Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1962 Feb;83(2):324–329. doi: 10.1128/jb.83.2.324-329.1962

CHARACTERISTICS OF BRUCELLAPHAGE1

C R McDuff a, Lois M Jones a, J B Wilson a
PMCID: PMC277732  PMID: 16561929

Abstract

McDuff, C. R. (University of Wisconsin, Madison), Lois M. Jones, and J. B. Wilson. Characteristics of brucellaphage. J. Bacteriol. 83:324–329. 1962.—Methods of characterizing phage have been applied to a brucellaphage of Russian origin grown on its propagating strain, Brucella abortus R 19. Phage can be propagated by single plaque transfer. Phage titers of about 1010 particles per ml can be obtained by propagation on a young culture of R 19 in Albimi broth on a shaker at 37 C. After lyophilization, phage retains its activity during storage for at least 20 months at 4 C. Phage is stable in broth at pH values from 6 to 8 for 24 hr at 37 C. Some loss in activity results from heating for 1 hr at 60 C. All activity is lost in the presence of 10% chloroform. It has a slow adsorption rate (K = 3.6 × 10−11 ml/min), a latent period of 100 min, and a burst size of 121 particles. Electron micrographs indicate that the phage is approximately 65 mμ in diameter, polygonal in shape, with a short tail.

Full text

PDF
324

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CARRERE L., ROUX J., MANDIN J. Obtention de souches lysogènes de Corynebacterium parvum et de Brucella melitensis. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1956;150(8-9):1599–1600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. JONES L. M. Comparison of phage typing with standard methods of species differentiation in brucellae. Bull World Health Organ. 1960;23:130–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KAESBERG P., SETO J. T., WILSON J. B. Electron microscopy and serology of staphylococcus phages. J Bacteriol. 1956 Dec;72(6):847–850. doi: 10.1128/jb.72.6.847-850.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KESSEL R. W., ARONSON M., BRAUN W. Effects of brucellaphage on extracellular and intracellular Brucella abortus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1960 Dec;105:447–450. doi: 10.3181/00379727-105-26136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PARNAS J., FELTYNOWSKI A., BULIKOWSKI W. Anti-brucella phage. Nature. 1958 Dec 6;182(4649):1610–1611. doi: 10.1038/1821610a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stinebring W. R., Braun W. BRUCELLAPHAGE. J Bacteriol. 1959 Nov;78(5):736–737. doi: 10.1128/jb.78.5.736-737.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. WAHL R., BLUM-EMERIQUE L. Les bacteries semi-résistantes au bactériophage I. Techniques; souches et phage utilisés. lyse sur milieu gélosé. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1952 Jan;82(1):29–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WILLIAMS R. C., FRASER D. Morphology of the seven T-bacteriophages. J Bacteriol. 1953 Oct;66(4):458–464. doi: 10.1128/jb.66.4.458-464.1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. van DRIMMELEN G. Bacteriophage typing applied to strains of Brucella organisms. Nature. 1959 Oct 3;184(Suppl 14):1079–1079. doi: 10.1038/1841079a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES