F., Simon M.I. Repetitive segmental structure of the transducin beta subunit: homology with the CDC4 gene and identification of related mRNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1986;83:2162–2166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.7.2162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Smith T.F. Diversity of WD-repeat proteins. Subcell. Biochem. 2008;48:20–30. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09595-0_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jawad Z., Paoli M. Novel sequences propel familiar folds. Structure. 2002;10:447–454. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00750-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Valeyev N.V., Downing A.K., Sondek J., Deane C. Electrostatic and Functional Analysis of the Seven-Bladed WD beta-Propellers. Evol Bioinform Online. 2008;4:203–216. doi: 10.4137/ebo.s743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Song J.J., Garlick J.D., Kingston R.E. Structural basis of histone H4 recognition by p55. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1313–1318. doi: 10.1101/gad.1653308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cohn M.A., Kee Y., Haas W., Gygi S.P., D'Andrea A.D. UAF1 is a subunit of multiple deubiquitinating enzyme complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:5343–5351. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808430200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kim S.E., Yoon J.Y., Jeong W.J., Jeon S.H., Park Y., Yoon J.B., Park Y.N., Kim H., Choi K.Y. H-Ras is degraded by Wnt/beta-catenin signaling via beta-TrCP-mediated polyubiquitylation. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:842–848. doi: 10.1242/jcs.040493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ashery U., Bielopolski N., Barak B., Yizhar O. Friends and foes in synaptic transmission: the role of tomosyn in vesicle priming. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32:275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sanders S., Keck-Waggoner C.L., Zimonjic D.B., Popescu N.C., Thorgeirsson S.S. Assignment of WDR7 (alias TRAG, TGF-beta resistance associated gene) to orthologous regions of human chromosome 18q21.1→q22 and mouse chromosome 18D.1-E.3 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2000;88:324–325. doi: 10.1159/000015520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kawabe H., Sakisaka T., Yasumi M., Shingai T., Izumi G., Nagano F., Deguchi-Tawarada M., Takeuchi M., Nakanishi H., Takai Y. A novel rabconnectin-3-binding protein that directly binds a GDP/GTP exchange protein for Rab3A small G protein implicated in Ca(2+)-dependent exocytosis of neurotransmitter. Genes Cells. 2003;8:537–546. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00655.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sakisaka T., Takai Y. Purification and properties of rabconnectin-3. Methods Enzymol. 2005;403:401–407. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)03035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nagano F., Kawabe H., Nakanishi H., Shinohara M., Deguchi-Tawarada M., Takeuchi M., Sasaki T., Takai Y. Rabconnectin-3, a novel protein that binds both GDP/GTP exchange protein and GTPase-activating protein for Rab3 small G protein family. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:9629–9632. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100730200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Coleman W.L., Bykhovskaia M. Rab3a-mediated vesicle recruitment regulates short-term plasticity at the mouse diaphragm synapse. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2009;41:286–296. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Moffatt P., Smith C.E., St-Arnaud R., Simmons D., Wright J.T., Nanci A. Cloning of rat amelotin and localization of the protein to the basal lamina of maturation stage ameloblasts and junctional epithelium. Biochem. J. 2006;399:37–46. doi: 10.1042/BJ20060662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sui W., Boyd C., Wright J.T. Altered pH regulation during enamel development in the cystic fibrosis mouse incisor. J. Dent. Res. 2003;82:388–392. doi: 10.1177/154405910308200512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lyaruu D.M., Bronckers A.L., Mulder L., Mardones P., Medina J.F., Kellokumpu S., Oude Elferink R.P., Everts V. The anion exchanger Ae2 is required for enamel maturation in mouse teeth. Matrix Biol. 2008;27:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2007.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Five Tables
mmc1.pdf (170.5KB, pdf)

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES