Skip to main content
World Journal of Gastroenterology logoLink to World Journal of Gastroenterology
letter
. 2009 Nov 14;15(42):5371. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5371

Hepatocellular carcinoma and evidence-based surgery

Alain Braillon 1
PMCID: PMC2776869  PMID: 19908350

Abstract

Transplantation cannot be considered the most important therapeutic procedure for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In France, no more than 2% of patients with HCC undergo a transplantation. Randomized controlled trial must assess the benefit to risk ratio of various potentially “curative” treatment procedures (transplantation, resection, radio-frequency ablation).

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Evidence based medicine

TO THE EDITOR

Rampone et al[1] stated that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still remains a considerable challenge for surgeons and that transplantation is the most important therapeutic procedure. However, facts seem different for an evidence-based medicine adept[2].

There is a challenge for the patient because yet no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has assessed the benefit to risk ratio of various potentially “curative” treatment procedures (transplantation, resection, radio-frequency ablation). RCT is feasible. Benefit of chemoembolization to patients with unresectable HCC and sorafenib in a palliative indication are evidence-based from RCT. Recruiting is not an issue since HCC is the fifth most common cause of cancer.

Transplantation cannot be considered the most important therapeutic approach. In France with 66 000 000 inhabitants, 7500 inhabitants die of HCC per year. In 2007, 1061 transplantations were performed for various conditions and 6% of the candidates died while on waiting list due to the shortage of organs[3]. In Europe, 15% of transplantations are performed for HCC[4]. Therefore, in France, no more than 2% of patients with HCC undergo a transplantation. Nevertheless, more than one out of four exceeds the Milan criteria, a situation which does not improve the results[4]. Again, data are missing, and the national agency in charge of transplantation does not publish survival after transplantation according to indications. However, they exist.

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Salvatore Gruttadauria, MD, Assistant Professor, Abdominal Transplant Surgery, ISMETT, Via E. Tricomi, 190127 Palermo, Italy

S- Editor Tian L L- Editor Wang XL E- Editor Lin YP

References

  • 1.Rampone B, Schiavone B, Martino A, Viviano C, Confuorto G. Current management strategy of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3210–3216. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Braillon A, Nguyen-Khac E. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a pledge for evidence-based medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121:e7; author reply e11–e17; author reply e12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Agence de Biomédecine. Rapport annuel 2007. Available from: URL: http://www.agence-biomedecine.fr/uploads/document/rapp-synth2007.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Conférence de consensus. Indications de la transplantation hépatique. 19 et 20 janvier 2005. Available from: URL: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/Transplantation_hepatique_2005_court.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2009. [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES