Skip to main content
. 1999 Mar 13;318(7185):706–711. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7185.706

Table 5.

Difference between intervention and control groups in secondary outcomes: symptom control and quality of life at 1 year follow up. Values are means unless stated otherwise*

Detail All patients
Patients with myocardial infarction
Patients with angina
Control (n=267) Intervention (n=235) Difference (95% CI) between intervention and control Control (n=178) Intervention (n=170) Control (n=89) Intervention (n=65)
Chest pain at rest or on exercise
No (%) reporting pain 138 (52) 123 (53)  1% (−8% to 10%)  88 (49) 83 (49) 50 (56) 40 (64)
Interference with activity 2.2 2.4 0.3 (−0.4 to 0.9) 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.8
Severity 2.9 2.8 0.0 (−0.6 to 0.6) 2.7 2.5 3.1 3.5
Shortness of breath at rest or on exercise
No (%) reporting shortness of breath 179 (68) 160 (69)  1% (−7% to 10%) 118 (67) 109 (65) 61 (69) 51 (80)
Interference with activity 2.3 3.1 0.7 (0.1 to 1.4) 2.5 3.3 2.1 2.6
Severity 3.4 3.5 0.1 (−0.4 to 0.7) 3.5 3.5 3.2 3.5
Anxiety
Score on subscale 6.5 7.0 0.5 (−0.3 to 1.3) 6.9 6.7 5.9 7.7
No (%) scoring >10  50 (21)  51 (24)  36 (23) 32 (20) 14 (17) 19 (33)
Depression
Score on subscale 4.5 5.0 0.4 (−0.3 to 1.0) 4.9 4.8 4.0 5.3
No (%) scoring >10 17 (7)  24 (11) 12 (7) 17 (10) 5 (6)  7 (12)
Quality of life
EuroQol score 68.4 66.9 −1.5 (−5.1 to 2.1) 67.9 66.8 69.4 67.1 
*

Values are missing for 2-10 of the 502 subjects (0-2%); percentages are calculated exactly and vary slightly from those calculable with numerators and column denominators shown in table. 

Maximum 10 (visual analogue scale). Hospital anxiety and depression scale. Maximum 100 (visual analogue scale).