Abstract
The causal mechanism underlying the well-established relation between advancing paternal age and schizophrenia is hypothesized to involve mutational errors during spermatogenesis that occur with increasing frequency as males age. Point mutations are well known to increase with advancing paternal age while other errors such as altered copy number in repeat DNA and chromosome breakage have in some cases also been associated with advancing paternal age. Dysregulation of epigenetic processes may also be an important mechanism underlying the association between paternal age and schizophrenia. Evidence suggests that advancing age as well as environmental exposures alter epigenetic regulation. Errors in epigenetic processes, such as parental imprinting can have serious effects on the offspring both pre- and postnatally and into adulthood. This article will discuss parental imprinting on the autosomal and X chromosomes and the alterations in epigenetic regulation that may lead to such errors.
Keywords: methylation, imprinting, X-chromosome inactivation, schizophrenia
Advancing Paternal Age and Schizophrenia
Although a relationship between paternal age and schizophrenia has been investigated intermittently since the 1950s,1 only in the past decade has a clear link between the 2 been established and sources of confounding ruled out. In 2001, Malaspina et al2 showed that the incidence of schizophrenia increased progressively with increasing paternal age, the risk being 2-fold and 3-fold for offspring of fathers aged 45–49 and 50 or more years, compared with those of fathers aged less than 25 years. That seminal work was based on a study in a large prospective cohort. Nine of 10 investigations, published in 8 articles3–10 as well as a meta-analysis,11 have confirmed the original finding. Together, these studies demonstrated that the effect of paternal age on risk of schizophrenia was not explained by a variety of factors such as family history, maternal age, parental education and social ability, family social integration, social class, birth order, birth weight, and birth complications. Other evidence points to a role for paternal age in learning and cognition. Offspring of older rodents showed deficits in learning compared with those of younger fathers.12 In humans, the incidence of autism was increased nearly 6-fold in offspring of fathers in their 40s and 50s compared with those of fathers aged up to 30 years.13 IQ was reduced in the offspring of older fathers, independently of effects of maternal age.14 In another study, paternal age greater than 40 years was associated with an increased likelihood that the offspring would be placed in special education tracks in school.15
A question arose as to whether effects of paternal age on schizophrenia might be explained by psychiatric problems that might delay childbearing in the parents and be inherited by their offspring. For this to be true, we would anticipate paternal age effects to be stronger in familial cases than in sporadic ones. In studies that examined whether the relation between paternal age and schizophrenia was modified by family history,6–9 one actually observed the reverse effect7 while the others did not observe any modification of the relation by family history.6,8,9
The Effects of Advancing Paternal Age on Spermatogenesis
Spermatogonial stem cells are constantly dividing and undergo hundreds of replications during the lifetime.16 Crow17 proposed that there is a higher frequency of point mutations in males, the frequency of which increases with age. In fact, paternal age has been associated with birth defects in several studies.18–20 Other forms of mutation, eg, altered copy number in repeat DNA, and chromosome breakage, also occur in the male germline and in some cases have been related to male aging.21–23 Paternal age may then be, in part, a marker for genetic alterations that occur during spermatogenesis in older men underlying the association between paternal age and schizophrenia. In addition to genetic changes, aberrant epigenetic regulation, the subject of this article, may also underlie the association between advancing paternal age and schizophrenia.
Aberrant Epigenetic Regulation
Epigenetic processes lead to heritable changes in gene expression through DNA methylation and demethylation and changes in chromatin structure, rather than changes in DNA sequence; methylation of genes silences them preventing transcription while demethylation allows transcription. An epigenetic process of interest in schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders is parental imprinting.
There are approximately 70 autosomal loci known to be parentally imprinted, and others are suspected on the sex chromosomes.24 Imprinted genes play a critical role in growth of the placenta and fetus and central nervous system.24–26 Genes are differentially marked during gametogenesis after the methylation patterns of the previous generation are “erased” and the new parent of origin-specific methylation and additional changes in chromatin are established.27,28 This differential marking silences or imprints the maternal or paternal allele. Imprinted genes generally occur in large clusters29 containing both maternally and paternally imprinted genes. A gene that is imprinted in some tissues may not be imprinted in other tissues; in the brain, it is thought that imprinting may even be cell specific and differ according to the stage of development.24
Errors associated with imprinting can occur during imprint erasure, establishment, and maintenance. Loss of imprinting whereby the epigenetic mark is not established or erased can result in partial or complete biallelic expression of a gene. For instance, loss of imprinting of the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) gene has been linked to both Beckwidth-Wiedeman syndrome30 and colorectal neoplasia.31 In Angelman syndrome and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) there are errors in imprinting the correct parental chromosome.32 This failure to correctly imprint in some cases has been attributed to a microdeletion in the imprinting center of 15q11–13,33 while in other cases, it has been attributed to a primary epimutation which can occur during erasure, establishment, or maintenance of the imprint.32 Though both these syndromes are associated with behavioral, cognitive, and neurologic impairment, in the case of PWS, 5%–10% of cases experience schizophrenia-like psychotic symptoms.34 Interestingly, the chromosomal region involved in these syndromes lies adjacent to a region, 15q13–14, which has been linked to schizophrenia in many but not all studies.35 Imprinting errors could increase the risk of schizophrenia through multiple pathways including direct effects on the expression of genes involved in neuropsychiatric pathology or indirectly through imprinting errors in genes related to the normal functioning of the placenta.
X-chromosome Inactivation
X-chromosome inactivation is a special form of epigenetic silencing. Females receive the X chromosome of both parents while males receive only the maternal X chromosome. To maintain dosage compensation in females, 1 X chromosome is randomly silenced by a nontranslating RNA called the X inactive–specific transcript36 and other changes resulting in a 50:50 mosaic of cells with the paternal or maternal X chromosome inactivated. Deviations from this norm are common37–39 and more than 15% of genes on the inactivated X chromosome escape silencing.40 Parent of origin effects suggested the presence of imprinted genes on the X chromosome in a study of the sporadic disorder, Turner syndrome. Turner syndrome is characterized by complete or partial loss of the paternal or maternal X chromosome. Skuse et al41 reported that females who had only the paternal X chromosome had better verbal skills and higher executive functioning than females who had only the maternal X chromosome. In addition to providing support for the presence of imprinted genes on the X chromosome, these results also supported the hypothesis that imprinted genes reside on the X chromosome related to cognition and behavior. Kesler et al42 found that there were differences in brain morphology between Turner syndrome patients who inherit the paternal versus a maternal X chromosome. Imprinted genes on the X chromosome have been posited as one of several explanations for sex differences in neuropsychiatric disorders.43
Effects of Aging and Environmental Exposures on Epigenetic Processes
Though epigenetic traits are generally stably inherited through numerous cell divisions, over time, epigenetic errors do occur in somatic cells. The frequency appears to increase with age and thought to be more frequent than mutations.44 In mice, epigenetic loss of repression of a gene was reported in older mice compared with younger mice.44 In humans, a study observed that young monozygotic twins were virtually identical on measures of 5-methylcytosine DNA and histone acetylation, whereas in older twins, the differences in these measures were often fairly striking.45 These differences in older twins might have occurred independently of or in concert with exogenous exposures.46 These findings suggest that epigenetic regulation in the rapidly dividing spermatogonia cells may also be disrupted as a consequence of aging or as an accumulation of exogenous or endogenous exposures over time. In fact, it was recently reported that there were changes in chromatin packaging and integrity in spermatozoal cells in older rats compared with younger rats,47 while investigators from China reported that older paternal age was associated with a loss of imprinting of IGF2, a maternally imprinted gene, in cord blood.48
DNA Methyltransferases
There are a number of different DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) that differ in whether they initiate or sustain methylation and are more active at certain times in development but less during others.49 In aging fibroblast cell lines, there is a progressive loss of a maintenance DNMT1 and an increase in one of the de novo DNMTs.50 It has been observed in mouse testis that DNMTs levels peak postnatally and decrease to steady adult levels about a month later51; it is possible that some DNMTs levels could decrease and others could increase with aging. Altered levels of the DNMTs in older men could contribute to the disruption of epigenetic processes affecting the erasure, establishment, and maintenance of paternal imprints during spermatogenesis and after fertilization. Environmental exposures over the course of males' lifetime may also cause defective epigenetic regulation. Several environmental exposures, eg, arsenic and nickel are associated with epigenetic changes,52,53 and exposure to these and other toxins may affect spermatogenesis. One study reported that early embryos of male rats chronically exposed to a chemotherapy drug, cyclophosphamide, had defects in epigenetic programming.54
Conclusion
Advancing paternal age may be a marker of epigenetic dysregulation leading to errors in imprinting and other epigenetic processes, the consequence of which may be a susceptibility to schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders in the offspring. Interest in the epigenetic origins of neuropsychiatric disease has concomitantly increased with the mounting evidence of the importance of paternal age as a risk factor in schizophrenia and other disease outcomes. Currently, there are more questions than answers, providing opportunities for translational research across many disciplines.
Funding
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH59114 to D.M., 2K24 MH01699 to D.M., 1R01 MH 63264 to A.S.B., 1K02 MH 65422 to A.S.B., 1R01 MH 60249 to A.S.B., 1R01 MH 073080 to A.S.B.); National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) Independent Investigator Award (to A.S.B.). National Cancer Institue (ROI CA 80197 for MCP).
References
- 1.Johansen E. A study of schizophrenia in the male. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1958;9(suppl 125):33. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Malaspina D, Harlap S, Fennig S, et al. Advancing paternal age and the risk of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:361–367. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.4.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown AS, Schaefer CA, Wyatt RJ, et al. Paternal age and risk of schizophrenia in adult offspring. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1528–1533. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Byrne M, Agerbo E, Ewald H, Eaton WW, Mortensen PB. Parental age and risk of schizophrenia: a case-control study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:673–678. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dalman C, Allebeck P. Paternal age and schizophrenia: further support for an association. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1591–1592. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zammit S, Allebeck P, Dalman C, et al. Paternal age and risk for schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:405–408. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.5.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sipos A, Rasmussen F, Harrison G, et al. Paternal age and schizophrenia: a population based cohort study. BMJ. 2004;329:1070. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38243.672396.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.El-Saadi O, Pedersen CB, McNeil TF, et al. Paternal and maternal age as risk factors for psychosis: findings from Denmark, Sweden and Australia. Schizophr Res. 2004;67:227–236. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00100-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tsuchiya KJ, Takagai S, Kawai M, et al. Advanced paternal age associated with an elevated risk for schizophrenia in offspring in a Japanese population. Schizophr Res. 2005;76:337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rasmussen F. Paternal age, size at birth, and size in young adulthood—risk factors for schizophrenia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;155(suppl 1):S65–S69. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wohl M, Gorwood P. Paternal ages below or above 35 years old are associated with a different risk of schizophrenia in the offspring. Eur Psychiatry. 2007;22:22–26. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Auroux M. Decrease of learning capacity in offspring with increasing paternal age in the rat. Teratology. 1983;27:141–148. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420270202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reichenberg A, Gross R, Weiser M, et al. Advancing paternal age and autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:1026–1032. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.9.1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Malaspina D, Reichenberg A, Weiser M, et al. Paternal age and intelligence: implications for age-related genomic changes in male germ cells. Psychiatr Genet. 2005;15:117–125. doi: 10.1097/00041444-200506000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mannerkoski MK, Aberg LE, Autti TH, Hoikkala M, Sarna S, Heiskala HJ. Newborns at risk for special education placement: a population-based study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2007;11(4):223–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics. 1998;148:1667–1686. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Crow JF. Spontaneous mutation in man. Mutat Res. 1999;437:5–9. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(99)00063-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lian ZH, Zack MM, Erickson JD. Paternal age and the occurrence of birth defects. Am J Hum Genet. 1986;39:648–660. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Olshan AF, Schnitzer PG, Baird PA. Paternal age and the risk of congenital heart defects. Teratology. 1994;50:80–84. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420500111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McIntosh GC, Olshan AF, Baird PA. Paternal age and the risk of birth defects in offspring. Epidemiology. 1995;6:282–288. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199505000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ellegren H. Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet. 2000;16:551–558. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02139-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Andreassen R, Lundsted J, Olaisen B. Mutation at minisatellite locus DYF155S1: allele length mutation rate is affected by age of progenitor. Electrophoresis. 2002;23:2377–2383. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(200208)23:15<2377::AID-ELPS2377>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singh NP, Muller CH, Berger RE. Effects of age on DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in human sperm. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1420–1430. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Davies W, Isles AR, Wilkinson LS. Imprinted gene expression in the brain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29:421–430. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fowden AL, Sibley C, Reik W, Constancia M. Imprinted genes and placental development and fetal growth. Horm Res. 2006;65:50–58. doi: 10.1159/000091506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tycko B, Morison IM. Physiological functions of imprinted genes. J Cell Physiol. 2002;192:245–258. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ferguson-smith AC, Surani MA. Imprinting and the epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes. Science. 2001;293:1086–1089. doi: 10.1126/science.1064020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jiang YH, Bressler J, Beaudet AL. Epigenetics and human disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2004;5:479–510. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.5.061903.180014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Verona RI, Mann MR, Bartolmei MS. Genomic imprinting: intricacies of epigenetic regulation in clusters. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003;19:237–259. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111401.092717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Walter J, Paulsen M. Imprinting and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2003;14:101–110. doi: 10.1016/s1084-9521(02)00142-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cruz-Correa M, Cui H, Giardiello FM, et al. Loss of imprinting of insulin-like growth factor II gene: a potential heritable biomarker for colon neoplasia predisposition. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:964–970. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Horsthemke B, Buiting K. Imprinting defects on human chromosome 15. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;113:292–299. doi: 10.1159/000090844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Buiting K, Gross S, Lich C, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, el-Maarri O, Horsthemke B. Epimutations in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes: a molecular study of 136 patients with an imprinting defect. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:571–577. doi: 10.1086/367926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Davies W, Isles AR, Wilkinson LS. Imprinted genes and mental dysfunction. Ann Med. 2001;33:428–436. doi: 10.3109/07853890108995956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Leonard S, Freedman R. Genetics of chromosome 15q13-q14 in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lyon MF. X-chromosome inactivation and human genetic disease. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2002;91:107–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2002.tb03120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lanasa MC, Hogge WA, Kubik C, Biancato J, Hoffman EP. Highly skewed X-chromosome inactivation is associated with idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:252–254. doi: 10.1086/302441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kristiansen M, Helland A, Kristiansen GB. X chromosome inactivation in cervical cancer patients. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;146:73–76. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(03)00152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim JW, Park SY, Kim YM, Kim JM, Ryu HM. X-chromosome inactivation patterns in Korean women with idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;19:259–262. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.2.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brown CJ, Greally JM. A stain upon the silence: genes escaping X-inactivation. Trends Genet. 2003;19:432–438. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00177-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Skuse DH, James RS, Bishop DVM, et al. Evidence from Turner's syndrome of an imprinted X-linked locus affecting cognitive function. Nature. 1997;387:705–708. doi: 10.1038/42706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kesler SR, Blasey CM, Brown WE, et al. Effects of X-monosomy and X-linked imprinting on superior temporal gyrus morphology in Turner syndrome. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:636–646. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00289-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Davies W, Isles AR, Burgoyne PS, Wilkinson LS. X-linked imprinting: effects on brain and behaviour. Bioessays. 2006;28:35–44. doi: 10.1002/bies.20341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bennett-Baker PE, WIlkowski J, Burke DT. Age-associated activation of epigenetically repressed genes in the mouse. Genetics. 2003;165:2055–2062. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10604–10609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500398102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Martin GM. Epigenetic drift in aging identical twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10413–10414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504743102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zubkova EV, Robaire B. Effects of ageing on spermatozoal chromatin and its sensitivity to in vivo and in vitro oxidative challenge in the Brown Norway rat. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2901–2910. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dai YM, Hu YL, Wang ZQ, Li J. Loss of imprinting of IGF2 in cord blood of newborns of Chinese Han population. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2007;24:10–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Siedlecki P, Zielenkiewicz P. Mammalian DNA methyltransferases. Acta Biochim Pol. 2006;53:245–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lopatino N, Haskell JF, Andrews LG, Poole JC, Saldanha S, Tollefsbol T. Differential maintenance and de novo methylating activity by three DNA methyltransferases in agin and immortalized fibroblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2002;84:324–334. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Benoit G, Trasler JM. Developmental expression of DNA methyltransferases messenger ribonucleic acid protein and enzyme activity in the mouse testis. Biol Reprod. 1994;50:1312–1319. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod50.6.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Costa M, Davidson TL, Chen H, et al. Nickel carcinogenesis: epigenetics and hypoxia signalling. Mutat Res. 2005;592:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Reichard JF, Schnekenburger M, Puga A. Long term low-dose arsenic exposure induces loss of DNA methylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;352:188–192. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Barton S, Robaire B, Hales BF. Epigenetic programming in the preimplantation rat embryo is disrupted by chronic paternal cyclophosphamide exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7865–7870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501200102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]