Skip to main content
American Journal of Translational Research logoLink to American Journal of Translational Research
. 2009 Apr 20;1(3):235–248.

Molecular mechanisms involving prostate cancer racial disparity

David Hatcher 1, Garrett Daniels 1, Iman Osman 1, Peng Lee 1
PMCID: PMC2776319  PMID: 19956434

Abstract

African American (AA) men with prostate cancer (PCa) have worse disease, with a higher incidence, younger age and more advanced disease at diagnosis, and a worse prognosis, compared to Caucasian (CA) men. In addition to socioeconomic factors and lifestyle differences, molecular alterations contribute to this discrepancy. In this review, we summarize molecular genetics research results interrelated with the biology of PCa racial disparity. Androgen and androgen receptor (AR) pathways have long been associated with prostate growth. Racial differences have also been found among variants of the genes of the enzymes involved in androgen biosynthesis and metabolism, such as SRD5A2, CYP17, and CYP3A4. The levels of expression and CAG repeat length of AR also show racial divergence and may be critical molecular alterations for racial disparity. Growth factors and their receptors, which promote cancer cell growth, are another potential cause of the disparity; both EGFR and EPHB2, two of the most studied receptors, show interethnic differences. Differences have also been found among genes regulating cell apoptosis, such as BCL2, which is increased in PCa in the AA population. Recent developments in genetics, proteomics, and genomics, among other molecular biotechnologies, will greatly aid the advancement of translational research on PCa racial disparity, hopefully culminating in the discovery of novel mechanisms of disease, in addition to prognostic markers and novel therapeutic approaches.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, disparity, incidence, prognosis, molecular genetics, SRD5A2, CYP17, CYP3A4

Introduction

The incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) varies widely between ethnic populations and countries. PCa is the most common male-specific cancer in most Western countries [13]. In the US, there were an estimated 186,320 new cases in 2008 [4], and it was the second leading cause of cancer related deaths after lung and bronchus carcinoma [4]. PCa disproportionately affects African American (AA) men, who have a higher incidence of PCa, present at a younger age and with more advanced disease, and have a worse prognosis than men of other ethnicities [58].

Along with positive family history and older age, African ancestry has long been recognized as an important risk factor for PCa [2, 9]. The underlying reasons for this disparity are not well understood, although existing evidence implicates important genetic components. While it has been argued that racial variation may be largely due to lifestyle, dietary, socioeconomic [10, 11], or clinical factors, these cannot fully explain the discrepancy [68, 12] or the results of migration studies, and consequently, genetic parameters may be important. Studies of the pathology and recurrence of tumors in AA and CA men have suggested that racial differences in the biology of PCa tumors may explain observed differences in outcome [13, 14]. We studied men treated with radical prostatectomy at an equal-access-to-care facility and found AA men continue to have higher PSA levels and Gleason scores than CA men in the 2000s, despite a narrowing of the differences in pathologic stage [15]. Our data also suggests that socioeconomic factors have limited impact on PSA recurrence in AA men treated with radical prostatectomy [16] in this group of patients. Thus, the distinct behaviors of AA and CA PCa might be biologically or genetically encoded. This article summarizes the previous and current molecular research findings related to PCa racial disparity (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of altered genetic polymorphisms and variants of key genes in cancer pathways, changing susceptibility to prostate cancer across race

Gene Cancer Pathway Racial Heterogeneity of Gene Mutations and Expressions References
Serum Androgen  - AA shown to have higher mean serum testosterone levels (about 15%) than CA 17, 18
AR Gene transcription CAG and GGC repeat length
 - expression of AR protein was 22% higher in the benign prostate and 81% higher in PCa in AA than CA 23
 - AA men tend to have significantly shorter repeats than CA men 24, 31, 32
 - among low risk of PCa (normal PSA and prostate examination), nearly twice as many AA have a CAG repeat length less than 20 compared with CA men
SRD5A2 Androgen conversion (DHT) TA repeat alleles
 - present in only AA, not in CA or Asian 155
A49T variants
 - increase DHT production, particularly in AA and Hispanic 39
CYP17 Androgen synthesis A1 and A2 alleles
 - polymorphisms may have a role in PCa susceptibility in AA but not CA 52
 - A2 allele was slightly less frequent in AA versus CA, but another study had the opposite finding 39
CYP3A4 Androgen deactivation G variant
 - considerably more common among AA (>50%) than CA (<10%), Hispanic, or Asian 58–61
 - in CA, associated with a higher clinical grade and stage, especially if PCa was diagnosed at an older age (≥ 64), and is predictive of progression
 - in AA strongly associated with PCa that had aggressive characteristics at diagnosis 67
 - after prostatectomy, increasing copies were found to be associated with worse progression-free survival among CA but had virtually no impact on AA 71
IGF-1 and IGFB-3 Growth factors  - AA men have been found to have higher IGF-1 and lower IGFB-3 levels 72
EGFR Growth factor receptor/Signal transduction CA repeat length
 - the longer allele is significantly more common in Asian individuals and is associated with an 80% reduction in EGFR protein expression compared with the shorter allele 82, 83
 - EGFR overexpression in PCa is more common in AA (45%) than CA (18%) 80, 86
 - no correlation found in another study 87
TK domain
 - 4 novel missense mutations found: 3 in Koreans and 1 in CA but none in AA 88
EphB2 Tyrosinne kinase receptor/Tumor suppressor K1019X mutation 93
 - higher in AA with a family history of PCa (15.3%) than CA controls (1.7%)
 - associated with increased risk for PCa in AA with a family history
 - risk for PCa was increased 3-fold among AA who carried at least one copy of the allele and had a family history of PCa
BCL-2 Apoptosis  - linkage between increased cancer proliferation and BCL-2 positively seen in prostate tumors in AA but not in CA 94
MDM2 p53 regulator  - expression was significantly greater in CA than AA patients (78% CA, 45% AA) 110
short arm of chromosome 8 (8p22-23) (potential) Tumor suppressor short arm deletion
 - conflicting findings 128 – 130
miRNAs Regulation of transcription and translation let-7c and miR30c
 - higher let-7c and 30c expression in PCa tissue in AA than in CA, but only let-7c remained statistically significant after normalization D. Hatcher and P. Lee, unpublished data
MSR1 common MSR1 sequence variants
 - in AA, germline mutations was associated with an increased risk of PCa 152
 - in CA, five common sequence variants had significantly different allele frequencies among men with PCa compared with unaffected men, with each, except INDEL7, associated with an elevated risk for PCa 153
 - in AA, Asp174Tyr mutation is nearly twice as common among PCa patients compared with controls; however, none were associated with a significantly increased risk of PCa 112

Androgens, androgen receptor, and involved pathways

Androgens and the androgen receptor pathway constitute the most intensely studied field in PCa. Several aspects of the pathway are related to the racial disparity of PCa.

Serum androgen levels

Young AA men were shown to have higher mean serum testosterone levels (about 15%) than CA men [17], and another study of men aged 31 to 50 also showed a significantly higher mean serum testosterone level among AA men [18], which may be related to the higher risk of PCa in AA men. There is conflicting evidence on the role of androgens in the growth and differentiation of prostate tumors. Elevated testosterone and dihydro-testosterone (DHT) have not been persuasively shown to increase the risk of PCa, with some groups reporting that serum hormones levels are higher in PCa patients while others found no differences [1, 3]. Although there is no clear relationship between circulating androgen levels and PCa [1921], high levels of androgens have long been considered as risk factors [19, 22].

Androgen receptors

The human androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent nuclear transcriptional factor that regulates the expression of genes necessary for the growth and development of both normal and malignant prostate tissue. In a study of malignant and benign prostate tissue from AA and CA men who underwent radical prostatectomy for PCa, expression of AR protein was 22% higher in the benign prostate and 81% higher in PCa of AA patients by immunohistochemistry [23]. This suggests that differences in androgenic stimulation may have an important role in racial disparity.

The AR gene is over 90 kb in length and is located on chromosome Xq11–12 and consists of eight exons. Exon 1 of the gene entirely encodes the N-terminal (transactivation) domain, which controls transcriptional activation of the receptor, as well as two polymorphic trinucleotide repeats (CAG and GGC), which code for polyglutamine and polyglycine tracts, respecttively, in the N-terminal domain. Prior studies indicate that this CAG repeat varies in length from 11 to 31 repeats in normal men [24], and an inverse relationship has been demonstrated between CAG repeat length and AR transcriptional activation ability [25]. Short CAG and GGC repeat lengths have been associated with an increased risk of developping PCa [2628], specifically individuals with CAG repeat length less than 20 and GGC repeat length less than 16 [26, 2830]. Striking differences in CAG repeat lengths have been observed between populations. AA men tend to have significantly shorter repeat length than CA men [24, 31, 32]. One study examining men at low risk for PCa (normal PSA and prostate examination) found that nearly twice as many AA men have a CAG repeat length less than 20 compared with CA men [31].

Biosynthetic enzymes affecting androgen

Variants in the genes of the enzymes involved in androgen biosynthesis and metabolism are compelling candidates for susceptibility factors in PCa pathogenesis.

SRD5A2

It has been suggested that intraprostatic DHT levels may be integral to racial variations in risk [33]. Testosterone is converted to the more active metabolite, DHT, by 5α-reductase [154]. DHT binds to the AR, and the DHT-AR complex transactivates genes with AR-responsive elements [154]. Two isozyme forms of 5α-reductase have been reported, with the type II enzyme (encoded by the SRD5A2 gene) primarily expressed in genital skin and the prostate [34]. One study revealed that this gene is more polymorphic than previously assumed, and that certain polymorphisms are restricted to AA men [35]. This was supported by the finding of SRD5A2 TA repeat alleles that are only present in high-risk AA men and not in lower risk CA and Asian men [155]. Thus, it has been proposed that certain steroid 5α-reductase enzyme variants encoded by SRD5A2 genes marked by particular TA repeat alleles may result in an elevation of enzyme activity, leading to an increased prostatic level of DHT, which may increase the risk for developing PCa.

Furthermore, the V89L and A49T variants of the SRD5A2 gene have been shown to alter the conversion of testosterone to DHT [36, 37]. While the V89L polymorphism is believed to decrease the production of DHT [38], the A49T variant is thought to increase its production, particularly in AA and Hispanic men [39].

CYP17

Located on chromosome 10, the CYP17 gene encodes the cytochrome P450c17a enzyme [40], which mediates both 17α-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase activities at key points in testosterone biosynthesis in the gonads and adrenals [40]. The 5'-untranslated promoter region of CYP17 contains a polymorphic T-to-C substitution that gives rise to A1 (T) and A2 (C) alleles [41]. Some studies have indicated that the A2 allele may be associated with an increased risk of PCa [4247]; however, other results have either been inconclusive [48, 49] or showed a possible increased risk from the A1 allele [50, 51]. The results of a meta-analysis suggest that CYP17 polymorphisms may have a role in PCa susceptibility in AA but not CA men [52]. The A2 allele was slightly less frequent in AA versus CA men, but a different study had the opposite finding [53]. Ultimately, there may be little difference in A2 frequency and a null effect of the CYP17 polymorphism on androgen levels.

CYP3A4

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), a protein in the cytochrome P-450 supergene family, facilitates the oxidative deactivation of testosterone to biologically less active metabolites [5456], the inhibition of which would result in increased levels of testosterone. CYP3A4 also has a role in the oxidative metabolism of finasteride [57] and could impact its effectiveness in PCa treatment. Studies of the CYP3A4 variant indicate that it may be a determinant of PCa risk. A germline genetic variant in the 5' regulatory region of the CYP3A4 gene (A to G transition) on chromosome 7 has been reported. This variant G allele (referred to as CYP3A4 G variant) was found to be considerably more common among AA men (gene frequency >50%) than CA (<10%), Hispanic, or Asian men [5861]. Previous studies found little evidence of altered function in the CYP3A4 G variant [6264], but studies later found it was associated with a higher clinical grade and stage, especially if PCa was diagnosed at an older age (≥ 64), and is predictive of progression among CA men. They expected to see a similar impact among AA men but did not [5860]. In other research, the G variant was inversely associated with risk among men with less aggressive PCa [65, 66]. Another study found that among AA men, the CYP3A4 variant was strongly associated with PCa that had aggressive characteristics at diagnosis [67].

Although these observations support a role for the CYP3A4 variant as a biologic marker of the aggressiveness of PCa, laboratory investigations have found relatively little evidence of functional effects from this polymorphism [6264, 68, 69]. However, among certain patients with PCa, several other SNPs in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 are associated with risk [66, 70]. Elsewhere, in a follow-up study of men who underwent prostatectomy, increasing copies of the CYP3A4 variant were found to be associated with worse progression-free survival among CA men but had virtually no impact on AA men [71]. While the above data indicate that differences in CYP3A4 exist between AA and CA patients, a better understanding of androgen metabolism and signaling pathways is needed to understand the effect of the G variant in AA men.

Growth factors and receptors

The most studied growth factor receptors concerning the racial disparity of PCa are EGFR and EPHB2. In addition, AA men have been found to have higher IGF-1 and lower IGFB-3 levels, which may cause higher tumor growth with lower anti-tumor activity [72].

EGFR

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a critical role in cellular proliferation, escape from apoptosis, and promotion of tumor cell invasion and is the target of anticancer agents, based on evidence that increased EGFR signaling is crucial for prostate carcinogenesis [73]. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that the EGFR signaling pathway is critical in the progression to androgen-independent disease [74, 75]. Moreover, studies have shown that EGFR inhibitors effectively hinder the growth of both androgen-dependent and androgen-independent PCa xenografts [7678]. Several studies have found an increase of EGFR expression in androgen-independent and metastatic PCa [79, 80] as well as after androgen ablation [81].

EGFR is shown to be related to PCa racial disparity through intronic dinucleotide (CA) repeats and EGFR overexpression [82, 83]. Studies have demonstrated major racial differences in a dinucleotide (CA)n repeat polymorphism in intron 1 of the EGFR gene [83, 84]. The number of CA repeats (which ranges from 14 to 21) has been found to be correlated with transcriptional activity [82, 85]. Specifically, it was shown that the longer allele is significantly more common in Asian individuals [83] and is associated with an 80% reduction in EGFR protein expression compared with the shorter allele [82].

EGFR overexpression in PCa is more common in AA than CA patients [80, 86]. We reported a significant association between EGFR over-expression and AA race (45% in AA versus 18% in CA) [86]. Although one group reported no correlation between EGFR expression and race [87], their conclusion was based on a small number of AA patients. In addition to its over-expression, we identified 4 novel missense mutations in the EGFR TK domain, 3 in Koreans and 1 in CA but none in AA patients [88]. Three of the four EGFR kinase domain mutations are oncogenic in nature.

EPHB2

The EphB2 gene encodes the EPHB2 receptor tyrosine kinase. The characteristics of EphB2 and its location near a suspected PCa locus make it a potential candidate gene for PCa susceptibility. Several lines of evidence, including its inactivation in the DU145 PCa cell line and growth inhibition from its over-expression, suggest EphB2 may be a tumor suppressor gene [89].

EphB2 maps to 1p36, which was previously shown to be linked with hereditary PCa among racially diverse families [90, 91], including AA [92]. One study evaluated the role of EphB2 in PCa susceptibility in AA men by screening the EphB2 gene for germline polymorphisms. They identified ten sequence variants in the EphB2 gene, including a common nonsense mutation, K1019X, among AA PCa patients. Their data show that the K1019X mutation in the EphB2 gene differs in frequency between AA and CA men and is associated with increased risk for PCa in AA men with a positive family history [93]. This variant was observed in much higher frequency among AA PCa patients than among healthy AA men. In fact, the risk for PCa was increased 3-fold among AA men who carried at least one copy of the K1019X allele and had a family history of PCa. Given its high frequency in hereditary cases, K1019X likely is associated with familial PCa in AA men.

Differences in apoptotic genes in relation to prostate cancer racial disparity

Anti-apoptotic Bcl-2

Studies show that altered expression of the BCL-2 gene may be an important factor underlying the greater aggressiveness of PCa in AA men [94]. This gene has a central role in preventing cancer cells from dying, via its anti-apoptotic effect, and its up-regulation in AA men may be responsible for PCa cell survival and resistance to therapies. Thus, the connection between BCL-2 positively and increased proliferation seen in prostate tumors in AA but not in CA men may contribute to the aggressive behavior of PCa in AA men [94].

MDM2

In response to stress, cells activate a complex pathway involving tumor suppressor p53 that is responsible for cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis as protection from the deleterious effects of mutation [95]. MDM2 is a key negative regulator of tumor suppressor p53, by targeting p53 for proteasomal degradation [9698]. We previously reported that MDM2 overexpression was significantly associated with advanced stage PCa [99], a finding later reproduced by other investigators [100, 101]. Recent studies have also shown that inhibiting MDM2 expression enhances the effects of radiation and chemotherapy on PCa cells [102104]. A single nucleotide polymerphism in the MDM2 promoter, SNP309, enhances transcriptional activation of MDM2 and has been associated with early onset of several types of cancer [105109].

To determine if the MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism plays a role in the aggressive phenotype seen in AA PCa, we examined the association between MDM2 SNP309 and MDM2 protein levels in PCa patients of different racial backgrounds [110]. Somewhat surprisingly, we found MDM2 protein expression was significantly greater in CA than AA patients (78% versus 45%, respectively). While MDM2 and AA ethnicity have both been associated with poor prognosis, the relationship between the two variables in our study was neither causative nor correlative. Thus, while MDM2 expression in PCa differs between AA and CA patients, the data does not support a role for the MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism in the development of aggressive PCa in AA patients.

Genetics variations between AA and CA prostate cancer

Evidence that PCa may be caused by multiple genes, interacting in complex manners, possibly with environmental factors, has continued to grow [1, 2, 9, 39, 46, 58, 71, 111114]. There may be ethnic variation in the frequency of alleles that may be associated with PCa risk and/or progression. Although the incidence and mortality for PCa may differ among different racial groups, the increased risk for PCa attributed to family history of this disease is consistent across different racial backgrounds, supporting the possibility of a common genetic basis of disease [115]. The analysis of genetic alterations in PCa is challenging because PCa often has genetic and morphological heterogeneity and multifocality, the presence of more than one lesion of independent origin [116119]. Linkage studies, to determine if the tumors in AA men are different from those in CA men, have identified susceptibility loci for PCa on several chromosomes and several candidate genes [9, 120].

Chromosome 8

The short arm of chromosome 8 (8p22–23) has been proposed as a potential location for one or more genes important in the development of PCa [121, 122]. The short arm of chromosome 8 is frequently deleted in both adenocarcinomas and PINs [123, 124], which has lead to the assumption that the inactivation of an unidentified tumor suppressor gene on 8p is involved in prostate tumor initiation [125127]. Studies of chromosome 8p loss in AA and CA men have generated conflicting findings. One group [128] reported a racial difference in the distribution of 8p loss, but another group reported none [129]. Another group found no differences during both tumor initiation and progression, suggesting similar molecular events between CA and AA men [130]; however, they did find racial differences in the association between disease recurrence and several prognostic factors of cancer progression, including Gleason score, surgical margin, and TNM stage. This was a significant finding given the similar baseline profiles of the two groups.

miRNA

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small, endogenous, non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the levels of transcription and translation [131, 132]. miRNA inhibits translation of target genes involved in a variety of fundamental cellular processes including organ development, differentiation, and cancer formation [133136]]. Functional studies of individual miRNAs have since shown that miRNAs can act as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes [137141]. We showed that miRNAs are differently dysregulated in neoplasms other than PCa, such as uterine leiomyomas between AA and CA women, indicating that miRNA expression is associated with the racial disparity of cancer [142]. In prostate, the expression of 5 miRNAs, miR-30c, miR-301, miR-219, miR-261, and miR-1b1, were reported racially different in benign prostate tissue [143]. We recently examined the expression of commonly dysregulated miRNAs in PCa in relation to race and revealed racial difference for the expression of let-7c and miR30c in AA prostate tissue (D. Hatcher and P. Lee, unpublished data). Thus, miRNA might play a role in the racial disparity of PCa.

Distinct gene expression and genome-wide copy number variation between AA and CA prostate cancer

Currently, we are taking a genome-wide approach to studying the more aggressive clinical behavior of PCa in AA patients compared to CA patients. Gene expression profiling with Affymetrix microarray revealed distinct clustering of patients by racial group (I. Osman, unpublished data). We also identified 27 chromosomal regions with significantly different copy number changes between AA and CA patients. Copy number changes were also significantly associated with gene expression changes. 28 chromosomal regions were significantly different between the AA and CA PCa. 11 regions were more commonly altered in AA patients compared to CA patients [144]. This data further suggests there are distinct genetic differences contributing to racial difference in PCa.

PSA levels in AA and CA prostate cancer patients

The PSA test, approved by the FDA in 1986 for monitoring disease status and in 1992 for disease diagnosis, is performed on symptomatic and asymptomatic men in an effort to diagnose PCa early and to monitor disease recurrence and progression [145]. Past surveys of urologists revealed significant variation in the use of the PSA test [146], including racial disparities in PSA surveillance, with AA men half as likely as CA men to receive annual monitoring [147]. After the 1995 publication of clinical guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the American Urological Association, and the American College of Radiology, however, there has been an increase in evidence-based staging techniques and a decrease in racial disparities [148]. A recent study concluded that PSA testing is probably not able to explain current racial differences in PCa mortality rates [149].

Interestingly, recently a relationship was reported between serum PSA levels and polymorphisms in the PSA and AR genes [150]. Specifically, serum PSA levels increased by 7% with each decreasing AR CAG repeat allele size among individuals homozygous for a single nucleotide polymorphism in the PSA gene promoter. A recent study of the ERDA1 locus revealed that large CAG repeats are more common among Asian populations, less common in populations of European ancestry, and least common in African populations [151]. This pattern is very similar to that which was observed in the study of the AR trinucleotide repeats.

Other genes potentially involved in PCA racial disparity

MSR1

Recently, the macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1) gene has been proposed as a link between germline alterations in 8p and PCa [152, 153]. Both common sequence variants and rare germline mutations have been suggested as potential PCa susceptibility factors. Several rare germline mutations of the MSR1 gene were found to cosegregate with PCa, and at least one of the germline mutations was associated with an increased risk of PCa among AA men [152]. In a subsequent study of CA men, the same authors examined five common sequence variants of MSR1 and reported significantly different allele frequencies for each of the variants among men with PCa compared with unaffected men [153], with each, except INDEL7, associated with an elevated risk for PCa. An ensuing study examined each of these five common MSR1 sequence variants in AA men [112]. They found that the Asp174Tyr mutation is nearly twice as common among PCa patients compared with controls; however, after adjusting for age, none of the sequence variants were associated with a significantly increased risk of PCa, providing limited support for an association in AA men.

Conclusion

Though studies show a biological basis behind the racial disparity of PCa, more studies are needed. Current technologies will allow a more focused approach towards identifying those genetic and biological factors involved in the racial disparity of PCa, leading to the discovery of new prognostic markers and novel therapeutic approaches to this disease.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by DOD PCRP grants to GD (PC051346), PL (PC080010) and IO (PC040021)

References

  • 1.Crawford ED. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. Urology. 2003;62:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gronberg H. Prostate cancer epidemiology. Lancet. 2003;361:859–864. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12713-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haas GP, Sakr WA. Epidemiology of pros-tate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47:273–287. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.47.5.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cotter MP, Gern RW, Ho GY, Chang RY, Burk RD. Role of family history and ethnicity on the mode and age of prostate cancer presen-tation. Prostate. 2002;50:216–221. doi: 10.1002/pros.10051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoffman RM, Gilliland FD, Eley JW, Harlan LC, Stephenson RA, Stanford JL, Albertson PC, Hamilton AS, Hunt WC, Potosky AL. Racial and ethnic differences in advanced-stage prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:388–395. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.5.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thompson I, Tangen C, Tolcher A, Crawford E, Eisenberger M, Moinpour C. Association of African-American ethnic background with survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:219–225. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.3.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Platz EA, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Kantoff PW, Giovannucci E. Racial variation in prostate cancer incidence and in hormonal system markers among male health professionals. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:2009–2017. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.24.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schaid DJ. The complex genetic epidemiology of prostate cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13 Spec No 1:R103–121. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Du XL, Fang S, Coker AL, Sanderson M, Aragaki C, Cormier JN, Xing Y, Gor BJ, Chan W. Racial disparity and socioeconomic status in association with survival in older men with local/regional stage prostate carcinoma: findings from a large community-based cohort. Cancer. 2006;106:1276–1285. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reddy S, Shapiro M, Morton R, Jr, Brawley OW. Prostate cancer in black and white Americans. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:83–86. doi: 10.1023/a:1022216119066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Robbins AS, Whittemore AS, Thom DH. Differences in socioeconomic status and survi-val among white and black men with prostate cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:409–416. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Powell IJ. Prostate cancer in the African American: is this a different disease? Semin Urol Oncol. 1998;16:221–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Robbins AS, Whittemore AS, Van Den Eeden SK. Race, prostate cancer survival, and membership in a large health maintenance organization. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:986–990. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.13.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Berger AD, Satagopan J, Lee P, Taneja SS, Osman I. Differences in clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer between black and white patients treated in the 1990s and 2000s. Urology. 2006;67:120–124. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dash A, Lee P, Zhou Q, Jean-Gilles J, Taneja S, Satagopan J, Reuter V, Gerald W, Eastham J, Osman I. Impact of socioeconomic factors on prostate cancer outcomes in black patients treated with surgery. Urology. 2008;72:641–646. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ross R, Bernstein L, Judd H, Hanisch R, Pike M, Henderson B. Serum testosterone levels in healthy young black and white men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986;76:45–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ellis L, Nyborg H. Racial/ethnic variations in male testosterone levels: a probable contributor to group differences in health. Steroids. 1992;57:72–75. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(92)90032-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wolk A, Andersson SO, Bergstrom R. Prospective study of sex hormone levels and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:820. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.11.820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pienta KJ, Goodson JA, Esper PS. Epidemiology of prostate cancer: molecular and environmental clues. Urology. 1996;48:676–683. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00219-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Meikle AW, Smith JA., Jr Epidemiology of prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 1990;17:709–718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Makridakis NM, Reichardt JK. Molecular epidemiology of hormone-metabolic loci in prostate cancer. Epidemiol Rev. 2001;23:24–29. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a000791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gaston KE, Kim D, Singh S, Ford OH, 3rd, Mohler JL. Racial differences in androgen receptor protein expression in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;170:990–993. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000079761.56154.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Edwards A, Hammond HA, Jin L, Caskey CT, Chakraborty R. Genetic variation at five trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeat loci in four human population groups. Genomics. 1992;12:241–253. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90371-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chamberlain NL, Driver ED, Miesfeld RL. The length and location of CAG trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor N-terminal domain affect transactivation function. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:3181–3186. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.15.3181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Krithivas K, Brown M, Dahl D, Brufsky A, Talcott J, Hennekens CH, Kantoff PW. The CAG repeat within the androgen receptor gene and its relationship to prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3320–3323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hardy DO, Scher HI, Bogenreider T, Sabbatini P, Zhang ZF, Nanus DM, Catterall JF. Androgen receptor CAG repeat lengths in prostate cancer: correlation with age of onset. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:4400–4405. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.12.8954049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Platz EA, Giovannucci E, Dahl DM, Krithivas K, Hennekens CH, Brown M, Stampfer MJ, Kantoff PW. The androgen receptor gene GGN microsatellite and prostate cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7:379–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ingles SA, Ross RK, Yu MC, Irvine RA, La Pera G, Haile RW, Coetzee GA. Association of prostate cancer risk with genetic polymerphisms in vitamin D receptor and androgen receptor. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:166–170. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.2.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stanford JL, Just JJ, Gibbs M, Wicklund KG, Neal CL, Blumenstein BA, Ostrander EA. Polymorphic repeats in the androgen receptor gene: molecular markers of prostate cancer risk. Cancer Res. 1997;57:1194–1198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sartor O, Zheng Q, Eastham JA. Androgen receptor gene CAG repeat length varies in a race-specific fashion in men without prostate cancer. Urology. 1999;53:378–380. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00481-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Irvine RA, Yu MC, Ross RK, Coetzee GA. The CAG and GGC microsatellites of the androgen receptor gene are in linkage disequilibrium in men with prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55:1937–1940. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ross RK, Bernstein L, Lobo RA, Shimizu H, Stanczyk FZ, Pike MC, Henderson BE. 5-alpha-reductase activity and risk of prostate cancer among Japanese and US white and black males. Lancet. 1992;339:887–889. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90927-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wilson JD, Griffin JE, Russell DW. Steroid 5 alpha-reductase 2 deficiency. Endocr Rev. 1993;14:577–593. doi: 10.1210/edrv-14-5-577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reichardt JK, Makridakis N, Henderson BE, Yu MC, Pike MC, Ross RK. Genetic variability of the human SRD5A2 gene: implications for prostate cancer risk. Cancer Res. 1995;55:3973–3975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Montie JE, Pienta KJ. Review of the role of androgenic hormones in the epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Urology. 1994;43:892–899. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(94)90163-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Anwar R, Gilbey SG, New JP, Markham AF. Male pseudohermaphroditism resulting from a novel mutation in the human steroid 5 alpha-reductase type 2 gene (SRD5A2) Mol Pathol. 1997;50:51–52. doi: 10.1136/mp.50.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Makridakis N, Ross RK, Pike MC, Chang L, Stanczyk FZ, Kolonel LN, Shi CY, Yu MC, Henderson BE, Reichardt JK. A prevalent missense substitution that modulates activity of prostatic steroid 5alpha-reductase. Cancer Res. 1997;57:1020–1022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Makridakis NM, Ross RK, Pike MC, Crocitto LE, Kolonel LN, Pearce CL, Henderson BE, Reichardt JK. Association of mis-sense substitution in SRD5A2 gene with prostate cancer in African-American and Hispanic men in Los Angeles, USA. Lancet. 1999;354:975–978. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11282-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Picado-Leonard J, Miller WL. Cloning and sequence of the human gene for P450c17 (steroid 17 alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase): similarity with the gene for P450c21. DNA. 1987;6:439–448. doi: 10.1089/dna.1987.6.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Carey AH, Waterworth D, Patel K, White D, Little J, Novelli P, Franks S, Williamson R. Polycystic ovaries and premature male pattern baldness are associated with one allele of the steroid metabolism gene CYP17. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3:1873–1876. doi: 10.1093/hmg/3.10.1873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lunn RM, Bell DA, Mohler JL, Taylor JA. Prostate cancer risk and polymorphism in 17 hydroxylase (CYP17) and steroid reductase (SRD5A2) Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:1727–1731. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.9.1727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gsur A, Bernhofer G, Hinteregger S, Haidinger G, Schatzl G, Madersbacher S, Marberger M, Vutuc C, Micksche M. A polymorphism in the CYP17 gene is associated with prostate cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2000;87:434–437. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20000801)87:3<434::aid-ijc19>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yamada Y, Watanabe M, Murata M, Yamanaka M, Kubota Y, Ito H, Katoh T, Kawamura J, Yatani R, Shiraishi T. Impact of genetic polymorphisms of 17-hydroxylase cytochrome P-450 (CYP17) and steroid 5alpha-reductase type II (SRD5A2) genes on prostate-cancer risk among the Japanese population. Int J Cancer. 2001;92:683–686. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20010601)92:5<683::aid-ijc1255>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Haiman CA, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, Ma J, Decalo NE, Kantoff PW, Hunter DJ. The relationship between a polymorphism in CYP17 with plasma hormone levels and prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:743–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kittles RA, Panguluri RK, Chen W, Massac A, Ahaghotu C, Jackson A, Ukoli F, Adams-Campbell L, Isaacs W, Dunston GM. Cyp17 promoter variant associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness in African Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:943–947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stanford JL, Noonan EA, Iwasaki L, Kolb S, Chadwick RB, Feng Z, Ostrander EA. A polymorphism in the CYP17 gene and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:243–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chang B, Zheng SL, Isaacs SD, Wiley KE, Carpten JD, Hawkins GA, Bleecker ER, Walsh PC, Trent JM, Meyers DA, Isaacs WB, Xu J. Linkage and association of CYP17 gene in hereditary and sporadic prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2001;95:354–359. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20011120)95:6<354::aid-ijc1062>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Latil AG, Azzouzi R, Cancel GS, Guillaume EC, Cochan-Priollet B, Berthon PL, Cussenot O. Prostate carcinoma risk and allelic variants of genes involved in androgen biosynthesis and metabolism pathways. Cancer. 2001;92:1130–1137. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1130::aid-cncr1430>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wadelius M, Andersson AO, Johansson JE, Wadelius C, Rane E. Prostate cancer associated with CYP17 genotype. Pharmacogenetics. 1999;9:635–639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Habuchi T, Liqing Z, Suzuki T, Sasaki R, Tsuchiya N, Tachiki H, Shimoda N, Satoh S, Sato K, Kakehi Y, Kamoto T, Ogawa O, Kato T. Increased risk of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with a CYP17 gene polymorphism with a gene dosage effect. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5710–5713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ntais C, Polycarpou A, Ioannidis JP. Association of the CYP17 gene polymorphism with the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:120–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Feigelson HS, McKean-Cowdin R, Pike MC, Coetzee GA, Kolonel LN, Nomura AM, Le Marchand L, Henderson BE. Cytochrome P450c17alpha gene (CYP17) polymorphism predicts use of hormone replacement therapy. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3908–3910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Waxman DJ, Attisano C, Guengerich FP, Lapenson DP. Human liver microsomal steroid metabolism: identification of the major micro-somal steroid hormone 6 beta-hydroxylase cytochrome P-450 enzyme. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1988;263:424–436. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(88)90655-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Waxman DJ, Lapenson DP, Aoyama T, Gelboin HV, Gonzalez FJ, Korzekwa K. Steroid hormone hydroxylase specificities of eleven cDNA-expressed human cytochrome P450s. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991;290:160–166. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90602-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ozdemir V, Kalow W, Tang BK, Paterson AD, Walker SE, Endrenyi L, Kashuba AD. Evaluation of the genetic component of variability in CYP3A4 activity: a repeated drug administration method. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10:373–388. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200007000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Huskey SW, Dean DC, Miller RR, Rasmusson GH, Chiu SH. Identification of human cytochrome P450 isozymes responsible for the in vitro oxidative metabolism of finasteride. Drug Metab Dispos. 1995;23:1126–1135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rebbeck TR, Jaffe JM, Walker AH, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB. Modification of clinical presentation of prostate tumors by a novel genetic variant in CYP3A4. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1225–1229. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.16.1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Paris PL, Kupelian PA, Hall JM, Williams TL, Levin H, Klein EA, Casey G, Witte JS. Association between a CYP3A4 genetic variant and clinical presentation in African-American prostate cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:901–905. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Walker AH, Jaffe JM, Gunasegaram S, Cummings SA, Huang CS, Chern HD, Olopade OI, Weber BL, Rebbeck TR. Characterization of an allelic variant in the nifedipine-specific element of CYP3A4: ethnic distribution and implications for prostate cancer risk. Mutations in brief no. 191. Online. Hum Mutat. 1998;12:289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tayeb MT, Clark C, Ameyaw MM, Haites NE, Evans DA, Tariq M, Mobarek A, Ofori-Adjei D, McLeod HL. CYP3A4 promoter variant in Saudi, Ghanaian and Scottish Caucasian popu-lations. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10:753–756. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200011000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Westlind A, Lofberg L, Tindberg N, Andersson TB, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Interindividual differences in hepatic expression of CYP3A4: relationship to genetic polymorphism in the 5'-upstream regulatory region. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;259:201–205. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Spurdle AB, Goodwin B, Hodgson E, Hopper JL, Chen X, Purdie DM, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Chenevix-Trench G, Liddle C. The CYP3A4*1B polymorphism has no functional significance and is not associated with risk of breast or ovarian cancer. Pharmacogenetics. 2002;12:355–366. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200207000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wandel C, Witte JS, Hall JM, Stein CM, Wood AJ, Wilkinson GR. CYP3A activity in African American and European American men: population differences and functional effect of the CYP3A4*1B5'-promoter region polymer-phism. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;68:82–91. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2000.108506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Plummer SJ, Conti DV, Paris PL, Curran AP, Casey G, Witte JS. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genotypes, haplotypes, and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:928–932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Loukola A, Chadha M, Penn SG, Rank D, Conti DV, Thompson D, Cicek M, Love B, Bivolarevic V, Yang Q, Jiang Y, Hanzel DK, Dains K, Paris PL, Casey G, Witte JS. Comprehensive evaluation of the association between prostate cancer and genotypes/haplotypes in CYP17A1, CYP3A4, and SRD5A2. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:321–332. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bangsi D, Zhou J, Sun Y, Patel NP, Darga LL, Heilbrun LK, Powell IJ, Severson RK, Everson RB. Impact of a genetic variant in CYP3A4 on risk and clinical presentation of prostate cancer among white and African-American men. Urol Oncol. 2006;24:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ando Y, Tateishi T, Sekido Y, Yamamoto T, Satoh T, Hasegawa Y, Kobayashi S, Katsumata Y, Shimokata K, Saito H. Re: Modification of clinical presentation of prostate tumors by a novel genetic variant in CYP3A4. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1587–1590. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.18.1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ball SE, Scatina J, Kao J, Ferron GM, Fruncillo R, Mayer P, Weinryb I, Guida M, Hopkins PJ, Warner N, Hall J. Population distribution and effects on drug metabolism of a genetic variant in the 5' promoter region of CYP3A4. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;66:288–294. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Patterson LH, McKeown SR, Robson T, Gallagher R, Raleigh SM, Orr S. Antitumour prodrug development using cytochrome P450 (CYP) mediated activation. Anticancer Drug Des. 1999;14:473–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Powell IJ, Zhou J, Sun Y, Sakr WA, Patel NP, Heilbrun LK, Everson RB. CYP3A4 genetic variant and disease-free survival among white and black men after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2004;172:1848–1852. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142779.76603.be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Winter DL, Hanlon AL, Raysor SL, Watkins-Bruner D, Pinover WH, Hanks GE, Tricoli JV. Plasma levels of IGF-1, IGF-2, and IGFBP-3 in white and African-American men at increased risk of prostate cancer. Urology. 2001;58:614–618. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01273-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ratan HL, Gescher A, Steward WP, Mellon JK. ErbB receptors: possible therapeutic targets in prostate cancer? BJU Int. 2003;92:890–895. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sherwood ER, Van Dongen JL, Wood CG, Liao S, Kozlowski JM, Lee C. Epidermal growth factor receptor activation in androgen-independent but not androgen-stimulated growth of human prostatic carcinoma cells. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:855–861. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Torring N, Dagnaes-Hansen F, Sorensen BS, Nexo E, Hynes NE. ErbB1 and prostate cancer: ErbB1 activity is essential for androgen-induced proliferation and protection from the apoptotic effects of LY294002. Prostate. 2003;56:142–149. doi: 10.1002/pros.10245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sirotnak FM, Zakowski MF, Miller VA, Scher HI, Kris MG. Efficacy of cytotoxic agents against human tumor xenografts is markedly enhanced by coadministration of ZD1839 (Iressa), an inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine kinase. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:4885–4892. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sirotnak FM, She Y, Lee F, Chen J, Scher HI. Studies with CWR22 xenografts in nude mice suggest that ZD1839 may have a role in the treatment of both androgen-dependent and androgen-independent human prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:3870–3876. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Agus DB, Akita RW, Fox WD, Lewis GD, Higgins B, Pisacane PI, Lofgren JA, Tindell C, Evans DP, Maiese K, Scher HI, Sliwkowski MX. Targeting ligand-activated ErbB2 signaling inhibits breast and prostate tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2002;2:127–137. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00097-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Scher HI, Sarkis A, Reuter V, Cohen D, Netto G, Petrylak D, Lianes P, Fuks Z, Mendelsohn J, Cordon-Cardo C. Changing pattern of expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor alpha in the progression of prostatic neoplasms. Clin Cancer Res. 1995;1:545–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Di Lorenzo G, Tortora G, D'Armiento FP, De Rosa G, Staibano S, Autorino R, D'Armiento M, De Laurentiis M, De Placido S, Catalano G, Bianco AR, Ciardiello F. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor correlates with disease relapse and progression to androgen-independence in human prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:3438–3444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hernes E, Fossa SD, Berner A, Otnes B, Nesland JM. Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor family in prostate carcinoma before and during androgen-independence. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:449–454. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Gebhardt F, Zanker KS, Brandt B. Modulation of epidermal growth factor receptor gene transcription by a polymorphic dinucleotide repeat in intron 1. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:13176–13180. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.19.13176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Liu W, Innocenti F, Chen P, Das S, Cook EH, Jr, Ratain MJ. Interethnic difference in the allelic distribution of human epidermal growth factor receptor intron 1 polymorphism. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:1009–1012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chi DD, Hing AV, Helms C, Steinbrueck T, Mishra SK, Donis-Keller H. Two chromosome 7 dinucleotide repeat polymer-phisms at gene loci epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and pro alpha 2 (I) collagen (COL1A2) Hum Mol Genet. 1992;1:135. doi: 10.1093/hmg/1.2.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Buerger H, Gebhardt F, Schmidt H, Beckmann A, Hutmacher K, Simon R, Lelle R, Boecker W, Brandt B. Length and loss of hetero-zygosity of an intron 1 polymorphic sequence of egfr is related to cytogenetic alterations and epithelial growth factor receptor expression. Cancer Res. 2000;60:854–857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Shuch B, Mikhail M, Satagopan J, Lee P, Yee H, Chang C, Cordon-Cardo C, Taneja SS, Osman I. Racial disparity of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4725–4729. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Moul JW, Maygarden SJ, Ware JL, Mohler JL, Maher PD, Schenkman NS, Ho CK. Cathepsin D and epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry does not predict recurrence of prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1996;155:982–985. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Douglas DA, Zhong H, Ro JY, Oddoux C, Berger AD, Pincus MR, Satagopan JM, Gerald WL, Scher HI, Lee P, Osman I. Novel mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor in localized prostate cancer. Front Biosci. 2006;11:2518–2525. doi: 10.2741/1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Huusko P, Ponciano-Jackson D, Wolf M, Kiefer JA, Azorsa DO, Tuzmen S, Weaver D, Robbins C, Moses T, Allinen M, Hautaniemi S, Chen Y, Elkahloun A, Basik M, Bova GS, Bubendorf L, Lugli A, Sauter G, Schleutker J, Ozcelik H, Elowe S, Pawson T, Trent JM, Carpten JD, Kallioniemi OP, Mousses S. Nonsense-mediated decay microarray analysis identifies mutations of EPHB2 in human prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2004;36:979–983. doi: 10.1038/ng1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gibbs M, Stanford JL, McIndoe RA, Jarvik GP, Kolb S, Goode EL, Chakrabarti L, Schuster EF, Buckley VA, Miller EL, Brandzel S, Li S, Hood L, Ostrander EA. Evidence for a rare prostate cancer-susceptibility locus at chromosome 1p36. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:776–787. doi: 10.1086/302287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Matsui H, Suzuki K, Ohtake N, Nakata S, Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Inoue I. Genomewide linkage analysis of familial prostate cancer in the Japanese population. J Hum Genet. 2004;49:9–15. doi: 10.1007/s10038-003-0099-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Brown WM, Lange EM, Chen H, Zheng SL, Chang B, Wiley KE, Isaacs SD, Walsh PC, Isaacs WB, Xu J, Cooney KA. Hereditary prostate cancer in African American families: linkage analysis using markers that map to five candidate susceptibility loci. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:510–514. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kittles RA, Baffoe-Bonnie AB, Moses TY, Robbins CM, Ahaghotu C, Huusko P, Pettaway C, Vijayakumar S, Bennett J, Hoke G, Mason T, Weinrich S, Trent JM, Collins FS, Mousses S, Bailey-Wilson J, Furbert-Harris P, Dunston G, Powell IJ, Carpten JD. A common nonsense mutation in EphB2 is associated with prostate cancer risk in African American men with a positive family history. J Med Genet. 2006;43:507–511. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.035790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.deVere White RW, Deitch AD, Jackson AG, Gandour-Edwards R, Marshalleck J, Soares SE, Toscano SN, Lunetta JM, Stewart SL. Racial differences in clinically localized prostate cancers of black and white men. J Urol. 1998;159:1979–1982. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63216-6. discussion 1982–1973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Pietsch EC, Humbey O, Murphy ME. Polymorphisms in the p53 pathway. Oncogene. 2006;25:1602–1611. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Haupt Y, Maya R, Kazaz A, Oren M. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature. 1997;387:296–299. doi: 10.1038/387296a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kubbutat MH, Jones SN, Vousden KH. Regulation of p53 stability by Mdm2. Nature. 1997;387:299–303. doi: 10.1038/387299a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bond GL, Hu W, Levine AJ. MDM2 is a central node in the p53 pathway: 12 years and counting. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2005;5:3–8. doi: 10.2174/1568009053332627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Osman I, Drobnjak M, Fazzari M, Ferrara J, Scher HI, Cordon-Cardo C. Inactivation of the p53 pathway in prostate cancer: impact on tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:2082–2088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Leite KR, Franco MF, Srougi M, Nesrallah LJ, Nesrallah A, Bevilacqua RG, Darini E, Carvalho CM, Meirelles MI, Santana I, Camara-Lopes LH. Abnormal expression of MDM2 in prostate carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2001;14:428–436. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Khor LY, Desilvio M, Al-Saleem T, Hammond ME, Grignon DJ, Sause W, Pilepich M, Okunieff P, Sandler H, Pollack A. MDM2 as a predictor of prostate carcinoma outcome: an analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 8610. Cancer. 2005;104:962–967. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bianco R, Caputo R, Damiano V, De Placido S, Ficorella C, Agrawal S, Bianco AR, Ciardiello F, Tortora G. Combined targeting of epidermal growth factor receptor and MDM2 by gefitinib and antisense MDM2 cooperatively inhibit hormone-independent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:4858–4864. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Wang H, Yu D, Agrawal S, Zhang R. Experimental therapy of human prostate cancer by inhibiting MDM2 expression with novel mixed-backbone antisense oligonucleo-tides: in vitro and in vivo activities and mechanisms. Prostate. 2003;54:194–205. doi: 10.1002/pros.10187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zhang Z, Li M, Wang H, Agrawal S, Zhang R. Antisense therapy targeting MDM2 oncogene in prostate cancer: Effects on proliferation, apoptosis, multiple gene expression, and chemotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:11636–11641. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934692100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bond GL, Menin C, Bertorelle R, Alhopuro P, Aaltonen LA, Levine AJ. MDM2 SNP309 accelerates colorectal tumour formation in women. J Med Genet. 2006;43:950–952. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lind H, Zienolddiny S, Ekstrom PO, Skaug V, Haugen A. Association of a functional polymorphism in the promoter of the MDM2 gene with risk of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:718–721. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Menin C, Scaini MC, De Salvo GL, Biscuola M, Quaggio M, Esposito G, Belluco C, Montagna M, Agata S, D'Andrea E, Nitti D, Amadori A, Bertorelle R. Association between MDM2-SNP309 and age at colorectal cancer diagnosis according to p53 mutation status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:285–288. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Alhopuro P, Ylisaukko-Oja SK, Koskinen WJ, Bono P, Arola J, Jarvinen HJ, Mecklin JP, Atula T, Kontio R, Makitie AA, Suominen S, Leivo I, Vahteristo P, Aaltonen LM, Aaltonen LA. The MDM2 promoter polymorphism SNP309T–>G and the risk of uterine leiomyosarcoma, colorectal cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Med Genet. 2005;42:694–698. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.031260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Yarden RI, Friedman E, Metsuyanim S, Olender T, Ben-Asher E, Papa MZ. MDM2 SNP309 accelerates breast and ovarian carcinogenesis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers of Jewish-Ashkenazi descent. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:497–504. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9797-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wang G, Firoz EF, Rose A, Blochin E, Christos P, Pollens D, Mazumdar M, Gerald W, Oddoux C, Lee P, Osman I. MDM2 Expression and Regulation in Prostate Cancer Racial Disparity. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2009;2:353–360. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zeigler-Johnson CM, Walker AH, Mancke B, Spangler E, Jalloh M, McBride S, Deitz A, Malkowicz SB, Ofori-Adjei D, Gueye SM, Rebbeck TR. Ethnic differences in the frequency of prostate cancer susceptibility alleles at SRD5A2 and CYP3A4. Hum Hered. 2002;54:13–21. doi: 10.1159/000066695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Miller DC, Zheng SL, Dunn RL, Sarma AV, Montie JE, Lange EM, Meyers DA, Xu J, Cooney KA. Germ-line mutations of the macrophage scavenger receptor 1 gene: association with prostate cancer risk in African-American men. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3486–3489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Cunningham GR, Ashton CM, Annegers JF, Souchek J, Klima M, Miles B. Familial aggregation of prostate cancer in African-Americans and white Americans. Prostate. 2003;56:256–262. doi: 10.1002/pros.10252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Oakley-Girvan I, Feldman D, Eccleshall TR, Gallagher RP, Wu AH, Kolonel LN, Halpern J, Balise RR, West DW, Paffenbarger RS., Jr and Whittemore AS. Risk of early-onset prostate cancer in relation to germ line polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1325–1330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Monroe KR, Yu MC, Kolonel LN, Coetzee GA, Wilkens LR, Ross RK, Henderson BE. Evidence of an X-linked or recessive genetic component to prostate cancer risk. Nat Med. 1995;1:827–829. doi: 10.1038/nm0895-827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Bastacky SI, Wojno KJ, Walsh PC, Carmichael MJ, Epstein JI. Pathological features of hereditary prostate cancer. J Urol. 1995;153:987–992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Mirchandani D, Zheng J, Miller GJ, Ghosh AK, Shibata DK, Cote RJ, Roy-Burman P. Heterogeneity in intratumor distribution of p53 mutations in human prostate cancer. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:92–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Qian J, Bostwick DG, Takahashi S, Borell TJ, Herath JF, Lieber MM, Jenkins RB. Chromosomal anomalies in prostatic intraepi-thelial neoplasia and carcinoma detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Res. 1995;55:5408–5414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Sakr WA, Grignon DJ, Crissman JD, Heilbrun LK, Cassin BJ, Pontes JJ, Haas GP. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma between the ages of 20–69: an autopsy study of 249 cases. In Vivo. 1994;8:439–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rebbeck TR. Genetics, disparities, and prostate cancer. LDI Issue Brief. 2005;10:1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Xu J, Zheng SL, Hawkins GA, Faith DA, Kelly B, Isaacs SD, Wiley KE, Chang B, Ewing CM, Bujnovszky P, Carpten JD, Bleecker ER, Walsh PC, Trent JM, Meyers DA, Isaacs WB. Linkage and association studies of prostate cancer susceptibility: evidence for linkage at 8p22–23. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:341–350. doi: 10.1086/321967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Gibbs M, Stanford JL, Jarvik GP, Janer M, Badzioch M, Peters MA, Goode EL, Kolb S, Chakrabarti L, Shook M, Basom R, Ostrander EA, Hood L. A genomic scan of families with prostate cancer identifies multiple regions of interest. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67:100–109. doi: 10.1086/302969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Emmert-Buck MR, Vocke CD, Pozzatti RO, Duray PH, Jennings SB, Florence CD, Zhuang Z, Bostwick DG, Liotta LA, Linehan WM. Allelic loss on chromosome 8p12–21 in microdis-sected prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer Res. 1995;55:2959–2962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Vocke CD, Pozzatti RO, Bostwick DG, Florence CD, Jennings SB, Strup SE, Duray PH, Liotta LA, Emmert-Buck MR, Linehan WM. Analysis of 99 microdissected prostate carcinomas reveals a high frequency of allelic loss on chromosome 8p12–21. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2411–2416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Zitzelsberger H, Engert D, Walch A, Kulka U, Aubele M, Hofler H, Bauchinger M, Werner M. Chromosomal changes during development and progression of prostate adenocarcinomas. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:202–208. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Verma RS, Manikal M, Conte RA, Godec CJ. Chromosomal basis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Invest. 1999;17:441–447. doi: 10.3109/07357909909021436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Bookstein R. Tumor suppressor genes in prostatic oncogenesis. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1994;19:217–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Kalapurakal JA, Jacob AN, Kim PY, Najjar DD, Hsieh YC, Ginsberg P, Daskal I, Asbell SO, Kandpal RP. Racial differences in prostate cancer related to loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 8p12–23. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:835–840. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Washburn JG, Wojno KJ, Dey J, Powell IJ, Macoska JA. 8pter-p23 deletion is associated with racial differences in prostate cancer outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:4647–4652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Morikawa A, Varma V, Gillespie TW, Lyles RH, Goodman M, Bostick RM, Mandel JS, Zhou W. Counting alleles in single lesions of prostate tumors from ethnically diverse patients. Prostate. 2008;68:231–240. doi: 10.1002/pros.20693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Denli AM, Tops BB, Plasterk RH, Ketting RF, Hannon GJ. Processing of primary microRNAs by the Microprocessor complex. Nature. 2004;432:231–235. doi: 10.1038/nature03049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Calin GA, Sevignani C, Dumitru CD, Hyslop T, Noch E, Yendamuri S, Shimizu M, Rattan S, Bullrich F, Negrini M, Croce CM. Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:2999–3004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307323101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA, Downing JR, Jacks T, Horvitz HR, Golub TR. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834–838. doi: 10.1038/nature03702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Liu CG, Veronese A, Spizzo R, Sabbioni S, Magri E, Pedriali M, Fabbri M, Campiglio M, Menard S, Palazzo JP, Rosenberg A, Musiani P, Volinia S, Nenci I, Calin GA, Querzoli P, Negrini M, Croce CM. MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7065–7070. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Liu CG, Calin GA, Meloon B, Gamliel N, Sevignani C, Ferracin M, Dumitru CD, Shimizu M, Zupo S, Dono M, Alder H, Bullrich F, Negrini M, Croce CM. An oligonucleotide microchip for genome-wide microRNA profiling in human and mouse tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:9740–9744. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403293101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Akao Y, Nakagawa Y, Naoe T. MicroRNAs 143 and 145 are possible common onco-microRNAs in human cancers. Oncol Rep. 2006;16:845–850. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Hayashita Y, Osada H, Tatematsu Y, Yamada H, Yanagisawa K, Tomida S, Yatabe Y, Kawahara K, Sekido Y, Takahashi T. A polycistronic microRNA cluster, miR-17–92, is overexpressed in human lung cancers and enhances cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9628–9632. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.He L, Thomson JM, Hemann MT, Hernando-Monge E, Mu D, Goodson S, Powers S, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW, Hannon GJ, Hammond SM. A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature. 2005;435:828–833. doi: 10.1038/nature03552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Voorhoeve PM, le Sage C, Schrier M, Gillis AJ, Stoop H, Nagel R, Liu YP, van Duijse J, Drost J, Griekspoor A, Zlotorynski E, Yabuta N, De Vita G, Nojima H, Looijenga LH, Agami R. A genetic screen implicates miRNA-372 and miRNA-373 as oncogenes in testicular germ cell tumors. Cell. 2006;124:1169–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Si ML, Zhu S, Wu H, Lu Z, Wu F, Mo YY. miR-21-mediated tumor growth. Oncogene. 2007;26:2799–2803. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Wang T, Zhang X, Obijuru L, Laser J, Aris V, Lee P, Mittal K, Soteropoulos P, Wei JJ. A micro-RNA signature associated with race, tumor size, and target gene activity in human uterine leiomyomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007;46:336–347. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:857–866. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Jean-Gilles J, Satagopan J, Zhou Q, Dash A, Yu J, Lee P, Scher HI, Gerald W, Osman O. Different chromosomal alterations correlate with gene expression in African American (AA) versus Caucasian American (CA) prostate cancer (PC) patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. 2007;25:5000. [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Polascik TJ, Oesterling JE, Partin AW. Prostate specific antigen: a decade of discovery–what we have learned and where we are going. J Urol. 1999;162:293–306. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68543-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Oh J, Colberg JW, Ornstein DK, Johnson ET, Chan D, Virgo KS, Johnson FE. Current followup strategies after radical prostatectomy: a survey of American Urological Association urologists. J Urol. 1999;161:520–523. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61939-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Zeliadt SB, Penson DF, Albertsen PC, Concato J, Etzioni RD. Race independently predicts prostate specific antigen testing frequency following a prostate carcinoma diagnosis. Cancer. 2003;98:496–503. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Abraham N, Wan F, Montagnet C, Wong YN, Armstrong K. Decrease in racial disparities in the staging evaluation for prostate cancer after publication of staging guidelines. J Urol. 2007;178:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.035. discussion 87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Mariotto AB, Etzioni R, Krapcho M, Feuer EJ. Reconstructing PSA testing patterns between black and white men in the US from Medicare claims and the National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2007;109:1877–1886. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Xue WM, Coetzee GA, Ross RK, Irvine R, Kolonel L, Henderson BE, Ingles SA. Genetic determinants of serum prostate-specific antigen levels in healthy men from a multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:575–579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Deka R, Guangyun S, Wiest J, Smelser D, Chunhua S, Zhong Y, Chakraborty R. Patterns of instability of expanded CAG repeats at the ERDA1 locus in general populations. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:192–198. doi: 10.1086/302453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Xu J, Zheng SL, Komiya A, Mychaleckyj JC, Isaacs SD, Hu JJ, Sterling D, Lange EM, Hawkins GA, Turner A, Ewing CM, Faith DA, Johnson JR, Suzuki H, Bujnovszky P, Wiley KE, DeMarzo AM, Bova GS, Chang B, Hall MC, McCullough DL, Partin AW, Kassabian VS, Carpten JD, Bailey-Wilson JE, Trent JM, Ohar J, Bleecker ER, Walsh PC, Isaacs WB, Meyers DA. Germline mutations and sequence variants of the macrophage scavenger receptor 1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2002;32:321–325. doi: 10.1038/ng994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Xu J, Zheng SL, Komiya A, Mychaleckyj JC, Isaacs SD, Chang B, Turner AR, Ewing CM, Wiley KE, Hawkins GA, Bleecker ER, Walsh PC, Meyers DA, Isaacs WB. Common sequence variants of the macrophage scavenger receptor 1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:208–212. doi: 10.1086/345802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Translational Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES