Skip to main content
Molecular Vision logoLink to Molecular Vision
. 2007 Jul 9;13:1083–1093.

Minocycline and sulforaphane inhibited lipopolysaccharide-mediated retinal microglial activation

Li-ping Yang 1, Xiu-an Zhu 1, Mark OM Tso 1,2,
PMCID: PMC2779142  PMID: 17653053

Abstract

Purpose

To elucidate the inhibitory effect of minocycline and sulforaphane on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced retinal microglial activation and the mechanisms through which they exerted their inhibitory effects.

Methods

Primary retinal microglial cultures were exposed to LPS with or without minocycline and sulforaphane. The mRNA expression of monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, MCP-3, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, eotaxin, regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) protein, and interleukin (IL)-10 were examined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The mRNA expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and subsequent nitric oxide (NO) production were examined by RT-PCR assay and Griess reagent assay. Protein expression of the p65 subunit of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and p-p38, p-p44/42 and p-JNK mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) were examined by Western blot and immunofluorescent analysis.

Results

Cultured retinal microglial cells were activated following exposure to LPS. The mRNA expression and protein production of eotaxin, RANTES, and IL-10 and the mRNA expression of iNOS and subsequent NO production were upregulated. The protein expression of p-p38, p-JNK, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB were also upregulated. However, the protein expression of p-p44/42 was not significantly changed. Pretreatment with minocycline or sulforaphane for 1 h before LPS administration inhibited LPS-induced microglial morphological change and inhibited LPS-induced upregulation of p-p38, but had no effect on the expression of p-p44/42, p-JNK, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB.

Conclusions

Minocycline and sulforaphane inhibited LPS-induced retinal microglial activation, Western blot and immunofluorescent studies showed decreased p-p38 MAPK expression. We suggested that the inhibitory effect of minocycline and sulforaphane was partly through a p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism.

Introduction

Microglia, major glia of the central nervous system (CNS), play a critical role as resident immunocompetent and phagocytic cells in the CNS [1]. Presence of activated microglia was demonstrated in pathological lesions in several neurological and retinal diseases including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease [2], multiple sclerosis [3] and retinal degeneration [4,5]. Although microglia promoted neuronal cell viability and survival by producing growth factor and removing potentially toxic cellular debris [6], there was also evidence that activated microglia was deleterious to neurons through excessive production of inflammatory mediators [5,7]. Microglia and their secretions were major contributors to the enhanced death of neurons in neurodegenerative diseases [8]. Hence, understanding the secretion of microglia and the mechanisms regulating microglial activation is an important step in developing therapeutic strategies that ameliorate symptoms of these diseases. Studies demonstrated that brain-derived microglial cells released immuno-regulatory and neuroprotective agents in interaction with phosphatidyl serine-expressing apoptotic cells [9]. However retinal microglial cells promoted photoreceptor death in vitro [10,11]. Previous studies mainly reported the expression of cytokines/chemokines in brain microglia, which was different from retinal microglia. In this study the cultured retinal microglia was used to study microglial activity. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is used as a tool to simulate a challenge by gram-negative bacteria and to study the microglial activation process.

Minocycline, a semi-synthetic, long-acting tetracycline derivative with good penetration of the blood-brain barrier, has recently been shown to have remarkable neuroprotective properties in models of neurodegeneration [12,13], brain ischemia [14], and multiple sclerosis [15]. Aside from its direct anti-apoptosis effect, this neuroprotective function was also associated with reduced activation of microglia and reduction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β)-converting enzyme (ICE) expression [4,14]. However, the mechanism regulating this inhibition was not clear.

Sulforaphane, a naturally occurring cancer chemopreventive agent found in broccoli [16], has been shown to suppress LPS-mediated expression of iNOS, Cox-2 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in Raw 264.7 macrophage cells [17]. In view of this observation, we hypothesized that sulforaphane may modulate the inflammatory response of activated retinal microglia. Because sulforaphane occurs naturally in the widely consumed vegetable broccoli, this might provide a convenient approach to militate retinal degenerative diseases.

In the present study, we investigated (1) the expression of immunological signaling molecules in cultured retinal microglia with or without LPS treatment; (2) the cellular pathways regulating the LPS-mediated microglial activation processes; and (3) the inhibitory effect of minocycline and sulforaphane on LPS-mediated microglial activation and the mechanisms through which they exert their effects.

Methods

Primary retinal microglial culture

A primary culture of murine retinal microglial cells was prepared from newborn Sprague-Dawley rat retinas according to the technique by Roque and Caldwell [18], with minor modifications. Briefly, the eyes were enucleated and dissected, the retinas were peeled out and incubated in Ca++/Mg++-free Hank's balanced salt solution containing 0.25 mg/ml trypsin and 0.4 mg/ml EDTA at 37 °C for 20 min (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Afterwards, enzyme-treated tissues were dissociated into single cells by gentle pipetting and centrifuged. The dissociated cells were resuspended in DMEM/F-12 (1:1; Invitrogen Corporation, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were seeded at a density of 106 cells/ml in T75 culture flasks (Corning Incorporation, Corning, NY) and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. After 2-3 weeks in vitro, microglial enriched cultures were shaken at 200 rpm on an orbital shaker (Lab-Line Instruments, Melrose Pk, IL) for 4 h and harvested. Microglial cells were reseeded in poly-L-lysine-coated 35 mm culture dishes (Corning Incorporation, Corning, NY).

Immunofluorescent studies

For immunofluorescence, the cultures were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min and rinsed with PBS. The cells were permeabilized with cold (-20 °C) methanol for 10 min. After washing with PBS, they were incubated with blocking buffer (1% bovine serum albumin) for 3 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the cultures were incubated with primary antibodies to microglia (CD11b, Serotec Ltd., Oxford, UK), astrocytes (GFAP, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), Müller cells (CRALBP, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), the p65 subunit of NF-κB (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and the p-p38, p-p44/42, and p-JNK mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) overnight at 4 °C. After rinsing with PBS, the cultures were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies for 45 min and examined by fluorescent microscopy.

Cell exposure experiment

1. Activation of microglia with LPS: Harvested microglial cells were seeded onto 35 mm culture dishes (Corning Incorporation, Corning, NY) and allowed to grow for 2 days. After three washes with PBS, they were incubated with serum-free medium (Invitrogen Corporation, Grand Island, NY) containing 200 ng/ml LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) [19]. The cultures were exposed for 24 h unless otherwise stated.

2. Treatment with pharmaceutical agents: In some experiments, microglial cultures were exposed to minocycline (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), sulforaphane (LKT laboratories, St. Paul, MN), or SB203580 (a specific inhibitor of p38 MAPK, Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h before administering LPS. To determine a dose-response curve for different concentrations of minocycline on the extent of LPS stimulation, the cultures were treated with 2.5 μM, 0.625 μM, 0.16 μM, 0.04 μM, 0.01 μM, and 0.0025 μM minocycline for 1 h and then exposed to LPS. To determine a dose-response curve for different concentrations of sulforaphane on the extent of LPS stimulation, the cultures were treated with 80 μM, 40 μM, 20 μM, 10 μM, 5 μM, 2.5 μM, 1.25 μM, and 0.32 μM sulforaphane for 1 h and then exposed to LPS. Minocycline was dissolved in PBS and diluted with serum-free medium. Sulforaphane and SB203580 were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich) and diluted with serum-free medium before addition to the microtiter plate well. The final concentrations of DMSO were less than 0.1% (by volume).

Nitric oxide and cytokine assays

The production of nitric oxide (NO) was quantified by measuring the released NO metabolites (nitrate and nitrite) with Griess reagent (Sigma-Aldrich). The culture media samples were collected and prepared cell-free by centrifugation. The media (100 μl) were incubated with the same volume of Griess reagent at room temperature for 15 min, and were measured at 570 nm in a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) with an appropriate standard. The Griess reagent assays were repeated four times.

Monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, MCP-3, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, eotaxin, regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) protein, and interleukin (IL)-10 samples were prepared similar to NO samples and determined using rat ELISA Kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to manufacturer's instructions. These experiments were repeated four times.

Total RNA extraction and semi-quantitative reverse transcription

The microglial cells were exposed to LPS with or without minocycline or sulforaphane for 1 h, 4 h, 12 h, or 24 h, and harvested. For PCR assay, the cells were plated in 6-well plates with 2x106 cells per well. Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription (RT) was performed with oligonucleotide primers using Superscript reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Corporation) according to the manufacturer's protocol and PCR was performed afterwards. The primers and annealing temperatures are shown in Table 1. Each PCR product was separated on 2% agarose gel and analyzed with Quantity One 1-D Analysis software (Bio-Rad). The amount of RT-PCR product was corrected with β-actin expression. Experiments with series diluted template amplification for 30-35 cycles were just in the linear range of detection of the examined genes, so we chose to amplify all examined genes for 35 cycles. The level of expression was compared within the time course for one particular gene. In each series of experiments (between 0 to 24 h), the highest expression was arbitrarily normalized to 100%. The PCR experiments were repeated four times from separate cultures.

Table 1. Oligonucleotides used for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Target gene
Sequences (5'-3')
Location
Annealing temperature (°C)
β-Actin
F: CATCCTGCGTCTGGACCT
NT 603-1082
59

R: TCAGGAGGAGCAATGATCTTG


MCP-1
F: ACTGGACCAGAACCAAGTGAGA
NT 342-666
61

R: TGTTGAACCAGGATTCACAGAGA


MCP-3
F: GGTTGAGGAGGCCATAGCATAC
NT 329-705
61

R: CACTGATTCTTGCAATGTCCCT


MIP-1α
F: GAGCTGGAACTAAATGCCTGA
NT 328-653
61

R: TCACCAAACACAGTGTGAGCA


MIP-1β
F: CCTTCTGCGATTCAGTGCTGT
NT 47-256
61

R: CATACTCATTGACCCAGGGCT


Eotaxin
F: GCACGCTGAAAGCCATAGTCT
NT 204-557
61

R: CATCTCCTTCCATGCTCTCTCCT


Rantes
F: CTGCATCCCTCACCGTCATC
NT 17-242
57

R: CACTTCTTCTCTGGGTTGGCA


IL-10
F: AGAAGCTGAAGACCCTCTGGA
NT 385-693
59

R: TGGAGAGAGGTACAAACGAGGT


iNOS
F: GCTCCATGACTCTCAGCACAG
NT3164-3509
57
R: CTCAACCTGCTCCTCACTCAAG

Primers were designed using the Primer Express Program and purchased from AuGCT Biotechnology, Beijing, P. R. China.

Western blot analysis

The microglial cells were exposed to LPS with or without minocycline or sulforaphane for 1/3 h, 1/2 h, 1 h, or 2 h, and harvested. For Western blot assay, the cells were plated in 6-well plates with 2x106 cells per well. Proteins were extracted using protein lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-CL pH 8.0, 0.02% sodium azide, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1% NP-40, 100 μg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]) and the final protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's specifications. Western blot analysis was then performed as previously described [20]. The antibodies to the p65 subunit of NF-κB, to p-p38, p-p44/42 or p-JNK MAPKs (1:1000 dilution in blocking solution) were used for immunodetection. In some cases, an anti-ERK2 MAPK polyclonal antibody was used to assay total (phospho-independent) ERK and served as a control to ensure that equivalent quantities of proteins were used for SDS-PAGE. To evaluate other proteins, the blot was stripped in stripping buffer (62.5 mM Tris-CL pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 100 mM β-mercaptoethanol) for 30 min at 50 °C and re-probed. The western blot experiments were repeated four times from separate cultures.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as the mean±SD. Statistical comparisons were made by single-factor ANOVA. p<0.01 was considered significant.

Results

Characterization of mouse retinal microglial cells

The microglial cells were harvested from 14-day-old primary mixed glial cell cultures (Figure 1A) with a "shaking off" method [18]. After purification, cells developed the characteristic ramified shape of resting microglia with a long single process and a small cell soma (Figure 1B). More than 95% of the purified cells showed a positive reaction for CD11b according to immunofluorescent studies (Figure 2A) and none of the cells showed a positive reaction for GFAP (Figure 2C) or CRALBP (data not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phase-contrast photomicrographs of the cultured retinal microglial cells. A: Mixed cell cultures from newborn Sprague-Dawley rats for 14 days. B: Purified cells cultured for 48 h. Cells developed the characteristic ramified shape with a long single process and a small cell soma (arrow). C: Purified cells stimulated with LPS for 24 h became bigger and rounder, showing an ameboid shape (arrowhead). Pretreatment with minocycline D or sulforaphane E for 1 h before LPS administration partly inhibited LPS-induced microglial morphological change, with some cells sustaining their ramified shape (arrow), but a few cells changing to an ameboid shape (arrowhead). F: Pretreatment with SB203580 for 1 h before LPS administration completely inhibited the LPS-induced microglial morphological change, with almost all cells sustaining their ramified shape (arrow).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Immunofluorescent characterization of the cultured retinal microglial cells. A: The purified cells were reactive to CD11b, a cell-type-specific marker for microglia. B: After LPS stimulation for 24 h, the CD11b-labeled cells became bigger and rounder, developing the characteristic ameboid shape of activated microglia. C: None of the purified cells showed a positive reaction for GFAP.

Minocycline and sulforaphane inhibited lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation

After LPS stimulation for 24 h, the purified microglial cells became bigger and rounder and developed the characteristic ameboid shape of activated microglia (Figure 1C and Figure 2B). Pretreatment with minocycline (Figure 1D) or sulforaphane (Figure 1E) for 1 h before LPS administration partly inhibited the LPS-induced microglial morphological change, with some cells sustaining their ramified shape, but a few cells showed ameboid shape. Pretreatment with SB203580 for 1 h before LPS administration completely inhibited the LPS-induced microglial morphological change (Figure 1F).

Minocycline and sulforaphane inhibited mRNA expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and production of nitric oxide in activated microglial cells

The effect of minocycline or sulforaphane on LPS-induced iNOS mRNA expression and subsequent NO production in microglial cells was investigated. The microglial cells were treated with LPS alone or with various concentrations of minocycline or sulforaphane. LPS induced a significant time-dependent increment of nitrite and nitrate level in the culture media (Figure 3A). The increment of nitrite and nitrate levels became significant after 6 h of LPS treatment, and continued up to 24 h. Minocycline or sulforaphane itself did not affect the basal iNOS mRNA expression and NO production. The LPS-induced nitrite and nitrate increment was significantly suppressed by administration of minocycline or sulforaphane. The maximal and most consistent inhibition was achieved by treatment with 0.01 μM to 0.625 μM minocycline, or 1.25 μM to 10 μM sulforaphane (Figure 3B,C). The higher doses did not reduce NO production, but had toxic effects on cells. Therefore, 0.16 μM minocycline or 5.0 μM sulforaphane were used for following experiments.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of minocycline and sulforaphane on lipopolysaccharide-induced nitrite and nitrate release in cultured retinal microglial cells. A: Release of nitrite and nitrate from cultured retinal microglia with LPS treatment. The increment of nitrite and nitrate levels became significant after 6 h of LPS treatment and continued for up to 24 h. B: Administration of minocycline significantly reduced LPS-induced nitrite and nitrate production in retinal microglial cells. C: Administration of sulforaphane significantly reduced LPS-induced nitrite and nitrate production in retinal microglial cells. Data represented four independent experiments and were expressed as mean±SD. Asterisk indicates p<0.01 is considered significant.

To further examine whether minocycline or sulforaphane inhibited NO production via suppression of iNOS mRNA expression, the effect of minocycline or sulforaphane on iNOS mRNA expression in LPS-stimulated microglia was investigated. RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that cultured microglial cells constitutively expressed very low levels of iNOS mRNA without LPS treatment, but expression was upregulated after exposure to LPS (Figure 4A). LPS-induced iNOS mRNA expression was completely suppressed by treatment with minocycline and was mostly suppressed (70%) by treatment with sulforaphane (Figure 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated the inhibitory effects of minocycline, sulforaphane and SB203580 on lipopolysaccharide-induced mRNA expression of cytokines and inducible nitric oxide synthase in cultured retinal microglial cells. A: The mRNA expression of several cytokines and iNOS in cultured retinal microglial cells with or without LPS administration. The retinal microglial cells constitutively expressed modest mRNA transcripts for MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β without LPS administration, and treatment with LPS induced the upregulation of eotaxin, RANTES, IL-10 and iNOS. However, the expression levels for MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β were little changed. B: Pretreatment with minocycline, sulforaphane or SB203580 for 1 h before LPS administration significantly reduced the LPS-induced upregulation of eotaxin, RANTES, IL-10, and iNOS, but had no significant effect on the expression of MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β.

Minocycline and sulforaphane modulated mRNA expression and protein production of several cytokines in activated microglial cells

The mRNA expression of cytokines in cultured retinal microglial cells with or without LPS treatment was investigated. Retinal microglial cells without LPS administration constitutively expressed modest quantities of mRNA transcripts for MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α and MIP-1β. Following LPS treatment, their expression was slightly upregulated, but the difference was statistically insignificant (Figure 4A). Retinal microglial cells without LPS treatment constitutively expressed low levels of mRNA transcripts for eotaxin, RANTES, and IL-10. Following LPS treatment, their expression was markedly upregulated. The expression of eotaxin and RANTES peaked 1 h after LPS stimulation; however, the expression of IL-10 was much delayed and peaked 4 h after LPS stimulation (Figure 4A).

Minocycline, sulforaphane or SB203580 alone did not affect the basal mRNA transcripts for MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, eotaxin, RANTES and IL-10. Pretreatment with minocycline, sulforaphane or SB203580 for 1 h followed by LPS administration significantly reduced LPS-induced upregulation of eotaxin, RANTES, and IL-10, but had no significant effect on the expression of MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (Figure 4B).

The protein production of MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, eotaxin, RANTES, and IL-10 in the culture media of microglial cells with or without LPS treatment was examined by ELISA assay. Microglial cells without LPS administration produced modest quantities of MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α and MIP-1β. Following exposure to LPS for 24 h, their production was not changed. Microglial cells without LPS administration produced low levels of eotaxin, RANTES and IL-10. Following exposure to LPS for 24 h, their production was significantly upregulated (Table 2).

Table 2. Effects of minocycline, sulforaphane or SB203580 on LPS-induced production of MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, eotaxin, RANTES, and IL-10.

Groups
MCP-1
MCP-3
MIP-1α
MIP-1β
eotaxin
RANTES
IL-10
culture without LPS treatment
180.08±13.21
155.21±8.76
26.34±3.61
43.89±2.78
16.08±4.91
21.44±7.08
15.01±2.46
culture with LPS treatment
192.46±8.67
164.49±14.31
30.17±4.68
40.62±6.34
76.23±9.31
96.39±10.26
70.83±5.69
minocycline pretreated and LPS-exposed culture
204.31±15.29
160.54±9.29
23.64±2.89
49.52±5.73
22.46±5.89*
38.61±5.37*
13.67±2.81*
sulforaphane pretreated and LPS-exposed culture
190.63±8.69
171.38±7.46
24.58±3.74
38.84±4.79
29.36±8.74*
34.46±3.83*
12.34±3.29*
SB203580 pretreated and LPS-exposed culture 176.33±10.21 150.74±8.63 26.01±2.54 36.35±4.81 19.31±4.26* 28.74±3.06* 15.73±4.87*

Asterisk indicates p<0.01 was considered significant compared to the culture with LPS treatment.

Minocycline, sulforaphane or SB203580 alone had no effect on the production of MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, eotaxin, RANTES, and IL-10. Pretreatment with minocycline, sulforaphane or SB203580 for 1 h followed by LPS administration significantly decreased LPS-induced production of eotaxin, RANTES and IL-10 in the culture media, but had no significant effect on the production of MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (Table 2).

The inhibitory effects of minocycline and sulforaphane were associated with the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases pathway in activated microglial cells

To examine whether minocycline or sulforaphane inhibit LPS-induced microglial activation via the NF-κB or MAPK pathway, the protein expression of the p65 subunit of NF-κB and the p-p38, p-p44/42, and p-JNK MAPKs in microglial cells with or without minocycline and sulforaphane treatment were investigated. Retinal microglial cells expressed low levels of the p65 subunit of NF-κB without LPS treatment, but expression was upregulated after stimulation with LPS. The p65 subunit was activated within 20 min after LPS stimulation, reached its peak at 30 min, and persisted at this level for least to 2 h. Without LPS treatment, the cells constitutively expressed high levels of p-p44/42, but expressed very low levels of p-p38 and p-JNK. An induced upregulation of p-p38 and p-JNK was demonstrated after stimulation with LPS, but the expression level for p-p44/42 was not changed. The p-p38 MAPK was activated within 20 min after LPS stimulation, started to decline after 1 h, and decreased back to basal levels within 2 h. P-JNK was activated within 20 min after LPS stimulation, reached its peak at 30 min, and persisted at this level for at least to 2 h (Figure 5A).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Western blot analysis demonstrated the inhibitory effects of minocycline, sulforaphane and SB203580 on the protein expression of the p65 subunit of nuclear factor-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinases in cultured retinal microglial cells. A: The protein expression of the p65 subunit of NF-κB and p-p38, p-p44/42, and p-JNK MAPKs in cultured microglia with or without LPS administration. The cultured retinal microglial cells constitutively expressed high levels of p-p44/42, but expressed low levels of p-p38, p-JNK, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB without LPS administration. Following exposure to LPS, the expression of p-p38, p-JNK, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB was upregulated. However, the expression of p-p44/42 was not changed. The ERK2 MAPK was used to assay total (phospho-independent) ERK and served as a control to ensure that equivalent quantities of proteins were used for SDS-PAGE. B: Pretreatment with minocycline, sulforaphane or SB203580 completely inhibited LPS-induced upregulation of p-p38, but had no effect on the expression of p-p44/42, p-JNK, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB.

Pretreatment with minocycline or sulforaphane for 1 h followed by LPS administration completely inhibited the LPS-induced upregulation of p-p38, but had no effect on the expression of p-p44/42, p-JNK, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB (Figure 5B).

Immunofluorescent studies

To further confirm the upregulation of p-p38, p-JNK, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB in LPS-stimulated microglial cells, protein levels were studied with immunofluorescence. Retinal microglial cells expressed very low levels of the p65 subunit of NF-κB without LPS administration (Figure 6A). Following LPS administration for 1 h, p65 subunit labeling was upregulated and translocated into nuclei (Figure 6B). Similarly, cells expressed low levels of p-p38 without LPS administration (Figure 6C). Following LPS administration for 1 h, p-p38 labeling was upregulated and positive labeling was present in both cytoplasm and nuclei (Figure 6D). Cells expressed low levels of p-JNK without LPS administration (Figure 6E), but labeling was upregulated following LPS administration for 1 h and was present mainly in the nuclei (Figure 6F). Pretreatment with minocycline (Figure 6G) or sulforaphane (Figure 6H) for 1 h followed by LPS administration completely inhibited LPS-induced upregulation of p-p38, but had no effect on the expression of p-JNK and the p65 subunit of NF-κB (data not shown).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Immunofluorescent localization of the p65 subunit of nuclear factor-κB and the p-p38, and p-JNK mitogen-activated protein kinases in cultured retinal microglial cells. A: Cells expressed very low levels of the p65 subunit of NF-κB without LPS administration. B: Following exposure to LPS for 1 h, p65 subunit labeling was upregulated and translocated into the nuclei (arrow). C: Cells expressed low levels of p-p38 without LPS administration. D: Following exposure to LPS for 1 h, p-p38 expression was upregulated and positive labeing was present in both cytoplasm (arrow) and nuclei (arrowhead). E: Retinal microglial cells expressed low levels of p-JNK without LPS administration. F: Following exposure to LPS for 1 h, the positive labeling of p-JNK was present mainly in nuclei (arrowhead). Pretreatment with minocycline G or sulforaphane H for 1 h followed by LPS administration completely inhibited LPS-induced upregulation of p-p38. All panels have the same scale and the scale bar equal to 8 μm.

Discussion

Our study demonstrated (1) the expression of 8 immunological signaling molecules (chemokines and noxious factors) in cultured retinal microglial cells treated with or without LPS; (2) that NF-κB and MAPKs were two cellular pathways involved in LPS-mediated microglial activation processes; and (3) that minocycline and sulforaphane had efficient inhibitory effects on LPS-mediated microglial activation processes, partly through a p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism.

In the present study, the cultured retinal microglial cells changed their morphological shape following LPS administration (Figure 1B,C). The mRNA expression of iNOS and subsequent production of NO were upregulated (Figure 4A and Figure 3A), as was mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines including eotaxin, RANTES and IL-10. However, mRNA expression of the chemokines MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β was not significantly changed (Figure 4A).

Microglial activation and the associated induction of NO and pro-inflammatory cytokines have been well documented in various neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease [21,22]. NO seemed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of endotoxin-induced uveitis [23] and light-induced retinal degeneration [24]. In the present study, we observed that iNOS mRNA expression and subsequent NO production were upregulated in retinal microglia after LPS treatment, suggested that NO may be an important mediator of the neurotoxic activity exerted by activated retinal microglial cells.

Chemokines and cytokines are immune signaling molecules that may inflict secondary damage during inflammation and exaggerate neurodegeneration [25,26]. Resting microglia are dominant immune surveillant cells which need appropriate stimulation to be transformed into full-blown macrophages [1,27]. The activation process included the synthesis of cytotoxic substances such as oxygen radicals, nitric oxide, proteases, and proinflammatory cytokines [28,29]. Eotaxin and RANTES are members of the C-C chemokine family, which were involved in macrophage recruitment during inflammation [30]. Therefore, the upregulated expression of eotaxin and RANTES in retinal microglia following LPS treatment might be important for the propagation and maintenance of the retinal immune response or for recruitment of more microglia to the lesion. Previous in vivo studies from Zeng et al. [5] demonstrated that normal retinas containing resting microglia do not expressed MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β. However, their expression was upregulated in retinal degeneration. In the present study, we demonstrated that the cultured retinal microglial cells without LPS treatment constitutively expressed modest quantities of MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β, and their expression was little changed after LPS treatment. This might be because cultured microglial cells in vitro exhibit a reactive phenotype and produce cytokines that are specific for reactive microglia [31]. The constitutively expressed chemokines in these cells might be due to the preparation procedure for the culture. Further in vivo studies are needed to illustrate their role in retinal disease.

It is accepted that the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the CNS is under strict control to maintain normal homeostasis of the CNS. We demonstrated that retinal microglial cells also secreted the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 after LPS treatment, which suppressed the activated microglia. The above observation strongly supported that retinal microglial cells play an important role in the propagation and maintenance of the retinal immune response. The upregulation of several chemokines in retinal microglial cells following treatment with LPS suggested the involvement of complicated immunological mechanisms in the retinal disease process.

In this study, LPS treatment upregulated the expression of the p65 subunit of NF-κB and the p-p38 and p-JNK MAPKs, but did not change the high levels of p-p44/42 MAPK expression (Figure 5 and Figure 6). NF-κB is a ubiquitous transcription factor that regulates a broad range of genes and is a central regulator of microglial response to activating stimuli, including LPS and cytokines [32]. One previous study demonstrated that, upon stimulation, IκB phosphorylation and degradation allowed NF-κB to translocate into the nucleus and recognize consensus sequences in target genes, including iNOS, IL-1β, and TNF-α [33]. Consistent with this finding, our observation demonstrated that the NF-κB pathway played a role in the LPS-induced retinal microglial activation process.

MAPKs are serine/threonine kinases and form one of the major pathways linking extracellular stimuli to transcriptional activation and gene expression. The p-p38 MAPK pathway is involved in the induction of several pro-inflammatory genes and p-p38 and p-JNK are always activated simultaneously [34]. In this study, we demonstrated that LPS stimulation induced the upregulation of p-p38 and p-JNK in retinal microglial cells, and p-p38 and p-JNK were activated simultaneously. SB203580, a specific inhibitor of p-p38, inhibited the LPS-induced retinal microglial morphological change and modulated cytokine expression. We suggested that the activation of p-p38 in retinal microglia by LPS is the first step in initiating the inflammatory process, resulting in the production of superoxide radicals and cytokines, which further stimulate the inflammatory response. The studies of Fukuda et al. [35] and Robinson et al. [36] showed that a constitutively active and nuclear form of p44/42 was sufficient for neurite outgrowth and cell transformation, and up to 80% of prostate cells in the stroma and basal layers stained positively for p-p44/42 within the nucleus [37]. In contrast, Combs et al. [38] argued that p-p44/42 might play a critical role in harmful microglial activation in acute brain injury, such as stroke, and in more chronic neurodegenerative disease, such as Alzheimer's disease. Our observations demonstrated that p-p44/42 was constitutively expressed in cultured retinal microglial cells without LPS administration. LPS administration did not alter its activity, suggesting that p44/42 does not play an important role in microglial activation in retinal disease.

Studies by Tang et al. [39] and Liu et al. [40] showed that the MAPK and NF-κB pathways, which were almost invariably co-activated by cytokines and stress, were intimately linked. One of the major molecules for p65 phosphorylation and transactivation appeared to be p-p38 [41]. Saccani et al. [42] also suggested that p-p38 further enhances NF-κB signaling via direct modification of histone proteins in the cryptic κB-regulatory element. In the present study, we demonstrated that SB203580 had no effect on the expression of p-p44/42, p-JNK, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB. It might be that the cellular pathways of NF-κB and MAPKs are relatively separate in LPS-induced microglial activation.

Minocycline was an anti-inflammatory agent which was used in the management of inflammatory and degenerative disease. It was shown to inhibit retinal microglial activation and migration in photic injury. Being a second-generation, semi-synthetic tetracycline with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, minocycline was shown to exert biological effects completely distinctive from tetracycline [43]. The mechanism by which minocycline suppressed LPS-induced activation of microglia is not clearly understood, but might be relate to the anti-inflammatory effect and inhibitory effect on microglial activation and migration. In contrast, sulforaphane inhibited phase enzymes such as cytochrome P450 and induces phase detoxification enzymes [44-46]. Intraperitoneal pretreatment with sulforaphane was found to attenuate light-induced retinal damage via an antioxidant-responsive element/thioredoxin signaling cascade [47]. It also suppressed inflammatory reaction in macrophage [17]. In this study, pre-treatment with minocycline or sulforaphane followed by LPS administration inhibited LPS-induced microglial morphological change and decreased mRNA expression of iNOS and subsequent NO production. They also inhibited LPS-induced upregulation of p-p38, but had no significant effect on the expression of p-p44/42, p-JNK, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB. Banati et al. [29] proposed that activated microglia exert cytotoxic effects in the brain through two very different yet complementary processes. First, they act as phagocytic cells, which involves direct cell-to-cell contact. Second, they are capable of releasing a large variety of potentially harmful substances. Our study suggested that the inhibitory effect of minocycline and sulforaphane on LPS-induced microglial activation suppressed the phagocytic activity and decreased the expression of inflammatory mediators. This inhibitory effect was associated with a p38-dependent pathway.

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that minocycline and sulforaphane inhibited LPS-induced retinal microglial activation, western blot and immunofluorescent studies showed decreased p-p38 MAPK expression. We suggested that the inhibitory effect of minocycline and sulforaphane was partly through a p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism. Given the fact that microglial activation contributes to the pathogenesis of several retinal disorders, minocycline or sulforaphane may be potential therapeutic agents for inflammatory or degenerative retinal diseases.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Michael Panitch Research Fund, RPB Foundation, and the Oliver Birckhead Research Fund, National Natural Science Foundation of China (30600689), and Research Fund from Peking University Third Hospital.

References

  • 1.Kreutzberg GW. Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:312–8. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gebicke-Haerter PJ. Microglia in neurodegeneration: molecular aspects. Microsc Res Tech. 2001;54:47–58. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boyle EA, McGeer PL. Cellular immune response in multiple sclerosis plaques. Am J Pathol. 1990;137:575–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hughes EH, Schlichtenbrede FC, Murphy CC, Sarra GM, Luthert PJ, Ali RR, Dick AD. Generation of activated sialoadhesin-positive microglia during retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2229–34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zeng HY, Zhu XA, Zhang C, Yang LP, Wu LM, Tso MO. Identification of sequential events and factors associated with microglial activation, migration, and cytotoxicity in retinal degeneration in rd mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2992–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gehrmann J, Matsumoto Y, Kreutzberg GW. Microglia: intrinsic immuneffector cell of the brain. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1995;20:269–87. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(94)00015-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hao AJ, Dheen ST, Ling EA. Induction of cytokine expression in the brain macrophages/amoeboid microglia of the fetal rat exposed to a teratogen. Neuroreport. 2001;12:1391–7. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200105250-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dheen ST, Jun Y, Yan Z, Tay SS, Ling EA. Retinoic acid inhibits expression of TNF-alpha and iNOS in activated rat microglia. Glia. 2005;50:21–31. doi: 10.1002/glia.20153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Minghetti L, Ajmone-Cat MA, De Berardinis MA, De Simone R. Microglial activation in chronic neurodegenerative diseases: roles of apoptotic neurons and chronic stimulation. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005;48:251–6. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Srinivasan B, Roque CH, Hempstead BL, Al-Ubaidi MR, Roque RS. Microglia-derived pronerve growth factor promotes photoreceptor cell death via p75 neurotrophin receptor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:41839–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402872200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roque RS, Rosales AA, Jingjing L, Agarwal N, Al-Ubaidi MR. Retina-derived microglial cells induce photoreceptor cell death in vitro. Brain Res. 1999;836:110–9. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01625-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen M, Ona VO, Li M, Ferrante RJ, Fink KB, Zhu S, Bian J, Guo L, Farrell LA, Hersch SM, Hobbs W, Vonsattel JP, Cha JH, Friedlander RM. Minocycline inhibits caspase-1 and caspase-3 expression and delays mortality in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington disease. Nat Med. 2000;6:797–801. doi: 10.1038/77528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu DC, Jackson-Lewis V, Vila M, Tieu K, Teismann P, Vadseth C, Choi DK, Ischiropoulos H, Przedborski S. Blockade of microglial activation is neuroprotective in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model of Parkinson disease. J Neurosci. 2002;22:1763–71. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-05-01763.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yrjanheikki J, Tikka T, Keinanen R, Goldsteins G, Chan PH, Koistinaho J. A tetracycline derivative, minocycline, reduces inflammation and protects against focal cerebral ischemia with a wide therapeutic window. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:13496–500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brundula V, Rewcastle NB, Metz LM, Bernard CC, Yong VW. Targeting leukocyte MMPs and transmigration: minocycline as a potential therapy for multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2002;125:1297–308. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang Y, Talalay P, Cho CG, Posner GH. A major inducer of anticarcinogenic protective enzymes from broccoli: isolation and elucidation of structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:2399–403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.6.2399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heiss E, Herhaus C, Klimo K, Bartsch H, Gerhauser C. Nuclear factor kappa B is a molecular target for sulforaphane-mediated anti-inflammatory mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:32008–15. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104794200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roque RS, Caldwell RB. Isolation and culture of retinal microglia. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12:285–90. doi: 10.3109/02713689308999475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim SS, Kong PJ, Kim BS, Sheen DH, Nam SY, Chun W. Inhibitory action of minocycline on lipopolysaccharide-induced release of nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 in BV2 microglial cells. Arch Pharm Res. 2004;27:314–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02980066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu M, Kusukawa N. SDS agarose gels for analysis of proteins. Biotechniques. 1998;24:676–8. doi: 10.2144/98244pf01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jellinger KA, Stadelmann C. Mechanisms of cell death in neurodegenerative disorders. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2000;59:95–114. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6781-6_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Uno H, Matsuyama T, Akita H, Nishimura H, Sugita M. Induction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the mouse hippocampus following transient forebrain ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997;17:491–9. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199705000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goureau O, Bellot J, Thillaye B, Courtois Y, de Kozak Y. Increased nitric oxide production in endotoxin-induced uveitis. Reduction of uveitis by an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase. J Immunol. 1995;154:6518–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Goureau O, Jeanny JC, Becquet F, Hartmann MP, Courtois Y. Protection against light-induced retinal degeneration by an inhibitor of NO synthase. Neuroreport. 1993;5:233–6. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199312000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huang D, Han Y, Rani MR, Glabinski A, Trebst C, Sorensen T, Tani M, Wang J, Chien P, O'Bryan S, Bielecki B, Zhou ZL, Majumder S, Ransohoff RM. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation of the nervous system: manifold roles and exquisite regulation. Immunol Rev. 2000;177:52–67. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2000.17709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xia MQ, Hyman BT. Chemokines/chemokine receptors in the central nervous system and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurovirol. 1999;5:32–41. doi: 10.3109/13550289909029743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Streit WJ. Microglial response to brain injury: a brief synopsis. Toxicol Pathol. 2000;28:28–30. doi: 10.1177/019262330002800104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Banati RB, Gehrmann J, Schubert P, Kreutzberg GW. Cytotoxicity of microglia. Glia. 1993;7:111–8. doi: 10.1002/glia.440070117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Colton CA, Gilbert DL. Production of superoxide anions by a CNS macrophage, the microglia. FEBS Lett. 1987;223:284–8. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80305-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mantovani A, Bottazzi B, Colotta F, Sozzani S, Ruco L. The origin and function of tumor-associated macrophages. Immunol Today. 1992;13:265–70. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(92)90008-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Slepko N, Levi G. Progressive activation of adult microglial cells in vitro. Glia. 1996;16:241–6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199603)16:3<241::AID-GLIA6>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.O'Neill LA, Kaltschmidt C. NF-kappa B: a crucial transcription factor for glial and neuronal cell function. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:252–8. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)01035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pahl HL. Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors. Oncogene. 1999;18:6853–66. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Raingeaud J, Gupta S, Rogers JS, Dickens M, Han J, Ulevitch RJ, Davis RJ. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and environmental stress cause p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by dual phosphorylation on tyrosine and threonine. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:7420–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.13.7420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fukuda M, Gotoh Y, Tachibana T, Dell K, Hattori S, Yoneda Y, Nishida E. Induction of neurite outgrowth by MAP kinase in PC12 cells. Oncogene. 1995;11:239–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Robinson MJ, Stippec SA, Goldsmith E, White MA, Cobb MH. A constitutively active and nuclear form of the MAP kinase ERK2 is sufficient for neurite outgrowth and cell transformation. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1141–50. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00485-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Royuela M, Arenas MI, Bethencourt FR, Sanchez-Chapado M, Fraile B, Paniagua R. Regulation of proliferation/apoptosis equilibrium by mitogen-activated protein kinases in normal, hyperplastic, and carcinomatous human prostate. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:299–306. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2002.32227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Combs CK, Johnson DE, Cannady SB, Lehman TM, Landreth GE. Identification of microglial signal transduction pathways mediating a neurotoxic response to amyloidogenic fragments of beta-amyloid and prion proteins. J Neurosci. 1999;19:928–39. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-03-00928.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tang G, Minemoto Y, Dibling B, Purcell NH, Li Z, Karin M, Lin A. Inhibition of JNK activation through NF-kappaB target genes. Nature. 2001;414:313–7. doi: 10.1038/35104568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liu H, Lo CR, Czaja MJ. NF-kappaB inhibition sensitizes hepatocytes to TNF-induced apoptosis through a sustained activation of JNK and c-Jun. Hepatology. 2002;35:772–8. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.32534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Waetzig GH, Seegert D, Rosenstiel P, Nikolaus S, Schreiber S. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is activated and linked to TNF-alpha signaling in inflammatory bowel disease. J Immunol. 2002;168:5342–51. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.10.5342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Saccani S, Pantano S, Natoli G. p38-Dependent marking of inflammatory genes for increased NF-kappa B recruitment. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:69–75. doi: 10.1038/ni748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Golub LM, Lee HM, Ryan ME, Giannobile WV, Payne J, Sorsa T. Tetracyclines inhibit connective tissue breakdown by multiple non-antimicrobial mechanisms. Adv Dent Res. 1998;12:12–26. doi: 10.1177/08959374980120010501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Talalay P, Fahey JW. Phytochemicals from cruciferous plants protect against cancer by modulating carcinogen metabolism. J Nutr. 2001;131:3027S–33S. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.11.3027S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Conaway CC, Jiao D, Chung FL. Inhibition of rat liver cytochrome P450 isozymes by isothiocyanates and their conjugates: a structure-activity relationship study. Carcinogenesis. 1996;17:2423–7. doi: 10.1093/carcin/17.11.2423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Conaway CC, Yang YM, Chung FL. Isothiocyanates as cancer chemopreventive agents: their biological activities and metabolism in rodents and humans. Curr Drug Metab. 2002;3:233–55. doi: 10.2174/1389200023337496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tanito M, Masutani H, Kim YC, Nishikawa M, Ohira A, Yodoi J. Sulforaphane induces thioredoxin through the antioxidant-responsive element and attenuates retinal light damage in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:979–87. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China

RESOURCES