Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2009 Nov 15;97(10):2700–2709. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.058

Phase Separation in Binary Mixtures of Bipolar and Monopolar Lipid Dispersions Revealed by 2H NMR Spectroscopy, Small Angle X-Ray Scattering, and Molecular Theory

David P Brownholland , Gabriel S Longo , Andrey V Struts , Matthew J Justice , Igal Szleifer ††, Horia I Petrache , Michael F Brown ‡,§, David H Thompson †,
PMCID: PMC2776299  PMID: 19917223

Abstract

Binary mixtures of C20BAS and POPC membranes were studied by solid-state 2H NMR spectroscopy and small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) over a wide range of concentrations and at different temperatures. Three specifically deuterated C20BAS derivatives—[1′,1′,20′,20′-2H4]C20BAS, [2′,2′,19′,19′-2H4]C20BAS, and [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS—combined with protiated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC), as well as membranes containing POPC-d31 and fully protiated bolalipid, were used in NMR experiments to obtain structural information for the mixtures. The 2H NMR spectra of [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS/POPC membrane dispersions reveal that the bolalipid is predominantly in the transmembrane conformation at high bolalipid concentrations (100, 90, and 70 mol %). At ≤50 mol % C20BAS, smaller quadrupolar couplings appear in the spectra, indicating the presence of U-shaped conformers. The proportion of U-shaped bolalipids increases as the amount of POPC in the membrane increases; however, the transmembrane component remains the dominant bolalipid conformation in the membrane even at 45°C and 10 mol % C20BAS, where it accounts for ∼50% of the bolalipid population. The large fraction of C20BAS transmembrane conformers, regardless of the C20BAS/POPC ratio, together with the findings from molecular mean-field theory calculations, suggests the coexistence of phase-separated bolalipid-rich domains and POPC-rich domains. A single lamellar repeat distance was observed in SAXS experiments corresponding to the average repeat spacing expected for C20BAS- and POPC-rich domains. These observations are consistent with the presence of microphase-separated domains in the mixed membrane samples that arise from POPC-C20BAS hydrophobic mismatch.

Introduction

A growing body of evidence suggests that cell membranes are complex, heterogeneous liquid-crystalline materials with phase-separated lipid domains. Because of the difficulties involved in studying these phenomena in their native membrane context, most investigators have relied on various model membrane systems to help elucidate the physical properties, dynamics, composition, and significance of these structures (1–8). Two types of lipid domains have been detected using model membranes. The first is produced by a simple binary mixture of lipids with significantly different melting transition temperatures (Tm). At temperatures between the two melting transitions, the lipid with the lower Tm adopts a liquid-crystalline (Lα) or liquid-disordered (ld) phase that tends to separate from the lipid with the higher Tm, which adopts a more ordered and relatively immobile gel phase (Lβ). Lβ/Id phase immiscibility is not believed to be relevant to the functional state of biological membranes. Model membranes composed of ternary mixtures of two lipids with different melting transitions enriched with cholesterol (typically unsaturated lipids mixed with either saturated lipids or sphingomyelin) can also produce two phase-separated domains: an ld phase and a liquid-ordered (lo) phase, the latter of which is considered analogous to so-called lipid rafts in cell membranes. The lo phase is a hybrid of the Lβ and Lα phases, i.e., it contains lipids with a high-degree of order, as formed in the Lβ phase, while maintaining the lateral fluidity characteristic of the Lα phase (3,8). A variety of techniques have been used to detect lipid domains in model membranes (8–14); however, many fundamental questions about lipid domains in cell membranes remain concerning their mechanism of formation, their size and lifetime, and the factors that may influence their ability to include or exclude membrane proteins (3,5,15).

Phase separation in membranes is also relevant for lipid membrane-based technologies. To realize the promise of these technologies, researchers are developing new lipids and polymers to create rugged membrane constructs that maintain membrane protein function. Understanding how these new materials interact with lipid membranes is critical for developing stable and functional membrane-based devices. Bipolar lipids, or bolalipids, constitute a novel class of phospholipids that are currently under investigation for these purposes (16–21). Bolalipids are naturally found in the membranes of Archaea (22,23) and enable these organisms to survive under harsh conditions, such as extreme temperatures, high salt concentration, low pH, and anaerobic conditions due to the unique isoprenoid chains that are ether-linked to the glyceryl- and glycal-based polar headgroups (22,24) present on the inner and outer surfaces, respectively, of their plasma membrane. These hydrolysis-resistant membrane-spanning alkyl chains are believed to be responsible for the enhanced physical and chemical stability of Archaea, and also provide resistance to bilayer membrane delamination within the extreme environment in which they thrive. The enhanced stability of bolalipid membranes has been employed in the development of planar supported membranes (17,25,26), gene and vaccine delivery vehicles (27–30), functional reconstitution of integral membrane proteins (IMPs) (18,19,31,32), and as molecular fossils (33). Major impediments to the more widespread use of bolalipids in membrane-based biosensors are the cost and difficulties involved in either purifying or totally synthesizing discrete Archaeal lipid species. These challenges have prompted researchers to focus on the development of archaeal lipid mimics, which contain many of the desired properties of natural bolalipids (23,25,30,34–38).

Kim et al. (18) and Febo-Ayala et al. (19) synthesized a small library of synthetic bolalipids designed to generate stable planar supported membranes with reconstituted IMPs for biosensors. Previous work established that bolalipid membranes are physically robust, chemically stable, less permeable than membranes composed of monopolar lipids, and retain lateral mobilities that are similar to the conventional monopolar lipids—an essential feature of membrane dynamics that is likely to be necessary for the functional reconstitution of IMPs (18,20,26,39). The average segmental order parameters at the C(1:20), C(2:19), and C(10:11) positions of deuterated C20BAS (Fig. 1 A) were also obtained in previous experiments (21). Those experiments showed that C20BAS bolalipid membranes, unlike typical bilayer membranes, are highly ordered, especially at the C10,11 positions, in the center of the membrane (21). It should also be noted that most synthetic and naturally occurring bolalipids have sufficient flexibility to exist in two conformational states in the membrane: a transmembrane conformation with two polar headgroups on opposite leaflets of the membrane, and a U-shaped conformation with both headgroups residing on the same leaflet. However, several experimental and theoretical studies have suggested that bolalipids predominantly adopt a transmembrane conformation in the membrane (16,21,40–42).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Structures of POPC, C20BAS, and deuterated C20BAS derivatives 1–3. (B) Schematic representation of the predicted phase separation for a mixed C20BAS/POPC lipid membrane. The bolalipid-rich domain consists of transmembrane bolalipids (AT) and a small molar ratio of POPC (M). The monopolar lipid-rich domain consists of POPC with a small molar ratio of U-shaped bolalipids (AU). (C) Predicted miscibility diagram showing the regime of lipid mixtures where phase separation between fluid phase C20BAS and monopolar lipids (adapted from (42)) is expected (gray shaded area). XA is the molar fraction of C20BAS, and nL is the number of carbons in the hydrophobic chain of the monopolar lipid. (D) Diagram of various membrane lipid configurations in different regions of the miscibility diagram. I = POPC-rich phase with U-shaped C20BAS conformations; II = mixture of C20BAS and POPC that generates significant hydrophobic mismatch leading to a separation into type I and III domains; III = C20BAS-rich phase with modest POPC content (predominantly transmembrane C20BAS with some U-conformers, especially at higher temperatures).

Functional reconstitution experiments with the IMP Ste14p in membranes mixed with bolalipids and monopolar lipids indicated that bolalipids may form heterogeneous membranes with monopolar lipids in a composition-dependent manner (19). Longo and co-workers (42) recently used molecular mean-field theory to evaluate mixtures of C20-based bolalipids and monopolar lipids of varying lengths. They showed that phase separation between bolalipids and monopolar lipids occurs when the membrane thicknesses of two lipids differ significantly (42). We inferred from those findings that two distinct lipid domains (Fig. 1 B) should form after C20BAS bolalipid is mixed with 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC; Fig. 1 A) at intermediate bipolar/monopolar lipid ratios (Fig. 1 C). A 3-nm-thick domain containing predominantly transmembrane C20BAS and a small percentage of POPC should coexist with a second type of domain (4-nm thick) containing predominantly POPC and a low molar ratio of C20BAS in a U-shaped conformer (Fig. 1, B and D). Order parameters for the C-2H bonds in the transmembrane region of C20BAS were also predicted for both the transmembrane and U-shaped conformers (42), suggesting that it might be possible to detect microphase separation in these mixtures by 2H NMR spectroscopy.

The potential occurrence of phase separation between bolalipids and monopolar lipids has important consequences for the appropriate design and use of bolalipids in membrane-based technologies, since lipid mixtures offer greater design flexibility in optimizing the fluidity, stability, and lateral homogeneity needed to realize functional membrane-based devices. Therefore, in this work we sought to determine whether domain formation occurs in membranes composed of C20BAS and POPC. Binary mixtures of C20BAS and POPC membranes were evaluated by solid-state 2H NMR spectroscopy. We report the effects of molar ratio and temperature on C20BAS/POPC mixed membranes using 2H NMR spectroscopy, by incorporating either the deuterated bolalipid [10′, 11′-2H2]C20BAS in protiated POPC (21), or perdeuterated POPC-d31 in protiated C20BAS membranes. We compared these results with data acquired by small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) of C20BAS/POPC membranes and computational findings from the application of molecular mean-field theory. Our evidence shows that membranes containing C20BAS and POPC can exhibit microphase-separated C20BAS-rich and POPC-rich domains depending on the molar ratio of the two lipids.

Materials and Methods

Lipid synthesis

The synthesis of C20BAS (37), [1′,1′,20′,20′-2H4]-C20BAS, [2′,2′,19′,19′-2H4]C20BAS, and [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS (21) was previously reported.

Sample preparation for 2H NMR spectroscopy

Lyophilized C20BAS and POPC were dissolved in 1:1 CH3OH/CHCl3 to fully mix the compounds, and the solution was then added directly to a 5-mm NMR tube. The mixture was dried under a stream of N2 and further dried in vacuo overnight. The lipids were dispersed in 2H-depleted water (1H2O) with 1 min of vortexing, and lyophilized. Then 1H2O was added to make a 50% w/w mixture. This sample was subjected to 10 freeze (liquid nitrogen), thaw (50°C), and vortex (30 s) (FTV) cycles before the 2H NMR spectra were recorded. NMR tubes were closed with Teflon plugs.

2H NMR spectroscopy

Solid-state 2H NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker AMX300 spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a wide-bore magnet (7T) equipped with a custom-built, high-power probe (experimental details for the spectral acquisition parameters can be found in the Supporting Material).

Data analysis for 2H NMR spectroscopy

The 2H NMR powder-type spectra were numerically deconvoluted, or de-Paked, to generate spectra for the θ = 0° orientation as described elsewhere (43). Details of the data analysis methods used are provided in the Supporting Material.

Samples for SAXS

Lipid mixtures (5–10 mg) were added to conical 1.5 mL polypropylene vials, sealed with o-ring screw caps, and dissolved in 1:1 CH3OH/CHCl3. The solvent was evaporated with a stream of N2 and traces of solvent were removed in vacuo overnight. The dried lipid films were hydrated with 50% H2O by weight and subjected to 10 FTV cycles. The samples were then fully hydrated by adding excess water (≥500 μL). All lipid mixtures aggregated and sank to the bottom of the conical vial. Samples were stored at −20°C and allowed to equilibrate at the measurement temperature for at least 1 h before data acquisition.

SAXS measurements

SAXS measurements were performed using a fixed-anode Bruker Nanostar U system (Bruker AXS, Madison, WI) (see Supporting Material for experimental details).

Molecular theory

A molecular theory to study binary mixtures of monopolar lipids and bolalipids in the Lα phase was previously established (42). The key features of this approach are described in the Supporting Material.

Results

2H NMR spectroscopy of [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS/POPC mixed membranes

Three deuterated C20BAS derivatives—[1′,1′,20′,20′-2H4]C20BAS; [2′,2′,19′,19′-2H4]C20BAS; and [10′,11′-2H2] C20BAS (Fig. 1 A)—were synthesized as previously described (21). Multilamellar vesicle dispersions for 2H NMR analysis were prepared by multiple FTV cycles before the NMR tube was loaded and spectra were acquired. Compound 1 produced two distinguishable components in the 2H NMR spectrum, indicating that the two deuterium atoms at the C1′ and C20′ carbon positions were nonequivalent, consistent with previous findings for other ether-linked phospholipids (44,45). Compounds 2 and 3 gave rise to single components in the 2H NMR spectra, with the corresponding order parameters of |SCD| = 0.21 and 0.23, respectively, at 25°C (Fig. S1 in the Supporting Material).

These results demonstrate that bolalipid molecules maintain a high degree of order throughout pure bolalipid membranes. Conversely, bilayer membranes composed of monopolar lipids are significantly disordered in the center of the membrane due to the conformational freedom of the monopolar lipid acyl chains (Fig. S1) (46). These data also indicate that the bolalipids exist almost exclusively as transmembrane conformers in the membrane (i.e., configuration AT in Fig. 1 B), where the headgroups of a single bolalipid reside on opposite leaflets of the membrane. This is inferred because the C-2H bonds in the center of the transmembrane chain display higher-order parameters than the comparable position in a monopolar lipid chain, and possess an average bond orientation close to 90° relative to the membrane normal. Both of these findings are consistent with a transmembrane conformation of the sn-1 bolalipid chain. U-shaped conformers would give rise to significantly lower segmental order parameters in the middle of the membrane, since the orientations are less restricted than those accessible by the transmembrane conformer, providing an increased amplitude/angular range of the segmental fluctuations.

Fig. 2 shows 2H NMR powder-type and de-Paked spectra for randomly oriented membranes comprised of [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS and POPC binary membranes at varying molar ratios (see Table S1 in the Supporting Material for quadrupolar splittings). These data indicate that all membrane mixtures are in the Lα state at 25°C, which is expected based on the melting temperatures of C20BAS (17°C) and POPC (−2°C) (20,47). Membranes with XA equal to 1, 0.9, and 0.7 (where XA = molar ratio of [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS in the mixed membrane dispersion) give rise to 2H NMR spectra with a single, large quadrupolar splitting, suggesting predominantly transmembrane bolalipids. At XA = 0.5, additional components in the spectrum with small additional quadrupolar splittings become apparent. We attribute these smaller ΔνQ spectral components to U-shaped C20BAS conformers (i.e., AU in Fig. 1 B) within the membrane. As the mole fraction of C20BAS in the membranes decreases to 0.3 and 0.1, the contribution of the U-shaped components to the overall lineshape increases. These splittings, detectable in both the powder-type and de-Paked spectra, were more prominent at higher temperatures and were observed to be reversible. It is important to note that the component with a large quadrupolar splitting, which we attribute to the transmembrane conformer, was the predominant species at all molar ratios.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Powder-type (black line) and de-Paked (gray line) 2H NMR spectra obtained from [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS/POPC (XA/XM) mixed membranes at various concentrations. Spectra were acquired at 25°C (left) and 45°C (right). Data for 1:0 [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS/POPC at 25°C (21) are used with permission from the American Chemical Society.

The composition-dependent C20BAS order (Fig. S2) also varied as a function of temperature. As the molar ratio of C20BAS in the membrane increases, the quadrupolar splitting for the transmembrane component decreases. This trend is observed over a 50°C range of temperatures and at different membrane compositions (Fig. S3). As expected, the quadrupolar splittings are inversely proportional to temperature for all examined molar ratios. It should also be noted that the difference in quadrupolar splitting for different compositions decreases at sample temperatures below 10°C (i.e., as the temperature approaches the LαLβ phase transition of the membrane).

2H NMR spectroscopy of C20BAS/POPC-d31 mixed membranes

Membranes composed of mixtures of perdeuterated POPC-d31 and fully protiated bolalipid mixtures also were evaluated at varying molar ratios (Fig. 3 A and Fig. S4, Table S2). At 25°C, the 2H NMR spectra for all mixtures reveal an Lα membrane (Fig. 3 A) in which the average segmental order for methylene segments, (i), has the expected plateau region close to the glycerol backbone, followed by a sharp decrease in order approaching the terminal methyl group (Fig. S4). Of interest, there is no proportional relationship to the average segmental order as a function of the molar ratio of the lipids. Rather, there is an observed minimum in average segmental order for all (i) at XA = 0.3 (Fig. 3 B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Powder-type (black line) and de-Paked (gray line) 2H NMR spectra recorded for C20BAS/POPC-d31 (XA/XM) membranes at XA = 0.9, 0.7, 0.5, 0.3, 0.1, and 0 at 25°C. (B) Order parameter of [C6′] (□), [C9′] (×), and [C12′] (Δ) methylene units in POPC-d31, as a function of C20BAS mole fraction in POPC at 25°C.

At 1:1 POPC-d31/C20BAS, a coexistence of multiple POPC-d31 phases is detected (Fig. 4). At 10°C and above, a well-resolved Lα spectrum is observed, whereas at −60°C, a typical gel-phase spectrum is seen. Between 3°C and 7°C, however, there appear to be spectral components corresponding to POPC in the Lβ and Lα phases. We attribute these observations to the formation of phase-separated domains wherein POPC-d31 molecules in the POPC-rich phase adopt Lα ordering, whereas POPC-d31 molecules that are distributed in the bolalipid-rich phase adopt a gel phase-like ordering that is enforced by the surrounding highly-ordered bolalipids (i.e., Type III domain in Fig. 1 D). Under conditions of slow NMR exchange, a lower limit to the lifetime, τ, of lipids within a domain can be estimated from τ > 1/Δ(ΔνQ), where Δ(ΔνQ) is the difference in quadrupolar splitting for the two coexisting phases. A rough lower limit to the size of a domain is then obtained using <r2> = 4DLτ, where we introduce the mean-square distance, r, traveled in time τ for a lipid with lateral diffusion coefficient DL. With lateral diffusion coefficients of 2 × 10−11 m2 s−1 for both C20BAS and POPC (20,48), and Δ(ΔνQ) ≈ 40 kHz, we obtain a value of <r2>1/2 > 50 nm for the lower limit to the domain size.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Powder (top) and de-Paked (bottom) spectra of C20BAS/POPC-d31 (1:1) at 25°C, 10°C, 4°C, and −60°C.

Molecular theory

Molecular mean-field theory (42) was used to calculate the orientational order parameters of planar mixtures of C20BAS and POPC for comparison with the 2H NMR spectral findings. In particular, we focused on the saturated sn-1-palmitoyl chain of POPC to shed more light on the lipid order parameters. The model explicitly includes conformational degrees of freedom, molecular details of the different lipid species, inhomogeneous interactions that molecules encounter within the lipid bilayer that arise from nearest-neighbor hydrophobic packing repulsions, and the alignment interactions that drive LαLβ phase transitions in the system. A brief description of the theoretical model used in this study is presented in the Supporting Material.

The lipid segment-segment alignment interaction strength is unknown. This parameter is adjusted in such a way that the calculated gel transition temperature of C20BAS matches the experimental one of 17°C. The optimal area per lipid is not known a priori, but is determined as the area per lipid that minimizes the overall free energy. Fig. 5 A shows the free energy per molecule as a function of the area per lipid headgroup, ah, for a pure C20BAS membrane. Two local free-energy minima of equivalent magnitudes are observed, corresponding to the Lβ (lower ah) and Lα (higher ah) phases of the pure bolalipid membrane. The fact that these two local minima are both global minima of the free energy indicates that the Lβ and Lα phases coexist at this temperature.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Free energy per molecule, fN, as a function of the area per lipid headgroup, ah, for (A) pure C20 BAS membranes at 17°C, the melting transition of C20BAS; (B) C20BAS-rich membranes (XA = 0.9) in the gel phase at 4°C; and (C) POPC-rich membranes (XA = 0.1) in the Lα phase at 4°C. (D) Orientational order parameters for POPC as a function of alkyl chain segment number at XA = 0.9 in the gel phase (□) and XA = 0.1 (•) in the Lα phase.

Once this interaction parameter is set, the free energy per molecule, fN, for mixtures of C20BAS and POPC can be calculated. Fig. 5, B and C, shows fN as a function of ah for two mixtures with different concentrations of bolalipid: a C20BAS-rich membrane (XA = 0.9; Fig. 5 B) and a POPC-rich membrane (XA = 0.1; Fig. 5 C). The temperature is set to 4°C to obtain more information about the mixed POPC-d31 spectra (Fig. 4) in which both Lα- and Lβ-phase POPC components were observed. The C20BAS-rich layer (XA = 0.9) is clearly in the gel phase at 4°C, whereas only the higher ah minimum is present in the POPC-rich mixture (XA = 0.1), indicating that the system is in the Lα phase at this temperature. Fig. 5 D shows the orientational order parameters expected for POPC in the C20BAS-rich (i.e., gel-phase; Fig. 5 B) and POPC-rich (i.e., Lα phase; Fig. 5 C) domains. Clearly, very different 2H NMR spectra would be expected for POPC in these different physical environments, with the C1-C8 segments of the monopolar lipid acyl chain showing the greatest difference in order parameters for the Lβ-like and Lα-like phase-separated domains.

SAXS patterns

SAXS patterns were acquired for membranes composed of C20BAS/POPC mixtures at 30°C (Fig. 6 A). The two-dimensional x-ray patterns show uniform scattering rings, which index as the first two orders of a lamellar repeat. The scattering patterns indicate complete sample equilibration and the absence of macrophase separation for the C20BAS/POPC mixtures. Radially integrated scattering profiles are shown in Fig. 6 A as a function of the scattering angle 2θ. At 30°C, the interlamellar repeat spacings reach a minimum value of 54.5 Å for XA = 0.9 and a maximum value of 64.0 Å for XA = 0 (Fig. 6 B). The latter value, which is for pure POPC multilayers, agrees well with previous literature (49). The temperature dependence of the D-spacing for pure C20BAS membranes (XA = 1) and the 1:1 mixture (XA = 0.5) is shown in the Supporting Material. As the temperature increases, the D-spacing of C20BAS membranes increases, whereas the D-spacing of the 1:1 mixture decreases (Fig. S5 C).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) SAXS patterns of C20BAS/POPC vesicles for XA = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9, at 30°C. Y axis = intensity in arbitrary units. (B) D spacings of C20BAS/POPC membranes for XA = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1.0 at 30°C.

Discussion

Febo-Ayala et al. (19) previously investigated the activity of reconstituted Ste14p, an IMP enzyme with a predicted hydrophobic spanning domain of 40 Å, in C20BAS/POPC vesicles. They found that the activity of Ste14p was not disturbed in C20BAS/POPC mixed membranes containing low molar ratios of C20BAS; however, above 50 mol % C20BAS, the enzyme activity diminished dramatically. Dual-staining experiments showed that the protein was uniformly distributed in the membrane at all lipid compositions, suggesting that no macroscopic phase separation was occurring in the system. It was proposed by Febo-Ayala et al. (19) that the loss of Ste14p activity in membrane dispersions containing high molar ratios of C20BAS was due to a mismatch between the hydrophobic thicknesses of the protein and the C20BAS membrane regimes. The nonlinearity of this relationship suggested that the bolalipid formed microphase-separated domains within POPC, such that the Ste14p activity was retained at high POPC content in the membrane by partitioning the enzyme into the thicker POPC-rich domains. In contrast, C32phytBAS, a bolalipid that forms thicker membranes that match the hydrophobic domain of Ste14p, was capable of maintaining the activity of Ste14p at all C32phytBAS/POPC molar ratios. Molecular theory suggests that C20BAS and POPC membranes, which have significantly different membrane thicknesses (32 Å (50) and 43 Å (51), respectively), undergo phase separation due to hydrophobic mismatch (42). This theory suggests that two types of domains are formed: 1), one rich in transmembrane bolalipids with a small population of POPC; and 2), one rich in POPC with a small population of U-shaped conformers (Fig. 1, B–D). 2H NMR spectroscopy was used to probe for the existence of phase separation through the measurement of order parameters of bolalipids labeled with deuterium in the center of the transmembrane chain, since the order parameters of these segments should be significantly smaller if the bolalipid adopts a U-shaped conformer in the membrane instead of a transmembrane conformation.

The 2H NMR spectra of [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS/POPC membrane dispersions (Fig. 2) suggest that the bolalipid is predominantly in the transmembrane conformation for bolalipid-rich fractions (i.e., XA = 1, 0.9, and 0.7). At 50 mol % C20BAS, components in the spectra with smaller quadrupolar coupling constants begin to appear, indicating the presence of U-shaped conformers. The proportion of U-shaped bolalipids becomes more prominent as the amount of POPC in the membrane increases; however, the transmembrane component was still the predominant bolalipid conformation in the membrane even at 45°C and XA = 0.1, where it accounted for ∼50% of the bolalipid population. C20BAS is expected to be thermodynamically unstable as a transmembrane conformer in POPC-rich membranes due to significant hydrophobic mismatch; therefore, it must adopt a U-shaped conformation to become dispersed into POPC bilayers (42). Since the majority of C20BAS bolalipids are observed to be transmembrane conformers regardless of the C20BAS/POPC ratio, these conformations must exist in bolalipid-rich domains that are separated from the POPC-rich domains. However, the presence of U-shaped conformers when XA = 0.5 gives rise to multiple components in the 2H NMR spectra with lower order parameters. This may occur because U-shaped conformers can exist in the C20BAS-rich phase, the POPC-rich phase, and the interface between the two, potentially leading to different order parameters. Lower order parameters are expected due to the increased amplitude of segmental fluctuations near the bilayer center (46). Further, the synthesis of [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS produces a mixture of 16 stereoisomers (Fig. S6) that may contribute additional complexity to the 2H NMR spectra. It is notable that the contributions of U-shaped conformers were greatest at the highest temperatures studied (45°C) and that their appearance/disappearance in the sample was reversible. An additional, and somewhat surprising, observation is that the quadrupolar splitting of the transmembrane component increases with increasing mol % POPC. We attribute this finding to the effect of hydrophobic mismatch, i.e., the thicker POPC forces the bolalipid to elongate, thereby increasing the order of its alkyl chains and reducing the hydrophobic mismatch between itself and the longer POPC. This suggests that even in phase-separated domains, the POPC-rich phase promotes the extension of C20BAS molecules in the bolalipid-rich phase to reduce hydrophobic mismatch.

Analysis of the C20BAS/POPC-d31 2H NMR spectra in Fig. 3 A revealed a nonlinear relationship between the order parameters for POPC-d31 as a function of C20BAS content, with a minimum observed at XA = 0.3 for each methylene position analyzed (Fig. 3 B). This observation clearly shows that the membrane is heterogeneous and that very little POPC-d31 exists in the bolalipid-rich phase until XA ≥ 0.5 (i.e., where the effects of the highly ordered transmembrane bolalipid reverse the downward trend of order parameter between XA = 0–0.3 and enforce more highly ordered POPC-d31 conformations). We attribute the decrease in POPC-d31 order at XA = 0–0.3 to the presence of U-shaped bolalipid conformers that disrupt POPC chain packing in the POPC-rich phase. Room-temperature 2H NMR spectra of C20BAS/POPC-d31 membranes did not reveal multiple spectral components of POPC-d31 as a function of XA, as was observed for [10′,11′-2H2]C20BAS/POPC in Lα phase bolalipid- and POPC-rich domains. Potential explanations for this finding include the possibility that the order parameter is not significantly different for POPC distributed in the two different phases (42), or that the POPC-d31 molecules migrate between the bolalipid- and POPC-rich domains at a rate faster than the NMR timescale.

At equimolar ratios of C20BAS and POPC-d31, a typical gel-phase powder-type and de-Paked spectrum for POPC-d31 was found at −60°C (Fig. 4), which transformed into a Lα phase spectrum at temperatures of ≥10°C. Evidence of coexisting Lβ and Lα phases was observed, however, at intermediate temperatures, most noticeably at 4°C. We infer from this finding that POPC is populating both the bolalipid- and POPC-rich domains where the two domains exhibit different melting transitions. Since the bolalipid-rich phase is expected to have a higher Tm than the POPC-rich phase, based on the known melting transition temperatures of the corresponding pure lipid phases, POPC molecules that disperse into the bolalipid-rich phase will exist in a gel phase state at 4°C, whereas POPC present in the POPC-rich domains will exist in the Lα state at this temperature. This was the only concentration at which this phenomenon was clearly visualized, perhaps because the spectral line-broadening and weak intensities that are typical of gel-phase membranes made the signal too weak to observe at other concentrations.

We used molecular mean theory to further evaluate our 2H NMR observations. The free energy per molecule was calculated, allowing a prediction as to whether a membrane of a given molar concentration of C20BAS is in the Lβ or Lα phase. Using the findings of phase separation into C20BAS-rich and POPC-rich membranes via hydrophobic mismatch as previously described (42), the expected phases for these membranes were calculated at 4°C for the C20BAS-rich domains at XA = 0.9, where gel phase lipids are predicted (Fig. 5 B), and the POPC-rich domains at XA = 0.1, where a Lα phase is predicted (Fig. 5 C). Under phase-separated conditions, the 2H NMR spectra of POPC in the Lβ and Lα phases are expected to display substantially different order parameters (Fig. 5 D). Our calculations are consistent with the two-phase spectra observed in Fig. 4. It should be noted that the prediction of two different spectra for POPC is not trivial, since earlier work suggested that the spectra of POPC in the C20BAS-rich and POPC-rich phases would not be substantially different, based on the assumption that both would be in the Lα phase (42). (The expectation of similar 2H NMR spectra for C20BAS-rich and POPC-rich Lα phases, analogous to the lo and ld phases of ternary systems, is actually observed at higher temperatures; vide supra.) Although the coexisting concentrations of the C20BAS-rich and POPC-rich phases may be different from those predicted in Fig. 5, the structure of the lipid layers at the actual coexistence concentrations will not deviate from those calculated because the phase-separated domain structure is defined by the most abundant component (Fig. 1, B–D). Since order parameters are structural properties of the membrane lipids, the conclusions drawn from Fig. 5 about the organization of the coexisting domains remain valid.

SAXS experiments were utilized to determine the effect of bolalipid molar ratio on global phase behavior of C20BAS/POPC mixed membranes in excess water. Two or more distinct D-spacings would be observed if macrophase-separated domains (e.g., distinct multilamellar vesicles) existed within the samples. Since a single distinct lamellar repeat distance was observed, corresponding to an ensemble average of bolalipid- and POPC-rich domains, these observations are consistent with the presence of microphase-separated domains in the mixed membrane samples, as opposed to macrophase separation. SAXS profiles were recorded for membrane mixtures at several different bolalipid contents and found to have a minimum in D-spacing at XA = 0.9. The progression toward smaller repeat distances as the concentration of C20BAS in the membrane increases is not surprising given the smaller hydrophobic thickness of bolalipid membranes, and the expected increased stiffness based on the measured NMR order parameters. The smaller D-spacings observed at XA = 0.7 and 0.9, relative to XA = 1, are attributed to the effect of the low POPC molar ratios acting as an impurity in the bolalipid-rich membrane that causes thinning and lateral expansion of the membrane.

Temperature-dependent SAXS measurements were taken for membranes composed of pure C20BAS and 1:1 C20BAS/POPC. Of interest, the D-spacings became smaller as a function of temperature for pure C20BAS dispersions, but increased for 1:1 C20BAS/POPC dispersions. Two opposing mechanisms must be considered when interpreting these results: membrane thinning due to decreased order in the acyl or alkyl chains of the lipids, and increased hydration due to thermal membrane undulations, which increase the amount of water residing between membranes. We attribute the observed difference in the D-spacing behavior for the pure C20BAS and the 1:1 C20BAS/POPC mixture to the decreased order of 1:1 C20BAS/POPC membranes. This enables greater water penetration between the lamellar layers, and thus overwhelms the influence of increased temperature on membrane thickness. Indeed, previous temperature-dependent SAXS measurements on pure POPC membranes showed repeat distances with a minimum at 30°C (49).

Conclusions

We have demonstrated using 2H NMR spectroscopy, corroborated by SAXS and molecular theory calculations, that phase separation occurs in binary mixtures of C20BAS and POPC. This observation is significant for guiding the design of bolalipids that will not phase-separate from monopolar lipids in membrane-based biosensors that employ lipid mixtures of this type. These findings may also be relevant for enhancing our understanding of phase-separation phenomena arising from hydrophobic mismatch in lo/ld domains and lipid mattressing effects in IMP/lipid mixtures.

Supporting Material

Experimental methods, six figures, two tables, and references are available at http://www.biophysj.org/biophysj/supplemental/S0006-3495(09)01427-1.

Supporting Material

Document S1. Experimental methods, six figures, two tables, and references
mmc1.pdf (552.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (CA112427 and PN2EY018230 to D.H.T., and EY012049 and EY018891 to M.F.B.) and the National Science Foundation (CBET-0828046 and EE-0503943 to I.S.).

References

  • 1.Dietrich C., Bagatolli L.A., Volovyk Z.N., Thompson N.L., Levi M. Lipid rafts reconstituted in model membranes. Biophys. J. 2001;80:1417–1428. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76114-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Simons K., Ehehalt R. Cholesterol, lipid rafts, and disease. J. Clin. Invest. 2002;110:597–603. doi: 10.1172/JCI16390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edidin M. Timeline—lipids on the frontier: a century of cell-membrane bilayers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;4:414–418. doi: 10.1038/nrm1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McConnell H., Radhakrishnan A. Condensed complexes of cholesterol and phospholipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2003;1610:159–173. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(03)00015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.London E. How principles of domain formation in model membranes may explain ambiguities concerning lipid raft formation in cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2005;1746:203–220. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Silvius J.R. Partitioning of membrane molecules between raft and non-raft domains: insights from model-membrane studies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2005;1746:193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marguet D., Lenne P.F., Rigneault H., He H.T. Dynamics in the plasma membrane: how to combine fluidity and order. EMBO J. 2006;25:3446–3457. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johnston L.J. Nanoscale imaging of domains in supported lipid membranes. Langmuir. 2007;23:5886–5895. doi: 10.1021/la070108t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Veatch S.L., Polozov I.V., Gawrisch K., Keller S.L. Liquid domains in vesicles investigated by NMR and fluorescence microscopy. Biophys. J. 2004;86:2910–2922. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74342-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Connell S.D., Smith D.A. The atomic force microscope as a tool for studying phase separation in lipid membranes. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2006;23:17–28. doi: 10.1080/09687860500501158. [Review] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Polozov I.V., Gawrisch K. Characterization of the liquid-ordered state by proton MAS NMR. Biophys. J. 2006;90:2051–2061. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.070441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Filippov A., Orädd G., Lindblom G. Domain formation in model membranes studied by pulsed-field gradient-NMR: the role of lipid polyunsaturation. Biophys. J. 2007;93:3182–3190. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.111534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Veatch S.L., Soubias O., Keller S.L., Gawrisch K. Critical fluctuations in domain-forming lipid mixtures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:17650–17655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703513104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bartels T.R., Lankalapalli S., Bittman R., Beyer K., Brown M.F. Raftlike mixtures of sphingomyelin and cholesterol investigated by solid-state 2H NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:14521–14532. doi: 10.1021/ja801789t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Simons K., Vaz W.L.C. Model systems, lipid rafts, and cell membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2004;33:269–295. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thompson D.H., Wong K.F., Humphry-Baker R., Wheeler J.J., Kim J.M. Tetraether bolaform amphiphiles as models of archaebacterial membrane lipids: Raman spectroscopy, 31P NMR, X-ray scattering, and electron microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:9035–9042. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cornell B.A., Braach-Maksvytis V.L.B., King L.G., Osman P.D.J., Raguse B. A biosensor that uses ion-channel switches. Nature. 1997;387:580–583. doi: 10.1038/42432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim J.M., Patwardhan A., Bott A., Thompson D.H. Preparation and electrochemical behavior of gramicidin-bipolar lipid monolayer membranes supported on gold electrodes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2003;1617:10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Febo-Ayala W., Morera-Felix S.L., Hrycyna C.A., Thompson D.H. Functional reconstitution of the integral membrane enzyme, isoprenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase, in synthetic bolalipid membrane vesicles. Biochemistry. 2006;45:14683–14694. doi: 10.1021/bi061159c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Febo-Ayala W., Holland D.P., Bradley S.A., Thompson D.H. Lateral diffusion coefficients of an eicosanyl-based bisglycerophosphocholine determined by PFG-NMR and FRAP. Langmuir. 2007;23:6276–6280. doi: 10.1021/la063720d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Holland D.P., Struts A.V., Brown M.F., Thompson D.H. Bolalipid membrane structure revealed by solid-state 2H NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:4584–4585. doi: 10.1021/ja710190p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.De Rosa M., Gambacorta A. The lipids of archaebacteria. Prog. Lipid Res. 1988;27:153–175. doi: 10.1016/0163-7827(88)90011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Benvegnu T., Brard M., Plusquellec D. Archaeabacteria bipolar lipid analogues: structure, synthesis and lyotropic properties. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;8:469–479. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Damste J.S.S., Schouten S., Hopmans E.C., van Duin A.C.T., Geenevasen J.A.J. Crenarchaeol: the characteristic core glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraether membrane lipid of cosmopolitan pelagic crenarchaeota. J. Lipid Res. 2002;43:1641–1651. doi: 10.1194/jlr.m200148-jlr200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fuhrhop A.H., Wang T.Y. Bolaamphiphiles. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:2901–2937. doi: 10.1021/cr030602b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun X.L., Biswas N., Kai T., Dai Z.F., Dluhy R.A. Membrane-mimetic films of asymmetric phosphatidylcholine lipid bolaamphiphiles. Langmuir. 2006;22:1201–1208. doi: 10.1021/la052125t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Patel G.B., Sprott G.D. Archaeobacterial ether lipid liposomes (archaeosomes) as novel vaccine and drug delivery systems. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 1999;19:317–357. doi: 10.1080/0738-859991229170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Denoyelle S., Polidori A., Brunelle M., Vuillaume P.Y., Laurent S. Synthesis and preliminary biological studies of hemifluorinated bifunctional bolaamphiphiles designed for gene delivery. New J. Chem. 2006;30:629–646. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rethore G., Montier T., Le Gall T., Delepine P., Cammas-Marion S. Archaeosomes based on synthetic tetraether-like lipids as novel versatile gene delivery systems. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2007;20:2054–2056. doi: 10.1039/b618568a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Benvegnu T., Cammas-Marion L.L.S. Archaeal lipids: innovative materials for biotechnological applications. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008;2008:4725–4744. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Elferink M.G.L., Dewit J.G., Demel R., Driessen A.J.M., Konings W.N. Functional reconstitution of membrane-proteins in monolayer liposomes from bipolar lipids of sulfolobus-acidocaldarius. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:1375–1381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Veld G.I., Elferink M.G.L., Driessen A.J.M., Konings W.N. Reconstitution of the leucine transport-system of lactococcus-lactis into liposomes composed of membrane-spanning lipids from sulfolobus-acidocaldarius. Biochemistry. 1992;31:12493–12499. doi: 10.1021/bi00164a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Huguet C., Hopmans E.C., Febo-Ayala W., Thompson D.H., Damste J.S.S. An improved method to determine the absolute abundance of glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraether lipids. Org. Geochem. 2006;37:1036–1041. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grather O., Arigoni D. Detection of regioisomeric macrocyclic tetraethers in the lipids of methanobacterium-thermoautotrophicum and other archaeal organisms. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1995;4:405–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Svenson S., Thompson D.H. Facile and efficient synthesis of bolaamphiphilic tetraether phosphocholines. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:7180–7182. doi: 10.1021/jo9803176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang G.J., Hollingsworth R.I. Synthesis and properties of a bipolar, bisphosphatidyl ethanolamine that forms stable 2-dimensional self-assembled bilayer systems and liposomes. J. Org. Chem. 1999;64:4140–4147. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Patwardhan A.P., Thompson D.H. Novel flexible and rigid tetraether acyclic and macrocyclic bisphosphocholines: synthesis and monolayer properties. Langmuir. 2000;16:10340–10350. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kai T., Sun X.L., Faucher K.M., Apkarian R.P., Chaikof E.L. Design and synthesis of asymmetric acyclic phospholipid bolaamphiphiles. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:2606–2615. doi: 10.1021/jo048167o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Melikyan G.B., Matinyan N.S., Kocharov S.L., Arakelian V.B., Prangishvili D.A. Electromechanical stability of planar lipid-membranes from bipolar lipids of the thermoacidophilic archebacterium sulfolobus-acidocaldarius. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1991;1068:245–248. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(91)90215-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Delfino J.M., Schreiber S.L., Richards F.M. Design, synthesis, and properties of a photoactivatable membrane-spanning phospholipidic probe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:3458–3474. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cuccia L.A., Morin F., Beck A., Hebert N., Just G. Spanning or looping? The order and conformation of bipolar phospholipids in lipid membranes using 2H NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Eur. J. 2000;6:4379–4384. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20001201)6:23<4379::aid-chem4379>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Longo G.S., Thompson D.H., Szleifer I. Stability and phase separation in mixed monopolar lipid/bolalipid layers. Biophys. J. 2007;93:2609–2621. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.102764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McCabe M.A., Wassall S.R. Fast-Fourier-transform depaking. J. Magn. Reson. B. 1995;106:80–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ruocco M.J., Makriyannis A., Siminovitch D.J., Griffin R.G. Deuterium NMR investigation of ether-linked and ester-linked phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 1985;24:4844–4851. doi: 10.1021/bi00339a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stewart L.C., Kates M., Ekiel I.H., Smith I.C.P. Molecular order and dynamics of diphytanylglycerol phospholipids—a 2H-NMR and 31P-NMR study. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 1990;54:115–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Petrache H.I., Dodd S.W., Brown M.F. Area per lipid and acyl length distributions in fluid phosphatidylcholines determined by 2H NMR spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 2000;79:3172–3192. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76551-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Silvius J.R. Thermotropic phase transitions of pure lipids in model membranes and their modifications by membrane proteins. In: Jost P.C., Griffith O.H., editors. Lipid-Protein Interactions. John Wiley and Sons; New York: 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lindblom G., Johansson L.B.Å., Arvidson G. Effect of cholesterol in membranes. Pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of lipid lateral diffusion. Biochemistry. 1981;20:2204–2207. doi: 10.1021/bi00511a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pabst G., Rappolt M., Amenitsch H., Bernstorff S., Laggner P. X-ray kinematography of temperature-jump relaxation probes the elastic properties of fluid bilayers. Langmuir. 2000;2000:8994–9001. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Meglio C.D., Rananacare S.B., Svenson S., Thompson D.H. Bolaamphiphilic phosphocholines: structure and phase behavior in aqueous media. Langmuir. 2000;16:128–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Caffrey M., Fiegenson G.W. Fluorescence quenching in model membranes. 3. Relationship between calcium adenosine-triphosphatase enzyme-activity and the affinity of the protein for phosphatidycholines with different acyl chain characteristics. Biochemistry. 1981;20:1949–1961. doi: 10.1021/bi00510a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Experimental methods, six figures, two tables, and references
mmc1.pdf (552.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES