Abstract
A fully stereocontrolled block synthesis of the title tetra- and hexasaccharides has been achieved taking advantage of the ability of the 4,6-O-benzylidene acetal to control the stereochemistry of the β-d-glycero-d-mannoheptopyranoside unit, and of a 2,3-O-diphenylmethylene acetal to install the α-l-rhamnopyranosidic linkages. Comparison of the spectral data for the hexasaccharide with that of the natural confirms the structure of this very unusual and structurally challenging glycan.
Introduction
In 1995 Kosma and coworkers described the characterization of the surface-layer glycoprotein from Bacillus thermoaerophilus, and proposed the very unusual disaccharide motif →4)-[α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glycero-d-mannoheptopyranosyl-(1→ as the repeating unit of the glycan chain, with the stereochemistry of the β-d-glycero-d-manno-heptopyranoside assigned on the basis of comparison of spectral data with synthetic methyl β-l-glycero-d-manno-heptopyranoside.1 Having recently described the first stereocontrolled route to β-d-glycero-d-manno-heptopyranosides and their 6-deoxy analogs,2 and applied this chemistry to a linear synthesis of methyl α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glycero-d-mannoheptopyranosyl-(1→3)-6-deoxy-β-glycero-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-l-rhamnopyranoside, a tetrasaccharide subunit from the Plesimonas shigelloides lipopolysaccharide,3 we selected this oligomer as a proving ground for a block synthesis approach to glycans containing the unusual β-d-glycero-d-manno-heptoside structure.4,5
Results and Discussion
Although our previous approach to the synthesis of the key d-glycero-d-manno-thioheptopyranoside donor was successful, and has subsequently been adopted by others,6 it suffered from a low yield at the level of the homologation step in which a six-carbon thiomannopyranoside was extended to a seven carbon system by Swern oxidation and Wittig olefination owing to competing elimination of a benzyloxy group from the 4-position in the course of the Wittig reaction.2,3 We began, therefore, by seeking to improve the homologation step and were attracted to the use of the Ley-bisacetal function7 for protection of the 3,4-diol functionality on the grounds that elimination would be retarded by the confinement of the putative alkoxide leaving group within the a fused bicyclic ring system. Thus, treatment of the bisacetal 18 with sodium hydride and benzyl bromide in DMF from −40 to 10 °C, according to the method described by Ley and others,9 afforded the 2-O-benzyl derivative 2 with good selectivity alongside a minor amount of the 2,6-di-O-benzyl system 3.10 Swern oxidation followed by standard Wittig homologation then afforded alkene 4 in 84% yield along with a minor amount of a methylthioalkene 5,11 representing a distinct improvement over the earlier protocol (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.
Improved homologation procedure
Catalytic osmoylation of 4 took place with excellent yield but poor selectivity for the formation of 6 and 8,12 whatever the conditions employed, in keeping with our previous observations3 and those of other workers 13 with closely related compounds (Table 1). Some minor over-oxidation to the corresponding sulfones 7 and 9 was also observed in these reactions.14
Table 1.
Osmoylation of Alkene 4
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Oxidant/ligand | Solvent | T/°C |
6/8 (yield) |
7/9 (yield) |
| 1 | OsO4/NMO | Acetone/H2O | 22 | 2.2/1 (86%) |
1.2/1 (8.4%) |
| 2 | AD- β-mix | t-BuOH/H2O | 22 | 1/1.2 (97%) |
not detected |
| 3 | AD-α-mix | t-BuOH/H2O | 0 | 1.2/1 (93%) |
not detected |
| 4 | K3Fe(CN)6/OsO4/(DHQ)2Pry | t-BuOH/H2O | 22 | 1.5/1 (96%) |
not detected |
| 5 | K3Fe(CN)6/OsO4/(DHQ)2Pry | t-BuOH/H2O/PhCH3 | 0 | 2.5/1 (96%) |
not detected |
Selective monobenzylation with dibutyltin oxide and benzyl bromide 15 of 6 and 8 afforded the corresponding 7-O-benzyl-6-ols 10 and 11 in excellent yield. Attempted inversion of the unwanted l,d-alcohol 11 to the desired d,d-isomer 10 by the Mitsunobu protocol16 was stymied by poor yields but the desired effect was achieved by recourse to displacement of the 6-O-triflate with potassium nitrite with in suit hydrolysis of the corresponding nitroso ester.17 Hydrolysis of the biacetal function in 10 to give a triol was followed by selective benzylidene acetal formation across the 1,3-diol functionality and introduction of a naphthylmethyl ether18 onto the remaining alcohol, thereby providing the known glycosyl donor 13 and, incidentally, confirming the d,d-stereochemistry of 6 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of Heptosyl Donor 13
Two l-rhamnopyranosyl acceptors 16 and 17 were prepared by protection of the corresponding triols as the benzophenone acetals19 in moderate yield (Scheme 3). Somewhat better yields of 16 and 17 have been reported in the literature for alkylation of 14 and 15 with dichlorodiphenylmethane in pyridine. 19a
Scheme 3.
Rhamnosyl Acceptor Preparation
A first glycosidic bond forming reaction involved activation of donor with 4-nitrophenylsulfenyl chloride and silver triflate in dichloromethane at −78 °C to give the corresponding glycosyl triflate followed by addition of the acceptor 16, when disaccharide 18 was obtained in 81% yield and exquisite β-selectivity in keeping with our previous observations in the benzylidene protected d-glycero-d-manno-heptoside series. The 4-nitrophenylsulfenyl chloride/silver triflate protocol20 is a convenient variant on benzenesulfenyl triflate activation protocol21 that employs a commercial, stable sulfenyl chloride. The anomeric stereochemistry of the newly assigned glycosidic bond is readily assigned on the basis of the shield, upfield nature of the heptoside H5 resonance (δ 2.63), something that is highly characteristic of 4,6-O-benzylidene protected β-mannosides and which carries over to corresponding benzylidene acetals of the β-d-glycero-d-manno-heptosides. Confirmation of this anomeric stereochemistry derives from the anomeric 159.7 Hz 1JH1,C1 coupling constant.22 Removal of the naphthylmethyl ether with dichlorodicyanoquinone in wet dichloromethane gave the glycosyl acceptor 19 in good yield (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4.
Upstream Disaccharide Synthesis
An analogous protocol was then applied to the coupling of donor 13 with the thioglycoside-containing acceptor 17 to give the thiodisaccharide 20, again with exquisite β-selectivity (for the heptopyranoside: δH5 2.63, 1JH1,C1 159.0 Hz). Unfortunately, yield were lower with acceptor 17 than with the corresponding methyl glycoside 16, maximizing at 54% when 1.2 eq of the sulfenyl chloride was employed. However, the 1-benzenesulfinyl piperidine (BSP)/trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride protocol proved superior when the activation was conducted in the presence of 1-octene as a sacrificial olefin, resulting in a 73% yield of the desired disaccharide (Scheme 5).
Scheme 5.
Disaccharide Donor Synthesis.
The tetrasaccharide 21, comprising two iterations of the Bacillus thermoaerophilus glycan repeating unit was then assembled by coupling of the disaccharide acceptor with the disaccharide donor 20 on activation with N-iodosuccinimide and silver triflate in excellent yield and α-selectivity. The 4-nitrophenylsulfenyl chloride/silver triflate protocol was also attempted but only gave the target compound in 26% yield. In addition to the two anomeric resonances characterizing the pre-installed β-mannoheptoside linkages, the 13C NMR spectrum of the tetrasaccharide contained resonances at δ 93.9 and 98.1 with 1JCH of 168.7 and 172.3 Hz indicative of the α-nature for the two rhamnoside linkages. Finally, global deprotection of 21 was achieved cleanly by hydrogenolysis over palladium on charcoal leading to the isolation of the target tetrasaccharide 22 in 85% yield (Scheme 6).
Scheme 6.
Tetrasaccharide Synthesis
The synthesis of the hexasaccharide 25 began with removal of the naphthylmethyl protecting group from tetrasaccharide 21 to give the acceptor 23, and was followed by NIS/AgOTf mediated coupling with the disaccharide donor 20 to give the hexasaccharide 24 in 64% yield as a single anomer. The α-nature of the rhamnopyranosidic linkage formed in this glycosylation again rested on the one bond CH coupling constant at the anomeric center of the newly formed glycosidic bond (167 Hz). Global deprotection was again achieved by hydrogenolysis, affording the target hexasaccharide in 60% yield (Scheme 7).
Scheme 7.
Hexasaccharide Synthesis
The spectral data for the central residues in hexasaccharide 25 were compared to those reported for the natural isolate and found to show a very high degree of concordance (supporting information), thereby confirming the structure proposed by Kosma and coworkers.
Conclusion
A block synthesis of the target hexasaccharide has been achieved and confirms the very rare β-dglycero-d-mannoheptospyranoside linkage at the heart of this glycan.
Experimental Section
General Experimental
Peak assignments in the NMR spectra were made in the usual manner with the assistance of phase sensitive COSY-45 and phase sensitive NOESY experiments.
Phenyl 2-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-1-thia-α-d-mannopyranoside (2) and Phenyl 2,6-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-1-thia-α-d-mannopyranoside (3)
To a cooled (−40 °C) solution of diol 18 (12.24 g, 31.67 mmol) in dry DMF (140 mL) was added benzyl bromide (4.20 mL, 35.4 mmol) followed by 60% NaH in mineral oil (2.57 g, 64.3 mmol). The resultant mixture was stirred for 1 h at −40 °C, then for 16 h at − 10 °C. The reaction mixture was poured into water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The collected organic phase was further washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/hexane = 1/4 to 1/3, then AcOEt/ CH2Cl2 = 3/1 to 2/1) to afford the monobenzylated ether 2 (12.21 g, 25.6 mmol, 81%). [α]D24 = + 221.3 (c 1.2, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43–7.41 (m, 4 H), 7.35-7.26 (m, 6 H), 5.48 (s, 1 H), 4.93 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.68 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.29 (t, 1 H, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.25-4.22 (m, 1 H), 4.08 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.5, 9.5 Hz), 3.99 (br. s, 1 H), 3.85-3.77 (m, 2 H), 3.33 (s, 3 H), 3.30 (s, 3 H), 1.90 (br. s, 1 H), 1.37 (s, 3 H), 1.34 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.6, 134.2, 132.0, 129.3, 128.5, 128.2, 127.8, 100.3, 99.9, 87.8, 77.7, 73.4, 72.2, 69.6, 64.1, 61.7, 48.3, 48.1, 18.0; HRMS m/z: calcd for C25H32O7NaS, 499.1766 [M+Na+]; Found C25H32O7NaS, 499.1761; and 38 (1.51 g, 3.90 mmol, 12%). [α]D23 = +172.2 (c 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51-7.46 (m, 4 H), 7.36-7.24 (m, 11 H), 5.59 (s, 1 H), 4.94 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.74 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.66 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.55 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.50-4.48 (m, 1 H), 4.36-4.32 (m, 1 H), 4.13-4.10 (m, 1 H), 4.03 (s, 1 H), 3.88-3.84 (m, 2 H), 3.58 (s, 3 H), 3.25 (s, 3 H), 1.40 (s, 3 H), 1.36 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.83, 138.81, 134.6, 132.0, 129.2, 128.5, 128.4, 128.0, 127.74, 127.71, 127.67, 127.5, 100.3, 99.9, 87.6, 77.9, 73.6, 73.0, 72.0, 69.8, 69.0, 64.2, 48.3, 48.2, 18.12, 18.09; HRMS m/z: calcd for C32H42NO7NaS, 584.2682 [M+NH4+]; C32H42NO7NaS, 584.2674; calcd for C32H38O7NaS, 589.2236 [M+Na+], Found C32H38O7NaS, 589.2238.
Phenyl 2-O-benzyl-6,7-dideoxy-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-1-thia-α-d-manno-hepto-6-enopyranoside (4) and Phenyl 2-O-benzyl-6,7-dideoxy-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-1-thia-α-d-manno-hepto-(E)-7-methylthio-6-enopyranoside (5)
To a cooled (−75 °C) solution of oxalyl chloride (1.07 mL, 12.46 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was added a solution of DMSO (1.80 10 mL, 25.34 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (3 mL). After stirring for 10 min. at −75 °C, a solution of alcohol 2 (2.95 g, 6.19 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL + 1 mL rinse) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 15 min. at −75 °C, then for 45 min at to −60 °C, and then for 45 min at −45 °C. At this stage Et3N (6.80 mL, 48.92 mmol) was added dropwise, after which stirring was continued for 45 min. at −45 °C, before the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to −0 °C over 2 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated, and the residue was dried for 12 hours at −20 °C in vacuum before it was taken up in THF (9 mL + 2 mL rinse) and added to a −40 °C stirred solution of the Wittig reagent formed by addition of n-BuLi in hexane (1.80 M, 7.5 mL, 13.50 mmol) at 0 °C to a suspension of Ph3PCH3Br (5.00 g, 14.00 mmol) in THF (30 mL) and cooling to −40 °C. The resulting mixture was stirred for 1.5 at −40 °C, then warmed to 10 °C over 2.5 h before it was poured into water and extracted with CH2Cl2. The collected organic phase was further washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/hexane = 1/15) to furnish alkene 4 (2.45 g, 5.17 mmol, 84%). [α]D24 = + 251.7 (c 1.3, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.45-7.41 (m, 4 H), 7.35-7.25 (m, 6 H), 6.02-5.95 (m, 1 H), 5.52 (s, 1 H), 5.45-5.42 (m, 1 H), 5.27-5.24 (m, 1 H), 4.91 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.71 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.63 (t, 1 H, J = 7.50 Hz), 4.09-4.03 (m, 2 H), 3.99 (m, 1 H), 3.33 (s, 3 H), 3.26 (s, 3 H), 1.38 (s, 3 H), 1.34 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.7, 134.8, 134.0, 131.6, 129.2, 128.5, 128.2, 127.8, 127.6, 118.1, 100.2, 100.0, 87.6, 77.8, 73.2, 72.3, 69.8, 67.8, 48.2, 48.1, 18.1, 18.0; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C26H32O6NaS, 495.1817 [M+Na+], Found C26H32O6NaS, 495.1826; and alkene 5 (58.1 mg, 112 µmol, 1.8%). [α]d23 = + 218.3 (c 0.97, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43-7.38 (m, 4 H), 7.34-7.24 (m, 6 H), 6.45 (dd, 1 H, J = 1.0, 15.0 Hz), 5.47 (s, 1 H), 5.45 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.5, 15.5 Hz), 4.89 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.70 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.65 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 4.05-4.00 (m, 2 H), 3.96 (m, 1 H), 3.32 (s, 3 H), 3.25 (s, 3 H), 2.24 (s, 3 H), 1.36 (s, 3 H), 1.33 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.6, 134.8, 131.6, 129.8, 129.3, 128.5, 128.2, 127.8, 127.6, 120.4, 100.2, 100.0, 87.7, 77.8, 73.3, 72.4, 69.7, 68.0, 48.2, 48.0, 18.1, 18.0, 14.6; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C27H34O6NaS2, 541.1695 [M+Na+], Found C27H34O6NaS, 541.1675.
Phenyl 2-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-d-glycero-1-thia-α-d-manno-heptopyranoside (6), Phenyl 2-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-d-glycero-1-sulfonyl-α-d-manno-heptopyranoside (7), Phenyl 2-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-l-glycero-1-thia-α-d-manno-heptopyranoside (8), and Phenyl 2-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-l-glycero-1-sulfonyl-α-d-manno-heptopyranoside (9)
Method 1
To a solution of alkene 4 (345 mg, 730 µmol) in 8/1 acetone/H2O (9 mL), chilled in an ice-water bath, was added NMO (139 mg, 1.2 mmol) and OsO4 (13.0 mg, 5 µmol). After stirring for 7 h, the reaction was quenched with a solution of sodium sulfite and extracted with AcOEt. The collected organic phase was further washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated. The residue was subjected to silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/CH2Cl2 = 1/4, then AcOEt/hexane = 1/1 and AcOEt/CH2Cl2 = 2/5) to afford 6 (219.3 mg, 433 µmol, 59%), [α]D24 = + 240.3 (c 0.94, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43-7.40 (m, 4 H), 7.35-7.26 (m, 6 H), 5.43 (s, 1 H), 4.91 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.67 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.37 (t, 1 H, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.26 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.0, 10.0 Hz), 4.07 (dd, 1 H, J = 3.0, 10.0 Hz), 3.96-3.93 (m, 2 H), 3.70-3.63 (m, 2 H), 3.33 (s, 3 H), 3.31 (s, 3 H), 3.16 (d, 1 H, OH, J = 3.0 Hz), 2.20 (t, 1 H, OH, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.36 (s, 3 H), 1.33 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.5, 133.7, 132.2, 129.4, 128.5, 128.2, 128.1, 127.9, 100.3, 100.2, 87.8, 77.5, 73.5, 73.4, 71.2, 69.4, 67.1, 63.2, 48.6, 48.3, 18.1, 18.0; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C26H34O8NaS, 529.1872 [M+Na+], Found C26H34O8NaS, 529.1859; 7 (18.3 mg, 34 µmol, 4.6%). [α]D23 = + 148.7 (c 0.78, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.93 (d, 2 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.69 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.58 (t, 2 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.44 (d, 2 H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.37-7.31 (m, 3 H), 5.00 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.72 (s, 1 H), 4.67 (d, 1 H, J = 11.0 Hz), 4.61 (d, 1 H, J= 3.0 Hz), 4.52-4.49 (m, 2 H), 4.35 (t, 1 H, J = 9.0 Hz), 3.79-3.75 (m, 1 H), 3.57-3.52 (m, 2 H), 3.35 (s, 3 H), 3.33 (s, 3 H), 3.27 (br s, 1 H, OH), 2.23 (br. s, 1 H, OH), 1.37 (s, 3 H), 1.35 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ138.1, 136.7, 134.6, 129.5, 129.3, 128.6, 128.4, 128.1, 100.3, 100.1, 93.0, 74.7, 74.1, 73.9, 71.9, 69.1, 66.1, 62.4, 48.6, 48.4, 18.0, 17.9; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C26H34O10NaS, 561.1770 [M+Na+], Found C26H34O10NaS, 561.1748; 8 (101.0 mg, 199 µmol, 27%), [α]D24 = + 232.2 (c 1.1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43 (d, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.38-7.28 (m, 8 H), 5.52 (s, 1 H), 4.95 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.67 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.42 (t, 1 H, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.14 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.0, 10.0 Hz), 4.08 (dd, 1 H, J = 3.0, 10.0 Hz), 3.97-3.95 (m, 1 H), 3.94-3.90 (m, 1 H), 3.50 (br. s, 2 H), 3.33 (s, 3 H), 3.32 (s, 3 H), 2.66 (d, 1 H, OH, J = 6.0 Hz), 1.85 (br s, 1 H, OH), 1.36 (s, 3 H), 1.33 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.5, 133.3, 132.1, 129.5, 128.6, 128.2, 127.9, 100.3, 100.0, 87.6, 77.3, 73.5, 72.9, 69.7, 68.8, 65.1, 63.4, 48.3, 18.1, 18.0; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C26H34O8NaS, 529.1872 [M+Na+], Found C26H34O10NaS, 529.1874; 9 (15.1 mg, 28 µmol, 3.8%). [α]D 23 = + 135.8 (c 0.67, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85 (d, 2 H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.70 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.59 (t, 2 H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.44 (d, 2 H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.37-7.30 (m, 3 H), 5.03 (d, 1 H, J = 11.0 Hz), 4.81 (s, 1 H), 4.67 (d, 1 H, J = 11.0 Hz), 4.60 (d, 1 H, J= 3.0 Hz), 4.49-4.45 (m, 1 H), 4.41-4.37(m, 2 H), 3.89 (m, 1 H), 3.51-3.44 (m, 2 H), 3.35 (s, 3 H), 3.32 (s, 3 H), 2.10 (br. s, 1 H, OH), 1.72 (br. s, 1 H, OH), 1.37 (s, 3 H), 1.33 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.1, 136.9, 134.7, 129.6, 128.9, 128.6, 128.5, 128.1, 100.1, 100.0, 93.2, 76.8, 74.7, 71.9, 69.2, 68.9, 64.6, 62.0, 48.4, 48.3, 17.9; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C26H34O10NaS, 561.1770 [M+Na+], Found C26H34O10NaS, 561.1746.
Method 2
To a mixture of alkene 4 (1.52 g, 3.2 mmol) in 1/1 t-BuOH/H2O (32 mL) was added toluene (2.5 mL), K2CO3 (1.31 g, 9.7 mmol), and K3Fe(CN)6 (3.29 g, 10.0 mmol). After stirring for 10 min, the mixture was cooled to 0 °C followed by addition of (DHQ)2Pry (29.1 mg, 0.033 mmol), and a solution of OsO4 in t-BuOH (2.5 wt%, 161 µL). After the mixture was stirred for 24 h, additional t -BuOH/H2O (8 mL, 1/1), K2CO3 (344 mg, 2.5 mmol), and K3Fe(CN)6 (832 mg, 2.5 mmol) were added. Stirring was continued for another 24 h before the reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2, washed with sat. aqueous NaSO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was subjected to silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/CH2Cl2 = 1/4) to give 6 (1.12 g, 2.2 mmol, 68%) and 8 (455 mg, 0.9 mmol, 28%).
Phenyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-d-glycero-1-thia-α-d-manno-heptopyranoside (10)
To a solution of diol 6 (1.69 g, 3.33 mmol) in anhydrous toluene (80 mL) was added Bu2SnO (957 mg, 3.84 mmol) after which the reaction mixture was heated to refluxed in a Dean-Stark apparatus. After 2 h, the resulting clear solution was cooled to room temperature and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in DMF (30 mL) under N2, and benzyl bromide (0.48 mL, 4.04 mmol) and CsF (1.07 g, 7.06 mmol) were added. The resulting mixture was stirred for 16 h at room temperature under N2, then was diluted with CH2Cl2, washed with aqueous KF and brine. The organic phase was collected, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/Hexane = 1/6) to yield ether 10 (1.90 g, 3.19 mmol, 96%). [α]D24 = + 186.5 (c 1.2, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.41-7.36 (m, 4 H), 7.34-7.23 (m, 11 H), 5.47 (s, 1 H), 4.89 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.67 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.53 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.48 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.36 (t, 1 H, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.20 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.0, 10.0 Hz), 4.13-4.10 (m, 1 H), 4.03 (dd, 1 H, J = 3.0, 10.5 Hz), 3.93-3.92 (m, 1 H), 3.57 (d, 2 H, J = 5.0 Hz), 3.30 (s, 3 H), 3.23 (s, 3 H), 2.84 (d, 1 H, OH, J = 2.5 Hz), 1.33 (s, 3 H), 1.28 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.6, 138.5, 134.3, 131.6, 129.3, 128.6, 128.2, 128.1, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7, 100.3, 100.0, 87.5, 77.5, 73.6, 73.3, 72.8, 71.0, 69.6, 65.9, 48.5, 48.3, 18.1, 18.0; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C33H40O8NaS, 619.2342 [M+Na+], Found C33H40O8NaS, 619.2323.
Phenyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-l-glycero-1-thia-α-d-manno-heptopyranoside (11)
Following the protocol for 10, diol 8 (1.16 g, 2.29 mmol) gave rise to ether 11 (1.24 g, 2.08 mmol, 91%). [α]D24 = + 198.7 (c 0.97, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43 (d, 2 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.36-7.22 (m, 13 H), 5.56 (s, 1 H), 4.92 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.69 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.48-4.40 (m, 3 H), 4.15-4.13 (m, 2 H), 4.06 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.5, 10.0 Hz), 3.95 (br. s, 1 H), 3.38 (t, 1 H, J = 10.5 Hz), 3.31-3.29 (m, 7 H), 2.15 (br s, 1 H, OH), 1.36 (s, 3 H), 1.31 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.6, 138.3, 134.1, 131.5, 129.2, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 127.9, 127.8, 127.6, 100.3, 99.9, 87.3, 77.3, 73.5, 73.3, 71.8, 71.3, 69.9, 67.6, 63.1, 48.2, 18.0; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C33H40O8NaS, 619.2342 [M+Na+], Found C33H40O8NaS, 619.2333.
Formation of Phenyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-3,4-O-(2',3'-dimethoxybutane-2',3'-diyl)-d-glycero-1-thia-α-d-manno-heptopyranoside (10) by Stereochemical Inversion of 11
Method 1
To a solution of alcohol 11 (267.9 mg, 450 µmol), 4-nitrobenzoic acid (155 mg, 924 µmol), and triphenylphosphine (238 mg, 910 µmol), cooled at 0 °C, in THF (125 mL) was added diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (177 µL, 899 µmol). The reaction mixture was allowed to ambient temperature and was stirred for 12 h before it was diluted with CH2Cl2, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The residue was subjected to silica gel chromatography to give ester (73.1 mg, 98 µmol, 22%), which was treated with K2CO3 (45.8 mg, 331 µmol) in 2/1 MeOH/THF (3 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred for 16 h at ambient temperature under N2, then concentrated under reduced pressure. The solid was diluted with CH2Cl2, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, concentrated, and purified by silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/hexane = 1/5) to afford 10 (55.4 mg, 93 µmol, 95%).
Method 2
To a chilled (−40 °C) solution of alcohol 11 (478.7 mg, 802 µmol) in CH2Cl2 (12 mL) was added anhydrous pyridine (163 µL, 2.0 mmol) and Tf2O (240 µL, 1.45 mmol, 1.8 eq) after which the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min at −40 °C, then warmed to −5 °C over 80 min, then was poured into cold 0.2 N HCl and extracted with CH2Cl2. The collected organic phase was further washed with cold aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The resulting residue was dissolved in dry DMF (10 mL), 18-C-6 (57 mg, 0.22 mmol) and KNO2 (460 mg, 5.4 mmol) were added. After stirring for 13 hours, more 18-c-6 (256.3 mg, 0.97 mmol) and KNO2 (324 mg, 3.8 mmol) were added. Stirring was continued for 71 h before the reaction mixture was poured into 1 N aqueous K2CO3, and stirred for 2 h, and extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic phase was washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/hexane = 1/5) to afford alcohol 10 (331 mg, 556 µmol, 69%).
Phenyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-d-glycero-1-thia-α-d-manno-heptopyranoside (12)
To a solution of 1,2-diacetal 10 (2.21 g, 3.7 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was added a 10/1 mixture of TFA/H2O (15 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred for 40 min at ambient temperature under N2 before the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and residue purified by silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/CH2Cl2 = 1/1 to 3/2) to give triol (1.600 g, 3.3 mmol, 89%), which was dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (36 mL) and treated with camphorsulfonic acid (52.2 mg, 0.23 mmol) and benzaldehyde dimethyl acetal (2.4 mL, 16 mmol). After stirring for 14 h at room temperature under N2, the mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2, washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was subjected to flash chromatography on silica gel to afford benzylidene 12 (1.641 g, 2.9 mmol, 87%). [α]D23 = + 144.3 (c 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.54-7.53 (m, 2 H), 7.41-7.24 (m, 18 H), 5.68 (s, 1 H), 5.62 (s, 1 H), 4.77 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.66 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.53 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.48 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.14-4.01 (m, 5 H), 3.58-3.51 (m, 2 H), 2.44 (d, 1 H, OH, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.4, 137.5, 137.4, 133.7, 131.9, 129.3, 128.9, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 127.8, 127.7, 126.7, 101.9, 86.0, 79.9, 78.8, 78.7, 73.7, 73.5, 69.4, 65.7; HRMS m/z: calcd for C34H34O6NaS, 593.1974 [M+Na+]; Found C34H34O6NaS, 593.1962.
Phenyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-3-O-(2-naphthalenylmethyl)-d-glycero-1-thia-α-d-manno-heptopyranoside (13)
To a solution of alcohol 12 (1.60 g, 2.8 mmol) in dry DMF (24 mL), cooled in an ice-water bath, was added 60% NaH in mineral oil (230 mg, 5.8 mmol). After stirring for 20 min, tetrabutylammonium iodide (106 mg, 0.29 mmol) and 2-(bromomethyl)naphthalylene (843 mg, 3.7 mmol) were added and theresulting mixture was stirred for 12.5 h in the dark at room temperature under N2. At this point MeOH (2.0 mL) was added, followed by neutralization with acidic resin to pH 6.0. The solid was filtered off and the filtrate was concentrated under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2, and washed with aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/hexane = 1/8 to 1/6) to yield ether 133 (1.941 g, 2.7 mmol, 97%). [α]D24 = + 110.0 (c 0.80, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87-7.82 (m, 3 H), 7.76-7.74 (m, 1 H), 7.62-7.60 (m, 2 H), 7.49-7.46 (m, 3 H), 7.44-7.22 (m, 18 H), 5.80 (s, 1 H), 5.60 (s, 1 H), 4.98 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.84 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.80 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.76 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.57 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.51 (d, 1 H, J = 13.0 Hz), 4.42 (t, 1 H, J = 8.5 Hz), 4.19-4.12 (m, 2 H), 4.09-4.04 (m, 2 H), 3.63 (d, 1 H, J = 11.0 Hz), 3.57 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.5, 12.0 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.6, 137.9, 136.1, 133.8, 133.6, 133.2, 131.8, 129.3, 129.1, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7, 126.6, 126.3, 126.1, 125.9, 101.4, 86.8, 78.8, 78.4, 77.9, 76.7, 73.7, 73.4, 73.3, 69.5, 66.4; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C45H42O6NaS, 733.2600 [M+Na+]; Found C45H42O6NaS, 733.2561.
Methyl 2,3-O-diphenylmethylene-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (16)
Triol 1423 (1.426 g, 8.0 mmol), benzophenone dimethyl acetal24 (3.649 g, 16.0 mmol), and camphorsulfonic acid (308.4 mg, 1.39 mmol) were dissolved in dry DMF (20 mL). The mixture was stirred in a 50 °C water bath in a rotary evaporator for 8 h under the reduced pressure (27 mm Hg), to remove methanol formed during the reaction, then was poured into a saturated solution of NaHCO3 in H2O, and extracted with AcOEt. The organic phase was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (AcOEt/hexane = 1/5to1/4) to afford 1619a (1.29 g, 3.8 mmol, 47%). [α]D24 = − 71.6 (c 0.65, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.53-7.51 (m, 4 H), 7.34-7.27 (m, 6 H), 5.02 (s, 1 H), 4.28 (t, 1 H, J = 6.5 Hz), 4.06 (d, 1 H, J = 5.5 Hz), 3.71-3.66 (m, 1 H), 3.42-3.39 (m, 1 H), 3.38 (s, 3 H), 2.28 (br s, 1 H, OH), 1.27 (d, 3 H, J = 6.0 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.1, 142.7, 128.4, 128.3, 126.3, 126.2, 109.8, 98.3, 79.1, 76.1, 74.1, 66.2, 55.2, 17.3; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C20H22O5Na, 365.1365 [M+Na+]; Found C20H22O5Na, 365.1353.
Phenyl 2,3-O-diphenylmethylene-1-thia-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (17)
Following the protocol for 16, treatment of thioglycoside 1525 (1.60 g, 6.2 mmol) with benzophenone dimethyl acetal24 (2.84 g, 12.5 mmol) and camphorsulfonic acid (81 mg, 0.35 mmol) furnished alcohol 1719a (1.03 g, 2.4 mmol, 39%). [α]D24 = − 191.0 (c 1.2, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.54-7.47 (m, 6 H), 7.46-7.25 (m, 9 H), 5.91 (s, 1 H), 4.34 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.5, 7.0 Hz), 4.29 (d, 1 H, J = 6.0 Hz), 4.14-4.09 (m, 1 H), 3.45-3.40 (m, 1 H), 2.14 (br s, 1 H), 1.19 (d, 3 H, J = 6.5 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.2, 142.9, 133.6, 132.3, 129.3, 128.5, 128.4, 127.9, 126.2, 126.0, 109.8, 83.8, 79.3, 77.1, 74.9, 67.2, 17.3; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C25H24O4NaS, 443.1293 [M+Na+]; Found C25H24O4NaS, 443.1277.
Methyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-3-O-(2-naphthalenylmethyl)-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-(diphenylmethylene)-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (18)
A flask, charged with thioheptoside 13 (206.4 mg, 290 µmol), TTBP (240.1 mg, 967 µmol), silver triflate (232 mg, 903 µmol) and 4 Å molecular sieves (500 mg), was dried under vacuum for 1 h with the exclusion of light. Then dry CH2Cl2 (7 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at −78 °C before 4-nitrobenzenesulfenyl chloride (112.0 mg, 591 µmol) was added in one portion as a solid. After stirring for 10 min at −78 °C, the mixture was warmed to −45 °C, and stirring continued for 15 min before the reaction mixture was recooled to −78 °C. A solution of methyl rhamnoside 16 (130 mg, 380 µmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL + 0.5 mL rinse) then was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at −78 °C, then warmed to −45 °C and stirring continued for 3 h. Saturated aqueous NaHCO3 was added, and after filtration of the solid, the filtrate was further washed with aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (AcOEt/PhCH3 = 1/40 to 1/30) to afford disaccharide 18 (221.1 mg, 234 µmol, 81%) as a white foam. [α]D24 = − 59.5 (c 0.63, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80-7.78 (m, 3 H), 7.68-7.56 (m, 1 H), 7.52-7.27 (m, 25 H), 7.07-7.05 (m, 3 H), 5.71 (s, 1 H), 5.02 (s, 1 H), 4.97 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.88 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.85 (d, 1 H, J = 13.0 Hz), 4.78 (d, 1 H, J = 13.0 Hz), 4.54 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.50 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.38 (s, 1 H), 4.23 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.0, 7.5 Hz), 4.18 (t, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 4.10 (t, 1 H, J = 8.0 Hz), 4.03-4.02 (m, 2 H), 3.65-3.60 (m, 1 H), 3.53-3.50 (m, 2 H), 3.39 (s, 3 H), 3.34 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.5, 11.5 Hz), 3.27 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.5, 10.0 Hz), 2.63 (t, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 1.19 (d, 3 H, J = 6.0 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.2, 143.1, 138.8, 138.5, 137.9, 133.5, 133.2, 129.0, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 127.8, 126.6, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 126.1, 125.8, 109.4, 102.3 (JC1–H1 = 159.7 Hz), 101.2, 98.0 (JC1–H1 = 174.6 Hz), 80.8, 79.1, 78.9, 78.0, 77.8, 76.5, 76.2, 75.0, 73.6, 72.5, 69.5, 68.7, 64.6, 55.2, 17.8; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C59H58O11Na, 965.3877 [M+Na+]; Found C59H58O11Na, 965.3904.
Methyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-(diphenylmethylene)-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (19)
To a heterogenerous mixture of 18 (252.2 mg, 267 µmol) in 9/1 CH2Cl2/H2O (6.6 mL) was added DDQ (96.0 mg, 423 µmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h at ambient temperature under N2, then was diluted with CH2Cl2, washed with aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (AcOEt/hexane = 1/4 to 1/3) to furnish alcohol 19 (185.2 mg, 231 µmol, 86%) as a white foam. [α]D24 = − 88.1 (c 0.1.1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52-7.48 (m, 6 H), 7.41-7.22 (m, 18 H), 7.15 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 5.60 (s, 1 H), 5.05 (s, 1 H), 5.02 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz), 4.68 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.58 (s, 1 H), 4.55 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.52 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.35 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.0, 7.5 Hz), 4.06-3.99 (m, 3 H), 3.77 (t, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 3.68-3.62 (m, 2 H), 3.49 (dd, 1 H, J = 1.5, 11.5 Hz), 3.39 (s, 3 H), 3.72-3.32 (m, 2 H), 2.60 (t, 1 H, J = 9.0 Hz), 2.37 (br. s, 1 H, OH), 1.21 (d, 3 H, J = 6.0Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.2, 138.5, 138.4, 137.5, 129.2, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 126.6, 126.2, 126.1, 125.9, 109.5, 102.1, 101.6, 98.0, 80.6, 79.2, 79.0, 78.6, 78.5, 76.5, 75.8, 73.6, 71.1, 69.5, 68.3, 64.5, 55.2, 17.9; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C48H50O11Na, 825.3251 [M+Na+]; Found C48H50O11Na, 825.3207.
Phenyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-3-O-(2-naphthalenylmethyl)-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-diphenylmethylene-1-thia-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (20)
Method 1
A mixture of thioheptoside 13 (90.1 mg, 127 µmol), TTBP (70.9 mg, 285 µmol), and AgOTf (81.6 mg, 318 µmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) in the presence of 4 Å molecular sieves (290 mg) was stirred for 0.5 h at −78 °C before 4-nitrobenzenesulfenyl chloride (29.6 mg, 156 µmol) was added as a solid. After stirring for 10 min, the reaction mixture was warmed to −45 °C, and stirred for 10 min before it was recooled to −78 °C followed by the addition of a solution of thiorhamnoside 17 (64.8 mg, 154 µmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL + 0.5 mL rinse). The resulting mixture was stirred for 4 h at −78 °C and then saturated aqueous NaHCO3 was added to quench the reaction, and the solid was filtered off. The filtrate was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/PhCH3 = 1/40) to afford disaccharide 20 (70.1 mg, 69 µmol, 54%). [α]D23 = − 115.5 (c 0.74, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83-7.80 (m, 3 H), 7.73-7.70 (m, 1 H), 7.54-7.28 (m, 30 H), 7.06-7.04 (m, 3 H), 5.89 (s, 1 H), 5.72 (s, 1 H), 4.99 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.94 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.90 (d, 1 H, J = 13.0 Hz), 4.83 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.54 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.50 (d, 1 H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.31 (s, 1 H), 4.26 (d, 1 H, J = 5.5 Hz), 4.22-4.18 (m, 2 H), 4.11-4.04 (m, 2 H), 4.04 (d, 1 H, J = 2.5 Hz), 3.52 (dd, 1 H, J = 3.0, 10.0 Hz), 3.49 (d, 1 H, J = 10.0 Hz), 3.59-3.29 (m, 2 H), 2.60 (t, 1 H, J = 10.0 Hz), 1.14 (d, 3 H, J = 6.0 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.12, 143.07, 138.8, 138.5, 137.9, 136.1, 133.5, 133.2, 132.3, 129.4, 129.1, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.13, 128.07, 127.96, 127.90, 127.86, 126.6, 126.5, 126.4, 126.1, 125.8, 125.6, 109.4, 102.3 (JC1–H1 = 159.0 Hz), 101.2, 83.9 (JC1–H1 = 167.2 Hz), 81.2, 78.9, 78.8, 78.0, 77.9, 77.0, 76.1, 75.0, 73.6, 72.6, 69.5, 68.6, 66.3, 17.6; HR-ESI m/z: calcd for C64H60O10NaS, 1043.3805 [M+Na+]; Found C64H60O10NaS, 1043.3755.
Method 2
A mixture of thioheptoside 13 (535.6 mg, 753 µmol), TTBP (298.1 mg, 1.2 mmol), and BSP (168.5 mg, 805 µmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) in the presence of 4 Å molecular sieves (500 mg) was stirred for 0.5 h at ambient temperature. Then the mixture was cooled to −60 °C, and Tf2O (156 µL, 940 µmol) was added dropwise. After stirring for 6 min at −78 °C, 1-octene (2.0 mL, 12.7 mmol) was added, and stirring continued for 5 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to −78 °C followed by the addition of a solution of thiorhamnoside 17 (480.0 mg, 1.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL + 0.5 mL rinse). The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 h at −78 °C before saturated aqueous NaHCO3 was added to quench the reaction, and the solid was filtered off. The filtrate was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (AcOEt/PhCH3 = 1/50) to afford disaccharide 20 (561.0 mg, 549 µmol, 73%).
Methyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-3-O-(2-naphthaleneylmethyl)-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-(diphenylmethylene)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-(diphenylmethylene)-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (21)
A mixture of alcohol 19 (90.0 mg, 112 µmol), and thioheptoside 20 (135.3 mg, 132 µmol) in CH2Cl2 (6 mL) in the presence of 4 Å molecular sieves (320 mg) was stirred for 50 min at ambient temperature under N2 atmosphere. Then the mixture was cooled to −15 °C, and NIS (38.4 mg, 170 µmol) and AgOTf (16.9 mg, 66 µmol) was subsequently added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2.5 h while the reaction temperature was increased to 5 °C. The solids were filtered off, and the filtrate was washed with saturated aqueous Na2S2O3 containing NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (AcOEt/PhCH3 = 1/20 to 1/15) to afford tetrasaccharide 21 (164.2 mg, 96 µmol, 85%). [α]D23 = − 86.6 (c 1.2, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80-7.76 (m, 3 H), 7.68-7.66 (m, 1 H), 7.57-7.19 (m, 46 H), 7.15-7.01 (m, 7 H), 5.70 (s, 1 H), 5.60 (s, 1 H), 5.07 (s, 1 H), 5.01 (s, 1 H), 4.85 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.83 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.77-4.64 (m, 4 H), 4.56-4.48 (m, 5 H), 4.34 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.5, 7.0 Hz), 4.30 (t, 2 H, J = 6.5 Hz), 4.14 (t, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 4.11-4.04 (m, 3 H), 4.02-3.92 (m, 3 H), 3.91-3.86 (m, 1 H), 3.83 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.0, 9.5 Hz), 3.70-3.66 (m, 1 H), 3.52 (d, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 3.47 (d, 1 H, J = 10.0 Hz), 3.43-3.41 (m, 4 H), 3.37-3.33 (m, 1 H), 3.28 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.5, 11.0 Hz), 3.23 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.5, 10.0 Hz), 2.67 (t, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 2.46 (t, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 1.23 (d, 1 H, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.03 (d, 1 H, J = 6.5 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.19, 143.15, 143.11, 143.04, 143.07, 138.5, 138.4, 138.1, 138.0, 137.6, 136.1, 133.5, 133.1, 129.2, 129.0, 128.66, 128.63, 128.6, 128.5, 128.45, 128.41, 128.39, 128.35, 128.2, 128.12, 128.09, 127.98, 127.90, 127.8, 126.6, 126.44, 126.38, 126.3, 126.0, 125.9, 125.82, 125.77, 109.6, 109.3, 102.5 (JC1–H1 = 161.8 Hz), 102.4 (JC1–H1 = 160.5 Hz), 101.6, 101.1, 98.1 (JC1–H1 = 172.3 Hz), 93.9 (JC1–H1 = 168.7 Hz) 81.0, 80.3, 79.2, 79.1, 78.96, 78.92, 77.9, 77.7, 76.5, 76.4, 75.6, 75.1, 74.9, 74.5, 74.0, 73.9, 73.5, 72.2, 69.6, 69.4, 69.1, 68.7, 65.0, 64.6, 55.2, 17.9, 17.5; ESI-HRMS m/z: calcd for C106H104O21Na, 1735.6968 [M+Na+]; Found 1735.7017.
Methyl d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (22)
To a solution of tetrasaccharide 21 (37.5 mg, 22 µmol) in 4/4/1 MeOH/THF/H2O (4.5 mL) was added AcOH (13.0 µL, 227 µmol) and 10% Pd/C (84.6 mg). The mixture was purged with H2 six times and stirred for 84 h at ambient temperature under 1 atmosphere of H2. The catalyst was filtered off, and the filtrate was concentrated. The residue was dissolved in H2O, and washed with AcOEt. The aqueous layer was concentrated to give tetrasaccharide 22 (13.2 mg, 19 µmol, 85%). [α]D 23 = − 104.0 (c 0.45, MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 4.83 (d, 1 H, J = 1.5 Hz), 4.72 (s, 1 H), 4.71 (s, 1 H), 4.55 (d, 1 H, J = 1.5 Hz), 4.13 (d, 1 H, J = 1.8 Hz), 3.94-3.83 (m, 5 H), 3.78 (dd, 1 H, J = 2.0, 4.0 Hz), 3.71-3.47 (m, 13 H), 3.30 (dd, 1 H, J = 3.0, 9.5 Hz), 3.26-3.24 (m, 4 H), 1.22 (d, 3 H, J = 6.0 Hz), 1.18 (d, 3 H, J = 6.0 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O) δ 100.98 (JC1-H1 = 172.1 Hz), 100.86 (JC1–H1 = 161.5 Hz), 100.78 (JC1–H1 = 161.3 Hz), 96.3 (JC1–H1 = 173.0 Hz), , 79.5, 79.2, 77.1, 76.2, 76.1, 73.4, 72.5, 70.8, 70.6, 70.5, 70.4, 68.3, 67.7, 67.3, 66.4, 66.2, 62.2, 54.9, 17.1; ESI-HRMS m/z: calcd for C27H48O21Na, 731.2586 [M+Na+]; Found C27H48O21Na, 731.2585.
Methyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-(diphenylmethylene)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-(diphenylmethylene)-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (23)
To a mixture of tetrasaccharide 21 (180.1 mg, 106 µmol) in 15/3/5 CH2Cl2/H2O/phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4) (15/3/5) (9.2 mL) was added DDQ (38.6 mg, 170 µmol). The mixture was stirred for 2.5 h at ambient temperature under N2, before another portion of DDQ (34.5 mg, 152 µmol) was added. After the mixture was stirred for another 2 h, it was diluted with CH2Cl2, and washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. The collected organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was subjected to silica gel chromatography to furnish alcohol 23 (123.6 mg, 79 µmol, 74%) as white foam. [α]D23 = − 96.5 (c 0.71, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.53-7.45 (m, 10 H), 7.40-7.02 (m, 40 H), 5.59 (s, 1 H), 5.58 (s, 1 H), 5.07 (s, 1 H), 5.02 (s, 1 H), 4.85 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.84 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.68 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.53-4.44 (m, 7 H), 4.41 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.5, 7.5 Hz), 4.35 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.5, 7.0 Hz), 4.09-3.99 (m, 5 H), 3.95 (t, 1 H, J = 10.0 Hz), 3.92-3.88 (m, 2 H), 3.83 (dd, 1 H, J = 3.5, 10.5 Hz), 3.81-3.64 (m, 4 H), 3.60-3.56 (m, 2 H), 3.52 (d, 1 H, J = 9.0), 3.44 (dd, 1 H, J = 1.5, 11.0 Hz), 3.41 (s, 3 H), 3.37-3.26 (m, 4 H), 2.67 (t, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 2.44 (t, 1 H, 9.5 Hz), 2.30 (d, 1 H, J = 9.0 Hz, OH), 1.23 (d, 1 H, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.03 (d, 1 H, J = 6.5 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.23, 143.19, 143.15, 143.13, 138.5, 138.4, 138.3, 138.1, 137.6, 129.2, 129.1, 128.8, 128.7, 128.62, 128.59, 128.56, 128.52, 128.49, 128.45, 128.41, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.94, 27.89, 126.7, 126.5, 126.4, 126.3, 126.0, 109.6, 109.4, 102.6, 102.2, 101.6, 98.1, 93.9, 81.1, 80.2, 79.2, 79.1, 79.03, 78.96, 78.6, 78.0, 76.6, 76.4, 75.6, 75.3, 74.9, 73.9, 73.8, 73.64, 73.60, 71.0, 69.7, 69.4, 69.1, 68.4, 64.9, 64.6, 55.3, 17.9, 17.6; ESI-HRMS m/z: calcd for C95H96O21Na, 1595.6342 [M+Na+]; Found 1595.6427.
Methyl 2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-3-O-naphthalenylmethyl)-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-(diphenylmethylene)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-(diphenylmethylene)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-2,7-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylindene-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-2,3-O-(diphenylmethylene)-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (24)
A solution of thioglycoside 20 (106.2 mg, 104 µmol) and alcohol 23 (121.6 mg, 77 µmol) in CH2Cl2 (8 mL) was stirred for 30 min in the presence of 4 Å molecular sieves at ambient temperature under N2 before it was cooled to −15 °C, and treated with NIS (29.9 mg, 133 µmol) and AgOTf (27.4 mg, 106 µmol). The resulting mixture was stirred for 1.5 h while the temperature was increased to 10 °C. The solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was washed with saturated aqueous Na2S2O3 containing NaHCO3 and brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (AcOEt/PhCH3 = 1/18) to afford hexasaccharide 24 (124.2 mg, 50 µmol, 64%). [α]D23 = − 92.0 (c 0.44, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80-7.75 (m, 3 H), 7.68-7.66 (m, 1 H), 7.57-7.09 (m, 76 H), 6.93 (t, 2 H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.69 (s, 1 H), 5.58 (s, 1 H), 5.07 (s, 1 H), 5.01 (s, 1 H), 4.88-4.81 (m, 3 H), 4.76-4.62 (m, 5 H), 4.55-4.42 (m, 8 H), 4.38-4.34 (m 3 H), 4.30-4.26 (m, 3 H), 4.15-4.01 (m, 7 H), 3.98-3.82 (m, 8 H), 3.74-3.65 (m, 2 H), 3.51-3.33 (m, 9 H), 3.30-3.25 (m, 3 H), 3.18 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.5, 10.0 Hz), 2.67 (t, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 2.48 (t, 1 H, J = 9.0 Hz), 2.42 (t, 1 H, J = 9.5 Hz), 1.23 (d, 3 H, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.04 (d, 3 H, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.00 (d, 3 H, J = 6.5 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.22, 143.18, 143.12, 143.08, 138.6, 138.5, 138.4, 138.06, 137.98, 137.8, 137.63, 137.60, 136.1, 133.5, 133.2, 129.2, 129.1, 129.0, 128.7, 128.65, 128.60, 128.53, 128.5, 128.45, 128.41, 128.4, 128.33, 128.30, 128.27, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.86, 127.84, 126.6, 126.5, 126.4, 126.3, 126.04, 125.98, 125.83, 125.79, 109.6, 109.5, 109.3, 102.6, 102.5, 102.4, 101.7, 101.6, 101.1, 98.1 (JC1–H1 = 169.5 Hz), 93.86 (JC1–H1 = 168.5 Hz), 93.79 (JC1–H1 = 167.0 Hz), 81.2, 80.5, 80.3, 79.2, 79.1, 79.0, 78.9, 77.9, 77.7, 76.6, 76.5, 76.4, 75.6, 75.1, 74.9, 74.5, 74.3, 73.9, 73.8, 73.7, 73.65, 73.62, 73.55, 72.9, 72.2, 69.7, 69.6, 69.4, 69.2, 69.1, 68.8, 64.9, 64.6, 55.3, 17.9, 17.5; ESI-HRMS m/z: calcd for C153H150O31Na, 2506.0059 [M+Na+]; Found 2506.0273.
Methyl d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-d-glycero-β-d-manno-heptopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-l-rhamnopyranoside (25)
To a solution of hexasaccharide 24 (58.3 mg, 23 µmol) in 3/1 MeOH/THF (6 mL) was added AcOH (100 µL, 1.7 mmol) and 10% Pd/C (100 mg). The mixture was purged with H2 six times, and stirred for 24 h under H2 at 50 psi. The solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was concentrated to dryness. The resulting residue was dissolved in water, and washed with CHCl3 (5 mL × 3). The aqueous phase was concentrated under reduced pressure, and dried under vacuum to afford hexamer 25 (14.9 mg, 14 µmol, 60%). [α]D23 = −84.6 (c 0.71, H2O); 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O, 330 K, referenced to an external standard sodium 3-trimethylsilyl-(2,2,3,3-2H) propionate (δ = 0.00) in D2O) δ 4.96 (s, 2 H), 4.84 (s, 2 H), 4.83 (s, 1 H), 4.68 (s, 1 H), 4.24 (br. s, 2 H), 4.05-3.96 (m, 8 H), 3.92-3.90 (m, 1 H), 3.83-3.60 (m, 19 H), 3.44-3.41 (m, 2 H), 3.38-3.35 (m, 4 H), 1.33 (d, 3 H, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.31 (d, 6 H, J = 6.5 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O, 330 K, referenced to an external standard 1,4-dioxane (δ = 67.40) in D2O) δ 101.63 (JC1–H1 = 174.5 Hz), 101.48 (JC1–H1 = 160.5 Hz), 101.36 (JC1–H1 = 161.4 Hz), 97.09 (JC1–H1 = 170.2 Hz), 80.27, 80.10, 77.99, 76.84, 76.71, 74.08, 73.29, 73.25, 71.52, 71.28, 71.17, 69.10, 68.34, 67.92, 67.29, 67.14, 63.03, 62.98, 55.59, 17.78; ESI-HRMS m/z: calcd for C40H70O31Na, 1069.3799 [M+Na+]; Found 1069.3762; calcd for C40H70O31Na2, 546.1848 [M+2Na2+], Found, 546.1837.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
We thank the NIH (GM57335) for support of this work.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Comparison of spectral data of glycan 25 with that of the natural isolate, and copies of spectra of all compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.(a) Kosma P, Wugeditsch T, Christian R, Zayni S, Messner P. Glycobiology. 1995;5:791–796. doi: 10.1093/glycob/5.8.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kosma P, Wugeditsch T, Christian R, Zayni S, Messner P. Glycobiology. 1996;6:5–5. doi: 10.1093/glycob/5.8.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Crich D, Banerjee A. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1935–1938. doi: 10.1021/ol050224s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Crich D, Banerjee A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:8078–8086. doi: 10.1021/ja061594u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.For reviews expounding the difficulties of β-mannoside synthesis and presenting classical and indirect solutions to the problem see Barresi F, Hindsgaul O. In: Modern Methods in Carbohydrate Synthesis. Khan SH, O'Neill RA, editors. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1996. pp. 251–276. Demchenko AV. Synlett. 2003:1225–1240. Pozsgay V. In: Carbohydrates in Chemistry and Biology. Ernst B, Hart GW, Sinaÿ P, editors. Vol. 1. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2000. pp. 319–343. Gridley JJ, Osborn HMI. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.1. 2000:1471–1491. Ito Y, Ohnishi Y. In: Glycoscience: Chemistry and Chemical Biology. Fraser-Reid B, Tatsuta K, Thiem J, editors. Vol. 2. Springer; 2001. pp. 1589–1619.
- 5.For the direct approach to β-mannopyranoside synthesis and it’s mechanism see Crich D, Sun S. J. Org. Chem. 1997;62:1198–1199. Crich D, Sun S. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:8321–8348. Crich D, Smith M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:9015–9020. doi: 10.1021/ja0111481. Crich D, Banerjee A, Li W, Yao Q. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2005. 24:415–424. doi: 10.1081/CAR-200066978. Crich D, Sun S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:11217–11223. Crich D, Chandrasekera NS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43:5386–5389. doi: 10.1002/anie.200453688. Jensen HH, Nordstrom M, Bols M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:9205–9213. doi: 10.1021/ja047578j.
- 6.Jaipuri FA, Collet BYM, Pohl NL. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:1707–1710. doi: 10.1002/anie.200704262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ley SV, Baeschlin DK, Dixon DJ, Foster AC, Ince SJ, Priepke HWM, Reynolds DJ. Chem. Rev. 2001;101:53–80. doi: 10.1021/cr990101j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crich D, Cai W, Dai Z. J. Org. Chem. 2000;65:1291–1297. doi: 10.1021/jo9910482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Regioselective monobenzylation of the 2-methoxyphenyl thioglycoside analog of Ley SV, Humphries AC, Eick H, Downham R, Ross AR, Boyce RJ, Pavey JBJ, Pietruszka J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1. 1998:3907–3912.
- 10.The regioselectivity of the benzylation reaction was assigned according to the work of Ley with a direct analog,9 and was confirmed by the subsequent reaction sequence
- 11.Shi M, Shen Y-MJ. J. Chem. Res. (S) 2002:422–427. [Google Scholar]
- 12.The stereochemistry of diols 6 and 8 can be determined based on comparison of the double doublet representing H5 with literature values. Thus, the l,d-series (8) has a the smaller 3J5,6 of 2.0Hz when compared to the 3J5,6 coupling of 6.0 Hz observed in the D,D-series (6). In addition the 6-and 7-OH signals for 6 resonate downfield (δ 3.16 and 2.20, respectively) relative to those for 8 (δ 2.66 and 1.85, respectively) Read JA, Ahmed RA, Tanner ME. Org. Lett. 2005;7:2457–2460. doi: 10.1021/ol050774q.
- 13.(a) Denmark SE, Cottell JJ. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:4276–4284. doi: 10.1021/jo0101510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Guzlek H, Graziani A, Kosma P. Carbohydr. Res. 2005;340:2808–2811. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Dong L, Roosenberg JM, Miller MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:15001–15005. doi: 10.1021/ja028386w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Gurjar MK, Talukdar A. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:3267–3271. [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Kaldor SW, Hammond M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991;32:5043–5046. [Google Scholar]; (b) Aucagne V, Tatibouet A, Rollin P. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:1817–1826. [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) David S, Hanessian S. Tetrahedron. 1985;41:643–663. [Google Scholar]; (b) David S. In: Preparative Carbohydrate Chemistry. Hanessian S, editor. New York: Dekker; 1997. pp. 69–86. [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Mitsunobu O. Synthesis. 1981:1–28. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hughes DL. Org. React. 1992;42:335–656. [Google Scholar]; (c) Martin SF, Dodge JA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991;32:3017–3020. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adapted from Crich D, Vinogradova O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:11756–11765. doi: 10.1021/ja0730258. Lattrell R, Lohaus G. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1974:901–920. Moriarty RM, Zhuang H, Penmasta R, Liu K, Awasthi AK, Tuladhar SM, Rao MSC, Singh VK. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34:8029–8032. Binkley RWJ. Org. Chem. 1991;56:3892–3896. Binkley RWJ. Carbohydr. Chem. 1994;13:111–123. Dong H, Pei Z, Ramstroem O. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:3306–3309. doi: 10.1021/jo052662i. Albert R, Dax K, Link RW, Stuetz AE. Carbohydr. Res. 1983;118:C5–C6.
- 18.(a) Xia J, Abbas SA, Locke RD, Piskorz CF, L AJ, Matta KL. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:169–173. [Google Scholar]; (b) Liao W, D LR, Matta KL. Chem. Commun. 2000:369–370. [Google Scholar]; (c) Csávás M, Szabó ZB, Borbás A, Lipták A. In: Handbook of Reagents for Organic Synthesis: Reagents for Glycoside, Nucleotide, and Peptide Synthesis. Crich D, editor. Chichester: Wiley; 2005. pp. 459–460. [Google Scholar]
- 19.(a) Borbás A, Hajkó J, Kajtár-Peredy M, Lipták A, Lipták A. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1993;12:191–200. [Google Scholar]; (b) Borbás A. Carbohydr. Res. 1993;241:99. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(93)80099-z. 116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hajkó J, Borbás A, Szabovik G, Kajtár-Peredy M, Lipták A. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1997;16:1123–1144. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Crich D, Cai F, Yang F. Carbohydr. Res. 2008;343:1858–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Crich D, Sun S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:435–436. [Google Scholar]
- 22.(a) Bock K, Pedersen C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1974:293–297. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tvaroska I, Taravel FR. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1995;51:15–61. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2318(08)60191-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Duus JO, Godfredsen CH, Bock K. Chem. Rev. 2000;100:4589–4614. doi: 10.1021/cr990302n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tatsuta K, Akimoto K, Annaka M, Ohno Y, Kinoshita M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985;58:1699–1706. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Irurre J, Alonso-Alija C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1992;3:1591–1596. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Groneberg RD, Miyazaki T, Stylianides NA, Schulze TJ, Stahl W, Schreiner EP, Suzuki T, Iwabuchi Y, Smith AL, Nicolaou KC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;17:7593–7611. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









