Abstract
Fracture repair has not been fully optimised and there is opportunity to increase the healing rate and reduce the number of complications using pharmacological means. While most anti-osteoporosis drugs have been widely tested for their ability to decrease the risk of osteoporotic fractures, fragility fractures still occur in patients under medical intervention. The primary purpose of this systematic review is to understand these underlying mechanisms between bone and drug therapies in osteoporosis and the overall promotion of fracture healing and callus formation. Databases such as MEDLINE, Google Scholar, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched and nine articles met all inclusion criteria. We report that there is still large controversy and a need for clinical trials to address the deficiencies found in animal models. There is no clear evidence yet as to whether complications during the course of healing are attributable to implant anchorage problems in osteoporotic bone or to possibly delayed healing in the aged.
Keywords: fracture, healing, osteoporosis, drug therapies, callus formation, elderly.
Introduction
Fracture repair involves the proliferation and differentiation of several tissue types in a sequence, followed by remodelling.
Drugs could potentially influence all these processes. Some drugs can have an effect on the proliferation of early callus, while others affect the differentiation of chondrocytes or osteoblasts, capillary formation or sensitivity to mechanical input. Because the repair of fractures has not been fully optimised, it is possible to enhance it using pharmacological or other means such as ultrasound or electromagnetism (1-3). Noninvasive methods in fracture treatment such as systemic injections have also been examined such as L-dopa which has been reported to enhance early fracture healing and nonunions (4, 5). The interaction between drugs and fracture healing and its effect on callus formation are still issues of debate. A preliminary report on the effects of daily subcutaneous injections of parathyroid hormone in a rat closed fracture model showed an increase in callus area and strength and histological analysis resulted in the amount of new bone (6). This is an emerging field as several pharmaceutical companies are currently working on new principles for stimulation of fracture repair, which would in turn reduce clinical and socioeconomic problems associated with fracture healing.
Most anti-osteoporosis drugs have the ability to decrease the risk of osteoporotic fractures; however, fragility fractures still occur in patients under medical intervention. For this reason, the safety and efficacy of most anti-osteoporosis drugs for fracture healing have been evaluated in order to decide whether they should be ceased or continued after fracture. It is expected that the anti-osteoporosis drugs have the ability to promote fracture healing at the same time. The primary purpose of this systematic review of the current literature is to tease out these subtleties between drugs and fracture healing and evaluate the potential for non-invasive methods to enhance fracture repair and callus formation in the aged with osteoporosis.
Methods
A literature search was conducted by a librarian using a keyword search with terms such as “osteoporosis” and in combination with “fragility fractures” and “callus formation” or “bony callus.” The search was limited to articles concerning controlled in vivo and clinical trials that used pharmaceutical therapies in order to modify fracture healing. This way pharmaceutical therapies were considered a therapeutic intervention in prospective cohort studies using models linked (directly or indirectly) with non-unions and not as a diagnostic or prognostic tool for prospective or retrospective studies. In other words, all the selected studies evaluated the direct use of pharmaceutical therapies administered in various ways, for fracture healing alone or in combination with other substances or growth factors.
Exclusion criteria were set and the following were included: articles using language other than English, articles that were not experimental controlled trials (reviews, letters, and expert opinion publications). Furthermore, this search focused only on osteoporosis and thus excluded other mechanisms of bone metabolism such as distraction osteogenesis, and osteonecrosis.
We excluded, cytostatics, antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones and corticosteroids and Cox inhibitors (NSAIDS) as these are known to impair fracture healing and is beyond the scope of the present systematic review. Articles that conformed to our criteria were retrieved and then all the articles related to these were searched.
Results
A total of 3, 680 hits were found across different database searches such as Medline from 1996 to 2009 (Week 1), Google Scholar, Pubmed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. In total 57 articles were selected and retrieved in full. Finally, nine articles were selected by two reviewers who judged the articles on meeting the inclusion criteria (Table I).
Table I.
Author (last name, year) | Study design | Sample size | Intervention type | Drug administration type | Conclusions | Callus formation (+/-) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
McDonald M.,et al. 2008 Amanat N.,et al. 2008 | Animalstudy | Wistar rats (n=272 male) | A 1.1 mm Kirschner wire was inserted into the medullary canal of the femur | Control Group: weekly subcutaneous injections of saline (1 ml/kg). Zoledronic Acid (ZA) Single Bolus ZA Group: subcutaneously ZA 1 week post fracture (0,1 mg/kg) Weekly ZA dose Group: 5 doses at 0.02 mg/kg/week | At 6 weeks: both ZA treatment groups fracture callus peak increased, 20% for bolus ZA, 31% for weekly ZA. At week 26: callus peak torque increased with ZA treatment to the saline (88% bolus ZA, 96% weekly ZA) | Increased |
Morgan E.F., et al. 2008 | Animal study | New Zealand rabbits (n=64 female) | Partial thickness osteotomy was created in the lateral left distal tibial metaphysic and filled with Tricalcium phosphate (TCP). | 4 groups: 1) BMP-7 and PTH, 2) BMP-7, 3) PTH, and control. | Combined treatment with rhBMP-7 and PTH enhanced healing through improvements in callus structure, organization, and mechanical function. The combined treatment resulted in higher torsional rigidity, higher strength, and more extensive bone formation both within the surrounding tissues and in the defect as compared to the control group. | Decreased |
Holstain JH., et al.2008 | Animal study | 38 SKH1-Hr mice (30-40 g body weight) | The right femur of each animal was fractured by a 3- point bending device and stabilized using a locking nail. | Daily intraperitoneal (i.p. injection of rapamycin from the day of fracture | At 5 weeks rapamycintreated animals revealed an increase in callus diameter, whereas the size of the callus in vehicletreated controls was found decreased at this late time point. Thus, the difference in callus formation between the two groups observed at 2 weeks had disappeared by 5 weeks | Delayed |
Wang JW., et al. 2007 | Animal study | 130 2-month-old female Sprague- Dawley rats with initial body weight of 178-201 g. All the rats were randomly subjected to either OVX (n=120) or sham surgery (n=10). | All the OVX rats were used to establish open fracture models and fixed with intermedullary nails. Transverse open fracture model was made in the proximal one-third of the right tibia. | Simvastatin or vehicle drugs were injected subcutaneously to the fracture site once on the day of fracture and twice in 5 days thereafter. A solution of 5% simvastatin (Hisun Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. China) simvastatin was diffused in PBS with 2 dimethylsulfoxide and 0.1% BSA. Each injection contained 5 mg/kg simvastatin of the SVS group and an equal volume (about 30 μl-50 μl) of vehicle solution to the vehicle groups. | Substantial histological differences between the OVX + vehicle and OVX + SVS callus zones were visible at 1 and 2 weeks after treatment. The callus cross-section area in simvastatin-treated rats was significantly enlarged by 21.3% at 1 week (20.22±3.42 mm2 vs. 16.67±4.02 mm2) and by 21.5% at 2 weeks (23.63±3.25 mm2 vs. 19.45±3.19 mm2) than the vehicle group | Increased |
Moroni A., et al. 2007 | Clinical study | 16 female patients with a pertrochanteric fracture in osteoporotic bone. | Fractures were fixed with a pertrochanteric fixator and four 6/5- mm-diameter hydroxyapatitecoated tapered pins | Group A patients: 70-mg oral ALN dose/wk Group B: Control or no therapy | The combined mean extraction torque (and standard deviation) of the pins implanted at positions 1 and 2 (cancellous bone) was 2558 ± 1103 N/mm in Group A and 1171 ± 480 N/mm in Group B. The combined mean extraction torque of the pins implanted at positions 3 and 4 (cortical bone) was 4327 ± 1720 N/mm in Group A and 4075 ± 1022 N/mm in Group B. Weekly systemic administration of alendronate improves pin fixation in cancellous bone in elderly female patients with osteoporosis. We observed a twofold increase in extraction torque with the pins implanted in cancellous bone. | Increased |
Cebesoy O., et al. 2007 | Animal study | Forty-two male Wistar rats randomized into two groups | Left tibiae of all animals were broken in closed manner using a manual threepoint bending technique through mid-tibia .The fractures were not stabilized internally. External stabilization was done with the use of a cast. The animals in each group were further divided into smaller groups (three rats in each) and put to separate cages. They were exposed to light and dark in periods of 12:12 h without any restriction of mobilization. | Group 1 = 450 mg/kg Strontium Ranelate (SR) starting from the first postoperative day. Group 2 = Control. The animals were sacrificed on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th post-operative week (each week 7 animals were sacrificed) and the broken tibiae were removed. | Radiological analysis: No significant difference was found in callus formation and bone union. Histopathological analysis: fractures healed normally in both groups as weeks advanced. However, when both groups were compared, no significant difference was found in terms of fracture healing. | No significant differences |
Kakar S., et al. 2007 | Animal study | C57BL/6 mice (male) | Closed unilateral femoral fractures (right) | Daily systemic injections of saline (control) or 30 micro gr/kg PTH for 14 days after fracture | Fixation and standard histological analysis: visible increase in callus size and apparent bone density by day 14 and approaching bridging by day 21 in response to PTH. PTHmediate enhancement of fracture repair is primarily associated with an amplification of chondrocyte recruitment and maturation in the earliy fracture callus | Increased |
Meyer Ra., et al. 2003 | Animal study | Female Sprague- Dawley rats | Closed midshaft femoral fractures were created in sixweek- old and one-year-old, and killed at zero-time (unfractured) or at 0.4, one, two, three, four, or six weeks after the fracture. mRNA levels were measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in the fracture callus for twenty-seven matrix, cytokine, and cytokine-receptor genes for the seven animals per timepoint per age-group. | BMP-2 | All genes studied were upregulated by the fracture in both age-groups. Thus, the failure of the older rats to heal promptly was not due to the lack of expression of any of the studied genes. The increase in mRNA for Ihh and BMP-2 in the older rats was smaller than that in the younger rats, which may contribute to slower fracture repair. The return of mRNA gene expression to baseline in the older rats prior to healing may contribute to the delayed union. The slower healing response of the older rats did not stimulate a negative-feedback increase in the mRNA expression of stimulatory cytokines. | Slower healing in older age group |
Skripitiz R, et al. 2001 | Animal study | Sprague-Dawley rats, (n=28) Screwed in either one proximal tibia (n = 8) used for the measurement of removal torque; screwed in both (n = 20) proximal tibiae: one for removal torque (left) and the other (right) for pullout strength. | In the medial proximal tibial metaphysis an insertion hole was hand-milled in the cancellous bone, approximately 3 mm distal to the epiphysis, using a regular 1 mm injection needle. Each implant was inserted in the hole and screwed down carefully until its head reached the bone. All the screws were manufactured from stainless steel (SS 2333). The threaded part was 1.7 mm in diameter and 3 mm long | PTH was administered in a dosage of 60 [mu]g/kg/day (n = 14) or vehicle (n = 14) over a period of four weeks. At the end of this time, the degree of fixation was assessed by measuring the removal torque on one screw in each rat (n = 28) and the pull-out strength on the contralateral screw (n = 20). | PTH increased the mean removal torque from 1.1 to 3.5 Ncm and the mean pull-out strength from 66 to 145 N . No significant differences in body-weight or ash weight of the femora were seen. Histological examination: both groups had areas of soft tissue at the implant-bone interface, but these appeared less in the PTH group. These results indicate that intermittent treatment with PTH may enhance the early fixation of orthopaedic implants. | Increased |
We did include 4 articles which looked at callus formation without drugs in fracture healing for further comparison (Table Ia).
Table Ia.
Author (last name, year) | Study design | Sample size | Intervention type | Conclusions | Callus formation (+/-) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hao Y. et al., 2007 | Animal study | Sprague-Dawley rats (n=96, female). OPF group (OVX) n=48 NF group (Control) n=48 | A mid-shaft femur fracture model was established 12 weeks after OVX. Femurs were harvested at 4, 8 and 12 weeks for peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), micro-computed tomography (MicroCT), histology and biomechanical test. | MicroCT data (12 wks) showed the total callus, bony callus, and newly formed bone was approximately 20% lower in the OPF group than that in the NP group, and the total connectivity was 56% lower in the OPF group as compared to the NF group. Biomechanical test data, at 12 weeks, showed that the failure load of the left femur of OPF group was 17% less compared to that of the NF group (Pb0.01), and 15% lower bending stiffness (Pb0.05), 20% lower bending stress (Pb0.01), and 28% lower energy at failure (Pb0.0 were observed in the OPF | Decreased |
Lill C.A., et al 2003 | Animal study | Swiss Mountain sheep (14 female) Group 1: 7 osteoporotic sheep. Group 2: 7 healthy animals (controls). | A mid-shaft osteotomy of the right tibia fracture (gap of 3 mm). To avoid an effect of bone healing due to the corticosteroid, the medication was stopped 90 days before osteotomy. Bending stiffness and torsional stiffness of the callus zone were also determined. | Callus area, callus density, and osteoporosis status were determined at 0, 4, and 8 weeks using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. The increase of in vivo bending stiffness of the callus was delayed approximately 2 weeks in osteoporotic animals. A significant difference (33%) in torsional stiffness was found between the osteotomized and contralateral intact tibia in osteoporotic animals, but no significant difference occurred in normal sheep (2%). In osteoporotic animals, ex vivo bending stiffness was reduced (21%). Bending stiffness was correlated with callus density; torsional stiffness was correlated with callus area and to a lesser extent with callus density. This study demonstrated a delay of fracture healing in osteoporotic sheep tibiae with respect to callus formation, mineralization, and mechanical properties. | Delayed |
H. Namkung- Matthai, et al. 2001 | Animal study | 34 female Sprague-Dawley rats, aged 2 months, ovariectomized or sham operation (sx). Ovx rats were fed LCD to induce rapid osteoporosis, whereas sx rats were fed conventional food | An open right femoral midshaft fracture was created and stabilized by intramedullary pins in rats from both ovx and sx groups (517/gp) | Biomechanical data from the healing femur of the ovx rats revealed a fivefold decrease in the energy required to break the fracture callus, a threefold decrease in peak failure load, a twofold decrease in stiffness and a threefold decrease in stress as compared with the sx group. Histomorphological analysis: revealed a delay in fracture callus healing with poor development of mature bone in the ovx rats. | Decreased |
Kubo T., et al. 1999 | Animal study | Wister rats (n=90 female) ovariectomized (n=15) sham-operation (n=10) 30 rats each from the OVX+F group and the control-F group were used for examinations and the remaining 10 rats were used for examination | A transverse fracture on the diaphysis produced by a lateral longitudinal incision on the unilateral femur Maintained a low calcium diet | Femur fracture was produced 12 weeks after ovariectomy, and the healing process was monitored for the subsequent 12 weeks. As a result, the healing rate was 100% in all animals. Bone fracture itself can be healed even under such conditions as low bone mineral density, low estrogen and low calcium | Increased |
Discussion
Fracture healing in animal models
Although many studies have shown that ovariectomy (OVX) has a pronounced influence on bone mass and metabolism, the properties of healing fractures in diseased models such as osteoporosis have received little attention. Only recently has the clinical importance of osteoporotic fractures led to more exploration of information from osteoporotic animal models.
Hao et al. established an osteoporotic fracture rat model to evaluate the changes of microstructure and mineralized tissue of newly formed callus during the middle and late phase of fracture healing in both normal and osteoporotic rats induced by OVX (48 Sprague Dawley rats at 8 months old were ovariectomized, and 48 were used as controls) (7). Twelve weeks after OVX, osteoporosis was confirmed by total body areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Established OVX rats was defined as a significantly lower mean aBMD than that obtained from the control group. A controlled mid-shaft femoral fracture was made and the rats were sacrificed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The scanned specimens included the original cortical diaphyseal bone as well as the entire periosteal and endosteal callus with diameters ranging from 4.20 to 7.95 mm (μCT-40, Scanco Medical, Basserdorf, Switzerland). After 12 weeks of OVX, aBMD in the OVX rats was on average 19.4% less than that in the controls (P<0.01). Volumetric BMD increased healing over time in both the treated group (OPF) and the control group (NF). The BMD in the OPF group was lower than that in the NF group at all post operation time points, which was found statistically significant at 8 weeks and 12 weeks. The callus area in the OPF group was smaller than that in the NF group at 4 weeks after fracture (P<0.05). Thereafter, the callus area increased in both groups. However, the callus area in the OPF group was not on average 21% larger than that in the NF group until 12 weeks after fracture (P<0.01).
In animal models, fracture healing takes longer in older animal (8, 9). In a study by Meyer et al., the investigators demonstrated that the rat model showed slower healing in the elderly in a comparison study of a 6-wk old vs 1-yr old rat with a closed, nailed femoral shaft fracture (10). The young healed in 6 weeks showing periosteal bridging, while the old needed 26 weeks. However, the BMD was not considered and there was no ovariectomy. The investigators demonstrated the same pattern of cytokine gene expression in both groups, with lower levels of IHH and BMP-2 in older rats. The levels fall back to normal at the same time in both groups, despite the fact that the older rats had not healed. There is no feedback loop to keep the cytokine drive going.Whether ovariectomy adds an additional impediment is conflicting. Some animal studies showed deficient healing, especially in the early response (11-15) and some did not (16-20). Differences in the timing of ovariectomy, age of the animals and dietary factors make comparisons difficult.
Fracture healing in the clinical scenario
Clinical observations indicate that fragility fractures heal despite the abnormality of bone remodelling in osteoporosis. There is no clear evidence yet as to whether complications during the course of healing are attributable to implant anchorage problems in osteoporotic bone or to possibly delayed healing in elderly patients.
Most patients who need treatment for osteoporosis will currently receive anti-catabolic agents and it is important whether this may have any disadvantage for the healing of incident fractures in the long term. Anabolic agents that are used to treat osteoporosis would be expected to have a beneficial effect on fracture healing (Table II). There is no evidence that anti-catabolic drugs impair restoration of mechanical integrity, irrespective of when they are given or their mechanism of action, despite the fact that they may delay remodelling (21).
Table II.
Agent | Principle mode of action | Affect on fracture healing |
---|---|---|
Bisphosphonates | Anti-catabolic | Increase callus size Increased strength or no change in animal models Delay remodelling |
SERMs | Anti-catabolic | Minimal effects noted |
Strontium ranelate | Anti-catabolic Anabolic? | Unknown |
PTH | Anabolic | Increase cartilage production Increased rate of remodelling Increased strength in animal models |
The fracture healing potential in patients with compromised bone structure and turnover can be explained by the different pathways of fracture repair and bone remodelling.
Fracture repair involves different stages of tissue differentiation which resemble aspects of embryological skeletal development (22). Opinion on the role of osteoclasts in fracture repair is conflicting. Whereas the initial inflammatory phase and subsequent bone formation during the repair phase are largely osteoclast independent, coupled remodelling of woven bone to lamellar bone during the remodelling phase at the end of fracture repair does depend on osteoclast activity.
The initial drive to the periosteal bone regeneration is weak in older people, and switches off before healing occurs. Slower (endosteal) healing modes will heal the fracture eventually, given stability. But stability depends on enduring fixation and enduring fixation is difficult in osteoporotic bone.
Implant fixation
Although the fracture healing potential in the osteoporotic patient is normal, the incidence of fracture nonunions and malunions is significant. This is in part due to implant loosening occurring prior to the completion of the fracture healing process.
This complication is caused by the inability of standard implants to achieve good and durable fixation in the mechanically weak bone. The difficulty in obtaining stable fixation is responsible for the less than satisfactory clinical results which are commonly seen with this patient population (23).
The causes of pin loosening and infection are multifactorial. Biomechanical tests have shown that implant anchorage is impaired in osteoporotic bone in animal studies, implants failed earlier in compromised bone structure, via cut-out or cutthrough, than they did in healthy bone. Thermal and mechanical damage of the bone during pin insertion and formation of fibrous tissue at the bone-pin interface have been identified as the most important factor in pin loosening (24-26). This fibrous tissue formation is thought to be an inevitable phenomenon with stainless steel and titanium pins. However, differences in bone-pin contact related to different metal types have been reported. A higher osteointegration was reported in pins coated with titanium compared with similar pins made of stainless steel.
Another innovative approach is to use osteoporosis drugs which can improve implant fixation. Despite the large numbers of patients treated with bisphosphonates, the effect of these drugs on fracture healing has not been extensively investigated in humans (27). The achievement of adequate fracture stability, which promotes rapid bone repair, is also necessary. This was shown in a variety of animal experiments using different types of systemic or locally applied bisphosphonates (28). Bisphosphonates attracted to the hydroxyapatite in the bone will firstly inhibit bone resorption by being incorporated selectively into osteoclasts and secondly, by interfering with the cells’ biological activity. Previous animal studies have shown that bisphosphonates can improve early fixation in both cortical and cancellous bone (29). Other studies have also demonstrated that alendronate inhibits bone resorption at the bone-screw interface thereby enhancing fixation (30). This active bone remodelling initiated by the alendronate around the implant permits good bone-screw fixation and the prevention of pin loosening or infection. This effect has been reproduced in humans utilizing an external fixator and hydroxyapatite screws for the treatment of proximal femur fractures. The data showed that weekly systemic administration of alendronate improved pin fixation in cancellous bone in elderly female patients with osteoporosis. There was a twofold increase in extraction torque with the pins implanted in cancellous bone (31). Furthermore, there were no differences in clinical outcomes, such as fracture healing or loss of fixation between the control and those treated with alendronate.
Improved implant anchorage was also achieved in animal experiments using PTH (32). So far no clinical data are available that support these findings in humans. The reproduction of findings from animal experiments in clinical studies is complicated by the fact that no universally accepted measure of fracture healing exists in humans. Alternatively, the rate of prospectively defined bone-related complications, or measurement of function and radiological status at defined time points of healing, might be utilized (33).
Drugs that improve fracture healing
Bisphosphonates
Recent studies with incandronate, showed an enlarged callus that was strong, but incandronate delayed callus remodelling in the fractured femora of rats (34-36). This delay persisted 49 weeks after fracture. Some suggested that the strength of the callus is paramount and that the delay in resorption of the callus is of little consequence, because the organism compensated for any negative effect of the drug on composition of the callus by increasing size (37). However, others have suggested that fracture healing is considered complete when the fracture line is no longer visible radiographically, when the skeletal architecture is restored, and when the mechanical strength is fully restored (38, 39).
Parathryoid hormone
Although constantly increased levels of PTH lead to bone resorption, it has been known since the 1930’s that intermittently administered PTH has a strong positive effect on skeletal metabolism (40).
Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTHrP) signal through a common receptor PTHR1, and it has been hypothesized that systemic PTH regulates endochondral bone formation by altering the local PTHR1-Indian hedgehog (IHH) regulatory loop. In the growth plate, this pathway has been shown to coordinate chondrocyte and osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, which appears consistent with the same function in fracture repair (41). Additionally, regulatory interactions in the growth plate have shown that IHH signalling is coordinated with canonical WNT signalling during endochondral bone formation. The role of the WNT signalling pathway in fracture repair has attracted recent attention. This interest initially stemmed in part from observations that gain and loss-of-function mutations of one of its co-receptors, lipoprotein-related peptide 5 (LRP5), result in a gain or loss of bone mass, respectively, and the disease osteoporosis pseudoglioma syndrome (42). Additionally, WNT pathway members and target genes, such as the WNT target gene WNT-induced secreted protein 1 (WISP1), are expressed during fracture healing (43, 44). There are eighteen identified murine WNTs, which are divided into canonical and noncanonical classes on the basis of their functional ability to form a secondary embryonic body axis (45). While the non-canonical WNT signalling pathway is not clearly understood, the canonical pathway has been studied widely in relation to endochondrol bone formation, including its role in regulating mesenchymal progenitor lineage selection, osteogenesis, and chondrogenesis (42). Recent studies have further evaluated the possibility of enhancing fracture repair through the pharmacological activation of the canonical WNT pathway.
Kakar et al. evaluated the mechanisms by which systemic PTH (PTH [1-34]) affects fracture repair (42). With use of a closed murine femoral fracture model, bones were harvested at periods throughout healing following injections with 30 μg/kg PTH or saline solution for fourteen days after fracture. The authors found a threefold greater increase in chondrogenesis relative to osteogenesis over the course of repair, with earlier appearance of chondrocyte hypertrophy in the PTH-treated calluses. Furthermore, PTH treatment significantly induced an increased level of canonical WNT-signaling in PTH-treated bones, suggesting that the effects of PTH administration occur at least in part through WNT signalling. It is even at these lower doses of PTH administration of this study and that of other animal studies that have shown an enhancement in bone repair (46, 47).
Conclusions
Mechanical and biological factors contribute to the healing processes of bone and are affected by age and osteoporosis.
Callus formation is the natural repair and fixation response to a fracture in the absence of artificial fixation devices including casts or osteosynthetic materials. Callus response is also an expression of fracture healing and by quantifying the increase in size of the callus it is possible to measure the healing process. Animal studies have shown that ovariectomy significantly reduces bone mass. The mechanical strength of the bone following bridged healing indicates a reduction in the completion of healing. In this situation, fracture healing appears to be delayed with respect to callus mineralization and biomechanical properties. There are a variety of effects noted with current standard anti-resorptive therapies in common use for the treatment of established osteoporosis. Limitations exist with animal models and more clinical evidence is needed in order to evaluate these treatments for callus formation in the aged with osteoporosis.
References
- 1.Kristiansen TK, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79-A:961–73. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199707000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:26–34. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199401000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wahlstrom O. Clin Orthop. 1984;186:293–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Waisman M, Schweppy I. Experimental study on healing of bone fractures using L-dopa. Clin Orthop. 1979;142:244–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pritchett JW. L-dopa in the treatment of nonunited fractures. Clin Orthop. 1990;255:293–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Holzer G, Majeska RJ, Lundy MW, et al. Parathyroid hormone enhances fracture healing: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop. 1999;366:258–263. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199909000-00033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hao YJ, Zhang G, Wang YS, et al. Changes of microstructure and mineralized tissue in the middle and late phase of osteoporotic fracture healing in rats . Bone. 2007;41(4):631–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meyer RA Jr, Tsahakis PJ, Martin DF, et al. Age and ovariectomy impair both the normalization of mechanical properties and the accretion of mineral by the fracture callus in rats. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(3):428–35. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(00)90034-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lill CA, Hesseln J, Schlegel U, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of healing in a non-critical defect in a large animal model of osteoporosis. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(5):836–42. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00266-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meyer RA, et al. Gene expression in older rats with delayed union of femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85-A:1243–54. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meyer RA Jr, Desai BR, Heiner DE, et al. Young, adult, and old rats have similar changes in mRNA expression of many skeletal genes after fracture despite delayed healing with age. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(10):1933–44. doi: 10.1002/jor.20124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xu SW, Yu R, Zhao GF, et al. Early period of fracture healing in ovariectomized rats. Chin J Traumatol. 2003;6(3):160–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Namkung-Matthai H, Appleyard R, Jansen J, et al. Osteoporosis influences the early period of fracture healing in a rat osteoporotic model. Bone. 2001;28(1):80–6. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00414-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Bishop G, Davis AD, Wigner NA, Gerstenfeld LC, Einhorn TA. Combined effects of recombinant human BMP-7 (rhBMP-7) and parathyroid hormone (1-34) in metaphyseal bone healing. Bone. 2008 Dec;43(6):1031–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.07.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Holstein JH, Klein M, Garcia P, et al. Rapamycin affects early fracture healing in mice. British J of Pharmacology. 2008;154(5):1055–62. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Amanat N, He LH, Swain MV, et al. The effect of zolendronic acid on the intrinsic material properties of healing bone: an indentation study. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2008;30(7):843–7. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang JW, Xu SW, Yang DS, et al. Locally applied simvastatin promotes fracture healing in ovariectomized rat. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(12):1641–50. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0412-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cebesoy O, Tutar E, Kose KC, et al. Effect of strontium ranelate on fracture healing in rat tibia. Joint, Bone. Spine: Revue du Rhumatisme. 2007;74(6):590–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Melhus G, Solberg LB, Dimmen S, et al. Experimental osteoporosis induced by ovariectomy and vitamin D deficiency does not markedly affect fracture healing in rats. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(3):393–403. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kubo T, Shiga T, Hashimoto J, et al. Osteoporosis influences the late period of fracture healing in a rat model prepared by ovariectomy and low calcium diet. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1999;68:197–202. doi: 10.1016/s0960-0760(99)00032-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McDonald MM, Dulai S, Godfrey C, Amanat N, et al. Bolus or weekly zoledronic acid administration does not delay endochondal fracture repair but weekly dosing enhances delays in hard callus remodelling. Bone. 2008;43:653–662. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gerstenfeld LC, Cullinane DM, Barnes GL, et al. Fracture healing as a post-natal developmental process: Molecular, spatial, and temporal aspects of its regulation. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(5):873–84. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stromse K. Fracture fixation problems in osteoporosis. Injury. 2004;35(2):107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moroni A, Caja VL, Maltarello MC, et al. Biomechanical, scanning electron microscopy, and microhardness analyses of the bone pin interface in hydroxyapatite coated versus uncoated pins. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:154–161. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199704000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moroni A, Toksvig-Larsen S, Maltarello MC, et al. A comparison of hydroxyapatite coated, titanium coated and uncoated tapered external fixation pins: an in vivo study in sheep. J Bone. Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:547–554. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199804000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moroni A, Orienti L, Stea S, et al. Improvement of the pin-bone interface with hydroxyapatite coating: an in vivo long-term experimental study. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:236–242. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199605000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Morris CD, Einhorn TA. Bisphosphonates in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1609–18. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.03032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Aspenberg P. Drugs and fracture repair. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(6):741–8. doi: 10.1080/17453670510045318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Skoglund B, Holmertz J, Aspenberg P. Systemic and local ibandronate enhance screw fixation. J Orthopaedic Res. 2004;22:1108–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Miyaji T, Nakase T, Azuma Azuma, et al. Alendronate inhibits bone resorption at the bone-screw interface. Clin Orthop and Relat Res. 2005;430:195–201. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000137553.91189.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moroni A, Faldini C, Hoang-Kim A, et al. Alendronate improves screw fixation in osteoporotic bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(1):96–101. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Skripitz R, Aspenberg P. Implant fixation enhanced by intermittent treatment with parathyroid hormone. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(3):437–40. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b3.10256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goldhahn J, Mitlak B, Aspenberg P, et al. Critical issues in translational and clinical research for the study of new technologies to enhance bone repair. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90(1):43–7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li J, Mori S, Kaji Y, et al. Effect of bisphosphonate (Incandronate) on fracture healing of long bones in rats. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:969–79. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.6.969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li J, Mori S, Kaji Y, et al. Concentration of bisphosphonate (incandronate) in callus area and its effects on fracture healing in rats. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:2042–51. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.10.2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li CY, Mori S, Li JL, et al. Long term effect of incadronate Disodium (YM-175) on fracture healing of femoral shaft in growing rats. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:429–436. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.3.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fleisch H. can bisphosphonate be given to patients with fractures? J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:437–440. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.3.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nyman MT, Paavolainen P, Lindholm TS. Clodronate increases the calcium content in fracture callus. An experimental study in rats. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1993;112:228–231. doi: 10.1007/BF00451880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nakamura T, Hara Y, Tagawa M, et al. Recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor accelerates fracture healing by enhancing callus remodelling in experimental dog tibial fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13:942–949. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.6.942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Seyle H. On the stimulation of new bone formation with parathyroid extract and irradiated Ergosterol. Endocrinology. 1932;16:547–58. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ferguson C, Alpern E, Michalu T, et al. Does adult fracture repair recapitulate embryonic skeletal formation? Mech Dev. 1999;87:57–66. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00142-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kakar S, Einhorn TA, Vora S, et al. Enhanced chondrogenesis and Wnt signalling in PTH-treated fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1903–12. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hadjiargyrou M, Lombardo F, Zhao S, et al. Transcriptional profiling of bone regeneration. Insight into the molecular complexity of wound repair. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:30177–82. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203171200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.French DM, Kaul RJ, D’Souza AL, et al. WISP-1 is an osteoblastic regulator expressed during skeletal development and fracture repair . Am J Pathol. 2004;165:855–67. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63348-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Westendorf JJ, Kahler RA, Schroeder TM. Wnt signalng in osteoblasts and bone diseases. Gene. 2004;341:19–39. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nakajima A, Shimoji N, Shiomi L, et al. Mechanisms for the enhancement of fracture healing in rats treated with intermittent lowdose human parathyroid hormone (1-34) J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:2038–47. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.11.2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Alkhiary YM, Gerstenfeld LC, Krall E, et al. Enhancement of experimental fracture healing by systemic administration of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34) J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:731–41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]