A few years after leaving the navy, a 50-year-old Veteran* presents to a new family physician with chronic knee and back pain. He is seeking a new physician for opioid and benzodiazepine refills, referrals for ongoing acupuncture and massage therapy, and completion of Veteran Affairs Canada (VAC) disability claim forms for his back. He was medically released at the rank of Petty Officer owing to knee impairment secondary to a fracture sustained aboard ship. He twice strained his back on deployments, but did not develop chronic low back pain until after leaving the Canadian Forces (CF). On release from the CF he completed comprehensive medical, psychosocial, and vocational rehabilitation in the VAC Rehabilitation Program for disability related to his knee impairment. Lately, chronic low back pain prevents him from continuing civilian employment and enjoying life.
The physician takes the Veteran’s history, performs appropriate physical examination and diagnostic investigations, and obtains previous medical records. The physician diagnoses chronic mechanical low back pain and knee osteoarthritis, and is concerned about the Veteran’s mental health. When the family physician tries to explore the mental health differential diagnosis, the Veteran initially becomes upset, but he responds to motivational interviewing. The physician books follow-up appointments to develop a therapeutic relationship with the Veteran and completes the VAC forms. With consent, the physician also sends a referral letter to the VAC district office, outlining the Veteran’s health issues. The client is found to be eligible to re-enter the VAC Rehabilitation Program to manage disability related to his back pain. The Veteran is ultimately able to withdraw from chronic opiate and benzodiazepine medications and optimize his participation in life.
Family physicians play key roles in the management of Veterans with disabilities. One in 10 Canadians report activity limitation related to pain or discomfort.1 Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a leading cause of medical discharge from military service.2 Canadian military and Royal Canadian Mounted Police Veterans of all ages receive disability benefits as a result of MSDs, and MSDs account for a substantial proportion of VAC’s $3 billion budget. Veterans with entitlements for service-related MSDs often have comorbid chronic pain and mental health conditions, which complicates care. This paper reviews a family medicine approach to the management of Veteran’s disabilities stemming from MSD-related chronic pain.
Disability
Disability is used loosely in family medicine literature. Effectively helping a person with disability toward normalized function at home and work requires shifting from a disease paradigm to a disability and residual-ability paradigm. A person’s physical or mental health problem results in impairment in biologic function. Not all persons with impairments are disabled. Disability is the effect of impairments on daily functioning within a social and environmental context.3–6 Musculoskeletal disorders are not in themselves disabilities, but a person with an MSD is disabled when the condition has functional effects as a result of the impairment and psychological, social, or environmental barriers.7,8
Viewing disability this way and considering that health is “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”9 leads to 3 key elements in the management of disabilities:
Optimize treatment of the physical or mental impairment.
Assist with mental adaptation and coping with the disability.
Reduce external social and physical environmental barriers.
Managing disability related to chronic pain
Box 110,11 suggests an approach to the management of disability related to chronic pain. Thorough assessment is fundamental. Both intensity of pain experience and participation status define disability in chronic pain.8 There is strong evidence that early, comprehensive rehabilitation for low back pain and other MSDs is preferred. 10 The family physician works with a team where necessary to provide reassurance, cognitive behavioural therapy, psychoeducation, barrier reduction, and activity resumption.12 It is important to resolve contradictions stemming from competing interests of multiple actors (employer, insurer, health care provider, and family members). The effectiveness of this approach has been shown in several studies and reviews.2,10,13
Box 1. Approach to management of disability related to MSDs with chronic pain.
These elements can be concurrent:
|
Interdisciplinary collaboration
Family physicians are unlikely to accomplish all of this alone, so collaboration with specialized rehabilitation providers is advised, particularly in the case of complex or well-established disabilities.2,14 Although family physicians provide case management, they share that role with specialized disability case managers. Family physicians can promote development of local disability management teams. Participation in such teams can be satisfying work for family physicians.
Mental health comorbidity
Mental health conditions, especially depression, often are comorbid with MSDs and chronic pain–related disability.15,16 Detection and treatment might improve outcomes.17 Research into optimum approaches continues; however, both medication and psychological therapies have roles to play. Psychological treatments might diminish or control negative mood, disability, and in some cases chronic pain.12,18 A nonconfrontational explanation of the multifaceted nature of MSD pain often negates the thought that “The doctor thinks it’s all in my head.” Explaining that combined physical and psychological treatment is more likely to help these difficult problems makes the patient more receptive.
Military context
The military context of Veterans with service-related disabilities is important. Young, healthy soldiers in the prime of fitness who become disabled after illness or injury can experience a powerful sense of loss of identity and health, leading to feeling “broken” (common military slang). When they transition to civilian life, Veterans can no longer access military health services, fending for themselves in the civilian health care system. Loss of military identity includes loss of military “family” and disorientation in the unfamiliar civilian culture. Many report difficulty finding a family physician, particularly when they move their families to new communities. Veterans might have strong beliefs that military service is the root of disorders arising later in life. These context issues can present social and physical environmental barriers that define Veterans’ disabilities when they have chronic health problems.
Management of chronic non-malignant pain
Management of chronic pain requires a comprehensive treatment plan fully addressing disability. Nonpharmacologic approaches are essential, variably including collaborative physical therapies, education, mental health care, and social support2,12 (Box 110,11). The patient needs to know that analgesics and adjunctive medication are used to control pain to facilitate other interventions that reduce disability so that he or she can resume normal activities and that pain might never be completely eliminated.
Box 219,20 suggests an approach if chronic opioid therapy (COT) is considered. Chronic opioid therapy in non-malignant pain can promote disability and be complicated by side effects, tolerance, addiction, and illicit behaviour including diversion.21 The evidence for a treatment benefit of opioids in disability related to chronic pain is unclear.22 Long-acting opioids might not protect against misuse.21 Although it is important to try to screen patients before offering COT, there is no generally accepted screening tool.23 The fear-avoidance model of chronic pain might explain why some people get into a spiral of increasing avoidance and persistent dysfunction24 on COT. Guidelines recommend documenting informed, signed consent for COT.19 When COT fails to help restore ability, consider substitution or withdrawal.
Box 2. Approach to COT in chronic non-malignant pain.
|
Department of National Defence
Ill and injured CF members receive rehabilitation to restore members to operational readiness and, whenever possible, to minimize development of disabilities. The CF Rehabilitation Program is affiliated with designated civilian centres of rehabilitation excellence. Casualty Management Teams assist in coordinating regional multidisciplinary rehabilitation. The Department of National Defence and VAC work together to integrate services for members who transition to civilian life with service-related disabilities.
Resources
Resources for physicians
World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health checklist: www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfchecklist.pdf
Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) telephone: 866 522–2122 (English) or 866 522–2022 (French)
VAC website: www.vac-acc.gc.ca; click on “Providers and Professionals”
Resources for Veterans
VAC telephone: 866 522–2122 (English) or 866 522–2022 (French)
VAC website: www.vac.gc.ca; click on “Services and Benefits”
Veterans Affairs Canada
Eligible Veterans with service-related MSDs resulting in disabilities affecting reestablishment in civilian life can access services through VAC, including personalized case management, financial benefits, assistance with career transition, and comprehensive rehabilitation services like expedited referral to psychologists, occupational therapists, social workers, vocational rehabilitation professionals, and pain management programs.25 For clients with substance use problems, specialized assessment and treatment services are available. Area counselors in VAC district offices provide case management and welcome family physician collaboration.
Adverse drug utilization
Some patients misuse opioid therapy. Like other paying agencies, VAC is obliged to use prescription screening procedures to identify clients with adverse medication use profiles. When claims fall outside accepted parameters, those cases are referred to the Adverse Drug Utilization Evaluation committee for resolution by a team (including the client, the client’s physician, and VAC regional and district staff) in a manner beneficial to the client.
Family physicians and VAC
Veterans Affairs Canada welcomes family physician collaboration and relies on family physicians to provide necessary documentation to assist in providing services to Veterans. Family physicians can encourage Veterans to contact VAC and can send referral letters to the local VAC district office.
Veteran Health Files is a quarterly series in Canadian Family Physician coordinated by Veterans Affairs Canada. The series explores situations experienced by family physicians caring for Veterans of military service. For further information on this series, contact Dr Jim Thompson, Veterans Affairs Canada Head Office, Charlottetown, PEI; e-mail research-recherche@vac-acc.gc.ca
BOTTOM LINE
Managing disability requires optimizing treatment of the impairment, assisting mental adaptation, and reducing external social and physical environmental barriers.
The goal in managing disability is to assist patients in achieving optimal quality of life by restoring health, independence, and participation in life.
Family physicians have key roles in collaborative disability case management with Veterans Affairs Canada.
POINTS SAILLANTS
La prise en charge d’une invalidité nécessite l’optimisation du traitement de la déficience, le soutien à l’adaptation mentale et la réduction des barrières environnementales sociales et physiques externes.
La prise en charge d’une invalidité a pour but d’aider le patient à atteindre une qualité de vie optimale en rétablissant sa santé, son indépendance et sa participation à la vie.
Les médecins de famille jouent des rôles clés dans la gestion concertée des cas par Anciens Combattants Canada.
Footnotes
The case presented is fictitious.
La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca.
Competing interests
None declared
The opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Veterans Affairs Canada or the Department of National Defence and Canadian Forces.
References
- 1.Statistics Canada . A profile of disability in Canada, 2001. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada, Housing Family and Social Statistics Division; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gatchel RJ, McGeary DD, Peterson A, Moore M, LeRoy K, Isler WC, et al. Preliminary findings of a randomized controlled trial of an interdisciplinary military pain program. Mil Med. 2009;174(3):270–7. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-03-1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nagi S. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB, editor. Sociology and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1965. pp. 100–13. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nagi S. Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In: Pope A, Tarlov A, editors. Disability in America: towards a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991. pp. 309–27. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Field MJ, Jette AM.The future of disability in America. Committee on Disability in America Board on Health Sciences Policy Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2007. Available from: http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11898 Accessed 2009 Sep 15. [Google Scholar]
- 6.World Health Organization International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Assembly Resolution 54.21 Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2001. Available from: www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ Accessed 2008 Oct 27. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vézina N, Bari R, Gagnon D, et al. Disability prevention: the new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2001;9(7):351–60. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Loisel P. Developing a new paradigm: work disability prevention. Paper presented at: International Congress on Occupational Health; 2009 Mar 22–27; Cape Town, South Africa. [Google Scholar]
- 9.World Health Organization Definition of health Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 1948. Available from: www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html Accessed 2009 Sep 18. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Waddell G, Burton AK, Kendall NA.Vocational rehabilitation. What works, for whom, and when? London, Engl: The Stationery Office; 2008. Available from: www.workingforhealth.gov.uk/documents/vocational-rehabilitation.pdf Accessed 2009 Sep 15. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Taiwo OA, Cantley L. Impairment and disability evaluation: the role of the family physician. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(12):1689–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sullivan MJ, Stanish WD. Psychologically based occupational rehabilitation: The Pain-Disability Prevention Program. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(2):97–104. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200303000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Guzmán J, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. BMJ. 2001;322(7301):1511–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dobscha SK, Corson K, Perrin NA, Hanson GC, Ruth MS, Leibowitz RQ, et al. Collaborative care for chronic pain in primary care, a cluster randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;301(12):1242–52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Scott KM, Von Korff M, Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bromet E, Fayyad J, et al. Mental-physical co-morbidity and its relationship with disability: results from the World Mental Health Surveys Psychol Med 200839133–43. Epub 2008 Mar 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sherbourne CD, Asch SM, Shugarman LR, Goebel JR, Lanto AB, Rubenstein LV, et al. Early identification of co-occurring pain, depression and anxiety J Gen Intern Med 2009245620–5. Epub 2009 Mar 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Katon W, Lin EH, Kroenke K. The association of depression and anxiety with medical symptom burden in patients with chronic medical illness. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007;29(2):147–55. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eccleston C, Williams AC, Morley S.Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20092CD007407 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chou R, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, Miaskowski C, Passik SD, Portenoy RK. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: prediction and identification of aberrant drug-related behaviors: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society and American Academy of Pain Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Pain. 2009;10(2):131–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta . Management of chronic nonmalignant pain. CPSA guideline. Edmonton, AB: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sproule B, Brands B, Li S, Catz-Biro L.Changing patterns in opioid addiction. Characterizing users of oxycodone and other opioids Can Fam Physician 20095568–9. e1–5. Available from: www.cfp.ca/cgi/reprint/55/1/68 Accessed 2009 Sep 18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Furlan AD, Sandoval JA, Mailis-Gagnon A, Tunks E. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects. CMAJ. 2006;174(11):1589–94. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gianutsos LP, Safranek S, Huber T. Clinical inquiries: is there a well-tested tool to detect drug-seeking behaviours in chronic pain patients? J Fam Pract. 2008;57(9):609–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain. 1995;62(3):363–72. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00279-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pranger T, Murphy K, Thompson JM.Shaken world. Coping with transition to civilian life Can Fam Physician 200955159–61., CFPlus (Fr). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]